Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Would You Deal With A 'Gaslighting' Colleague?

An anonymous reader writes: What's the best unofficial way to deal with a gaslighting colleague? For those not familiar, I mean "bullies unscheduling things you've scheduled, misplacing files and other items that you are working on and co-workers micro-managing you and being particularly critical of what you do and keeping it under their surveillance. They are watching you too much, implying or blatantly saying that you are doing things wrong when, in fact, you are not...a competitive maneuver, a way of making you look bad so that they look good." I'd add poring over every source-code commit, and then criticizing it even if the criticism is contradictory to what he previously said.
The submission adds that "Raising things through the official channels is out of the question, as is confronting the colleague in question directly as he is considered something of a superstar engineer who has been in the company for decades and has much more influence than any ordinary engineer." So leave your best suggestions in the comments. How would you deal with a gaslighting colleague?

433 comments

  1. Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they've been there for decades then it's considered acceptable behavior and nothing will change. Time to move on.

    1. Re:Leave. by BillNickless · · Score: 5, Informative

      Exactly right. It's time to go. Gaslighting makes the victim depressed and stupid, so you won't be able to perform at your best. Eventually you will be fired for cause, and it's because you really will have failed to do a good job.

      Now that you're aware of being gaslighting, it's absolutely critical for you to take care of your on your mental health and decision making as you plan and execute exit strategy. Establish, nurture, and rely on relationships outside of work; preferably with people you know and trust to give you honest feedback.

      To quote a neuroscientist:

      "The effects of gaslighting on normal individuals can be extraordinarily unsettling and can contribute to confused behavior and scattered thinking patterns in those who have been subjected to the phenomenon. [....] Could it be that, by sending conflicting signals as with the difference between reality and what [the gaslighter] falsely insists is reality, desynchronization might occur in neural structures that normally work together? Such desynchronization might account for the confused short-term reaction and the depressed long-term reaction to gaslighting behavior."

      Source: Barbara Oakley, Evil Genes: Why Rome Fell, Hitler Rose, Enron Failed, and Why My Sister Stole My Mother's Boyfriend

    2. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I worked at a major stock xchange where this was the norm.
      I had no success (even though I wrote a critical piece of sw still in use today)
      and left.

      CAP === 'antibody'

    3. Re:Leave. by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And in the letter of resignation (perhaps a separate one to management, rather than one to your colleagues), document in great detail the actual reason for your departure. It's pretty hard to ignore a complaint that isn't just an idle threat. The gaslighter drove someone out of the company, so management will notice.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:Leave. by war4peace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless he drove dozens before, and management still didn't care, because he's someone's protege.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    5. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Take as much time as you need but begin looking now.

    6. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe look around your colleagues and see if you are the only one facing the problem.

      It's a tell tale sign to see if it's your problem (everyone gaslight you) or a widespread cultural issue (one or a few guys gaslight everyone else).

    7. Re:Leave. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Deliver a letter of resignation and leave. Agreed. If the environment is that toxic to begin with the leadership in the company isn't worth serving under.

    8. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't win this. So leave. Always remember the lesson, though.

    9. Re:Leave. by nyet · · Score: 2

      What if the person complaining about being gaslit is actually delusional, paranoid, insecure, and incompetent?

    10. Re:Leave. by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't recommend that unless your country has no laws against libel.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    11. Re: Leave. by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      If someone is performing poorly, there's no reason to gaslight because the required justification to get rid of him is already available.

    12. Re:Leave. by david_bonn · · Score: 1

      ... any well-ran company will give you an exit interview.

      Once, long-ago, I promptly quit because of an abusive coworker. I was somewhat shielded by my immediate supervisor from his depredations but when she quit I was left in the line of fire. I lasted about six more weeks. At my exit interview, the first question out of the interviewer (whom I respected and trusted) was: "You're quitting because of G-----, correct?"

      My jaw hit the floor. I didn't realize anyone knew. It turned out damned near the whole company knew about this jerk.

    13. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While airing your complaints on exit may feel good, it is almost never in your best interest to do so.

      If the company cared about this problem, the OP could bring it up now and get it resolved without having to leave. Even if someone does fire the problem guy - who's winning? The OP is already out the door. And, he'll likely put two and two together and figure out the OP was the reason, possibly causing him problems down the road.

      A best case scenario is that the company tosses his resignation letter in the garbage without reading it. More likely, one or more of his former colleagues will read it, take offense, and possibly also cause the OP problems in the future.

    14. Re: Leave. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      From the "Raising things through the official channels is out of the question"... It seems quite possible.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    15. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because it's easier to believe someone has a paranoid delusional psychosis than it is to believe that a company somewhere has unhealthy office politics? And the "proof" of the plausibility of that psychosis is that the managerial layer of the office hierarchy is unresponsive to employee concerns? I'm assuming you either have little exposure to varied social environments or that you are a part of the unhealthy social environments in which you take part.

    16. Re:Leave. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No good, because the only way to deal with these types of jerks is for the company to fire both the arsehole causing the problem and the arsehole who hired them. And that's just not going to happen.

      Save yourself the aggravation - quit. They'll be cursing bozo out soon enough when things start breaking.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    17. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just keep your mouth shut and put a lot of really weird porn on his computer... like rosie odonnel having sex with erkle .... nah .. but honestly if the guy is that big of a jerk then they are probably doing something that hurts the company.. just keep your eyes open for it and when something he does loses the company money he will be gone and you won't be the bad guy... either that or leave... or make friends with the guy.. buy him some drinks after work.. get the guy on your side and he won't screw with you... like they say .. keep your friends close and your enemas closer... yeah i spelt that right...

    18. Re:Leave. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      Bozos like that never sue - even though they like to make all sorts of threats. First, that would cost money - the company sure as hell won't fund it. Second, he's going to need to prove that what you said damaged his reputation - in other words, that his reputation was good until people heard what you wrote or said. Kid of hard if you've got people on your side saying he was an insufferable jerk. Third, good luck setting a dollar amount for damages - the company will never say they fired him (if they do) because of what you said, because that opens them up to an unjust dismissal suit. And if he isn't fired, where's the damages? A demotion? It could be based on job performance - and the company will say that because, again, they don't want to be sued.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    19. Re:Leave. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2

      What if the person complaining about being gaslit is actually delusional, paranoid, insecure, and incompetent?

      It's usually the person doing the gaslighting who is delusional, paranoid, insecure, and incompetent. The problem is that most people won't believe anyone could actually do the crap they pull, they must be telling the truth ... nobody would make up stuff like that ...

      Leave. Your mental and physical health are more important than misplaced loyalty or a bruised ego.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    20. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently, a Republican nominee was speaking to this "tactic" as he felt gaslighting was definitive strategy for presidential candidate's win.

    21. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad idea IMO. It just makes you look bitter, small, and petty. It might even get you a 'not eligible for rehire."
      If HR asks why, the most I'd say – verbally – is $name. You don't need to go into detail. If they hear $name enough times they might eventually get the clue that said person is driving people away.
      If they never get the clue, it's not your problem.
      But mostly I'd resist the temptation and just leave with "I found something better...."

    22. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of HR's anti-bully training, they give us all kinds of phone-numbers of people to complain to inside the company, but they also listed a phone-number of a local business-ethics group ran by the county that we can contact in case you can't get people inside the company to fix the issue. Of course, being a multi-national company, anyone from any country can make use.

    23. Re:Leave. by schnell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wouldn't recommend that unless your country has no laws against libel.

      Check your local laws of course, but writing something bad about someone in a private setting (i.e. in a non-public letter to a corporate HR department) is almost never grounds for a libel lawsuit, as far as I have ever heard. If that were so, there would be no such thing as customer service surveys, whistleblower laws, "mystery shopper" feedback, etc.

      Libel is generally reserved for covering "public" pronouncements, typically in the form of journalistic stories. And even in those rare cases where, for example, a business has sued a private citizen over a bad Yelp review or some other public lambasting, they have pretty much universally lost.

      In addition, most corporations have as part of their employment conditions that you can't sue the company or other employees as a result of negative opinions expressed as part of "official" company communications, such as an employee review or exit interview. (Otherwise no one could ever give an employee a bad review!) There are limits of course - if you allege that someone has committed a crime on the job, that obligates your employer to take it to the police, and depending on how that goes you could be opening yourself up to other things if your accusations of criminal activity are found to be negligibly inaccurate. But I assume you're not going there.

      Libel law has many twists and turns which shouldn't be underestimated, but don't take it as a blanket reason for why you should never say anything bad about anyone - especially if it is provably true - in a context that is not intended for public consumption.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    24. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      He says he didn't take my stapler, but I would burn the building down.

    25. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointless. If the company tolerates that sort of bullshit (these dickheads have been around for decades), there's no point in bringing up the problem.

      I don't tolerate this sort of behaviour at work and will do everything in my (limited) power to eliminate it.
       

    26. Re:Leave. by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what? IMO - you never have anything to lose by documenting valid reasons you left a company. I suspect that in quite a few cases, upper management doesn't really do anything about it when they receive letters or exit interview information like this. But eventually, it piles up and *someone* notices. (I used to work at a place like that, where one of the managers had a continuous history of insulting and angering the interns and assistants they hired to work with him. Many years of that went on, with everyone else who worked there long enough gossiping about it and how it would "never change". But then the economy took a nosedive and they had to make cutbacks. Guess who one of the first guys was they let go?)

      If you don't already use it, I'd also recommend creating an account over on GlassDoor.com and make sure you post about the issue there. At least that way, you might be helping someone else who is researching the company and considering taking the opening you left behind, or one similar.

    27. Re:Leave. by mnemotronic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed. You can't save the world. The company deserves him and vice-versa. Let them stew together in their self-realized creeping miasma of putrid decay.

      After you've gone elsewhere, send your manager a webpage detailing gaslighting, Perhaps something like this. The downside is that that page is written by a blogger; not a lawyer or mental health specialist.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    28. Re:Leave. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0, Troll

      If the "gaslighter" has been around for decades, and is considered a "superstar engineer", then he is probably right, and the submitter is just an incompetent whiner, and management will be glad to be rid of him. If someone with decades more experience than you points out problems with your code, you should shutup, listen, and learn.

    29. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my first thought as well.

      This person comes across like a perpetual victim. I've never heard someone use the word "gaslighting" who wasn't themselves a drama queen always hunting for the next offense.

      How about growing the fuck up. Going to another job won't fix the problem, because you are the problem.

    30. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you know this person isn't the gaslighter? Maybe they see themselves as the victim, and distort reality at the expense of those around them to fit the victimhood narrative?

      In today's petulant "me" society, it's more than likely. Especially for people who casually use the word "gaslighting". They've been reading too much personality politics bullshit.

    31. Re:Leave. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This can't be stressed enough.

      EVERYTHING, even the little things, should be documented, with evidence where possible. Because that's the only possible way to defend yourself.

      Carry your phone around in a pocket or something at work. Take pictures. Copy documents.

    32. Re:Leave. by s.petry · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly reasonable to write the complaint for public review without naming the person. People inside the company interested will know who the message is about if there is a history of that sort of thing. The exit interview is the place to name the specifics.

      The company taking a hit because of bad reputation is not something they can sue for without specific conditions. E.G. Article states that the company policy dictated that type of behavior, management encourage that sort of behavior, etc... Even then, it's a difficult case for the company to make.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    33. Re:Leave. by lucm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'll be cursing bozo out soon enough when things start breaking.

      Or maybe things won't start breaking. Maybe things work just fine - especially since the alleged asshole has been there for decades - and an ecosystem that's been in place just got rid of an outsider that didn't fit in.

      The world is a rich tapestry. Some organizations thrive with neurotics and sociopaths in key roles - for instance, Steve Jobs was a piece of shit but he was the driving force at Apple. See what happened when they kicked him out for being an asshole.

      Barry Bonds was not a positive presence but he sure helped his team win. And there are many other famous cases.

      This being said, if someone at work is unpleasant, is making one's life difficult and is well-regarded by senior management, then yes quitting is the best solution if putting up with it is not an option. This is not kindergarten, this is real life.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    34. Re:Leave. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      It's usually the person doing the gaslighting who is delusional, paranoid, insecure, and incompetent.

      True, but in the Age of Trump, gaslighting is seen by awful people as "smart" and a "winning strategy".

      We're watching in real time as an entire nation is being gaslighted. Of course, the worst people in the work place are going to adopt the same strategy. Individuals need to insulate themselves as best they can and then fight back like hell.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    35. Re: Leave. by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Or the 'gaslighter' is responsible for stagnation of the company. What worked for a decade may no longer be the best approach.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    36. Re:Leave. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is quite incorrect. I would say dangerously incorrect. At least in most of the U.S.

      In general, actionable defamation (of which libel and slander are particular examples) only requires that you express untrue, damaging things to someone other than the party you are referring to. There is NO specific requirement that it be public.

      And "damage" is used loosely here. Damage could mean damage to their career, or damage to their public reputation, or even just damage to a single friend's opinion of them.

      If you wrote untrue, damaging things in a document to your HR department, that could definitely be considered libel, and would likely be actionable. Specific cases vary, but again in general.

      Of course, truth is (again in general... most U.S. states) an absolute defense. So if what you wrote is true and you can demonstrate that it is, by a preponderance of evidence, then you're probably safe. But you'd better have that evidence.

      In addition, most corporations have as part of their employment conditions that you can't sue the company or other employees as a result of negative opinions expressed as part of "official" company communications, such as an employee review or exit interview.

      Again in the U.S., that is simply not true. "Most" corporations do NOT have such a clause in their contract, and there is a very strong push to stop that practice in those states where it is still allowed. Because in some states such clauses are specifically prohibited by law, and the list of those states is growing.

    37. Re:Leave. by Deathlizard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not worth it. period. There are better jobs out there.

      My previous job I was at was micromanaged severely, which isn't exactly the same thing as Gaslighting, but it screws with your job performance and sanity in similar ways. It was so bad I had to make an app out of Google forms on my phone to literally log everything I do every minute of every day on the job. And then get bitched at because I missed 10-15 minutes or so on the report it generated (or missed logging the ticket in one of the three different ticketing systems and the calendar we had) cause of unexpected things turning up, like climbing a scissor-lift at 3 in the morning on a Sunday at one of our clients cause a UPS three stories up in the ceiling decided to shit the bed and then not get paid for half of it cause I had to wait an hour and a half for the skeleton maintenance crew to actually find it.

      The other thing you need to understand is that you come first. Everybody, and I mean Everybody that worked at this place had something that I could only describe as Stockholm Syndrome. Everyone under management hated the way the company was managed and how they were treated but they were real close to their coworkers and nobody wanted to leave because they knew it would screw the rest of the team or the company would go under if they left. We thought we could get management to see the light but got nowhere. This kept me there for almost a year longer than I should of stayed.

      I finally got out, and was willing to give them two weeks to transition my duties, but my new employer wanted a reference from my current employer, Which they refused to give positive or negative because it "was their choice to do so". When I called them on it they literally called me and my coworkers into a meeting and wanted me to repeat the question to everybody so that they could 1) divide the coworkers up and turn them against me. and 2) show them what will happen if they tried to leave. As the meeting was talking place my new employer called and would accept me without the reference if I would take a 6 month probationary period, Which I accepted over speakerphone, handed them my office keys and walked out of the meeting and the door. No way I was giving them two weeks either way and let the bosses screw my career over by making shit up about my performance after they pulled that stunt.

      I am now working at a place where I am being Paid less (with better benefits that offset the loss however) and working twice as much but I'm not being micromanaged and that's good enough for me. I'm not as stressed out, I've lost weight and I'm not on call 24/7 (although I'm still on the old companies alert system. during Christmas break I would have got called out no less than 10-15 times) so I can sleep at night and actually take vacation time without worrying that all hell was going to break loose when I was away.

    38. Re:Leave. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      a webpage detailing gaslighting, Perhaps something like this.

      Ugh, I feel like I just delved into Trump's mind.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    39. Re:Leave. by mlts · · Score: 1

      That is a sure failure on HR's part right there. When it is common knowledge that a certain person is causing good people to prepare their three envelopes, HR needs to get involved and either have management put the offending person in a place that they can't keep harming the corporate infrastructure, or even better, give them the boot.

    40. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might just be the case, that someone has to stoop to gaslighting to get a problem child out the door. However, if someone gets caught, the gaslighter has a lot to own up for.

      Also, "gaslighting" is more of a "dramatic" phrase. The last time I dealt with a co-worker pulling shit like editing config files then blaming it on other people, it wasn't "gaslighting", it was sabotage, pure and simple.

      Generally I see very few people doing "gaslighting" in IT, because it is -so easy- to fuck over co-workers and never get caught, even with log managers. Trying to "gaslight" a peer in IT is a lesson in mutually assured destruction, with the environment going to Hell in a handbasket really quickly. The dedicated IT people, if confronted with a "gaslighter" start going into CYA mode, and once they have an airtight case, bring the offender, a HR rep, two managers, and a physical presentation of what has been happening, and a demand for it to stop. If HR/management are not consisting of total plebes, if given the choice between a solid IT guy leaving versus someone (who is likely not so good, as they stopped to "gaslighting" in the first place), they likely will lean to pink-slipping the problem child. However, if the person being "gaslighted" is a bad IT person, different story.

    41. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked for a small company -exactly- like that. I not just had to log minutes on my phone, but the manager wanted to watch people's screens via some remote app, and if you made a single typo, he would demand you do your work in a conference room or an office, so he can come in and bellow at you more easily. I was doing 100+ hours a week as an IT person, and it wasn't IT work. It was conference bridge after conference bridge where all people did was bicker and try to get their pet project in.

      The entire place had complete Stockholme syndrome. In fact, when I told the manager to fire me on the spot if he didn't like something, he went into the passive/aggressive, "nobody has ever spoken to me like that, there will be consequences to pay for that" mode. In a small company with people who were VERY intelligent and knew their stuff, they were all scared as shit of this guy. None of them planned a single weekend outing other than when on vacation, because they likely would be called in to work at anytime.

      My doctor told me that I'd be dead by the end of the year if I continued to work there due to the stress alone.

      Needless to say, a couple weeks later, an offer of employment came to me from another company. The manager at that place refused my two weeks notice, so I made it an effective immediately notice.

      It was a big pay cut. Hurt like hell. The new job's commute blows goats as well. However, I actually look forward to go to work now.

    42. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sh!t, don't tell me Jeremiah A. has struck again. That little pig cost me my job and much more.

    43. Re:Leave. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Those of us who have worked in IT long enough have met many "superstar" engineers who have worked there for decades and have a reputation for abusive behavior. Businesses tend to tolerate it because the superstar both "works hard" (that is, they put in a lot of hours), they produce results, and more importantly they're the only people who really know how their code works.

      The submitter doesn't state anywhere whether they have more or less experience than the superstar, incidentally.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    44. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably your best option. I was once a tech lead on a small team where two of the team members couldn't get along and work together. It wasn't gaslighting but just a straight personality conflict. We were missing deadlines, so the project manager and I had several meetings with them both individually and as a group. Eventually, we had to kick it up to our manager. They took one of the conflicting parties out of the team, which solved the immediate problem. But in the next round of job cuts, BOTH were let go.

      This is a situation where even if you succeed solving the conflict, you fail.

    45. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been in this situation and a) you're absolutely doomed and b) telling management why you're leaving will help nobody you care about and management won't believe you anyway.

    46. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can personally attest I've been a victim of this. It doesn't just affect individuals in an organization and sometimes a whole corporate structure can have this sort of rot. It's usually a symptom of organizations that have lost steam and don't have clearly defined products, or they have products that are stagnating in the marketplace. Couple this with a corporate culture of "promotion over everything else" and you end up with a body of engineers screwing each other over just to stay alive. It's the Hunger Games of the programming industry.

      Let me re-iterate the above poster - this will be extraordinarily unsettling. It does bad things to you in terms of your career and as a person. It harms your well-being and health.

      Question your motives: What do you value as a developer? Decide if your intent is right. If you intent is right but your company doesn't validate it then move on. Leave. A company that doesn't appreciate what you bring to the table isn't worth your time. They'll try to instill professional ideals that will work against you in the long term. Once you compromise your standards as a professional there isn't any going back.

      I've been there. I've worked for companies that would sell your grandmother to make a buck. I've worked for companies that would rather you lie, cheat and steal to make one more customer. Each following company asks for more of that then some more.

      Once you commit to building shit you'll be shoveling it forever. Refuse to do so, and leave. There will always be someone to take your place but that's just a sad reality of the modern world. There's always someone willing to sell out.

    47. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work as a developer at a place where we hired this Australian piece of shit on a work visa. He used to whine to the guys in charge because I came in to work at 10:00 instead of 8:00 when he came in. Despite the fact that I put in 10 hour days every day and he barely did 7 a day, they chose to listen to him and wanted me to come in at 8:00, even though I had been coming in at 10:00 for the previous two years. I ended up quitting and finding another job that not only paid more but gave me a lot more flexibility on my hours, so I suppose I owe kangaroo-boy a thank you.

    48. Re:Leave. by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

      But eventually, it piles up and *someone* notices.

      So much this. People I know who have been sexually harassed at work and their boss doesn't realize it's really happening until the accused person starts saying "I was accused of this before and it's obviously absurd..."

      --
      Real lawyers write in C++
    49. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People give advice to the problem as described by op. There is nothing in it to suggest op is delusional, so we won't imagine it there out of thin air. Abusive colleagues exist in real world and unresponsive management is not an exception.

      Besides, even if he would be petulant, leaving wont harm the company un question.

      Btw, if everyone around you is petulant and oversensitive, then it is likely you not them who is the abusive jerk.

    50. Re:Leave. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I moved on because of a Gaslighting colleague. My on exit interview was conducted by the Gaslighter himself. It was great being able to tell him exactly what I thought of him and him having to minute it :D

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    51. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell was that company? they sound like a bunch of psychopaths! How can they ever expect to run a successful business by making their own employees feel like abused workers blackmailed into staying.

    52. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What should you do when the gaslighter inevitably claims that all your documentation is "out of context"?

    53. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how will things ever change?
      There is another way, one which is as old as anything.

      There's a reason you're in the company, even if you're a contractor, there's someone there who support you, who wanted you in. Probably, these people are not too happy with status quo and wanted something else. This is at least one leader/manager, maybe more, and hopefully also a coworker or more (ie. de-facto/ad-hoc leaders in some cases).

      Next thing, don't do "official" too much, but make sure you get everything said and decided in writing (email is good enough). If the other parties don't send you the text, then you send them the meeting minutes or what you talked about in the hallway. Keep those emails as a backup. If the place is any good, you don't really need'em, but it helps to back up and remember the words said. If they don't reply, it's assumed acceptance of what you wrote.

      Remember that being negative will easily reflect back to the person being negative. Use that to your advantage and keep a low profile.

      So if not "official", what then? Talk with your coworkers that support you! These people may understand the difficulty and find solutions. Maybe you can work on something else or somewhere else within the company. Probably there should be limited contact with the person. It's well known some people don't get along, and if you manage to get around this, you'll get kudos for finding solutions to problems and being professional about it. But you need to get out of the aim, stop being a target somehow.

      If all fails, read about "grey rock", and apply it.

      If even this doesn't work, escalate above your leader.

      Still not working, search for other jobs but don't give up any rights unnecessarily.

      It's hard, but doable. You need to find the right people to support and guide you. You got the job in the first place and will get benefit of the doubt no matter what some duchbag (that just 5% of the people see through) might say about you.

    54. Re:Leave. by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, with no documented explanation, it's very easy to blame the problems on the guy who is "no longer with the company", blackball him, and move on with no improvement. Saying just a name to HR does nothing, as it doesn't provide any context in which to investigate. In a large company, it may be the first time the interviewer has heard the name, and the guy leaving tomorrow will work with a different interviewer, so it'll never be correlated.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    55. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >only requires that you express untrue, damaging things to someone other than the party you are referring to

      With the intent to cause damage. Look it up. They damaged party has to prove intent. Which is why there are almost never successful; libel or slander cases in the US.

    56. Re:Leave. by lrichardson · · Score: 1

      I had a situation where someone went out of their way to backstab me, from outright lies in the HR 'Peer Review' system, to attacking me in a large meeting for a program of mine that crashed, claiming she had told me to fix it months ago.

      Took all of about three minutes to hack the HR system. Discovered other people had complained about this individual - repeatedly - for lying.

      The version control system showed the fix I *had* implemented had been removed ... while I was on vacation, by this individual.

      End result? After showing all this to my boss ... nothing. I lasted one year at this place. My health suffered. Evidence didn't matter. And the individual is still there, 26 years. Toxic as heck. I've spoken to others who left because of her. Again, emails, evidence ... nothing happens. Don't know why HR goes out of their way to continually dump 'the troublemakers', when they all are having trouble with the same individual.

      Not to say documenting things isn't a great idea - it is - but, often, HR simply doesn't want to do anything, because that would be an admission there *was* a problem ... and that alone can come back and be used against them in court.

      One addition - put down in email anything that is done over the phone ... 'just to confirm my understanding of our conversation'. I've dealt with a few individuals who use the phone, almost exclusively, as a means to prevent their own accountability.

    57. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because Australians get special exception when they come to work in the US...

      Seriously, are you a retard or something?

    58. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he is the gaslighter. He could be suffering from multiple personality disorder. Like that new movie from M. Night called Split.

      Hehe, I know this is a serious thread but I had to inject a little humor, sorry.

    59. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will pay for this HACK MAN!!!!! - Christopher Reeves.

    60. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Kobe Bryant of the Lakers is another great example. His teammates hated playing with him, but he produced championships. It caused Shaq to be traded to the Miami Heat.

      He was the Lakers golden boy, and in the Bus(Owners of Lakers) family eyes he could do no wrong.

    61. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We found the gaslighter boys. Problem is he's an AC like myself ;(.

    62. Re: Leave. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I know you're kidding, but a number of others aren't and are claiming much the same thing, and I'm wondering what the point would be. The submitter doesn't name names, name the company, or produce any other identifying information. And even if we presume that the submitter is lying about something we literally will never know anything about, it's still an interesting question!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    63. Re: Leave. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the best defense is offense. Time to turn up the heat on the gaslighter. Of course you could always leave but it seems like there is at least one gaslighting asshole in every company. I have a gaslighter the taste of their own medicine. I thoroughly enjoyed watching the gaslighter squirm.

    64. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which exchange? I'm interviewing at an exchange next week!

    65. Re: Leave. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      People whose skills suck, often have no clue.

      You might suck, I might suck, there is no way to know based on a few /. posts.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    66. Re: Leave. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Very few people _think_ they are performing poorly. Every blithering incompetent I've ever known, thought they were being gaslighted.

      Those that are marginal, will know they need to improve. But those truly in the shitter, won't have a clue.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    67. Re: Leave. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The old rule of threes (If you have the same problem with three associates; GFs, bosses, coworkers) has limits around toxic cultures. Some places are full of shitheads.

      Manipulative managers at B and C organizations sometime build stable workforces by deliberately putting the entire staff into a deeply depressed rut. The tell on this is they are trying to convince you 'it like this everywhere'. Also the manager will likely have a marketing background, those fuckers think they have on up on techs because they are better manipulators. In those cases, it is a fair bet that neither the gaslighter nor the complainer are actually all that competent. I'd guess the short timer is more competent, but that might not be saying much.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    68. Re:Leave. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      It seems like the smaller Tech companies do this more than the big ones when it comes to extreme micromanagement. Im not surprised that there isn't someone with a similar or even worse experience.

      They didn't have anything logging our screens. (as far as I know, but I built my PC's OS image, had full admin on the systems, and was their senior AV tech. I could smell screen scraping and rootkits a mile away so I was pretty sure my pc's was clear at least.) I was Pretty positive they were logging DNS entries and Internet. They had cameras in the building but they were only watching the entry points cause just about everybody would have quit on the spot if they put cameras on us. Pretty sure the few cams they had had mic's on them. One former employee was convinced the building was Mic'd either through the cams, the phone system or both. I even called them on it and when I brought up our state's wiretapping policy (which covers listening devices and recording without being informed) we got a new employee handbook that pretty much confirmed that they were doing it.

      In our state (Pennsylvania by the way), they also had laws governing overtime. you couldn't have more than two people on Salary at any one time. They had to take us all off of salary and moved us to Hourly because of it. I was averaging about 60 hours. Server admin was pushing 80+. I was trying to take stuff off of him when I could but most of his stuff towards the end was exchange migrations from SBS and he was the only guy that had any success with that and I was forced to pretty much live at the customer with the scissor lift because they had 100+ mission critical Thin clients running their industrial complex and no one on staff that could fix anything so they had us on full contract. If anything broke from the entire internet down to this machine froze we need someone to hold the power button in for 6 seconds I had to do a 20 minute onsite. They eventually had me going there every morning so they didn't have to pay me mileage. We should have never took that client and before the micromanagement when into full steam they were the #1 reason I was going to leave that place. They were #2 when I left.

      Our overtime justified adding a new employee. So they tried. I say tried because in Western Pennsylvania it's pretty rural and either the North south or West CIties would suck out the talent. I came from a college with 11 Years of client administration, repair and AV removal under our belt. The Server admin came from another Tech company from the south and had a lot of experience with repair and knew what he was doing. We also had two web coders on site doing site creation. one was let go. the other eventually went west to do DBA work which freed up money for more techs. The two owners (the managers) decided to move to the Carolinas for some reason in which one did tech work so we were saddled with his work as well. Guy #1 was a guy from a CSR shop. CSR killed his brain so he was let go. Guy #2 admined for a county courthouse and was good, but slower than us. they put the Micromanagement Screw to him and he walked out. Guy #3 was another CSR but with a brain. They MM him so bad he wasn't sleeping because of the Anxiety Meds his doctor had to put him on and he Walked. Guy #4 came straight from college and was very green so they hired Guy #5 that worked for the Volunteer fire dept and knew some tech but was perfect because he was great with the front desk and would shield the customers from us that were stressed to the point that we didn't care anymore. Also Keep in mind that all this hiring was roughly over a period of 1 year.

      Anyway whenever they hired someone they would put pressure on both me and the server admin about time, and our answers were always "we can't get the techs up to speed because once we do they leave." That didn't work for them. Guy #3 I pretty much had trained for the big site and even his mother worked there so it was perfect. Two weeks later he was gone and his mother told me about the stress. This is was made the MM tha

    69. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's the little stories like these which remind me that for its faults at least I live in a country where things like constructive dismissal exist and are valid options for most people. The US work culture (for employees, freelancers and bosses seem to get respect as they are 'self-made' and therefore morally superior) might as well be north korea's.

    70. Re:Leave. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      you never have anything to lose by documenting valid reasons you left a company

      You should assume that anything you write to anyone in the company you leave will soon be public knowledge. It will get back to the person you're complaining about, and if he's vindictive, you may be facing physical violence or other problems.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    71. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I hacked the HR system..."

      I stopped reading there.

      You are an unethical shitbag and a criminal. You are the fucking problem. Whatever wrongs that you convinced yourself to be the victim of were the deluded ramblings of an egomaniac.

    72. Re: Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice of you to take a break from your hourly angry Trump masturbation sessions to keep us up-to-date.

      Not sure if you noticed, but the rest of the world moved on. You lost. Deal with it.

    73. Re:Leave. by wwphx · · Score: 1

      In May, my boss came in to my office and said my contract wasn't being renewed. I said that was OK, I hadn't been terribly happy there for a while and I was almost done with the project. I thought I was there for the long haul, apparently not. It was a school, and all employees are on annual contracts, so your job may be terminated any year.

      What I hated was the duplicity. They later told my boss that I was a temporary hire. Funny, they didn't tell me that in my interview. And they didn't tell him when he took over the unit. Or the guy who hired me. Or me when I was hired. Or signed all of my paperwork. Or when my contract was renewed. Or in my termination paperwork. Had I known it was a temporary role, I wouldn't have bought a new car last year. They told the state unemployment office that "they had no more work for me." I have since learned that this is not unusual behavior for them, sort of like what our next Commander In Chief's reputation is like with contractors. I had two more projects lined up, one that could be done in about a month, one that was a major rewrite and would take about six months. Plus a total system replacement that, when done, would save the school about $3,000 a year in licensing alone, plus expanded and improved asset tracking throughout the school that would reduce a major amount of paperwork and footwork. AND they scrapped the database that I'd been developing for two years -- it never saw the lite of day. I wasted two years of my life in a job that produced absolutely nothing.

      But what do I know, I've only been working with databases for 25 years.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    74. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about law in any of the US, but in the UK: a private letter is considered to be "published", for libel purposes, the moment it is opened (by someone other than the party being libelled, or someone acting as their agent and with their express permission to open it).

      So yes, a letter to your company's HR dept could certainly be considered libellous of a third party.

    75. Re:Leave. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
      ;-) I had a similar reaction.

      How about this for a product idea? A little cheatsheet of some of techniques along with actual examples from people that have been in the news. Whenever a politician or mediaslut starts talking (mr trump doesn't have a monopoly on dementia) I want to be able to look at my list and go:
      • Projection. Check.
      • Gish Gallop. Check.
      • Overt threats. Check.
      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    76. Re:Leave. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      With the intent to cause damage. Look it up. They damaged party has to prove intent. Which is why there are almost never successful; libel or slander cases in the US.

      This is not true. At least in most states, intent to harm is not required.

      What IS usually required is to show that the accused knew, or reasonably should have known, that the statement was false.

      That is not quite the same thing.

    77. Re:Leave. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I don't know about law in any of the US, but in the UK: a private letter is considered to be "published", for libel purposes, the moment it is opened (by someone other than the party being libelled, or someone acting as their agent and with their express permission to open it)

      Yes. It is roughly the same in the U.S. See HERE, in the section headed "Publication".

    78. Re:Leave. by Rexel99 · · Score: 1

      Just to take a quick alternate view on informing the company about the problem.... why?
      Why spend more hours giving this info to managers who are currently not prepared to know or understand the current organisation, culture and situation?
      Why take this time to guide a company you no longer work for to develop and improve them?
      Why help your likely future opposition?
      The one positive from doing it is that it is cathartic, you get it out of your head and perhaps you feel like you have accomplished something, but the physical result would be minimal. Harder yet is not being personally critical of those people and situations in the future, so it's something you can learn from, understand and see the signs earlier next time but unless you are there as the business consultant and restructuring 'head hunter' then it's actually not so much your responsibility to fix and even less your place to tell 'all knowing' managers what they are doing wrong.
      Don't burn your bridges, just leave with a smile and move on happier elsewhere.

    79. Re:Leave. by chester_br · · Score: 1

      Another one on the Leave camp. One thing is when someone inadvertently starts to do it (and you may be in a position to give them constructive feedback). Another is when they keep on doing it, and no one on the powers that be realizes. Happened at an otherwise great workplace - at least two other very competent people left, and made it clear on their exit interviews that the person's toxic behaviour (which I just learned to have a term for) was the cause. Since then, the person has been promoted for their "loyalty", no matter how obvious it gets that they get zero things accomplished and cause talent to bleed, so no regrets.

    80. Re:Leave. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It'd be an interesting idea, but could you make money on it, and then immediately be cast as the pro something and anti something else, because the world you're stepping in everything is binary, ever since the Republicans straight jacketed candidates with "you are with us or against us" in getting all republicans to support their planks.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    81. Re:Leave. by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

      It is not defamation/ libel if it is true.
      Truth is always an absolute defence.

      --
      New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
    82. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, better to leave sometimes. I worked at a company that vastly undervalued my skills and had me do endless gruntwork on their ill-conceived systems. I got very little recognition and was made to feel like I was overpaid for what I did. Finally I looked in the mirror one day and said fuck this, I know I am better than this. I found a job where they not only value my contributions they consider me a ninja. So yeah, get the fuck out of the hell hole and find a better place to work is a good plan!

    83. Re:Leave. by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      The company is a simple mom and pop Tech Company. The owners were literally husband and wife. The Husband knew tech and understood its complexities. The Wife understood finances. Pretty sure neither of them knew how to manage.

      My previous job before the tech company was at a College for about 11 years. I enjoyed it for 9 years until the president was given a vote of no confidence and was replaced by another president that wanted to basically turn us into the college he came from. He fired the CIO after he set him up to fail and literally replaced him with his brother in law. the New CIO got my boss to retire and started to screw over my performance by promoting someone who had no idea what was going on in my old boss's position. Since I was already doing the job of two techs, (since they fired one of them) dealing with my mom's terminal illness at the time and forced me to read This and write a book report on it, (which I did. Looking back it probably helped me in the second job. I pretty much was Dr Gregory House M.D. in the emergency room when it came to demeanor with students.) I switched to the tech company I've been talking about. For what it's worth the college's sysadmin quit the same day I did and I had no idea until he walked into HR the same time I did. All in all when the President started there was 11 people in IT at this college. When I left, only 1 of the original team of 11 was still there and over 1/3 of the entire college staff retired, quit or was fired over a 1 year period. Since then my replacement i trained quit. The Boss's Replacement Quit. They went through Two sysadmins with a third that I heard quit right on the spot on the first day, and the CIO brother in law followed the president to be VP of IT of the college the president eventually switched to. I'm sure their college's IT dept is having the same fun ride I went through.

      The first few years of the tech company I enjoyed. it was easy work, There was no MicroManagement for me or the server admin, (although I heard the Web Devs were MMd to death during that time) the customers were better to deal with than some of the students and i got real close with the employees. It was when we started to expand that it got nerve wracking. it was about that time they they started squeezing the stone to try to get blood to come out of it, and they got happy when it started bleeding not realizing that the blood was coming from their hand and not the stone.

      My current job is at a K-12 school. The only reason I got this job was probably from the references I put from the college years since the IT team have stayed close through the years. Even with all of the chaos, screaming kids, and working in between, it's not as bad because there isn't any MicroManagement or work to death conditions yet. If and when that happens I can assure you I'll be out of there.

    84. Re:Leave. by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      From my own experience, it's an exercise in professionalism, extinguishing the bridges that are burning without your knowledge.

      The key (that is apparently missed elsewhere in this discussion) is to maintain absolute professionalism. The letter is not just whining. It is a dissection of the factors that forced you out of the company. It serves as an explanation of your actions to the people who would otherwise be left with questions that would be answered with rumors, often spread by the bully himself.

      Until you walk out the door (or otherwise enact termination), you still work for the company. Your job doesn't end when you decide you're leaving. Right up to that last minute, you're still a part of the team, and they're still expecting you to help the company improve. While it can also be cathartic to say "fuck you all" and sit idly waiting for that two-weeks-notice paycheck, that leaves a very bad final impression on your colleagues. While they might end up being your opposition next month, they might also be your reference (or recruiter) next year.

      When that time comes that others think back on you, will they recall a embittered man who just gave up and left, or will they remember the guy whose last act was a professional attempt to point out the proverbial elephant in the room? While the managers are ultimately responsible for the decisions (right or wrong), very few are actually all-knowing, even in their own minds. Rather, they have their particular perception, and a sufficiently manipulative employee can control their perspective and prevent them from ever seeing the unethical behavior. While it is not your place to tell management what they're doing wrong, it is your place to ensure that they accurately see the effects of their decisions. They can decide for themselves if it matches their expectations and other employees' descriptions.

      It is not enough to "leave with a smile" any more. Now recruiters look at LinkedIn to see if you play well with others, and referrals from past colleagues is the easy way through the HR bureaucrats. Now, the best way to ensure your bridges aren't burning is to try to leave your colleagues with the understanding that you hold no hard feelings toward them, but only the environment you worked under.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    85. Re:Leave. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      But I think I see now where you got the idea intent to harm came into play.

      In order for a public figure to prevail in a libel suit, they must show actual malice.

      But usually they do not. Public figures are the exception. Most defamation suits are by and against just regular people.

    86. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mention name.
      Just say, that 'someone' did it. It will be up to employer to count 2+2

    87. Re:Leave. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Truth is usually very tedious and expensive to prove in court.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    88. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is all good. The comment about glassdoor.com is especially good advice.

      BUT! After all that is done, MOVE ON quickly and thoroughly. Don't think of the old job and don't dwell on anything like "I wish I had said..." or any of that stuff. Take the time every day to remind yourself that that bad part of your life is OVER and you need to get those a**holes out of your head.

      Living well is the best revenge!!

    89. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for a small company -exactly- like that. I not just had to log minutes on my phone, but the manager wanted to watch people's screens via some remote app, and if you made a single typo, he would demand you do your work in a conference room or an office, so he can come in and bellow at you more easily. I was doing 100+ hours a week as an IT person, and it wasn't IT work. It was conference bridge after conference bridge where all people did was bicker and try to get their pet project in.

      The entire place had complete Stockholme syndrome. In fact, when I told the manager to fire me on the spot if he didn't like something, he went into the passive/aggressive, "nobody has ever spoken to me like that, there will be consequences to pay for that" mode. In a small company with people who were VERY intelligent and knew their stuff, they were all scared as shit of this guy. None of them planned a single weekend outing other than when on vacation, because they likely would be called in to work at anytime.

      My doctor told me that I'd be dead by the end of the year if I continued to work there due to the stress alone.

      Needless to say, a couple weeks later, an offer of employment came to me from another company. The manager at that place refused my two weeks notice, so I made it an effective immediately notice.

      It was a big pay cut. Hurt like hell. The new job's commute blows goats as well. However, I actually look forward to go to work now.

      I was in EXACTLY the same situation. I just started in the company at a bottom-job position but I made it as the SOLE IT guy there. I built the WHOLE office network infrastructure for all the people there. I even got a Microsoft partnership started. In addition to my main job, I had to do the IT job for a 50+ colleagues office. My "team-leader" was paid more than everyone else (of course, even though he denied it on every occasion) but the only job he had was to micromanage all the other workers. It got to the point where I was asked that every day I needed to fill in a paper with every place I drove (I had a company car), even though I used that car only to get to work and back home.
      Meanwhile I was pulling in so many hours per week (12H per day including commute) that the only thing I got to eat something more than half a sandwich was evenings when I got home. And even then, I was so tired that I often fell asleep during supper. I was paid exactly as much as my colleagues and I got screamed at when the colleagues came to work with a USB stick or something that had a virus and I had to spend a few hours after work to sort things out.
      After a year and a few months, I told them that I either want a raise (that was actually promised as I started the job in the first place) or I cannot do both things at once. My request was obviously refused, on the grounds that I "wasn't consistent" in my main job (not the IT part). It seems they didn't trust me enough. I resigned on the spot.
        I gave all of my "IT responsibilities" to an asshole colleague that came after me in the company. A week later I was on the west coast of France where I spent a whole month doing mostly nothing (I'm from Germany). I got back home and found a job really fast. I took quite a pay cut, but at least I was in a company where I had a LOT of room to grow and I was appreciated for my hard work.
      I later found out that the colleague I left in my place had been stealing large amounts of money from them.
      A year later the company went bankrupt and the colleagues fragmented into other small firms actually getting all the clients.

      P.S. I heard I even got blamed when a list that was hosted on my google account got deleted (not by me) loooong after I left.

    90. Re:Leave. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The whole nation has been living in la-la land ever since the federal debt hit $10T. Everyone knows that it's now just a case of pushing the day of reckoning further and further down the road via things like artificially inflated bubble stock markets and hoping for unicorns outnumbering black swans.

      More than half the population is receiving benefits, less than half the population is working (see here), and it's just going to get worse as more "good quality" jobs disappear.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    91. Re: Leave. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you seem to be confused. Hillary was in the Democratic party, and her campeign was the one inciting violence at other candidate's rallies.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    92. Re:Leave. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.

    93. Re:Leave. by khayman80 · · Score: 1

      Regarding recent Hausfather et al. paper, which is the source of the latest hype about "no pause": As Anthony Watts points out, the study only goes to 2015, and the middle of its strong El Nino. If it had gone to the present, after record cooling, it would show less or no overall warming. Quote Watts: "Personally, it looks like ignoring the most current data available for 2016, which has been cooling compared to 2015, invalidates the claim right out of the gate" Here's the quote and some other criticisms of Hausfather et al. dailycaller.com/2017/01/05/new-study... [Lonny Eachus, 2017-01-11]

      No. When Hausfather et al. 2017 was published (long after it was submitted) the most current available NOAA data ended in November 2016. Nick Stokes showed that even if Hausfather et al. had used a time machine to include those data when submitting their paper, it would have showed more warming. Even the silly opinion piece Lonny linked notes that "climate models will more closely match observations once 2016 data is included".

      ... its conclusions might have been different after the record cooling we've seen, post- El Nino. [Lonny Eachus, 2017-01-11]

      Ironically, Zeke Hausfather showed that including all the 2016 data available at publication actually increases the observed warming trends compared to their paper's conclusions using data through 2015. This is still true using the full 2016 NOAA data which just became available on January 18. Lonny could verify this by repeating these least squares trend estimates with the monthly data, or just noticing that the annual ocean average was even higher in 2016 than in 2015. Zeke Hausfather challenged Anthony Watts to find an ocean temperature record that was cooler on average in 2016 than in 2015. Watts couldn't name one or bring himself to retract his claim. Can Lonny?

      ... Personally, it looks like ignoring the most current data available for 2016, which has been cooling compared to 2015, invalidates the claim right out of the gate. ... the data only goes to December 2015. They've missed an ENTIRE YEAR's worth of data... Looks like a clear case of cherry picking to me, by not using all the available data. ... [Anthony Watts, 2017-01-04]

      Watts accuses Hausfather et al. of ignoring the most current data and missing an ENTIRE YEAR's worth of data. Since Hausfather et al. 2017 was submitted in early 2016, they'd have needed a time machine to include the ENTIRE YEAR's worth of data that Watts accused them of ignoring and missing. In contrast, Sou notes that Anthony Watts presented an AGU poster in 2015 without data from 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, or 2009.

      Global Warming Lies: thinkprogress.org/climate... "It's Happening Now"
      No, it isn't. NO warming

    94. Re:Leave. by khayman80 · · Score: 1

      There is no way to trace what they did, no way to confirm their methods. Sadly the masses are not equipped to scrutinize the nonsense. [Steve A Morris, 2017-01-11]

      You can trace what Hausfather et al. 2017 did by downloading the code they made freely available at bit.ly/2jXSy7G. You can confirm their methods by reading the full paper and following the links at the end which lead to all the data they used. Interested members of the public can read or watch the background they shared.

      ... they simply don't use 1/3 of the ARGO datasets because its data is "more ambiguous". Translation: "It doesn't fit our needs." [Lonny Eachus, 2017-01-11]

      Read the paper to see if Lonny's "translation" is reasonable: "... Two of the three Argo near-SST records assessed, APDRC and H2008, agree well with the buoy-only and satellite-based records and suggest a cool bias in ERSSTv3b during the 2005-2015 period, when sufficient Argo data are available (Fig. 3). The RG2009 series is more ambiguous, with trends that are not significantly different (P > 0.05) from either ERSSTv3b or ERSSTv4. ..."

      Lonny Eachus is wrong to claim that Hausfather et al. "simply don't use 1/3 of the ARGO datasets" (presumably a reference to RG2009). They used 3 independent Argo near-SST (near sea surface temperature) datasets, and reported the results from all 3 datasets. Anyone who reads the full paper will see that they mention RG2009 a total of 17 times while reporting the results of using that dataset.

      ... the study's argument is rather weak. ARGO data has best coverage, best instruments. Yet they arbitrarily throw out 1/3 of the ARGO data sets because they don't agree with their preconceptions. ... In sum, it appears that this paper committed the same likely error as Karl et al. That is to say: ignoring arguably better data because it doesn't fit their preconceptions. [Lonny Eachus, 2017-01-11]

      Wrong. Hausfather et al. didn't "throw out" or "ignore" 1/3 of the Argo datasets. Look at figure 3 (backup). They show the results of all three Argo datasets, including four instances using the RG2009 dataset which Lonny baselessly accuses them of "arbitrarily throwing out" and "ignoring".

      Paper: (1) "We constructed our own data set from other data sets." (2) Oops. But we left some out. "(3) "We find MOST of the data we used does not match our new contrived data set. So we will ignore it." [Lonny Eachus, 2017-01-11]

      Again, Hausfather et al. didn't "leave out" or "ignore" the RG2009 dataset. Look at figure 4 (backup). They show the results of all 3 Argo datasets, including the RG2009 dataset which Lonny baselessly accuses them of "ignoring".

      Figure 4 examines four composite SST records: ERSSTv4, ERSSTv3b, HadSST3, and COBE-SST. These composite SST records are compared to instrumentally homogenous datasets (which just means "from a single type of instrument"): b

  2. This is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The submission adds that "Raising things through the official channels is out of the question, as is confronting the colleague in question directly

    If you're not willing to use official channels and you're not willing to confront the person directly then you need to leave. That's it.

    1. Re:This is simple by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The submission adds that "Raising things through the official channels is out of the question, as is confronting the colleague in question directly

      If you're not willing to use official channels and you're not willing to confront the person directly then you need to leave. That's it.

      In fact, the post unintentionally answered its own question:

      Raising things through the official channels is out of the question, as is confronting the colleague in question directly as he is considered something of a superstar engineer who has been in the company for decades and has much more influence than any ordinary engineer." So leave [your best suggestions]

    2. Re:This is simple by schnell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're not willing to use official channels and you're not willing to confront the person directly then you need to leave. That's it.

      Precisely. However, you really need to question whether the original poster's two above assertions are true, or if they are just conflict avoidant/unable to understand corporate culture. Because if those aren't the case and the two assertions above are true, then the company is a toxic shithole that should be avoided like the plague.

      The implication that you can't use official channels - even "skipping levels" up - indicates that the whole place is thoroughly corrupt through to the very very top. Saying that you can't talk to the person directly implies that they are so menacing/terrible/powerful that asserting yourself against a bully could never work.

      Unless this is a small family owned business and the offender in question is part of the family, do both of these situations both sound likely?

      I'm certainly not trying to impugn the submission poster, but it sounds fishy to me that this company is so rotten that none of the two most obvious approaches are even possible. I've never met a corporate HR department (at least at a company big enough to actually have legal counsel retained) that wasn't ready to jump all over any accusation of misconduct because they're so eager to fend off potential lawsuits. And any company where everyone - including the HR department and the org chain all the way up to the CEO - is totally off limits to a complaint about a malevolent employee is either a nepotism factory or a 100% nest of vipers.

      I can't assess better than anyone else the validity of what the submitter says, but it does sound to me like some of the options he/she thinks are off limits might actually be on the table but he/she is too young/shy/lacking in self confidence to pursue. But if those things really are out of the question, then run don't walk out the door.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    3. Re:This is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly having to post AC because I've already moderated in this thread, but about ten years ago I worked for a company where this was most definitely the case, and it ran to 400 people. Not huge, but a world-famous name in its field of specialist technical equipment. Our boss (technical director of our division's hardware & software design team) was probably a sociopath and abused his staff daily, but was untouchable because he was the CEO's pet. (The CEO himself was probably a narcissist.) The so-called HR department was one woman: the CEO's PA, and she wasn't even competent at that. You get the picture.

      I agree with everyone who says the OP should leave. Very few other approaches are likely to work.

    4. Re: This is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being able to skip channel does not mean the whole org is evil. The step up just might be in denial or does not like solving conflicts like this. Or might be longtime friend of the person in question. All of those are pretty normal in average organization. All organization have some dysfunction and none is perfect.

      Technically good developer micromanaging or abusing juniors with petty complains is nothing unheard of either.

      It is attitude like yours that enable it. Yes, senior is better. No, not every single detail junior did was wrong and not every single of his ideas was stupid.

    5. Re:This is simple by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Corollary of the Peter principle, don't recall it's name: 'When a person has reached their level of incompetence, at some level they know it, so they surround themselves with other incompetents, so they can hide. These incompetents will do the same.'

      Either the submitter is actually an idiot, or the place he is working has a 'king/queen idiot'. If there is a king/queen idiot, unless you are at or above their level, it is hopeless, leave before the place falls in on itself. If the submitter is the idiot, it will take a few places before that knowledge will get through the denial, if it ever does.

      If you find a company in this situation at the highest level, it might be an opportunity. Think entrepreneurially.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:This is simple by KC0A · · Score: 1

      The OP's tale is completely believable. In a small company, "all the way up to the very top" isn't very far. Incompetent sociopaths will protect themselves vigorously against more capable and assertive newcomers. I've seen this several times in a long career. The incumbent knows that their market value outside of his present position is about zero, and they will consciously or unconsciously drive away anyone who comes in with threatening new ideas, or anyone who has the potential to open management's eyes by outproducing them.

    7. Re:This is simple by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      Don't be afraid to follow official channels, even if you think they won't work. I had a supervisor several years ago who wanted to bring in his own team so he worked to undermine me. I worked directly with our client so they were aware of my value to the project. When my manager finally made his play, his boss came in to talk with me, and I explained my side of the situation. She seemed legitimately interested in what I had to say. She spoke with the client, and asked me to BCC her when I sent status reports to my PM. In comparing what I was reporting to what he was reporting about me, she had evidence that he was not being truthful about me, and he was removed from his position shortly thereafter. It was validating for me and a relief to the rest of the team.

    8. Re:This is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Saying that you can't talk to the person directly implies that they are so menacing/terrible/powerful that asserting yourself against a bully could never work."

      That never works unless you have any real power to assert. People don't change, and the personality type described does not recognize own faults. If it was just a random bully and you have some real ammo you might be able to maintain som kind of balance of terror. If he is formally or informally your superior at the company, there is no way that could improve things.

      Going upstream would be the only hope, but that is rarely a happy story. But start documenting in any case in case you have to.

  3. The way to deal with a bully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is to be a bigger bully. Or call on someone to be a bully for you. So figure it out, beat them back down, or cry out for someone to do it.

    1. Re:The way to deal with a bully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has to be said I'm kind of amazed nobody's suggested the traditional "Car park/tyre iron" solution.

    2. Re:The way to deal with a bully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it's not worth throwing away your entire life over a job.

  4. Quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tell them to Take this Job and Shove it. Fuck you Hitler, I'm outta here. Vote for a basic income so everyone has an exit strategy from capitalism and toxic workplaces. Tune in, turn on, drop out.

    1. Re:Quit. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      In this case and in this market, it almost aways is a, and THE option. Either the article poster is competent and can get a job, or he isn't and should stop complaining...

  5. Document everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the person truly feels under threat it's because they are not as good as everyone else thinks.

    Write every. single. thing. down.

    1. Re:Document everything by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Carry voice activated recorder at all times, for those Orders that never quite jib when the review starts
      Order from Amazon "Getting even, the handbook of dirty tricks", use it, but leave out the juvenile superglue gags
      DO use the lemon juice chair spring squeek enhancer trick, really, REALLY gets under the skin of any Type "A"
      A good old fashioned degausser can do wonders with their latest project, and leave no trail even if they have surveillance in the office itself (note, max range for an obfuscated hard drive is about 15 feet)
      Fun things to do with their email, assuming you put in the time to break their sign-in.
      Remember, old age and guile beats youth and capability EVERY time!

    2. Re:Document everything by blindseer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Write every. single. thing. down.

      This.

      People might not see paper as the end-all documentation that it used to be but it can be very helpful. This is especially true for something difficult to fake, like many lines of code that were written but "lost", as opposed to something easier to fake, like a date or name on a file.

      If policy allows then store electronic files in a way that cannot be easily accessed by even this "rock star". A SVN store where files are checked in could be manipulated by someone with the right access. A USB drive that you copy your files to, and kept in a locked drawer at your desk, is not so easily manipulated. Check your files in twice, once to the company store and again to your own SVN store on your USB drive.

      If possible put things in e-mail. If the "gaslighter" tells you something by phone or face to face that you believe will be contradicted later then put it in an e-mail to him and/or another coworker that is on the project, just do an "I'm following up on our earlier conversation" e-mail. If the "rock star" is going so far as to manipulate the e-mail servers then save the e-mails to a disk somewhere and/or print them out.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    3. Re:Document everything by Demena · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did and they were stolen from my locked desk draw. Stupid. I should have kept them at home.

    4. Re:Document everything by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      To what end?

      If management won't listen, they won't read either.

      So you can sue perhaps? It's still just "he said, she said."

      No, just leave.

    5. Re:Document everything by Elfich47 · · Score: 2

      If you have a written log that spans weeks or months, it becomes much harder to refute it. The written documentation has to be detailed enough to point to other documentation (commits, emails, other permanent records) and provide a road map so the lawyers can follow the log and subpoena the supporting documentation. The written log lives in your bag and never leaves your bag unless you are writing in it. IF you think something could be a threat to you for firing or lawsuit, you write about it in the log. A handwritten log, in ink is best. It cannot easily be modified after the fact. Hand date every page and hand number every page. It is much harder to replace pages after the fact if every page is dated and numbered.

      I was keeping a log this year against my supervisor. He was not acting as a project manager or an organized manager. If the shit hit the fan I could take the log out and start quoting chapter and verse on the times he failed in his role. Assuming he didn't have a competing log it is going to be very hard to compete with the written record. DO NOT SURRENDER THE ORIGINAL COPY TO ANYONE, unless ordered by a judge. If need be, provide full color copies of every page.

      While this is not a perfect system, if provides guideposts of what was happening when and why so if an argument comes up you can look back at your notes to remember what was going on.

      --
      Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    6. Re:Document everything by alzoron · · Score: 1

      If this other employee is changing computer files and settings then all the documentation he needs should be in the logs unless the company's setup is completely stupid and all the employees share the same login or something. In that case he should probably bail as soon as he can.

    7. Re:Document everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could get into legal problems if you take company source code and bring it home.

    8. Re: Document everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a lot of work, almost a second job, why not just leave and stick to doing one job with less hassle?

    9. Re:Document everything by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Write every. single. thing. down.

      This is good advice, but do not write it down on company computers (or keep an additional personal backup). There's a good chance Mr. Dickhead will be able to read it if it's on company computers.

    10. Re:Document everything by Demena · · Score: 1

      It was an academic position

    11. Re:Document everything by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      If you already work for an unreasonable company, what makes you think they'll read or trust your log? The only thing your log will get you...is fired.

      See, the problem is not that the facts aren't known. The problem is that management doesn't WANT to know the facts. Having reams of paper in front of them won't be in the least convincing to such people.

    12. Re:Document everything by Elfich47 · · Score: 1

      I haven't shared it with them. But I still have it in my back pocket in case there is a dispute.

      --
      Architectural plans are like computer source code with a couple of differences: You only compile once.
    13. Re:Document everything by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there's the issue right there. Academia, the most toxic workplace in America.

    14. Re:Document everything by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Well damn.
      I get one interesting and one Troll and I'm rated "Troll"?

  6. Quit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand it's not always an option but...
    This seems to be affecting your professional and personal life and you're pretty much saying there's not much to do with it.
    I hope you are able to find another job in your area because from my experience, quitting in such situations takes away a *ton* of stress from your life.
    Good luck!

  7. a singular bully or several? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    you say "colleague" then say "bullies". if it's only one, please state so. if more, how many more?

    1. Re:a singular bully or several? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's using it as a verb. For example: "This person bullies me every day."

    2. Re:a singular bully or several? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't parse the phrase "bullies unscheduling things you've scheduled". What does bullies mean in this context. How does one bully an inanimate object or thing? How can something be unscheduled if you've scheduled it?

    3. Re:a singular bully or several? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually cancel that: I think there must be an implicit comma between bully and unscheduling. My bad, carry on.

    4. Re:a singular bully or several? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a colloquial / idiomatic use (and quite approproate) use of the word "bullies".
      It means that there's a group mentality there that he's up against. Which means he'll
      get no HR support, no peer support, and no manager support. One guy lept 12 floors
      to his death leaving a wife and 2 young children behind. True story.

      These environments do exist, sadly.

      CAP === 'valets'

    5. Re:a singular bully or several? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      You bully an inanimate object or thing by bullying those responsible for the inanimate object or thing. It took me a little while to grasp the meaning at first, too. There are other people responsible for the things he scheduled, meetings for other people, other people whose timelines depend on when he does things, etc.

    6. Re: a singular bully or several? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      personally, it sounds like they're just a litle bitch...

    7. Re:a singular bully or several? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I can't parse the phrase "bullies unscheduling things you've scheduled". What does bullies mean in this context. How does one bully an inanimate object or thing? How can something be unscheduled if you've scheduled it?

      Read the man page for "at". Special attention to "atrm" or "at -d"

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re: a singular bully or several? by Matt.Battey · · Score: 1

      Good question here. I took a look at the linked blog post, and this sentence was a direct quote. Seems the article was written in plural, in specific form, which is different from the post...

    9. Re: a singular bully or several? by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      The confusion stems from the fact that a lot of the text comes from a definition of the term gaslighting from the linked blog post:

      "Gaslighting occurs at the workplace in the form of bullies unscheduling things youâ(TM)ve scheduled, misplacing files and other items that you are working on and co-workers micro-managing you and being particularly critical of what you do and keeping it under their surveillance. They are watching you too much, implying or blatantly saying that you are doing things wrong when, in fact, you are not. As you can see, this is a competitive maneuver, a way of making you look bad so that they look good;"

      So, the only behaviour listed that isn't from the blog post is the supposed over-critical code review.

      I can't see that there is any evidence either way between:
      - the submitter really is competent and the code criticism is unwarranted
      - this is the submitters first real job and the first real (valid) criticism he has received, and doesn't know how to deal with it

    10. Re:a singular bully or several? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      I'll give it a try by paraphrasing, based on my understanding of the phrase:
      "Malicious persons who are unscheduling things you've scheduled".

      Bullies => "malicious persons" is not a quite exact translation, but it should get the meaning across.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  8. Gas back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or leave.

  9. Best option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a new job

  10. Be patient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until they're away from the office for a while, maybe on vacation, and then while they can't interfere you switch everything to electric!

  11. What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    in these situations is murder them. I'll sneak into their house at night, while they are sleeping, and first I cut out their tongue. Then I stab them in the eyes, then I take two icepicks, and I jam them in their ears. With all of that complete, the next step involves me raping them in the mouth, butt, and/or vagina (if they have one). I leave them lying on the floor, and I steal all their valuables.

    I haven't been caught yet.

    1. Re:What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Listen to AC, submitter. He's the HR director at the company I work at.

    2. Re:What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno... that was my first thought but then I assumed that it was covered by "confronting the colleague directly", which has been ruled out. Maybe murder their friends and relatives one by one until they flee the country? Or murder someone else and frame the gaslighter for it?

    3. Re:What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is entirely possible to frame your gaslighting colleague for murder, even using Facebook Live! The trick is to get a physical voice manipulator, and change it to sound like your colleague. Then when you are torturing and killing other people, folks watching the broadcast will think it was the person you are framing. The trick is to use catch phrases or commonly used words that people know your colleague for.

      Now, this may seem to be a little passive-aggressive, but if done right, Mr. Gaslight will soon be in prison.

    4. Re:What I do by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You need to do a little more than that to make it believable. Break into his car and look for hair strands around the seatbelt and head rest area. Or get into his bathroom and find a brush or comb they use- the trash can in there is a gross but good place to look also. Sprinkle a few strands of hair on the corpses. You could also follow them to a hair cut but make sure you pull the hair apart to make it appear it came out in a struggle and not just cut off. You also want to rig something they use to cause it to scratch them somehow. Taking a screw loose on a desk or something. After you notice the scratch or them bitching about it, collect the removed skill cells and try to stuff them under the fingernails of the victim.

      Finally, you want to do something to make the person seem like he is loosing his marbles. Pay the local gang members to carjack him, shoot him up with heroin or some other street drug until he passes out, and leave him parked at a stop sign on a side street without taking anything from the car. Let him explain his DUI charge was someone else' fault.

    5. Re:What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What works best is slowly doing things that will make him lose his mind. Start slow by just moving pens and pencils around on his desk. Maybe tilt a pen by 17 degrees while he is in the bathroom or in a meeting. Then start putting papers in a slightly different order or place. Then break into his house and rearrange individual pieces of furniture, in small ways. Maybe tilt a picture by a few degrees, or move a chair 5-9 millimeters to the left. Stuff like that. Also, if he has an open bottle of water in his fridge, put LSD in it.

    6. Re:What I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I did with one of my bosses was I broke into her house, killed her puppies, and used their blood to repaint the walls in her kitchen. She had a mental breakdown after that. LOL.

    7. Re:What I do by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Too extreme. Put a NAMBLA sticker on his car.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  12. Document everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can understand somebody micromanaging too much, but actually misplacing files on purpose, blaming you for things that you didn't do or canceling meetings if they are not your direct boss? That is WAY out of line.

    Honestly, this kind of behaviour should be a major red flag to any other employee and especially to management. Consider whether you honestly want to work in an environment where this kind of shit happens. If the conclusion is "hell no", then document a few incidents, report them to management (keep records) and quit over it if no action is taken. I'd recommend this route.

    If you do decide to stay: gather as much proof as you can, document every single incident because people will not want to believe that their coworker would do this. You will need to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.

  13. works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    beat their ass after work in the parking lot

    1. Re:works for me by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

    2. Re:works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upside is you'll be able to do some post grad work while spending your time in prison.

      The downside is no one will hire you after. Well except maybe Starbucks.

    3. Re: works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't go to prison for assault unless you really fuck someone up.
      Usually just a week or two in holding.

    4. Re:works for me by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The upside is you'll be able to do some post grad work while spending your time in prison.

      The downside is no one will hire you after. Well except maybe Starbucks.

      What - the Russians won't? We've been lied to?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      Wrong, violence is never the answer unless it was the question to begin with.

      I have been in this exact situation and what I have learned is that if you truly are a good employee your reputation will follow you because nothing remains a secret forever. I had a supervisor who deleted my vacations from the schedule without telling me and then called me when i was out of town on my work phone going "We are wondering where you are!" I got in the habit of taking screenshots of the calendar application and auditing the accesses to key files that run the ticketing system so that It was clear that things had been manipulated when they had. Beyond this I got in the habit of hyper documenting meta data of projects I worked on, collected feedback directly from employees that I had worked with and had them communicate positive feedback to upper management bypassing the bad actor supervisor that had been a problem. Turns out that after I quit, the problems that they said I caused were traced back to that supervisor and he was fired. This was not very satisfying for me because I spent a lot of time out of a job but I did get into another field where I am now making more money than I ever would in that type of job and the naysayers at that company are none the wiser.

      Hang in there, and do not, under any circumstances resort to violence unless it is brought upon you first. Rule of thumb!

    6. Re:works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Escalation of conflict is sometimes appropriate action.

      If you never escalate it beyond what they have already escalated it to, or if you try to be the "bigger person" all that's going to happen is going to make them feel in control of the situation, because exactly what's fair game is on their turf.

      As soon as you escalate it to a new level, they'll lose their control. From there it's a simple matter of deal with additional escalation or whatever. You can slash their tires or perform any number of violent actions on them that can't necessarily be traced back to you. Either they'll escalate it more, in which case you can easily manipulate them into doing something stupid that management couldn't possibly ignore or they back off.

    7. Re:works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Escalation of conflict is sometimes appropriate action.

      If you never escalate it beyond what they have already escalated it to, or if you try to be the "bigger person" all that's going to happen is going to make them feel in control of the situation, because exactly what's fair game is on their turf.

      As soon as you escalate it to a new level, they'll lose their control. From there it's a simple matter of deal with additional escalation or whatever. You can slash their tires or perform any number of violent actions on them that can't necessarily be traced back to you. Either they'll escalate it more, in which case you can easily manipulate them into doing something stupid that management couldn't possibly ignore or they back off.

      Ok genius, two things you are mistaken about that would be endgame for them and end of job for you

      1- you get violent, the police get called you are fired.. end of line
      2- You assume that just because you don't get all mad, freak out and beat the shit out of them that you are not in control of the situation and that could mean any number of things but what it means in my case is that I take specific action (that is likely non violent unless they attack me.. if they attack me physically I will not only defend myself but probably break a bone of theirs to show them why you don't attack a 2nd degree black belt unless you want to get hurt badly and embarrassed at the same time.) This specific action might be a word that brings about an investigation into lies that they have propagated.. evidence coming out about their embezzlement of money from the company, it could mean their hard drive going tits up at just the wrong fucking time for their career to continue (like 3 minutes before a big presentation or my personal favorite.. All of the above at the same time 50 or so minutes after a heavy dose of ex-lax in their coffee causes their presentation to fail, their lies and crimes at the company becoming public knowledge, their hard drive going tits up and popping up malware with porn all over it in front of the presentation and all the sudden stress being too much for their bowels to contain the explosion of diahrea in front of everyone..

      tell me again how this makes me look weak???

      Moron!

      See how I dealt with your stupid bullshit? if you were in front of me you would have gotten schooled much much harder kid.. count your fucking blessings!

      Being the bigger person is not incompatible with not getting your due. Just because I don't just get angry like a fucking crybaby and start a violent confrontation that will end with security ending the scene doesn't mean weakness.. the fact that you are trying to say it does shows that you have some growing up to do. I know this as a boss now I would not hire you hearing that answer from you.

    8. Re: works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2nd degree black belt. Whooooooaaaaa Mr
      Big shot. You sound so fucking full of yourself. You sound like a fucking bully. Bring that second degree black belt around a bunch of real thugs and see what happens to ya.

  14. So in other words... by flopsquad · · Score: 2

    ... How do I deal with this outside the normal and accepted channels modern humans are expected to go through?

    Presuming you don't wish to do violence to his person or property... are you okay with marching into his office and beating the shit out of yourself?

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  15. Challenge to him a battle of wits by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2

    Two cups of wine, with a dash (or two) of Iocane powder.

    --
    -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    1. Re:Challenge to him a battle of wits by ckatko · · Score: 2

      You forgot the most important part. Slowly building an immunity to Iocane.

      You basically just committed a murder-suicide.

    2. Re:Challenge to him a battle of wits by ZipK · · Score: 1

      And if they've spent the last few years building up an immunity to Iocaine powder?

    3. Re:Challenge to him a battle of wits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is just what he will be expecting!

  16. Develop a backbone. by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Raise hell with him/her and with management about him/her. Be ANGRY. Say you'll walk.

    And then, if you have to, do it.

    I speak from experience in my past. You do NOT want to go down the road of trying to "make it better in a non-confrontational way." Do you know what that makes you? A weakling. A loser. Someone who has to tiptoe around. Someone who spends too much time thinking strategically about how to get from mundane point A to mundane point B without experiencing problems.

    Your productivity will fall. Your self-esteem will collapse. And you will find that you also enable the behavior, and it gets worse, and then worse again.

    You're already a victim, and you're letting yourself stay one. Don't make yourself a target, too.

    I know the whole schtick about "it's not that easy," and finances and economic realities and justice and whatever else. Used to be there, too.

    The fact is, you will regret it in the end. All of the consequences you are hoping to avoid will happen, because you will lose the respect of your co-workers, your bos(ses), and you will lose your own productivity. Long term, you have one choice: confront or not. And not confronting is a SURE loss (again, long term). If you don't confront, WILL be out of a job eventually, you WILL find that you have been made worse for it with respect to your ability to do the next job.

    If you confront and raise hell, you have a CHANCE of coming out of things intact. A chance may seem like a risk you don't want to take. But the other way, losing is a certainty.

    So accept the hard truth that someone has decided to fuck you over, accept the hard truth that unless you metaphorically punch them in the face they WILL continue to do it and will intensify the behavior, and then grow a backbone and take your best shot back. Even if you lose that way, at least you took a shot. You didn't sit there like a weenie (which I did for far too long) and take it, then whine like a little girl, lose your self respect, and then find out that that's what everyone thinks of you and that's why you got let go despite taking shit like a hero. You're nobody's hero if you take shit. Management does not want employees that take shit.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Develop a backbone. by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I should add—you have probably already screwed yourself over.

      The right time to hit fan with shit is the FIRST time an incident happens. Show that you're worth a lot, and you know your worth, and you won't stand for it.

      By waiting until it's a whole narrative and you're posting to Slashdot, when you do go to management about it, they're going to see you as someone that can't solve your own problems and lets them fester in secret and grow, then brings them up the chain when they're too big for you to solve. This is not a desirable characteristic in an employee.

      Live and learn.

      Next job, the first time someone fucks with you, tell them in no uncertain terms, "Unless you somehow get promoted ahead of me, you are NOT my manager and I won't stand for that shit. This is a boundary. I'm drawing it right now. Cross it and it'll be you or me around here."

      Then, immediately tell your manager, "I just had a bad experience with X. They did Y which I found to be unacceptable and not conducive to my work. I set a boundary. It was conflictual. I told them that if they do it again, this will be a significant issue. I'm not leaving this on your plate or anything, but I did want you to be aware that that happened, and that that's what I said."

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    2. Re:Develop a backbone. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I think in essence this boils down to a "fight or flee" response. Either you stand your ground and fight for a better work environment and possibly lose badly or you dodge the problematic employee/employees/boss and find a better work environment somewhere else. And the premise here is that fight is impossible, then you're not left with a whole lot of choices.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more.
      I just recently quit my job because I knew talking with HR or management would have no effect aside from setting everyone on edge and further compounding the issues.

      So now I sit at home looking for work. It's -31C outside. So much for my 5 years without a winter as I travelled the world. 72 countries total.
      Ah well, this is a better life anyhow. You can actually stream Netflix on land. :D

    4. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We have a kind of toxic environment where I work. Very intense competition, managerial structure is pitiful at best. I am myself gaslighted on many occasions -- more verbally than actually through actions, but inaction can sometimes be as damaging as direct action.

      I follow the non-confrontational way. It doesn't work all that well, in fact... at least regarding the consequences for my sanity and self-confidence. It helps that I'm old and have been thru a lot of success stories, so they really can't take that from me.

      A colleague decide to go the confrontational way like suggested by the parent posters. In our culture, that is seen as a sign being weak and childish. Besides being bullied, he ended up being seen as weirdo, short-fused, unpleasant. All in all, reacting only gave the aggressors a lot more satisfaction.

      I haven't got any answer or solution. What I know is that for some people, you must be pushed down so they stay afloat. There's no talk with them, they don't want to form an understanding. The best advice I've seen is to look for good people to foster friendships and build relations -- just for creating a breathable environment or maybe even for mutual interest. The jerks won't do: they would rather lose provided they can see you sinking. Short of a miracle, there's nothing really one can do to bring them to the light.

      It's sad, and if you're a normal person this might look worse from a social and even religious point-of-view -- realistically, though, you'd trying to fix people who want to be bad.

    5. Re:Develop a backbone. by bulled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This, I made the mistake once of letting a Gaslighting jerk slide and I ended up leaving when it became clear that the non-confrontational approach just fed his bullshit. You have to put a stop to it immediately or walk, there is no middle ground.

    6. Re: Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: you live in Finland and used to service huge diesel engines?

    7. Re: Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Better luck next time, Hillary.

    8. Re:Develop a backbone. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Better to tell them you'd like to use them as a reference because you don't want to rock the boat, but you also don't want to work with creepo. This way you're being as reasonable as can be.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re:Develop a backbone. by RuffMasterD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well said. I had a similar issue with my own manager last year. She decided to micro manage, moved the goal posts repeatedly, tried to blackmail me into doing her work, isolated me from colleagues by saying bad things about me, examining and criticising every piece of work I did, and generally being a bully.

      I trained in the army, where pissing contests are the norm, so I have seen this before. I resisted immediately and consistently. This left my manager with two strategies to choose from. Either back off and lose status, or escalate. She chose to escalate. The more she escalated, the more I resisted. It is a risky strategy for her. On the one hand she is betting that I will relent sooner rather than later so she can have her way, and in return she will give me some peace. On the other hand, the more she escalates the more intrusive, abusive, unreasonable, and messy things get for both of us. The messier things get, the more people notice, and not in a "look how well she is managing" kind of way.

      Meanwhile she made a friend at HR and told them all about this terribly unprofessional employee she had. Then I got a letter from HR requesting a meeting to discuss some concerns my manager had about my unprofessional behaviour. This is where documentation comes in handy. Try to get every decision in writing. My manager took great care to say verbally anything that I might use against her. The best I could do at that point is write her an email asking for clarification or confirmation. Then she either confirms it, sealing her fate, or refutes it, letting me off the hook, or she ignores it, implicitly accepting it. In any case, there is now a paper trail. Once she sees her request in writing, she usually tries to weasel out of it, implying I misunderstood and comes back with a much more reasonable request.

      I succeeded to disprove most of my managers accusations by bringing up old emails. That took the wind out of the remaining accusations. Somewhere in this process my managers new friend at HR realised she had been hoodwinked and swap herself with someone impartial. Then things really started to improve. My manager couldn't conceal or undo some things she did while escalating. HR elevated some issues very high up the ranks. When busy important people have to fix underlings fuck-ups, they remember. They will fix things once, but not twice. My manager knows that if I am going to give up my job and get a shitty reference because of her, I will make it as difficult as possible for her and take her down with me. We have a much better understanding now.

      Morel of the story:
      - Get everything in writing. You might need it. In any case, written agreements tend to be self limiting and self enforcing.
      - Resist firmly and consistently. If you waver once, you give them leverage.
      - Things will get much worse before they get better. Find as much support as you can.
      - Keep it clean. Let the other person lose their morel high ground if they choose, but don't follow them.

      Finally, I would say do not give an ultimatum between X or leaving. I have seen people do that, and the response is generally "OK. Leave. Bye". Your company might start preparing for it, leaving yourself little room to negotiate. You can always leave after trying all other avenues, and finding another job first, but don't let them see it coming.

      --
      Human Rights, Article 12: Freedom from Interference with Privacy, Family, Home and Correspondence
    10. Re:Develop a backbone. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      You can get back if you've let it slide a few times. It's just a little bit stressful with loud arguments and the pathetic bully acting as if you have "betrayed" him and going around telling everyone you are "passive agressive". It doesn't go on like that forever even though the pathetic bully is very likely to try a few more things before giving up.
      Also don't be afraid of official channels. The pathetic bullies are not and will sometimes make noise even if you don't. Putting an emphasis on "wasting time" and "childish pranks" is a good way to frame things with official channels. I had one spiteful loser "prank" with "the office phone system is down" in the middle of a server outage that was holding up everyone's work, so once I confirmed the phones were up I rang his supervisor asking him to keep that loser off my back with his inappropriately timed childish antics. While the loser did later confront me redfaced with rage he didn't try any more shit like that again.

    11. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I might know that colleague. Got fired, sued, and is now unemployable.

      The people who are all saying "just leave" are right. Leave. Immediately. Go to fast food if that's how you have to pay bills. Hope you're active on github. You might still have a career.

      It's not fair, but when somebody gets murdered it's not fair either. Somebody is attempting homicide on your career.

    12. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well said. I had a similar issue with my own manager last year. She decided to micro manage, moved the goal posts repeatedly, tried to blackmail me into doing her work, isolated me from colleagues by saying bad things about me, examining and criticising every piece of work I did, and generally being a bully.

      I trained in the army, where pissing contests are the norm, so I have seen this before. I resisted immediately and consistently. This left my manager with two strategies to choose from. Either back off and lose status, or escalate. She chose to escalate. The more she escalated, the more I resisted. It is a risky strategy for her. On the one hand she is betting that I will relent sooner rather than later so she can have her way, and in return she will give me some peace. On the other hand, the more she escalates the more intrusive, abusive, unreasonable, and messy things get for both of us. The messier things get, the more people notice, and not in a "look how well she is managing" kind of way.

      Meanwhile she made a friend at HR and told them all about this terribly unprofessional employee she had. Then I got a letter from HR requesting a meeting to discuss some concerns my manager had about my unprofessional behaviour. This is where documentation comes in handy. Try to get every decision in writing. My manager took great care to say verbally anything that I might use against her. The best I could do at that point is write her an email asking for clarification or confirmation. Then she either confirms it, sealing her fate, or refutes it, letting me off the hook, or she ignores it, implicitly accepting it. In any case, there is now a paper trail. Once she sees her request in writing, she usually tries to weasel out of it, implying I misunderstood and comes back with a much more reasonable request.

      I succeeded to disprove most of my managers accusations by bringing up old emails. That took the wind out of the remaining accusations. Somewhere in this process my managers new friend at HR realised she had been hoodwinked and swap herself with someone impartial. Then things really started to improve. My manager couldn't conceal or undo some things she did while escalating. HR elevated some issues very high up the ranks. When busy important people have to fix underlings fuck-ups, they remember. They will fix things once, but not twice. My manager knows that if I am going to give up my job and get a shitty reference because of her, I will make it as difficult as possible for her and take her down with me. We have a much better understanding now.

      Morel of the story:

      - Get everything in writing. You might need it. In any case, written agreements tend to be self limiting and self enforcing.

      - Resist firmly and consistently. If you waver once, you give them leverage.

      - Things will get much worse before they get better. Find as much support as you can.

      - Keep it clean. Let the other person lose their morel high ground if they choose, but don't follow them.

      Finally, I would say do not give an ultimatum between X or leaving. I have seen people do that, and the response is generally "OK. Leave. Bye". Your company might start preparing for it, leaving yourself little room to negotiate. You can always leave after trying all other avenues, and finding another job first, but don't let them see it coming.

      Also, while true, if you find they are making preparations for you to leave or be fired, calling in your notice and leaving usually shows them that they made the bed they are now laying in. IN my case, I did my due diligence and trained my replacement from outside the office and he still couldn't do the job, nor could the person they replaced him with or the person after that.. and I made an offer to come back and let bygones be bygones but they didn't call me back.. funny though that the people that caused the problem, all the way up to the vice president of the company was let go not a month after that. I still have over 100 good references in that company and everyone knows that I was treated badly by a few bad actors who are all looking for work now. I don't make quitting threats, nor do I take firing threats lightly as a result.

      Funniest Captcha of the day right here: Crotch!

    13. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I left a company due to one of these jerks. Luckily I got a promotion out of the move. Right time-right place sort of thing.
      Two years later my new company took over the old one. The 'gaslighter' was still there doing his old tricks.

      Along with the HR director, we took each person in my old department to one side and discussed how we could best integrate the two departments.
      Without fail, they said, get rid of 'him', i.e. the Gaslighter.

      The HR director was a bit perplexed.
      "But you used to work there."
      "Yes and I left because of him. Here is my record of what he did to me. He hasn't changed in two years."
      The HR Director read my document.
      Then he says,
      "I'll let you give him the bad news then?"
      I called in the gaslighter.
      His face lit up in a huge smile when he saw me.
      "Ready for some more?"
      "No. As you would be working for me, and I don't want that, you are out of here. Security will escort you from the building now"

      Last I heard he was washing cars.

    14. Re:Develop a backbone. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      You do not understand the effects of gaslighting. The person subjected to it gets its "backbone" removed over time. To insist someone have to grow a backbone is a very ignorant position. Understandable, but ignorant. The two options are (a) get out of there and rebuild your ego outside. It might help to seek professional help. (b) log everything, try to build alliances and then present your case through official channels or directly to higher management. Unfortunately, this may also result in your dismissal. The second option is only worth it if the company is somewhat emotionally relevant to you.

      It is also possible to seek professional help and try to improve your position with that help, before you quit or fight. In case you live in Europe you could also go to works council, as you do not trust the management. That is where to go.

    15. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, be wary that sometimes people will play cards you might not have seen. Don't fall for the "I believed in you" white knight managers - I've seen them go from that belief to "I had a chat with you colleagues and they say you're not...". A lot of the time they're using divide and conquer tactics to apply pressure to the team to get more done. Just talking to a few people frankly can be quite revealing.

      If anyone in an organization is having conversations about you that don't involve you and don't have you present then tell them in no uncertain terms: "You will discuss my business and my performance with me present - THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS". I've been placed on negotiated performance reviews that completely lacked any negotiation, or even acknowledgement that I was part of the process. Sometimes performance reviews are an iron fist to get you to work harder and sacrifice your family, your sanity and you future for the purpose of your manager getting a cushy bonus and/or promotion. Sometimes what the manager says is gospel. If you're working there then I advise you either ditch your family or find somewhere better to work. Go with the latter is a good choice.

      Ultimately I got into this business to do good by having good standards and a good approach to delivery. If everyone around you wants to shovel shit out of the door then you can't help them. Get out. Move on.

    16. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think in essence this boils down to a "fight or flee" response.

      This is what hurts the worse. The whole situation is terrible, and the victim is set to suffer humiliation, lack of cooperation, loss of status in the company, possibly depression etc.

      But the worse is the notion that the other guy lacks good manners, consideration, good will and all the good things that separates us from animals. For him/her it's a zero-sum game. If things were on a saner level, about an hour of talking would lead to an improvement for all, including for the employer. But in his/her pettiness, he won't admit that things can work out somehow. Even if you could beat him at his game, it would be an empty victory, because you're not a gaslighter, there's not much pleasure in vengeance -- you just regret the fact that the guy was not very brilliant for starters.

      Maybe going away, and making a showy case about why you're living could be the best answer in this case. Maybe the employer gets fed up with gaslighter and send him packing, because nobody wants a troublemaker after all. Maybe after losing some 2 or 3 jobs, the gaslighter would understand that either it's a win-win game or an "everybody loses" one.

    17. Re:Develop a backbone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking the approach of colleague != boss is working quite well, unless his boss is more or less bullied the same way, has got an exploitable weakness or is just not able to make it work.
      Often enough there are people at the workplace that show a predatory behavior to be/feel "successful" and their bosses are usually of the same mindset. I came across this several times, from libel, lies, to injury and gaslighting, everything in between. It is still ongoing and i dont really care about it. Its simply psychopaths/machiavellists that feel threatened and think escalation, threatening or building up pressure helps them with that.
      You could try to find the weak spot in their system (there are usually plenty) and kick as hard as possible, keeping things constructive works as well. Just dont try to be drawn into their game, as the first thing such systems try is to make newcomers guilty or into the same mindset when using their methods to have a base to work on. However, it takes you more resources than it takes them if you want to do something about it in a legal way, if you are able to spend those resources, you should do it.

      Bottom line: someone who needs to manipulate to do his job usually lacks the ability and intelligence to convince others of more realistic approaches to get along in the workplace (which is possible, just does not work in their favor). In the long run it takes them more resources to keep their system of lying, cheating and stealing up instead of being sufficiently honest. It cracks them up, especially if they are phony about their abilities or suddenly held responsible for their statements.

      There is usually nothing wrong with you, because you are not in control of what and to what extent someone does to you while personal freedoms are abused, which methods someone uses and how you react to it. You are responsible for your reaction, to a certain amount. Keeping copies and communicating openly helps of course, as most machiavellists will try to stay hidden. Transparency is key to cope with such methods, on the other hand you should accept that you are manipulatable and should be careful about anything regarding you and your response. Helping others in a similar situation is therefore important as you can provide them some oversight or come at the right time to nullify a plethora of smoke-and-mirror attempts from your very own personal experience.

  17. Easy - Play to there Ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always say you are looking to learn from their knowledge. Call them a superstar. To their boss, compliment them on how they are making you better.

    I had a lead like this and while I was a better coder, he did teach me some valuable stuff. You can always learn from anyone - even if it is what not to do.

    Now if you are being bullied, as in threatened, then you need to look for another job. Otherwise, first challenge yourself to learn how to best work with a person like this.

  18. Quit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Unless you're willing to break a few laws and are not generally against the idea of an asshole getting physically harmed.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Granades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than One

  20. It's kinda obvious ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 0

    ... you're not in IT.

    I have seriously fucked over some majorly big people in my career who came, in a subtle way, to discover a direct correlation between their computing experience and their treatment of me.

    Nice people had a lot less trouble than the assholes did.

    See BOFH.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:It's kinda obvious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've worked in software sales for years. I've dealt with IT folks like you now and then. I'm going to let you guys in on a few secrets.

      Most of my colleagues and managers have dealt with your type before, too. We know that your kind suffer from a lack of power in and over your lives. We know that your type is often physically unhealthy, weak, and overweight. We know that your type often doesn't have any sort of meaningful relationships or family. We kind of feel sorry for you sorts. So we do understand why such people lash out. Your kind feels helpless, and so you try to act aggressively to overcome this weakness.

      So when your kind deny our simple and polite IT-related requests, we just let our managers know. They'll roll their eyes, being all too familiar with your kind's pointless shenanigans. Then we'll quickly figure out some way to work around your kind's nonsense. After all, we've got real business to do.

      Suppose your kind won't fix the email server problems. We'll just make a call to the customer instead. We'll use our cell phones, since the office phones are all buggered and your department hasn't gotten around to fixing them. Sometimes we'll just contract out the work. Regardless, we get our work done without your sorts.

      The entire management hierarchy is aware of your kind's petty games. They keep your types around because while they do feel sorry for you, they do also find your kind amusing. Your kind are basically like jesters of the corporate world, except without the insight and intelligence of real jesters.

      When your kind think that you've "seriously fucked over some majorly big people", what's typically happened is that they've been promoted because they succeeded in spite of whatever childish games your kind were playing. The people your kind has "fucked over" who are no longer in the office? They didn't get fired. They got promoted to the regional headquarters, if not the main headquarters, with a nice salary boost to boot. Some actually choose to retire early. After all, we're making big commissions on all of our sales, while you're clicking your mouse and acting all tough for peanuts.

      Simply put, your kind is a joke to the rest of us in the office. Your type is an amusement, at best. At worst, your kind are a mild annoyance that we swiftly work around. To be honest, we've typically forgotten about your kind a minute or so after any interaction with your kind ends. When we do come to your kind, sometimes we're just bored while waiting for the legal team to finish writing up some sales contracts, and we're looking for some brief amusement. If there's one thing your kind should feel proud of, it's that your kind often give the rest of us something to laugh at!

    2. Re:It's kinda obvious ... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      No correlation to this story and management deciding that they'll get better support from a bunch of $15/hr h1bs. But hey, you stuck it to the man.

    3. Re:It's kinda obvious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In engineering, this is how "shadow IT" grows.
      Do I want to maintains my own DNS server? HELL NO! But if the official IT ones don't work, I sure can! It's a horrible idea for a lot of reasons (and long-term will cause IT A LOT of pain), but as a colleague said: "We are engineers, we solve problems".
      One thing is sure: the company doesn't come out ahead in these kind of things.

    4. Re:It's kinda obvious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we'll quickly figure out some way to work around your kind's nonsense. After all, we've got real business to do.

      Suppose your kind won't fix the email server problems. ... Sometimes we'll just contract out the work.

      Let me guess: Problems are defined as "IT was required to upgrade the email server to use TLS 1.2, but user doesn't want to upgrade their client because the new version of the client loses an emoji that their child's teacher regularly uses in classroom updates." and fixes are defined as dropping back to SSL 2.
      Enjoy your fines after the audits.

      "Wahh! Why is my laptop encrypted? It's too slow to compile anything now!" *fix* *fix* (loading their own OS) "Yay! Now I'm non-compliant, have Chinese and Russian malware stealing company code, but at least I can compile with 200 more MHz and slighty faster I/O!"
      Enjoy your fines after the audits. And also enjoy your competitors undercutting you with your own code. Good luck proving it.

      "We want to run our own public facing Apache webserver on this Windows XP laptop because going through the web team, communications team, and legal department for any changes takes too long."
      Enjoy your company going down the tubes when your website disappears for a week because no backups and it was hacked or just HDD failure.

      We're busy keeping your ass out of the fire that you keep trying to put it in, and when we stop, you mock us for your own stupidity. We treat you condescendingly because you feel like our pre-teen children.

    5. Re: It's kinda obvious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol.... Your comment proves everything the GP said!

    6. Re:It's kinda obvious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your delusional ideas going...sales people are dime a dozen, and can and will be replaced any time. They actually do not know shit, and often their unreasonable requests show it. As I have said for long, worse than someone who does not know anything, is people that think that they know something. They also have an habit of passing their work and letting their underlings passing their work to IT people when they need actual technical data they should have known many noons ago, but then they are the ones getting the deal. As often I said to my commercial manager: "If your sales people are lazy enough to ask my people to write their sales proposals, then I want my people to get the commissions." Oddly enough, that solved the problem. IT also has people of all sizes and type of relationships with the family, you just proved you are a douchebag. meh

  21. If you always seem to have bad roommates... by sunking2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe you're the bad roommate. Be a better employee perhaps.

    1. Re:If you always seem to have bad roommates... by mjr167 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This. We had an employee we had to hand hold and scrutinize everything. One team even went so far to create a special branch just for them. They were convinced they were perfect and everyone else was racist/sexist/egotistical/out to get them. They were absolutely convinced they walked on water and the problem with everyone else.

      Truth was, their work sucked. They didn't listen to instructions. They didn't do what they were told to do and instead always did something "better".

    2. Re:If you always seem to have bad roommates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. The whole story sounds like he's a millennial with a persecution complex. "Gaslighting"? This is hardly gaslighting. Did Clinton teach you that word, pumpkin? Do you need a safe space? Man up, nancy. Your work product needs some help. Stop blaming others for the manner in which they criticize it. The days of everyone getting a participation award are over, buttercup.

    3. Re:If you always seem to have bad roommates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a fellow employee who WAS the gaslighter. Everyone else 'sucked'. He made sure to let everyone else know. I was the first victim. We went from rotating tech leads to only him being the one who can decide the variable names in 3 hour meetings. All code checkins had to go through him.

      He then spent the next 2 years rewriting all of the code. Killed the project dead. He had no idea why. I would tell him. He would ignore me and the 3 previous tech leads on the project.

      Now *I* get to deal with depression and second guessing everything I do. Don't even work with the guy anymore. Went from one of the top guys to one of the bottom because of what he did to me.

    4. Re: If you always seem to have bad roommates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comrade Putin, your disguise is slipping!

    5. Re:If you always seem to have bad roommates... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      If you know it was the other guy and not you, why are you dealing with depression and second guessing yourself still? Seems to me that you would or should have moved on and recovered or something by now.

      I've had jobs where I had to deal with asshats. I was unhappy and probably depressed under a clinical definition. But all that changed when I changed jobs and didn't deal with assclowns. I actually enjoyed my job and was happy until they hired new bean counters and started scrutinizing everything which I left for yet another job.. I even had one job that turned around and was great after the asshat wrecked his car and took 4 months off to recover from life threatening injuries.

      If you are letting someone who has no contact with you continue to influence your life or mental state, perhaps you need professional help or something. I just don't understand how it is possible.

    6. Re:If you always seem to have bad roommates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not the same AC, but I've watched what gaslighting can do to people. The whole point of "gaslighting" in the proper sense is to mess with people's head. When done proficiently, they end up second guessing themsevles. For example, established employees occasionally steeling and destroying files from a drawer or taking a page from the desk, and doing so unknowingly to the victim. They keep telling the victim that they lost the files because of them being disorganized, and the victim has nothing but suspicions to go on that it is not themselves. I've also seen companies where an established employee will call a client that is supposed to be responsibility of the new guy, tell them stuff about the new guy like, "He isn't actually a sales guy, but is trying to pretend to be one to get promoted, please do not communicate with him and call me if you need anything." The client doesn't retell this to anyone, just suddenly refuses to talk to the new guy, and the new guy (and management) start assuming they did something wrong to offend the client.

      By the end of this, even when you conclusively found that it was someone else's fault, you've been down trodden, taught to second guess your own performance, and can have lasting effects that don't simply go away once you've figured things out. Skillful efforts can destroy a person's confidence in themselves, and at some of these companies there are employees with a decade or more experience at doing just that. It seems like a miracle that such companies can continue to exist (some only do so by making illegal short cuts...), yet they do despite having extreme work culture and ethic issues.

    7. Re:If you always seem to have bad roommates... by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Or maybe most people are shit, or you're stuck in a context where most people are shit and you can't escape it to one where people are generally better...

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  22. Snap traps by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0

    At one place I had a sword in a holder at my office, and my office mate used to take it out and swing it around during long compiles when I wasn't in the office.

    So I put a couple of snap traps under the sword and waited. Those things are really loud when they go off.

    A day or two later the sysadmin came into my office to do a system upgrade or something, and while it was installing he spun around in the chair and grabbed the sword off the holder, and both traps went off and the entire office heard it. Made quite a ruckus!

    You could put a couple of those under a file on your desk, or inside a desk drawer or something. When they go off, you then ask him why he was going into your drawer in the first place, and afterwards he'll stop because he'll never know what you might have booby-trapped.

  23. Depends on what you mean by "gaslighting" by Scareduck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem with "gaslighting", as I wrote here, is that it tends to be used in two contexts, one legitimate (people lying about factual events) and one illegitimate (people disagreeing on interpretations of those events). Based on what I'm reading here, it looks like some of both: the unscheduling in particular seems like a red flag, but a lot of the other stuff is contextual and missing details. Furthermore, the fact that the author complains about coworkers' criticisms — and in particular, the criticism of someone they label as a "superstar" within the company, i.e. a person who has developed a sterling reputation — leads me to question the submitter's competence. So, I would advise,

    • If you know from prior work experience that you are competent and the work environment is toxic, leave, knowing you can find a better employment situation elsewhere.
    • But also be open to the idea that you may have your own "crisis of competence" here.
    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Depends on what you mean by "gaslighting" by nyet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. It is entirely possible the whiner is an incompetent fool who can't take criticism and refuses to believe they're terrible at their job.

    2. Re:Depends on what you mean by "gaslighting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. An another indication of their incompetence is asking Slashdot to join into a conspiracy to take down somebody who has their number.

    3. Re:Depends on what you mean by "gaslighting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that the claims are more than criticisms, but unscheduling events, etc. To doubt the poster's veracity on one point is to doubt their handle on reality itself, as they would need to be simply lying or delusional about the crossing of lines.

      Also, it's an anonymous person posting the question. What harm is it to give the benefit of the doubt and answer the question as is? If the person is truly deserving all of the received criticism, then leaving the company would be beneficial to the company and others who really are in the claimed situation might still benefit from actual answers than "Maybe you're just whining for no reason".

    4. Re:Depends on what you mean by "gaslighting" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my instinct in reading the OP... and that it's difficult to be sure of how much of each without knowing a lot more.

      Also I think some people take criticism in the wrong way, and perhaps also give it in the wrong way. I tend to criticise ideas and code as a way of deconstructing and analysing it (abstractly) I don't want to overly criticise individuals when it's mostly unwarranted but am aware that it can come off that way.

    5. Re:Depends on what you mean by "gaslighting" by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I came in here to comment because I'm not sure this is gaslighting. It seems the behavior would be better described as "scrutinizing" or "micromanaging", or perhaps just "fucking with".

      For example, cancelling someone else's appointment at the last minute is not "gaslighting". If you somehow hacked into someone's email account and occasionally deleted reminders from their calendar, specifically so that they would miss appointments and think they'd forgotten to put it on their calendar, *that* would be gaslighting. Telling a coworker that their code sucks is not gaslighting. Covertly adding typos to their working code, without leaving any record of the edit, so that it mysterious stops working and the author believes they just had a bunch of typos-- that would be gaslighting.

      Gaslighting is all about messing with someone in such a way that they don't know you're doing it, and instead feel like they're the one who is making mistakes, forgetting things, misplacing things, etc. The intention is to make them doubt their own abilities and sanity. What was described in the summary doesn't sound like gaslighting.

  24. Several options by davidwr · · Score: 1

    A/C's out-of-the-box reply above, Easy - Play to there Ego [sic] , may work but assuming it doesn't, you have few options.

    The obvious ones include:
    * Quit quietly
    * Document the hell out of everything then quit, and provide the reasons in a professionally-written resignation letter to not only this person's boss, but his boss's boss. Provide copies of the documentation.
    * Assuming you want to keep your job or at least come away vindicated, hire an employment lawyer and follow his advice. Warning: Only do this if you are prepared for a years-long, unpleasant, expensive battle.
    * Seek other opportunities within the organization.

    I'm taking it on faith that talking to this person or to management really won't work. I'm also assuming that there is no intermediary that the fellow employee respects who can intervene on your behalf. If I'm wrong, if there is such a person, consider asking him to help.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Several options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A/C's out-of-the-box reply above, Easy - Play to there Ego [sic] , may work but assuming it doesn't, you have few options.

      The obvious ones include:
      * Quit quietly
      * Document the hell out of everything then quit, and provide the reasons in a professionally-written resignation letter to not only this person's boss, but his boss's boss. Provide copies of the documentation.
      * Assuming you want to keep your job or at least come away vindicated, hire an employment lawyer and follow his advice. Warning: Only do this if you are prepared for a years-long, unpleasant, expensive battle.
      * Seek other opportunities within the organization.

      I'm taking it on faith that talking to this person or to management really won't work. I'm also assuming that there is no intermediary that the fellow employee respects who can intervene on your behalf. If I'm wrong, if there is such a person, consider asking him to help.

      Nothing shuts up a former employer giving an unfair bad reference than a signed cease and desist letter from an employment lawyer sent to them, their boss, their bosses boss and all the way up the chain to the CEO. I have done this and they give me good references now. Problem solved and I make more money than the bosses boss now.

    2. Re:Several options by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If management were doing their job, they would have already been aware of the problem and be working to fix it. So if there is a problem, whether it's all in the posters' head or it's someone else, management is incompetent. LEAVE.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:Several options by davidwr · · Score: 1

      Nothing shuts up a former employer giving an unfair bad reference than a signed cease and desist letter from an employment lawyer sent to them, their boss, their bosses boss and all the way up the chain to the CEO. I have done this and they give me good references now.

      Thanks to the threat of lawsuits - real or imagined - some employers no longer give "good" or "bad" references - at least not officially. They only give dates of employment, final salary, and eligibility for rehire.

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    4. Re:Several options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing shuts up a former employer giving an unfair bad reference than a signed cease and desist letter from an employment lawyer sent to them, their boss, their bosses boss and all the way up the chain to the CEO. I have done this and they give me good references now.

      Thanks to the threat of lawsuits - real or imagined - some employers no longer give "good" or "bad" references - at least not officially. They only give dates of employment, final salary, and eligibility for rehire.

      Having worked for a telephone voice recorder provider, I would beg to differ, You would be appalled at what is often said "Off the record".

  25. Check whether the organization protects you by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    and if not, leave. The check is to first talk to your manager and if that fails to take it if with HR. If that still fails, hand in your notice as soon as you economically can. That may mean staying on a few more months, or may mean leaving immediately. It is neither your expertise nor your responsibility to solve that kind of problem. It is your responsibility to escalate it though, as it harms the organization.

    Do not get your hopes up too much for the organization to be able to resolve this, unless you are essential and the piece-of-shit doing this is not, it is pretty likely that they will not resolve the issue and you will have to leave.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  26. Document everything with Dates. by Wild_dog! · · Score: 2

    It is amazing how powerful a dispassionate set of written text documenting every detail over a series of months can be.
    Then you take the document to your to superiors and explain that because of this harassment you feel the work place is hostile and resign.

    1. Re:Document everything with Dates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amazing how powerful a dispassionate set of written text documenting every detail over a series of months can be.
      Then you take the document to your to superiors and explain that because of this harassment you feel the work place is hostile and resign.

      The first time this happens complain to management about it. Document everything. If management blows you off, then resign ... and then sue the crap out of them for creating a hostile work environment and refusing to do anything about it. Of course this only works if other employees know what is going on, if no one will testify it's just your documentation against his friends testimony.

      DISCLAIMER: I have never been in this situation.

  27. Easy! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Plant ISIS literature on his PC and then call the feds.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even easier option: Plant Pro-Trump literature on his PC and on his desk, and then some black people will kidnap and torture him over a period of 48 hours.

      It would be the perfect revenge.

    2. Re:Easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you work at my company, instead of that try planting weird files about cheese pizza in his documents.

      Know your audience. :)

  28. I had a micromanaging boss at HP once. by mark_reh · · Score: 5, Funny

    We'd have department meetings and no matter what anyone else came up with, his idea was somehow always better. After a while we all just clammed up in the meetings, let him have his say, then we had our own, informal dept meetings without him over lunch. We eventually decided that the best way to get rid of him was to make him look good so he'd get promoted away. It took about 6 months but we made it happen. His boss saw what was going on and asked me about it and I told him the whole thing. My immediate boss ended up getting "promoted" to a position as an "individual contributor".

    When they go low, you go high...

  29. Or cameras by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    Or cameras...then post it on Facebooge

    --
    I come here for the love
  30. Just one option... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Quit. If you cite bullying harassment that management was unwilling to deal with as a reason for quitting when applying for EI, then the company will be investigated, and will probably at least ensure that the asshole who put you in this position doesn't do the same to anyone else. You may even be able to sue them for constructive dismissal.

    1. Re:Just one option... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      then the company will be investigated

      what agency are you under the mistaken belief investigates bullying in the workplace?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Just one option... by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      Why is the answer always "sue"?

      If there's a toxic (but not illegal) problem in the workplace, and you're a halfway decent coder, you generally hold the power. You'll be able to find another job--there's massive opportunities in the market. Unless there's a significant reason you need THIS job, get the issue fixed or go somewhere you won't be miserable.

      To address the issue, be an adult. Document a few of your concerns, and politely tell your manager. If necessary, escalate. If that doesn't work, find a new job. If they fire you for raising your concerns... get that new job. Why would you want to work there anyway!?

      Don't worry about "justice". Why in the world would you want to hire a lawyer, go through years of hell for 50% of some relatively small payout, and make a name for yourself that might make future employment harder? Is that lawsuit really the legacy you want to leave? If the environment is that toxic, they're going to have trouble retaining people, and that will make business very hard for them. It's called Karma.

      I think the Amish have it right. Luke 6:29-30.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    3. Re:Just one option... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It's less about being bullied than it is about having to pay EI because of it. It's called constructive dismissal and is illegal in most jurisdictions.

    4. Re:Just one option... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Why is the answer always "sue"?

      Not always... but when one's civic rights are violated, most certainly.

      If there's a toxic (but not illegal) problem in the workplace...

      Actually, that toxic problem becomes illegal when somebody has to apply for employment insurance because of it.... particularly in jurisdictions where EI does not normally pay out when a person voluntarily quits the job.

      Don't worry about "justice". Why in the world would you want to hire a lawyer, go through years of hell for 50% of some relatively small payout...

      IANAL, but I have known several people to have dealt with constructive dismissal lawsuits in the past, and it seems like they are usually open-and-shut... often settling out of court. While the payout may not be a life-changing experience like winning a lottery may be, it can still amount to several months' pay, and the extra funds can certainly come in handy while one is looking for new job. If one finds a new job quickly enough, they are that far ahead of the game.

    5. Re:Just one option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not illegal. It just means that you'll get unemployment if you can prove your case to a judge acting as an unemployment magistrate in an adversarial hearing with the company. There are no consequences for the company.

    6. Re:Just one option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      off-topic (or not) when you answered 'sue' to the question 'bully' I thought you were going to go Johnny cash on him

    7. Re:Just one option... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it's not illegal in any state. the quitting employee MAY qualify for unemployment benefits, but that doesn't make it illegal.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  31. Have sex with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be surprised how high you can climb with a couple BJs.

  32. God are you people serious? by redmid17 · · Score: 1

    If it's that fucking bad, just leave. Don't threaten to leave. Get a new job. It's not worth the time or effort to fix. Gaslighters are never going to get better and if this situation exists (for whatever reason), it's being tacitly allowed by those upstairs.

    There's really no other option. I don't relish confrontation but don't shy away from it. However this is not a fight you can win and you look like a moron for trying. Being a passive bitch about it with all the CYA emails and documentation isn't going to help either. It's a huge time sucker and management almost certainly won't care. Grab whatever of your confidence is left, get your resume polished and be prepared to just walk out after giving two weeks notice.

    1. Re:God are you people serious? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      it's being tacitly allowed by those upstairs.

      Many of these bullies are cowards who bow and scrape to those upstairs, so management will not be aware until the incidents pile up. Some years back I had one piece of shit talk to me like I was muck when he met me in the the workshop when I was wearing a stained lab coat, and then later it was funny looking at his face go pale when I went into a meeting with all the other department managers including his boss. He had his "yes boss" voice and his "lick my boots serf" voice. The others hadn't noticed. They didn't approve, they didn't even know despite him making one of the receptionists cry (I didn't know that until later either).

  33. Leave and let die by Doub · · Score: 2

    Either he's really as bad as you say, and the management is oblivious, and the company is doomed. You're better out.

    Or, as shown by the fact that you consider staying in such a bad environment, you know you can't find a better job, because you're shit yourself, and the company would really be better off without you.

    In any case, you have to go.

  34. Ask for a raise. by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just go and ask for a raise. If they don't give it to you, leave. If they do give it to you, you will be considered more important than that sociopathic asshole and you will be able to tell them that that guy is a jerk and you want him fired or moved out of your department/team.

  35. Asking for a friend, by chance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are things not going well at work?

  36. Rest of words imply group by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The rest of the sentence is "bullies unscheduling things you've scheduled, misplacing files and other items that you are working on and co-workers micro-managing you"

    So "co-workers" there would imply more than one person...

    One thing I've not seen addressed by others though; given how poorly this is written, is there not perhaps a good reason this person is micromanaged? The other passive aggressive stuff (like moving files) seems wrong, but possibly the unscheduling comes about from this person calling too many, or pointless meetings. I just have feeling this person may not be in the right the way he thinks he is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Rest of words imply group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I also think he might not be in the right. When I was younger I thought like OP sometimes. It was only when I got older that I realized *I* was the peoblem.

      Not to say that gaslighting isn't a serious issue, but it's easy to sometimes mistakenly think you're being gaslighted.

    2. Re: Rest of words imply group by nyet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly this.

      Which is more likely: the rock star engineer with a proven track record who is well regarded is incompetent, or the new person complaining is incompetent?

    3. Re: Rest of words imply group by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      In this case, "likely" is an inexact approach. Either he/she is or is not. I've had engineers that worked for me that were truly not in the current reality, or they might have been trained on Mars, but certainly no school I can think of. They were absolutely sure of themselves to the point of being able to consider another viewpoint; strident; rigid in the extreme.

      And I've seen the gaslighters do their evil, as well, beating down good people psychologically until they'd done their narcissist's dead.

      But be sure.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re: Rest of words imply group by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oddly the best way to find out is also a great way to get management attention.

      Find a competent experienced manager you can trust, and ask, "I'm finding this situation a problem, but can't work out how to change my approach to address it. Could you make some suggestions that will help me be more effective"

      Managers love that sort of shit, and a good manager will rapidly assess where the problem actually lies.

    5. Re: Rest of words imply group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. The only time I've met someone who thought she was being "gaslit," the employee turned out to be batshit crazy. She eventually threatened to harm management, and the police had to be called. Nobody was ever "gaslighting" her - she was a toxic, horrible person who ruined life for, to some degree or other, everyone at the company for the several years that she managed to hang on to her job there. Whenever she didn't get her way, she said that others were conspiring against her; she imagined that one of her colleagues was in love with her, when he barely knew she existed, and she blamed everyone else for keeping them apart. She claimed the other men (but not her man) were sexually harassing clients, and when management could find no evidence of this, she blamed them for covering up a rape culture in the company and for making her think that she was imagining things, when in fact she was imagining them. I left shortly after she did, because she'd sucked the life out of the company and made it a place without any joy, and I didn't see the company recovering quickly enough to be a decent place to work anytime soon.

      Since then, I don't trust people who claim that they are being "gaslit." Some people are so self-centered that they think they can never be wrong, and they have to blame others whenever they themselves are shown to be wrong. When the rockstar engineer with many years of successful employment is accused by the new guy or girl of "gaslighting," I immediately suspect that the newbie has been fucking up right and left. When the newbie then says that there is no remedy for the situation - that he or she cannot address the problem directly and cannot use the chain of command to address the problem, that just confirms that there is something wrong with the newbie. A normal employee would ask the rockstar what's up with X, Y and Z, and then work out with the rockstar the best way to cooperate to achieve long-term success as a team. A passive-aggressive employee could at least go to HR/management (at some higher level) and get intervention to settle the dispute. The newbie who, instead, goes to Slashdot and asks how to deal with a "gaslighting" rockstar engineer because there is no recourse -- that's someone without whom the company will be better off.

    6. Re: Rest of words imply group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhh blame the victim. A famous strategy at slashdot.

    7. Re: Rest of words imply group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the "victim" is culpable and is in fact the one creating a toxic work environment, yeah, the "victim" needs to be blamed and fired. That's the problem with "gaslighting": it's a paranoia that arises from the "victim" assuming that he or she is infallible and therefore the "victim" of someone else's machinations, when in fact the "victim" is the problem.

    8. Re: Rest of words imply group by phorm · · Score: 1

      On the flip, some people are *very* good at riding on the shoulders of others.

  37. Out them.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had someone do this to me while working in Wall Street.

    Told me to do all sorts of things in private then days later in the team review started complaining and calling the idea dumb. Said he told me to do a different thing and bla bla you know the rest.

    Started off little and got bigger until I started literally hating the job itself. He was all buddy-buddy with the boss too so all that could be done was to leave for another team. To drive the point home I worked even harder at impressing the new team and got my name out there. Shows that I wasn't just an idiot or difficult to work with.

    After that I left the company and just decided to start outing these people. The guy that gave me grief was Rich Kershaw. Basically a talented C/C++ coder who couldn't handle meeting anyone else with talent. Only works well with those below his skill level. I encourage others to do the same and out these people.

  38. Start sucking up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unprovoced petty behavior like that always stems from envy. Flatter and compliment his work, make it clear that you admire his work and the way he does it, and the cancer that he is may start to become a bit more benign, or even friendly towards you.

    1. Re:Start sucking up by Joska · · Score: 1

      This actually worked for me back in my early twenties, although I would say that envy is a form of insecurity and fear of a potential adversary is what triggers the sabotaging behavior. My company had hired a superstar consultant who for some reason instantly regarded me as a threat and said dreadful things to me at every opportunity when others were not within earshot. Since his behavior was based on completely erroneous assumptions about me and in fact I liked the guy, I simply greeted him like a friend, ignored those comments with a momentary confused look and carried on being friendly. I began asking him for advice, which is an admission of vulnerability and a clear acknowledgment of his superior knowledge and experience, all true at the time. After an interval of bewilderment on his part, he realized that I was never hostile to him and in fact looked up to him. He became my biggest ally and gave me endless much needed advice about office and corporate politics. I still use that knowledge decades later, so it was a completely successful strategy. It was easy to implement because it was based on honesty so I wasn't acting a part. People pick up on insincerity unless one is a very fine actor but then the OP has little to lose at this point and kindness is unlikely to backfire.

  39. Tiered response by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    first offense - bark. second offense - growl. third and subsequent offenses - bite. if you do not wish to use violence or do not wish to taste this person's flesh, insist on doing everything in writing / by email+text+IM and relentlessly call out on reality-editing once there's a paper trail.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  40. Take the hint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, I hate the term gaslighting. But whatever...

    Now, are you a crappy employee (you might not know)? If so, it's perfectly reasonable for the company to make your life hell until you quit or they would have to pay unemployment to you if they fired you.

    Or are you a really good employee and some douchebag is threatened by your performance. If so, get over it snowflake. Welcome to the real world. /Self employed //Boss is douchenag but he leaves me alone

  41. bully back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In untraceable ways.
    Hide their coffee cup.
    Open their keyboard and cut some of the traces.
    shorten one of the legs on their desk.
    superglue a wheel on their chair so it doesn't turn
    buy a burner phone and send him loving text messages.
    Pay a hooker to call his wife and ask for him.
    remove the balls from his ballpoints
    Jesus I could go on all day.

    1. Re:bully back by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Admiral Rickover liked to shorten the two front legs of chairs about a half inch. Subtle change in posture makes people nervous.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  42. Video/audio recordings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure if legal in your area, but you could set up a camera to watch your desk/things to see if anyone messes with it.

    You could take the recordings to management, but that may not work.

    You could try to humiliate him using them.

    Or save them for a possible future lawsuit.

  43. Hipster Youth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like a whiny hipster. The type of whiny hipster that managed to get just enough of a skillset to get a job at a decent company but probably feels unappreciated for the "culture" you brought... or some other irrelevant bullshit. Let me guess, rainbow hair? manatee level fat woman or anorexic manlet? ask people their pronouns before addressing them?

    The mere fact your whining about this online (and ./ of all places) makes me never ever want to work with you let alone meet you.

  44. One other thing— by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    If you have the leverage to do it (seniority, centrality to key projects, etc.) you might be able to parlay the conflict.

    "I've had several conflictual interactions with so-and-so recently and I'm worried that there is a power struggle emerging about key decisions. I'd like to nip this in the bud so that we can all get on with our work. To me, this speaks to ambiguous responsibilities and hierarchy, and I wonder if this is going to grow as an issue. For this reason and on the strength of my importance to what we're going, I think it would help to promote me so that the difference in seniority is clear, decisions have a single point of signoff, and someone is clearly accountable—i.e. me, since I take that responsibility seriously already. Think it over, but based on what's been going on, I think it would be best for the project/department/company if my title was increased to ___ and my current responsibility set were reiterated formally to the group, to stop this kind of confusion from turning into an issue that slows us down."

    That only works if you are in a position with the rest of your co-workers and your management to make the claim, which—based on your question—I'm guessing your'e not. But if you are, do it and take the promotion, then you get to tell this person where to go and what to do going forward.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  45. If he's at the same level as you by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    just ask him to do some work every time he comes near you. Be polite about it and say you really could use some help and make it sound like he's the only one who can do it. Butter him up too. Tell him how great he is.

    He'll get start steering clear of you to avoid the extra work. Such people are always incompetent and lazy to a man (or woman).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  46. Not 'Gaslighting' by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gaslighting isn't just being a douchebag.

    Watch the original film. It's all about one person doing a spectrum of things to make the second person question their own judgement, their own recollection of facts, and even their own sanity. It's about undermining someone's OWN sense of their worth, abilities, and memory - not trying to make them look bad in front of other people. If they CAN make their victim so full of self-doubt that they won't even try to get a third party to weigh in, it's just that much better. But, as in the movie, the whole point was for a villain to throw his victim off the trail while he spent time searching the house for something valuable - to make her doubt her own judgement and soundness of mind that she wouldn't trust herself to question what he was up to.

    The OP is completely mis-using the term.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Not 'Gaslighting' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the fact that at least part of the time someone's sanity is suspect and it's not some guy sabotaging you. If you have any history of schizophrenia in your family, have that checked out for your own sake and your family's.

      Mind you, I say this as someone who had a paranoid schizophrenic dad who murdered mom....

    2. Re:Not 'Gaslighting' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it's not successful, it could still be an attempt at gaslighting. Unscheduling or rescheduling things without consulting someone is a classic gaslighting move, for example. The description of the situation is a little light, but it doesn't sound like it's "definitely not gaslighting". From the situation described, it could easily be a gaslighting attempt that the OP simply isn't falling for.

    3. Re:Not 'Gaslighting' by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      No. Because when you unschedule something, there's a simple log showing who did it. The point of gaslighting is to make you wonder if YOU did it, and doubt your own ability to remember your own actions. Remember: the term comes from a movie, where that's what happened. It's not the same as "people doing stuff to make you look bad."

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Not 'Gaslighting' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to 2017. This year's annoying overused term is "gaslighting". Last year it was "doubling down".

  47. If He's A Superior Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He probably feels as though your method of operation is slowing down work and hindering him in the process. Exceptional engineers are very particular about getting things done, if someone sits between them and the information they need, mismanages, poses shit architectural decisions or wastes time excessively (i.e. they are covering your salary) they get pissed. It's entirely worth taking a step back and asking yourself "what have I done to piss off someone more skilled" and trying to correct it from there if you intend to try staying on, but more likely it would be better for you both if you went a different route.

    1. Re:If He's A Superior Engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, after reading your blog - it appears you might be legitimately insane. You have entire sections on "Ego" and "Psychological Self-Defense." Stop looking at the world doing wrong things to you and start looking at how you can improve yourself.

  48. Need to be able to leave that job by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2

    I've experienced gaslighting. Many of us in IT have experienced hostile work environments. There are many options for dealing with it. By far the easiest, fastest way is to simply leave. You're not leaving just for your own mental well being. Another reason to leave is to take their power away, gives them less room to maneuver when abusing your former colleagues.

    Unfortunately, many employees don't position themselves to be able to do that without prohibitive loss. And employers encourage that! Ever have your boss suggest you should buy a new car and house? I have, more than once. I didn't understand why that was any of their business the 1st time. Now I know that's why. They think of you as a "flight risk", and like the idea of you feeling chained to your job by debt up to your eyeballs. Lose that job and your life blows up. You lose your house, spouse, car, the respect of your friends, your credit rating, etc. They have code phrases for this, stuff like "showing team spirit" and "commitment". There are sick managers out there who enjoy bullying and abusing hapless underlings.

    If you are determined to hang on for financial reasons, pride in your successes, don't want to leave under a cloud of failure, don't want to be labeled a quitter and a wimp, feel like there are still worthy people you can help, or the environment isn't completely horrible and has its redeeming qualities, and whatever other reasons, there's still much else you can do. There will always be some crap to handle at any job, and it is impractical to walk out on every employer unless you're independently wealthy and can retire at the age of 30 or some such. Still improve your financial situation. Next, keeping records is huge. Get all the gaslighters' crap down in writing. Ask them to email or text you, not just give you verbal instructions which can be denied later. Do it smoothly too, don't be verbally demanding, just be firm and put your time to use on other duties until they give you written instruction. What may very well happen is that they get cold feet. They don't want a paper trail showing what scumbags they really are. They'll foam at the mouth with rage and frustration, but they will back down if they have any brains. They may not, they may indeed give it to you in writing. They may try to weasel around with their written instructions. If they threaten to fire you, call them on that. Tell them you're waiting, hurry up and fire you already. It usually is a bluff, but it may not be, and if so, that's okay too. Being fired is not the end of the world.

    A big problem is assessing management demands. It can sometimes be very hard to tell if they really are asking for too much. Asking for perpetual motion is too much. Asking for the moon might not be. Likely they have no idea either. It's their job to work that out, not come up with a schedule out of thin air but get input from their experts and work it out. But sometimes managers are lazy on that and try to compensate by bullying their underlings. Ask you for a schedule, then behind your back alter it to cut the time way down, and throw in a few simple little extras that aren't so simple or little. In any case, it's not good to declare some demand is impossible and unreasonable and walk out, if it wasn't.

    So there it is. Free yourself from your own desperation. Whichever way things work out, years later you'd like to be proud of the decisions you made and the manner you handled yourself. No job is worth breaking laws you respect and treacherously throwing colleagues under the bus. There are bigger things in life than that. No job is worth your self respect. Being unemployed is hard, but it is not The End.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  49. Suck it up, buttercup by adosch · · Score: 1

    Hurray! My first /. Soapbox of 2017 and even higher hopes of an anon-coward "gaslighting" me up!

    So for starters, everyone one, every job, every workplace has this, and my only condolense is: that sucks to be in your position.

    Now back to reality. Yep, cant go to management or your boss because you will get a improvement-plan-to-let-go-in-3-months or you will be viewed as not being a "good fit" and the pain will continue until you quit or get fires for blowing your top. Why? Because I have met more managers who get paid the "people manage" money to deal with that shit and guess what? They never do.

    If you havent got feedback from your boss or manager that echo's any of this back to you in writing, then whats the problem? I have always said: if you are right, you can't br wrong. Sharpen your game --- you seem to know and highlight all their angles, so tactfully neutralize them as much as you can "professionally" (I stress that)

    Otherwise you start applying for a new job or you hang in there and suck it up. Because if you get another shiny, new job, I dont want to see you re-post advice, guess what? Grass isnt ever greener, always politics and bullshit. All you do is cash in old complaints for new ones. Learn to handle your job like a sports athlete: you get paid to do a job to produce output and results, negortiate as much as you can and do it well. When its time to go, ask for a trade or go to a new team./p>

    1. Re:Suck it up, buttercup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurray! My first /. Soapbox of 2017 and even higher hopes of an anon-coward "gaslighting" me up!

      So for starters, everyone one, every job, every workplace has this, and my only condolense is: that sucks to be in your position.

      Now back to reality. Yep, cant go to management or your boss because you will get a improvement-plan-to-let-go-in-3-months or you will be viewed as not being a "good fit" and the pain will continue until you quit or get fires for blowing your top. Why? Because I have met more managers who get paid the "people manage" money to deal with that shit and guess what? They never do.

      If you havent got feedback from your boss or manager that echo's any of this back to you in writing, then whats the problem? I have always said: if you are right, you can't br wrong. Sharpen your game --- you seem to know and highlight all their angles, so tactfully neutralize them as much as you can "professionally" (I stress that)

      Otherwise you start applying for a new job or you hang in there and suck it up. Because if you get another shiny, new job, I dont want to see you re-post advice, guess what? Grass isnt ever greener, always politics and bullshit. All you do is cash in old complaints for new ones. Learn to handle your job like a sports athlete: you get paid to do a job to produce output and results, negortiate as much as you can and do it well. When its time to go, ask for a trade or go to a new team./p>

      You could always send out a bunch of resumes in the name of said rockstar employee to a bunch of competitors and give his boss and bosses boss as references and when the reference checkers start calling the boss and bosses boss, it looks like he is not happy there and he will of course deny looking to move and wonder what is going on, thinking he himself has been gaslighted. Best case scenario he will get fired and you will get promoted. Two can play the gas lighting game.

    2. Re: Suck it up, buttercup by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      In what world do people check references before talking to the individual? Hint: It doesn't happen ... EVER.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  50. redirection by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

    If he's as paranoid as he sounds then indirectly give him the idea that a superior or peer of equal tenure is gunning for him. I just spent the last two years dealing with an incompetent manager who everyone knew was incompetent but his boss was too proud to admit he had made a mistake in hiring him. Less than a month after he started one of his employees quit and sited him as the reason she quit. HR followed up and seven other people myself included filed formal complaints. HR found no grounds for dismissal. Over the last two years he's been filed on over twelve times. Last month he made the mistake of pulling his passive aggressive crap on one of the directors and *poof* his ass was gone. Sometimes it's not what they are doing as much as who they are doing it to.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  51. Advice other than changing jobs by Walt+Sellers · · Score: 1

    I don't know any "unofficial" ways to deal with this that you have not heard. I have wondered if a group "intervention" might work, but I have never seen it tried in a workplace. I have tried talking bluntly to some difficult people. The results have varied. I think the times when I got some good results, I had kept their point of view in mind. Be prepared to have more than one such conversation.

    Getting anyone to change behavior may be very difficult if the behavior has been allowed for a long time. If unofficial ways don't work, then you will need the help of someone above the gaslighter. (But that is an "official" way to do something, which was not your question.)

    So below this point is a compromise of some "unofficial" ways to get "official" help.

    You might discuss your concerns with managers or directors who are not involved, but are in nearby or related departments which share upper management. Pick one that has been in the company long enough to know upper managers. They can tell you which person up the chain will probably listen.

    If there is a group that goes out for food and drinks after work occasionally, go with them. You may get more open advice away from the company's office. You may find that they start the conversation by asking you about the gaslighter.

    Do all of this respectfully. If you come across as just bashing the gaslighter and your own boss, you may hurt yourself. Try to remember that you may want a job reference in the future.

    When you find the right person to approach for "official" help, keep the company's interests in mind while making your case.

  52. Options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like the kind of person who says nothing after you have waited 20 minutes in line, you are next up to be served at the cash register and somebody cuts ahead of you in line. Experience has taught me that you can do one or two of these three things.

    1) You can complain to your superiors which is risky. It may pay off or you may be tagged as a whiner and a snitch (most likely outcome).

    2) You can be aggressive, the meek will not inherit the earth. If somebody cuts ahead of you in line throw them out of the line then tell them to fuck off and join the back of the queue like everybody else. That's what I've done on several occasions. The only way to deal with bullies is stand up to them and it is always better than invoking an authority figure. Bosses tend to be Alpha types and will sympathise with the bully. The problem with giving in to bullies and letting them get away with walking all over you is that you are not only encouraging their behaviour but you are reenforcing their belief that they are entitled to behave this way. Make it abundantly clear to your persecutor that his/her criticism and micromanagement is not wanted, secure your files, schedule what they unschedule back, preferably at the last minute, and if they complain tell them in a firm tone of voice that two can play this game. Growl, snarl and if needed bite. This is no different than a couple of wolves fighting over a scrap of food. You need to establish your place in the pack.

    3) You can conclude that this is an awful place to work, find a new job and resign. Tell your boss why you are quitting if they bother to ask and then move on to enjoy your new and better work environment.

    I strongly recommend option #2 followed by option #3. You can also go straight to option #3 but it's always better to suck it up and try option #2 first.

  53. Knock their f**kin head off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quit being a p*ssy...didn't you know this is the new era of Trump.

  54. Not really gaslighting by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are a bully, but NOT gaslighting. If they where, you wouldn't ever know it. The idea behind gaslighting is to make someone question their own sanity or "efforts to manipulate someone's sense of reality" This is a funny version of gaslighting. If someone is that much of an asshole, I'd be looking for another job ASAP.

    They should probably try to find out if other people have had these issues with this employee. Talk to HR, as that's supposed to be "confidential". Don't mention names at first, just tell them the situation at first. Make sure THEY are documenting it. But, yeah, it sounds like it's time to move on. Make sure you update your resume.

    1. Re:Not really gaslighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should probably try to find out if other people have had these issues with this employee. Talk to HR, as that's supposed to be "confidential". Don't mention names at first, just tell them the situation at first. Make sure THEY are documenting it. But, yeah, it sounds like it's time to move on. Make sure you update your resume.

      Do NOT "Talk to HR".

      Human Resources is paid for by the company and works to further the interests of the company, period.

      HR puts on a friendly face and asks employees to communicate problems at work.
      What this actually means is, "Please tell us everything that you're going to tell your lawyer before you sue the company. We like to get out ahead of that kind of thing."

      If somebody is creating a "hostile work environment" (remember these exact words, they are very important), the first person you talk to is a lawyer familiar with labor law.
      Your lawyer will instruct you on what information you need to collect.
      Your lawyer will "Talk to HR" for you.

  55. I'll follow this one as.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As my friend was just fired for a boss and his subs setting him up to get fired this past Wednesday in Cleveland.

    The insurance company is so clueless of the inter-office backstabbing that they either fire the wrong person or drive them out. I kept telling my friend to let others know the truth when the false statements were made. Unfortunately, his emotional state is not one to be confrontational and I doubt that he spoke up and now he's paying the price.

    I'm hoping that there is enough evidence within the systems to prove that he was betrayed and that we can sue the company for that as well as having a hostile work environment.

  56. Turnabout is fair play ... by MondoGordo · · Score: 1

    Cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war .... or if you're on a budget. http://www.thinkgeek.com/produ...

  57. What, no "kick his ass" ? by frankenheinz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Millennial pussyfoots, I guess.

    --
    The law is not an ass. No really.
  58. Quit Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, Microsoft is not for everybody. Just leave.

  59. Go postal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a machine gun and empty it on the bastard and all the other coworkers participating in the abusive behavior. The company in question will notice that something is wrong, at the department where you are working, for sure.

  60. Several conflict resolution strategies by nuntius · · Score: 2

    Most organizations have difficult people. Some pairs of people just get on each other's nerves. Often it comes down to circumstances -- did you meet at the beginning of a stressful period? Others who remember the "good old days" may have fond memories that help them through the present. etc.

    In order to build a healthy career, you have to learn how to manage these situations productively. People who master the skill get promoted.

    Some advice: Don't take it personally. Don't let the problem fester. Don't be overly aggressive. Do your homework. Proceed with caution. Scout out how your peers feel about this individual. Do others have strategies for working with him? Calmly approach the other individual, talk about the issues, and make sure they understand what you perceive as inappropriate actions. Sometimes people lose track and appreciate the wake-up call (especially introverted engineers). If it is intentional, try to find out why -- maybe you can call a truce or forge an alliance. Walking away over one person sounds extreme. Can you find a new project or role that reduces your interaction with this one individual? If you have issues with numerous people than walking might be more appropriate.

    I would also recommend the book "Win-Win Negotiating" by Jandt and Gillette.

    1. Re:Several conflict resolution strategies by Walt+Sellers · · Score: 1

      In order to build a healthy career, you have to learn how to manage these situations productively. People who master the skill get promoted.

      It is healthy for your career. Making sure your manager knows how well you are handling it is an important part of the getting a promotion.

  61. Politics by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 2

    It depends. Sometimes people higher up the management chain don't know what's going on. Impressing those people can work. Calling the gaslighter on it can work. Accounting for the time you've had to spend dealing with him and showing how much that has cost the company can work. It's very dependent on the politics of the situation.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
  62. leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leave

  63. avoid them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As suggested in the link, I'd "avoid them entirely" if possible, although it's easier said then done. A common trap is to discuss what you're working on when with them. If they ask, just change the subject. Don't ask them what they're working on.

    If they're supposed to be your mentor, then try your best to seek out other colleagues. This may give you the opportunity to sneakishly switch out to another dept with colleagues you click better with.

    I find detecting these people is the harder part. My red flag is when they're constantly curious about what you're doing and not really contributing anything about themselves.

  64. Peer Reviews by kjell79 · · Score: 1

    In the case of code or written material, peer reviews are the great equalizer here. If you have a tool that keeps track of comments persistently, then you have a record of their comments when you invited them to review your work. If they chose not to review it, then that's on them (and likely reflects poorly on them). The secondary benefit is that you also likely will have other colleagues who also reviewed the same content. So if the gaslighting colleague tries to pull this kind of crap, you have peers that likely will help your cause because it would reflect bad upon their ability to critique your work.

    If they're affecting aspects of your job that do not fall into this category, find another way of documenting it in an independently verifiable way. If that's not possible, I recommend finding a different job.

  65. Please stop overusing the term gaslighting... by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see the term gaslighting being thrown around so much in the last year, but most people really don't seem to understand what it means. This is not gaslighting. Gaslighting is *literally* trying to convince the *victim* that they are insane or misremembering real incidents or facts.

    In this case their point is not to make the victim think they are crazy or wrong, it's to convince others that they are screwing things up. That's just basic bullying, undermining, or backstabbing. Not gaslighting.

  66. Semantics... by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those not familiar, I mean "bullies unscheduling things you've scheduled, misplacing files and other items that you are working on and co-workers micro-managing you and being particularly critical of what you do and keeping it under their surveillance.

    The term Gaslighting does not mean, what the submitter believes it means:

    The term originates in the systematic psychological manipulation by the main character of a victim in the 1938 stage play Gas Light, known as Angel Street in the United States, and the film adaptations released in 1940 and 1944. In the story, a husband attempts to convince his wife and others that she is insane by manipulating small elements of their environment and insisting that she is mistaken, remembering things incorrectly, or delusional when she points out these changes. The original title stems from the dimming of the gas lights in the house that happened when the husband was using the gas lights in the attic while searching for hidden treasure. The wife accurately notices the dimming lights and discusses the phenomenon, but the husband insists she just imagined a change in the level of illumination.

    The term "gaslighting" has been used colloquially since the 1960s[5] to describe efforts to manipulate someone's sense of reality. In a 1980 book on child sexual abuse, Florence Rush summarized George Cukor's 1944 film version of Gas Light, and writes, "even today the word gaslighting is used to describe an attempt to destroy another's perception of reality."

    The question itself remains valid, but the misuse of the term is so annoying, I'm not going to give my (very valuable) advice on the subject.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those not familiar, I mean "bullies unscheduling things you've scheduled, misplacing files and other items that you are working on and co-workers micro-managing you and being particularly critical of what you do and keeping it under their surveillance.

      The term Gaslighting does not mean, what the submitter believes it means:

      The term originates in the systematic psychological manipulation by the main character of a victim in the 1938 stage play Gas Light, known as Angel Street in the United States, and the film adaptations released in 1940 and 1944. In the story, a husband attempts to convince his wife and others that she is insane by manipulating small elements of their environment and insisting that she is mistaken, remembering things incorrectly, or delusional when she points out these changes. The original title stems from the dimming of the gas lights in the house that happened when the husband was using the gas lights in the attic while searching for hidden treasure. The wife accurately notices the dimming lights and discusses the phenomenon, but the husband insists she just imagined a change in the level of illumination.

      The term "gaslighting" has been used colloquially since the 1960s[5] to describe efforts to manipulate someone's sense of reality. In a 1980 book on child sexual abuse, Florence Rush summarized George Cukor's 1944 film version of Gas Light, and writes, "even today the word gaslighting is used to describe an attempt to destroy another's perception of reality."

      The question itself remains valid, but the misuse of the term is so annoying, I'm not going to give my (very valuable) advice on the subject.

      I get what you mean.. You are saying they keep using that word and you do not think it means what thy think it means right? That is from a movie too. I suppose next you will claim he killed your father and to prepare to die, before your nerdy ass gets tackled by security and thrown out on the tarmac!

    2. Re:Semantics... by Bruinwar · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Every asshole co-worker is not necessarily gaslighting you. Even with spreading innuendos, outright lies, backstabbing, & direct sabotage, it's not gaslighting, it's a common problem of having a asshole co-worker. IMO %50 of the population of this planet are assholes so chances are good that changing jobs fixes nothing.

      I've dealt with these ongoing issues using direct confrontation, building good relationships with the non-asshole co-workers, & being damn sure I do my job very well. The reasons these assholes behave the way they do is because they feel threatened by you. I just continue to directly confront them until they back off & do my job obsessively well. Soon enough they will back off or show they incompetency.

      --
      SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT
    3. Re:Semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The term Gaslighting [wikipedia.org] does not mean, what the submitter believes it means

      What the submitter wrote matches reasonably in my comprehension what the husband did in the play you cite.

      What is the difference that you see, mi?

    4. Re:Semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you gaslighting him?!?

  67. It's the only way to be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sabotage his work. Hard. Enough that his entire reputation crashes within a month or two. Get up early so that car troubles make him consistently late, and have a buddy from a collection agency start calling him.

    Nuke his career from orbit. Be very careful to stay above suspicion. Maybe you have a teenage son who'd greatly enjoy the devious change in chores and spike in allowance?

  68. Yes, GTHO out of there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I worked for a company that was doing some MSP work for a client. It started when a co-worker kept asking about a long configuration I did, I sent a reply, and he sent a reply to managers with what I said changed which didn't help me look good. I quietly turned on message signatures via S/MIME, problem solved there.

    It really came to a head when I was doing some work on a broken web server. I had some backups saved of config files. I made a modification, it didn't work, went to back out changes... and my backups were gone. I then looked to see who was on, and the only other person was this co-worker. A quick look at .sh_history in his homedir showed he blew away each file one by one, with typos. I popped screenshots of this.

    The code approval system used URL links to an internal code repository as well for fetching and testing. Normally, developers were supposed to put different dates and keep every rev and URL of releases unique, so there is a history of artifacts that eventually get archived off. Well, the co-worker had some working code which passed QA tests. I went to move the file from testing to production, checked the hashes... the file was changed. Even though he swore up and down that no files were changed, the hashes and dates were different. I let management know with my screenshots and documentation. They told me to STFU and deal with him. However, because the guy was from another group, he had no repercussions for his actions.

    Things went on like this for a while. Thankfully the co-worker was too stupid to understand what RCS and etckeeper were. He decided to play games of deleting config files while stuff was running, after excluding them from the backups.

    Management would not do a single thing, because his manager was well away from IT and didn't give a rats's ass what IT's problems were. I couldn't yank his access because it was explicitly granted from much higher on.

    Had a production machine seize up during business hours. Found /boot empty. Looked at the logs I had remotely hidden away, found the machine went down just after someone ssh-ed in from the IP address belonging to this co-workers name. Went to HR and management, got told to stop whining and "lrn 2 deal with other departments" [sic], so I handed them my badge, a special piece of paper with all passwords and such, told them that I would be letting myself out the back door, and that I took an Uber to work (I had a feeling it would come to a head that day, so didn't drive), so you don't have to worry about my car in their parking garage.

    Now here is the ironic thing:

    It has been a long time since I've left that company. The job description for the position I left is still there on job boards and is constantly renewed.

    1. Re:Yes, GTHO out of there by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      You shouldn't have given them ALL the passwords. "Sorry, that's all I've got. Jerkface must have deleted the rest. You deal with it." As a famous comedian said, "Always leave them wanting more." :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  69. parking lot beating by siamesevodka · · Score: 1

    When I was in my 20's [a long time ago in a galaxy far far away] I worked construction on a coal fired power plant. It was a pretty good sized project with around 1500 people. If you had a beef with your coworkers it got settled out in the parking lot at the end of the day. I didn't believe this was possible. But I was proved wrong when I went to get in my car to go home and there were two people going at it in front of my car.It was a supervisor and a worker. Never found out what the beef was about, but had to wait until the fight was over to go home as they found the dirt most comfortable in front of my car and a crowd had gathered. Sometimes it gets down to this, but quit the job first before you clock the guy, as it looks better on your resume for the next job.

    1. Re:parking lot beating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes it gets down to this, but quit the job first before you clock the guy, as it looks better on your resume for the next job.

      The problem with this course of action is that, while emotionally satisfying, it's been my experience that most folks in the white-collar workplace are more likely to call the police than settle a conflict physically because they're cowards. I've had exactly one person that I felt would be worth jail time for that, and that was the CEO of a company that years ago knowingly stiffed us on payroll, and then fired me when I said I wasn't coming back until the payroll issue was resolved (which it never was). He was clever enough to ensure that the cost of recovering the money from his under-capitalized subsidiary was more than what I'd practically be able to get, and I still occasionally take perverse pleasure in thinking about catching him after work and ensuring he never walks again.

  70. Play the game or don't by m00sh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Number one rule of not being bullied is to be part of a pack. Don't be singled out. Form a pack with your other colleagues.

    So, either drum up the popular support and find a way to change the gaslighter. This option will take a lot of energy and it will take away from your work and life.

    Or, leave and find somewhere else.

    1. Re:Play the game or don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Number one rule of not being bullied is to be part of a pack

      No. Number one rule of not being bullied is to transcend the whole bullshit game that is the totem pole hierarchy mentality. Hard to do with bullies in grade school, but easy to do in a professional environment. Don't play the game and you can't lose it.

    2. Re:Play the game or don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think murdering him is the way to go.

  71. avoid them by ordirules · · Score: 0

    As suggested in the link, I'd "avoid them entirely," although easier said then done. If they ask about your work, change the subject (it's a trap). Don't ask them about their work. If they're your mentor, seek out developing relations with other colleagues. That way if things get rough, you may have an opportunity to sneak out into your colleagues dept. I find detecting these people is the hard part. My red flag is when they're constantly curious about your work, and not contributing anything about theirs. In my opinion, the more aggressive route usually doesn't work, and leads to wasting time. Just beat your own drum, and get your results in. Your hard work, and relations with other colleagues will carry more weight than their delusions.

  72. Bluff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This technique might buy you a month or two to look for a new job (depending on how high up this guy is). Simply walk up to the a-hole (when alone) and inform him (in an authoritative voice) "Look, I know someone on the board. If this $hit doesn't stop now, I'll have you termed." Make him think YOU have power over him.

  73. Punch him in the dick by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    If you can't confront them, or talk to them, or talk to your boss, or go through channels and you're effectively deadlocked in the status quo...

    1. You probably don't understand your workplace very well.
    2. You should leave.
    3. Punch him in the dick on your way out. Or now. Or in the parking lot. Or follow him home and punch him in the dick there. But the most important thing you can do is to connect your knuckles to his pecker.

  74. Easy by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    "Raising things through the official channels is out of the question"

    You can't even talk about it? Quit immediately. You don't deserve that kind of bullshit. Any company that can't talk about personel issues is not one you want to work for. Let them crash and burn.

    However, unless the douche is the owner's kid, I bet someone will hear you out. Start a new job search before bringing it up, just to be safe.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  75. play a little tit for tat by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and do the same thing back to them, only worse, hit them where it would cost them a lot of money like ordering a bunch of porn with the company credit card, all because they were trying to mess with my mind, and just before i left i would wipe all the harddrives on every computer i could get my hands on, and have them all booted with a live USB linux playing an infinite loop of some porno video, with a post-it note on each monitor sayng: "who is screwing who?"

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  76. Code reviews. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > poring over every source-code commit, and then criticizing it even if the criticism is contradictory to what he previously said

    This is one reason why code reviews for every commit are absurd.

    There are many others.

  77. Re:Easy - Play to their Ego by Joska · · Score: 1

    Oops, I see now that I essentially duplicated the above comment and advice a bit further down, and yes, it did work perfectly for me as well.

  78. Build a coalition, then use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are the only person that he seems to affect, then it's you, move on and start over. If he's what you say that he is, then others also dislike him. Make others stakeholders in your projects so that it is more than just you that is harmed by his attacks and micromanagement. Then use that coalition to make noise to management. Collectively, your value outweighs his. If one person raises an issue, then they can be dismissed as a complainer. When multiple persons raise the same issue (and are well documented and consistent), then management will struggle to ignore them.

  79. Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it. by aussersterne · · Score: 0

    Lose the DailyKos talk. "Gaslighting?"

    You are not being abused. Employment is voluntary. Again, if you try to paint yourself as the victim of something unethical, management is going to want to see the backside of you very quickly. They want go-to problem-solvers who don't stumble over basic interpersonal issues, not people who feel sorry for themselves while virtue-signaling.

    Don't go in and say "Another employee is gaslighting meeee!" unless you want them to laugh at you mercilessly (before firing you) when they're having drinks at 7:30 pm.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The irony here is you are saying "Lose the DailyKos talk" and then use some weird slang of "virtue-signaling"
      WTF does that mean?
      I asked another poster who used that earlier but they did not reply.


      You do have a point that just pointing out instances of bullying is better than using the slang term "gaslighting" even if it fits better for people who know that slang.

    2. Re:Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony here is you are saying "Lose the DailyKos talk" and then use some weird slang of "virtue-signaling"
      WTF does that mean?
      I asked another poster who used that earlier but they did not reply.

      You do have a point that just pointing out instances of bullying is better than using the slang term "gaslighting" even if it fits better for people who know that slang.

      Indeed, this is why gas lighting usually works, because calling the gas lighter out on said behavior is pointed to as plausibly deniable "character assassination". The problem doesn't stop there either, if you call them out without having them 100% dead to rights in the eyes of everyone involved at the very start (which is very hard to pull of in the first place) Their accusals of you engaging in character assassination will justify their character assassination of you after you have left in the eyes of bystanders. It is not fair but it is how this BS game works. This is why bullies who engage in gas lighting are such pansies to begin with (Think of the character Curley in John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men.. who picked on people 3X his size.. if he beat them then he was a tough guy.. if he lost to them then the people who beat him should be picking on someone their own size.. therefore no matter what happened he couldn't lose.)

      My point is that calling someone out on such bad behavior usually is playing into their game and does not usually have good results despite what common sense and common decency would seem to dictate.

  80. Wait until s/he is elected President by dcsmith · · Score: 1

    ...of the United States and moves on.

    --
    This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
  81. Consider the Painfully Obvious by LifesABeach · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're trying to be a team player with an Antagonist; DO NOT TRUST ANYTHING THIS PERSON DOES OR SAYS! STOP! Communicate everything using eMail, Twitter, what ever. Create a communications trail. When someone asks what's going on, simply state, "I think X is having a bad day." Always be freindly, SMILE, ask how that person's day is going. If that person pops off, then pop off with that status on their part of the project. Make communications public. After awhile, and some well documented failures that will occur because the bully can't be both a bully and good at their job. Personal will contact the bully. Your problem is solved.

  82. Be vocal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call them out when they pull any of that garbage. They are doing it because you and everyone else gives them a pass. An overview of their interference during a meeting will shut them up pretty quick.

    I had a coworker spreading the rumor thar I was an incompotent lead around the office. I brought their work in as an example of common QA errors and correted it on the spot. Never heard from them again.

  83. Some sage advice from a grizly engineer by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    If it is really that bad, leave.

    However, if you want to stay, first and foremost, put the effort into where you have control: yourself. You need to take a long hard look in the mirror. Look at your work history over the last 5 years. How has it been? Talk to other colleagues you have worked with (besides the person you have an issue with). Ask them for one thing that you could improve. If they all say you should schedule fewer meetings, your "gaslighter" may simply be done putting up with your excessive meetings and is sending you a direct message (did s/he ever mention this to you before). I try to ask my manager every 4 months what I could do better (I actually have a reminder on my calendar). It follows that you must take the advice you get to heart and really work on the area your manager suggests as well. You would be amazed at how this raises your credibility with management and at the same time can often give you avenues for improvement that you had not considered before.

    I have worked in engineering for many years now, and I NEVER leave files I need on common/shared or any networked locations accessible to others unless there is strict version control/tracking/rollback in effect. Working in a team environment it is just too easy for someone else to delete a file or overwrite it on accident with no malice at all, just in the course of doing work. I always keep my files on my local machine and back up to a USB drive every few days and then put copies on the network drive (I don't care how many times management asks for me to work out of network locations, it is stupid and I don't do it). This resolves your changed/deleted files issue.

    Next, I tend to take notes during or after meetings formal or informal and email them out to the team immediately after with a header something along the lines of "to review my understanding of our last meeting/conversation etc." and then list off the key points as well as any action items and who is responsible for them. This is an effective way of mitigating people who have selective amnesia later on, and would resolve that issue that you have with this co worker.

    I do most of this as a matter of course because of various people over the years who have exhibited one type of behavior or another, but at the end of the day, doing this makes you a better, more valuable employee and I can almost guarantee that one of two things will happen, either you will realize that it was you creating the problems all along and you will become better at doing your job, or the gaslighter employee will be thwarted and forced to do his own work and his rockstar reputation will be diminished as contradictions start to come to light. This won't solve all of your problems, but it will go a long ways.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  84. Screw it up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is "their" work, so screw it up. Or keep saying you'll do it, but never do.

    Cancelled schedule? Go ahead without their input, presupposing their answers to fit your case. Document that the meeting couldn't happen, so you both agreed to keep momentum rather than stop (yes, lie. what are they going to do? Minute meetings about cancelled meetings?). Hiding papers? use "cc" request and phrase it as an "update on what the progress is". And make it "positive", e.g. "And barry is collecting the information for me, but he wants to make sure he has it right, so is checking again", then "Barry is still going through his submission to the project").

  85. Good ideas for use with the asshat at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has given me some ideas to deal with the asshat at work.
    Hopefully help him get out the door faster...

  86. Thanks for giving this a name by fadethepolice · · Score: 1

    From my experience this happens at almost every office. I've stopped leaving because of it as you'll never get stability. It's probably tougher from a strict coding perspective, but for me I work in an engineering office and we do a lot of cad design and gis. Since the GIS is a separate set of skills I just moved to a task that the people gaslighting me could not understand and excelled at it. At which point, you can just wait them out and refuse to let them gain legitimacy by them instructing you on the 'proper' way of doing things in order to claim that your skill is because of their ability to teach you. It's actually really fun to totally ignore the gaslighter and then excel at your job. When they go to management and claim your failure point it out as them not understanding what you are doing. When they try to look over your shoulder at your screen to teach you, stop working and look at them and converse about things not related to work in a charming positive way that makes them laugh. Wait for the deadlines to come in and them get distracted then do your thing better than them for lower budget. Make yourself useful to management while smiling at them, ignoring them, and don't do what they say while agreeing to their face. Keep a positive attitude, realize that they are sad individuals with less skill that need to use intrigue to promote themselves and advanced your skill set in a way that makes it obviouse to everyone in the office that you are far superior to them and they are just pushing their weight around in order t compensate for their own inadequacies.

    1. Re:Thanks for giving this a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience this happens at almost every office. I've stopped leaving because of it as you'll never get stability. It's probably tougher from a strict coding perspective, but for me I work in an engineering office and we do a lot of cad design and gis. Since the GIS is a separate set of skills I just moved to a task that the people gaslighting me could not understand and excelled at it. At which point, you can just wait them out and refuse to let them gain legitimacy by them instructing you on the 'proper' way of doing things in order to claim that your skill is because of their ability to teach you. It's actually really fun to totally ignore the gaslighter and then excel at your job. When they go to management and claim your failure point it out as them not understanding what you are doing. When they try to look over your shoulder at your screen to teach you, stop working and look at them and converse about things not related to work in a charming positive way that makes them laugh. Wait for the deadlines to come in and them get distracted then do your thing better than them for lower budget. Make yourself useful to management while smiling at them, ignoring them, and don't do what they say while agreeing to their face. Keep a positive attitude, realize that they are sad individuals with less skill that need to use intrigue to promote themselves and advanced your skill set in a way that makes it obviouse to everyone in the office that you are far superior to them and they are just pushing their weight around in order t compensate for their own inadequacies.

      This!

      I have found in a lot of interpersonal interactions that any emotional reinforcement you give, good or bad, positive or negative reinforces that behavior ever time!
      In the case of the gas lighter asshole, your best bet is to ignore him, or give the best impression that you can that what they are doing does not affect you at all. It has been said by many wise persons in the past that the cruelest thing you can do to a person is ignore them. Trust me that this rockstar employee will hate this and it will drive them to sabotage themselves and their own success. If you respond to what they do in such a way that it puts you on the defensive, you are acknowledging that they have won to a point. You are reinforcing bad behavior. If you respond emotionally in such a way that the aggressor knows what they did got under your skin, they will do it more and more because they are like crack addicts for that kind of thing, do them a favor.. pull the needle out of their arm for them NOW!

  87. Having trouble understanding the question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to have built up into a major problem. And according to you, there's nothing you can do about it. Horsesh!t. First thing you probably should do is get a tattoo on your forehead: "VICTIM". One alternative is to grow a pair. First thing though, is to check (double-check) that he's not acting as a management surrogate. You need to get your boss's feedback on your performance, the good, the bad, and the ugly. The fact that you let this build up is on you, not him. You made a mistake. Learn from it. First (I said that already, I know), it is unacceptable for him to lose your files. One thing you (should have) learned as a teenager is that some people are not to be trusted. Well, he fooled you once, shame on him. After that, you need to learn how to use the word "no". A "person with savvy" knows how to say "yes" but mean "no". Oh, sure Joe, I've got that file - but I was just about to use it - I'll get it to you as soon as I'm done - when do you think you will return it? Oh, no problem Joe, I'm right in the middle of something, I'll dig it up when I finish, ok? Second. surveillance. I'm either not tracking well tonight, or parts of your post are incoherent. "misplacing files and other items that you are working on and co-workers micro-managing you and being particularly critical of what you do and keeping it under their surveillance." So, like he is spying on your files? So, its not one person, but a number of co-workers who are doing this to you? The key phrase, if you work in the USA or countries with similar social laws, is "hostile work environment". Management and HR are very very intolerant of that. As others have mentioned, you need to keep a log, but the idea that there's nothing a poor poor victim like yourself can do about a hostile co-worker is delusional. Of course, there ARE real risks in standing up for yourself, no question. So, stop being a victim, start proactively ADDRESSING the problem(s). Some possible solutions: he canceled the meeting. If it was your meeting, I don't see how that's possible. Next time, accidentally leave him off the attendee list. He's critical of your work product. Well, you do seem like you might me a thin-skinned prima dona, but you'd be a better judge of that than I. Assuming you're not, then if he's critical of you in public, call him on it. Never, ever lose your cool. Be polite, and tell him unless he's got specific constructive criticisms, further conversation on the topic needs to stop. If it's in private, tell him you value his input but want your manager to hear his comments as well - and then make a bee-line to your mgrs office/desk and ask him to repeat himself. If he is saying contradictory things, then point those out to him and your manager. (See, you knew that log you were keeping would come in handy!). There's little you can do about him making comments behind your back. Other than to keep on friendly terms with the rest of the staff, I can't think of anything constructive - except making sure your work is always top-notch. Generally, even a__holes like to think of themselves as a "good guy". You need to try to recruit him in fixing the problem. One possible suggestion, is to give him some code/work product to look through before the commit. Ask for his input before a time certain before commit. He'll either be helping you (assuming he has specific constructive points), or wasting his time. win-win. To me, in all candor (and I've been very blunt so far), you sound a bit young. There are many books which have been written on the subject of Dealing with Difficult People, and if you haven't, its time you started improving your game. It's something you'll be doing for the rest of your life - at least until you're in a situation with no bosses, no peers, no subordinates, no customers, and no significant others.

  88. If you think everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think everyone is out to get you. You are very highly likely the problem. Time to seek some counseling.

  89. Two options by shellster_dude · · Score: 2

    If this is a systemic problem in the company, then your best option is to get out as soon as possible because you aren't going to fix it.

    A lot of people who are responding are assuming a bad work environment is systemic when it may not be. It is surprising how many dillholes manage to build themselves empires inside of bigger corporations without getting caught. I have faced this exact scenario at a prior job (manager was exactly like this, and she also had a weird sexual thing for me. Tried to use the whole gas lighting thing as a power play). Company wasn't bad, just her section. I managed to win an ultimately get her fired. The trick in this situation is to find ways to document their behavior and the fact that you were on the right side of the issue, then "inadvertently" expose them when they try to screw you over. If it looks like you are gunning for them, you look like the bad guy. These guys pride themselves on always sucking up to management and looking like the good guy. Your job, if you think it is worth fighting the battle, is to reveal their skullduggery, but make it look innocent. An example from my experience. This manager told me to make a bunch of bad design choices on a client's product. I knew they were wrong, and I told her as much, but she cut me down in front of my colleagues and the client (by misrepresenting the choices). Later I emailed her and said, I must have misunderstood what she was asking, and would she please clarify (thus appearing to submit and getting her to document her explanation, while subtly documenting why I thought it was wrong and that I had explained it to her). Of course the project turned into a train wreck. Manager summoned me to her office, and frankly propositioned me or threatened to get me fired over it if I didn't go along. I refused. Then, when we were presenting, the now horribly screwed up project to the client, as well as upper management in our company, I made sure to print off those emails and take them with me. Of course the meeting was a disaster, the client was mad, as was our upper management. As soon as they started questioning why we'd made all of these stupid decisions, and ignored some of the their direct requests and needs, my manager immediately started to turn on me and the rest of the team. She tried to make it sound like she was blameless and couldn't understand why we'd gone against her direct orders. After letting her dig herself in deep for a minute or two, I pulled our her emails that I had printed off, and said, "You're right! I don't know why things got so out of hand. When I emailed you for clarification, I thought I was very clear on these client needs. Let's use this meeting to do some constructive, 'lessons-learned'. I figured you probably had a superior picture of the requirements, and so that's why I followed your directions to the best of my ability. It must have been my misunderstanding."

    Here I looked like I was just doing my job, and thought I'd made a mistake, but actually I exposed what a lying, piece of shit she was. A few days later, the rest of the team and I were each interviewed by upper management on how things had been going. Again, I didn't frame it as personal, or like I was trying to throw her under the bus, I just explained and showed email after email where I had tried to get clarification, after clearly explaining what she was demanding and why that wasn't a good choice, but each time I showed upper management the email, I pretended to be a bit naive on what could have gone wrong. Since I wasn't being "vindictive" it was pretty obvious where the problem was. The rest of my coworkers were only too happy to throw this lady under the bus because these types of jerks rarely screw with only one person. Next thing I knew, she got a forced "lateral promotion" to a dead-end position with no under-staff and shortly there-after got "laid-off".

  90. First, Ask Why by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    The question lists What they're doing but barely speculates as to Why, beyond "to look good."

    Most people I've seen treated this way get it because they've either badly or repeatedly screwed over colleagues.

    From the description, it's an environment where people don't have much trust in management/HR helping. In such a situation, where the gaslighter may well have a legitimate issue with the victim but, in the absence of legitimate channels, taking away their ability to succeed until they go away remains an apparent only choice.

    So first step is to consider if you've screwed then over. Not by your definition but by theirs. If so, start by mending bridges.

    Maybe it is nothing to do with the victim. Still ask why.

    Maybe they're a very insecure person, despite the rockstar talents the victim perceives.

    Maybe they're scared of someone less talented but younger and hotter.

    Or maybe they're hurting from other bad workplace drama, a bad manager, another bullying colleague, and lashing out where they can.

    Get to know them, understand them, empathize, build their trust, make yourself an ally they want to build up not tear down.

    Is that fair? Should you have to work with an unfair bully?

    No. Back when mommy could talk to the teacher, it wasn't fair.

    But this is the real world. In a good company, management and HR will help but this apparently isn't one. That leaves leaving (hurts you), fighting (often hurts you more) or being the bigger person to ensure you succeed.

    You're going to hit lots of unfair in your career. Working out how to win anyway is at least as important a skill as any technical one.

  91. Leave, and don't look back by Nuitari+The+Wiz · · Score: 1

    Its the same as when you have a supervisor that cannot be trusted or that sets you up to fail so that he looks good.
    I left his team for another team within the company, thankfully that was relatively easy. This allowed me to gather my wits around me and a few months later I left for a much better job at a company that actually listens to their developers.

    In the exit interview I made it abundantly clear that I left because of the bad supervisor, and I also took the time to praise the new one in the other team.
    I learned through the grapevine that the bad supervisor was eventually assigned a whole new team to start a new project. A few weeks in, they _all_ refused to keep working with him. Eventually HR reviewed his file and realize the toxicity he brought with himself. He got reassigned to a "special project team" and made it clear to him he won't be doing anything else until he left.

  92. What about the reverse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you deal with a coworker who does do things incorrectly or not at all, says he does things when he doesn't, shows up so rarely that his direct reports make that a common joke, and thinks giving control of company resources over to external entities is the height of efficiency?

  93. Not for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a similar issue with a supervisor. I waited until I was on very solid ground then berated him in private in a way that must have frightened him.
    I didn't touch him but was ready to if he raised a hand.

    I now have his respect, he just needed to see that side of me I guess.

    1. Re:Not for everyone by eyenot · · Score: 1

      In one case I let this supervisor misdirect me into making numerous mistakes on a potentially very dangerous job, until one time I simply said in a very stern voice, "[so-and-so], how about you let me get it done the right way." And he shut his stupid ass up after that and actually became a bit more productive. I learned later most other coworkers had done a similar thing but more along the lines of, "you know, [so-and-so], I think I'd be more comfortable doing it this way" so he always had a chip on his shoulder and never thought he had anything to improve. Just a few words can make a world of difference to someone.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  94. Work around the damage by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Work around the damage, do the best job you can and wait for their inevitable fuckup when they go after one too many people with this shit.
    I had a "dog ate my homework" type who kept trying to get me fired for losing all the work he was apparently doing on Friday afternoons when he was really going home early and ignoring deadlines. It had a positive effect in that I implemented more frequent filesystem snapshotting (on top of the existing tape backups) to counter his "the file servers keep losing files" claims. There was a lot of other stuff he did which resulted in more changes to work around the damage - the Simpsons joke "this ticket is not to be taken internally" and Homer saying "they wrote that because of me" comes to mind. Workflows ended up being documented in ridiculous detail because he'd find a weak point and deliberately fuck up and blame it on another. All of this stuff was very public. More than a couple of times managers took him aside for a quiet word about his activities and eventually he left.
    However if I was in a more junior position and had less time in the workplace that pathetic bully probably could have got me sacked in his first two months with nothing more than a series of wild claims. After a couple of months several managers knew he couldn't be trusted much but they needed someone to do the work, so long as he didn't go too far. The "dog ate my homework" thing was tried and disproved around ten times and management were making jokes about him, but it sounded pretty fucking serious the first time he tried that stunt and it could have got a junior staff member fired if he had blamed it on them early on.

  95. 2014 Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice that this isn't "news?"

    Easy answer, LEAVE!!!

    1. Re:2014 Article by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Yes, wanted to say this. I mean, it may be good to have a discussion for other folks dealing with tough work environments, so maybe it's not wasted, but the original poser of the question has likely wrapped this issue up one way or another more than a year ago.

  96. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  97. Super bad idea, keep it verbal by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And in the letter of resignation (perhaps a separate one to management, rather than one to your colleagues), document in great detail the actual reason for your departure.

    DO NOT DO THIS.

    Such a letter will come back to haunt you in some way. Either messing with some future job prospects or retaliation of some kind.

    Instead, there will be an exit interview, use that time to lay out, calmly and without emotion, the problems you have had. Then it's up to them to react to it or not. If they get combative just give up. But at least they will not have a paper trail to potentially harm you with later. Remember the whole reason you are even telling them is to help THEM, so if they are not receptive why would you push?

    Words of discontent and anger can always be made to make you look bad to someone who lacks context, or is provided a different context in which your words are placed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Resign professionally. Vent at the exit interview, if there is one. If it were being recorded, I'd STFU, personally.

    2. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      Perhaps I should clarify, then.

      Write a well-written letter of resignation, detailing the facts and verifiable events that led to your departure, in an informative and non-confrontational way. Express that you're choosing to leave the environment, rather than blaming the company. Avoid specifically naming the culprit, but frame the situation as a product of the environment that idealizes rock-stars at the expense of a healthy collaborative environment.

      While you're still in the company, any complaint you make about the company's favored genius can be construed as an attempt to advance your own career at their expense. Any threats to leave are also idle. You and your opponent are both still working here, so the company still gets the rock-star's work and whatever you manage to do when you're not complaining.

      In an exit interview, the attendance won't be as selective as a letter's addressees. Your manager may not have the power to do anything about the gaslighter if he's under a different manager's authority. HR may not be prepared to discuss another employee at your interview, so their hastily-scribbled notes may be the only actionable evidence. I've also seen companies treat the exit interview as their last chance to get information from an employee, so they'll bring in the resident expert to absorb any technical knowledge they can before it walks out the door. That would be very unproductive in this case.

      A letter puts you in control. You decide to whom it goes first, you decide exactly its tone and contents, and you decide how incriminating it actually is. In the worst case, someone pulls it out to use against you years later, and it's no less professional than a technical document. In the best case, it's the wake-up call and first-hand evidence that HR or management needs to start improving the company.

      Anecdote time. First, I've worked at a company that couldn't/wouldn't do anything punitive without primary written evidence. Verbal descriptions weren't good enough, because the company was large enough that the chain of command turned into a game of Telephone. I've also worked at a company that had a manager covering up for a bad apple, and watching the manager try to hide written evidence ended up making enough visible evidence to get them both fired.

      The reason you're telling management about the bullying isn't to help management. It's to help your ex-coworkers and colleagues who still have to stay in that environment. It may be too late for you, but management still has a chance to prevent the problem from getting worse. The purpose of the letter isn't to tell management why you personally left. It's to ensure that management is aware of a problematic situation that has caused the departure of at least one employee.

      In short, maintain your professionalism to the end and beyond. Say exactly what happened, and let management come to the conclusion of what to do about it.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Record it yourself or don't say a goddamn word.

      I'd say just don't say one word, period. They haven't earned it. Management knows and doesn't care. You said all you needed to before you quit, then you said it more clearly than any other way possible by saying 'I quit'. They don't deserve anything more.

      If you feel loyalty to coworkers, help them by hiring them away from the toxic place later.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You're leaving, yet still feel the need to put your future in jeopardy for no benefit to yourself?

      IMHO you have already given them all the free help they deserve and they ignored it. You have now put an exclamation on that by walking. Fuck em right in the ear.

      Hire away the good coworkers later. Those are the only people you should feel any loyalty to.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Do not bet on there being an exit interview. I have NEVER had a formal exit interview.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    6. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Write a well-written letter of resignation, detailing the facts and verifiable events that led to your departure

      A really pretty tiber lined hole is still a hole.

      In a verbal conversation you have the ability to include things that are not verifiable, but can be used by someone as a data point, that they may independently verify.

      In an exit interview, the attendance won't be as selective as a letter's addressees.

      This right here is the fundamental flaw in the "writing" path you propose. You are having someone imagine this letter will be read only by the person you are selectively sending it to. SO WRONG. Anything you put in writing ever, and I do mean ANYTHING (text, tweet, email, etc) you should assume will be read by your worst enemy.

      A letter puts you in control.

      A letter is utterly out of your control. It is a verifiable fact that you said something that you cannot deny. It contains words, down to the individual, that can be pulled out and taken out of contact and used to prove you have said something and you can say nothing against it because you did, in fact, write a letter.

      Anecdote time.

      My anecdote is that I've had issues with employers but never problems after. But I have seen letters used against people.

      The reason you're telling management about the bullying isn't to help management. It's to help your ex-coworkers and colleagues

      I said help the company. A warning issued verbally is something that anyone can act on to the best of their ability. A letter implies certain legal obligations and usually directives from upper management, HR, and the legal department (if the company is big enough) that tie the hands of people who may be able to change anything. The reaction of all large companies to threat is literally to seize up and ensure no changes are made.

      In short, maintain your professionalism to the end and beyond

      That is EXACTLY what I said. Writing a letter of complaint is what a snitch would do, not what a professional would do. As I said you talk to them calmly, without emotion, about the problem. But a true professional does not let a companies problem turn into a problem for them by some vindictive person who was rubbed the wrong way. Every letter written is a path for someone to get back at you.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Super bad idea, keep it verbal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore the exit interview. Want to know where to put your thoughts? Make a glassdoor post. These actually matter to companies. Exit interviews never do the outgoing employee a whit of good.

  98. I see this everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see this everywhere. as a company PR rep especially on community discussions, anything and everything you say will be twisted and bent to mean something else.

    Worst mistake of my career was to attempt engage the community as company rep. Competitors especially, but also some individuals would take everything you say and twist it, even deliberately misquote (taking what was said, change it ever so slightly to mean something else) to cause PR damage.

    Now i understand why no companies engage their customers directly in public forums.

    It does not help being in the hosting industry in a cut throat niche. Most of these attacks could be traced back to hostile competitors doing their best to manipulate public opinion using shady tactics.

  99. If He's NOT A Superior Engineer by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Superior engineer? Bad assumption. Given the context they probably are not a real engineer anyway just someone that HR calls that due to time served. Even if they are a real professional engineer then presumably so is the poster so it's peers not the massive gulf implied. If you know your shit you probably know that subset of information at around the same level or possibly better.
    Stupid alpha male office politics shit happens and there is no point trying to blame someone at the rough end of it. They were good enough to get the job so the stupid "what have I done to piss off someone more skilled" is just a ridiculous kick at a soft target.

  100. Keep asking all over the internet? by hwolfe · · Score: 1

    Keep asking the question until you find someplace or someone who will give you an answer you like? I could have sworn I saw this exact same question asked recently on workplace.se. Unfortunately, if I did, it's been deleted, as I can't find it.

  101. Document by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Document emails, circumstances and audio record anything and everything you do. If the job is worth the effort then you can endure a bit more and get enough to support yourself. I'd advise that if the 'guy' has been there that long you should just prepare quietly and move on to greener pastures. Sadly what so many don't realize is that you can do everything right and still lose.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  102. Basically, it means having an ulterior motive. by aussersterne · · Score: 0

    Going on about being a victim, or about wanting to save the world, or about anything else not because you actually care about the thing itself, but because it shows what a victim/noble person/whatever you are.

    Basically, posing. "I'm being gaslighted, do you know how bad it is?!" sounds dangerously like a pose designed to elicit a particular response.

    That's why I referenced DailyKos. I could just as easily have said Facebook. Because a workplace is not a college campus or a progressive activist event. You don't score any sympathy or nobility points just you're being "gaslighted" and woe is you and you've showed so much restraint and you are so noble and so on.

    You score points in the workplace by handling your shit and never, ever seeming to create any trouble for those above you. Going in with "I'm being gaslighted!" is 100x worse than going in with "I have a problem with employee X who is preventing me from doing my job. And I really want to do my job. Can you help?"

    That does not hold true in many places or among many crowds these days, but it does hold true in the workplace.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Basically, it means having an ulterior motive. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Going on about being a victim, or about wanting to save the world, or about anything else not because you actually care about the thing itself, but because it shows what a victim/noble person/whatever you are.

      Thank you.

      With all the "alt-right gays", "SJW" and "men's rights" weirdness I'm having trouble keeping track of the slang that is creeping in. I can't even recall hearing of "gaslighting" before August last year even if it does come from an old movie.

      I think I did have someone try shit like that on me with a long series of lies that looked like some stupid sort of trap. I ended up saying to people "X has told me this but there may be a mistake, could you please confirm it" and then even doing it right in front of the liar, asking the person next to him if what he said was really true. Eventually the lies stopped. That annoying shit happens in a lot of workplaces with idiots that want to play dominance games instead of getting stuff done.

  103. Hulk smash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carpark. Bat.

  104. This should help you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the book called Snakes in Suits by Robert Hare when you have time.

    I had to deal with this myself and after leaving I performed my own post-mortem and did quite a bit of reading on the subject.

    Gaslighting alone doesn't give us enough to work with but if your colleague is on the spectrum for Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) or Antisocial PD (ASPD), then this is an altogether different problem than just bullying.

    A previous poster wrote "The right time to hit fan with shit is the FIRST time an incident happens...and you won't stand for it." and this is probably right but not everyone is in a position where that's an option and also you may have been stalked for quite awhile before growing aware of the problem. There's also a problem with drawing a line in the sand and that is if it backfires, you'll be leaving possibly right away. I still think there's a lot of truth in this though -- you need to get on this now.

    Going to management and HR will be hit-or-miss -- if you do go, you should probably be floating your resume and trying to get interviews well in advance of this meeting. There are plenty of articles on the Internet of people who went to management and ended up being worse off than before. Figure if management does nothing or responds weakly, that tells the perp to keep going. But you don't want management to respond weakly, which means you had better be properly prepared when you bring this problem to their attention.

    Here are some other things you can do:

    1.) Get away from the guy.
    2.) Always have witnesses around and never be alone in the same room with the guy, ever.
    3.) This is very important: shore up all communication with colleagues and management. If the bully is particularly bad, his/her intention is going to be to separate you from the herd, if you will, and then get you booted. One way to prevent this is by making sure you're always speaking with the people you work with -- do not shut up or become silent because every time you speak this person gives you reason to regret it. Your silence is exactly what they want.
    3.) Know who else you can go to for information, and don't go to that person for anything ever, if you can help it.
    4.) Take notes on everything, which really sucks because this can eat up a lot of time, but you have to do this -- make sure to list your witnesses in the notes.
    5.) Don't react to the BS. This is very hard to do though and if they guy is a pro, it'll wear you out.
    6.) Start planning your departure and actively making it happen. Do not wait to do this because chances are if this person is doing this, they've detected that management is weak and/or they have reason to believe they'll get away with this behavior (and it's likely they've done this before, believe it).
    7.) Does yourco have an employee handbook (EH)? If yes, what does it say about bullying? If you don't have a copy of the EH you should try to get it (but without revealing why), or find out if it's online and print a copy of it. Your lawyer, see 8, may ask for this.
    8.) Talk with an employment lawyer about how to proceed. This is very important to do right now, while you have options available that can be used to set you up correctly so that if this does go south you've done all the right things on your end. You may not end up needing them as the problem may, in fact, get corrected, but you don't know where this is going. Also keep your mouth absolutely shut about having a lawyer until it's absolutely necessary to play that card. All the reading I've done indicates that HR is really scared about one particular thing and that's getting sued (in the US, that is).
    9.) Engage a coach that specializes in dealing with workplace bullying. Unfortunately for me, I didn't do this, nor did I follow my own advice re #8 even though I had a lawyer on the phone at one point about another matter -- by the time it got to that point for me, all I wanted to do was get the hell out of there. Now note that coaches are a dime-a-dozen -- what you want is someone

  105. Three choices. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    You have three choices.

    • 1) Quit. You won't have to put up with their shit, and you keep your sanity.
    • 2) Wait to get fired. That's their end goal. If you can't complain to your superiors and/or HR, you're going to get fired anyways.
    • 3) Be BOFH and fight back. Depending on how you try to do this, you'll end up fired, in jail, or both. It only goes well in fiction.
    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Three choices. by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Spoken like somebody never soundly beat the hell out of someone and achieved positive results.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:Three choices. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      That'd be option 3. The prosecution would call it assault and/or battery.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  106. Not sure if this is gaslighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I had a manager who would modify my code, and write comments in the code saying he didn't like how certain parts were written.

    one day he accidentally trashed our production database and just by chance I had secretly setup snapshots, and I actually saved his ass. I think he said "thanks" and that was about it.

    he was the #1 worst person i've ever worked for, and I quit not long after he started.

    1. Re:Not sure if this is gaslighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point with him "modifying the code" is he introduced bugs. Sometimes pretty severe ones. He was a shitty coder and a control freak. I had to keep separate copies of the code to restore things after he fucked them up.

  107. Open confrontation out of the question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you cannot confront him openly, maybe it is time to explore alternative means of discouraging him.

    https://www.amazon.com/15-Grizzly-Bear-Trap/dp/B00021UX68

  108. Re: Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it by Euphorinaut · · Score: 1

    Calling gaslighting slang is a bit like calling narcissism slang. Both are from works of fiction(I'll go ahead and call mythology fiction) but both have already worked their way into academia as a psychological phenomenon, regardless of whether or not one is perceived as a liberal over reacting buzzword.

  109. Its probably not just you. Unite. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Chances are its not just you he's picking on. Bullies completely rely on their victims staying silent/divided. Bullies have no defence if their victims simply unite.
    Have a quiet word with all your other colleagues and figure out who is also being victimised enough to be seriously pissed off by this guy, then figure out together what you are all going to do about it.

  110. End them. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Assholes like this usually have all kinds of dirty little secrets that they don't want out. Find it and expose it.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  111. Victimhood by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Something I regularly encounter are unproductive jack-offs who don't know shit and don't do shit. These people are as harmless as they are worthless.

    Three steps to dealing with jack-offs.

    1. Ignore them
    2. Avoid any interaction that may out anyone as being jack-offs or otherwise being seen in a bad light.
    3. Actively cover for jack-offs using broad language making it seem everyone is pulling their weight without explicitly saying so.

    I work to get shit done even if it is work someone else ought to be doing. I don't give a shit. Refuse to waste my time babysitting or trying to change people. The only thing necessary is to make sure you have/use source control so you can prove your worth in relative terms should it ever become necessary.

    One thing I will absolutely not tolerate are people actively impeding me from doing my job. If it ever happened I would immediately get in their face and demand they step off. Failing that depending on how much I care either leave or gather evidence, present to management respectfully demanding change. It's never happened and I doubt it really could. I'm way too focused on getting shit done and people who would seek to play these games are more likely than not to be intellectually lazy and therefore easily managed.

  112. Get proof by Z80a · · Score: 1

    And make it profitable to the company to sue the hell out of him.

  113. Collect evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Collect evidence in text format of what the colleague is doing wrong. This is mandatory step as humans suck at scientific research that is based on memory. From your point of view, you are right and the other is wrong. But if we would ask from the other person, that person would be right and you would be wrong. In other words, there is 50% chance that you are right and 50% chance that you are wrong. So first you need to get evidence that it is really you who are right by getting second opinions from others, e.g. from the Internet. If you skip this step you are guaranteed to be the "wrong". Also when posting questions, show some actual examples of where you disagree.

  114. HOLY FUCK.... What ever happened to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just plain ole threatening to kick his fucking ass... you bunch of pussy ass snowflake motherfuckers... for fuck sake.

    1. Re:HOLY FUCK.... What ever happened to by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Also known as the quick road to getting fired. You can't threaten someone who's hanging something more important over your head. You have to actually beat the person's ass, and be careful not to allow them to know who it was that beat their ass.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  115. Just move on. Phenomenal job market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no way to resolve the behavior; if it's ingrained in management, or most coworkers are getting away with it, your only option is to find another job. There is no way to fix/solve this type of behavior, and it's associated with narcissistic personality disorder. Run.

  116. Agree on quality by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Where I work we have a particularly nasty Gaslighting Colleague. The guy is a pain, meddles into affairs that aren't his and actually commits sabotage. However, he's backed up by one higher manager and hence can get away with anything. Only thing we can do about him is playing the formal game. It isn't a cure but it stops the symptoms and reduces the bad atmosphere at the workplace.

    Formality is all about quality and you can preemptively shut a Gaslighting Colleague with documenting agreements. Try setting up a a clean and small document to agree on quality issues (technical architecture design, class design, coding style, version control, deployment etc...) and stick to it. Sort of thank him for his contributions as quality auditor without giving him too much of a status.

    Keep him busy and hand him enough rope to hang himself. (Bitching and moaning usually is a sign of incompetence.)

    Most likely the antics won't stop and he'll go up a scale and try proving you guys are much too expensive and should be outsourced. Prepare for financial break down of the supply chain you function in.
    If you don't have any manager backing you up than the situation really gets grim and unpleasant. Try as long as you can to not let the bastards ruin a good thing; Surrendering to any kind of competition is hardly ever a strategic solution. As a last resource look for alternative jobs.

    You'd think organisations would detect any kind of behaviour that screws up their strategic position. But most of them don't. Some brown nosing career jockeys will use anything to gain a minimal raise in salary or position.
    (The "sane" ones in organisation should come up with a way to unite. But how do you distinguish the "sane" ones?)

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  117. confidence doesn't come from nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he is not as competent as he is considered, he must feel that way because of the personal connections that he has developed. He is trying to move up. Either enable him and ride on his coat tails (because he is playing politics and might get somewhere), or figure out whose support he relies on and confront them about the fact that they are enabling a destructive person out of personal loyalty. It may go your or it may not. If you think that it may not, have an exit strategy because you'll need it.

  118. outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just find him outside of office and scare him, if he didn't stop just pay to neighborhood boys to smack him a little, maybe than his brain will come back

  119. Performance reviews by eyenot · · Score: 1

    Get performance reviews from as many people as you can. If his looks different than everyone else's, fucking hang him.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  120. Beat his ass by eyenot · · Score: 1

    Oh and if that doesn't work, stalk him down and beat his fucking ass with a baseball bat somewhere dark. Punch him hard in the eye for me when you're done.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  121. Females by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Females are natural-born gaslighters. You should consider the possibility that one or more accusatory females might be behind the gaslighting colleague. If that's the case, the gaslighting will follow you wherever you go. You'll need to surreptitiously relocate to another country & change your identity. Plastic surgery to change your appearance might also be necessary.

  122. Re: Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes, I know, and pasties are little bits hiding things on strippers that people pay to see even though they don't even strip and not just the dictionary definition of it being a flaky pastry snack.
    Of course it's slang. Just because you guys don't speak English doesn't mean that people who do can pick up on your movie derived slang automatically.

  123. Advice from the great Weasel Kami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Defend your territory, human. Rake this lesser male with your claws and baste yourself in his blood. Devour his young and mate with his females in the disputed territory. Raise many offspring, mark the area with your scent glands, and relish your victory."
    http://www.happletea.com/comic/spiritual-guidance/

  124. Gaslighting as a management tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I experienced gaslighting once, but the colleague didn't want to do this. He was ordered to do so and had no other choice. I didn't deal with him. If management creates problems to solve others, just quit without notice. You should leave a year before you realize this and keep your mouth shut.

  125. Just quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been through similar with a halfass automotive supplier where I worked as factory IT.

    Every single support call I got from production was hysterical screaming and that sometime included threats. A line worker on their line would unplug a barcode scanner and they'd scream over the two-way radio: "IT GET HERE RIGHT NOOOOOW RIGHT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW" and the plant manager once mentioned to me that he 'might have to go to his truck to get his gun' when I told him to ask his people to stop doing silly shit like breaking IT equipment. He informed me that it was strictly IT's problem if Cindy the Line Worker attacked an industrial PC with a torque tool.

    I had worked there for 4 years and still wasn't allowed to take vacation days. The one time they signed off on my vacation request (for 2 months in advance) they waited until a few days prior to rush up to me and tell me that they 'canceled' the request after initially approving it. In 4 years I had never missed a day, never took a personal day, never took a sick day, never been late, never left early and spent something like a combined 40 Saturdays + Sundays a year in the factory on top of a 5x10 weekday schedule.

    Eventually I just couldn't take the long hours of screaming and bullshit and put in my notice. My manager didn't hire a replacement until the very last day of my notice period. My personal phone went absolutely nuts with calls from that place starting the very first day I was no longer working for that shithole company.

    Nothing you ever try to do will improve your situation in these types of workplaces. They've devolved into nightmares due malfeasant management, high turnover in skilled positions and the general permanent-crisis mode atmosphere that develops. The only thing that works is to remove yourself from the situation and quit. Talking to HR got me nowhere (it actually harmed me as my manager casually informed me that my name was taken out of consideration for promotions and lateral movements).

  126. Respectfully disagree. Quitting is not enough. by Larsen+E+Whipsnade · · Score: 2

    The entire software development industry is rife with this sort of thing. Why? Because we're not doing what it takes to fix the problem.

    If you just up and leave, all you've earned is a reprieve. You'll run into it all over again somewhere else. You need to punish the gaslighters and their enablers, or else nothing will change.

    First, document everything. Every damn thing. Be prepared to prove things to any available objective third party you might happen across. Then, get a lawyer. Then, and only then... line up your next job.

    Use your documentation to cause as much pain and embarrassment as possible as you go out the door. Burn the place down. Cause them legal problems if you can. Mess with their politics. Learn who hates whom and turn them against each other. Cause the worst offenders to lose face. If it's publicly traded, cause investor relations problems.

    You owe it to the world to destroy these bastards. No mercy.

  127. Just make sure it's really intentional, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I'd add poring over every source-code commit, and then criticizing it even if the criticism is contradictory to what he previously said.

    That makes me feel bad. I do look at every commit (though rarely more than a few seconds), simply because I feel it is a good way to have communication, spot stupid mistakes early (everyone does those), learn about the code and teach people about frameworks that we already have (too many unfortunately for most to remember there might already be a function to do what they want).
    And yes, sometimes I end up writing things that contradict what I said earlier. Mostly because sometimes, the solution I preferred actually ended up being worse.
    Nowadays I try to mitigate it by using the "praise publicly, critizise in private" rule, but that conflicts with the cases where the whole team might benefit from being included in the discussion.
    So I at least appreciate anyone considering that some of these people might just try to do their best at being a senior engineer but have their faults. I always find it very hard to figure out where the sweet spot between "micromanaging" and "leaving them stranded" is for a new colleague straight from university.

  128. Re: Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it by Euphorinaut · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I'm a little worried now that I've struck some sort of oddly specific nerve, so I want to emphasize to you that this was not my intention. The difference between pasties and gaslighting in this context that qualifies pasties as slang but not gaslighting is that pasties have not become recognized jargon in the curriculum of any specific field of study. You could be right in saying "instances of bullying is better than using the slang term "gaslighting" even if it fits better for people who know that slang." in the sense that sometimes it's better to omit jargon when you consider the audience, but I make a point to distinguish one from the other in this context because it seems that this trend of seeing it as a niche cultural terminology frequently becomes another anti-intellectual not to learn a definition even when it fits most accurately(for some people).

  129. This almost - but not quite - makes sense, by Larsen+E+Whipsnade · · Score: 2

    The trouble is, the system rewards the incompetent. The skills needed to do a good job are not at all the same skills that are needed to get and keep a good job. Just look at Congress. Most of those clowns have been there for years.

    I'll shut up and learn from anyone with a proven track record of technical success. I won't trust anyone with a lengthy, proven track record of failure. I'm very much in the minority that way.

  130. I was gaslighted at work by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    by my manager. After getting my morale seriously pummelled for several months, I sent the CTO of our organization git blame logs that showing I was being beaten up for trivial things that my manager's most senior reports had in fact taught me to do and that they had coded and shipped out to clients on other projects my manager was overseeIng.

    Needless to say...I was shown the door a few months later. This would have happened anyways, but at least by confronting the gaslighter with hard evidence I can look at myself in the mirror and I'm not the emotional wreck I'd be if I sat back and did nothing. I don't regret it in the least.

    And just maybe I made small dent in that jerk's ability to gaslight others in the future.

  131. That is easy by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I wait behind the corner of a hallway, short club and some cloth to stuff into his mouth ready.
    He gets a short smack on the neck. Cloth into the mouth in case the smack was to soft.
    Then I drag him into the basement, along the coworkers who pretend not noticing us.
    There he gets chained to the wall, a tape over his mouth, the cloth stays where it is.
    Obviously he has no need for water and bread ...

    After closing the door I tape the lock and the edges, to avoid his smell getting out to early.

    Perhaps he never gets found ...shit happens!

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  132. You're fucked by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Raising things through the official channels is out of the question

    Get out now.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  133. the correct solutions are the easiest.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    murder him. ideally not at work. somewhere nice and quiet where you can take your time and really enjoy it.

  134. undermining. sabotaging. not gaslighting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what kind of an ignorant fuck are you anyway?

  135. Remain calm! Plan and organise your exit. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Others have said it and I would second that: Plan and organise your exit.

    Don't appease, don't confront but don't back down from a fight or discussion. Look for a new job and do your thing as long as you need to or can in the current company. Then quit professionally. If someone asks you why, state that element in the culture don't seem to fit. If someone gets specific in their questions, stay objective and calm while describing the situation that lead you to quit.

    Unless they sincerely offer to address the problem head on and offer you to stay on your terms (different department, different supervisor, different tasks, no direct interaction with the a**hole, etc.) don't back down from your move.

    I've come to think that gaslighting is a cruel way of social interaction, grown with human evolution.
    The people doing it are basically type-a sociapaths towards their victims. It's basically a mechanism of tribe-formation. The old testament and the abrahamic revelation cults much of our western culture is built on are full of this shit. An extended form of it being - of course - modern day fascism.

    I read a lot about it lately. I had a strange experience this last half year with a supposed GF of mine and stayed in the 'relationship' just to observe the extreme mechanisms of semi-borderline reality distortion and manipulation she pulled off. I dumped her (the first time I seriously dumped anyone like this) and caught her off guard (she was shocked) but it's interesting that our "relationship" hasn't changed at all, the still behaves like an a**hole towards me, only less so because we don't interact that much anymore.

    Social interaction phenomenon like this you should basically take as a more-or-less objective force of nature, and deal with it accordingly. No job in the world is worth putting up with something that challenges your basic inner self each and every step and has you prove your worth as a human every step of the way and has you doubt your self-worth.

    You're better of being a bum or a digital nomand than putting up with a job like that.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  136. It's from an old movie, but it's become a buzzword by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    on the left. It is a way of saying "I am a victim of abuse" without actually claiming explicitly to be a victim of abuse. With the younger crowd, it's seen as something that men do to women, typically, and is used a lot in feminist circles. By saying "I am being gaslighted!" the goal is to elicit the sympathy and understanding that come from abuse claims without having to justify the notion that you are being abused. You go straight to "Oh you poor thing! You are so strong and patient!" without having to cross the "So tell me what's going on" part of the conversation.

    It's not something I would try on a boss. Your approach is the right one. "So-and-so is impeding my work. They're moving my files, changing my appointments, spreading rumors that are harming my necessary work relationships, and generally making work impossible. I need it to stop so that I can continue to be effective. I've been unable to stop it. I need you to support increased separation between myself and them, as I'm finding it difficult to work when I have to interact with them multiple times over the course of a day."

    It's not perfect, but it's better than going in with an indirect claim of abuse, hoping that your boss will understand what you're asking for.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  137. Man up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chances are there's room for improvement on both sides. If you're being micromanaged you probably haven't shown that you can deliver good quality work, independently and on-time.

    Rockstar engineers normally have better things to do than to engage in office politics and micromanagement...if that's the case take a look in the mirror first and ask whether you'd be willing to pay someone your salary for the quality/speed of work you produce and whether your colleague is simply frustrated with your contributions.

    Oh, and poring over every commit is a good thing ... your colleague clearly cares about the product you are producing.

  138. How to Hug a Porcupine by Tora · · Score: 1

    I assume that leaving is out of the question. That means you must address it internally. Read this book. It talks about how to deal with difficult toxic people.

    --
    tora
    1. Re:How to Hug a Porcupine by Tora · · Score: 1

      Sorry looks like multiple titles involved. here is the link. https://www.amazon.com/How-Hug.... Gaslighting is a common behavior of borderline personality disorder and victim type people. It is challenging but doable to live with this type of personality. The book is great at explaining it.

      --
      tora
  139. No, it's not ignorant. by aussersterne · · Score: 2

    I've spent a lifetime on the left and I'm seeing a lot of young people that have never had to do anything hard claiming that to do anything hard is either (a) mentally abusive, (b) impossible, or (c) unjustified and unfair.

    Older generations went thousands of miles overseas to engage in trench warfare. Older feminists scored women's rights without having patron saints above them that would protect them from harassment. This idea that you're incapable of doing anything hard because prejudice, because anger, because abuse, etc. is bullshit. Sorry, it is.

    You grow a backbone by growing a backbone. It is hard. It is scary. You may be beaten down. You may have had your ego destroyed. Oh well. There is still a moment at which you have to stand up and be counted, or face the consequences. Life is hard, get a helmet.

    People left abusive situations in their home and married lives for thousands of years before you heard about "gaslighting." It was hard. It was scary. They were beaten down.

    You may well want to make it easier for them, and that could in some ways be laudable, but the fact is that it is nonsense to claim that it can't be done or it wasn't ever done, and the last thing that's going to work in most workplaces (nor should we necessarily want it to) is to go in and claim that you are the victim of such catastrophic-marriage-style-abuse that you can't mentally function any longer. Your boss is not going to want someone who has literally become unable to function due to the nonphysical, merely "head games" actions of a fellow, non-position-of-authority co-worker.

    This is the workplace. It's not your home life. Your "abuser" is just another schmo with a job three desks over. They are not your spouse, your abusive parent, etc. You are basically going in with an admission that you are socially stunted, emotionally vulnerable, etc. Even if your boss tries to be noble about it themselves, he/she is going to have a particular impression of you as an employee that precludes giving you future responsibilities or promoting you when the time comes because the risk/reward proposition for the company does not safely include giving a person who can be "gaslighted" at work any more responsibilities.

    I'm not saying that the questioner shouldn't take this up the chain. Note my original comment. I'm saying that they shouldn't claim the language of domestic abuse to do it. They should state what is happening and state that it is affecting their world. Period. It's bad advice to suggest that they do anything but avoid "gaslighting" that language entirely, unless they are positive that their boss is a progressive-left-leaning SJW who is an anti-domestic-abuse activist in their off hours.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:No, it's not ignorant. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly the ignorance I was talking about. You do not grow a backbone by getting up after you have been beaten down. Doing that already requires that you have the ego to do that. In case your ego is limited or non existent then you will not fight. All your examples of the brave people in the last century are rubbish, as they went there knowing they have to face evil otherwise there will be no USA anymore. However, even in those times people were pushed around and send to do things they did not want, but they did not see a way out of it.

      Anyway, you are right in the assumption that it is not helpful to go through official channels claiming abuse. It seldom works for women and I am not aware that it worked for men. Therefore, there are only two main options fight or run. Whereas I would prefer to establish an exit strategy. Therefore, loosing is not an option.

      In addition, usually people do not know that they be gaslightened (if that is the word). As other already stated this might be more a case of bullying where collecting evidence is not that relevant. And with bullies you often only need to punch their noses.

  140. This. Libel need not be public, but must be untrue by raymorris · · Score: 1

    This post is absolutely correct. In defamation law, the word "publish" is explicitly b defined as "communicate to another person" and it absolutely CAN be just one other person. It's been held that insulting someone, saying something to the target and only them, isn't libel or slander, it has to be communicated to at least one other person.

    In the US at least, truth is an absolute defense to a defamation claim. So you are safe if you stick to true statements and hold on to some form of documentation (you only have to prove truth by "most likely", not "beyond av reasonable doubt).

    As someone else pointed out, you are also safe from a libel or slander claim if you say "I'm leaving because of Joe Shmoe", without giving a specifics.

    A safe, yet specific combination would be to separate the logs you save but not create, such as CVS histories, log files, etc, and say "I'm leaving due to Joe's actions. I put logs are on this flash drive for you." (But be sure you haven't put anything you're not supposed to acccess on the drive.)

    Opinion is also safe, and facts can be magically turned into opinion with words like "I think" in written communication. "Joe's a vindictive asshole and I can't tolerate his abuse anymore" is probably non-actionable opinion. Probably, "based on these logs, I believe Joe sabotaged project X" is likely not actionable, unless he can't prove you don't really believe that - the statement of fact is "I believe". Only use "based on ... I believe" qualifiers in writing so someone testifying doesn't forget you included the "I believe" qualifier.

  141. Have you considered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered he's right and you're wrong? Maybe you're just incompetent. Don't worry, most programmers are. Programming is hard. It sounds like you're still in the denial stage. Don't worry; this too shall pass.

  142. Man up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man up.

  143. a dinner evening. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best bet would be to invite this gaslighter over for dinner, and let him experience "it"s hip to be square" from huey lewis , "american psycho" style.

  144. Become friends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since he is a "star" engineer and going above his head is not possible:

    Try to get on his good side. He obviously feel threatened but if you show him honestly that you appreciate his opinion and skill and respect him then he will likely become milder / friendlier. Basically show him that you can be a good colleague to work with. He knows he has to work with someone.

    If you have something that MIGHT make him look bad, go to him and discuss it with him first, ask his opinion and accept it and don't think about it (i.e. but i know my way IS better, etc, just accept and forget about it). If it causes confrontation and finds no acceptance. then it's not a better way, even if it could have been on technical grounds. If you ask him where to put files because you keep "loosing" them, what to do, etc, and do so honestly and with respect then he will likely show some respect and basic human decency to you as well.

    If all that sounds impossible then just look for something else. When you quit, don't try to blame him, it will just leave a negative associations and in professional fields you likely always meet again. It's best to minimize negative baggage and just cut your losses. Don't burn bridges. The company might be a client of a future employer, etc. In general, don't dwell on bad things. Look for the good, forget the rest.

  145. nominate him/her to the republican party! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EOM

  146. lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While truth is an absolute defense, it does not come with a large bank account with which to pay your attorney to defend you against a libel/slander lawsuit.

    Say nothing, and walk out the door.

  147. Gaslighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gaslighter = sociopath.

  148. Sugar, Not Vinegar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, bitterness may feel helpful.

    But a pound of sugar in his gas tank, caramelising in his engine block, so he can't come in anymore, works even better.

    I am, of course, joking.

  149. Alternate Perspectives by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    It would be difficult to give any advice on your situation without knowing the full story.

    What I am going to say will be wildly unpopular, but realities often are.

    If you are a hard worker who is just being harassed by one or more coworkers and you are unable to bring it up to the company, then I would follow the majority advice given here and begin your search to seek employment elsewhere.

    However !

    There are some employees whose work ethic / abilities are horrific. One who places a burden on the rest of their coworkers due to the inability to get a job done on time, correctly, or even at all. One who, due to certain circumstances*, cannot or will not be let go from the company. In this type of situation, when management is unwilling to step in and do what's necessary, your coworkers most certainly will attempt to coerce you into voluntarily leaving.

    *Related to company management, Union Member, part of a diversity quota, or a self-preservation issue at the management level due to headcount concerns.

    Consider also the possibility that management has directed their top performers to help keep an eye on folks who may not be performing up to expectations because their own schedule of conference calls,job duties and even technical expertise doesn't allow them to do it themselves.

    I can offer this perspective because the group I work with is in a situation such as this.

    We have at least one employee who, after being with us for a few years, is still incapable of performing day to day tasks without having to ask for help from everyone else. They are unreliable and, without constant supervision ( micromanagement to many ), would happily sit at their desk and play on their phone all day long. As a result, most of the rest of the group will have nothing to do with them because their inability or unwillingness to do the job just means more work for everyone else.

    So from their perspective, the rest of the team is just being mean. When, in reality, we're quite tired of having to do their work on top of our own.

    I can no longer justify utilizing my own time helping them if they're unwilling to learn or even try. We've tried, time and time again to no avail. So we've given up.
    If that's considered unprofessional or mean, so be it.

    I have a job to do.

    I don't have time to be nice anymore.

  150. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just tell them to fuck off. Don't be a beta.

  151. Some thoughts on defective people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bear in mind that I in no way advocate resolving your issues with defective people by resorting to violence no matter how incredibly satisfying. The only appropriate time EVER for violence is when defending ones self against violence. Without a better account its hard to say if they are a bully or a sociopath or what so I am simply going to refer to them as defective. Also any reference to violence is entirely figurative. That said I would suggest consideration of the following maxims and my interpretation of how they might apply to the OP's situation:

    Maxim 6: If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
    Maxim 27: Don’t be afraid to be the first to resort to violence.

    In many instances the defining moment where a defective person chooses to target someone is when they establish that person can be targeted without consequence. This WILL occur through the use of probing attacks. Not responding to those attacks establishes you as a safe target for them to go after.

    Maxim 9: Never turn your back on an enemy.

    People like this plot bullshit in their free time. So do whatever you can to make sure they are under constant observation under the guise of regular unwanted attention from other co-workers, supervisors, etc.

    Maxim 12: A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head.

    Once you've been established as a safe target for them you have to deal with them in secret. They cannot know whats coming.

    Maxim 19: The world is richer when you turn enemies into friends, but that’s not the same as you being richer.

    Its great to think that you could somehow bring a defective person over to your side. But its not once ever going to happen. Trying to do so will only be to your detriment.

    Maxim 20: If you’re not willing to shell your own position, you’re not willing to win.

    Its extremely likely that getting rid of the defective person will have a negative impact on you. But if youre unwilling to take that consequence your going to be stuck.

    Maxim 30: A little trust goes a long way. The less you use, the further you’ll go.

    These thing happen when you give someone (supervisor/coworker) too much trust before you establish who that person is and/or they earn that trust. You might think your a 'good judge of character' but you absolutely are not. Otherwise you would not be in this situation.

    Maxim 41: “Do you have a backup?” means “I can’t fix this.”

    Supervisors typically don't create work product. Co'workers do. If you have a Co-worker tampering with your work product to the point that you cant fix it you better have your own private backups.

    Maxim 47: Don’t expect the enemy to cooperate in the creation of your dream engagement.

    You might be building a case against your defective person or some such nonsense but all people are creatures of habit. Literally the human brain is a highly advanced pattern detection/pattern iteration meat computer. Odds are this person has pulled this shit before and gotten away with it. They may assume that someone will attempt to trip them up and take countermeasures.

    Maxim 59: Two wrongs is probably not going to be enough.

    Either the defective persons supervisor doesn't know whats going on. OR they do and they dont care. If you chose to win rather than leave you may need to get rid of more than one defective person.

    Maxim 61: Don’t bring big grenades into small rooms.

    Once or If you finally have your smoking gun. This is not the time for a small closed door meeting with someone. Think big how can this embarass company brass big-time. Frequently big companies cover shit up. But disposing of a tiny toy poodle shit is a easy compared to a pile of elephant shit.

    Maxim 65: After the toss, be the one with the pin, not the one with the grenade.
    Maxim 68: Negotiating from a position of strength does not mean you shouldn’t also negotia

  152. Re: This. Libel need not be public, but must be un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great advice Ray.

  153. Au contraire, by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    that is exactly what you do. That is what I did, and that is what others must do.

    The ignorance is yours, and is typical of the "progressive" left right now.

    There is only one way out, and that is to take the way out. All the rest is bullshit.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  154. Re: Terrible advice by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

    For someone who asks nerds for advice, this is terrible. Growing a backbone isn't something you get right the first time, guaranteed. So you make noise, and give someone an opportunity to fire you. Given the slightly incredible environment, with no official channels available, firing is the likely outcome.

    You could land another job, give notice, then spend two weeks verbally detailing your reasons for leaving. But I agree that the exit interview is the only real opportunity to make your case.

    In a different environment, grow a spine would work, but not here.

  155. Re:This. Libel need not be public, but must be unt by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Record yourself telling the HR drone you are recording the exit interview then record the rest of the interview.

    Otherwise what you said will be distorted beyond recognition.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  156. simple. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Drag him out in the carpark and give him a good kicking like you know you want to.

  157. Every day by krray · · Score: 1

    Four flat tires. Cut the stems off.

  158. heat by guygo · · Score: 1

    Pour gasoline on their desk and light it. I bet that will get the attention of management.

  159. Sever. by limaCAT76 · · Score: 1

    The sooner you can leave, the least damage to your career at other places the idiot can do.

  160. Gaslighting Colleague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happened to me and I arranged a meeting with HR and my boss. I knew I was done there when the gas lighter came up to me afterwards and wanted to talk. Some one had leaked my meeting with HR. The sad part is that I became a target because I stuck up for my boss. I waited until my contract ran out and left for greener pastures. I see that my former boss has changed jobs recently and I bet it's because all his supporters were driven away by the gas lighter. I had always been an award winning employee in my past and now current job. I feel sorry for those who have no frame of reference to know what a good and productive environment looks like.

  161. Document Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I mean everything. Make sure HR knows what you are doing; if You get pushback, let Them know You will go to the EEOC if needed.

  162. Very excellent advice by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If you are going to leave, and plan to have something like an exit interview, make sure to record the whole thing. That can head off a lot of problems later if someone claims you said something you did not. Check for legality of letting people know they are being recorded though. If they must be informed keep a sign on your desk saying that the room is under surveillance to protect property.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  163. Make your own by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I've had exit interviews at some places, but not all of them.

    However I've always had a final chat with someone at the company as to why I was leaving. Lots of times it's simply better opportunity, but there's always something that makes you think of looking, and it's a kindness to let them know what they might do better. If they are not having an exit interview you can ask to speak to someone yourself, or range to have lunch sometime after you leave. even if there's nothing you could really say to help them out (some places are behind help) it's nice to at least tell someone what you enjoyed about working at a place.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  164. Re:This. Libel need not be public, but must be unt by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    It's amazing to me how many people don't get the difference between stating an opinion and stating something as fact. I am thinking of a certain Slashdot frequenter who fits that profile.

    There is a great deal of legal precedent in that regard. For example, calling someone "an ass" or similar is pretty definitely an opinion, even if it's stated as though it were fact: "You're an ass."

    In college law classes there is a rather famous case study from, I think, the 17th century.

    A guest at an inn told the innkeeper: "My horse can pisse better ale than you serve here."

    The innkeeper sued the customer for slander. The judge ruled: "The accused did not slander the innkeeper. He complimented his horse."

    So, while there are lines as to what is acceptable speech and what is not, it pays to be cognizant of where those lines are. And many people have no clue.

  165. same here by j_l_larson · · Score: 1

    I have this same situation where I work. The reason for the gaslighting obviously is that the ahole *wants* me to quit. That is the whole point. So everyone here saying "Quit! Quit!" is just playing into the hopes of the gaslighter. However, finding a job is not so easy anymore, so just giving up because it sucks is not entirely an option. Especially since it tends to happen at every job. (I am a female engineer). What I find works best is just stick to your guns as best you can, diplomatically and logically (What would Spock do?), but since he is in a superior position (lead engineer), I frequently have to 'Disagree but Commit' in the interest of getting things done. If he truly is an ahole - it's not happening only to you. In my case, the ahole has made enemies of all the other teams and departments we interact with. He's a moron who is driving us over a cliff, IMO, but I gotta make a living. I point out the errors in the plans he makes, he pretends he didn't hear or can't understand the reasoning. Eventually I will quit, probably after I hit the two year mark (6 months to go) and then go to another job where another ahole awaits. Or maybe, maybe there is a job with no aholes. I pray for this my entire life, hasn't happened yet. Best of luck.

    1. Re:same here by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Especially since it tends to happen at every job.

      I obviously have not personally experienced each situation. But, for your own benefit, please consider that you are the only common factor between all these jobs. So chances are, you are either choosing rotten jobs, allowing unhealthy dynamics to be established once you are there, or misinterpreting what is happening.

      (I am a female engineer).

      I would buy that for one or two jobs out of five. If all five turned out badly, this is almost certainly not the main factor. Furthermore, it's one thing that you can do nothing to change, so it's best to focus efforts elsewhere.

      I frequently have to 'Disagree but Commit' in the interest of getting things done

      That's a perfectly expected and normal occurrence in a hierarchical organization and treating it as an outrage is guaranteed to spoil working relationship with a tech lead. Everyone has a job description, even if someone can hypothetically do that job better, or think they can.

    2. Re:same here by j_l_larson · · Score: 1

      You are a hater here to do some hating - focusing only on negatives. If it's not your problem, why not bugger off? I think you should

    3. Re: same here by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Ok, we now have a good understanding concerning the causes of your troubles at work.

  166. This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the job interview is more about YOU interviewing the employer. Once you've had a job like this you'll get a feel for that kind of environment and will generally be able pick it out during the interview. Then you simply avoid the jobs with toxic environments.

  167. Re: Oh, and one MORE thing. I came back to post it by dbIII · · Score: 1

    OK then - jargon and not slang.
    I was not aware that it was technical jargon derived from popular culture instead of slang derived from popular culture, and all I have to tell me that is your word (but I do believe you).

    Either way is a barrier to communication when used to communicate with people who are not familiar with that jargon or slang unless the definition is conveyed early in the communication.

  168. You don't get it. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    You still do not understand what I am saying. To do what you propose requires ego. If your will is destructed you cannot perform what you request. There is also enough scientific evidence that people under certain conditions are unable to fight. What you had in your past was someone helping you to develop an ego or you are a natural talent. This is similar to people from a "bad neighborhood" many of them end up being criminals and some of them are able to escape these conditions. However, you are obviously not able to put yourselves in the shoes of someone who lacks ego. Furthermore, you assume people behave logically. They do not. How else could I be so stubborn?

    BTW: What has that to do with the left (what ever that is?).

    1. Re:You don't get it. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      Of course I understand what you are saying. And of course it comes from the left.

      Listen, I have a social science Ph.D. and have fought battles in this area. Just because something is published research doesn't mean that it's settled fact. Most of the body of research to which you are referring concerns custodial situations with ongoing physical abuse, or at the loosest, domestic co-habitation with the ongoing threat of physical abuse, and even then the findings are hotly contested, many of them having come out of the very ideologically driven (and, to my eye, nonsensical) unholy alliance between gender studies and a parts of post-theraputic psychology.

      It is nowhere near having achieved consensus and the battles are pitched, primarily political battles inside the academy and in the journals. That of course doesn't stop the press from reporting on them, or more pointedly, the left from adopting them.

      But point 1) the literature that you cite does not correspond to the situation that you site at all. Custodial/cohabitative threat-of-violence, most severe cases leading to psychological "trauma" that renders the subject unable to function vs. workplace hijinks and bad co-workers.

      UNLESS you are suggesting (and here is where the left comes in) that workplace hijinks and bad co-workers == a most severe case of abuse leading to psychological trauma with all of the (hotly contested) psychological consequences that this implies, in which case:

      Point 2) this is left activism run amok and is of the general form of many other "slippages" on the progressive left:

      Donald Trump ~= Racist ~= KKK ~= Nazi Party Member in 1940, ergo Donald Trump == Nazi Party Member in 1940, ergo Trump Voter = Genocidal War Criminal
      Classroom Topics ~= Uncomfortable ~= Triggering ~= Abusive ~= Violent, ergo Classroom Topics == Violent and Abusive and requiring federal intervention
      and so on.

      In this case, it is:

      Co-worker violates norms ~= Co-worker is gaslighting ~= Co-worker is abusive ~= Co-worker is an abuser leading you to severe psychological harm,
      ergo Employee is the victim of several psychological trauma rendering them dysfunctional to the point that the literature on extended intensive abuse must be cited

      (Nevermind that they still have enough agency to post a whine to Slashdot)

      And I am saying that any employer that sees the claim that the workplace is so incredibly abusive that a person has experienced complete, agency-neutering ego-destruction, rendering them unable to function or take initiative, is going to look for five minutes around them, walk to the water cooler and back, and then decide that this employee is a snowflake, can't hack it, and needs to be let go.

      Or, the simpler claim, which is the one I made before: It's bullshit here, and that literature has nothing to do at all with this case, or indeed most any case, even most domestic abuse/violence situations (and again, even those have contested operational definitions and vary from project to project in the research), which do not rise to the level of the circumstances that you describe.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    2. Re:You don't get it. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      You are mixing things up. First, it has already been pointed out by others in this forum that the original author describes something which can be better described as bullying, which is in fact something different than usually described by gaslighting. Bullying can lead to psychological harm too, but usually you are aware of being bullied. Second, we are discussing what to do in an environment where you feel to be manipulated and your ego is suppressed or gone, and the person feeling that feels disoriented. And in that case seeking help is usually the best thing to do in conjunction with leaving the the "toxic" environment. Third, with your rant about "Donald Trump" etc. you are definitely leaving the topic we discussed before. It looks like you want to talk about something completely different. You can do so, but it has nothing to do with anything I posted before.

      BTW: Donald Trump made racist comments and he also categorized people by their value which are two common characteristics of fascism. Also he is authoritarian including his believe in a strong leader (which is obviously him). That is another common trade of fascism. However, you are right about:
      "Classroom Topics ~= Uncomfortable ~= Triggering ~= Abusive ~= Violent, ergo Classroom Topics == Violent and Abusive and requiring federal intervention
      and so on." This is typical bullshit of people who did not grow up, but are at university. This comes often together with "Why should I know that? I passed that exam last semester/year."

    3. Re:You don't get it. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      Because you said "can better be described as bullying."

      That is false. That is on the order of the same lineages I traced.

      Impolite behavior / poor norms ~= aggressive behavior ~= bullying ~= abusive behavior ~= gaslighting (abuse)

      It can not be described as bullying at all, and so none of what you cited matters in the least. If his co-worker(s) had hit him, hazed him by stealing his pants and forcing him to walk around the office naked, etc., that is bullying.

      Changing appointments on a calendar, micromanaging, etc. is categorically NOT bullying. It is normal office politics, and the questioner needs not a shrink to feel sorry for how abused he is, but to do something about it.

      And as I said before, if he goes to his boss claiming that this is "bullying" rather than saying that office politics are impeding his work and this person needs to stop, then he is putting himself in a position to get fired, because that is what happens in offices. I'd fire him on the spot if he came to me and said he was being "gaslighted" and then came out with those details.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  169. My ex-supervisor, many years ago tried this... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    Then one day, he made the mistake of asking me to fudge a time card on a Government contract. He is now history, canned quickly, and unemployable on anything Government at this point.

    You can irritate your underlings, you can abuse your power in a small company, but in a slightly larger one with Government contracts don't even get caught breaking the law. Not sure if this helps, but there are some things you just can't talk your way out of with upper management. Being a superstar just won't save you when you royally screw up.

    Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. I wonder how that happened?

  170. Wait outside the parking lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait for him with a baseball bat as he's going to his car. Wear a hoodie/mask. Go to town on his knees

    Send an anonymous email from an anonymous account used from a public computer/proxy. "People are watching you at work".

    That attitude adjustment should pretty much take care of it

  171. Obligitory ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Nuke them from orbit.

    It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  172. Break the rules. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't want to leave, find him outside work and give them a good scare. Don't get arrested, but you can always put the fear in someone by obfuscated channels. If you're already about to depart, make the guy afraid for their kneecaps.

  173. Re:This. Libel need not be public, but must be unt by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Calling me an ass could be factually correct. For example I'm a mule, which makes me half-ass. (male donkey + female horse)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  174. Simple way to stop gas lighting by Bratch · · Score: 1

    Take away his lighter and/or ask him to stop eating so much beans.

    --
    Beware of the Redittor who loans you a Sharpie.
  175. Not leave but be prepared to leave by b783719 · · Score: 1

    First thing you should be doing is to put AWAY all your emotional reaction. You need a clear mind to think. The next part is where you really start. Start and think in terms of your economic opportunity.

    You need to think the following economic risk benefit analysis. Is(Are) the colleague(s) action(s) resulting in an increase in risk in your economic opportunity (ex: affecting your earning/salary)? And then, does the increase in risk also negatively affect the company profit (your productivity => profit)? If yes, now you have a stand that the company cares and you can start to think whether or not to report (if no, no point in reporting). The clear the negatively effect on company profit, the better the stand. (Think like a kid. When your older bro point finger at you for minor things like eating all the cookies when you didn't. You instead tell mother and prove that he used her wallet for shopping. Since she is very likely to care about her wallet and your bro can't back up his claims, it is an advantage for you.)

    Finalize the potential risk of reporting it including no changes with backfire and the potential benefit of reporting with new changes. If the benefit greater than risk, you should report it to higher ups.

    It's like the art of war, you counter when you have an advantage. Regardless of he being a superstar, you strike when you have an advantage. That advantage can be a record of anything that gives you the advantage. If you don't have a advantage, it is clearly not your best interest to counter (report) it. In that case, you should just leave and let itself rot. Also, you should NEVER need to confront the colleague doing it, it feels good but you're not doing it because you have an advantage which means NOTHING will change.

  176. I experienced this recently at Google. by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    My last manager at Google was a gaslighter par excellence. I filed an HR complaint, but he was a director, so they sided with him. He threatened me with a performance improvement plan in order to hold my feet to the flames to force me out of the company (my performance was great). So I quit. Sometimes you literally have no power to fix these sorts of situations. Companies that tolerate (and even protect) these types of behaviors put themselves on a self-harming trajectory.

  177. Fail fast by iamacat · · Score: 1

    A dozen things have to go right for a job to contribute to rise of your career, only one has to go wrong for it to become a personal and professional disaster. Like in Poker, you have to quickly fold most hands till you are dealt a very good one.

    That said, you may be misreading the situation. So long as you are not too worried about bring to find another job with decent pay, this person has much more to lose than you. Starting to forward any obviously unreasonable/contradictory communication to manager/tech lead could be a great way to make them back off.