I just searched for some sweet cougar action, and google was happy to advertise appropriately.
CougarLife.com, however, comes up a fair amount in spam, and isn't advertised.
I've seen a lot of spam for these kinds of site, so there may be a valid reason for closely examining them, but if this is an editorial decision, it's repulsive.
Not necesarily - it "actively developing" or even "producing" could include sale as a package of the patent.
But I don't understand why broad patents would be useless. Surely, the broader the better.
I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...
The ability to read in sunlight is the one thing keeping me tied to either p-books or my crappy eReader.
But the Mini 5 doesn't have an exceptionally high resolution, and has some weird 30 pin adapter. What about it do you find appealing? The size of the on-screen keyboard?
I believe that Google should spare no expense in SOLID build quality.
Even if it's expensive, a high-resolution, magnesium-cased, tough, PADD-style device would make Android the platform with clearly the BEST tablet device.
Put the best of everything into it; cameras, good speakers. Enough to mesmerize the tech journalists.
Other, more reasonable, price-points would benefit from being in that market.
I've installed Ubuntu on a number of friends' computers, at their request. The main reason they like it is that it's not the store-brand poor man's alternative, as Yahoo is to Google.
Letting them see me switching from Yahoo to Google would just look retarded. Like Ubuntu couldn't afford Google, but had the next best thing.
Slashdot Mirror
I just searched for some sweet cougar action, and google was happy to advertise appropriately. CougarLife.com, however, comes up a fair amount in spam, and isn't advertised.
I've seen a lot of spam for these kinds of site, so there may be a valid reason for closely examining them, but if this is an editorial decision, it's repulsive.
Not necesarily - it "actively developing" or even "producing" could include sale as a package of the patent. But I don't understand why broad patents would be useless. Surely, the broader the better.
The interesting question is if Google is turning a profit from all the resources they've invested.
I believe Microsoft is doing quite well from licensing the 100s of their patents in the Linux kernel.
The interface would be especially appealing if it came with all those apps.
Thank you very much.
TFA could have mentioned it.
I wouldn't mind if they used an escape character sequence and then mapped other alphabets to strings of Latin characters, but actually breaking backwards compatibility...
Backtrack 3 supports the delightful AWUS036h - a powerful USB WiFi adapter that allows packet crafting.
Chromium on Ubuntu handles it all nicely.
I've always imagined I could spray shit for a couple of feet if I had to.
A delightful microfan to hum you to sleep.
I think it's more likely that the FSF offered their pleas after the decision had obviously been made.
The ability to read in sunlight is the one thing keeping me tied to either p-books or my crappy eReader.
But the Mini 5 doesn't have an exceptionally high resolution, and has some weird 30 pin adapter. What about it do you find appealing? The size of the on-screen keyboard?
I believe that Google should spare no expense in SOLID build quality. Even if it's expensive, a high-resolution, magnesium-cased, tough, PADD-style device would make Android the platform with clearly the BEST tablet device. Put the best of everything into it; cameras, good speakers. Enough to mesmerize the tech journalists. Other, more reasonable, price-points would benefit from being in that market.
Letting them see me switching from Yahoo to Google would just look retarded. Like Ubuntu couldn't afford Google, but had the next best thing.