Slashdot Mirror


User: naplam33

naplam33's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
38
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 38

  1. Skeptic on Mozilla's New JavaScript Engine Coming September 1 · · Score: -1

    I've never seen any of firefox's much publicized JS upgrades perform any better than previously. Why would it happen now? I think Firefox is doomed, Google is going to kill it (and by tossing money at it!, clever move), and impose Chrome in the long run. I use firefox regularly and it's been so-so in terms of performance for years now, lock-ups and slow loading with several tabs or heavy sites are too common in my experience. It's annoying

  2. Re:According to Claude Shannon... on SETI Institute Is Looking For a Few Good Algorithms · · Score: -1

    Not just that, we're using technology that has only had 100 years of evolution, it's like looking for smoke signals, aliens are definetely not using this stuff!! this is what's so ridiculous about seti. Oh, and by the way, i don't know how it's now but the seti@home software used to suck big time: no binaries available with cpu-specific optimizations (which i compiled and verified that resulted in several times faster code) and no options to limit cpu use. Watch out, next news about seti is probably an iPhone app or some crap of that sort, heh..

  3. Please, it's bloated enough already on Firefox 4.0 Beta 1 Released · · Score: -1, Troll

    I don't need more support for XYZ whatever. I need it to be stable and fast, right now it's sort of a Netscape 4, its bloated, slow, and hangs ocasionally. And no i'm not using tons of extensions.

  4. Re:Formula change on Apple To Issue a 'Fix' For iPhone 4 Reception Perception · · Score: 0

    no, actually this is apple's fix: bars += 2;

  5. Re:Slashdot's great progress on IBM Makes Firefox Its Corporate Browser · · Score: 0

    We have great moderators here dude. I always get -1 flamebait/troll/irrelevant/whatever Perma-bad karma

  6. Corporate culture on IBM Makes Firefox Its Corporate Browser · · Score: -1, Troll

    I think IBM just waited until Firefox was sluggish and bloated enough.

  7. Re:What's counterintuitive about it? on The Tuesday Birthday Problem · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    well thanks for repeating the same bs again. now, care to explain why?

  8. Ir could be many things, I have some suggestions on Tracking Down Wi-Fi Interference? · · Score: 0

    Even a microwave oven, but it's weird it's lasting exactly 2 hours. Maybe some of your neighbours has some household "experiment" running (fusion reactor anyone?) Arrange this with your neighbours: each one of you tries channel 1, 6 and 12, just to check that it affects all frequencies or just one. Another thing you could try: get a directional antenna to try to find the source of the interference (if you point it towards the interference source you should get few or none aps when passively scanning -with kismet for example). Taking into account you have like 2 hours, you can triangulate an approximate location.

  9. but where is it? on Visa Launches PayPal Alternative · · Score: 0, Interesting

    payclick.com is a parked domain, and i can't find info on visa.com

  10. Re:DO NOT WANT: print server, storage, P2P daemon, on Cheap ADSL Holds Up 802.11n Router Design · · Score: 0

    My thoughts exactly, but the clueless people they sell to don't pay attention to that. Torrent file-sharing in my router! whoo-hoo! let's buy this!. Overheating switches and wireless nics are very common... these products are made to last just 3 or 4 years at most, if they're not in a cold environment. Hell, most would even need fans and they don't even have heatsinks inside. And Linksys are good, other brands are just compact toasters waiting to fail at any minute.

  11. Re:So? on Why Google's Wi-Fi Payload Collection Was Inadvertent · · Score: 0

    yeah, except they did filter the data to keep the unencrypted stuff and dump the encrypted data.

  12. Re:I trust Google on this one. on Why Google's Wi-Fi Payload Collection Was Inadvertent · · Score: 0

    yeah, right. they weren't forced to disclose it and play good guys since european authorities have an eye on them...

  13. Re:While I agree Google did nothing wrong... on Why Google's Wi-Fi Payload Collection Was Inadvertent · · Score: 0

    Because, obviously, they wanted to mine the data. wake up guys... this is no silly mistake!

  14. I don't buy it on Why Google's Wi-Fi Payload Collection Was Inadvertent · · Score: 0

    For god's sake, if you want to map access points, you just need to look at 802.11 management frames. Keeping data packets is not only useless, it takes a lot of disk space. It was either intentional or unbelievably stupid (i'll let you guess which one...). TFA is a joke, you cannot infer essid (text ap name) from data, mac is useless, even if you do look at data packet headers, you don't need to log the data or look into them.

  15. Re:Well on Backdoor Found In UnrealIRCd Source Archive · · Score: 0

    Nobody checks the signatures. But yeah, somebody would eventually have noticed in 1.5 years and told the maintainers if they had signed the packages.

  16. Re:free but not cheap on Where Do You Go When Google Locks You Out? · · Score: 0

    when the payment is getting ads shoved in our face in every page, let us complain. It's not like anyone, less so a big company, gives anything for free.

  17. Re:Machiavellis indeed on Privacy Machiavellis · · Score: 0

    He isn't talking about you, clever guy. It's a fact that the average user will be tricked into choosing poorly or not at all, and that's their intention. The thing is they're not playing fair. The price tag is not hanging there for you to see, rather, it's concealed and kept away from you so you can't really know what you're actually giving up in payment.

  18. Re:Hey, on Google Says It Mistakenly Collected Wi-Fi Data While Mapping · · Score: 0

    They noticed from day one because it was intentional, there's no way they'd do it by accident (and for three years haha. They must think we're retarded.

  19. Re:Hey, on Google Says It Mistakenly Collected Wi-Fi Data While Mapping · · Score: 0

    You're right, there's NO WAY that was being done by accident. All that stuff takes space, you would obviously NOT log everything if you want to just log network names from beacon frames. Google FAIL.

  20. I think I know the "internal" name for the meeting on Facebook Calls All-Hands Meeting On Privacy · · Score: 0

    They call it "how to keep on pissing on their privacy and get away with it"

  21. Re:Poor Mandrake on Mandriva Up For Sale · · Score: 0

    it was the ubuntu of the time. But at least it was based on Redhat. Then came that thing.. debian... argh...

  22. Re:How prevalent? on Win7 Can Delete All System Restore Points On Reboot · · Score: 0

    hey hey, that it's temporary doesn't mean you want it wiped every time you reboot!! i don't know how prevalent it is now but php web servers used to store sessions on tmp, so, yeah it's temporary data, it doesn't hurt too much if it's lost, but you don't want users having to re-login just because your server rebooted do you?

  23. Shady Facebook on Facebook Retroactively Makes More User Data Public · · Score: 0

    I don't know if it's just coincidence, but i'm editing my profile to remove details right now and all of a sudden facebook is unavailable and takes several minutes to seem back online... It happens every time i remove details in my profile and try to save the changes. And I also noticed i'm in a group ("help fight against lyme disease" wtf is that anyway?), that i've not joined. And no my account has not been hacked.

  24. Re:Android on Google Acquires Chip Maker Startup Agnilux · · Score: 0

    They're trying to find something that works besides online advertising. It's called not putting all your eggs in one basket... but it's not an easy thing to do, most businesses do have all the eggs in one basket. But so far Google's branching out is a FAIL. I'd keep trying too, though.

  25. Re:Lawsuit in the oven on Google Acquires Chip Maker Startup Agnilux · · Score: 0

    I'd guess at least some of their contracts at apple included at least one or two pretty strict clauses they can try to enforce as soon as they can prove what they're working on at Google.