Slashdot Mirror


Tracking Down Wi-Fi Interference?

Nicros writes "Almost every evening, between 8:30 and 10:00, my Wi-Fi just dies. This, in itself, could be explained by a crappy Wi-Fi source or some hardware failure, except that I know both of my neighbors are experiencing the same loss of signal at the same time. While the Wi-Fi is down, the LAN is OK, and anything plugged into Cat5 can access the Internet just fine. One possibility comes to mind — perhaps some other neighbor arrives home and turns on their router from 8:30 to 10:00? And something in their signal is hosing our Wi-Fi? I have tried looking around for software to help identify the source of interference, but either the programs are ridiculously expensive for a home user, or else my card (Intel Link 1000 BGN) isn't supported. (Netstumbler is an example of the latter.) Any suggestions on how I can track this down?"

499 comments

  1. report it to the fcc by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let them track it down for you, it's their job. Have your neighbors report the problem also. For 3 reports they'll be there next day with triangulation equipment.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm....no....WiFi is an unlicensed service. Unlicensed services do not receive any special protection. This is not a licensed service, FCC does not care.

    2. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unlicensed means you can operate such a device without an operator's license.

      It does *not* mean that the FCC doesn't care, or that they won't investigate interference.

    3. Re:report it to the fcc by FSWKU · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions:

      1. This device may not cause harmful interference, and
      2. This device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.

      Meaning that the FCC won't do anything if your microwave is making your router go wonky. But since there is something causing outside interference to multiple people, they WILL track it down, as that means there is a device somewhere in your neighborhood that is violating the first part of the above condition.

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    4. Re:report it to the fcc by dattaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WiFi is an unlicensed service. Unlicensed services do not receive any special protection.

      I've known a few people who had visits from the FCC for unlicensed transmitters...

    5. Re:report it to the fcc by GSloop · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know if they'll come and check things out, but they do care about unlicensed bands - if you're way outside the power envelope allowed, I'm sure they'll whack you upside the head just as bad as if you were doing it in licensed spectrum.

      Given the symptoms, I wouldn't be surprised to find something in the spectrum being used that IS outside the allowed power-limits.

      However, I think you're more likely to get results if you find out what the offending device/person/entity is and asking them to help resolve the conflict. If they don't then you can move on to a complaint with the FCC based on power-output.

    6. Re:report it to the fcc by Imrik · · Score: 0

      That's kind of the problem, they don't know what the offending device/person/entity is and know of no way of tracking it

    7. Re:report it to the fcc by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Enter the clever technology of triangulation.

    8. Re:report it to the fcc by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...enter the FCC. That's kinda what they do....

    9. Re:report it to the fcc by GSloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'll find a prior posted thread of mine about a spec analyzer. Perhaps it's out of financial range for the poster, since they seem to want a virtually no-cost solution, but I do offer suggestions on a spec analyzer for around $100, which is pretty good.

      I didn't want to dupe that info in this thread, and it wasn't exactly the point of my post anyway. The GP claimed the FCC didn't care about unlicensed spectrum, but they do. However, they'll care a lot more if you show up with some real data - rather than "someone" must be doing something bad since my wifi doesn't work.

      -Greg

    10. Re:report it to the fcc by plover · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's a cheap build-it-yourself spectrum analyzer: http://hackaday.com/2010/03/17/im-me-spectrum-analyzer/ The IM-ME can be had for about $15 or so, and is purportedly very hackable.

      --
      John
    11. Re:report it to the fcc by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's an unlicensed service, provided you use licensed hardware to operate on it. That means, there's FCC certification behind all the commercial wifi gear you use. If you modify it or add on power boosting transmitters, you're using unlicensed hardware and the FCC will come after you.

    12. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless what's causing the interference isn't a part 15 device.

    13. Re:report it to the fcc by davester666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They won't do anything because it's due to a special satellite that happens to pass over his neighborhood everyday...

      Maybe if he covered his router in tin-foil?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    14. Re:report it to the fcc by Cylix · · Score: 4, Informative

      That device only covers 281 - 361, 378 - 481, and 749 - 962 MHz bands. It will not be useful for debugging the 2.4ghz spectrum.

      There are likely some other options for a cheap analyzer around. I had some friends in a wireless shop convert an AP to a spectrum analyzer via a firmware update . However, those AP's were intended for commercial use and the price was a bit too steep.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    15. Re:report it to the fcc by labnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      http://hackaday.com/2010/03/17/im-me-spectrum-analyzer/ [hackaday.com] The IM-ME can be had for about $15 or so, and is purportedly very hackable.

      But it's... pink...

      --
      46137
    16. Re:report it to the fcc by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      Or try switching through channels 1,6 and 11 until you find one where you don't get interference. That's what I do...

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    17. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Poppy Cock.

      If you really think the FCC is going to give a flying hoot about interference received by a part 15 device - special when part of it's spectrum is shared with a licensed service - you're living in Lala-land.

      Sorry, but your home WiFi stuff is so far down the food-chain as to be a non-entity. Now, screw with a cell tower, ATC radar or public safety trunking site and they'll take notice - but even then, problems can take years to be resolved.

    18. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First would it not be best to change your wifi channel of your router.

    19. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A part 15 device is not an part 15 device if it break the rules(causing the interference).

    20. Re:report it to the fcc by Atario · · Score: 5, Funny

      So is your dick. Do you avoid that too?

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    21. Re:report it to the fcc by Kymermosst · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point was that say someone is operating under the part 97 (amateur service) rules in the frequencies of WiFi that overlap the ham band... who do you think wins?

      The guy with the license, that's who.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    22. Re:report it to the fcc by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It does *not* mean that the FCC doesn't care, or that they won't investigate interference."

      Investigate it yourself.

      Go from house to house, both sides of your street, pounding on doors, yelling "I'm gunna start kicking some ass if you don't stop interfering with my WiFi Signal! Pussy! C'mon!".

      The guy that DOESN'T come outside and kick your ass is the culprit. Speak to him privately after you get out of the hospital. I'm sure the two of you can come to a reasonable solution to the issue if you just relax and work things out rationally.

    23. Re:report it to the fcc by Quabbe · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's the funniest thing I've read all day. Made me laugh out loud and show the guy next to me. I was having a shit day until now, thanks :)

    24. Re:report it to the fcc by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I think you're more likely to get results if you find out what the offending device/person/entity is and asking them to help resolve the conflict.

      As long as they're not a major criminal or terrorist, I'm sure they'll be happy to co-operate. So if they don't help, just report them to the cops or FBI or something.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:report it to the fcc by jetole · · Score: 2, Informative

      For about $30 - $40 you can get the Ubiquiti AirView spectrum analyzer usb dongle. From what I understand this will run on linux (don't quote me on that. I don't own one). http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&safe=off&q=ubiquiti%20airview&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wf

    26. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that! So reasonable, and energetic!

    27. Re:report it to the fcc by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, white boy.

      I am not a fucking cowboy.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    28. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      airodump-ng --showack -w output mon0

      take note that all your idiotic neighbors all use channel 6 for everything.

      decrypt WEP/WPA keys for router.

      connect to router, login using default (never changed) credentials.

      upload notepad.exe to router as a firmware upgrade.

      no wireless devices running in range of your equipment.

    29. Re:report it to the fcc by ZigiSamblak · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you live close to water where big ships dock then there's a good chance it could be radar. It may sound far fetched but it has happened before with a company who couldn't figure out why the entire wireless network went down every day at the same time. Turned out there was a harbour with big navy ships nearby, due to the tide the ships radar would be at a certain height at a specific time each day which would cause the radar to interfere with wireless signals.

    30. Re:report it to the fcc by rikkards · · Score: 1

      You know I heard the same story ten years ago but it was that a server would spontaneously reboot. I have a feeling this may be an urban myth.

    31. Re:report it to the fcc by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And here's another one along similar lines. Some time ago, someone's network went down regularly at the same time every evening. In the end, it was found that the bank on the floors below was turning on a microwave-based motion detector after closing. Perhaps in this WiFi case, something industrial or commercial is being activated nightly nearby? 8:30 to 10 seems a lot like cleaning staff hours. Maybe a floor polisher motor or vacuum with bad brushes putting out a lot of EMI.

    32. Re:report it to the fcc by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that that thing is the microwave oven. In his own house. Making non-stop hot pockets.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    33. Re:report it to the fcc by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then it's time some currently unemployed, enterprisey wireless technician starts a small company that resolves these conflicts.

      Provided the FCC *will* act if someone provided them with tanglible and independently verified proof that a certain household or device is causing intereference, there's a business opportunity for someone with skills and interest in doing that.

      I'm sure there's a lot of small to middle businesses out there that would love to have someone point out interference sources to their wireless infrastructure, since they more and more depend on all that DECT, WiFi and other stuff to properly work. Barcode readers, POS card terminals, RFID scanners, employee paging services - all those work in the same unlicensed 2.4 and 5GHz band and depend on all other equipment and operators to behave themselves.

      One rogue AP operator illegally boosting a cheap home router to reach the edge of his yard can seriously hamper businesses half a kilometer around. Someone will pay money to pinpoint the source and resolve that issue, either by friendly negotiations or technician-approved notices to the FCC. The offender can then be sued for compensation, incl. the cost of the wireless tracking technician.

      Maybe someone here gets an old van, puts cheap triangulating equipment inside and starts that business. The equipment costs about 10.000 bucks, this could repay itself in a few months....

    34. Re:report it to the fcc by Tarchan · · Score: 1

      That's definitely a possibility. My first assumption was to to assume some kind of industrial appliance. Although I definitely wouldn't rule out radar either. I don't know for sure if wireless signals would be affected, but some years ago a ship entering the local harbor forgot to turn off it's radar and caused problems for CRT monitors throughout my office and around the city.

    35. Re:report it to the fcc by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The interference could very well be due to a harmonic of something that's actually more strongly broadcasting in one of those bands. In fact, if it's a person being naughty, it's pretty *likely* that it's someone in one of those bands, since consumer equipment with any power to it starts to get pretty scarce in availability above about 1 GHz.

      Except for Microwave ovens, of course.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    36. Re:report it to the fcc by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      For shame, man! There is no way that your neighbor's router is licensed to run a copy of Genuine Microsoft Notepad.exe

      Just use the first four megabytes that come out of /dev/random. Odds are that those 4 megabytes violate somebody's software patent; but at least the BSA won't be after you.

    37. Re:report it to the fcc by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Using what equipment? When was the last time you took cheap, consumer-grade equipment and triangulated the location of a particular 2.4 GHz transmitter to within, say, ten meters?

    38. Re:report it to the fcc by AlecC · · Score: 1

      No - I once worked on a computer installed in a Naval base. The computer had to be placed in a shielded room with airlock-style shielded double doors because the radars outside caused the entire computer to malfunction.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    39. Re:report it to the fcc by dintech · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the type of thing that's caused by a cordless phone that's too powerful. Perhaps an import from another country. 8:30 to 10:00 is possibly the time a local house wife will be on the phone with her mother. Just a thought...

    40. Re:report it to the fcc by JackCroww · · Score: 2, Informative

      This has to be an urban legend because the tide is not at the same height at the same time each day. The full tide cycle is roughly 12 hours, 18 minutes, so the time of high tide is going to be at a different time each day.

      Try again.

      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    41. Re:report it to the fcc by mowall · · Score: 1

      Made me laugh out loud and show the guy next to me.

      I do hope you mean you showed the funny post to the guy next to you.

    42. Re:report it to the fcc by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD:
      http://xkcd.com/654/

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    43. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a GNAA joke in here somewhere but I don't even wanna fucking think about it!

    44. Re:report it to the fcc by robot256 · · Score: 1

      Very possible. Wifi occupies 2.401 to 2.473 GHz. There is a Ham band occupying 2.390 to 2.450 GHz (see lower right corner). You could try looking for a house with a bunch of antennas and/or dishes on it and ask nicely what he is up to.

    45. Re:report it to the fcc by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Then it's time some currently unemployed, enterprisey wireless technician starts a small company that resolves these conflicts.

      The gu cant afford a $99.00 WiSpy, what makes you think he will afford the $99.00 charge from a guy doing this?

      I certainly would not drive to someones house and spend an hour doing that with my special gear for less than that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    46. Re:report it to the fcc by lordkuri · · Score: 1

      +5 Interesting? really?

      FYI, consumer WiFi uses unlicensed radio spectrum, and is subject to FCC "Part 15" rules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_CFR_Part_15

      This almost always means that the device is required to accept any interference that may be present.

      Sorry, you can call the FCC all you like, but I'm quite certain that the nice receptionist that answers the phone will gladly take down your name and number for "someone to call you back" and then promptly toss it in the trash.

    47. Re:report it to the fcc by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      A couple of days ago, I was using my microwave oven while watching a MythTV stream over the Wi-Fi network from a laptop three feet away. Not even a hiccup.

      The whole point of the design of a microwave is that the holes in its Faraday cage are much smaller than the wavelength of the signal generator within. If your microwave is wrecking your Wi-Fi connection, don't grumble about it. Get a newer microwave oven.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    48. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now THAT is the funniest thing I've heard all day!

    49. Re:report it to the fcc by AB3A · · Score: 1

      Uh, no.

      Note to moderators: this is not interesting. It is very misinformed.

      All WiFi must comply with 47CFR15.5(b).

      All WiFi operates under the condition that it does not interfere with other licensed operations, and that it accepts interference from other sources without complaint to the FCC. The principle is the same world wide: If you opt out of a formal licensing scheme, you shouldn't expect support or enforcement of interference claims.

      This is why radio licenses exist. The process may be arcane, expensive and even ridiculous. However, without a license, you have no legal recourse if someone interferes with your operation. I'll be the first to concede that there is much we could do to improve and speed up the licensing schemes. However, that bureaucracy is a subject for another rant. The fact that it may be done poorly does not mean that it isn't necessary.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    50. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, at that point we call the cops, and make noise in the press, make a big stink, and the asshole ham loses his antennas.
      Put that in your collective ham radio pipe and smoke it.

      The sooner we get ham radio off OUR airwaves, the better.

    51. Re:report it to the fcc by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Speaking of CRT monitors I remember when Sceptre monitors came with instructions in the manual that if you had banding on the screen then your monitor was not facing True North and recommending you reposition it so it was to correct the issue.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    52. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... try changing the channel?

    53. Re:report it to the fcc by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know I heard the same story ten years ago but it was that a server would spontaneously reboot. I have a feeling this may be an urban myth.

      No ... I was working in a Norfolk hospital lab when some idiot turned on the horizon-scanning radar for an aircraft carrier that was nearby - it should have been locked down, but wasn't. A lot of our electronics readouts went berserk from the induced interference, harmonics and other crap that thing was belching out. ICU had it worse because all their heart monitors and ventilators were affected. It was an interesting few minutes.

    54. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      racist

    55. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is your dick. Do you avoid that too?

      This has to be the best post I've ever seen on a Tech forum! HAHAHA.

    56. Re:report it to the fcc by noidentity · · Score: 1
      How does he know any FCC guidelines are being violated? These devices operate in the unlicensed spectrum, I believe, and must handle unwanted interference.

      He could probably move it around during that time, and figure out some kind of directionality to the effect, to help track down the direction to look in. Then keep track of what days it doesn't happen, and see if a neighbor is gone during precisely those days. Or look for a light coming on around the time ig begins, and going off around when it ends.

    57. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RACIST!!!!

    58. Re:report it to the fcc by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless the interference cause isn't subject to Part 15. The general pecking order in most of the ISM bands is:

      Primary user: Military - They can run whatever power levels they want, and the secondary/tertiary users are screwed. However, the military typically stays out of the ISM bands because they're an interference cesspool unless they run crazy power levels.
      Secondary user: Amateur (ham) radio operators - Legal limit 1500W, can't interfere with the military but can interfere with the tertiary user (but usually try to avoid doing so), and tend to stay away from the ISM bands for the same reason as the military. Occasionally hams will reclassify Part 15 devices under Part 97 (pretty much need to disable encryption and adhere to IDing rules), but it's very rare these days - just not worth the trouble.
      Tertiary user: Unlicensed users.

      The FCC is unlikely to investigate unless you have some evidence. Get a card supported by NetStumbler or Kismet (this won't help you much if your interference source is not 802.11), or get a 2.4 GHz spectrum analyzer such as the Ubiqiti AirView2-EXT ($60) or WiSpy 2.4x ($200).

      I'm surprised that an Intel card isn't supported by any of the Wi-Fi monitoring tools. Intel cards usually are. (Maybe Kismet supports it but NS doesn't?)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    59. Re:report it to the fcc by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I would reccommend the $60 EXT version and a cantenna (fab-corp.com sells Cantenna kits that include an N female chassis connector and a whateveryouneed-to-N-male pigtail) - You'll need some directionality to nail down the source.

      May also need some attenuators for sniffing "close in"

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    60. Re:report it to the fcc by vbraga · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly it was one of the first Stanford computers, an IBM if memory serves well. But I can't find a reference to it.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    61. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *AHEM* I am afraid to ask HOW you know HIS dick is pink but ...

      I know MINE is NOT PINK.

    62. Re:report it to the fcc by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "All WiFi must comply with 47CFR15.5(b) [gpo.gov]."

      No it doesn't. It's perfectly legal to reclassify it under Part 97 rules if you have the appropriate license. (However, most owners of such licenses will try to take corrective action if they discover they are causing interference, which is why hams tend to stay out of the 2.4 GHz band in the first place.)

      Same for military users (primary user in the band, but they usually stay away for the same reason as the hams).

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    63. Re:report it to the fcc by vbraga · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Found it:

      From SAIL "autobiography" (here):

      I got proper air conditioning a short time later, but unfortunately developed a bad case of hiccups that struck regularly at 12 second intervals. My assistants spent a number of days trying to find the cause of this mysterious malady without success. As luck would have it, somebody brought a portable radio into my room one day and noticed that it was emitting a "Bzz" at regular intervals -- in fact, at the same moment that I hicced. Further investigation revealed that the high-powered air defense radar atop Mt. Umunhum, about 20 miles away, was causing some of my transistors to act as radio receivers. We solved this problem by improving my grounding.

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    64. Re:report it to the fcc by stevew · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand - they aren't "YOUR" airwaves. You are a guest in the amateur's spectrum in this case, not the other way around.

      RF spectrum is something that is actually coordinated on an international level typically. So those ham bands are likely ham bands in multiple countries within what is known as an ITU region. That being the case - who has priority is actually not always decided by the FCC.

      In any case, the licensed service has precedence over part 15 devices. That's the law as written. It's been that way for a LONG time. Put that up your wi-fi router and sniff it?

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    65. Re:report it to the fcc by Junior+Samples · · Score: 1

      The FCC doesn't care. This is unlicensed equipment.

    66. Re:report it to the fcc by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      ...coming from somebody named " Eunuchswear"

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    67. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them track it down for you, it's their job. Have your neighbors report the problem also. For 3 reports they'll be there next day with triangulation equipment.

      Your WiFi router operates under part 15 of the FCC rules and cannot generate any interference and must accept any interference it receives. That means legal course of action is limited and that your ISP does NOT have to find the issue for you.
        That being said, I would look for a neighbor who has children and then ask them if they have a wireless camera system. Many operate on 2.4GHz and they can be quite the spectrum hogs. Heck it could even be one of the neighbors who is experiencing the issue like yourself. I suspect a camera because 8:30 is a reasonable bedtime for young children and 10:00 is a common bedtime for adults. The adults turn on a cam to monitor the kids and turn it off when they go to bed.
        Other sources are old wireless phones or microwaves but due to the duration of the interference it seems most unlikely. Good luck.

    68. Re:report it to the fcc by Junior+Samples · · Score: 1

      If a licensed service is causing the interference, there is no basis for a complaint. Unlicensed services have no priority with regard to licensed services and must put up with the interference.

      If the interference is from another unlicensed source, you still have to put up with the interference. The FCC is not interested.

      Now, if an unlicensed service is causing interference to a licensed service, the FCC may be interested, but the licensed service will likely have to track down the source of interference on his own.

    69. Re:report it to the fcc by boxwood · · Score: 1

      its says on the device that it accepts all interference or words to that effect. Meaning that if the device is getting interfered with you have to accept that.

    70. Re:report it to the fcc by sayno2quat · · Score: 1

      While it's true that wireless is not affected by the microwave radiation, a microwave could still cause interference based on power usage. I know that whenever our blender is turned on, our tv (crt) shows wavy lines.

      All that being moot when talking about neighbor interference. I don't think one could interfere with another house by using electricity (aside from causing a brownout/blackout).

      --
      Sure I sold you robot insurance. But you were attacked by a cyborg. Not covered.
    71. Re:report it to the fcc by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used the Wi-Spy 2.4i and easily tracked down a source of interference (in my case, a wireless rear-view trailer camera) in a crowded convention hall in a matter of minutes, and I didn't even know what I was doing at the time. It was crapping all over my Wi-Fi network, and as soon as they shut it off, I was back in business again.

      I've since upgraded to the 2.4x model and track down Wi-Fi interference all the time. I would consider $99 cheap, consumer grade equipment. (Assuming you already own a laptop.)

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    72. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the news, its global warming dude!

    73. Re:report it to the fcc by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      And the even cleverer inverse square law. Most likely the offending equipment is being used by a next door neighbor. And it may be whichever one lives nearest to your equipment.

      For a year the house next door was vacant. That year was the best TV reception we ever had.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    74. Re:report it to the fcc by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It could be a LOT of things; not necessarily electronics. It could be a power tool or a sump pump generating harmonic frequencies of the 60 hz power cycle. I don't see an FCC cert on a vacuum cleaner, but the TV never worked too well when it was running.

    75. Re:report it to the fcc by rilian4 · · Score: 1

      I have a co-worker who has told me that her wifi dies when she turns on her microwave oven. Her router sits very near the microwave. As your neighbors are also being affected, that lends evidence that the interference is caused by a pretty strong signal. Look for a business that uses something around those hours.

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    76. Re:report it to the fcc by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Having read a lot of enforcement logs though - if your just an individual unless you have ample evidence on what is actually causing the interference they won't really do much. Lets face facts - consumer electronics are highly prone to transient glitches that come and go.

      And once you do have evidence (neighbors electric fence, utility pole issue etc) they'll send a warning letter with some resources on resolving said interference as a first step.

      Now if you are interfering with police/fire/government or other licensed communications (like broadcasters) they will send out the RDF trucks.

    77. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm african american you insensitive clod!

    78. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a never-nude, you insensitive clod!

      --Tobias

    79. Re:report it to the fcc by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      I certainly avoid everyone else's!

    80. Re:report it to the fcc by wcrowe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ...why the entire wireless network went down every day at the same time...

      That sounds pretty far-fetched to me. Tides do not arrive at the same time every day.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    81. Re:report it to the fcc by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, the FCC doesn't use cheap, consumer-grade equipment.

    82. Re:report it to the fcc by random+coward · · Score: 1

      You assume that if FCC/ITU removes the ham bands that they will be given to "the people" for use in mobile internet etc. Most likely is that if they are removed they will be auctioned off and AT&T will be coming to your house to rape you for using that wifi in THIER 2.4GHz band that they sell access to for $$$$ per month. Because at that point all your part 15 wifi gear will be "interfering" with AT&T's 5G network cells(at least according to AT&T and their "connect anywhere" campaign). You'll lose all your gear and pay a fine. To add insult to injury two months later when the tornado comes through and the whole phone network is down you won't have anyone to help you call for help now that there isn't a ham radio operator down the street.

    83. Re:report it to the fcc by nametaken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't ever brick someones router, especially since they'd just go get a new one and we'd be back where we started. What I have occasionally done is survey from a friends living room, then connect to all the open and default pw'd ap's around their house and adjust what channels everyone is on. I mostly consider it a service to the neighborhood, but no, I do not go over to the neighbors houses and survey again to find out if they don't have a more distant neighbor that they're now banging heads with.

      I kinda hate consumer wifi. I sometimes wish there were something governing its use that prevented there from being 300 routers for 300 tenants in one apartment building. It's especially nasty that AT&T rolls out their ewire devices everywhere for home dsl and doesn't care about their configuration other than to lock them down.

    84. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      airodump-ng --showack -w output mon0

      take note that all your idiotic neighbors all use channel 6 for everything.

      decrypt WEP/WPA keys for router.

      connect to router, login using default (never changed) credentials.

      upload notepad.exe to router as a firmware upgrade.

      no wireless devices running in range of your equipment.

      also look to see who is using a 2.4 ghz cordless phone that gets on the phone every night. with more power associated to that radio, they could be using all the spectrum available.

    85. Re:report it to the fcc by zill · · Score: 1

      For a year the house next door was vacant. That year was the best TV reception we ever had.

      Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you said, but those words made me lose all faith in humanity.

      Human beings - waterbags that degrade your TV signal since 1925

    86. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or your labia. whichever.

    87. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the sodium vapor light next to my house is modulated at the same frequency as my WiFi point. Whenever the light comes on --- there goes my wifi signal. Since this is an un-regulated band, the response is that it is up to you to handle interference.

    88. Re:report it to the fcc by Yert · · Score: 1

      Wifi is 2.4GHz. Microwave ovens are also 2.4GHz. She has a leaky oven.

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    89. Re:report it to the fcc by AB3A · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that most readers are not licensed amateur radio operators trying to pass themselves off as uber wifi users. The original post mentioned nothing of the sort. However, you are correct --mostly. I have yet to see any case law from the FCC that suggests any sort of primacy for an amateur radio operation of this sort.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    90. Re:report it to the fcc by Yert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...except that local and state governments are forbidden by federal law to enforce ordinances restricting the construction or use of licensed radio equipment, including antennas, by lawfully operating licensed operators.

      If it weren't for amateur radio, a lot of the technology you take for granted wouldn't exist, including your cellphone. Seriously, man, get a grip.

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    91. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might not be caucasian, you insensitive clod! ;)

    92. Re:report it to the fcc by Surt · · Score: 1

      It's not true. Wireless can be interfered with by microwaves. I can demonstrate it with your choice of two microwaves, on separate power circuits from the router, and can show you that a 1500 watt heater does not interfere, even 20 feet closer to the router.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    93. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, hams haven't done emergency work in years.
      You find me ONE news story of ACTUAL ham assistance from a REPUTABLE news source in the last year. Just try it!
      (Oh, and getting chased off Haiti by the locals doesn't count!)

    94. Re:report it to the fcc by Surt · · Score: 1

      Intentional transmitters are subject to power limitations, unintentional transmitters are subject to fines.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    95. Re:report it to the fcc by diablovision · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but high and low tide occur twice (each) per day, and tide schedules shift by about 50 minutes each day. They can also vary due to other factors such as wind conditions, shape of the harbor, ocean conditions, phase of the moon (interaction between the Sun's tidal effects and the moon's), etc. If this was happening every day at the same time, I find it highly unlikely that tides were the root cause.

      --
      120 characters isn't enough to explain it.
    96. Re:report it to the fcc by Surt · · Score: 1

      However, unlicensed over-powered operation in the wifi band is still a no-no that the fcc will investigate.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    97. Re:report it to the fcc by AB3A · · Score: 1

      You're assuming it is overpowered. It may not be.

      Part of the 802.11 specification contains a behavior known as clear channel availability (CCA) checking. If there is energy on a channel, the unit is not supposed to transmit, on the theory that it might interfere with something.

      That something could be a leaky microwave oven. It could be a video transmitter. It could be someone who uses a wireless phone. It could be virtually anything.

      All it has to do is to transmit continuously. It can be quite weak. The thresholds for CCA are typically very low. A continuous signal will inhibit other units from transmitting. Whatever that signal is, do not be surprised if it is entirely legal.

      Again, that's what Part 15 is all about...

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    98. Re:report it to the fcc by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see. 2.4 GHz would be the 40 millionth harmonic of 60Hz. Not too much energy up there.

      The reason your television doesn't work well when your vacuum is on is that the vacuum motor's load seriously disrupts the AC power circuit in your house. The television's power supply is designed to turn fairly clean 60Hz power into DC at a couple of voltages. If you get crazy transients going from a heavy load, you're going to have ripple in your television's circuits.

      If your television doesn't work when your next house neighbor uses his vacuum cleaner something is *seriously* wrong. The OP is talking about trouble that affects several houses, so it has to be something that originates in these microwave bands.

    99. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think you're kidding? The average ham nowadays doesn't know what a soldering iron is, let alone how to use one. All they do is buy the latest $10,000 black box from Yaesu or Kenwood, plunk it on their desk, dial their amplifier up to 11, and drop down to 20 or 80 meters to yammer on for hours about how bad their corns are and how Obama's birth certificate is fake. The fact that the ham test is now 30 questions multiple answer selection should tell you how far the FCC had to dumb things down to keep the ham radio service occupied. It's not only dead, it's been dead so long it's stopped stinking and now just wastes space. (Oh, and when they do get digital things, it's always something made somewhere else. Hell, the "new" DStar digital voice "standard" they're trying to use as an example of "modern" communications is CLOSED-SOURCE PATENTED PROPRIETARY and they aren't allowed to TOUCH it! What kind of a joke is that?)

    100. Re:report it to the fcc by jjhall · · Score: 2, Informative

      Normally I don't feed the trolls, but sometimes the trolls just beg to be fed a little bit of humble pie. It took all of about 20 seconds to find an article showing actual ham deployment, at the request of a local emergency agency, in the US. http://journalstar.com/news/local/article_84aba07a-3d9b-11df-8d7a-001cc4c03286.html A local news source including video from officials involved. Is that "reputable" enough for you?

      And ham radio isn't just using "ancient analog technologies" to chat with each other about the bad conditions in nursing homes. While there is a lot of analog technology still in use, hams are also at the forefront of digital (extremely) narrow bandwidth communications development. The other thing to consider is that old analog technology doesn't stop working because one ham's clock is set a little off from another's, essentially what happened in Nebraska to take the 911 systems offline.

      Ham radio is also not slowly dying as all the "old fogies" die off. The number of newly licensed hams is actually on the increase. http://www.ah0a.org/FCC/Graphs.html That data is sourced from the FCC license database if you want to go compile it yourself. There was a decline for a few years, but it is increasing in popularity again and is almost up to the pre-decline numbers. More and more young people are getting involved in ham radio. I know personally of several licensed hams who are 7 and 8 years old! The younger hams are very passionate about the hobby and more importantly the public service provided by hams.

      As Random Coward pointed out above, if you think if the ham bands were suddenly taken away from hams that the spectrum would all turn into "part 15" unlicensed spectrum, you must not have taken your meds for a while. You said yourself how valuable the spectrum would be if it were to be auctioned off. Do you think the FCC and the rest of the government is going to donate those billions of dollars worth of spectrum to the public domain? They'll go the the highest bidders and they will be defended from illegal users (what "the people" will be) without end.

      If you want "the public" to use the ham spectrum, nothing is stopping you from getting your license. It costs $14 to cover the expenses of the VOLUNTEERS who will administer the exam to you. Study materials are available at no charge all over the Internet. Once you have your license you'll be out a couple of hundred bucks for some radio gear to get started using the spectrum as you see fit (within the legal boundaries of course.) Ham radio is not about the "rich" people at all. It is just like any other organized hobby or service, you can do it relatively inexpensively or you can literally spend as much money as you want on it, depending on what you want to do and how far you want to take it.

      Say what you will, but your argument doesn't hold water against verifiable facts.

    101. Re:report it to the fcc by FCP · · Score: 1

      That brought back a fond memory: when I was at DGC in the mid-80's, working on the fascinating but doomed "DeviOS" project, I used to bring in my Walkperson for late-night debugging runs. I would find a nice gap in the AM band and let the minicomputer generate my musical accompaniment. Definitely felt plugged in.

      --
      .plan: file not found
    102. Re:report it to the fcc by tsm1mt · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need a 2.4Ghz transverter to go with it then..

    103. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so why not put your router in a faraday cage to protect it from interference? Damn, I'm clever

    104. Re:report it to the fcc by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      A couple of days ago, I was using my microwave oven while watching a MythTV stream over the Wi-Fi network from a laptop three feet away. Not even a hiccup.

      And the radio linked security cam on my front porch, transmitting to my TV viewing area near the back porch, is intermittently jammed by leakage from the (new) microwave oven in our kitchen and by those of the neighboring houses on either side.

      Microwave ovens DO leak a bit. Some unlicensed radios (i.e. analog video - FM I think...) are more sensitive to it than others (i.e. the forward-error-corrected digital spread-spectrum scheme of WiFi).

      The whole point of the design of a microwave is that the holes in its Faraday cage are much smaller than the wavelength of the signal generator within. If your microwave is wrecking your Wi-Fi connection, don't grumble about it. Get a newer microwave oven.

      That works for the walls and window. It doesn't work for the door joint. And making a tight metallic seal every time you closed the door would be an engineering nightmare - with nasty arcing when it got dirty.

      So instead they use a "choke joint", like the flanges on waveguides. The front wall of the oven is metallic (under the paint) and flat. The mating back wall of the door, under the plastic cover, is also metallic and flat - but has a quarter-wavelength-deep slot in it, in a squared-off "ring" around the door. The plastic keeps food out of the slot and is thick enough to insulate the two flat plates from each other despite the voltage from the microwaves. The slot acts as a half-wavelength shorted stub. The microwave energy propagating out through the crack between the door and the oven treats the slot as a quarter-wave stub. It's shorted at the bottom, so the half-wave phase reversal of the wave that goes up it and bounces makes it cancel the outward-moving wave. (Alternatively, the shorted stub looks impedance inverted and 1/0 ohms is an open circuit for waves trying to go farther.) Result: The energy goes out as far as the slot, then bounces back into the oven rather than continuing into the room.

      Except it's not perfect. You get SOME leakage. And if the door doesn't fit just right you get more. And if there's some food on the area where the slot is you get a LOT more. Not enough to cook your eyeballs or genetalia, or even warm your fingers detectably (especially in contrast to the warm air from the vent in back). But a tiny fraction of the half-kilowatt or so in the oven that gets by is still enough to interfere with radio services on that frequency (which is why they're ALL on the same, licensed, frequency). Or to drive back-biased junctions into conduction on a portable radio held near the door crack. (Try it: Hold one there for several seconds, so the diffuser "fan" will go through a whole cycle and you'll get a hot-spot over any given leak. Then move a couple inches and try again. Bet you'll get a buzz-out somewhere around the door.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    105. Re:report it to the fcc by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      due to the tide the ships radar would be at a certain height at a specific time each day

      Doesn't the timing of high- and low-tide differ each day?

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    106. Re:report it to the fcc by porkus · · Score: 1

      You find me ONE news story of ACTUAL ham assistance from a REPUTABLE news source in the last year. Just try it!
      (Oh, and getting chased off Haiti by the locals doesn't count!)

      Hams help with emergency service coordination during major Windstream 911 outage. http://journalstar.com/news/local/article_84aba07a-3d9b-11df-8d7a-001cc4c03286.html

      Put that in your hippie HAM-hating pipe and smoke it!

    107. Re:report it to the fcc by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      The FCC _will_ go out to investigate people interrupting ham traffic, even mild interruptions to non-important traffic. I don't see why wifi would be any different. I know of a case (though I don't recall many details) where they went out to investigate and caught someone who was just occasionally breaking in and talking over top of casual ham traffic. To me that seems like a much less important and much harder to trace case than wifi interruptions at a regular time. I think they spent a week or so tracking that guy down, this wifi problem shouldn't take more than an hour or so. So yea, if there are multiple complaints, I'm pretty sure they would investigate. Sure, ham traffic is a bit different than wifi because it's licensed, but for practical purposes I don't see any significant difference.

      Again, it's important to find out who else this is affecting and get as many complaints as possible (and as specific as possible in terms of when it happens and how long it's been occurring), but I would think that if there are a few detailed complaints, they'll send someone out.

    108. Re:report it to the fcc by Larryish · · Score: 1

      So using my home brew 5 watt FM transmitter to loop Slayer's "God Hates Us All" on the same band as a local Christian station for days on end... that might be a problem?

    109. Re:report it to the fcc by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      No, no, it's not the people, it's equipment that isn't shielded well enough. All the neighbors had to do was run a blender, vacuum cleaner, AC, or dishwasher and our reception degraded quite noticeably. Seemed the reception was particularly poor for half an hour between 6 and 8 when that house was occupied, so I suspect the dishwasher, but it could have been the AC-- theirs was located between our houses. Electric motors can generate lots of loud noise in the electromagnetic spectrum. Seemingly identical items can vary wildly in how noisy they are, with a few being exceptionally noisy.

      Likely things we used innocently did the same. The Apple II I started on was terrible. Messed up TV reception even though it was on the other side of the house. Lot of the early computers were very noisy. I recall that the FCC tightened standards in response. More recently, a 1G hard drive I got rid of a few years ago almost completely blotted out AM radio reception up to 2 meters away. A radio could pick up every click and whir that hard drive made. Could tell what program the computer was starting by listening to the radio.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    110. Re:report it to the fcc by ctmurray · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this link, actually answering the question asked and helping those of us with these frustrating wifi performance issues. Sorry I don't have any mod points. Also this model works with Macs if you use the Lite version of the software.

    111. Re:report it to the fcc by kbielefe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention your local ham operator:

      1) Had to pass an exam about different types of interference and how to fix them (hint: it's not always the transmitter's fault)

      2) Is likely to be passionate about avoiding interference to the point where he is unlikely to use those bands at high power in a residential area even though he has every legal right to do so. Think Linux fanboi level zealotry, but for radio.

      3) Is actually familiar enough with ham radio to know that hams are extremely unlikely to use that particular band only during those particular hours, if they use it at all.

      4) Is the least likely guy in your neighborhood to have noisy microwaves, cordless phones, or wifi, precisely because he doesn't want interference in his own ultra-sensitive ham receivers.

      5) Is the one guy in the neighborhood most likely to have the skills and equipment to track down your interference. There are a lot of hams who live for that kind of opportunity.

      Seriously, the FCC is unlikely to intervene without proof. Asking your local ham radio club for help, without blaming them, is probably your best bet.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    112. Re:report it to the fcc by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Go from house to house, both sides of your street, pounding on doors, yelling "I'm gunna start kicking some ass if you don't stop interfering with my WiFi Signal! Pussy! C'mon!".

      Well, another possible solution that might involve fewer bruises would be to go out back of your neighbor's homes and disconnect them, one by one, from the power line. When your interference stops ... there's the culprit. Now, it's possible that one or more of them might have their access point running on a UPS, so it would be best to wait a half an hour or so between each test for the battery to run down.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    113. Re:report it to the fcc by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Wifi is 2.4GHz. Microwave ovens are also 2.4GHz. She has a leaky oven.

      Yes. That happened to me. The microwave would instantly kill all wireless access in the vicinity. A new oven solved that problem.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    114. Re:report it to the fcc by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Say what you will, but your argument doesn't hold water against verifiable facts.

      I was going to say something myself, but I'd say you covered it pretty well.

      I wasn't aware that the number of HAM licenses was on the rise: that's good news. What has concerned me for a number of years now (and I grew up in the sixties, when electronics and other technical hobbies were common, and Allied Radio Shack was actually a parts store) is that there's very little to attract young people into technical pursuits nowadays. HAM radio was a big one: if you really got into it, you could build your own transmitter, and learn a lot about electronics and RF techniques. I've known a number of good engineers over the years who got into engineering because of an early start in amateur radio. For any nation that would like to maintain technological leadership, having organized hobbies to interest the younger generations in technology is a good thing. Another example is amateur rocketry, although I understand the DHS has made that a bit more difficult in recent years.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    115. Re:report it to the fcc by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You find me ONE news story of ACTUAL ham assistance from a REPUTABLE news source in the last year. Just try it! (Oh, and getting chased off Haiti by the locals doesn't count!)

      Hams help with emergency service coordination during major Windstream 911 outage. http://journalstar.com/news/local/article_84aba07a-3d9b-11df-8d7a-001cc4c03286.html

      Put that in your hippie HAM-hating pipe and smoke it!

      There was a time when HAMs were known as the "High And Mighty" and CB'ers were known as "Chicken Banders" (because they were too lazy or afraid to get an amateur license.) The GP is apparently in the latter category.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    116. Re:report it to the fcc by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      So using my home brew 5 watt FM transmitter to loop Slayer's "God Hates Us All" on the same band as a local Christian station for days on end... that might be a problem?

      We'll write you in jail.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    117. Re:report it to the fcc by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      While it's true that wireless is not affected by the microwave radiation

      What? 802.11x and microwaves operate in the 2.4 Ghz range, so of course they can interfere (well, a 40 milliwatt router isn't going to have any effect upon a 1200 watt oven, but the converse is a different story.) I know that because my old oven would kill all wireless access within fifty feet. I also happen to know that the oven and the router were on different phases, and furthermore the router was on a continuous-duty UPS. So it was the oven, it was leaky, and it interfered with (jammed, really) my access point. Used to piss me off when I was trying to use my laptop online when somebody was cooking in the kitchen.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    118. Re:report it to the fcc by jjhall · · Score: 1

      It is nice seeing the number of licensees going up, that is for sure. My grandfather was a ham, though inactive by the time I got into it. I got my license in the summer between 5th and 6th grade, and my daughter got her license last winter, and was 7 at the time.

      It is disappointing how the "do it yourself" trend is going down, even in the nearly 20 short years that I've been a ham. Heathkit was pretty much gone when I got started, and even Ramsey only has a few QRP rigs now. They still had full FM transceiver kits at one point. I always wanted one, but $150 wasn't feasible for a pre-teen with only an allowance for an income. There are still kits out there, but there aren't too many "beginner" level ham-related kits. Antennas are the main DIY components on the typical ham shack now, and many people tend to buy them at extremely overinflated prices anyway.

      I think the biggest area now that hams are pushing the envelope in is the Software Defined Radio (SDR) field. Some of the work coming from the guys (and gals) working on these things is simply amazing. The ability to see an entire band in a "waterfall" display and simply click on a signal to tune it is neat. Then to be able to apply software-based filters to clean up an otherwise unreadable signal simply blows me away. Then using a 4 antenna vertical array, the SDR can apply a directional pattern to it by adjusting the phase on each antenna input to refine the signal even further.

      I'm working on teaching my daughter the basics of electronics as I feel it is a good foundation to learn more advanced topics later on. She's helped me build my antennas, and has helped me solder together a few small projects I've built.

      Yeah, model rocketry... That brings back some good memories!

    119. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about (except maybe the touch on D-Star, which only the voice coded falls under what you said).

      By the way, even a recent slashdot article shows that ham radio is still a growing hobby.

      The radio waves are not full of old conservative men and if you had a license you'd understand that. There are people of all types, backgrounds, ages, and views. Yes, some people just buy off-the-shelf equipment, but plenty of people continue build their own equipment.

    120. Re:report it to the fcc by treeves · · Score: 1

      Points about microwave ovens are all true, but almost certainly irrelevant to the OP. No one is using a microwave oven for 90 minutes every night. Heck , most things people heat up in microwave ovens take little more than 90 *seconds*.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    121. Re:report it to the fcc by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Your idea's intrigue me and I would like to be directed to your HowTo-site so I might order a pre-built kit.

    122. Re:report it to the fcc by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      2.4GHz wireless phones could do this, and other devices including Bluetooth. Reference this past Slashdot post: http://slashdot.org/articles/00/06/15/1833245.shtml

    123. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.girltech.com/electronics-imMe.aspx Imagine going to their website and trying to find a support number, asking how to turn it into a spectrum analyzer.

    124. Re:report it to the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is black, if you prefer ;)

    125. Re:report it to the fcc by srinathhs · · Score: 1

      wouldn't it be nice to login and lock the original user out :)

    126. Re:report it to the fcc by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 1

      That is so wrong... yet I'm laughing hysterically... and so tempted to try it...

      --
      Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
  2. Change channel / Try Kismet by originalhack · · Score: 4, Insightful


    First thing to try is setting your AP to a different channel.

    If that doesn't set you right, get a USB Wifi device that is supported under Linux and fire up Kismet and identify any strong signals nearby.

    1. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this. In ddwrt you have an option to see all other AP and the channels threw broadcast at. I set mine's to two channels apart and it was a difference as night and day. My first clue to the original culprit was that the speed would go back to normal after my neighbor went to sleep..

    2. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by mysidia · · Score: 0, Troll

      Imagine if your neighbor tried that with TV...

      <PersonA> Your interfering with my television during prime time..

      <Neighbor> Pls Nevermind the interference.

      <PersonA> But I want to watch Fox news and you're completely scrambling it.....

      <Neighbor> Feh. Then go watch CNN instead, it's on a different channel and will probably work. Problem solved.

    3. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by PrecambrianRabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

      But I want to watch Fox news and you're completely scrambling it.....

      *confused* But I thought Fox news was already scrambled!

    4. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Except that's an invalid metaphor. Using a different WiFi channel would still give you the same access. It's more like arguing over parking spaces.

    5. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Cylix · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can do the same issue with dd-wrt, but that only if the signal also conforms to the 802.11b specification.

      A burst of noise or device using the spectrum differently will not display using such techniques. The spectrum is open and there are a number of protocols today that rely on those frequencies.

      I had a friend with a 2.4ghz phone which would completely and utterly destroy our wireless reception.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.. Hypothetical example: I have no control over my next door neighbor's unsecured WiFi is using channel 6.

      I suppose I could go knock on his door and ask him to switch channel selection or change to 802.11a, but that would kind of give away the fact i'm tapping into it.......

    7. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Vectormatic · · Score: 1

      unsecured wifi sometimes also leaves the router admin pw as the default, a few guesses and your in...

      I actually saw this at my moms place a few years back. Her own internet was being a terrible bitch and we needed to get online, so i found an unsecured wifi from one of the neighbours, closer inspection showed the router was also wide-open, so i poked around a bit... i dont quite remember, but i think i even improved a few settings...

      anyway, do you have any control where your neighbour parks his pickup trick which you sometimes secretely hitch a ride on?

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    8. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is assuming that the interfering signal is something other than noise.

      Do you someone around that does a lot of welding? That's a lot of sparks flying around and it causes interference. Bad microwaves does too, but considering the time it's unlikely.

      Radar is also a factor. Commercial and military communication as well.

      Of course - it may also be someone's TV that's radiating interference. Especially old TV:s can be suspect. And other older equipment since RF filters may degrade by time - or the fact that they weren't tested for interference at the high frequencies that WiFi are using. 2.4GHz was something very exotic during the 70's.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are all assuming it's another Wifi device.

      By the exact timing, it sounds more like ordinary unexciting EM interference.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by hpa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed... I put my 2.4 GHz AP on channel 1, because *all* the APs I could see from my house was on channels 6 and higher. It turns out to be a reason for that -- something that *isn't* 802.11 is interfering with the lower channels. Bumping it to channel 11 and all the interference problems went away.

      Wifi operates in the ISM bands - the scrap heaps of the radio spectrum. There is tons of crap, and 802.11 is just a small part of that.

    11. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      his card actually support capture on Linux (not on Windows)

      So live cd and start airodump, and hope the overpowering signal is actually wifi, else he won't see anything. if it's wifi, it's easy to track down even without triangulation.
      Just check the signal quality with a laptop as you move until you get close to the source.

      but to interfere it must be a very high power signal, so i'm doubting this is the direct problem. something to test this easily, is to change the wifi channel completely, eg if you're channel 1 go to channel 11. that is because no device is using such a wide frequency range (unless its some custom crap running at a few whats just made to kill all wifi channels of course, but that's unlikely too).

      finally, the most likely issue is something like that:
      there's some electronic system, heating, alarm, whatever, very nearby the router/access point that emit a strong enough signal (it doesnt even need to be on the same frequency range if its close enough) which enables at this time of the day..

      or.. someone injects deauthentication packets to annoy you at this time everyday lately ;P

    12. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are a lot of things that can hose WiFi. It is unlicensed spectrum. I wouldn't be surprised if you hooked up a wireless camera receiver in the frequency range of your wifi and got a peek inside somebody's house.

    13. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Not really, I'd be more like 'Hello, I was having network issues, and as part of that I ran a network discovery scan and found that you were running your network on channel 6. As the neighbor on the other side uses 11 the guy behind me uses 1, I'm wondering if, since you're at the corner, you could use 11 too?'

      You don't need to tap into a network in order to be able to see the network.

      I did pretty much this in a dormitory setting for a friend - 20 networks visible, pretty much evenly between 1, 7, and 11.

      His router was on 1, which had the most(if barely), but also had the strongest of the other networks. I ended up sticking him on 9. Problems went away.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    14. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      considering the time it's unlikely.

      Microwave popcorn.

    15. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by __aaelyr464 · · Score: 1

      Using any channel other than 1, 6, or 11 could increase your chances of interference. You will notice that in most corporate settings, those three channels are used as there is no overlap between them. For a visual understanding of that, see this link.

      Placing your friend on channel 9 may have helped mostly because it stayed away from channel 1, where you said the majority of 'strong' networks were--but you were still susceptible to interference from channels 6 and 11.

    16. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      how do you find out the channel of others' networks?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    17. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by uniquegeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sometimes the software on a pc or device shows it when you select a Wireless Network. Sometimes it doesn't.

      Network Stumbler does.

    18. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by cjb658 · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. Download a Ubuntu Live CD.
      2. Open a terminal and type "sudo apt-get install aircrack-ng"
      3. If aircrack-ng installs successfully (you may need to connect an ethernet cable to get an internet connection), type "sudo airmon-ng start wlan0".
      4. Type in "sudo airodump-ng mon0" and you'll get a nice list of all the wireless access points in your area (even the hidden ones).
      Aircrack-ng (and airodump-ng) documentation can be found here.

      You can also try NetStumbler, which runs on Windows, but it much less powerful.

    19. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      considering the time it's unlikely.

      Microwave popcorn.

      Exactly what volume of popcorn are we talking if it takes 1.5 hours to pop in the microwave?

    20. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Serial popcorn killer FTW!!! :p

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    21. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Placing your friend on channel 9 may have helped mostly because it stayed away from channel 1

      Maybe, but it's not like 6 and 11 were that far behind. Putting him on 6 or 11 would have gained me maybe a DB of SNR.

      I figure that by putting him on 9, at least the interference would be different between the high and low. It seems to have worked.

      My personal choice would have been to get him into the 5 GHz band, but his router wasn't capable of that.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    22. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      inSSIDer does as well if you use Vista/7. NetStumbler doesn't run that well on 7 or Vista in my experience. Maybe it's changed recently.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    23. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My parents had a wireless phone that killed the wifi every time it rang.

      I changed the wifi channel. Problem solved.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    24. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what volume of popcorn are we talking if it takes 1.5 hours to pop in the microwave?

      One cubicle?

    25. Re:Change channel / Try Kismet by SatanClauz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, microwaves will do it for sure. an "open" hallway on campus with multiple level balconies. lunch time was HORRIBLE because of the varying type/brand/quality of microwaves everywhere. Oddly enough, after normal working hours I would have 0 problems ;)

  3. It could be any number of things. by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Informative
    I had a neighbor that had an old 2.4 GHz cordless phone that used to interfere with my WiFi signal.

    Once he got a 5 GHz phone all was well.

    Long story, short: lots of things use the 2.4 GHz spectrum. It may not have anything to do with WiFi.

    1. Re:It could be any number of things. by fake_name · · Score: 5, Informative

      We had a lot of trouble with wireless disruptions around our office - I eventually bought a Wi-Spy (http://www.metageek.net/) for $99 because the productivity loss was getting bad enough to justify the cost of the hardware.

      Running a spectrum analyzer, and moving around the office (spending a few minutes in each spot ) was a great way to see what interference was where, and it's great to be able to "see" the 2.4Ghz spectrum instead of just look at what wireless networks exist.

    2. Re:It could be any number of things. by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bluetooth is known to cause WiFi interference and degradation. Perhaps some Bluetooth-device is in use.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    3. Re:It could be any number of things. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Baby monitors are another. Could be being used between when baby goes to bed and when the adults go to bed or something. You'd know if your neighbors have kids though :)

      I wonder how precise the 8:30-10:00 statement was... if it's exactly 8:30-10:00 then it sounds like some equipment running on a timer. If it's approximate then it's more likely to be a human...

    4. Re:It could be any number of things. by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so what did you find? Any useful lessons for us?

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    5. Re:It could be any number of things. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Maybe a serious wii addict their controllers are bluetooth.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:It could be any number of things. by AngryNick · · Score: 1

      One of my machines, a Mac, had a habit of dropping its wireless connection whenever the Wii called up to the Nintendo mothership...about every 9 minutes.

    7. Re:It could be any number of things. by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      I've heard claims (mostly unsubstantiated) that Wii and other gaming consoles can cause interference.

    8. Re:It could be any number of things. by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      My stereo receiver came with a USB dongle that lets it act as a sound card. Runs at 2.4GHz. Completely screws with wi-fi.

      Many wireless "listen to your audio in another room" transmitters run at 2.4GHz. Completely screws with wi-fi.

      Baby monitors, phones, home security systems... 2.4GHz is a ghetto. The first thing to do is to try other wi-fi channels and see if you can find a clear one. If that doesn't work, check the surrounding area for interfering devices. Start with your own home; if you have any wireless devices in your house, turn them off and see if the problem goes away. Next, knock on the neighbors' doors and ask them to do the same. With luck you'll find the culprit.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    9. Re:It could be any number of things. by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Woot for metageek!

  4. Don't bet on it being wifi. by BabaChazz · · Score: 5, Informative

    An associate of mine reported the same issue. In his case it was a failed security lamp that was trying to come on at sunset and failing; it was only when the ballast gave up after an hour and a half that his wifi -- and his AM radio -- came back. Note that many security lights are sodium arc or mercury vapor arc; not much is as hard on RF in general as a big fat arc.

    1. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by e4g4 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is very interesting - I've been experiencing extreme wifi interference issues since I moved to my new place (about a year ago) in Brooklyn. My neighborhood is not known as one of the more crime free boroughs in the city, and presumably as a result of that reputation, the neighboring building's backyard has an always-on sodium light at the ground floor (of the brightness and sickening color of your typical street-side sodium lamp). My bedroom (also on the ground floor, facing the backyard) experiences the worst effects of a very obvious latent interference in the area, that is lesser (but not gone) in the 5GHz range, but renders wifi nearly unusable in the 2.4GHz band (with the added interference of several other networks in that frequencey range close by - though there is 3 channel free band). I wonder if the sodium lamp is the issue...

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Get a BB gun and find out.

      I suppose you just just ask your neighbor to kill the light for a night or two, but that isn't any fun.

    3. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by BabaChazz · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the BB gun will not stop the interference unless you somehow manage to short out the bulb and pop the breaker. Instead you'll get a free-air arc...

      It's much more likely to tell the tale if you ask the neighbor.

    4. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that normal air at a higher pressure would prevent the arc from... arcing.

      It would also overheat the elements and burn them out, should my guess not be correct.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do some science! BB gun science!

    6. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      This is very interesting - I've been experiencing extreme wifi interference issues since I moved to my new place (about a year ago) in Brooklyn. My neighborhood is not known as one of the more crime free boroughs in the city, and presumably as a result of that reputation, the neighboring building's backyard has an always-on sodium light at the ground floor (of the brightness and sickening color of your typical street-side sodium lamp). My bedroom (also on the ground floor, facing the backyard) experiences the worst effects of a very obvious latent interference in the area, that is lesser (but not gone) in the 5GHz range, but renders wifi nearly unusable in the 2.4GHz band (with the added interference of several other networks in that frequencey range close by - though there is 3 channel free band). I wonder if the sodium lamp is the issue...

      Staying in Phuket recently, I noticed the wifi at my hotel would drop out around 6:30 at night. The first thing I noticed is that everyone in that street turned on their lights and neon signs around the same time. Given how shoddily wiring is done in Thailand this may have been the cause.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had exactly that problem. Our ADSL was cutting out at almost the same time every day in the evening, just as it was going dark. In fact, it was cutting out about 1-2 minutes later each day. After a couple of weeks of looking at the possible causes we noticed that a floodlight on a car showroom forecourt about 50 yards away was flickering badly - the ADSL would drop *exactly* at the time the lights came on on the forecourt.

      Quick pop across to talk to the manager of the showroom and the light was quickly fixed and the problems went away. Unfortunately, if the manager was unwilling to fix the problem then I doubt that there was anything that we could have done other than just do without Internet when it was dark (or after midnight when the floodlights went off anyway).

    8. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blah blah blah. brooklyn, huh? i bet your interference is coming from 300 ironically named airport extremes in your apartment building.

    9. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Not that I actually know much about this other than that tracking down interference sources is a black art. But I would point out that the interference could be knocking out the signal at either the router or the computer, and I wouldn't overlook moving the router to a different location as a possible solution.

      I think what I'd probably try is:

      Try running the computer next to the router. If the connection stays up, move away until it doesn't. Then try different channels and find which works best. If there is still a problem try reorienting the router. It's reception pattern is almost certainly directional. If the problem is interference at the router, maybe the interference source can be put into a null in the reception pattern. Finally, try moving the router as far as is feasible.

      Other than those things, it may be necessary to spend some money. And spending money, even switching to a different band entirely, won't guarantee a solution.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    10. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by Kizeh · · Score: 1

      Wireless cameras are also notorious for hosing WiFi.

    11. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem. The BB gun did not work on my router... just put a small hole in it.

    12. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by Five+Bucks! · · Score: 1

      But if you shoot the light that was installed to keep people from shooting guns then all hell will... wait... recursive light shooting! ARGH

      --
      52 52'23" W 47 32'07" N
    13. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by torgis · · Score: 1

      You know what else uses high pressure sodium lamps? Indoor greenhouses and grow rooms. One of your neighbors might have a 1000w HPS light on a timer to grow some medicinal herbs. Just sayin...

    14. Re:Don't bet on it being wifi. by bikeidaho · · Score: 1

      If this was the case it would probably be running on an 12 or 18 hour cycle. Only cheap digital ballasts cause this interference and some older magnetic ballasts. I would look for a microwave or some other BIG electric motor.

  5. Try it the low tech way... by javaguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...put a sign in your front window or building lobby asking if anyone else is having the same problem, or uses electrical equipment only between those times. Make it a friendly note, with smiles, rainbows, and unicorns, so you don't offend anyone or make it look like a witch. As a bonus you get to know your neighbours.

  6. microwave ovens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you or neighbors cooking with microwaves during that time? They leak like mad. Try using channel 1.

    1. Re:microwave ovens by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      That reminds me, welding will bork things up spectacularly. Not likely in this case, I think, but worth a mention.

    2. Re:microwave ovens by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      microwaves ... They leak like mad

      Yeah they do, particularly the older ones. I remember working with a friend/coworker of mine at (another) friend's apartment, where, whenever the (15+ year old) microwave was running, would take out all wifi connectivity in the 2 AP powered, small, 2 bedroom New York apartment. It was maddening.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  7. Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by millisa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are finding your fancy wifi card isn't supported by stumbler and other free channel overlap type tools . . . why not buy a cheap wifi card to use with those apps? You could always drop it back on craigslist/ebay (or even return it to the store claiming it doesn't match your curtains).

    1. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 0, Troll

      Good idea, only your over looking that for some people even a $5 dollar card can be out of their budget, even for the time needed to resell it. Likely not the case this time but not everyone has spare money to throw a problem.

    2. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Alfa 1000mW 1W 802.11b/g USB Wireless WiFi Network Adapter With Original Alfa Screw-On Swivel 9dBi Rubber Antenna works great for me for $35. Using kismet or your choice of promiscuous sniffing tool.

      If the interference is 2.4-based 802.11b/g, you'll be able to find it. Won't help you any with 802.11n, which may just be your problem. Might be someone's 2.4GHz phone. Might be someone who microwaves a bunch of stuff. 2.4GHz is a swap free-for-all.

    3. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      If $5 is out of your budget, you are doing something wrong.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If $5 is out of his budget, then a call to the FCC is his *only* option. Short of waiting until the interference and cutting power to his neighbors one-by-one, it's the only free way to address it. And trust me, that one gets you in trouble. Used to be you could cut the phone line first, but no, cellular everywhere...

    5. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      Might be someone who microwaves a bunch of stuff

      If someone is microwaving stuff for an hour and a half everyday you'll be able to spot them without using any signal detectors...

    6. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      ... a call to the FCC is his *only* option...

      I wouldn't count on the FCC to solve your problems. Title 47 CFR Part 15 .19.3 (labeling requirements) states:

      This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't count on the FCC to solve your problems.

      You said it yourself:
      "(1) This device may not cause harmful interference,"

      They do come out and investigate complaints of something not meeting part 15 rules.

    8. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      They do come out and investigate complaints of something not meeting part 15 rules.

      When it interferes with a licensed service or a non-part 15 device.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    9. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Is that a fact or an opinion? It is presented like a fact, but it disagrees with my experience.

    10. Re:Buy a cheap supported wifi card? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Well actually it agrees with my experience. I've worked with the FCC to resolve some interference disputes (Malfunctioning pager transmitters use to be a huge problem in my area).

      They do prioritize based on services being interfered with.

      I find it hard to justify money being spent to find out why an individual's part 15 device which operates in an ISM band is being interfered with.

      If a whole neighborhood was affected then that's a different story because that means that the spurious interference is possibly strong enough to warrant an investigation. However if you're the only one getting interfered then there is insufficient evidence that harmful interference is taking place.

      Now if an individual went through the trouble of finding the source of the interference, then the FCC will be glad to look into it. However the parent post inferred that calling the FCC would alleviate the need to find the source of the interference.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  8. I have the same problem in the AM by TyroneShoe · · Score: 1

    I have a similar problem in the morning with my WiFi over a similar time period (1 to 2 hours). I considered that it could be interference from a rogue AP as well and tried shuffling around the channels my AP was broadcasting on but with no luck. Another thought was that there are high-tension power lines near me and perhaps (100% speculation) that higher load in the AM causes some kind of RF interference... Ultimately, I purchased a Netgear WNR3700 which is a dual-band A/B/G/N AP and that sort of solved my problem; my 5Ghz wireless N access in unaffected by the issue so the only PC in the house impacted is my wife's laptop which only can do 2.4Ghz wireless-N

    1. Re:I have the same problem in the AM by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The EM from those power lines is going to me much lower in frequency, AFAIK.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  9. That's weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's the same time I microwave up all my hotpockets for the next day's raiding Ice Crown Citadel...

    1. Re:That's weird... by Bai+jie · · Score: 1

      I love a man that comes to raids prepared. Flasks, Potions and Hot Pockets!

    2. Re:That's weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure would have to eat a lot of hot-pockets. Either that or you like badly burned hot-packets!,

    3. Re:That's weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i lol'd irl at that one

  10. Any more info? by blackicye · · Score: 1

    Are you using Wireless a/b/g or Draft-n?

    Are you still able to view broadcasted SSIDs?

  11. define "dies" by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    What trace information do you have? For example I run netbsd on my wife router and if the wifi interface goes down or stops working I would look in /var/log for trace information.

    How close are your neighbors? Do you live on a farm? Or in a block of small apartments? Maybe you have a channel space issue.

    1. Re:define "dies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      For example I run netbsd on my wife router

      NetBSD...it really does run on anything!

      Did you get your wife from Stepford?

    2. Re:define "dies" by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its not good just previewing you have to read as well.

    3. Re:define "dies" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Its not good just previewing you have to read as well.

      that's proofread, you jackass

    4. Re:define "dies" by smart_ass · · Score: 2, Funny

      For example I run netbsd on my wife router and if the wifi interface goes down or stops working I would look in /var/log for trace information.

      Your wife router ... come on ... Slashdotters are bad ... but you maried your F-ing router?

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
  12. Use your local ham radio club by crath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Talk to someone in your local ham radio club and see if they have a member with a spectrum analyzer and a directional antenna. Have them come out to the house and do some direction finding to determine who is transmittin on the WiFi freqeuncies in your neighbourhood.

    Be polite. Ask nicely. Buy them pizza and beer to say thank you.

    Hams are nice guys and gals and they will probably be happy to help out.

    The ARRL website can probably provide a contact for your local ham radio club.

    1. Re:Use your local ham radio club by bezenek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First try what is suggested by BabaChazz in his comment above and is what most Hams would do to start. Listen for the noise on an AM radio. You do not want FM, as one of the characteristics of FM is to block this noise.

      Take your (preferably hand-held) radio and tune it somewhere on the dial where there is no station. Then, you can try moving it around your computer to hear all of the RF interference your motherboard, etc. are giving off. If you cannot hear this noise, something is wrong with the radio--be sure it is set to AM. :-)

      Leave the radio on, and you might hear the noise start at the time your WiFi drops. If you do not, the interference is not covering the AM frequencies (an arc will cover everything), and it is probably time to call in a Ham.
      It is likely you will hear it.

      If you hear it, you can walk around inside and outside your house listening for where the noise gets stronger. Often this will be tracked down to a phone pole or something else.

      Once you find it, contact the appropriate person (electric distribution supplier, city, etc.) Convincing someone to fix a problem like this is not always easy.

      -Todd

      --
      Omne ignotum pro magnifico.
    2. Re:Use your local ham radio club by adolf · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      I haven't met a ham yet that wasn't a proper thinking sort of fellow, with a willingness to help other folks solve problems (especially if the problems are interesting to them).

      Sometimes, though, it's not something so complicated that outside help is needed.

      I once troubleshot a WiFi link that spanned two buildings, a block or two apart. Things had been stable since we installed it a year or two prior, but suddenly it would drop out completely a few minutes at a time, between 11:45 and 12:30.

      The likely culprit? A leaky microwave oven operated at some nearby business at lunch time. The fix was completely unscientific: We changed channels, and the interference ceased being a problem.

      Perhaps in the case of this particular Ask Slashdot, there is a 2nd-shift worker who tends to nuke their dinner every night when they get home.

      Of course, if it is a microwave and it's nuking the entire band such that the interference cannot be avoided by using a different channel, then the only solution is to find the offending microwave and destroy it. (Ideally, this happens after you and the other affected neighbors pool a few dollars to help buy the person a new microwave, which is a far more sensible approach than complaining to the FCC or somesuch.)

    3. Re:Use your local ham radio club by bitbucketeer · · Score: 1

      i'd go with the spectrum analyzer... if it's a strong enough signal to desense the tuner in his AM radio, it should be pretty easy to find.

    4. Re:Use your local ham radio club by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would add only one detail: tune the AM radio up near the "high end" of the radio spectrum, around 1500 or so. That's the part of the AM spectrum that's closest to 2400 Mhz, and thus most likely to pick up the interference.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:Use your local ham radio club by emeraldd · · Score: 1

      Call it a "fox hunt" and they'll see it as challenge :P

    6. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      If you track it down to a pole of some type I think it might be quite simple to get them to fix it. Call whoever owns the box and tell them you saw sparks/smoke/loud sparks and bangs coming from their box.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    7. Re:Use your local ham radio club by APL+bigot · · Score: 4, Informative

      It may in fact be a ham that is legally operating in the 2.4GHz band. Hams are licensed users of this spectrum, and have priority. They could be causing the interference (if in fact they are), and if so you just have to live with it, if it can't be resolved. Hams are also protected from interference (by law) from the unlicensed users of the spectrum.

      And by the way, end users increasing the power output of a WiFi transmitter is not a good idea. It can cause interference on nearby spectrum, and increased noise levels in the band, which can defeat the purpose of the increase in the first place. This is not something that should be hacked.

      --
      Heisenberg may have been here.
    8. Re:Use your local ham radio club by bezenek · · Score: 4, Informative

      A quick clarification: The top of the AM dial (around 1500) is 1500kHz, or 1.5MHz. This is not close to the 2400MHz, or 2.4GHz at which WiFi operates.

      The ability to identify the origin of the interference using an AM radio relies on the fact that the interference is produced from a source (often an electrical spark or arc) which generates RF noise on the entire spectrum. The spark plugs in car engines are a notorious cause of this sort of interference. If the spark plug wiring in a car is not shielded properly, you will hear a whining sound on an AM radio which changes pitch as the engine RPM changes.

      AM radios happen to be easy to find and are very good at "hearing" the noise produced by an arc. If the noise is something like a microwave oven, which produces RF energy only at about 2.4GHz, then the AM radio will not help you find the problem.

      I hope this helps to clarify the issues.

      -Todd

      p.s. As an interesting experiment. If you have WiFi and a microwave oven in your house/apartment, start downloading a large file. Look at the download rate (300kB/sec. or whatever). Then, start the microwave and look at the download rate. Mine drops to about 10-20kB/sec., because the microwave interferes with the WiFi signal.

      --
      Omne ignotum pro magnifico.
    9. Re:Use your local ham radio club by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What, are they microwaving a turkey?

      (the question posed states it goes down for about 90 minutes)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Amateur are a Secondary User of the band and must accept interference from the industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio users.

    11. Re:Use your local ham radio club by adolf · · Score: 1

      (the question states that it goes down between two measures of time, about 90 minutes apart -- not that it is down for that entire period.)

    12. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, this is what radio amateurs are having to put up with from ethernet-over-powerline (PLT) devices. When one of those fires up, pretty much the entire HF band becomes unusable for a large area, anything up to quarter of a mile. New, high-speed PLT adaptors flatten everything up to VHF - including air band.

      Think carefully before buying an ethernet-over-power adaptor. If the HF bands get too hard to use because of PLT, we might have to switch to running hundreds of watts on 2.4 and 5.8GHz...

    13. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, we have priority, but we're not pricks. If someone came to my house to ask if my radio equipment is causing WiFi signal dropping from area houses, of course I'd be happy to help by solving the problem. Helping my neighbours change the WiFi channels or installing directional indoor antennas for them ($10 from DealExtreme) could help in this issue...

    14. Re:Use your local ham radio club by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, my apologies.

      Still. It's odd that it's at particular times, not "around 8:30"

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:Use your local ham radio club by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      that would hardly make any difference since 1500khz is still so far from wifi's 2400mhz.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    16. Re:Use your local ham radio club by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      p.s. As an interesting experiment. If you have WiFi and a microwave oven in your house/apartment, start downloading a large file. Look at the download rate (300kB/sec. or whatever). Then, start the microwave and look at the download rate. Mine drops to about 10-20kB/sec., because the microwave interferes with the WiFi signal.

      yeah but what happens if my original, no interference speed is 10-20kbytespersecond? i guess this is why i dont see any kind of interference. its already so slow that there's nothing to interfere with.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    17. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. Try that in the real world and you'll just find yourself in arguments with a bunch of scooter-bound fatasses about how computers are bad because echolink is not a mode or a radio.
      Hams are useless and counterproductive. Get your own gear and don't waste your time. Besides, you really expect the hams to tell you if the source of your interference is another ham?
      They'll lie to you. They're like the radio mall cops.

      The sooner we get all the hams off OUR airwaves the better.

    18. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way my building is set up, I am necessarily a long way away from my router. I have a range extender on order, but:

      I have had a bit of fun when heating up a plate of food and watching a video or something. Every time the microwave emitter powers up, Rx speeds fall to 0 and the video runs out of buffer and stops. Once the microwave emitter turns off, Rx rates jump back up and the video begins playing again. Rinse and repeat a few times a minute.

    19. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH NO! Someone is doing something useful with radio waves instead of my usual analog bullshit!

      Cry me a river. Here's the world's smallest violin, playing just for you.
      If these devices function as a wideband ham-jammer then I am having my entire family buy one right now.
      It's progress! Get out of the way or get run over! (And I will enjoy running your fat, worthless, hoveround-bound ass over!)

    20. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an interesting experiment. If you have WiFi and a microwave oven in your house/apartment, start downloading a large file. Look at the download rate (300kB/sec. or whatever). Then, start the microwave and look at the download rate. Mine drops to about 10-20kB/sec., because the microwave interferes with the WiFi signal.

      Here is another one. Put your cell phone in the microwave, and close the door. DON'T TURN THE MICROWAVE ON. After a few seconds, your cell phone should say, "no signal," or "out of network," etc. If your cell phone still has signal after 10 seconds, it's time to get a new microwave. The housing of your microwave is no longer acting as an effective faraday cage, and is leaking dangerous amounts of radiation.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    21. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the "whine" in an automobile's AM radio comes from the AC electricity generated by the car's alternator, which tends to find its way into all the electrical wiring in the vehicle due to low-quality suppression/filtering circuits. Diodes in the alternator turn this AC into half-wave rectified DC, which still contains visible traces of the original sine waves.

      Unshielded spark plugs generate a "pop" sound, with a popping rate that depends on engine speed. At high engine speeds, it tends to turn into a low-pitch "buzz", but not a high-pitch "whine".

    22. Re:Use your local ham radio club by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I've heard from some DD-WRT-using friends bragging about how they cranked up the radio power on their router, and read just as many online 'hacking guides' on how to crank up your power for 'better wi-fi reception'. I run Tomato firmware specifically for two reasons: static DHCP and reducing my WiFi radio power. There's no need to broadcast beyond the walls of my relatively small apartment.

    23. Re:Use your local ham radio club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have WiFi and a microwave oven in your house/apartment, start downloading a large file. Look at the download rate (300kB/sec. or whatever). Then, start the microwave and look at the download rate. Mine drops to about 10-20kB/sec., because the microwave interferes with the WiFi signal.

      I actually had that same problem recently. I would put something in the microwave (which is about 30 ft from here) and come back to find my wireless signal dropped. I remedied this by changing the channel on the router, which changed the frequency just enough to not interfere.

    24. Re:Use your local ham radio club by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "I've heard from some DD-WRT-using friends bragging about how they cranked up the radio power on their router"

      Careful doing that though. I killed the wireless radio on my linksys bumping up the power. It worked for a few minutes and then died and never came back.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    25. Re:Use your local ham radio club by johnshirley · · Score: 1

      I would agree wholeheartedly with this recommendation. As a ham myself, I can say that many hams would very much enjoy the opportunity to solve a radio-related mystery like this for the public.

      Here's the cool thing: if a ham determines that the source of interference also happens to interfere in any way whatsoever with ham radio communications, then the FCC will take notice and will compel the responsible party to correct their systems. The upside is that while the potentially-affected licensed services get fixed (ham radio), so do the unlicensed services (wifi). That is to say, messing with ham communications is bad. There are many cases where hams have had the FCC compel even electric companies to make needed changes and repairs to their systems. Of course, this may not be the case, but it doesn't hurt to investigate it.

      We'll even track the problem down for free. Of course, like you said, pizza and beer are good, too.

  13. Hey Nicros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd help you buddy, but every night between 8:30 and 10:00pm I'm working on my microwave disruptor beam. If it happens any other time, let me know and I'll be glad to pop over and take a look.

    1. Re:Hey Nicros by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'd help you buddy, but every night between 8:30 and 10:00pm I'm working on my microwave disruptor beam. If it happens any other time, let me know and I'll be glad to pop over and take a look."

      Mike, that you?

      In all seriousness, I knew a guy up in Alaska that was trying to do exactly that.

      He lived on some undeveloped property, raised pigs and collected old cars--his neighbor prided himself on his carefully manicured yard. They did not get along. Things got tense until one day the neighbor called the cops on him during a BBQ...and the war started.

      One day, I'm over at his place and he takes out this finely-crafted, solid brass gizmo with all sorts of gears and worm screws in it, about 4 inches to a side. Barely concealing his excitement, he explained that he got it from a buddy that used to work at the local Airforce base, and that it was used by aircraft landing in the dark or on aircraft carriers. It was the core of a device he was constructing--a microwave cannon...to be used in the war.

      Apparently he had managed to obtain a device that directed microwaves into a tight, adjustable beam. I guess it was used as part of a microwave guidance system for aircraft. Anyways, he had also had a large section of copper pipe silvered and polished on the inside and had fitted a microwave generator from a commercial-grade microwave oven onto the device. Amazingly, the generator fit PERFECTLY into the beam focuser, almost as if it was Destiny guiding his hands (or the industry has standards for such things).

      I moved out of the state before he finished it. As far as I know, his girlfriend had convinced him not to finish it. To be honest, the guy was starting to scare me as I began to think he might actually be on to something usable for it's intended purpose.

      I told him that if it actually worked, and he settled matters with his neighbor in a more civilized manner, he could always mount the thing on a lazy-susan, put it in the middle of his yard, get a clock motor to spin it slowly in circles, and he could simply turn it on to mow his yard. Flatest mow-job in town.

  14. Could be a lot of things by taustin · · Score: 1

    During a remodel of one of my employer's stores, we have trouble with our RF gun (laser scans bar codes, then prints price labels, runs off of 802.11whatever). When I went to troubleshoot it, near as I could figure, the contractors working upstairs has something that was putting out so much RF interference, the gun wouldn't boot because it couldn't read the flash memory soldered to the circuit board. Once the contractors left, it was all back to normal.

    1. Re:Could be a lot of things by APL+bigot · · Score: 1

      we have trouble with our RF gun (laser scans bar codes, then prints price labels, runs off of 802.11whatever).

      Sounds like a cheap, poorly designed product. No shielding, or bypassing of stray RF. A plastic case rather than metal?

      --
      Heisenberg may have been here.
  15. Think Geek is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could try to find it with something like this.
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/89d1/

    1. Re:Think Geek is your friend. by lengau · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just be cheaper at that point to just get a supported (by Kismet/whatever) USB wifi card?

      --
      I really wanted to change my sig to something witty, but all I could come up with is this.
    2. Re:Think Geek is your friend. by EvanED · · Score: 1

      While $50 isn't cheap, it's still a fair bit of money for something that is likely a bit of a longshot. From the description it sounds likely to NOT be other Wi-Fi, so a device that looks for Wi-Fi connections isn't the appropriate tool.

  16. Also, InSSIDer by millisa · · Score: 4, Informative

    inSSIDer
    I've been pretty happy using that to help find the best channel for my WAPs in congested areas. If you really believe it might be a neighbor jumping online from 8:30 to 10, that could help. I haven't yet found a card it doesn't work with under windows (assuming you are running windows...)

    1. Re:Also, InSSIDer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. I have used inSSIDer and the Wi-Spy hardware for a couple years now and they'll get you 99% there. Leave your laptop in a different place each day logging when the interference occurs and you'll start to see lots of great info about it and can zero in on it pretty quickly.

      If you want to quickly and effectively get it sorted out, pony up the couple of bills to do it properly, or pay someone to do it properly. "Change channels" and similar solutions are just cross-your-fingers voodoo without any data to support those decisions.

    2. Re:Also, InSSIDer by noc007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Third this. It's a great app and gives you a simple easy to understand view of the APs that are in range. If it's a bunch of APs turning on at once, you may be able to pick a channel that will work better.

      If it's annoying enough, MetaGeek has their Wi-Spy line of Spectrun Analyzers that will give you a better detailed view of the spectrum and not just a map of the APs in your area.

      If your WiFi card supports 802.11a (5GHz), an investment in a new AP may be the way to go. The 5GHz band isn't utilized as much as the 2.4GHz band and isn't susceptible to interference from microwave ovens. My apartment complex is riddled with APs and no one is using 5GHz. Though if a faulty street light ballast is the culprit, it may put it interference on 5GHz along with a number of other bands as well and your investment in new hardware not effective.

  17. have you tried... by uniquegeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Happens the same whether you're on channel 1, 6, or 11? (the only b/g channels that don't overlap)

    I know in my high-rise apartment, almost everyone is on channel 6, and I wouldn't be surprised if peak usage was mid-evening.

    Did you double-check that some rule didn't accidentally get selected, which filters you out (either in the router interface... of you're using software that has scheduling...)

    If you're using a radio type that is using the 5Ghz channel, someone's old beastly cordless phone might be affecting it too. If you're using a dual-band radio on your router, try using the other band and see what happens.

    Running Wireshark (free) might not tell you what specifically is causing the problem, but you can narrow it down to see if packets are timing out, or getting filtered. Maybe there's traffic you didn't expect to be there? http://www.wireshark.org/download.html

    1. Re:have you tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good start, but you have to understand that most wifi cards and routers only monitor channel 1, 6, and 11. All the other channels are UNMONITORED and OVERLAPPING. In other words, channels 7, 8, 9, and 10 all overlap with channel 11 (and channel 6.) But it gets worse. Wifi works by waiting for a random time, then broadcasting network packets. If it hears another card/router broadcasting, it does not broadcast. However, it only monitors the channel to which it is set. So if someone in your neighborhood is using channel 10, that router is not monitoring channel 11. If you're using channel 11, you're screwed...

      So here's what you need to do. First, make sure that your router is broadcasting on channel 1, 6, or 11. This will keep you on channels which are properly monitored. Then fire up NetStumbler and look for someone broadcasting on an off channel. Then change your channel to avoid your improperly broadcasting neighbor.

    2. Re:have you tried... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Given that it happens at 8:30 for 90 minutes sharp, this doesn't sound like something human-controlled. Look to things that run on a timer, and note that it certainly doesn't sound like other-wifi-interference either.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  18. Triangulate with spectrum analyzer or SNR readings by antiduh · · Score: 1

    You'll need a spectrum analyzer and an 2.4 GHz antenna. First, I'd confirm that it's interference just observing high noise at that time, then I'd start taking measurements around the area. A high gain directional antenna would be helpful, but you can triangulate just by observing the strength of the noise from several spots around your neighborhood, though, you might have trouble with the signal strength varying too much as you move the cable and connectors around. You might be able to do all the same with just the wireless adapter and some software like kismet.

    --
    I haven't failed, I've just found 10,000 ways that don't work -Thomas Edison
  19. inexpensive device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is inexpensive for what your looking for.

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/9558/

  20. hard to solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to work several military trade shows at m last job, bringing in all kinds of weird stuff we were doing with wireless tablets and iphones and junk, just to show off what we could do... would stay up till 3am getting everything looking right, would show up 7:30am to make sure the morning of everything was good to go, then boom 8:30am rolled around and everyone fired up there demo hardware and all wireless in the building stopped working, it was ridiculous, happened at three different shows, we kept buying nicer wifi gear each time and failed miserably, until the 4th show that year and a particular company no showed.
    The next show they were at and sure enough everything came down not just for us but all the booths in the hall and the hotels wifi, it did not take us very long to get a group together and head over there with the convention staff demanding that they shut everything down until they determine which device was the issue.
    They had some very unhappy phb's screaming about ruining there day, but we didn't care, i got my 125 dollar dinner and it was all good.

  21. Cordless phones by Dan+B. · · Score: 4, Informative

    I will add my 2c and say it is the increased usage of cordless 2.4GHz phones during those hours. Some of the (cheap) units don't behave particularly well with WiFi and I've personally seen just one phone cause a complete outage of all WiFi in a house.

    Chances are that one of your neighbours with a teenage daughter bought some cheap but funky looking cordless phone off eBay and uses it every night during your outage window.

    --
    Dan. -- So what if it's spelt wrong, nobody's perfect
    1. Re:Cordless phones by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      My phones and microwave don't tend to cause problems, but my Aspire One netbook will shut off an XBox360 controller when I do a file transfer. Could be a flaw in the design or in the build.

    2. Re:Cordless phones by noidentity · · Score: 1

      We used to have a single WiFi access point for three duplexes, and I'd have trouble getting a signal when my cordless phone was in use. Switched the WiFi channel around (I believe up to 11) and no more interference.

  22. Go 802.11n by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

    Give up. The 2.4GHz bands are hopelessly cluttered. Adopt 802.11n before your neighbor does.

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    1. Re:Go 802.11n by GSloop · · Score: 4, Informative

      You realize that N doesn't spec frequency, right?

      802.11n can run in 5Ghz spectrum, but can also run in 2.4 spectrum. So, simply saying "use N" doesn't mean anything in terms of frequency.

      In fact, most of the "consumer-grade" 802.11n equipment is 2.4Ghz exclusively.

      ---
      I'd mostly agree that 5Ghz spectrum will be less cluttered, but I'd also guess that decent equipment using the tech in the N standard will do a lot better in 2.4 than b/g will. Multiple spacial streams, and (when implemented beam-forming) as well as beneficial use of "multi-path" etc will probably make N a lot better in most environments regardless of spectrum.

    2. Re:Go 802.11n by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While this branch of the discussion is technically interesting, I don't think a technical solution that allows pollution to continue unchecked is as appropriate as a political solution of identifying the polluter and requiring him to clean up his act. RF interference, which is probably what is going on, is definitely a form of pollution.

      Is there a railroad yard or industrial site that is using remote controlled locomotives or other RC equipment in the neighborhood? The intensity of interference and the consistent schedule suggests something industrial. Possibly something that is designed to function inside a Faraday cage but the cage has been left open. It can seem awful convenient to inexperienced technicians to just leave the cover plate off so they can more quickly do the scheduled inspections and servicing....

      I think you've got enough evidence to involve the FCC. So long as they are aware of the timing and do the testing when things are on the fritz, they should be able to either rule out RF interference or find the cause fairly quickly.

      --
      Will
    3. Re:Go 802.11n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or possibly a licensed user of the spectrum, who has priority and can (and should) tell Part 15 users to bugger off. Not saying you shouldn't call the FCC, but when they do get around to investigating (and sadly, they won't get in a particular hurry over Part 15 complaints, even if you foxhunt the source and hand them the location) there may still be no recourse but to move on to vacant spectrum in the 5GHz bands.

    4. Re:Go 802.11n by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I think you've got enough evidence to involve the FCC.

      I don't think that the FCC will act on a complaint from an unlicensed user of the 2.4GHz industrial, scientific, and medical band who is required to tolerate interference. The primary purpose of this band is non-communication uses such as microwave heating.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. InSSIDer by whoisrich · · Score: 4, Informative

    Netstumbler did not support my wifi card but came across InSSIDer which is free, and allowed me to easily see channel usage in the neighbourhood. They also sell USB spectrum analyzers for non wifi interference which is what you may need. http://www.metageek.net/products/inssider

    1. Re:InSSIDer by astro · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this tip. The free program is basic but useful,

  24. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is exactly the problem we had with our apartment neighbor's teenage daughter. 8:30pm -10:00 pm fits the high school homework phone schedule.
    A gift of 5 GHz wireless phones to the neighbors (in exchange for their old phones of course) cleaned up our mutual WiFi problems.
    Took the old phones and dumped them into ATT Wireless Store's recycle bin.

  25. Spec analyzer mode on ubiquity equipment/AP by GSloop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get either the USB stick or one of the 2.4Ghz supported AP's from Ubiquiti. [www.ubnt.com]

    The newest firmware supports a Spec analyzer mode - quite good, IMO - and it's not limited to WiFi equipment - anything in the radio spectrum is "seen."

    Their wireless bridges in the 5Ghz spectrum using N tech (dual spacial streams) are seriously killer too - if you've got a wireless bridge, or WISP type situation, it's really, really cheap stuff. I'm likely to end up with 2.4 ghz and 5Ghz units just for spec analysis on the cheap. The units then double as AP's / routers / Bridges. (And at around $100 each, they're pretty awesome - Bullet M5, and Nano Station M5's for example.Find a wireless N bridge that will hold links over miles that are that cheap anywhere else!)

    For around $100 you could have a nice AP and a spec unit in the same hardware. Antenna, unless built into the unit is a bit more difficult/pricey, but still do-able.

    Anyway, I've got a setup using them in a PtMP setup, and though it's not miles, I'm seriously impressed - and the cost factor is simply *insanely* cheap.

    http://www.ubnt.com/

    -Greg

    1. Re:Spec analyzer mode on ubiquity equipment/AP by pcjunky · · Score: 2, Informative

      They sell a USB module for 2.4GHz that costs around $38.

      A friend got us a suriund sound system for our entertainment setup that included wireless rear speakers. Couldn't use hte rear speakers as it clobbered the WIFI. These things transmit a constant stream a really do a good job jamming WIFI. Sounds like something like this may be happening to you. Would explain the time frame.

    2. Re:Spec analyzer mode on ubiquity equipment/AP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - Ubiquiti makes some pretty good radios. I think you can pick up one of these for about 30 bucks: http://ubnt.com/airview

      It doesn't have a lot of the bells and whistles like the more expensive spectrum analyzers but I think it'd help identify your interfering source signal if you pair it up with a directional antenna. Poster above's observation about high school homework hours and 2.4ghz cordless phones was spot on with regards to looking for things that fit the interruption pattern, although I'm not sure a 2.4 cordless in your neighbors house would put out enough power to completely interrupt your signal. I think sillivalley is right on - I'd be on the lookout for something not inter-network related that uses a fair bit of power. Any video senders/security systems/other FHSS ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FHSS ) types of devices in the neighborhood? Neighbor have a wireless speaker system out by the hot tub? I've seen a pair of these low cost wifi video enabled security systems completely tank a wireless access points noise floor from 30 meters or more - but only when people walked by too close and triggered the motion detection. I've also seen a wired camera system use wireless transmitters to bridge the gap between housing units and leasing office - this sender always on and aimed directionally with a money shot right through another of our wireless APs 2.4 access radios. That AP is non-existent for all intensive purposes, its floor somewhere in the -40 range consistently.

      Grab yourself a directional antenna, and if you're nix inclined, go with the Kismit option. If not, try out the Ubiquiti Airview.

    3. Re:Spec analyzer mode on ubiquity equipment/AP by realroymac · · Score: 1

      Greg: It sounds as if you really know Ubiquiti. Have questions on that hardware. Contact?

    4. Re:Spec analyzer mode on ubiquity equipment/AP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the Wiki link showing the functionality:
      http://www.ubnt.com/wiki/index.php?title=Best_channel_using_airview

    5. Re:Spec analyzer mode on ubiquity equipment/AP by GSloop · · Score: 1

      I think my email is in my profile.

      If not, then try junk2009 at sloop period net.

      -Greg

  26. No 1 Suspect: Microwave Oven by rips123 · · Score: 1

    Typical Microwave ovens operate at up to 1000W @ 2.4Ghz. Typical WiFi operates at 20mW @ 2.4Ghz. Yes, a Microwave oven is shielded in a metal box but 20mW is only 1/50,000th of the power of a microwave so even the slighest noisy leak from the microwave is going to look like some serious noise to the WiFi. At my parents place, the range of the WiFi drops in half whenever the Microwave is on.

    1. Re:No 1 Suspect: Microwave Oven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.5 straight hours of microwave use every day? Not likely unless his neighbor is trying to mutate into a superhero. My money is on a cordless phone or a zigbee music system like Sonos.

    2. Re:No 1 Suspect: Microwave Oven by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

      Typical WiFi operates at 20mW @ 2.4Ghz.

      Typical AP power is closer to 50-75mW (17-19dBm) - only low power WiFi sharing devices like MiFi would be as low as 20mW. Also worth remembering that your NIC will typically transmit back at a similar power if able.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    3. Re:No 1 Suspect: Microwave Oven by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      FYI, it's often easier to use decibels to describe power ratios. In your case, 20 mW is also 13dBm (13 decibels relative to 1 mW), and 1000W is 60dBm. Therefore the microwave oven's signal is 47dB stronger than the WiFi signal.

      Rules of thumb: 3dB is approx double the power, 10dB is ten times the power (voltage dB ratios work differently).

      Since dB are additive, you can get a back-of-the-envelope feeling for a dB magnitude using the above rules. 47dB is 4 * 10dB + approx 2 * 3dB. Since 10dB is 10x and 3dB is 2x, that's 10*10*10*10 * 2*2, or between approx 40,000 (46dB) and 80,000 (49dB). The real numbers are
      39,810.7 and 79,432.8 not using the above approximations.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  27. Got an iPhone? by christoofar · · Score: 1

    If you got an iPhone or a Driod, you can get WiFi-Fo-Fum. Go into your router settings and make sure you're broadcasting your SSID and lock on to it on the smartphone. I've found dead spots in my rowhome (3 stories) where there were just Faraday-like dead spots in my house and one was near my basement PC. Repositioned the antenna and all was back to normal. I also can't walk near the spots when I'm using my mobile or the calls cut off, too.

    1. Re:Got an iPhone? by ekgringo · · Score: 1

      This app sounded interesting so I checked the app store for it. Apparently it is no longer available on non-jailbroken iPhones.

    2. Re:Got an iPhone? by plover · · Score: 1

      This app sounded interesting so I checked the app store for it. Apparently it is no longer available on non-jailbroken iPhones.

      Thus, the spirit jailbreak was born. You'll seriously not regret it nearly as much as buying the damn locked down phone in the first place.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Got an iPhone? by bdenton42 · · Score: 1

      There's also Wifi Analyzer on the Droid. http://a.farproc.com/wifi-analyzer Makes a pretty graph of the Wifi channels and what's using them. I had to load it by hand using adb however, as it doesn't appear on AT&T's version of the market.

  28. Part 15 devices... by sillivalley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a Part 15 device, you have to put up with what other devices are doing.

    My first guess would be a non-802.11 device such as a video or audio sender. They can take out many 2.4GHz channels at once, where a microwave oven usually only knocks out a couple.

    One workaround is to go to 5GHz -- you're still under Part 15 and susceptible to interference, but there's less of it, a lot more channels, and you can find a 40 MHz channel for 802.11n.

    Without something that acts like a spectrum analyzer (such as a real spectrum analyzer -- but some modern access points and other 802.11n devices offer spectrum analysis/FFT capabilities), it's going to be difficult to identify your interference source.

    Using a simple reflector such as a parabolic reflector or a corner reflector, you might have a better chance at establishing a direction for your interference source.

    1. Re:Part 15 devices... by darrylo · · Score: 1

      My first guess would be a non-802.11 device such as a video or audio sender. They can take out many 2.4GHz channels at once, where a microwave oven usually only knocks out a couple.

      This, or, as others have said, an old cruddy analog 2.4GHz wireless phone. A microwave is also unlikely due to the long interference period, unless someone is trying to cook everyone around him ....

    2. Re:Part 15 devices... by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      As a Part 15 device, you have to put up with what other devices are doing.

      "You" being the device, yes. The user does not have to put up with it.
      In any case, the other half of the part 15 rule citation is "this device may not cause harmful interference". If the interfering device is subject to part 15, it is clearly not following that rule...

    3. Re:Part 15 devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember there are licensed (ie.NOT part 15) devices out there that operate in at least part of the same spectrum as our WiFi devices. If it's one of them that's hosing things - tough.

    4. Re:Part 15 devices... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > In any case, the other half of the part 15 rule citation is "this device may
      > not cause harmful interference".

      With the unstated caveat that the only interference that counts is interference with non-part 15 uses.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  29. General electrical interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Keep an open mind to ANY device which could be turning on and off during the problem times.
    I also had this problem and after weeks found it to correspond with the watering schedule for my garden - the water pump was on the other side of the wall to my router and was causing the interference.

  30. Finding the source by dgreer · · Score: 1

    Get a radio capable of doing a spectrum analysis a directional antenna (e.g. a yagi or something similar) and a non-directional omni antenna. A connectorized Motorola Canopy would be ideal (but a bit expensive).

    Connect the omni first and take a spectrum analysis before and during the interference period to identify the signature of the interfering signal. Once you know what to look for, switch to the directional and use it to find the direction of the signal. Make sure you keep in mind the reception pattern of your antenna when you're doing this, as a Yagi will have 3 lobes, one larger than the other two so make sure that you've zeroed in the largest lobe on the signal.

    One thing about the signature: You MAY find that the signal "hops" around. Some SCADA systems use such signals, and it's not uncommon for SCADA systems to have a periodic pattern that repeats every 24 hours.

    Oh, and you pretty much have to find this yourself, FCC won't get involved until you can pretty much prove to them that somebody is interfering with you and that they are NOT a licensed user (who likely would have a variance for using higher power than your Part 15 equipment).

    Good luck!

    --
    "I don't think software should necessarily be free ... but if you pay for it, it should work!" - me
    1. Re:Finding the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ubiquti M series product line has a spectrum analyzer built in. They are cheaper than Canopy and the interface looks better.

  31. Try changing the channel in your wireless router. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try changing the channel in your wireless router. Most set to channel 6 by default.

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. possible ISP problem? by tofu2go · · Score: 1

    Are you absolutely certain it is the wifi? It could be your ISP. You didn't mention whether you were on DSL or Cable. I'm on cable, and I know that whenever my ISP resets my dynamic IP, my router locks up and I have to power cycle it. If it is always happening at the same time, it could be your ISP doing something on a regular schedule.

    1. Re:possible ISP problem? by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Possibly, but he DID mention that the LAN works fine and anything wired up doesn't lose connectivity.

    2. Re:possible ISP problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of thing happens to me too, but my router doesn't seem to freak out quite so much ... it resets itself. I lose internet for perhaps 30 seconds and then I am back in business.

    3. Re:possible ISP problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA, moron.

    4. Re:possible ISP problem? by tofu2go · · Score: 1

      i love it when people have to be an ass, but don't have the courage to put their name behind it.

  34. Noisy WIFI by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    I doubt it's noisy transmitter because it's unlikely a WIFI radio will interfere with all channels simultaneously. Make sure you try different channels.

    If you use linux and your card supports packet injection you can use airodump to capture packets and see who is transmitting the most data. You may also be able to walk around with your laptop and find which direction the signal gets stronger.

    1. Re:Noisy WIFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't need packet injection to use airodump. You need the driver to support monitor mode.

    2. Re:Noisy WIFI by HazE_nMe · · Score: 1

      If you use linux and your card supports packet injection you can use airodump to capture packets and see who is transmitting the most data.

      Your card does not need to support packet injection in order to run airodump. You only need packet injection support to inject packets with aireplay while capturing them with airodump on the same interface.

  35. Baby monitors -- evil incarnate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Baby monitors. One of the few devices that can completely trash all wi-fi frequencies in an area, not just for 1-20 minutes like a microwave but for years on end. Especially older models which use an analog signal.

    1. Re:Baby monitors -- evil incarnate by eyrieowl · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's the years on end part which kind of rules that one out, i think. op says it only happens for a couple hours each night. unlikely that's the only time when the baby monitor would be in use....

    2. Re:Baby monitors -- evil incarnate by telemart73 · · Score: 1

      the analogue ones worked in either a 27mhz or 41mhz range, if memory serves. There may have been others later, but i clearly remember the interference they caused in these frequencies with Soviet military transmitters. I could make so many jokes right now about babies saving us from a Soviet invasion (when there were still soviets...) but won't out of respect for common decency...

    3. Re:Baby monitors -- evil incarnate by blakelarson · · Score: 1

      That's the only time when ours is in use --- when we put the baby down at 8:00 until we go to bed at 10:00. He's otherwise in daycare or we are in the room next to his. Simple question, though: got any neighbors with babies?

    4. Re:Baby monitors -- evil incarnate by my_2_cent · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Find your neighbor that puts their baby down to sleep at 8:30 pm and that go to bed themselves at 10 pm. They could be two or three blocks away. Dig out your own older unencrypted baby monitor and monitor it at 8:30 pm. If you hear them speak the baby's name, then you've found your source.

    5. Re:Baby monitors -- evil incarnate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to talk to them using the your own baby monitor, film it and post their scared faces to YouTube.

  36. I had a similar problem by sdavid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it is caused by an analog 2.4 ghz phone, and someone chats during that time period. I had one of those phones and found that when I used it it hosed most of the available channels. Replacing the phone solved the problem and doubtless made my neighbors' lives easier. After a move, the same pattern showed up. The solution was a dual-band router.

  37. Re:Try a Network Monitor by DavidRawling · · Score: 1, Informative

    Summary:

    ... or else my card (Intel Link 1000 BGN) isn't supported. (Netstumbler is an example ...)

    Parent:

    Try using a wireless network monitoring program like ... Net Stumbler for Windows.

    Yes, I know this is slashdot, and we don't read the articles; but is it too much to ask for you to read the freaking SUMMARY before you reply with a useless load of blather?

  38. Wi-Spy Spectrum Analyzer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a Wi-Spy! This does exactly what you ask with helpful pictures and is what I purchased for this.
    http://www.metageek.net/

  39. Check the microwave oven! by johanwanderer · · Score: 1

    Your microwave oven operates on the same frequency as Wifi, and 8:30-10:00pm seems like a likely time for it to be running.

    It's also easy to test :) if you turn it on and your wifi disconnect... bingo, time for a new, less-leaking microwave oven :)

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Check the microwave oven! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? This is the police. We've tracked the interference. It's coming from inside your microwave! Get out of your microwave!

    2. Re:Check the microwave oven! by plover · · Score: 1

      Your microwave oven operates on the same frequency as Wifi, and 8:30-10:00pm seems like a likely time for it to be running.

      Holy crap, dude, what do you cook every night that you have to nuke it for 90 minutes??? Seriously, that's a hell of a long time to run a microwave oven, and really odd that someone would cook the same microwave meal night after night.

      If you're that desperate, you're likely cooking Hot Pockets or microwave burritos, and those take only a few minutes to turn from frozen and inedible to warm and inedible.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Check the microwave oven! by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      If you're that desperate, you're likely cooking Hot Pockets or microwave burritos, and those take only a few minutes to turn from frozen and inedible to warm and inedible.

      What do you mean warm? The center of a freshly microwaved hot pocket is a close approximation to the temperature of the surface of the sun. This is a well known fact.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    4. Re:Check the microwave oven! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, dude, what do you cook every night that you have to nuke it for 90 minutes??? Seriously, that's a hell of a long time to run a microwave oven

      Not if the oven is radiating microwaves out everywhere instead of into your food...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  40. 2.4GHz - 5GHz by Qrypto · · Score: 1

    I think one of your neighbors is talking to someone at the same time every night using his cordless phone. This could cause the type of interference if you are operating on the same channels and your antennas are positioned such that the RF waves are canceling each other. Try rotating your router 90. Seriously. Or if possible set your router to 5Ghz mode exclusively assuming your neighbor has a 2.4Ghz Phone.

  41. Ham radio by SpacePunk · · Score: 0, Troll

    I once had wireless internet from a local ISP. Between myself and the tower was a ham radio operator that evidently likes to walk all over the frequencies. I could never get the douche bag to quit fucking things up on a regular basis.

    1. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is he's part 91 can run 100W and you may not interfere with *him*.

    2. Re:Ham radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a big stink with the local government or (even better) HOA and they'll force him to rip out his antennas on his own dime. Works every time.
      If that fails, make a big stink with the local press, everyone will side with you and those antennas will be down in no time.
      If that fails, show up each night with a bolt cutters and chop the wire. Ham coax is expensive. After a couple times he'll have to give up.
      One of these days the FCC will wake the hell up and kick them all off the air. Until then we have to do it ourselves.

    3. Re:Ham radio by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      He's Part 97 and can run 1500W (and you may not interfere with *him*). So legally I could run a microwave oven with the door open as long as I followed all the other rules (exposure, mode, identification, etc).

      Most hams, myself included, are happy to help in cases of interference.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  42. What's your location again? by djupedal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check for any satellites that track overhead at that time.

    I remember when they used to open electric garage doors around the neighborhood....

    1. Re:What's your location again? by Taelron · · Score: 1

      That was control signals from a US Airforce base that was causing all the garage doors to go wonky iirc...

    2. Re:What's your location again? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Both happened, actually.

      One of the very early satellites - with a "hi, i made it" beacon - happened to match an early garage door opener receiver.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  43. RF shielding paint? by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tried http://www.safelivingtechnologies.ca/rf/Products_RF_Shielding_Paint_HSF54.htm RF Shielding paint? I always wondered if such paint would help. Of course it might kill your cell reception. If so, might be fun to paint your apartment in it before you move or maybe your bosses office when he is away.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:RF shielding paint? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      By itself, no the paint won't accomplish much. It needs to be grounded, and your doors and windows also need to be retrofitted to shield against RF. You also need to do something about any penetrations through the walls (wiring outlets and plumbing), not to mention that your cabling and plumbing systems (if the latter is metal) themselves have to be modified to prevent them from acting as antennas and piping the RF you're trying to block right into the shielded volume.
       
      It's not easy to block RF.

    2. Re:RF shielding paint? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      A Faraday cage does not need to be grounded in order to block out RF. The reason for grounding is entirely unrelated: it is a large conductor and it poses an electrocution hazard if a hot conductor should happen to short to it.

      Oh, and by the way... your plumbing system, if it is metal, is probably already grounded. However, attaching it to the pluming is not considered safe as a means of grounding something.

      You are correct about apertures in the surface but these would be fairly directional and relatively small. If a window does not shield against RF, your cell phone might work if you are standing right in front of the window, but the signal strength will probably be pretty negligible a few steps away.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:RF shielding paint? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      A Faraday cage does not need to be grounded in order to block out RF. The reason for grounding is entirely unrelated: it is a large conductor and it poses an electrocution hazard if a hot conductor should happen to short to it.

      Actually, it's for low frequencies, like with wavelengths large compared to the cage, when the cage isn't a total surround or has conductors penetrating it. The whole cage will swing in voltage with the incoming signal and you'll get a E-field inside the cage between the cage and the earth (or whatever) under the floor, whatever is outside any opening, or the "grounded" utilities inside the cage. Then you're not very well shielded. Grounding the cage (and/or tying it to the conductors that penetrate it) holds it at essentially the same voltage as its neighborhood and minimizes that stray E-field.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  44. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by dmneoblade · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nowadays it might be better and cheaper to go with 1.3 Ghz phones. Uses the TV bands that were freed up. I have one and have wonderfully interference-free calls.

    --
    Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
  45. Use a cheap (real) spectrum analyzer by tehaynes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using the 'Spectrum Analyzer' features built in to most APs and wireless clients will only show you other WiFi traffic not noise (almost always true). Also, they are not very portable. The earlier post about asking you local Ham Radio club is a good idea if there is anyone available and many Hams don't have equipment to listen to 2.4 or 5 GHz. You can search on google and other places for a 'usb wifi spectrum analyzer' for less than $50 that plugs in to your laptop. Be careful and read the specs though as some required that you use them in DOS mode. This will let you look at the actual received power level across the whole spectrum. You can walk around with a laptop until you find the noise source. It is still a steep price to pay for a one time fix. If you are the crafty type you can get a ez430-RF2500 target board for $22 from Texas Instruments. You will need to search for a software load that make it a SA but the are many instructions online. If you don't want to roll your own and get a prebuilt solution you can use the Ubiquiti AirView2 for ~$40. This is a very nice tool. You could even split the cost with your neighbors or pool money or request the person with the noisy device foot the bill for finding it.

    1. Re:Use a cheap (real) spectrum analyzer by bassman998 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been using the Wi-Spy from Metageek at work. I hadn't heard of the Ubiquity AirView. It looks like it's pretty competitive with the Wi-Spy -- apparently it uses the same chip, and the software has similar features. It'd be great if the AirView software had device signatures, but it appears that they're pretty receptive to feature requests through their forums. I'll definitely have to keep that product in mind as a recommendation to others. Thanks!

  46. Wi-Spy USB Spectrum Analyzer by bassman998 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Metageek has a few products in their Wi-Spy USB Spectrum Analyzer family. The cheapest one (the 2.4i) is $99, and the next model up (2.4x) is $199. It analyzes the entire 2.4GHz spectrum using your laptop and lets you see potential sources of interference. The 2.4x version allows you to use their more advanced software which also has device signatures -- you can overlay signal patterns of various types of devices (microwave, cordless phone, wireless baby monitors, etc.) on top of the signal density graph in order to identify what's causing the interference. I use the DBx version (2.4 + 5GHz) at work, and it's great for helping to find problems.

    1. Re:Wi-Spy USB Spectrum Analyzer by j741 · · Score: 1

      I agree with the choice of using the 'Wi-Spy' tool. It has been the most useful tool I have ever owned, for troubleshooting 2.4GHz interference problems. While it is not a high-quality directional spectrum analyzer, it is a cheap and useful visualization too. Want to make it directional? Just surround it with something that blocks or reduces RF signals (like a tin can).

      Laptop + Wi-Spy + short USB extension cable + tin can = a very useful tool for isolating sources of 2.4GHz RF interference.

      --
      - James
    2. Re:Wi-Spy USB Spectrum Analyzer by sven_eee · · Score: 1

      I use the old first version 1.0 of the hardware and it has done me well over the years and at $99 it has by far saved me enough time to pay for its self.

  47. Light Dimmer switch by lyallp · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem but it was affecting ADSL.
    It turned out to be a light dimmer switch.
    Try wandering around turning off lights...

    --
    ...Lyall
  48. InSSIDer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might do the trick to figure out where the interference is coming from, if it's another wireless network. I've had it work with a Broadcom card in Windows 7 that wouldn't work with Netstumbler. Might work with yours.

    Or you could get your hands on a WRT54G (borrow or cheap on eBay), install Tomato or something like it, and run the site survey tool. Figure out if there's some kind of channel overlap problem.

  49. Have you tried lining your apt in aluminum foil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It protects against more than just aliens you know. Here's an example: http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=201003245726.the_modern_paranoid_home

  50. Re:Try changing the channel in your wireless route by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    Try changing the channel in your wireless router. Most set to channel 6 by default.

    Remember, when choosing a channel, only 1, 6, and 11 are non-overlapping with each other - anything in between steps on the channel space of 1 and 6, or 6 and 11. Also, many (but not all) microwaves will impact the channel space between 6 and 11+, generally making 1 a better choice.

    Try doing a "survey" using your wireless driver's built-in tools (most Broadcom adapters have some sort of rudimentary tool - Intel should as well). Even just a list of nearest neighbors will help you identify what channels are nearby and at what strengths. Out of 1, 6, or 11, pick something that is within the least occupied space (least number of APs or weakest AP). If your nearest neighbors are using 1 and 6, and another particularly ignorant/rude neighbor is using 3, your only real choice is 11. Now if it's 1, 6, and 9, you're kinda hosed, and you'll have to hope the channel 1 AP is furthest away because the guy using 9 is impacting 1 and 6 (just as the guy using 3 is impacting 1 and 6).

    Google search turns up tons of results, but hopefully this paints a reasonable picture:

    http://bridgingthelayers.org/channel_overlap.html

    Unfortunately your NIC doesn't do 802.11a/n - otherwise I'd suggest looking into a dual-band 802.11n router. Tons of non-overlapping channels to pick from, but the range won't be quite as good (and you'll still have to steer clear of the 5.8ghz cordless phones).

    If it's really bad, have your neighbors help pitch in for a WiSpy 2.4x (~$200) which could be used to pin-point the culprit. When you're done, sell it on eBay to recoup most of the cost. Probably cheaper than having a wireless survey team coming "onsite" to validate w/ their pricey Cisco Spectrum Expert device. They'd be able to tell pretty quickly if you're dealing w/ someone who loves their microwave popcorn, a wireless video streaming device, some sort of Zigbee (though those are usually pretty low power compared to Wi-Fi and narrow-band in comparison), frequency hopping device (cordless phone, etc).

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  51. Back in the 80's by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid 80's I would have been the guy you where looking for. The guy with a 4 element beam antenna that was nearly the size of my house roof. Running a 4K watt bi-linear amplifier on a old but great tube driven DAK radio. I could speak to god on a clear night with that rig. My neighbors however where not that happy hearing my key pinger blare across their tv sets.

    --


    Got Code?
  52. WiSpy by pestilence669 · · Score: 1

    WiSpy + walking around = finding your noise

  53. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by PrecambrianRabbit · · Score: 1

    Neato, have you seen any range improvements/differences with 1.3 GHz? I'd heard a few complaints about range with the 5 GHz models. (Nothing from personal experience, I've been landline-less for years.)

  54. TOO EASY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a Wi-Spy for $99 from thinkgeek.com

    You'll find the problem in minutes.

  55. Other wireless devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could be anything. A couple years ago, we noticed at work that at odd times of the day the entire wireless network would die. It turned out that an engineer had bought himself a set of wireless speakers from Sharper Image and had them hooked up to his work computer. Whenever he fired up his music player, the damned setup blasted noise out across the entire 2.4G spectrum, at max power. It's possible that you are dealing with something similar here, a crappy audio or video device eating the entire spectrum, especially if the times given of 8:30pm to 10:00pm are variable.

    And oh yea, that engineer. He was in his own private cubicle and had his wireless speakers inches away from the transmitter. Needless to say, he was informed to remove the speakers and we established a policy that required all wireless devices be approved by IT.

  56. DD-WRT "Channel With" setting will kill WIFI star by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use DD-WRT which allows you to fine tune wi-fi router, and set "Wireless Network Mode" to N, and "Channel Width" from default 20 Mhz to 40 Mhz, then in Advanced Settings "TX Power" change from default 71 mW to max 251 mW, then you neighbour with pretty much standart WIFI router will have to start usin good ol RJ45. arnie said.

  57. expensive hardware by v1 · · Score: 1

    a tuned antenna, such as those 22'ish element beams for the band you're having problems with, attached to a spectrum analyzer or any number of other useful RF gear, and just wave it around and see where it's coming from. would take you all of about 20 minutes to nail down the house its coming from.

    The antenna's cheap. The analyzer, well, find a friendly ham radio operator in your area that's sympathetic to dealing with interference and borrow it or have them give you a hand.

    Or on the very cheap you could get one of those crummy little "Wifi hotspot detectors" that is only an RF meter. (does not for example, give ssids or allow you to select only open networks - you want one of the $15 ones with four lights on it for strength) and follow that around. They're directional and there are other tricks you can use to get a better bearing from them.

    I used to play cat n mouse / fox hunt a lot, and trust me, a directional antenna is definitely NOT required to track them down. Sure can make the job quicker tho.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  58. Re:Try it the low tech way... by javaguy · · Score: 1

    or make it look like a witch HUNT. Doh.

  59. USB Spectrum Analyzer by caljorden · · Score: 1

    What you need is a Wi-Spy, available from http://www.metageek.net/ These devices scan the RF for what is active. It helps detect 802.11 and other RF interference sources, and may help you find a better channel to use. Note, I am not affiliated with Metageek, other than being a happy customer. I support wireless networks as part of my job, and I can tell you that spectrum analysis is what you need.

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Microwave oven by yamum · · Score: 1

    My WIFI dies when the microwave is switched on.

    1. Re:Microwave oven by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Try changing the router to channel 1.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  62. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by shawb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    8:30 - 10:00 could also be a baby monitor.

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  63. Another vote for WiSpy by Robbat2 · · Score: 1

    I have the original WiSpy model, from when they first hit the market, and I still use it extensively.

    It's been insanely useful in tracing the problems, just put it on a laptop, with a long USB extension cable, and wander around. I will admit that I've only used it on Linux, as I don't have any Windows around, but it's been perfectly suited to my needs.

    A friend of mine was having a similar interference problem, during a subset of hours, and I traced it to one of the neighbours that would prepared dinner while using a set of wireless headphones.

    --
    ICQ# : 30269588
    "I used to be an idealist, but I got mugged by reality."
  64. sabotage by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You need to find out where it's coming from. If you can't get hold of a directional scanner or similar fancy gear, just sabotage the neighbors' electricity supplies one by one.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cemerlengo, is that you?

  65. Probably a baby monitor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're bad for WiFi and that's about the right time.

  66. You don't suppose.. by Jawcracker+Fuzz · · Score: 1
  67. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by dmneoblade · · Score: 1

    Havn't done much testing. Covers my apartment with no worries, but thats not saying too much.

    --
    Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
  68. Junk Band by Ozoner · · Score: 1

    2.4GHz is a "junk band" i.e your equipment is unlicensed. The disadvantage of being an unlicensed user is that you must accept any interference encountered.

    If you do find the source, what are you going to do about it?

    There are various LICENSED services in this band which are entitled to be there. Hams for instance are allowed 1500 Watt PEP on 2.4GHz.

    see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_multimedia_radio

  69. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by rekoil · · Score: 1

    I actually had the opposite problem - back in 2004 I bought a 5GHz phone system expressly to avoid interfering with my 802.11g wireless. When I went to 802.11n a few years later, I set the base station to 5GHz to avoid interference from all the other 2.5GHz wireless around...and saw the signal go to hell whenever the phone rang.

    Not long after that I ditched the landline for good.

  70. Xirrus by malbrech · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google xirrus wifi monitor. Is a free wifi signal monitor.

    1. Re:Xirrus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  71. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

    The DECT phones that finally made it to the US use 1.9 GHz, and they seem to be very common in stores now, and fairly cheap.

  72. Re:Only in Kenya! by shentino · · Score: 1

    The last line is "kenya believe it".

    If you're going to post a meme at least get it right, doofus.

  73. Mikrotik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a mikrotik router. I have a RB433UAH and a R52N card (I think), you can get views like this:
    http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Spectrum_analyzer

    It has various other tools to do AP scans etc and could perhaps to be used to triangulate the source with a directional antenna.

  74. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    I would assume it's lower.

    Less energy spent on the frequency means more spent on the range. Lower frequencies also tend to penetrate obstacles "better"

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  75. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by rapiddescent · · Score: 4, Informative

    +1 - we were given a baby monitor that transmits live video and source temperature. It destroys our WiFi capability - but only within 20 metres or so.

  76. Re:Try changing the channel in your wireless route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you're ignorant (though fortunately not rude), not necessarily the neighbor on 3.

    Depending on the network built up around him before he moved in, it's quite possible that channel 3 (ducking the 11 across the hall, and interfering with the 1 and 6 on either side of him, but at least down a few dB) is a better setup for all than stomping directly on top of any one of them.

    The best solution would be 1/6/11, but with the entire world reassigned for optimum spacing whenever a new AP comes up (Actually, pathological layouts probably exist to make a 1/4/7/11 plan better, but by far most layouts are adequately served with 1/6/11...), but this is infeasible. So sometimes, having control over only your own AP, channel 3/4 or 8/9 is really the best you can do.

    And BTW, WiSpy's too expensive. Get a Ubiquiti AirView -- same thing for ~$60 IIRC.

  77. Re:Try it the low tech way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make it a friendly note, with smiles, rainbows, and unicorns, so you don't offend anyone or make it look like a witch. As a bonus you get to know your neighbours.

    wow. you have not met my neighbors.

  78. Tv repeater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between 8.30 and 10 in the evening seems like somewhat who is watching TV with those TV repeater to get the cable signal in another room. Many of them use the unregulated spectrum. If that's the case the source must be fairly close.
    WiSpy (even just the "cheap" version 2.4i) may turn out useful especially if the issue is so repeatable (so that you don't have to leave the analyzer logging for days).
       

  79. Take a look at the central air system by UTF-8 · · Score: 1

    While router channel conflict is a common problem in denser areas, I found out that my variable speed central heater was causing power and radio interference with my internet connection when it turned on. The heater manufacturer had a kit to fix it though. I only noticed the interference source while using a portable AM radio and listening between the radio stations.

  80. Problem with that idea... by Demena · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fox and CNN supply different data. A Wi-Fi channel carries the same data. A difference that makes no difference.

  81. Amateur Radio Interference by TheEchelon · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's possible a ham radio op lives near you and he is most active at this time. If he is putting out enough power he could overload the "front end" of the radio receiver in your device or router/ap and thus attenuate quality signals. Depends greatly on frequency, power, modulation type and antenna design but maybe you are getting the perfect storm? Also- here is an awesome link on how to build a $10 Radio Direction Finder. http://theleggios.net/wb2hol/projects/rdf/tape_bm.htm

  82. I Hate You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either you or your neighbor are cooking popcorn / nachos / tv dinners in your microwave every night, or your other neighbor with the 2.4GHz tv repeater is watching scrubs. You should immediately break into your neighbors' houses and smash their appliances with a bat.

  83. Voodoo? by Demena · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not at all. Changing channels is a low work method to solve the problem which will take little time. Since it may very well fix it, it is an efficient first thing to do. Who needs to know about interference on an unused channel? Additionally they may provide information. For example, If all channels are blocked then it is not likely to be another Wi-FI issue unless something is majorly broken (to the point of not functioning). If the quick, cheap and easy fail then you assign resources to the problem.

    1. Re:Voodoo? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "If the quick, cheap and easy fail then you assign resources to the problem."

      You're hired.

  84. The usual suspects by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Here are the devices to look for:

    Microwave ovens
    Cordless phones (this happened at my home - moving cordless base away from router solved the problem)
    Surveillance cams (like baby watch monitors, etc.)
    Domestic TV repeaters
    Ham radio equipment (if the interference is on a 2.4 GHz WiFi device: part of the WiFI band is shared with them)

    As somebody has already suggested, changing the channel of your access point might help to solve the problem. Good luck...

  85. That remark suggests you are very young. by Demena · · Score: 1

    In my life I have gone from broke to wealthy and back several times. Living in a social democracy has allowed me to take many risks. Aside that, circumstances change. They always do.

    1. Re:That remark suggests you are very young. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      They do. Like I said. It means you are (still) doing something wrong if you can't find $5.

      Keep in mind said person has a wireless router, along with all the other things that are going to be going along with it. If they can't spend $5 on that card, then they should be getting internet access at the library, etc etc etc.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:That remark suggests you are very young. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      They do. Like I said. It means you are (still) doing something wrong if you can't find $5.

      Buddy can you spare $5 for a wireless dongle?

      Nah, he'll just spend it on drink.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  86. Not during a boss fight I hope. by Demena · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact not even with the trash. Soup and a tube work better and don't get players killed.

  87. No, no! by Demena · · Score: 1

    It routes MILFs to his bedroom so he can root them. ["root" pronounced the same a "route" is Aussie for fornication] On the other hand, since route and root are homonyms in English (not American) a "wife router" would be her husband...

  88. Wireless TV by GNious · · Score: 1

    Nicros, someone very close to where you live has a Wireless TV transmitter.

  89. It may be voltage in the AC electricity network by Max_W · · Score: 1

    Check the voltage in the AC electricity supply network with a digital voltmeter during these hours.

    If it drops down during these hours, then buy a stabilizer. Usually when people get how they switch on various electricity consuming devices. And if a transformer in your neighborhood has not enough capacity the voltage or frequency of AC may drop down.

    It may manifest itself especially when it is hoot or cold outside, because heating and air-conditioning takes a lot of power.

    1. Re:It may be voltage in the AC electricity network by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I know very little about power transmission but...but... if lots of people are using power off the transformer you're connected to, surely just the voltage will sag? The frequency will still be in step with the primary windings (which are driven by very large machines with huge amounts of inertia back in the power station). I know of no transformer that'll give you a different frequency on the secondary windings as to what arrives on the primary...

    2. Re:It may be voltage in the AC electricity network by Max_W · · Score: 1

      There is a good book on this topic: "Overload" by Arthur Hailey. It is a novel but Hailey's syle, with true technical details.

      There are three options for the power generating companies: reducing voltage, reducing frequency, or blackout of a city district. All three are bad.

      Unfortunately there is no easy way to reduce power needed to heat or air-condition a building, except of making it either smaller, or improving thermal isolation of walls, windows, doors, etc.

      My father in law had exactly the same problem with an CISCO ADSL modem. He had it for about 2 years. He called ISP, thought that neighbors switch on in the evening some heavy radio-electronic equipment, etc.

      I told him measure voltage in the morning when ADSL works and in the evening when it does not work sometimes. Finally he bought a voltmeter and measured. In the morning it was 220 V AC, as it should be, but in the evening - only 205 V AC.

      He bought a stabilizer for about USD 50.- and the problem was gone. For good, in the thin air. Never happened again. But he had to endure unstable Internet access for many months, spending his time and others'.

      ISP people were taking his modem to their office to check, gave him their own modem temporarily, which worked without problems, etc. There were a lot of problems, calls, but the actual problem was with the AC grid voltage, not with the Internet.

  90. Just seem this: by samjam · · Score: 1

    Saw this link: http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=adf37f5bc9893161b909b2f8ed3a15e7&t=2055944813
    on this story: http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/2/2010/06/28/ofcom_pln/

    Which seems relevant to you - maybe a neighbour turns on something noisy.

    Sam

  91. Visual wireless network scanner by Dokterdok · · Score: 1

    inSSIDer lets you visualize the strength of all the surrounding wifi networks, and if they overlap or not. It's free.

  92. microwave popcorn? try changing channels... by neurocutie · · Score: 1

    perhaps at 8:30 your neighbors are settling in to an evening movies with a big batch of microwave popcorn... or dinner of microwave casseroles... 2.4ghz cordless phones are nasty also... make sure you dont have any such cordless phones...

    if they are microwaving, prolly wont help to change channels, but otherwise it often helps to force your router and laptop to a wifi channel...

  93. More options.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just an idea...
    reflash your stuff to use euro/jspec frequencies.
    CH11-14 are pretty clear mostly.

  94. Call Capitan Ventosa by apetrelli · · Score: 1

    Capitan Ventosa (Captain Plunger) is an Italian hero with a plunger on his head.
    With his "Ventosa Radio Team" discovers radio interferences with an antenna attached to a spectrum analyzer.

  95. Android + WiFi Analyzer by Dynamoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have an Android phone, you can download a free application called WiFi Analyzer by Kevin Yuan which scans signal strength and can identify possibly interfering networks, pretty much like NetStumbler but in a more convenient package. If you are patient enough then you can map out signal strengths in various locations when you have GOOD reception, and then compare them to what happens when you have BAD reception and see where the interference is worse.. if it's a rival WiFi network then it should be even easier! But as others say.. the source of interference could be one of so many things in the 2.4 GHz band including DECT phones, baby monitors, microwaves or even just plain old fault equipment

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Android + WiFi Analyzer by Simozene · · Score: 1

      Great suggestion! Recently my wifi at home kept dropping so I changed the channel and all the problems went away. I will use this to find the optimal channel to use in my condo. Thanks!

    2. Re:Android + WiFi Analyzer by johnshirley · · Score: 1

      We have a guy in the office with an Android phone... on which he had installed an app that he mistakenly configured in such a way that it killed all wireless connections within 50 yards. Apparently, it had a feature to create an ad-hoc network, which he gave the same name as our corporate wireless network. Joe Employee tried to connect to the corporate wireless network with a particular name, it spotted the ad hoc network and refused to connect. We had all kinds of complaints.

  96. Near any electronics testing? by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    Boeing and Mitre have both trashed my wireless signals to Part 15 devices. And they are primary or secondary on the bands in use. WiFi is an unlicensed interloper of limited power. Confronted by even the sidebands of some transmitters operating in a licensed and legal mode there is no hope. Except. Faraday shields keep all the signal goodness inside in as well as keep the bad juju out. The moral of this story is when you walk through a metal door with metallic gaskets ask your friendly native guide what you're walking through... And I swear some joker at Boeing scans through the 305MHz car alarm unlock sequences when his equipment is otherwise idle. My car unlocks itself about once a month. I'm not the only one in the area hat it happens too either. And remember that like most Part 15 devices the receiver is deaf. A good quality 2.4 or 5GHz receiver will see a pretty solid noise floor from all the WiFi for 1000's of yards or more in urban settings.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  97. Android phone + free app by Leperous · · Score: 1

    For basic, "free" analysis you could try the Wifi Analyzer app on the Android market (perhaps one of your friends has an Android phone if you don't?) http://www.androidzoom.com/android_applications/tools/wifi-analyzer_bgn.html

  98. Metageek has the answer by bjoeg · · Score: 1

    Try inSSIDer which also can show you some of the non-broadcasting networks.

    But nevertheless the true tool would be a spectrum analyzer, Metageek sells some cheap ones.

    And think about moving to 5Ghz.
    Wireless intereference is not something new, and 2.4Ghz aint just big enough, especially not in apartments complexes, and equipment broadcasting at full power.

  99. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which doesn't transmit unless there's sound detected, eg. crying.

  100. OK, FCC for US, who to call for UK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm well aware of useful tools like kismet, Inssider and Wi-Spy, but what if the former can't help, and the latter seems too expensive? surely there is a team like the FCC you can call in the UK if a streets wifi is all interrupted at the same time for no clear reason.

    1. Re:OK, FCC for US, who to call for UK? by Arimus · · Score: 1

      OFCOMM and the DTI are responsible for spectrum...

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  101. Change the channel on your wifi router. by propylene22 · · Score: 1

    If you and your neighbors all have routers on the same channel then you could be interfering with each others signals all the time and it is just made worse during high use times. I think the default for most routers is channel 9 or 11. Try using vista stumbler it works with win vista and 7. Look at all the network that are available and see what channels they are on. You want to pick a channel that is not occupied or if the are all occupied the ones with the weakest signal.

  102. Re:Only in Kenya! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    He screwed up more than just the last line.

  103. Software Wifi Monitoring by LRayZor · · Score: 1

    I had this problem at one time. Used the free version of NetSurveyor. Found out which channels were being used and manually set the router to a different one.

    http://www.nutsaboutnets.com/performance-wifi/products/netsurveyor-network-discovery.htm

  104. Treadmill by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

    Just a suggestion: It might be a treadmill exercise machine. I have one which completely knocked out wifi and ADSL until I isolated it with a expensive choke on the mains lead. Ask your neighbours if they use one between the hours you gave.

  105. Look for antenna's by Taelron · · Score: 3, Informative

    Growing up a friend of mine had a CB base station and a Ham radio, not satisfied with the range on his CB Base station he added boosters to his system. Any time he fired up his Base station to full power, TV's for a block or so went out everytime he key his mic. Look around and see if you see any radio antenna's around the neighborhood. Could be an overpowered CB or Ham Radio operator that gets on at that time every night.

    1. Re:Look for antenna's by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      It's VERY unlikely that a ham or cb operator is interferring with wifi as the frequency involved is several orders or magnitude removed. Some hams do operate on vhf and uhf frequencies, but even here the highest frequency used is in the 470 MHZ region about 5 times removed from the 2400mhz wifi 'band'. Also ham equipment is usually very well filtered so they don't have much spurious junk out of band.

    2. Re:Look for antenna's by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      In the US, part of the 2.4GHz band is actually a ham band, so if this guy is unlucky enough to have a neighbor who messes around with some of the higher frequencies he's SOL.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    3. Re:Look for antenna's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CB is soooo far away from 802.11 on the spectrum I doubt this is the case. It *could* be an amateur radio operator in the 2.4ghz band, but most the time those are low power and directional antennas going to repeater sites. Also 2.4ghz antennas aren't the huge whips that CB uses (again, because the frequency is so far away). There is not much activity in the 2.4ghz for hams (yes I am licensed, not just winging it here). Also, unless the operator just dead-keys for hours on end, the signal would come and go as they keyed up to talk, then released to listen. I would guess someone has a wireless speaker system and they watch TV from those hours. That would create a constant signal that would step on anything else, and also wouldn't show up as an active AP in any netstumbler list.

  106. TV extender by RenHoek · · Score: 1

    There's these cheap TV signal extenders you can get that work in the unregulated 2.4Ghz range. I'm betting it's something like that.

  107. Its TV by thogard · · Score: 1

    Someone is using a 2.4 ghz video sender. It wipes out all the the 2.4 Ghz band. Get your own sender system and figure out what they like to watch. You may consider sending your own content as well.

  108. Re:Try it the low tech way... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    As a bonus you get to know your neighbours

    You do realise you're posting on slashdot?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  109. Hold laptop and rotate till signal drops by mrcaseyj · · Score: 1

    Use your body to block the source of either the signal or the noise. Hold your WiFi radio (either your laptop or your access point) in front of you and slowly rotate while you watch the signal or noise level. When it drops, the source is probably behind you. Walk down the street if necessary and do it again to triangulate the signal.

  110. Ir could be many things, I have some suggestions by naplam33 · · Score: 0

    Even a microwave oven, but it's weird it's lasting exactly 2 hours. Maybe some of your neighbours has some household "experiment" running (fusion reactor anyone?) Arrange this with your neighbours: each one of you tries channel 1, 6 and 12, just to check that it affects all frequencies or just one. Another thing you could try: get a directional antenna to try to find the source of the interference (if you point it towards the interference source you should get few or none aps when passively scanning -with kismet for example). Taking into account you have like 2 hours, you can triangulate an approximate location.

  111. Sometimes I can't afford that $5 by Demena · · Score: 1

    But I have ~30k of computer gear in use in this house. Bought when I could afford it. That was before a separation. So, you telling me I should sell my gear and use the library? That is a bit offensive. Particularly as due to ill health I can't climb the hill to it anymore. "You are old, father William the young man said...."

    1. Re:Sometimes I can't afford that $5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I have ~30k of computer gear in use in this house. Bought when I could afford it. That was before a separation. So, you telling me I should sell my gear and use the library?

      No, I think he's saying that maybe you could have set $5 aside while you were busy dropping $30K on gear.

    2. Re:Sometimes I can't afford that $5 by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That's in-line with what I mean.

      My real point is that $5 is hardly a large sum of money.

      Buy a cheaper bag of rice here, abstain from Starbucks there (or just get a smaller size (if possible)) and you will find you have $5.

      If it's really that big of a deal, you can find $5. Hell, go spend an hour or two busking.

      -- in your situation, yes I -would- sell. Some of it at least. You realize you spent more than a year of my salary on that gear, and -I'm- the one telling you $5 is no big thing? If this thing is really so critical to cause you such angst, go sell a few cables or something. Really.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  112. Hired? by Demena · · Score: 1

    I'd like to be. Bt I was in IT and the young never believe the old can be wise about anything. Yeah, I would love a job again.

  113. cut all power cables... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Get wifi-detector gadget with signal strength indicator.
    2. Ask all neighbours to turn off all their wifi, microwaves, remote controlled cars etc.
    3. Place said gadget at bottom of pringles can.
    4. Stand on roof and do 360 degree sweep. Note signal strengths.
    5. Walk to end of block, repeat sweep, noting signal strengths.
    6. Triangulate.
    7. Use diplomacy, US style. send the marines as first resort.

  114. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    and source temperature

    I know this is probably for detecting a fever. But I just wanted to point out that it's also good for detecting dead babies.

  115. I've hated WiFi since I wasted a day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    figuring out that every time someone ran the microwave in the kitchen the WiFi video camera stopped sending and didn't recover.

  116. InSSIDer by maxume · · Score: 1

    If you is on a modern Windows, InSSIDer should at least allow you to poke around your wifi neighborhood:

    http://www.metageek.net/products/inssider

    (Sorry if someone already posted this, I didn't read the whole thread, and yes, that 'is' up there are on purpose)

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  117. I had the same (or darn near similar) issue by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    What I had to do... "sudo iwlist eth1 scan" from the terminal. After you provide password, you get a listing of all the available wifi routers in range. One will be yours, check the channel it is on; compare it to all the other routers that show up in the list. Make sure that you are not sharing a channel with any of them. (I.E.: change the channel your router is on.) This is what solved my issue.

    1. Re:I had the same (or darn near similar) issue by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      That assumes the problem is a router. If the source of the interference is some other device operating in the 2.4GHz band then this will not help.

      Judging solely from the consistent timing of the event, I would guess that it is some sort of audio/video repeater/transmitter. I know that Radioshack sells them and they operate in the right spectrum.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  118. Re:Try changing the channel in your wireless route by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    With my issue, both my neighbor and I were on channel 6, and I was still being interfered with. Once I went to 7 it was fine.

  119. Have you tried .. by gil.i.hauer · · Score: 1

    ... not holding the NIC in your left hand?

  120. Arrgh! by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    1 - we were given a baby monitor that transmits live video and source temperature. It destroys our WiFi capability - but only within 20 metres or so.

    WHY does the FCC allow these things!
    .
    .
    .
    I mean, what are babies good for anyway?

    1. Re:Arrgh! by sh00z · · Score: 1

      I mean, what are babies good for anyway?

      You're kidding, right? As early as the 18th century, many practical uses had been identified.

  121. That Darn XBOX by jagb · · Score: 1

    Not sure where you are experiencing your problem: at work or at home?In my case, my son's XBOX USB WiFI dongle was periodically trashing my home WiFi. Finally gave up, ran a wire and poof WiFi problem is now gone. Any consoles on your Wifi network active between 8and 10?

  122. smallnetbuilder.com article on resolving WiFi prob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an excellent article about resolving WiFi problems like this at http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-howto/31190-when-wireless-lans-collide-how-to-beat-the-wireless-crowd

  123. I had that problem too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It turned out it was my alien neighbors communicating with their mother ship circling Uranus.

  124. In my case: cordless surround sound speakers by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    I bought a new amp that supported wireless surround sound speakers and after a while figured out that they were killing my WiFi. The manufactures documentation didn't specify the band (maybe in the fine print) and the vendor was hard put to come up with what WiFi channel to use. After two years the vendor still has nothing about this on the web site and I have to turn the amp off to use WiFi.

    --
    Nate
    1. Re:In my case: cordless surround sound speakers by Simozene · · Score: 1

      I have the same situation with my own surround sound system. It is highly plausible that the posters neighbor comes home and watches TV at night and unknowingly causes all his neighbors WIFI networks to come down. I live in a condo and only use my surround sound system to watch movies now because of this bug.

  125. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

    but how can 1.3ghz be better than 5ghz? surely more ghz is better? like a six year old pentium 4 @3.8 ghz is much better than a new core i5 @ 2.2ghz. its a shame you can't buy them anymore.

    --
    Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  126. garage door too by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    I don't know about wifi, but I'm having problems with my garage door opener. Most of the time I can open the door from my car from the street at the end of a long driveway, but sometimes I can't even get it to work with the car right in front of the frag'n door! I have no idea what frequency Sears uses for their remote controls but it's probably in the 900mhz or 2400mhz bands.

  127. Crappy Soundsystem by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I purchased a simple sound system, (actually I believe I got it for free when I purchased something else like a TV), and it was a Panasonic. It didn't come with rear speakers, but they had these wireless rear speakers, so I bought them a few months afterward. These were 2.4 ghz as well, but they interfered with the wireless upstairs something horrible. We would sit down to watch TV (you know, like prime time, 8pm-10pm) and turn on the sound system, and it would kill our wifi access instantly. The worse part about the system is that it scanned channels automatically and picked one which wasn't being used. I live in a suburban area, and you can see 10-20 SSIDs from my house. Needless to say there are not many channel "holes". Perhaps one of your neighbors has a similar setup? I've since bought a new sound system complete with wired rear speakers.

    --
    FLR
  128. 802.11g and 2.4GHz phones by psychosystem · · Score: 1

    I had a similar issue at an old apartment. I tracked it down to my 2.4GHz phone - whenever it would ring or we would talk on it, it would knock our 802.11abg router signal out. They both operate at 2.4GHz, causing the interference. I replaced my phone with a 5.8GHz phone, and that took some of it away. Our neighbors also had a 2.4GHz phone, and whenever they would get on the same thing would happen. My final solution was to move :) I've had few issues since I moved to a 5.8GHz phone and 802.11n router.

    --
    This is my Sig.
  129. re: Tracking Down Wi-Fi Interference by nik_qc · · Score: 1

    Could be a cordless phone....May be even FCC certified ;) I have a phone at home (Panasonic, 2.4GHz) that blocks _completely_ my WiFi access point. Tried with two different routers, Linksys WRT54G and Apple Time Capsule. Initiate a call and voila - no WiFi access. Got rid of it and switched to Time Capsule with 2 frequency ranges, this helps a lot (especially if you have more than a dozen of other 802.11g APs around :) ). Chances to find the source of interference are quite low and, possibly, getting a 5GHz router is easy, they are not that expensive. One thing you can do, if you are sure about 8:30-10 is to use any software that scans WiFi networks around (Kismet?) to find the new network that appears around 8:30. If you can identify the network, you can try to track down the source - walk around with the laptop, measure signal strength, try to guess the direction. Depending on how good you are with your neighbors, you can also try to drop them a polite note asking to help to identify the wireless device causing troubles for others. Offering free help to reconfigure it :) Assuming the owner does not use this device on purpose :)

  130. inSSIDer is what your looking for by axor1337 · · Score: 0

    inSSIDer will scan the freq's just like netstumbler but works with your existing wifi driver and stack. it will work with and card on XP, VIsta, or 7. as for netstumbler you don't mention your OS it only works on XP. Second, the FCC will investigate if you phrase your complaint properly. use the terms Pirate Broadcast, and or terrorist transmission. don't expect them to solve it overnight it may take a few days or weeks for them to even show up. Third, consider switching to 802.11n 5Ghz if the issue is specific to the 2.4Ghz range then using 5Ghz will evade the problem.

    --
    there are 10 types of people in this world, those who read binary and those who don't. which are you!
  131. Reminds me of a cell phone issue by beerdini · · Score: 1

    A coworker of mine has a similar issue with her cell phone at her house. When she gets within 2 blocks of her home her phone loses its signal, and she has confirmed with her neighbors that also have the same carrier that they have the same problem. She recently got a new phone thinking that it was a problem with the phone, but the problem continues. Other people with the same carrier can come over and their phones on the same network work with a full signal, but everyone that lives there continues to have trouble. She and her neighbors have called the carrier, done the tower update codes and everything else that they make you do and the carrier continues to claim that there is no problem and they have to live with it.

  132. Marine Band Radar, in my case by LawPrime · · Score: 1

    We live on the Ohio River and our 2.4GHz WiFi (all bands) was wiped out periodically just about every day for 10-15 minutes at a time. Neighbors all reported this, as well. I bought a WiSpy and patiently waited for a blackout to occur, then correlated them all to barge traffic on the river. Only then did I notice the big rotating antennae on the tugs. It is only a small leap of faith to determine that our problem is bleed-over from similar-spectrum Marine-band radar into the unlicensed 2.4GHz spectrum. Could have changed to 5GHz (where my phones operate unhindered) or coax-based MoCA, but I decided to try HomePlug-spec'd devices, which use AC house wiring to get encrypted 100Mbps throughput. My Linksys Powerline boxes can be plugged in wherever they are needed, have worked flawlessly, and I have a spare for when people come over to work with me. Still use WiFi around the place for maximum portability, but not for production-mode stuff.

    1. Re:Marine Band Radar, in my case by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...I decided to try HomePlug-spec'd devices...

      Thereby wiping out shortwave reception for miles around.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Marine Band Radar, in my case by LawPrime · · Score: 1

      > ...I decided to try HomePlug-spec'd devices...

      Thereby wiping out shortwave reception for miles around.

      I was not aware before your post that HomePlug interfered in HF shortwave. Sorry about that. But from what I can read, "...miles around..." is a bit of hyperbole for my little condo all by itself. The issue seems to become important in places where there is a high degree of adoption or else when used in ACCESS mode -- that is, to deliver broadband over the main lines.

      If I ever get the chance, I will of course look into the actual interference to HF in my neighborhood. But until then, if you notice me interfering with your HF CQ, I will be glad to switch to MoCA. But I doubt my neighbors will do the same, so the shortwave community is going to need a regulatory approach to solve this problem.

  133. Do you have an Android phone? by Benfea · · Score: 1

    If you suspect the problem is coming from another Wi-Fi signal, you can download and install the app "WiFi Analyzer" to turn your phone into a handy little tool for seeing just how many networks are in range and the relative signal strength of each one. You can even use it to pick the best channel for avoiding interference, and the app is free.

  134. So do the obvious... by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

    So do the obvious and shoot at it already. Instant results guaranteed.

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  135. why do I need another subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have heard a similar anecdote onetime and it was some people starting up some heavy duty machinery and/or doing arc welding or metal grinding or something like that. i vaguely remember it had something possibly to do with 3-phase power, and it was due to some lazy fucks being fucking lazy. starting some generator or something to do the above work and it was causing the interference or something.

    fucking slashdot requires i must wait more than 8 minutes before posts?
    get fucked.
    lashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 8 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.

    and that was on a completely fucking different thread too, for fucks sake.

    fucking retarded system for retards.
    It's been 9 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    It's been 10 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

  136. $40 2.4 GHZ Spectrum Analyser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a $40 2.4 GHZ Spectrum Analyser from here: http://www.microcom.us/airview2.html
    There are also others with external antennas: http://www.microcom.us/browse-by-brand--ubiquiti-networks.html

  137. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by irving47 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget those newer DECT 6.0 phones. They're cheap and they operate on the 1.9Ghz band. IIRC, that spectrum space was set aside for phones only because of this exact problem.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  138. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the 6.0 is misleading, it was called DECT 6.0 in the US for marketing reasons. The 6.0 means nothing other than being a higher number than 5.8.

    Even though 1.9 is far better than 2.4 and 5.8 (2.4 is a noisy band, higher frequencies don't penetrate obstacles as well.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  139. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Odd, there are actually two subbands within the 5 GHz band, and phones are in a different one than wifi.

    Phones are usually around 5.8 GHz, wifi is usually a bit lower IIRC.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  140. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Evildonald · · Score: 1

    Exactly what I was thinking!

  141. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or an 800 MHz phone. All my wireless phones a re 800MHz to avoid WiFi interference, and they work as well as any other wireless phone.

  142. This ain't bad by jcluthe · · Score: 1

    http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-howto/31190-when-wireless-lans-collide-how-to-beat-the-wireless-crowd - The guy is no slouch. maybe not the most technical article I ever read, but it should help you.

  143. Baby monitors killing urban Wi-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a Slash-Dot article from last year about
    unlicensed 2.4GHz baby-monitors in urban areas and
    interference with Wi-Fi devices.
    "Our research suggests that ... the affected parties are almost certainly seeing interference from non-Wi-Fi devices such as microwave ovens, Audio Video senders, security cameras or baby monitors."

    The Slash-Dot link is here:
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/11/1335208

  144. KisMAC by jonmann3000 · · Score: 1

    Find a friend who uses a mac laptop to come over and download a program called KisMAC, its a program that uses your wifi card in passive mode and collects packets to analyze for retrieving router keys. You might also be able to find a similarly functional computer for PCs with specific network cards, it seems like you already tried that and had difficulty so thats why i suggest kismac. Start it up at 5 or 6 while your internet is still up and running. Periodically look at it and see what routers seem to be getting traffic, you'll be able to tell by how quickly the number of packets collected goes up. then, if on this particular day your wifi network goes down, pay close attention to any network transferring lots of packets especially if it hadn't been very active before. If its not on the list or it doesn't work well its most likely not interference caused by another router and you'll probably need some more sophisticated equipment to track it down.

  145. Re:Try it the low tech way... by jc79 · · Score: 1

    I find smiles, rainbows and unicorns incredibly offensive, you insensitive clod.

    At least you didn't recommend comic sans.

  146. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by SQLGuru · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be better for detecting living babies? The dead ones would approach room temp and become "invisible" in the IR spectrum. The live ones should stand out like a sore thumb.

  147. Brick neighbor's routers? Ouch! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    That's a bit much. Why not just change the channel/set it to Auto, and maybe set a password? They'll never look back at it anyways.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  148. Why don't you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get Google to look into your wifi for you? I'm sure they'd be happy to.

  149. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BWAHAHA

  150. Re:Try it the low tech way... by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a bonus you get to know your neighbours

    You do realise you're posting on slashdot?

    Not everyone knows their mom as well as they should.

  151. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We run our baby monitor all the time (and I was sure to get a 900MHz one for distance, which it turns out isn't all that great, maybe 50 feet). But there are a lot of them at 2.4GHz.

  152. It's the microwave ovens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its cause everyone is using their microwave ovens in the morning to nuke their breakfast. those tend to wipe out wifi as the microwave is about 10,000x stronger, and even with the shielding enough leaks out to drown out wifi....

  153. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by molo · · Score: 3, Informative

    That is not correct for North America. The 700MHz band is what was freed up, UHF channels 52-69. Channel 69 was at 800 MHz. The highest channel ever allocated was 83, at 885MHz (rescinded sometime in the 80s). There was no 1.3 GHz broadcast TV channel in the US.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  154. I said thing change... by Demena · · Score: 1

    I didn't set aside $5. I set aside $330,000. But settlements can do horrible things. I kept my business but no operating capital. It will me take some years to recover. Since I do not use credit things are sometimes tight. What he is saying does not account for the vagaries of fortune which he will doubtless realise when he is older.

    1. Re:I said thing change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an older friend used to say 'marry to someone richer than you, kid'.

    2. Re:I said thing change... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Just drawing your attention to my reply to the AC here since you wouldn't get a notification about it, and it's nice to have discussions longer than a single back-n-forth on Slashdot once in a while :)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  155. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

    No, I think they're marketed for SIDS prevention, so your dead babies is right on.

    Fever would be pretty hard to detect without being invasive if you think about it. If a room was cold a feverish baby could have skin that was more or less cool to the touch.

  156. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "ONLY" 20 metres. Nice mansion you must be living in.

  157. Don't blame age of microwave by managerialslime · · Score: 1

    If your microwave is wrecking your Wi-Fi connection, don't grumble about it. Get a newer microwave oven.

    This problem is not limited to "old" equipment.

    My less-than-two-years-old top-of-the-line Panasonic microwave stops all wireless communications in the house when operating.

    --
    Live Long and Prosper - Thanks Leonard. You are missed.
  158. thinkgeek has a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/c240/

    You know, it's getting really crowded out there. And we're not just talking about that ever-increasing ring of space debris that is orbiting the earth. All those defunct satellites, explosion fragments and paint flakes are really junking up the place. No, our immediate concern is the ever-increasing use of the 2.4 GHz "junk band" and how it can cause interference problems with your equipment. So, if you want to analyze the 2.4 GHz band to see all that junk, we have the perfect device.
    Insert alternative description here

    The new Wi-Spy 2.4i packs a lot of value into a compact package with extra-fine resolution and a super-low noise floor, not seen on other entry-level tools. Plus, Chanalyzer Lite, Wi-Spy 2.4i’s software, offers a great assortment of features that help you get to the bottom of interference issues quickly and easily. And to top it off, it now has a 3-D view and Mac support.
    What does Wi-Spy 2.4i do?

            * Tracks all radio activity from Wi-Fi, Cordless Phones, Microwave ovens, Zigbee, Bluetooth, or any other 2.4 GHz device.
            * Graphically shows which channels to use and which ones to avoid.

    What's unique about Wi-Spy 2.4i?

            * Best resolution in the sub-$100 price range.
            * Bundled with the latest software, Chanalyzer Lite, the definitive answer to spectrum analysis on a budget.
            * Compatible with both PC and Mac!

    How can the Wi-Spy 2.4i help me?

            * Resolve wireless issues quickly and easily.
            * Know the best channel for your WLAN.
            * Track access points and their channel usage with real-time radio data.
            * Keep on top of intermittent interference issues.

    System Requirements:

            * Windows XP or newer with .Net 2.0 or Mac OSX 10.5
            * USB 1.1 or 2.0

  159. Re:Wi-Spy only windows/mac by OFnow · · Score: 1

    Wi-Spy only works for Windows/Mac. Not Linux. Sigh.

  160. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by zill · · Score: 3, Informative

    Decomposition generates a lot of heat...

  161. Re:Try it the low tech way... by zill · · Score: 1

    Maybe be peaceful solution is better after all.

    Now I regret yelling "get off my lawn" at them all these years.

  162. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fair enough. But if a parent hasn't checked on their kid in enough time for decomp to generate enough heat to notice, I'd contend that the parent has other issues.

  163. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My old 900mhz phone works great. I never get interference from house wiring, or wifi and it has great penetration through walls. Works anywhere on my property. Do they still even make 900mhz phones anymore?

  164. plane radar by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Ship radar is one possibility. So is airplane radar. At certain points during ascent or descent, planes can point right at housing areas with their radar. That is especially true when they are not allowed to circle. I lived right in line with a major airport for a while and when the prevailing winds were blowing, ascents would aim right at my place for a few minutes. During that time, the plane's forward lights would shine (weakly at that distance) into the window and the radar would really disturb FM signals on the radio. Then the plane would veer off and the radio would go back to normal until the wake cleared and the next plane could take off. However, all that is too short to match the problem described in the original post where wi-fi is out for hours.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  165. Get an android phone, seriously. by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    Previously at work i used pretty expensive equipment to analyze the wifi spectrum. Nowadays the only thing i need is my Nexus One and the Wifi Analyzer application. While its very simple and not at all very fancy i have no problem isolating and identifying sources of interference.

    Have you tried a couple of other channels? If that dont help its probably not another wifi thats the source of interference. A simple triangulation with Wifi Analyzer and the channel rating stuff should make it easy to spot exactly where the interference originate. Unless its really strong, then you have to extend your triangulation area a bit.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  166. Wireless 802.11a/n 5GHz by wellard1981 · · Score: 1

    OK, it's a little more expensive and doesn't have great range through walls plus most Wireless N equipment can utilize the 5GHz band. I can usually discover 20+ access points from inside my apartment all running on various channels in the 2.4GHz band, my wireless network is the only one running at 5GHz, and I've never had a dropout while using it. I no longer get interference from cordless phones, microwaves, etc.

  167. bofh excuse by samsonov · · Score: 1

    That would be solar flares, son.

    --
    "You killed my yogurt!" --Fred Fredburger
  168. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by religious+freak · · Score: 1

    lol - I love /. The only place where a dead babies joke can be regarded as funny! Awesome

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  169. Free, simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab a copy of Backtrack-4, and a netbook/laptop, fire up airmon, set it to radio monitoring mode, wander around and see what it coughs up.
    http://www.aircrack-ng.org/doku.php?id=airmon-ng
    and
    http://www.backtrack-linux.org/
    You get a pretty graph and everything.

  170. Police radar gun? by Slicebo · · Score: 1

    Some night, drive around your neighborhood at 9:00 to see if there's any kind of law enforcement speed trap in the area. The radar gun could play havoc with nearby wireless.

    Just don't drive around too fast!

  171. I have the same issue, but no neighbors. by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    Well, I *do* have neighbors, but they're over 300 yards away.

    Every night at 10:15-10:45, my wifi craps out and needs to be restarted. It's gotten to the point that I've got it on an x10 controller that I can use with a remote.

    It's the *only* thing in the house using x10. We don't have a microwave. Noone is on the phone. The TV has been on for hours at that point.

    I'm going to try changing channels, but still, it's quite weird. Restarting the wifi takes care of it, I don't have to restart the cable modem. It's a horrible d-link device (dir-628) that I would never buy again.

  172. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to throw out something that works just fine (if for someone else). Let's burn through all of the resources on this planet as quickly and as wastefully as possible! (And, no, "recycling" is significantly wasteful too.)

  173. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    But it takes a while for the body temp to jump up for decomposition after the initial temp dip back to room temperature. Probably days.

  174. Power company transmitting daily logs/reports by apachesurfer · · Score: 1

    Sounds ridiculous I am sure, but there was a fairly elaborate wireless network setup in a little town in the middle of nowhere. Everything worked fine with normal problems here and there for 2 1/2 years. Until one day, all wireless signal went down from 3-5 p.m. Since the day it started, it has happened everyday since. I was never able to fully understand the problem, but several technicians from the Utility Commission whom I believe, said they finally found out that a power company was transmitting data through a point to point wireless connection to another facility a couple of miles a way. They said that they were sure this was the problem. Just sounds familiar to me.

  175. Reminds me of one I heard a while ago. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Caveat: IBM customer engineer involved -> my tech-ish brother -> me. Take with requisite amount of salt.

    Was shortly after the "foreign attachments" decision in an IBM antitrust case, which required IBM to post specs and allow other companies to build and plug in peripherals. During that period a bunch of multivendor projects got started - and many were the rounds of finger-pointing when it came time to integrate the products of a half-dozen or so vendors into a delivered system. This was one of 'em.

    The system was being integrated at the install site - a building at an airport. Every piece had worked just fine in the vendors' labs. Nothing played well at all on the final site. Was a madhouse of vendor engineers trying to get things to play together.

    At one point one of the engineers got sufficiently bugged by a flickering fluorescent light that he decided to do something about it. He got a ladder and turned off the lights preparatory to doing the fix - but the tube kept flickering. "Hey, guys. Look at this!"

    Turned out the airport's search radar was right next door to this wooden building. Anyone familiar with transistor circuits and the number of volts-per-inch of signal strength needed to light an unpowered fluorescent lamp knows what that means.

    They paneled the wall with aluminum. Everything started working. All shook hands and went home.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  176. It's that old big ass microphone Larry King uses. by leftie · · Score: 1

    You know that big old ass microphone Larry King uses at CNN? That's it.

    Nikola Tesla designed it for Larry King personally.

  177. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by lazyforker · · Score: 1

    And complaints from the neighbours.

  178. Re:Try changing the channel in your wireless route by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    (Actually, pathological layouts probably exist to make a 1/4/7/11 plan better, but by far most layouts are adequately served with 1/6/11...), but this is infeasible. So sometimes, having control over only your own AP, channel 3/4 or 8/9 is really the best you can do.

    1/4/7/11 still have some fringe overlap for edge sub-channels (especially between 1 and 4), don't expect full speed w/ lots of neighbors.

    Using 3/4 or 8/9 may help your problem (or at least afford you some lower data rates), but in an apartment complex or other high-density independent deployment, it only contributes to the overall problem, making channel dodging that much more difficult.

    This argument is akin to an approx 71.5 foot (mhz) wide freeway with with 3 twenty-five foot wide lanes (1/6/11@22mhz wide + 2.75mhz spacing between 1/6 and 6/11). By design, you're driving your hypothetically 22 ft wide car down the center of the lane. There's up to 1.4 ft on each side in the center lane between you and the lane edge.

    You can try to drive between lanes, but you're still going to "interfere" with traffic nearby. Condensing the lanes into four now creates significant overlap between traffic (approx 10-25%).

    Now in reality, an OFDM (802.11a/g) wireless signal is made up of 48 sub-channels equally spaced across its 22mhz "channel". Instead of completely wiping out your signal, some of your sub-channels would be interference-prone, effectively reducing your data-rate. So, you can choose channels besides 1/6/11 (or 1,5,9,13 in the EU), but you must understand the consequences to yourself and your neighbors.

    Or just go 802.11a/n on 5ghz and call it a day. 2.4gz is becoming far too crowded in highly dense deployments anyway.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  179. Re:Try changing the channel in your wireless route by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    Try 1 or 11 instead. 7 is only 5mhz offset from 6. You're still sharing 77% of the spectrum with your neighbor and killing about 10% of anyone nearby who may be trying to use channel 11.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  180. Re:Wi-Spy only windows/mac by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    Wi-Spy's included software only works in Windows/Mac, but there are 3rd party open source tools like Spectool-GTK that do work in Linux.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  181. Re:Go 802.11 by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

    If I read the original story correctly, this would be a complaint involving multiple users over a definite geographical area (neighborhood), about strong blanket (not intermittent) interference for several hours. Chances are that this is leaking in broad spectrum, not just the 2.4 region. But perhaps I did not read the story correctly. As I recall, I had not yet finished my first pot of coffee.

    --
    Will
  182. 802.11n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a couple hundred and a quick google search you could get yourself on 5ghz 802.11n and forget the whole problem.

    We've got a WiSpy DBX, and 5Ghz is remarkably quiet anywhere I've checked. Choose a channel > 100 to avoid conflicting with 802.11a 5Ghz.

    Satellites don't hang around. They appear strongly and disappear quickly. I've "seen" them. Their bandwidth is, of course, limited and outside the three bands used for 5Ghz 802.11n.

    All my neighbors use 2.4Ghz ch 6. Ch11 is all mine.

  183. Intentional interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in college, I lived with several other people in a crappy, partially furnished old house. The microwave that came with the house must have been terribly shielded, because even being on the opposite side of the house from both me and the wireless router, it always knocked me offline.

    Fortunately, the house's second story was added haphazardly, and through some miracle the faulty wiring didn't kill us. Half of the outlets in my room were on the same circuit as the kitchen, half were on a separate circuit.

    It took me about a month of living there before I figured out the solution - buying a toaster oven from the thrift store and hiding it under my desk on an extension cord to the outlets on the other side of the room. Every time I had an important raid going on, or some other dire need for the internet, I popped on the toaster oven. The outlet would short out before it tripped my internet connection.

    Passive aggressive? Definitely. But they never figured it out. Wasteful? Not really. They were all cheap-ass hippies who kept the thermostat on 60 all winter (I guess technically I was too, being mildly complicit). Being upstairs in a poorly insulated house with no upstairs thermostat, my temperature would have been in the upper forties if it weren't for the steady hum of my computer and the five dollar toaster oven. Once winter passed, I finally broke down and ran CAT5 down the stairs, but I was happy killing two birds with one stone while it lasted.

  184. basic troubleshooting by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1
    This little bit of insight comes from years of troubleshooting over the phone.

    You don't happen to both run your routers on timer switches? Solar cells?

    Power company doing rolling blackouts? - nevermind, just checking.

  185. Cheap WiFi spec an (was: Re:report it to the fcc) by clanrat · · Score: 1

    Check out Ubiquiti's AirView product. $39 for a 2.4Ghz analyzer. No, really. I have a couple of these and they work. Granted, it's not a $24K Anritsu, but it will get you started. You may just need to switch channels, and this guy will show you if there's noise that it can hear.

  186. Bzzt! Those are not the lyrics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where can you see lions?
    only in Kenya
    come to Kenya we've got lions
    where can you see tigers?
    only in Kenya
    got lions and tigers only in Kenya
    forget Norway
    Kenyaaaaa
    oh Kenyaaaa
    where the giraffes are
    and the zebra
    Kenya Kenya Kenya Kenyaaaaa
    Kenya we're going to Kenya
    believe it

  187. Try Innsider by meClaudius · · Score: 1

    Try Innsider if Netstumbler fails. It is free and friendlier with WIFI cards. At least you can see if it is a WIFI signal. If it is interference and not a clear WIFI signal, then invest in a cheap spectrum analyzer like WI-Spy. Anyone have an ultrasonic alarm system around? http://www.metageek.net/docs/inssider-user-guide

  188. easy fix by sqkybeaver · · Score: 0

    move to an island a hundred miles away from any transmitting source, mix aluminum flakes in your paint paint the entire house, change the window screens to brass mesh, ground every electrical / electronic device with as short a grounding wire as possible. Or just take a second shift job where you will be working during the effected time.

  189. Re:Agree - Old wireless house phones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about zombie babies?

  190. And who reports it to the FCC ? by LandGator · · Score: 1

    Official Observers, experienced equipment-heavy hams with experience in signal tracing. The FCC relies on them to _gently_ monitor the airwaves in these days of modern times, when you can't tell the ACs from the DCs...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_Auxiliary

    http://www.rac.ca/en/rac/public-service/official-observers/

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  191. You have a WiFi problem ... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    ... but I don't have a WiFi problem. You've got the house wired for Cat5 too. My house is wired for Cat5, and has been for about a decade now.

    Here is how I avoid having WiFi problems : I don't use WiFi. I don't need it. so all the problems of remotely brickable routers, abysmal to pathetic security, and allowing the neighbours to jack off to MY porn collection - all of them just don't happen.

    There is an old, old joke that a medic student friend once told me :
    PATIENT : Doctor! Doctor! It hurts when I [do X].
    DOCTOR : Then don't [do X].

    Oh, sorry, that's not the solution you're looking for. Oh well, try the next room along the corridor. Bye.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  192. interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other things that can cause nasty interference on the 2.4.

    - Xbox wireless controllers
    - Wireless Keyboards and Mice
    - Someones Ham radio project?