From the summary: "People use technology more the less it feels like technology. 'The software gets more accepted when it works in human ways — meaning in noncomputer ways.'"
Take a world where you have a pen, and then you have a typewriter come along. The uptake in typewriters may have been relatively slow, taking a few decades, never really displaced the pen in many uses. Now computers replacing typewriters - a little faster. Internet replacing non-internet sources of information - definitely happened much faster. But in all these cases it is using technology that feels more like technology. So I don't know what he means by working in non-computer ways.
They might. I went into a large grocery store in a near by city a few weeks ago and saw gluten free bread (expected), but also yeast free bread — and it was not flat bread.
I am expecting them to come up with a bread free bread soon.
Perhaps companies that want to do business in country X end up paying taxes in country X instead of trying to scam their way out of it?
Government is not free, and nor is it superfluous.
Firefox is okay, but LibreOffice when compared to Office 2013 is a piece of shit. If she is still using Office 2003 or before, it might be viable, but 2007 and above - forget it. He doesn't want to change how she uses the computer.
Essentially yes. One is saying a fact, the other telling it to do something.
A good example is quick sort in Haskell vs C. In the former, you say what the sorted list looks like. In the latter you tell it the operations to perform.
After over ten years perusing this site, I have yet to form the opinion that editors edit the submissions in any way until there is a bunch of backlash from the comments about a minor transcription error. If there is a major error, it usually is not fixed.
The obvious answer to this is no, by the law of headlines. However, taking a look at the material does lend itself to the possibility of a good workflow. My own concerns would be with going from LaTeX now — there is some stuff on offer that could be quite excellent once further developed and supported.
There are many things about tumblr that are nice from the interface that is ideal way to present those things. But the ads will kill it. Somebody will reproduce it if it is that good, or forget it if alternatives come.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh how cute, you said death panel. Also government benefits are stealing from your neighbours. TIL!
From the summary: "People use technology more the less it feels like technology. 'The software gets more accepted when it works in human ways — meaning in noncomputer ways.'" Take a world where you have a pen, and then you have a typewriter come along. The uptake in typewriters may have been relatively slow, taking a few decades, never really displaced the pen in many uses. Now computers replacing typewriters - a little faster. Internet replacing non-internet sources of information - definitely happened much faster. But in all these cases it is using technology that feels more like technology. So I don't know what he means by working in non-computer ways.
I just started using microsoft's domain stuff on mine. Rather handy.
Are you going to trust what she says?
Sounds like useless bullshit produced to get funding dollars.
Probably GMO free lard.
They might. I went into a large grocery store in a near by city a few weeks ago and saw gluten free bread (expected), but also yeast free bread — and it was not flat bread. I am expecting them to come up with a bread free bread soon.
What a nice conspiracy theory you have there.
On another platform: yes.
Perhaps companies that want to do business in country X end up paying taxes in country X instead of trying to scam their way out of it? Government is not free, and nor is it superfluous.
Firefox is okay, but LibreOffice when compared to Office 2013 is a piece of shit. If she is still using Office 2003 or before, it might be viable, but 2007 and above - forget it. He doesn't want to change how she uses the computer.
How many write limits does this have?
Essentially yes. One is saying a fact, the other telling it to do something. A good example is quick sort in Haskell vs C. In the former, you say what the sorted list looks like. In the latter you tell it the operations to perform.
The people in charge of hiring at the big companies know some of the other recruiters and can actually fact check.
Time to grow up now.
I don't think you understand what Adobe Reader is.
"fastest GPU available with its fastest r9 for as little as $550 each" Well, I am glad that they are available for as little as that.
It means he knows more about what he is talking about than most of the commenters here.
This sounds remarkably like arguing for the broken window fallacy. In this case we are talking about windows that don't have to be broken anymore.
After over ten years perusing this site, I have yet to form the opinion that editors edit the submissions in any way until there is a bunch of backlash from the comments about a minor transcription error. If there is a major error, it usually is not fixed.
The obvious answer to this is no, by the law of headlines. However, taking a look at the material does lend itself to the possibility of a good workflow. My own concerns would be with going from LaTeX now — there is some stuff on offer that could be quite excellent once further developed and supported.
Coasters. I even got a letter printed in the local paper suggesting this.
There are many things about tumblr that are nice from the interface that is ideal way to present those things. But the ads will kill it. Somebody will reproduce it if it is that good, or forget it if alternatives come.
What purpose would a 400W cooler serve? Shouldn't we be trying to keep the heat down in the cpus themselves?
Why hunt to begin with? It is not like it is necessary for the vast majority and for game hunters the pleasure in animal suffering.