i came into this thread hoping to find a usable networked duplex printer since it looks like i may have to make yet a third frankenstein LJ4+ soon...for someone to say 'ah, you're forgetting about the...'
an aside. can someone tell me this 'finder' actually is. i'm a unix person who has been using mac osx for..say three years now. its great. but people keep talking about this 'finder' thing as if its an essential part of the os. is it just the dumb thing than manages the dock. the thing that manages the stupid modal 'active application state'? the silly little file browser?
new? 10 inches from my head i have a 2 volume collection edited by shapiro called 'concurrent prolog' published in 1986 which uses the concept of named streams to communicate between concurrent processes, which to a large extent are treated as variables in the language. i could find an earlier reference, but it would be more work than turning 60 degrees.
no, they dont really. as much as i love the dot project, its really not the worlds best general purpose graph drawer. it also turns out to be very subjective depending on the planarization approximation to generate something that looks clean or messy.
so if you just build a dynamic call graph and run it through dot (having done this before many times myself), you cant really say that the overall visual impression leaves you any more informed than you were before.
put it this way, do you really know anything more about the respective implementations from looking at these pictures aside from the false generalization that windows is 'messier' than linux? no, you dont.
while reading your post i thought you were talking about the design an integrity of the various software APIs that mark of the structural boundaries inside of any large system. and i thought 'not enough'.
then i realized you were talking about lickable buttony slidy things that make noises.
so you think the situation under bayh-dole where the university is supposed to be legally obliged to patent it and license it is really much better? do you know what its like to have your phd work sold off to the higest bidder before you can even finish it and get your doctorate? to have university lawyer sniffing around your work area looking for things that might be patentable. to not be able to open source simple tools because something thinks they are required to try and sell them off? to have to have your academic papers reviewed by techical lawyers as if you were in a company?
commericalization does get some fruits of research in front on the public that may not have bene otherwise, but its also in almost direct opposition to the normal academic model of frank and open discussion.
get the 2gb, parallels just flails painfully with only 1, although i haven't tried turning down the guest size very low. just upgraded to 2 and both oses are very usable..except for an occasional usage spike that i can't really explain.
learn how to do metaprogramming. learn how to write operating systems, compilers, and design languages. then when you have to do some random server-side crap, you can do it less time, with greater extensibility and stability, and have more fun doing it.
or you can spend the rest of your life spitting out the same little balls of php.
this whole thing is just ridiculous. yes, sure if you treat existing poorly engineered systems as inviolate and try to work around them its a never ending battle. but the basic tools to provide systemic distributed security have been published for quite some time. fix the problem at its source and stop screwing around.
yes, pkis are not flawless, but it would be a huge step above this kind of flailing
most other open source organizations are perfectly happy to accept gpl'd contributions, which include the right to redistribute. its normally not necessary to assign the ownership to the parent organization. this is a direct result of the company asserting its ownership rights over the source and all derivitives, in direct contradition to the spirit of the gpl. again, to assert that this is a legal neccessity is duplicitous. you are trying to keep and eat your cake. great if you can get away with it, but its not free as in libre...until a community arises around a fork.
yes, i fully understand that you are a company. but you didn't answer the question as to what degree that company nature, and the contributors licence dilutes the gpl. its a bit disingenous to assert that its just about liability, as you demand that contributors assign all rights, so that you can distribute an alternative license, including this code, for a fee.
are you really open source? its lovely that one can look at the source, and that its gpld, but in order to get to the mainline, one must agree to a 'contributors license' which assign all rights to mysql ad. a bit of a dodge?
i saw the headline and was wondering why a pulse code modulation interface would have anything to do with the underlying storage technology, and why it would be a good idea in the first place.
i think there is some danger of that. section 7 in particular i found very disturbing, writing unix-style script execution syntax into the language. its clear that they are going for pragmatism and adoption rather than the clarity that was present in the earlier definition.
frankly really i wish they had just stuck to core+sfri (and left hygenic macros as an sfri)
5 years from now when you've moved on, frankly i'd much rather have a first-year-college-grad state machine in front of me than some line noise that happened to be supported in perl 6.0.23.7 alpha 4
Slashdot Mirror
i came into this thread hoping to find a usable networked duplex printer ...'
since it looks like i may have to make yet a third frankenstein
LJ4+ soon...for someone to say 'ah, you're forgetting about the
damn.
an aside. can someone tell me this 'finder' actually is. i'm
a unix person who has been using mac osx for..say three years
now. its great. but people keep talking about this 'finder' thing
as if its an essential part of the os. is it just the dumb thing
than manages the dock. the thing that manages the stupid modal
'active application state'? the silly little file browser?
damn. and i thought it was a coalition of gay, scheme programming,
train buffs.
new? 10 inches from my head i have a 2 volume collection edited by
shapiro called 'concurrent prolog' published in 1986 which uses the concept of named
streams to communicate between concurrent processes, which to a
large extent are treated as variables in the language. i could
find an earlier reference, but it would be more work than turning 60 degrees.
try harder
sorry, i missed that definition. what is that in library of congresses per human hair?
or maybe its actually really hard, or arguably impossible, to use data-parallel machines for general purpose computing?
no, they dont really. as much as i love the dot project, its really not the
worlds best general purpose graph drawer. it also turns out to be very subjective
depending on the planarization approximation to generate something that looks
clean or messy.
so if you just build a dynamic call graph and run it through dot (having done this
before many times myself), you cant really say that the overall visual impression
leaves you any more informed than you were before.
put it this way, do you really know anything more about the respective implementations
from looking at these pictures aside from the false generalization that windows
is 'messier' than linux? no, you dont.
here is maybe a good answer.
while reading your post i thought you were talking about the design an integrity of the various software APIs that mark of the structural boundaries inside of any large system. and i thought 'not enough'.
then i realized you were talking about lickable buttony slidy things that make noises.
so you think the situation under bayh-dole where the university is supposed to be
legally obliged to patent it and license it is really much better? do you know what
its like to have your phd work sold off to the higest bidder before you can even
finish it and get your doctorate? to have university lawyer sniffing around your
work area looking for things that might be patentable. to not be able to open
source simple tools because something thinks they are required to try and sell them
off? to have to have your academic papers reviewed by techical lawyers as if you
were in a company?
commericalization does get some fruits of research in front on the public that may
not have bene otherwise, but its also in almost direct opposition to the normal
academic model of frank and open discussion.
you contradict yourself somewhat. corruption is the behaviour that arises naturally from the system. it isn't really an intent in and of itself.
get the 2gb, parallels just flails painfully with only 1, although i haven't tried turning down the guest size very low. just upgraded to 2 and both oses are very usable..except for an occasional usage spike that i can't really explain.
you mean 'installed' or 'created'?
does anyone know where to actually get the specs?
s/belief/intent
there. now its all legal.
grandparent is correct.
learn how to do metaprogramming. learn how to write operating systems, compilers,
and design languages. then when you have to do some random server-side crap, you
can do it less time, with greater extensibility and stability, and have more
fun doing it.
or you can spend the rest of your life spitting out the same little balls of
php.
this whole thing is just ridiculous. yes, sure if you treat existing poorly engineered systems as inviolate and try to work around them its a never ending battle. but the basic tools to provide systemic distributed security have been published for quite some time. fix the problem at its source and stop screwing around.
yes, pkis are not flawless, but it would be a huge step above this kind of flailing
most other open source organizations are perfectly happy to accept gpl'd
contributions, which include the right to redistribute. its normally not
necessary to assign the ownership to the parent organization. this is a
direct result of the company asserting its ownership rights over the source
and all derivitives, in direct contradition to the spirit of the gpl. again,
to assert that this is a legal neccessity is duplicitous. you are trying
to keep and eat your cake. great if you can get away with it, but its not
free as in libre...until a community arises around a fork.
i've always found bcd quite easy. just throw away a large fraction of the legitimate encodings...wait, what?
yes, i fully understand that you are a company. but you didn't answer the question as to what degree that company nature, and the contributors licence dilutes the gpl.
its a bit disingenous to assert that its just about liability, as you demand that
contributors assign all rights, so that you can distribute an alternative license,
including this code, for a fee.
no really. read the code. its all one large defect.
are you really open source? its lovely that one can look at the source,
and that its gpld, but in order to get to the mainline, one must agree
to a 'contributors license' which assign all rights to mysql ad.
a bit of a dodge?
i saw the headline and was wondering why a pulse code modulation interface would have anything to do with the underlying storage technology, and why it would be a good idea in the first place.
of course we all know that the us dod is a monolithic
entity that only holds one opinion about anything.
i think there is some danger of that. section 7 in particular i found
very disturbing, writing unix-style script execution syntax into
the language. its clear that they are going for pragmatism and adoption
rather than the clarity that was present in the earlier definition.
frankly really i wish they had just stuck to core+sfri (and left
hygenic macros as an sfri)
5 years from now when you've moved on, frankly i'd much
rather have a first-year-college-grad state machine
in front of me than some line noise that happened to
be supported in perl 6.0.23.7 alpha 4