Slashdot Mirror


Hans Reiser to Sell Company

DVega writes "Due to increasing legal costs, murder suspect Hans Reiser is seeking to sell his company. His lawyer William DuBois said he is running out of money to pay for his defense. DuBois added, 'This is a unique opportunity for someone to buy the company for pennies on the dollar. We welcome all vultures.' This is a good opportunity to own a filesystem and rename it after your own."

583 comments

  1. Heh,, by aero2600-5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    AeroFS.. I bet that would bring a lawsuit from Microsoft..

    Aero

    --
    Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    1. Re:Heh,, by bubbl07 · · Score: 1

      ...or iFS, but that would probably bring a lawsuit from Apple or Linksys (although most likely the former)...

    2. Re:Heh,, by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      AeroFS.. I bet that would bring a lawsuit from Microsoft..

      I believe Aero is simply a user interface branding, barely even software-related but more about design.
      While the filesystem would be purely software related. It could actually be interesting to watch. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Heh,, by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I believe Aero is simply a user interface branding, barely even software-related but more about design.
      While the filesystem would be purely software related. It could actually be interesting to watch. ;-) Yeah. As long as you're not the one paying the defense lawyer's fees. :-P
      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  2. Nice quote by aztektum · · Score: 3, Funny

    DuBois added, 'This is a unique opportunity for someone to buy the company for pennies on the dollar. We welcome all vultures.'

    There's one hell of a joke about lawyers being vultures themselves, unfortunately the fact that a lawyer of all people said this has rendered my brain unable to make it.

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:Nice quote by 13bPower · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's even funnier because he has to sell the company to pay the lawyer.

    2. Re:Nice quote by Dachannien · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the phrase you're looking for is "takes one to know one".

  3. DHFS! by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Death-Hallow File System, natch.

    1. Re:DHFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VultureFS

  4. Mising poll option by iriefrank · · Score: 5, Funny

    CowboyNealFS?

  5. Why pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    er, couldn't you just fork it and rename it whatever you want for free?

    1. Re:Why pay for that? by doom · · Score: 5, Informative
      Anonymous Coward wrote:
      er, couldn't you just fork it and rename it whatever you want for free?

      Provided you licensed it under the GPL, yes, you could do that.

      The copyright holder has additional options, however -- Hans Reiser says that he actually makes some money selling the right to use his file system without telling anyone else that they're using it.

      (Yes I know, but the corporate world is weird.)

      Also, if you RTFM, you'll see that they mention proprietary add-on products, such as a file compressor

    2. Re:Why pay for that? by jarich · · Score: 1
      Wasn't it Oracle that was buying up rights to database formats not too long ago... this kinda-sorta falls into the same category.

      But if an Oracle/MS type company bought it, it was just disapear or fork, then disapear. Too many alternatives.

    3. Re:Why pay for that? by igb · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Hans Reiser says that he actually makes some money selling the right to use his file system without telling anyone else that they're using it.

      (Yes I know, but the corporate world is weird.)

      I've got one of the machines that is covertly Reiser4 under the hood, I believe. I can see why a vendor would want to keep it quiet, too.
      • Firstly, the admission that you don't own the filesystem (in the sense of employing all the major contributors) is a worry for many customers.
      • Secondly, if you want to put your own secret sauce into the filesystem (perhaps hooking it more intimately into your product's volume management, or providing a shortcut API into your block level IO, or doing extra things for fast failover between control units, or whatever) then you don't want to have to pass this stuff out GPL'd.
      • And finally, if you want to use an otherwise-GPL'd filesystem linked into a non-GPL real-time executive like VxWorks (no relation to VxFS, confusingly) or QNX, having a non-GPL version of the filesystem probably saves everyone a lot of lawyers bills.
      I'm not sure I approve of this as a GPL enthusiast --- hey, I had code on the Emacs 17.61 tape! --- but as a customer I don't think I care too much. You don't get to have much oversight of the components used in products you buy unless you're entering into the wild world of source escrow, and buying a non-GPL'd version of a GPL'd product is no different to the OEM buying something completely closed, and in many ways better (I still get the many-eyes thing, up to a point).

      ian

    4. Re:Why pay for that? by paulpach · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I approve of this as a GPL enthusiast
      1. Who are you to approve or disapprove? Your only rights over that code are those given to you by the copyright holders, they have the right of licensing it under any terms they want including "User must wear chicken suit to use this software" license. Saying you don't approve means you don't think a developer should have the right to license his own creation under his own terms (RMS kind of freaky thought).
      2. This benefits everybody, including you. Namesys wins by getting revenew. The companies who license this win as you very well explained. You win because Namesys can stay in business and keep providing you with the GPL version of their hard work.
      3. There are not that many successfull business models with GPL. If they found one and it works for them, more power to them. This has plenty of precedent such as Trolltech, mysql, sun and others (google for dual license)
      4. you and everybody else are free to fork reiserfs if you don't like how they are doing business, _THEY_ are giving you that freedom by licensing under GPL.
      5. you have _more_ options with this. Instead of being restricted by the GPL, you can choose to license under whatever other option they provide.

      While I find the rest of you post interesting , I have issues with people feeling compelled to condemn this practice.

    5. Re:Why pay for that? by igb · · Score: 1
      Perhaps British understatement isn't the flavour today. ``I'm not sure I approve'' just means I haven't thought about it terribly hard. To get from there to a rant about the desire to snatch copyrights from the hands of starving children seems a bit of a reach. I agree with evey one of your points. I'm not sure why you felt the need to assume I didn't.

      My uncertainty comes from the following scenario:

      1. I release my product under the GPL.
      2. Various people beta test, patch, enhance and generally improve my product, believing it to be GPL'd.
      3. I then dual-license as a commerical offering to those that want it.
      Now yes, you could argue that the people submitting patches knew the score, or that if they had reservations about possible license changes they should have made appropriate legal moves. And certainly this pattern of events is neither illegal nor (for most people) immoral. But the point is that the value I would be selling is partly due to the improvements that other people donated, and I'm not sure I approve. ``I'm not sure'', note, so try to avoid the hyperbole of stacked assumptions starting from my being sure. The issue isn't the main author's work, it's the intangible value created by the work of others.

      Mind you ``Revenue? GPL enthusiasts can't even spell it'' is a tempting cheap shot.

      ian

    6. Re:Why pay for that? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      And certainly this pattern of events is neither illegal nor (for most people) immoral.

      As you described It, sounds to me, it would be both a violation of copyright law, and a violation of the GPL. Unless you just forget step 2.5 where the company compensates the contributers in some way to get them to sign over the rights of their code to the company.

      I know nothing of how riserFS handles their dual license, but the others don't allow bug submissions, or reports, from outside submitters who haven't first agreed (which involved signed, witnessed hard copies of a release.) to assign all rights to the respective company.

      Sans the agreement anyone of course is welcome to update the code, and GPL only license the derivative product, but they have to have a agreement from every contributer to every go back to a non gpl compatible license of that derivative.

      Thats where the new owner would have to be worried, if they didn't keep the developers (and thus weren't trusted by the community) the GPL only version would soon have all the value, and the company would just have a old version of code many are afraid to use.

      then again IANL
    7. Re:Why pay for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, didn't the babe already get forked?

    8. Re:Why pay for that? by doom · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked into it, but I would guess that the Reiser projects would simply refuse any patches from someone who is unwilling to assign copyright over to NameSys, just as the FSF projects do (though for slightly different reasons: the FSF feels the need to hold copyright in order to have legal standing to go after GPL violations).

      And myself, I definitely disapprove of the practice of proprietary cross-licensing of GPL'd code, but there's no way to prohibit the practice, and at least Hans Reiser is quite up front about what he's doing.

      The trouble with the practice is that it's something of a violation of the spirit of the GPL, which is directed toward creating an open community centered around the software. A software project that is advertised as being under the GPL has an implicit promise that it will remain a free and open project -- it is poor form (though not legally prohibited, as far as I know) for the developers to suddenly announce that all future versions of a project will no longer be released under the GPL. Even users that don't contribute code still effectively contribute to the project: they provide bug reports, useability feedback, acts as an unpaid advertising force. They're members of a community that may have no legal say in how the project is run, but myself, I think there's something of an ethical burden on the developers to avoid jerking them around.

      But clearly Hans Reiser has a different opinion about the details of his obligations, and he's the guy who started these projects... and I hope the projects continue some way or another. I'm a fan of ReiserFS 3 (I find I'm now addicted to directory filesizes that actually reflect the size of their contents), and I've been looking forward to playing with Reiser 4 plug-ins sometime....

  6. Obligatory bad joke by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Lucas makes a movie about this, be sure to wear your "Hans shot first" t-shirts.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Obligatory bad joke by noz · · Score: 1
      When Lucas makes a movie about this, be sure to wear your "Hans shot first" t-shirts.
      Is this consistent with Porn Wars?
  7. An opportunity for someone by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 4, Funny

    to make a killing.

    1. Re:An opportunity for someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess someone will have to take a stab at running his company.

      P.S. the word in the image was "widowed"

  8. Bad choice of lawyer... by reset_button · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:Bad choice of lawyer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he can play the "life" card.

    2. Re:Bad choice of lawyer... by vox_soli · · Score: 1

      Obviously, so he can have his zombie lawyer eat the prosecutor's brain.

  9. Unintended pun? by BigDumbAnimal · · Score: 5, Funny

    he's seeking to sell off his open-source file system company, Namesys, to help pay mounting legal costs.
    1. Re:Unintended pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit, i parsed that as the cost of sex :/

    2. Re:Unintended pun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well you could say that "mounting" is the root cause of Hans' troubles, in an indirect way :)

    3. Re:Unintended pun? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      he's seeking to sell off his open-source file system company, Namesys, to help pay mounting legal costs.

      Too bad you can't fsck a mounted filesystem.

  10. This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he turns out to be innocent, it will be just that much sadder -- he will have lost his wife and be ruined. A justice system that is so where money often plays such a key role in influencing the outcome is a very disfunctional justice system.

    1. Re:This is sad ... by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you win against the govt criminal charges, isnt the govt required to pay all YOUR costs and compensate you for the hassel?

      After all, if YOU LOOSE, you have to pay the government court costs.

      I know its like this for small petty charges in au, or is USA run by evil lawyers?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      actually, I thought the opposite. It's sad that someone may be able to buy his way out of a murder conviction and walk away a free man.

    3. Re:This is sad ... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Would it be a better justice system if all the best lawyers were eliminated, so that they were all the same low quality and low price?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    4. Re:This is sad ... by tonyr1988 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      or is USA run by evil lawyers?
      You must be new here.
    5. Re:This is sad ... by shystershep · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, no to both the first two (yes to the evil lawyer thing). You don't have to pay a dime of the government's court costs, win or lose. And you have a right to a free lawyer if you can't afford one.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    6. Re:This is sad ... by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      A justice system that is so where money often plays such a key role in influencing the outcome is a very disfunctional justice system.

      It's not a justice system, it's a legal system. Viewed from that perspective, it suddenly makes a lot more sense, because that perspective makes it clear who the system serves (hint: it's not the people of the U.S.).

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    7. Re:This is sad ... by theMerovingian · · Score: 5, Funny


      A truck driver frequently traveled through a small town where there was a courthouse at the side of the road. Of course, there were always lawyers walking along the road. The truck driver made it a practice to hit any pedestrian lawyers with his truck as he sped by.

      One day, he spotted a priest walking along the road and stopped to give him a ride. A little further along, as he approached the town, he spotted a lawyer walking along the side of the road.

      Automatically, he veered his truck towards the lawyer, but...then he remembered his passenger. He swerved back to the center, but he heard a "whump" and in the rear view mirror he spotted the lawyer rolling across the field.

      He turned to the priest and said, "Father, I'm sure that I missed that lawyer!"

      And the priest replied, "That's OK, my son, I got him with the door.

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    8. Re:This is sad ... by powerlinekid · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the evidence it doesn't look like hes very innocent.

      Blood found in his mother's house and a sleeping bag found in his car match his former wife's

      Prior history of aggression toward her which led to a restraining order.

      A motive in that he has been trying to get custody of his children and they will not give them to him.

      And of course this gem from SFgate:

      Hans Reiser's Honda was missing its front passenger seat when police seized it Sept. 19, Cavness testified in an Oakland courtroom. After technicians removed the carpeting from the front seat area, they noticed that the floorboard had been saturated with water, Cavness said.

      Inside the car, police found a 40-piece socket set, Cavness said. The tools appeared to have been used to remove four bolts that had been used to attach the passenger seat to the floor, she said.

      Also found inside the car, according to police, was a roll of trash bags, masking tape, a siphon pump, absorbent towels and two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.


      All in all, I'd say its not looking good for him.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    9. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Also found inside the car, according to police, was a roll of trash bags, masking tape, a siphon pump, absorbent towels and two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.

      Apparently there was nothing in those books about disposing of evidence.

    10. Re:This is sad ... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Probably. Having fairly evenly matched lawyers on each side, whether equally good or equally bad, would probably result in more cases being decided correctly.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    11. Re:This is sad ... by illuminatedwax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That actually sounds really suspicious - the addition of the books is way too much.

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    12. Re:This is sad ... by powerlinekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My thought exactly...

      Its especially interesting because hes supposed to be a smart guy. You'd think the last thing you want to do is purchase a book about homicide investigations when you think you're the main suspect in a homicide investigation.

      Yeah yeah, maybe he wanted to know how to procede and was honestly curious in a non-sinister way. It still looks extremely suspicious.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    13. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 5, Informative

      As has been said, nope.

      Win or lose, you pay your own lawyer fees (which, if you go with the court-appointed attorney, is free,) and any fine. The fine is *NOT* considered paying back court costs, it is a deterrent.

      And you can only get your money back (and compensation for the hassle,) if you sue the government for wrongful prosecution and win. Basically, you have to prove that the government charged you when they knew you were innocent. (i.e. if they charge someone with murder, knowing full well that the accused didn't do it, because they know that the accused knows who did it. So they are charging one person with murder SOLELY to get that person to break and testify against someone else.) The trick, of course, is PROVING that the government KNEW that you were innocent. If they had even the slightest shred of circumstantial evidence, it can be hard to win one of these cases. (I was on a jury for one of these once. It was rather obvious that the government PROBABLY knew, but that wasn't enough to find against the government. The judge's instructions were very clear.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    14. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In the South, that joke is told. The difference is that "lawyer" is replace with "'black person" or some other word that refers to a black person. No, I'm not kidding. I've heard it with my own ears.

    15. Re:This is sad ... by Broken+scope · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really? maybe in civil court. Prosecutors have this thing called reasonable doubt they have to deal with. With an intelligent jury who understands that concept, the prosecution has a much harder time than the defense.

      I blame the jury. Stupid jury.

      --
      You mad
    16. Re:This is sad ... by jesboat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not sad at all that he should be able to buy his way out of a murder conviction if he's innocent.

      It'll be sad if he buys his way out of the conviction when he's guilty, but we don't know that he's guilty yet.

      It's saddest for you to assume that he's guilty and if he'd need to buy his way out of a murder conviction if he's innocent.

    17. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there's his rants about "death yoga"...

    18. Re:This is sad ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Its especially interesting because hes supposed to be a smart guy

      Most of us who have seen CSI would assume that the car can not be adequately cleaned well enough to fool the cops. Better for it to be "stolen" and theb set on fire

      Of course murdering somebody is a stupid thing to do, so it is natural for the coverup to be stupid as well.

    19. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is smart during killing their wife. Be it spontaneous crime of passion or a thoroughly planned murder, most of the people get really nervous and make a lot of mistakes. Ever read Crime & Punishment?

    20. Re:This is sad ... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Mind you, one must get the government's permission to sue it...
      conflict of interest? what conflict?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    21. Re:This is sad ... by ozbird · · Score: 5, Funny

      All in all, I'd say its not looking good for him.

      Are you sure? Try this Cluedo on for size: "Mr Ballmer, in the Honda, with the front seat."

    22. Re:This is sad ... by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Apparently there was nothing in those books about disposing of evidence."

      To be fair, it would appear that there was no direct evidence in the car. Problem is, like most ultra-super-uber-freaky_cool-keen-whazit geeks he attacked the problem programatically, and the circumstancial evidence was an unhandled exception. Talk about kernal panic!
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    23. Re:This is sad ... by iocat · · Score: 1

      No. Then it would all be who you knew, and who they were pals with. A justice system where money buys you more justice is bad, but it's better than the alternative of a system where who you know gets more justice (aka the "justice" systems in much of the world)

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    24. Re:This is sad ... by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a difference between being clever and being smart.

    25. Re:This is sad ... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      There are no winners in the american justice system. Once the cops put the handcuffs on you the best possible outcome is that you will be found not guilty after a trial. At the end of that process you will have lost all your money, your house, your job, your friends, and (not in this case of course) most likely your wife and family.

      That's the best possible outcome.

      The worst possible outcome is that you will be found guilty and gang raped repeatedly in prison. In america any jail sentence carries with it an adjunct punishment of rape.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    26. Re:This is sad ... by rastos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point is that "you can afford one" as long as you have any property. You have to spend it all, before you are entitled to ex-offo. When all is said and done, you are left with nothing. Even if you win.

    27. Re:This is sad ... by asuffield · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The really sad part is that if he's found guilty, the system will still be just as broken, but people will think it's fair. Which is why the system remains broken.

    28. Re:This is sad ... by deblau · · Score: 1

      That's a whole lot of evidence that her body was carried in the car and dumped somewhere, then the car cleaned. It seems pretty clear a crime was committed in his car. I can't find anything in that long list that ties him to the crime. Maybe they have some harder evidence, and who knows, they convicted Scott Peterson. In the meantime, innocent until proven guilty and all that.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    29. Re:This is sad ... by sentientbrendan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >It's sad that someone may be able to buy his way out of a
      >murder conviction and walk away a free man.

      Well, money can't buy you anything more than a fair trial, but lack of money pretty much guarantees that you are screwed, even if the evidence against you is minimal. All that money does, is guarantee that your lawyers are competent, and that you have the resources to dig up evidence on your behalf.

      Now, there are other things you can do to get out of a murder conviction, like be a loved celebrity, or have political power.

    30. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's saddest that O.J. is walking free!

      ^^Fixed that for you.

    31. Re:This is sad ... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      he knew for several days the police were going to investigate him...he had plenty of time to clean these things up! leaving sloppy evidence like book and tools in the car doesn't make sense. The wife was also known for playing very dirty also and milking it for all it was worth before the divorce was final(the sfgate news mentioned that earlier in the case) She did the usual "husband is beating me" routine but as they described it, it was almost fake (impression from news at the time)... but of course police take the report out on the MAN's fault, and because of that HE has to move out of his house, and HE can't have the kids.. even though everybody KNOWS the reports of abuse are fake or not fully true. She was cheating on him...in his house! and he had to get a new one. She was killed when the kids were with him... that almost points to the boyfriend as the suspect or a paid hit. It's almost like the OJ thing.. the setup evidence is almost TOO good... but pinning the suspect to the actual crime doesn't fit the time tables of where the POLICE say everybody was at. It's like the ex-wife did all the hard work to set the guy up as a bad guy for the divorce, but was living the wild life with somebody else... it's like a gift-wrapped mob hit and the police are falling for it while they have coffee with the real killer at the doughnut shop.

      I'm not saying he couln't have done it, but it's like the OJ case.. soon we'll be finding the police lab "embelished" some reports...mislabled where evidence came from...etc. once that happens, the police have failed to do their duty of running a clean show and you HAVE to let him go not knowing if the police lied, or just did crappy work. His reputation is stained forever, So they just bleed him dry with legal fees and call it good. Nobody gets BANNED from law enforcement for deliberately screwing up the trial!!! That's what's sick with the whole system right now.

    32. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he knew for several days the police were going to investigate him...he had plenty of time to clean these things up! leaving sloppy evidence like book and tools in the car doesn't make sense.

      90% of crimes are solves as the criminals are dumb or forget something in the heat of the moment.

    33. Re:This is sad ... by MrWa · · Score: 1
      Also found inside the car, according to police, was a roll of trash bags, masking tape, a siphon pump, absorbent towels and two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.

      Note to self: destroy copies of "Smartest Guys in the Room" and "Corporate Crime" after installing my program to skim the excess fractional pennies due to rounding bank transactions.

    34. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > After all, if YOU LOOSE, you have to pay the government court costs.

      What do you mean by loose? In what way is he not tight?

    35. Re:This is sad ... by oo · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...The judge's instructions were very clear.)

      Please don't forget that a judge's instructions are worthless and that you as a member of the jury have all the power and the final say. You have the power to decide whether a law is just or unjust and are free to ignore it and do as you wish. Anything that comes out of the judge's mouth means diddly-squat. What the law says means diddly-squat. You create the law if you're on a jury.

      Google for "jury nullification" if you want more info.

    36. Re:This is sad ... by mashmorgan · · Score: 1

      Doesn't he get State funded legal aid like in the UK ?? One cannot fight the state with a bottomless pit of money.

    37. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree. I got to talk about this case with the former chief justice of the state where I'm from, and he said that what the police claim to have found "didn't pass the smell test." He said first thing he would have done while on the bench was suggest to the defense attorney that he investigate the background into each of the cops involved. He said he'd bet even odds that one of them is dirty and has planted evidence before.

      A good friend of mine that teaches law at Duke (he has an EE degree which is why he keeps-up with Linux) has the theory that it was a setup by the wife. He said that in fifteen years as a prosecutor in Durham, NC (which has a high murder rate), not once did he ever see a murder case this straight forward. He just doesn't believe anyone would leave such a large collection of varied damning evidence in their car.

    38. Re:This is sad ... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      That's true. Criminal cases are weighed pretty heavily in favor of the defendant. Even so, I still suspect that litigators one side being dramatically better than the others does nothing for the overall quality of our legal system.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    39. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > She was killed when the kids were with him... that almost points to the boyfriend as the suspect or a paid hit.

      If he didn't do it, then maybe she had not been killed ? I mean, the probable options are:

      * he did it and was very stupid
      * she trapped him, spilled blood and books in the car, and is walking fine somewhere in russia
      * somone else did it with his car [but it would have been more efficient to leave the body]

      Now, the strange things are:

      * Who did buy those books ? If he did, that rules out part of #2
      * What does he says about the state of the car ? Did he found blood, and washed it himself ? In that case why did he left the books ? Or does he pretend now knowing how it occured ? In that case, he noticed after the disparition [because he went looking for his wife with his car] ? Then, why didn't he at least removed the incriminating books ?

      All this is very suspicious. It almost looks like he wanted to incriminate himself, then point to the amount of evidence and say "I could have done this, I am not this stupid"...

    40. Re:This is sad ... by CoderDevo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also found inside the car, according to police, was a roll of trash bags, masking tape, a siphon pump, absorbent towels and two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.

      Lastly, a box containing the first two drafts of "How I did it," by Hans Reiser.

    41. Re:This is sad ... by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I forget the legal term for it, but I believe a judge can set aside a jury verdict also. It's also leaving the judge open to review, and is likely to be grounds for a mistrial, retrial or appeal (whatever the appropriate legal term is). So it works both ways.


      Kirby

    42. Re:This is sad ... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 0

      At least from what I've investigated, the facts look pretty solid that he's guilty.

    43. Re:This is sad ... by powerlinekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Basic timeline...

      September 3rd: She goes Missing
      September 8th: He buys the books
      September 12th: He gets pulled over and police note he has a passenger seat.
      September 19th: They impound his car, this time passenger seat is gone.

      So it would seem that regardless of who did what when, he had a need to clean his car sometime between the 12th and 19th. Which is 9 + days after she went missing...

      Very strange. I can't think of many fit of passion murders where it takes up to that long to dispose of a body, if it was him who did it. It suggests to me that with that kind of time, they probably will never find it. Which is a shame.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    44. Re:This is sad ... by shadowmas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True it's sad to see an guilty person walk free.

      But it's sadder to see a innocent person goto prison.

    45. Re:This is sad ... by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      One more thing...

      I can't see a reason for her to fake her death.

      She would of gotten her divorce. So she would of been entitled to pretty much whatever she wanted along with receiving the kids. Faking her death... its not like she gets a life insurance check for that. She also throws away whatever else she was entitled to.

      The only possible reason I could see it is if really wanted to fuck him over, but this is a bit extreme. I guess it would be the ultimate vengence but damn... outside of that stupid double jeopardy movie I can't really think of anything like that.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    46. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the South, that joke is told. The difference is that "lawyer" is replace with "'black person" or some other word that refers to a black person. No, I'm not kidding. I've heard it with my own ears.

      A friend of mine described these as "hate jokes". That is, they have no intrinsic humor other than delight at suffering. The substitution of "nigger" for "lawyer" that you describe is how you tell if a joke is in this category.

      While they can be mildly amusing ("What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?"), to me they indicate a lazy humorist.

    47. Re:This is sad ... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      If you win, you are left with your life and your freedom in capital cases like this. That's more than nothing.

      --
      C|N>K
    48. Re:This is sad ... by Omnifarious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suspect he did it myself, but I'm willing to wait for the outcome of a trial to find out.

      In truth, though I think OJ was guilty, I also think the verdict was a just one. The LA police completely flubbed the whole thing. I think they tried to frame a guilty man in large part because of the color of his skin, but also because of an attitude just like yours. They weren't willing to wait for a trial.

      So, though I have my opinion here, he needs to convicted by a jury who has heard all the evidence before I will treat it as fact. Our legal system exists for a reason.

      It truly is sad that OJ would've been convicted, even with the LA police's botching, if he hadn't had a ton of money. Nobody should've been convicted after they messed with the evidence in the way they did.

    49. Re:This is sad ... by flinkflonk · · Score: 1

      A justice system where money buys you more justice is bad, but it's better than the alternative of a system where who you know gets more justice

      Hmm, I don't see the difference.

      A system where money buys you more justice, and a system where you buy friends (*cough*IranContra*cough*Halliburton*cough**cough* ) to get you said justice (however wrong your perception of said justice may be)?

      Have you ever considered a system where objective application of the laws is the primary objective of the courts? No? Why not?

    50. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Blood found in his mother's house and a sleeping bag found in his car match his former wife's

      Harks of the Azaria Chamberlain case in Australia. Blood of child in family car. Conviction. 12 years gaol. New evidence. Acquittal. The blood in the car was a complete bum steer.

      As you would expect family members do bleed in things like cars and sleeping bags (cut fingers, bloody noses, ...)

      In short, assumption is the mother of all fuck up, and fuckups include gaoling the wrong person. Let the court do its job.

    51. Re:This is sad ... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      He turned to the priest and said, "Father, I'm sure that I missed that lawyer!"

      The Australian version has Aboriginals instead of lawyers. Since you're rather more likely to be passing Aboriginals on a country road while driving a truck than lawyers, I think the lawyer version is a fairly lame fork of the original racist joke.

    52. Re:This is sad ... by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Funny
      Note to self: destroy copies of "Smartest Guys in the Room" and "Corporate Crime" after installing my program to skim the excess fractional pennies due to rounding bank transactions.

      Don't forget to get rid of your Superman III and Office Space videos.

    53. Re:This is sad ... by Duds · · Score: 1

      You had that before you were arrested for no reason.

      You can of course then sue for malicious prosecution.

    54. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For crying out fucking loud it's LOSE, not LOOSE.
      What is so difficult about this that nobody seems able to use the correct word anymore?

    55. Re:This is sad ... by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Doesn't he get State funded legal aid like in the UK ?? One cannot fight the state with a bottomless pit of money.
      He certainly can, I think all "western" countries have this kind of disposition in their legal system. However a state appointed lawyer may very well not be very involved in your case, since he likely has a lot of similar ones on his hands for a miserable pay. Not to mention that he can also be incompetent, be someone you don't agree or get along with, etc.
      There are lots of reasons to get a dedicated lawyer. There is however no reason why this should be such an expensive (as in have to sell all your assets and go live under a bridge) proposition.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    56. Re:This is sad ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      What we haven't heard is if he has an explanation for why the seat is missing. The news, especially when driven by the police press reports, tends to leave that sort of information out.

      I can easily think of one possibility right off the top of my head - he left the window down and/or the door open and some animal like a cat or racoon climbed in and took a piss all over the seat. That's the kind of thing that would cause me to just chuck the seat and saturate the floorboards with water and probably some other chemicals.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    57. Re:This is sad ... by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Ever noticed how all the evidence seems to point to the Earth revolving around the Sun? Nothing which has that much evidence going for it could possibly be true, it's just too open and shut...

      If it turns out he's innocent (conclusively), great! But those books, cleaning out the passenger seat, the bin liners.. Right now it looks more like first degree murder than a heat of the moment accident, which is even more disgusting in someone who's intelligent.
      It's irrational, but the fact that I've used his software makes it all the more uncomfortable.

      Before I get "innocent until/unless proven guilty"; just because jurors should absolutely reserve judgment until they come to a verdict doesn't mean that we can't speculate on the likely outcome, and right now the outcome looks very likely.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    58. Re:This is sad ... by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Funny
      And you have a right to a free lawyer

      Can I fork the lawyer and rename it?

    59. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, losen up a bit you looser.

    60. Re:This is sad ... by thetroll123 · · Score: 1

      Apparently there was nothing in those books about disposing of evidence.

      There was originally - in accordance with the instructions, he cut out and burned those pages...

    61. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The worst possible outcome is that you will be found guilty and gang raped repeatedly in prison. In america any jail sentence carries with it an adjunct punishment of rape."

      Is that really true?
      I kinda think it is an urban legend. Not that it never happens ... but does it happen to everyone?

      Do you have some numbers to back that up?

    62. Re:This is sad ... by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's always possible to imagine something worse. That doesn't mean it's good.

    63. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, that's it. I've just drowned about a dozen puppies for absolutely no reason. That's the saddest, period, so there's some closure for you on this damn thread.

    64. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, OJ was guilty. OJ was so obviously guilty that it wasn't funny. He may have been found not guilty but he surely wasn't innocent.

    65. Re:This is sad ... by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Or why not steal someone ELSEs car (buy a obviously stolen one etc) and set IT on fire.. doh.

    66. Re:This is sad ... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Funny
      Apparently there was nothing in those books about disposing of evidence.

      File a bug. The pressure should have triggered him to flush his cache.

    67. Re:This is sad ... by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Someone could have broken his car windows, and put some blood on the seat.

      By the way, you have to be really stupid to buy murdering books, and keep them when you're done.

      So either he is really stupid, or someone did that for him, or he made it too obvious to look real.

    68. Re:This is sad ... by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IANAL, but as far as I know, it does not work both ways. A judge can set aside a guilty verdict that does not conform to law, but he cannot convict a defendant if an acquittal was not according to law.

    69. Re:This is sad ... by dementedWabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I find increasingly grevious is that the police department (and by extension the court system) can - and will - arrest anyone with a hairs breadth of suspicion when under pressure (and often when not). Not only have there been countless cases in the past where the obviously guilty have gotten off scot-free (do I even dare mention OJ?), but there are many cases as well where the innocent have been put behind bars just because the local cops were under pressure to "get someone into the process". Sad point is, in the eyes of the law you're supposed to be "innocent until proven guilty". Bollocks. If that were the case, you would not be behind bars (or on bail) while the trial is taking place. If you're innocent and have any assets you are forced to use your own lawyer - otherwise be faced with the prospect of using the cr*p lawyers in the "state provided" attorney listing (for the most part they are, otherwise they would be in the private sector). IMHO, the state should pay all legal costs if you are found innocent. We're not talking just loss of freedom folks: we're talking loss of home, future employment prospects, respect of the community, often loss of life; with no compensation to make up for it when innocence is proven. And even if you are found innocent, the Media has already branded you as "involved". But hey, "Justice" must be served. Unless you're wealthy. Justice don't apply to you then, unless you've got blood splattered all over your gloves and car (oh wait, not even then)..

    70. Re:This is sad ... by Kynde · · Score: 1

      >> And you have a right to a free lawyer
      >
      > Can I fork the lawyer and rename it?


      Sure. Forking is actually recommended and after that it really doesn't matter what you call it.
      Personal favourite especially for lawyers is a good pitch fork (images.google.com/images?q=heavy+duty+pitch+fork) .

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    71. Re:This is sad ... by operato · · Score: 1

      prospect of using the cr*p lawyers in the "state provided" attorney listing (for the most part they are, otherwise they would be in the private sector).
      some people don't go into the private sector because they believe in offering their services for the good of the people as opposed to some money grabbing people out there.
    72. Re:This is sad ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      By the way, you have to be really stupid to buy murdering books, and keep them when you're done.

      I think I have heard his explanation for the book purchases - they aren't "howto" manuals, they are descriptions of the legal and investigative process. He was being investigated for murder so he wanted to get a better idea of what was being done to him.

      That certainly fits with the purchase of the books over a week after she went missing.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    73. Re:This is sad ... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      why would the police "note" he has a passanger seat a full 7 days before it is missing. I would note one missing, but any normally stained one would go unnoticed. He was under suspicion already at that point, what cop writes that on a citation... half the time they can't spell my wife's name or license number right.. and they're just copying from the card!!!

      Obviously the police were looking for something from the 3rd on... but there's a really big gap in timeline and they supposedly were bugging him often. Either he's incredibily stupid for a computer geek, or something is fishy. But he IS weird.. cops are jocks and don't like weird...

    74. Re:This is sad ... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      Blood found in his mother's house and a sleeping bag found in his car match his former wife's

      For the sleeping bag, ever heard that french song by singer Camille : "les ex c'est sexy" (ex-es are sexy) ? There might be tons of reasons for soon-to-be divorced couples to have consensual sex, even in the middle of an otherwise bad fight (yes, been there done that - a good lover remains a good lover even if the person's an asshole). Obviously, you don't want the children to witness, so you take a sleeping bag, put a Disney on TV, and go anywhere slightly remote. And for the bleeding, well, shit happens every day. You cut yourself on things, ...

      For the dismantled seat, tool set, bags, tape, crime novels and all the other stuff, I bet more than half the slashdot crowd is in deep trouble if there's a crime nearby, because most of us have already all of those items in our trunks, and most of us have been driving in less than pristine cars.

      Circumstantial evidences are no evidence at all, except evidence of poor police job.

    75. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?

      A good start?

    76. Re:This is sad ... by 13bPower · · Score: 2, Funny

      in soviet russia, lawyer forks you! Well, I think they fork you anywhere, really.

    77. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name of the book is 'IF I did it'. IF! Get it?!

      Love and Kisses,

      O.J.

    78. Re:This is sad ... by bythescruff · · Score: 5, Funny

      "But it's sadder to see a innocent person goto prison."

      Wait for it...

      Wait for it...

      Yes, gotos are evil.

      --
      Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
    79. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well in that case you might just as well just hose down the courthouse in AK47 fire

    80. Re:This is sad ... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1
      In the South, that joke is told. The difference is that "lawyer" is replace with "'black person" or some other word that refers to a black person. No, I'm not kidding. I've heard it with my own ears.
      A lot of old racist jokes get recycled into more PC ribalds once $ETHIC_MEMBER is replace by $PROFESSIONAL_OCCUPATION. It's true that the joke had darker origins, but hey, that's never stopped most from having their morning coffee.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    81. Re:This is sad ... by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      The outcome of the trial may have been just considering the circumstances, but what isn't just is that he couldn't be tried again for the same crime. I'm not sure, but I think that's a speciality of US law that I haven't heard of anywhere else. Here, if a trial is found to be violating the rules, a higher court will order the trial to be repeated.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    82. Re:This is sad ... by mrogers · · Score: 1
    83. Re:This is sad ... by dementedWabbit · · Score: 1

      ...which is why I said "for the most part". I'll agree there are a few folks that are upstanding gems; but as they are very few, the reasonable assumption is that you will not get one of the better options. Otherwise, would people with money bother with private lawyers?

    84. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also found inside the car, according to police, was a roll of trash bags, masking tape, a siphon pump, absorbent towels and two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.
      ...one swedish made penis enlarger pump; one receipt for swedish made penis enlarger pump; one book, "swedish made penis enlarger pumps and me"...
    85. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lastly, a box containing the first two drafts of "How I did it," by Hans Reiser.


      Don't you mean "If I Did It"?
    86. Re:This is sad ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Informative

      Exactly, any competent Juror will ingore the Judges instructions. Typically they are illegal, or pusing the judges agenda. As a juror you are there to decide right and wrong not the bullshit the Judge tries to shove down your throat.

      Fun part, if you say that at any time, they make sure you dont get on the jury. They dont want juries tainted with free thinkers that know their and others rights. (Hence why some places only allow people for the death penalty on murder trials.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    87. Re:This is sad ... by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      The trick, of course, is PROVING that the government KNEW that you were innocent.

      The government knows that they're unable to produce a body, and without that, they know they can't even prove that she's dead, much less at the hands of Mr. Reiser. Knowing they can't prove murder and that they know you're innocent until proven guilty, I think this should be rather easy to establish in court.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    88. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who puts the evil lawyers in business?

    89. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, a crime has been committed... _Somebody_ has to go to prison to keep the sheeple in line.

    90. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is USA run by evil lawyers?

      If you think the same isn't happening in your country, you're naive beyond hope... but they like it that way.

    91. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same is generally true here, and while some of the evidence was shown to be 'botched', there was no mistrial.

      And, he was essentially tried twice, with the second trial being a civil case, where he lost.

    92. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The saddest of all is that an innocent person was murdered. So we have:
      Murdered>Falsely imprisoned>Murderer unpunished>Innocent person falsely accused>Running out of milk for my cereal.

    93. Re:This is sad ... by volpe · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you also have the power to kill people, to steal, to vandalize, and do anything else you wish to do. Of course, just because you have the power to do something, doesn't mean you have the legal right to do it.

    94. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To let a guity man slip is clearly incompetant, but does not violate the rights of any one human being.

      Locking up an innocent man, however, clearly violates the rights of a human being, and therefore is not merely incompetant but outright oppressive.

      There is no comparison between the two, and I can't believe people would actually try to make that comparison. It is a greater tragedy to lock up one innocent man than to let 1000 guilty men slip. When your government locks up innocent men, you are dealing with a much greater force of evil than all the "private" criminals in the world put together. Why? The criminal, although willing to employ coercion against others, is equal to you and me in terms of power: no criminal posesses the special "right" to employ coercion; that is why they are criminals. Government, on the other hand, is founded on that "right" to employ coercion as its means -- clearly, government is the most dangerous force that could possibly exist. (What force could possibly be more dangerous than a special "right" to employ coercion?)

    95. Re:This is sad ... by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...The judge's instructions were very clear.)
      ...
      Google for "jury nullification" if you want more info.


      That's one of those things that's always seemed so obvious to me (even before I learned the term for it), that I don't really know why more people never realized it. The judge deals with the law for a living. On the other hand, as a normal citizen, I'm only familiar with a few laws, and then the rest just comes from my "common sense".

      So, why would it make any sense to bring in a panel full of people who are (likely) LESS educated on matters of law than the judge, and then let THEM be the ones to follow the law to the letter? That makes no sense. In most cases, the judge is the person in the courtroom who is best suited to be the issuing judgements bases solely on the letter of the law.

      So what point does bringing in a jury serve? Well, it could serve either of 3 purposes:
      1) A dog and pony show (which is what the whole 'follow the judges instructions' thing seems like to me)
      2) A chance to get a verdict based on the jury's misunderstanding of law
      3) A chance to get a verdict based on what (a small sampling of) society feels is right.

      Now seriously...which of those 3 seems most likely to be the founding fathers' intent?
    96. Re:This is sad ... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      This might be news to many slashdot readers, but there is another quite obvious reason one might find a female's blood in a sleeping bag.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstrual_cycle

      The thing I don't get in this case is why they're moving forward so quickly as a murder case when all of the evidence appears to be circumstantial.

    97. Re:This is sad ... by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1

      I thinks its traditional for the lawyers to fork their clients

      --
      Maybe you live in interesting times
    98. Re:This is sad ... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      And, he was essentially tried twice, with the second trial being a civil case, where he lost.

      This in itself is a proof of how wrong the US legal system is. In most countries, at least, there cn't be a contradiction beteen the outcome of the criminal prosecution and the civil case. Criminal justice being generaly favoured over private interests, if the criminal verdict is "not guilty", then the civil case is terminated. How can you be held liable for something the society said you didn't do ? You have to look hard at some primitive tribes to find similar discrepensies, but at least they have the excuse to believe in magical forces and surnatural power, and the necessity for a scapegoat to restore balance in the universe, either with his life or his money (see for instance Maus and evy-Struss works).

      Of course, one could argue that many US citizens have a very primitive cosmology, too, this maybe explaining that.

    99. Re:This is sad ... by kmcardle · · Score: 1

      You create the law if you're on a jury.
      Aren't you supposed to interpret the law when you're on a jury? During the trial, facts are established, the laws relevant to the case are explained, and the jury debates the facts vs. the laws to decide guilty or not guilty.

      Creating laws falls under the Legislative branch of the government, and the trial system is part of the Judicial branch.

      --
      then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
    100. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call that evidence? That's nothing. OJ had a bloody glove, and he was still innocent....right?

    101. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he already lost his wife. They were separated.

    102. Re:This is sad ... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh...I think that was "If I did it". Because, of course...he didn't actually do it. (or at least that's the story he's sticking with).

    103. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm, O.J. Simpson comes to mind.

    104. Re:This is sad ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Not if that guilty person goes on to kill five people it ain't.

    105. Re:This is sad ... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't see the difference because they're basically the same thing.

      Have you considered the possibility that maybe the final struggle between good and evil has already occurred and contrary to what christians are taught, evil wins? As a wise man once said, "Evil will always triumph over good because good is stupid."

      That sure would explain why we have the illusion of choice in the system, but the outcome is always a system that puts money and power over justice every time. What better way to control people than by making them think they're supposed to be good and the system is supposed to work out in the end, even when all the evidence points to the contrary?

      Of course, the up side of the approach we have now is that most people don't think "I'm so smart and the system is so corrupt that I can get away with killing my ex-wife if I play my cards right."

    106. Re:This is sad ... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      "The worst possible outcome is that you will be found guilty and gang raped repeatedly in prison. In america any jail sentence carries with it an adjunct punishment of rape."

      Is that really true?
      I kinda think it is an urban legend. Not that it never happens ... but does it happen to everyone?


      I don't know, but there is this: http://www.spr.org/
    107. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, and if he hadn't killed her he wouldn't be in this situation...

    108. Re:This is sad ... by Coucho · · Score: 1

      if(person == free)
      goto prison;
      else if(person == guilty)
      commitCrimes();
      prison:
      rape();

      --
      *pSig = NULL;
    109. Re:This is sad ... by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      Please don't forget that a judge's instructions are worthless and that you as a member of the jury have all the power and the final say. You have the power to decide whether a law is just or unjust and are free to ignore it and do as you wish. Anything that comes out of the judge's mouth means diddly-squat. What the law says means diddly-squat. You create the law if you're on a jury.

      Google for "jury nullification" if you want more info.


      You are right, but you might be surprised how many Americans don't know this, including perhaps the person you are replying to. I've heard several times of jurors saying "We wanted to acquit the guy, but we had to vote guilty" without realizing that on a jury you don't have to vote any way you don't want to.

      My best friend is a lawyer and I asked him about judges throwing out jury verdicts, as a follow up post below talks about. He told me that while judges do have the power to do this, they almost never do so because if they do this, the case will almost certainly be appealed and appelate courts take a dim view in most cases of judges who ignore jury verdicts.

    110. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Aren't you supposed to interpret the law when you're on a jury? During the trial, facts are established, the laws relevant to the case are explained, and the jury debates the facts vs. the laws to decide guilty or not guilty.

      Jury nullification as referenced by the grandparent post refers to a juror's ability to decide a law is unjust and thus a different verdict should be rendered. Consider a law that says any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death. Now consider Joe accidentally kill Bill. Under such a law, Joe is clearly guilty. However, a jury could look at the law and decide Joe doesn't deserve to be convicted and refuse to render a guilty verdict. That is exactly the situation that transformed juries from a body that renders a "proven" or "not proven" verdict to one that issues a "guilty" or "not guilty" verdict.

      In the words of John Adams, "It is not only his right but also his duty to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court."

      Suppose a state congress changes its murder laws so that it is okay for a white person to kill a black person. Should the jury blindly enforce such a law?

    111. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see libertarians and jury nullification people silenced here on slashdot. Lumpy speaks the truth. How do you think the stupid booze ban in the 20's got removed? Jury nullification. the juries refused to convict the booze runners and bar owners.

    112. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not saying he couln't have done it, but it's like the OJ case.. soon we'll be finding the police lab "embelished" some reports...mislabled where evidence came from...etc."

      And just like OJ, he'll be guilty regardless.

    113. Re:This is sad ... by bgat · · Score: 1

      > The trick, of course, is PROVING that the government KNEW that you were innocent.

      Indeed, that's the trick. But for the government to bring a criminal case in the first place, they have to first bring their evidence to a Grand Jury, which is like a jury trial before charges are ever filed. If the Grand Jury doesn't think there's enough evidence to reasonably support an indictment, everything stops right there.

      It's difficult for the government to get a case going in the first place. If they're willing to work that hard to cover up your actual innocence, they'd also have to work hard to conceal the efforts they went through in order to do so. So yes, they would make the deception difficult to prove--- but the chances of ending up in that situation in the first place are pretty low because the Grand Jury is very likely to see what's going on.

      b.g.

      --
      b.g.
    114. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrested for no reason? My aren't we trolling today. Most folks who get off did the crime, they're not "Arrested for no reason." It's good that the system is designed to and does err on the side of caution, but "Arrested for no reason"?

    115. Re:This is sad ... by Atzanteol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now seriously...which of those 3 seems most likely to be the founding fathers' intent?

      None of the above. Seriously. "The jury of your peers" is about keeping a ruling class from passing judgment on the masses. It's one of the last lines of defense against corruption in the legal system.

      Also, the judge explains to the jury the law involved, and the jury is allowed to ask questions about it. The jury is there to decide the truth, not the law.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    116. Re:This is sad ... by jnik · · Score: 3, Informative
      The saddest of all is that an innocent person was murdered.

      No, a person is missing. That she was murdered is an inference.

    117. Re:This is sad ... by Obyron · · Score: 2, Informative

      JNOV: Judgment Non Obstante Veredicto. Judges are not allowed to use JNOV to direct a verdict of guilty when the jury returns an acquittal. Once you've requested a jury trial, only a jury can convict you.

      Wiki it for more info.

      --
      --Obyron
    118. Re:This is sad ... by fotbr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Am I the only one that finds the focus on the books he happened to own more than a little disturbing?

      Even if he had a book titled "How to murder your wife and get away with it" it doesn't mean anything. It doesn't mean he was planning anything, or even thinking about doing anything -- I agree, notes in margins, highlighting/underlining pieces, etc might mean something, but that is different than just having the books.

      This type of thinking is EXACTLY why library staff get pissed about the patriot act allowing law enforcement access to their records of who borrowed what, and when.

    119. Re:This is sad ... by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      You can of course then sue for malicious prosecution.

      What money will you use to pay for a lawyer to help you with the lawsuit?

    120. Re:This is sad ... by archen · · Score: 1

      That would make more sense. How can you tell someone is a lawyer just by seeing them at the side of the road?

    121. Re:This is sad ... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      After all, if YOU LOOSE, you have to pay the government court costs.

      It's LOSE, dammit! L-O-S-E.

      And no, in the United States, criminal trials do not use a loser-pays system.

    122. Re:This is sad ... by kmcardle · · Score: 1

      First, you're trolling by bringing race into the issue and I'm not going to bother to respond to that.

      Second, there is a legal (ie, in the law) distinction between murder and accidental death. In cases of murder, the death penalty may be required. In cases of involuntary manslaughter (accidents), the death penalty is not an option. If the legal system is working properly, the your example case would be a charge against involuntary manslaughter, not murder. In cases where the person is deemed guilty against the wrong law, the appeals process is designed to provide relief. Standard clause -- the system is not perfect, etc, etc..

      Consider a law that says any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death. Now consider Joe accidentally kill Bill. Under such a law, Joe is clearly guilty. However, a jury could look at the law and decide Joe doesn't deserve to be convicted and refuse to render a guilty verdict.
      Exactly. The jury process is working. The fact that Joe accidentally killed Bill would be brought out in court and the jury would weight that. Your argument is flawed, you're confusing the punishment and the crime -- "any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death". If Joe is not found guilty of killing Bill, he won't suffer the punishment.

      --
      then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
    123. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less evil (many say they were actually good) lawyers, during the Revolution. Before that, kings, and before that it's pretty much turtles all the way down.

    124. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forget the legal term for it, but I believe a judge can set aside a jury verdict also. It's also leaving the judge open to review, and is likely to be grounds for a mistrial, retrial or appeal (whatever the appropriate legal term is). So it works both ways.

      This is correct. Here is a link of an example, though it still doesn't name what legislation/procedure gives them this authority.

    125. Re:This is sad ... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Google for "jury nullification" if you want more info.

      Never trust Google for legal advice.

      While the concept of jury nullification is indeed a concept the US court system has inherited from English common law, a statement like "you create the law if you're on a jury" is utterly absurd. The US Constitution, which supercedes common law provisions, is quite clear on the issue of who creates the law: the legislature.

    126. Re:This is sad ... by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      Grand Jury, which is like a jury trial before charges are ever filed. If the Grand Jury doesn't think there's enough evidence to reasonably support an indictment, everything stops right there.

      It's difficult for the government to get a case going in the first place.


      I would wager it's easier than you're letting on. I did the grand jury thing once, 10 years ago. A lot of the stuff that came through was as choreographed as a musical. The DA would bring in grumpy looking convicts when they wanted to push a case for a drug dealer to tweak the jury's sympathies, and they'd bring in a tearful old grandmother when they had a child abuse case. When they couldn't find the perfect actor, they'd "prep" us by explaining how the next witness is an excellent liar, and if she starts crying, it's just a method of control.. etc, etc.

      I don't think we voted down a single case in a month of work. I really tried to avoid being a sucker, and I think I pissed off a lot of my fellow jurors because I asked way too many damn questions, but at least I never left that room feeling like I'd been gamed by the system.

      I suppose, it's just as likely the DA's office did their research before going to grand jury, and only presented us with winnable cases, making it easy for us to vote in the affirmative. My single experience isn't exactly a viable sample size. What I can say for sure is that the system is finely tuned, and from my limited point of view, it's actually pretty easy for the government to get what they want.

    127. Re:This is sad ... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "I'm not saying he couln't have done it, but it's like the OJ case.. "

      So Hans will be found innocent in a circus trial with incompetent prosecution, a media whore judge, the best defense money could buy, and then write a detailed account about how he COULD HAVE (but didn't) do the crime of which he was committed?

      If I were Hans, I'd aim a little higher - I think the Unabomber has higher respect in the public than OJ.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    128. Re:This is sad ... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      "The jury of your peers" is about keeping a ruling class from passing judgment on the masses.

      And how does a jury prevent that if they are supposed to follow the instructions of the judge. The ruling class makes the law, and the judge instructs the jury that they have to follow those laws to the letter. "No, we aren't MAKING you jump through the hoops. We're only making the hoops and then telling you that you HAVE to jump through them." I believe the founding fathers intent for the jurors to recognize the hoops and refuse to jump through them.

    129. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is potential to win money, a lawyer will do the work up front for free and take a percentage of the winnings.

    130. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Exactly. The jury process is working. The fact that Joe accidentally killed Bill would be brought out in court and the jury would weight that. Your argument is flawed, you're confusing the punishment and the crime -- "any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death". If Joe is not found guilty of killing Bill, he won't suffer the punishment.


      You've missed the whole point of the parent's post. Regardless of whether the accused is guilty of the crime or not, the jury has the *right* to decide to acquit the accused on the basis that the law is unjust. It's called jury nullification... look it up.
    131. Re:This is sad ... by neoform · · Score: 1

      "I'd rather let a thousand guilty men go free than chase after them."
      -Chief Wiggum

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    132. Re:This is sad ... by yada21 · · Score: 1
      It's sad that someone may be able to buy his way out of a murder conviction
      Not at all, it's just the normal functioning of a free market. The victim (in a murder case it would be his relatives) have as much right to try to influence the trial towards an opposite decision. If you're richer than them, you win. Survival of the fittest. It's what makes the free market more efficient than socialist meddling that prevents you culling the unproductive.
      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
    133. Re:This is sad ... by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      What force could possibly be more dangerous

      The Force. Specifically, the Dark Side.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    134. Re:This is sad ... by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Judgment notwithstanding the verdict: when the jury makes a decision that no reasonable men could agree was correct. Very high standard, actually.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    135. Re:This is sad ... by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      You are misinterpreting what he said. He stated:
      Consider a law that says any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death. Now consider Joe accidentally kill Bill. Under such a law, Joe is clearly guilty. However, a jury could look at the law and decide Joe doesn't deserve to be convicted and refuse to render a guilty verdict.

      Implicit in this is the proof that Joe killed Bill. This is a fact and not in dispute. As a matter of practicality, lets say the accident in which Bill was killed by Joe occurred in broad daylight with thousands of onlookers and hundreds of cameras. The law, as described, would require Joe be sentenced to death--regardless of the accidental nature of the situation.

      The jury, under the law, would have to render a guilty verdict (Joe killed Bill), but if you allow for jury nullification (and this is what I think we all agree on), the jury can refuse to render a guilty verdict, even though the law says Joe should be sentenced to death. The jury then is not saying that Joe is not guilty, but is saying that the law is unjust. What they actually tell the judge may be that they do not believe, despite all evidence, that Joe is guilty, but the message is that the law is unjust. This is a big difference.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    136. Re:This is sad ... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Other than the murder books, I have all that in my car right now. I have a few books on serial killers at home because abnormal psychology is interesting. I've even replaced the seats in one of my cars - the same car whose carpet was recently saturated with water because the windshield leaks (and has been before due to an air condtioner problem / spilled drink / etc). I've written GPL'd software that some commercial entities use. So, I guess that I should just go turn myself in to the police right now, as I've *obviously* killed several people in my car. There's no other logical explanation.

      Well, except that I sometimes transfer automotive fluids, wipe up the mess with rags, and dispose of my trash in bags instead of throwing it out the window while I drive. Oh, and I label things with masking tape. But I guess I could be a serial murderer too.

    137. Re:This is sad ... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      How can you be held liable for something the society said you didn't do ?

      There are a couple of very simple answers, though you seem more interested in hating on Americans than rational thinking. Your flawed premise is that a nonconviction is a judgment of innoncence, or the "society" saying that "you didn't do" something. It is nothing of the sort. It is merely a judgement that the evidence as presented was insufficient to obtain a conviction. But this could be caused by any number of reasons, only one of which is innocence. For example:

      1. Incompetence by the prosecutor.
      2. Recalcitrant jurors.
      3. A different burden of proof. Remember that criminal convictions require proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" (i.e., near certainty.) Civil liability requires only proof "by a preponderance of the evidence" (i.e., more likely than not.)

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    138. Re:This is sad ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Yes, gotos are evil.

      Ah, so that's why they're always serving spaghetti in prison.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    139. Re:This is sad ... by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      No actually you cant sue for that in 99% of the cases. The prosecutor has to blatantly ignore facts that would obviously clear you as the culprit. you might be able to sue the cops if they fabricated evidence, but the prosecutor is gonna get a pass on that. It is extremely unlikely that the prosecution was based on malice and more likely incompetency.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    140. Re:This is sad ... by kmcardle · · Score: 1

      Consider a law that says any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death. Now consider Joe accidentally kill Bill. Under such a law, Joe is clearly guilty.
      No, that doesn't convict Joe. What that says that if Joe kills Bill, he shall be sentenced to death. It does not state under what circumstances Joe's guilt is established. If Joe did kill Bill and it is an accident, he will not be guilty of the crime and will not face the punishment. Joe has to be charged with the crime of muder, proven guilty, and then will face "a law that says any person who kills another person shall be sentenced to death".

      My original point is that a parent several generations removed stated that the jury makes the law, and that is not the case. You do bring up a good point that the jury may find a law unjust and not convict because of that, but in no way do juries make laws.

      --
      then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
    141. Re:This is sad ... by Too+Many+Secrets · · Score: 0

      Remember the scene in Office Space when they look in a dictionary for the definition of "money laundering"?

      You'd have the same kind of reaction to someone trying to steal a car or buy an "obviously stolen one" for the first time.

    142. Re:This is sad ... by _iris · · Score: 1

      Listing facts without linking them coherently with motive and also tying it together with a possible timeline is akin to diagnosing yourself with a disease because Wikipedia lists nearly all of your symptoms even though dozens of other diseases, which you haven't read about on Wikipedia, also exhibit all of the same symptoms.

    143. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What do you call 100 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?

      Well, at least there is an improved version of that (which I heard in France, though it was not about lawyers)
      "What are 100 ... in the river? Environmental pollution. What are all ... in the river? The solution."
      And actually if they weren't directed at someone in such a hateful way I wouldn't find that joke so bad...

    144. Re:This is sad ... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And how does a jury prevent that if they are supposed to follow the instructions of the judge. The ruling class makes the law, and the judge instructs the jury that they have to follow those laws to the letter. "No, we aren't MAKING you jump through the hoops. We're only making the hoops and then telling you that you HAVE to jump through them." I believe the founding fathers intent for the jurors to recognize the hoops and refuse to jump through them.

      You're misinterpreting how it works.

      There are questions of law, and questions of fact. The judge's job is to decide questions of law, for example whether certain evidence can legally be admitted, whether the state or defense is allowed to present certain legal arguments, etc.

      The jury's job is to decide questions of fact, like "did W shoot X?", or "should X's story be believed, or should Z's?"

      When the judge gives an instruction to the jury, it's simply to tell what the law requires. For example, in Florida the standard jury instruction to define robbery is:

      To prove the crime of Robbery, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt: 1. (Defendant) took the (money or property described in charge) from the person or custody of (person alleged). 2. Force, violence, assault, or putting in fear was used in the course of the taking. 3. The property taken was of some value. 4. The taking was with the intent to permanently or temporarily [deprive (victim) of [his] [her] right to the property or any benefit from it] [appropriate the property of (victim) to [his] [her] own use or to the use of any person not entitled to it].

      Now it's up to the jury to decide whether the State met its burden of proof for each element of the crime. The judge isn't telling the jury to convict or not convict, but just what the law requires to be shown.

    145. Re:This is sad ... by Splab · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that. I find it sad that a person is not believed to be innocent untill proven guilty. About the missing frontseat - how do one tell that a set of tools was used to remove 4 bolts? And perhaps the seat is missing because he forgot to close the door of the car and it got spoiled in a rainstorm - would explain why the carpet had been soaked.

      I mean he might have done it, but how about giving him the benefit of doubt?

    146. Re:This is sad ... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suppose a state congress changes its murder laws so that it is okay for a white person to kill a black person. Should the jury blindly enforce such a law?

      In fact, the main problem with jury nullification is that for a good chunk of our nation's history, the opposite of the above situation was true, especially in the deep south. The law said it's not ok for anyone to kill anyone else; white juries wouldn't convict white killers of black people, however.

    147. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOULD HAVE, you idiot. Not "would of". Why not just think a little when you write? "Would of" makes no sense at all.

    148. Re:This is sad ... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of very simple answers,

      "simplistic" is more adequate here.

      though you seem more interested in hating on Americans than rational thinking.

      Certainly not ; it's not because I don't sing every chance I get the stars and stripes that I hate America. There are a lot of things I actually like about your country, but your legal system happens to not be part of those things, simply because it's retarded, fucked up, cruel, and illogical. Oh, and it's now the only one among democratic countries that violates the UN Humans Rights charter by structure rather than by exception. Overall, a very pityfull mess. I personaly would use your so hyped 1st amendment right to protest every weekend if my country happened to have a judicial system in the same league as China and Libya.

      Your flawed premise is that a nonconviction is a judgment of innoncence

      I beg to differ ; I know the difference. But whatever your efforts, you're only showing that the US system puts emphasis on the personnal revenge (of the victim) rather than social peace. That's the hallmark of a pre-christian germanic, tribe based, family enforced, system, in which the common law is still rooted. Sing it the way you like, that's completely backward in the modern age.

      And if we now look at your examples, then for case (1) why doesn't the State be liable for its failure ? For case (2), why would a jury be reluctant to convict a proven criminal, if not for lack of proof ? (recursively see point 1 to find the liability). Case (3) proves just that the system is flawed, giving 2 conflicting answers to a single question, thank you for the help.

    149. Re:This is sad ... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The government has a pretty easy time with the Grand Jury becaus it's not an adversarial process; they present their side of the case and that's it. Grand Juries just sort of a gatekeeper function (like judges do when they decide whether to issue arrest warrants) before it gets to the real trial, in order to make sure the really baseless cases are thrown out.

    150. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WOULD HAVE, you idiot. Not "would of".

      Well, have course your right, but that doesn't make him an idiot.

    151. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess that I should just go turn myself in to the police right now

      That's the smart thing. After all, if Reiser had turned himself into the police, then he'd be the police and he could drop the charges.

    152. Re:This is sad ... by booch · · Score: 1
      Seriously. "The jury of your peers" is about keeping a ruling class from passing judgment on the masses. It's one of the last lines of defense against corruption in the legal system.

      Yes. And that corrupt ruling class is the legislature. So it would seem that jury nullification is in fact completely within the framework of the Constitution.

      Although as you point out, the jury is supposed to be ruling on the facts, not the law. The jury is basically there to decide who is telling the truth regarding any disputed facts. I'm not sure that that's the case in practice though. If it were, I would suspect that judges would throw out more cases where the disputes are over the laws. Instead, it's usually only on appeals where those issues get dealt with.
      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    153. Re:This is sad ... by jadavis · · Score: 1

      No actually you cant sue for that in 99% of the cases. The prosecutor has to blatantly ignore facts that would obviously clear you as the culprit.

      So, does the Duke rape case fall in the 1%?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    154. Re:This is sad ... by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      it's not because I don't sing every chance I get the stars and stripes that I hate America.

      No, it's more the likening us to primitives and baseless criticism that demostrates this.

      I beg to differ ; I know the difference.

      You don't demonstrate that by equating "not guilty" to "society says you didn't do."

      it's retarded, fucked up, cruel, and illogical.

      Blah, blah, blah. How so? It's still the only justice system in the world with an absolute right to a trial by jury.

      you're only showing that the US system puts emphasis on the personnal revenge (of the victim) rather than social peace.

      How so? How is my demonstrating that a judgment of "not guilty" in a criminal case does not logically imply non-liability in a civil case putting emphasis on "personal revenge?" Are you opposed to logic in justice?

      And if we now look at your examples, then for case (1) why doesn't the State be liable for its failure ?

      The state is liable for its failure. It cannot try the case again. You are proposing that other third parties also be liable for the state's failure. That is not fair; it would be a miscarriage of justice. Suppose that a manufacturer intentionally produces a defective product that hurts somebody, but that in a criminal trial, the state is unable to prove any crime occurred. Are you saying the injured customer should be barred from seeking civil damages from the manufacturer? I find that retarded, fucked up, cruel, and illogical.

      (2), why would a jury be reluctant to convict a proven criminal, if not for lack of proof ?

      There are many reasons. Perhaps the jury was precluded from seeing certain evidence. Perhaps they were dazzled and confused by the irrelevant rhetoric of the defense attorney. Perhaps they refuse to convict out of racial solidarity or bigotry. You seem to be assuming that every jury is omniscient and incapable of error. I find that laughable.

      proves just that the system is flawed, giving 2 conflicting answers to a single question, thank you for the help.

      Wrong again. "Is the defendant a criminal?" and "Is the defendant liable?" are two DIFFERENT questions.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    155. Re:This is sad ... by cadeon · · Score: 1
      Yes, but can you fork the lawyer and hack out the evil?

      You'd probably be better off starting a new project.

    156. Re:This is sad ... by jadavis · · Score: 1

      have political power

      No, that gets you out of being charged, because you are friends with the DA. Why would a jury be more likely to side with a politician if it actually went to trial?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    157. Re:This is sad ... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Faking her death... its not like she gets a life insurance check for that.

      It is exactly like her *kids* do.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    158. Re:This is sad ... by scribblej · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about law -- so this is an honest question. What about "Jury Nullification?"

    159. Re:This is sad ... by cadeon · · Score: 1

      This is starting to sound like Trial By Slashdot.

    160. Re:This is sad ... by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1
      Well, have course your right, but that doesn't make him an idiot.


      YOU'RE, you idiot. Not "your".
      --

      Enigma

    161. Re:This is sad ... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      And of course you can have the right to a free, but incompetent lawyer who mumbles during the trial "yeah, he did it, and I know it!"

      Or you can even try to defend youself if you are smart enough to read legal texts and try to build your own case.

      Based on perception alone, I don't know which of these is necessarily better.

      Frankly, you get what you pay for in a legal defense. And as OJ Simpson proved, paying for the best can in some cases get you off free even if you are guilty.

    162. Re:This is sad ... by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      "the addition of the books is way too much."

      Exactly. It screams of a setup. Now where was the last time I heard an all to convienient car full of crime books scenario;
      "The Mitsubishi sedan sources said was rented by Atta, contained materials written in Arabic, including flight manuals, that law enforcement sources called "helpful" to the investigation."

      Just who were the private clients that he licesned software to? The US government perhaps?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    163. Re:This is sad ... by DarkShadeChaos · · Score: 1

      But what if it's reverse psychology, like "Nobody would possibly murder someone with so much telling evidence, especially given that's he a 'smart' person".

      Blows your mind, doesn't it :-D

      --
      The machine unmakes the man. Now that the machine is so perfect, the engineer is nobody. -Ralph Waldo Emerson
    164. Re:This is sad ... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      .us public defenders tend to be overworked and can't devote much time to individual cases. There's also the perception that public defenders aren't as good as private lawyers, but I can't say if that's true or not.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    165. Re:This is sad ... by weston · · Score: 1

      There is however no reason why this should be such an expensive (as in have to sell all your assets and go live under a bridge) proposition.

      There are reasons. The main one has to do with demand, and with how the legal system and profession feeds its own demand. Complexity of the system is part of the problem, though it may not be possible to eliminate legal complexity any more than it's possible to eliminate complexity in software development. And the other half is the arms-race nature of representation which is almost inherent in an adversarial system where one must hire professionals.

    166. Re:This is sad ... by gosand · · Score: 1

              And you have a right to a free lawyer

      Can I fork the lawyer and rename it?


      No. Lawyers do all the forking.

      ...


      (Soviet Russia joke was too obvious)

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    167. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course this gem from SFgate [sfgate.com]:

      Hans Reiser's Honda was missing its front passenger seat when police seized it Sept. 19, Cavness testified in an Oakland courtroom. After technicians removed the carpeting from the front seat area, they noticed that the floorboard had been saturated with water, Cavness said.

      Inside the car, police found a 40-piece socket set, Cavness said. The tools appeared to have been used to remove four bolts that had been used to attach the passenger seat to the floor, she said.

      Also found inside the car, according to police, was a roll of trash bags, masking tape, a siphon pump, absorbent towels and two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.

      Not all that suspicious if you think of the following scenario:

      Something goes wrong with the window on the passenger, preventing Reiser from closing it. He leaves it, hoping to get it fixed at the next convenient opportunity.

      Later that day, or perhaps over night, a rainstorm drenches the passenger side of his car. Reiser buys a pump to get the standing water out of his vehicle and a socket set to remove the drenched seat so it can be cleaned. He also gets some trash bags and masking tape to cover the passenger side window until he can get it fixed. He used the towels to dry the car's interior.

      The only things truly suspicious are the crime books, and as someone else pointed out, they don't deal with disposing of a body. I understand there's some blood evidence, but setting that aside, this isn't that convincing.

    168. Re:This is sad ... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Plug for the Fully Informed Jury Association. That we actually NEED this does not reflect well on our education system.

      http://www.fija.org/

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    169. Re:This is sad ... by Duds · · Score: 1

      Well at that point you'd have nothing and be able to qualify for the free lawyer you didn't have before!

    170. Re:This is sad ... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      Judith Regan has already signed a book deal with him.

    171. Re:This is sad ... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "When all is said and done, you are left with nothing. Even if you win."

      Some winnings... so basically if you're chosen as a suspect, you lose no matter what, even if you're innocent.

    172. Re:This is sad ... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      In the US a criminal verdict of 'not guilty' means "The prosecution couldn't come up with enough evidence to prove your guilt beyond the shadow of a doubt.". The burden of proof is much higher because the consequences are much higher for a criminal than a civil case. I think that makes a lot of sense, and I like how the US legal system works in that regard.

    173. Re:This is sad ... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      There are many reasons. Perhaps the jury was precluded from seeing certain evidence. Perhaps they were dazzled and confused by the irrelevant rhetoric of the defense attorney. Perhaps they refuse to convict out of racial solidarity or bigotry. You seem to be assuming that every jury is omniscient and incapable of error. I find that laughable.

      The most important reason a jury might not convict is that they don't think the law is just (or perhaps that it's application in the particular circumstance isn't just). I wish more people were aware of this because we have a lot of messed up laws in the US.

    174. Re:This is sad ... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      No, the consequences of him being allowed to be tried again would be disastrous. The government could keep anybody on trial for the same crime practically forever until a conviction was obtained. No, unless something was structurally botched in the trial (i.e. there was a mistrial) a verdict of 'not guilty' should terminate the government's right to try someone for a crime. Either they get all their ducks in a row and have the evidence ready or they fail to convict.

    175. Re:This is sad ... by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, that guy is gonna get sued (and he deserves it)

      He should really face criminal charges.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    176. Re:This is sad ... by bigwang · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to say that the book (David Simon's Homicide) is a very popular book.

      It was the basis for the NBC TV show. It's by no means a "how to get away with murder" book.
      You might as well convict the guy for having C.S.I:Miami DVDs.

    177. Re:This is sad ... by Virtex · · Score: 1

      You want to fork a lawyer? That sounds painful. Can I watch?

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    178. Re:This is sad ... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      "Jury Nullification" is for when a judge deems that a jury did not rule according to the law (eg. ruling "innocent" because the jury feels the law itself is unjust). A jury is only supposed to determine facts of the case. The law is the Judge's domain. I think Wikipedia can do a better job explaining it than I can.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    179. Re:This is sad ... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Whups, I'm confused (too close to Christmas). I was thinking that the Judge's have the right to over-ride the Jury (not Jury Nullification, which is the exact opposite of what I was thinking). But I'm not sure on this... Bleh. No more posting on /. for me today. :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    180. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What tipped you off? That I wrote "have" in place of "of"? See, it was a theme. "your" was in keeping with that theme.

      You idiot.

    181. Re:This is sad ... by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      In effect, what you are saying is true. A jury can always bring in a verdict of 'Not Guilty', regardless of the facts of the case (which is what the court expects them to determine) and the pertinent law (which the court expects them to accept from the judge).

      However, if you as a juror go around talking about Jury Nullification and such you might very well get thrown off the case and even charged with misconduct. You can always vote to acquit the defendant, but you might not make it that far if you let it be known that you aren't accepting the limitations being pushed by the court.

      In earlier times, American juries were informed of their rights by the court. Now, they have to inform themselves beforehand and avoid letting the court know what they've learned.

      "We have a criminal jury system which is superior to any in the world; and its efficiency is only marred by the difficulty of finding twelve men every day who don't know anything and can't read." - Mark Twain

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    182. Re:This is sad ... by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Ho, that's a lot different if that's books explaining the legal and investigative process. There is nothing wrong with buying a book like this when you know you are investigated, anyone would want to do that.

    183. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Jury Nullification is technically illegal, but there is apparently no penalty for it.

      Yes, a jury's say is final. Yes, a jury has the POWER to decide if a law is fair and just, but a jury is not SUPPOSED to do that. A jury is supposed to determine if a law was broken, and apply penalties.

      I know all about "jury nullification," and think it is horrible. The legislative branch writes laws, not the judiciary. The only time the judiciary should nullify a law is when that law itself is what is on trial. For example, if I think that a law barring people born on Tuesdays from marrying people born on Thursdays is stupid, and I end up on a jury that is a trial against two people who got married in violation of this law, I am morally compelled to want to acquit them. But I am duty-bound to convict them. If they raise a lawsuit against the state for HAVING the law, and I'm on THAT jury, I will happily rule against the law, though.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    184. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not making a very good job if you're trying to defend him, all you do is adding to the list of his motives.

    185. Re:This is sad ... by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      If he turns out to be innocent, it will be just that much sadder -- he will have lost his wife and be ruined.

      Read up on the case..he's not going to be sad for "losing" his wife. The bitch cheated on him, let another man screw her in HIS house (which she then tried to take away). It is no excuse for murder, but this case is as filthy as it gets.

      If he is innocent, the justice system you talk about will probably work the way it should. He is a smart guy and won't go down easily, even without lawyers who know all the tricks. The state's prosecuters are no better than cheap defense lawyers.

    186. Re:This is sad ... by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      What money will you use to pay for a lawyer to help you with the lawsuit? If you have a good case, plantiff's lawyers will sue for a commision - (no reward, no $$$). Also, you don't have to be broke to go with a public defender.. they are available at your request, but they have dozens of cases more to deal with than a paid lawyer, much less support from interns and legal aids, and are therefore less often succesful.

      -GiH
      (No, I'm not a lawyer, I'm a law student)
    187. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. That doesn't really change the underlying ethical dilemma.

    188. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Only 100 lawyers is being lazy.
      A good start begins at 10,000 lawyers.

    189. Re:This is sad ... by Sinical · · Score: 1

      He's talking about O.J. Simpson, you knucklehead.

    190. Re:This is sad ... by 6ame633k · · Score: 1

      "We get caught laundering money, we're not going to white collar resort prison. No, no, no. We're going to Federal "Pound me in the A$$" prison!" Yep. That guy is going to the latter...

      --
      You had me at merlot
    191. Re:This is sad ... by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      True it's sad to see an guilty person walk free.

      oblig. Chief Wiggum quote: "I'd rather let a thousand guilty men go free than chase them."

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    192. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but there was no evidence of wrong doing found in his car.

      The original report said he bought many books on murder, criminal investigation, etc because the police were getting nowhere and looking at no other possibility but him.

      The seat is meaningless without context. My car is currently missing it's front passenger seat. There is probably water under the carpet on the front passenger seat (not much, but some), and there are boxes of garbage bags and masking tape in my car at the moment. All easily explainable. A bucket of oil was placed on my front seat by my uncle which leaked and soaked through the entirety of the cushion and dripped down onto the carpeting. The seat was taken to the dump and is missing while I find another one at a pick and pull. The carpet was cleaned repeatedly and the water/dampness to it is from the cleaning process. The trash bags have been in my car because I've moved recently, and I've been helping my father sell his house. In both cases the trash bags were in the car because it was easier to keep them with me than to leave boxes at both locations. Tape is in the car for the same reasons, masking for painting in both locations.

      As outsiders looking in we have no context for the "evidence" that the police are finding. So while it may look like he's extremely guilty on the face of things, we have no real proof of that yet. Let the trial sort it out, that's why we have a justice system in the first place.

    193. Re:This is sad ... by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      Nobody gets BANNED from law enforcement for deliberately screwing up the trial!!!

      Well, there's a certain ex Los Angeles cop who now lives only about 50 miles south of Canada, in Northern Idaho.

      That may not be quite the same as BANNED, but it's close :) .

    194. Re:This is sad ... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Typical slashdot ranting/mindless joke gets +5 insightful. The fact is it's a free market society, and money buys you better lawyers. Should there be a law against free-market lawyers?

    195. Re:This is sad ... by nacturation · · Score: 1
      But if you stick it into a batch file, you can have some fun:

      PRISON:
      echo "Hello Bubba!"
       
      goto PRISON:
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    196. Re:This is sad ... by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Until we have a system for better qualified juries, possibly there should be. Given a truly impartial jury (or at least not hand-tuned by opposing lawyers), of reasonably intelligent, educated people capable of weighing factual data, understanding probabilities, and cutting through rhetoric, then yes, let lawyers charge what they want. In our current system, with carefully picked juries of mostly people who couldn't get out of jury duty, then the more expensive lawyer, through better rhetoric or simply managable case-load, will often prevail. A public defender is cheap, but if he is juggling 50 cases and has no more than five minutes for yours, then you, at the wrong end of the free-market system, have had it. Check Northwestern's journalism school, of all things, which has been overturning convictions where the alleged perp couldn't get a good lawyer, and a skilled prosecutor got another notch in his belt for sending someone up the river for 30 years. If both sides legal talent is evenly matched, then spend whatever (The Feds vs. IBM, for instance), but where it isn't, then there should be some sort of equalization. If you take on Dow, and your case is deemed legitimate, either you can get legal assistance, or the other side is limited to a proportional quantity of legal representation. If they've been burying napalm under your house, (or around here, releasing tons of TCE into the ground water, then simply closing down the local facility rather than admitting responsibility), it shouldn't be 50 well-paid corporate experts versus a new law student, just because that's what you can afford and that's what they can afford. Basically, the modern equivalent of the old Norse vs Greek pantheon; the Greek deities were interested in wisdom and justice (Minerva), the Norse in law and knowledge (Odin).

      Or, we could admit that we're overlawyered already, and try to reduce their role in society.

      So, we can professionalise juries, agree that you have the right to a lawyer, but not necessarily one of your choice (lawyers will be drafted like juries are), or we redesign the system with fewer opportunities for lawyers. I don't know where the existing herds go, but if every year 1/3 of a law-school class were automatically failed and sent to dig ditches in Botswana (pick your own destination for unpleasant manual labor far from where well-fed lawyers hang out), followed by one chance at the bar or out, we might cool the ardor of future ambulance chasers. Or we could admit they had some good ideas in the 19th century, and hire Lawyer Bill to solve the problem. At 1:00 a.m., that one has some appeal.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    197. Re:This is sad ... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Sometimes smart people do stupid things. You can look at the case of Richard Illes, who was a heart surgeon. He was arrested and convicted of killing his wife, the motive being that they were in the middle of a messy divorce. When police searched his house, he had on his bedstand "They Wrote Their Own Sentences. The FBI Handwriting Analysis Book." (Handwritten anonymous letters were later received by the police trying to implicate a coworker as the perpetrator.) He also used a rare gun in the murder that he had inherited from a relative. And finally, when they eventually arrested him, he had a manuscript for a book about the murder on his computer. The book was written from the killer's point of view.

    198. Re:This is sad ... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I wish them luck but don't expect them to have much success. Rape is part and parcel of our prison system and the US population likes it that way.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    199. Re:This is sad ... by NoTheory · · Score: 1

      The murder was set up by the wife? :P

      Remember, her family and friends haven't seen Nina Rieser since September. Her children are in the custody of the State of California (doesn't that sound pleasant). Typically one doesn't have a long taxing battle over divorce proceedings and then abandon your children to the state (one that it appears your husband would be willing to fight, possibly kill over).

      Skepticism is a good thing, but i find that conspiracy theories in this particular case are pretty far fetched.

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    200. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All jokes take delight in suffering.

    201. Re:This is sad ... by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      Call me nonsense, but then I wonder if his wife just hid somewhere else after a fight with Hans, and then ignore / not knowing that Hans was caught murdering with him.

      Ya, I know that is a suspected murdering case, but then like most Slashdotters said: It is not a murdering case if you can't proof that his wife is dead / found the body.

    202. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - that is NOT really true... after your arrest, you will be given an evaluation on whether or not you can afford an attorney, and if you have any kind of income (sales of his company is certainly an income), you will NOT be entitled to a public defender.

      Often this "vetting" process is quite extensive, as there is ample enough time to scour through financial records and such. The time interval between the arrainment and the prelim trial would give them ample time to conduct such an investigation, even through he may be "in-custody".

      So - NO, for those who don't live in the so called "Land of the free", you are NOT entitled to a free attorney if it can be proven you have assets to dig yourself into the deepest debt well you'll ever get into.

      As far as his accusations are concerned, lets please spare the sick jokes.. Being in the shithole Santa Rita is the worst possible place you can find yourself in...

      I also Know Hans, and really don't believe he would do such a dispicable thing like kill is wife, but I met him back in 86 or 87 at a trade show, and he gave me some work when I needed to make some money.... so lets please consider him innocent until proven guilty.

    203. Re:This is sad ... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      A jury isn't even supposed to interpret the law. Creating the law is the legislative branch. Interpreting the law is the judicial branch. A jury's purpose is to determine FACT. We, the people, are just a human lie detector. If 'lie detectors' and mind reading devices became available that were, to the satisfaction of the court, 100% reliable, it would be within the spirit of the founding fathers' intentions to replace jurys with these devices.

      By contrast, in most pre-United-States societies, the judge not only interpreted law, but also determined what was 'fact' in the case. The judge decided if witnesses were lying. Therefore, the judge alone was the sole arbiter of one's fate.

      To go into wonderful controversial territory, we'll take the old OJ Simpson case. His jury's sole responsibility was "Did OJ Simpson, beyond a reasonable doubt, cause the death of these two people?" By returning a verdict of "Not Guilty", the jury declared that they felt that there was not enough evidence, or the evidence was not believable enough, to convict. That's the way the system works. The jury determines what the facts are.

      Appeals cannot appeal what the jury determined were the facts of the case. An appeal only appeals for mistakes on the JUDGE's part, or the LAWYERs' parts, on their application of the law. So if a judge told a jury that a law meant "x", but the defendant thinks the law means "y", he can appeal. But once a jury has decided that "x" was lying, that fact can not be appealed. This is where most appeals fail. Because they try to appeal the FACTS of the case, not the application of LAW of the case. (You can't even appeal a law itself as a result of a verdict based on it. If I don't like the fact that a "statutory rape" law exists, and I get convicted of it, I can't appeal on the grounds that the law is invalid. I have to separately sue the state to invalidate the law.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    204. Re:This is sad ... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Should there be a law against free-market lawyers?

      Well, justice is supposed to be in the public domain. Not some proprietary system owned by a bunch of "crazy baldheads". The people who pay taxes for this system are the ones that should benefit. We are supposed to have a right to a fair trial. It shouldn't just go to the highest bidder. But...such is life.

      --
      What?
    205. Re:This is sad ... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Can I fork the lawyer...

      to see if he's done?

      Yes. You can.

      --
      What?
    206. Re:This is sad ... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      As Spock's brain ponders...Fascinating...

      --
      What?
    207. Re:This is sad ... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      that's what we do for his file system...

  11. KillerFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should start a collection to buy and rename it.

  12. I'll pay 10x revenues by winkydink · · Score: 3, Funny

    and that's not pennies on the dollar. Oh wait, it's actually pennies.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by joto · · Score: 0

      Hey, why are you talking about penis on the dollar. Oh wait, it's actually ponies.

    2. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by m-wielgo · · Score: 5, Funny

      wait, .002 dollars or .002 cents???

    3. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      99 or 100 cents on the dollar is still "pennies on the dollar", it's just a lot of them.

      Kinda like girls with push up bras: it's misleading, but it's not false advertising.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      "Kinda like girls with push up bras: it's misleading, but it's not false advertising."

      Bite your tongue!!! Push-up bras are most definitely false advertising :)

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    5. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by keithpreston · · Score: 1

      Push-up bras are not false advertising, just misleading.

      Padded bras are the real false advertising.

    6. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Push-up bras are most definitely false advertising :)

      No, just misleading. Now a GUY in drag that actually looks good, THAT'S false advertising.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:I'll pay 10x revenues by nacturation · · Score: 1

      99 or 100 cents on the dollar is still "pennies on the dollar", it's just a lot of them. Similar to saying "Buy now for a fraction of the price!". And since 3/2 is a fraction...
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  13. I Wish... by Morosoph · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You could occasionally /give/ mod points for a good post (down-mods would also cost 1 karma).

    Mod points would have to be added to the system to make up for down-mods, but you'd be able to put right moderation injustice yourself!

    Ps. Mod parent up! :o)

    1. Re:I Wish... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Making downmods cost will just result in a crappy system similar to the US justice system - those with the most mod points will always 'win'

      --
      which is totally what she said
  14. Aww... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 4, Funny

    FFS!

    --
    People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    1. Re:Aww... by SenorCitizen · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's Amiga FFS, for fuck's sake...

    2. Re:Aww... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's GNU/FFS, FFS!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  15. Truly this is sad... by bubulubugoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a company owner, this thing is so sad. But on the techinical aspect, ReiserFS has better numbers in i/o, read and write that ext3, but many, many times, the way Hans conducts himself, lead to more and more people running away from ReiserFS.

    Novell have just switched from reiser to ex3 at opensuse 10.1 or 10.2, I can't remember well, and this was the last "mayor" distribution supporting it. Any way, his company was loosing value, even more, his company is more like a one man company that a group of people. I doubt Namesys has CMMI, or follows any structured development strategy, so, buying a company whos best product is the sole creation of his owner is a very, very bad move.

    I hope he gets some money for his company.

    --
    Â_Â
    1. Re:Truly this is sad... by Bonker · · Score: 1

      As a company owner, this thing is so sad. But on the techinical aspect, ReiserFS has better numbers in i/o, read and write that ext3, but many, many times, the way Hans conducts himself, lead to more and more people running away from ReiserFS.

      I've been reading about Hans since the murder indictment, but haven't really found much besides technical details of ReiserFS. What kind of behavior is he known for that would cause people to avoid him, or his products?

      (Personally, I'm the sort to hold to the 'innocent before proven guilty' motto. No, I don't care if OJ's DNA was all over the bloody bodies of Ron and Nicole. He's innocent because the jury said so. Even if he killed the people, it's the price we pay for a merciful justice system.)

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Truly this is sad... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Online, he'd post rants in threads, and attack posters rather than sticking to the issues. He'd have gained wider acceptance and more contributors for ReiserFS if he were more people-friendly. I love the fact that ReiserFS is zero-slack. (I was finally forced to switch away from ReiserFS because Myth and ReiserFS do not cooperate well, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that XFS is actually more responsive, even though (like most filesystems) it wastes a lot of storage space.)

      Offline, Hans has a history of abusing his wife, anger issues, abusing his wife, and anger issues. The original story on the subject linked to past articles about the abuse and his overall character.

      I'd have to say that based on what evidence the media cites, it does not look too good for him and any jury in the world would find him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, unless the prosecutor REALLY screws up.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:Truly this is sad... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I've been reading about Hans since the murder indictment, but haven't really found much besides technical details of ReiserFS. What kind of behavior is he known for that would cause people to avoid him, or his products?

      It's ResierFS. Compare that to ext(2/3), HPFS, NTFS, HFS, XFS, ZFS, BFS, notice a pattern? You don't have to be a cynic to think maybe he's a little too interested in drumming up support for his consulting business. Obviously, it was successful or we wouldn't be seeing /. stories about him.

      More importantly, ReiserFS is developed primarily by Reiser/Namesys. If they dropped suport and moved on (or got arrested), nobody would be left to maintain it.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:Truly this is sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are at it, don't forget to discuss XiaFS

    5. Re:Truly this is sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a company owner, this thing is so sad. But on the techinical aspect, ReiserFS has better numbers in i/o, read and write than ext3, but many, many times, the way Hans conducts himself, leads to more and more people running away from ReiserFS.

      Novell have just switched from reiser to ex3 at opensuse 10.1 or 10.2, I can't remember well, and this was the last "major" distribution supporting it. Anyway, his company was losing value, even more, his company is more like a one man company that a group of people. I doubt Namesys has CMMI, or follows any structured development strategy, so, buying a company whose best product is the sole creation of its owner is a very, very bad move.

      I hope he gets some money for his company.


      There, fixed that for you. Seeing as you own a company, I hope you have a secretary that proofs your memos.

    6. Re:Truly this is sad... by bubulubugoth · · Score: 1

      thanks :) english is't my first languaje :)

      Most of the errors was from finger, and not of structure! :)

      This wasn't so bad.

      --
      Â_Â
    7. Re:Truly this is sad... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      (I was finally forced to switch away from ReiserFS because Myth and ReiserFS do not cooperate well, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that XFS is actually more responsive, even though (like most filesystems) it wastes a lot of storage space.)

      Ok, drifting slightly offtopic I admit - but I am using xfs for myth (for the same reasons - plus small files aren't a big issue with digital video). I'm about to migrate everything over to ext3 for a few reasons:

      1. Better support in linux in general.
      2. Can be resized larger OR SMALLER. (Though I admit the online resizing of xfs is great.)
      3. Better data protection with its journal behavior.
      4. XFS zeros out any open file in the event of a crash. When I discovered this behavior I IMMEDIATELY migrated everything but myth off of it (I don't have hundreds of gigs of spare space, so myth will take a little longer).

      xfs has its uses, but I'm not thrilled about what I've read so far in terms of data reliability, and I'd like the flexibility to resize in either direction (with lvm it is nice to be able to repartition on demand).

    8. Re:Truly this is sad... by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      IIRC, he actually called it "TreeFS" or something like that in the beginning, but somebody had a trademark on that, so he named it after himself to be absolutely sure that there wouldn't be more problems.

  16. How about DSFS... by davmoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Deep Shit File System

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  17. No - OJFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name it the OJ FS, and wish him the same justice?

    1. Re:No - OJFS by kennygraham · · Score: 1

      "If I'd Been A Filesystem", only $9.99 at amazon

  18. time for the linux community to intervene by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think someone from slashdot needs to step up and confess to this murder. ReiserFS is a hell of a filesystem ... I would do it myself but I have an alibi. So who wants to be our patsy?

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:time for the linux community to intervene by Dissman · · Score: 4, Funny

      CowboyNeal did it. In the parlor, with the bookend.

      *puts clue game away.*

    2. Re:time for the linux community to intervene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK fine, I'll come clean. It was me.

    3. Re:time for the linux community to intervene by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      I say it was CmdrTaco, in the Server Room, with the broken hard drive.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    4. Re:time for the linux community to intervene by owlstead · · Score: 1

      This must be the truth; it's almost always an Anonymous Coward that does the killing.

  19. Microsoft Could Buy It by BenFranske · · Score: 1

    Maybe Microsoft could buy it and change the name to WinFS. It seems this might be the only way for them to get it out the door. It worked wonders for them with QDOS.

    1. Re:Microsoft Could Buy It by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      er... you're aware that "WinFS" is market speak and not an actual file system, right?

      I'm not saying that it's perfect, but MS already has a journaling filesystem (NTFS).

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:Microsoft Could Buy It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now it's "Embrace—Extend—Innocent until proven guilty"?

    3. Re:Microsoft Could Buy It by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1
      So now it's "Embrace--Extend--Innocent until proven guilty"?
      Nope, it's "Embrace-Extend-Ignore being proven guilty".
  20. you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    LawyerFS

    m10

    1. Re:you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LawyerFS motto: All your cache are belong to us ...

  21. ReiserFS by AlanS2002 · · Score: 1

    Who would buy it with Reiser3 being used less and less and with Reiser4 not fully implemented in the Linux Kernel?

    --
    Not all conservatives are stupid,
    but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
    - Hume
    1. Re:ReiserFS by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      Who would buy it Microsoft?
      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  22. Give the money to his kids by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps he might get more takers and a higher price if the proceeds from the sale were used to set up a trust for his kids. They don't have a mother and their father will probably be in prison until he dies. Human buyers will make a more emotional connection with helping his kids than they will helping the defense of a murder suspect.

    1. Re:Give the money to his kids by kg4czo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummm.... It says he needs the money to help pay for his defense. I understand the "what about the children" concern, and I would normally agree with you. The article makes it pretty clear that his current concern is making sure he has a decent lawyer instead of a shit bag public defender that's less inclined to put up a fight. I suppose that if he does get off on a lack of evidence (no body), he would make sure his kids are taken care of, if he can. Child Protective Services would probably fight to keep his kids away from their father under the pretense that he's possibly dangerous.

      Things don't look well for him at this point anyway....

    2. Re:Give the money to his kids by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      "They don't have a mother and their father will probably be in prison until he dies."

      In prison until he dies? For one measly murder? Yeah, right.... it's possible, but these days, not likely.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    3. Re:Give the money to his kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The best way to do this is to donate money to the The Nina Reiser Fund.

      http://www.ninareiser.com/donate.html

    4. Re:Give the money to his kids by AlanS2002 · · Score: 1

      Have you Yanks done away with habeas corpus or something?

      --
      Not all conservatives are stupid,
      but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
      - Hume
    5. Re:Give the money to his kids by Bastian · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's this hay-bee-us cor-puss you speak of?

      -a yank

    6. Re:Give the money to his kids by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      True. It's not like he was growing pot or something. He just killed someone (maybe). Throw the book at him! By which I mean, 2 years.

      Unless he was growing pot. Then give him the chair. That's the way we like to do it.

    7. Re:Give the money to his kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Give money to the kids at The Nina Reiser Fund:

      http://www.ninareiser.com/donate.html

    8. Re:Give the money to his kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also known as the lying cheating dead bitch fund.
      Yeah, sure it will go to the kids.

    9. Re:Give the money to his kids by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      He's not selling the company because he wants to get rid of it. He's selling it because he needs money for his legal defense. How does giving the proceeds to his children accomplish his goal?

    10. Re:Give the money to his kids by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      Of course not. I believe in due process and the fact that the burden of proof lies with the state in criminal proceedings. However, given a choice of how to spend my personal money, I'd give it to his kids before I personally funded his legal defense. That's my right as a free man in a free society.

    11. Re:Give the money to his kids by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Ummm...for first degree murder he'll likely get death. I don't know how things are in Europe or in Massachusetts, but most of the United States take a very dim view of wife-murdering.

      He may get life for first degree murder; if it's second degree murder he'll get the same. From what's been reported, things look very, very bad for him.

    12. Re:Give the money to his kids by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      In much of the USA, you still won't get death for first-degree, but only if it's aggravated. That's even if the state HAS the death penalty, and then the guy has to be convicted without plea-bargaining out of the death penalty. And, even then, it's not given out often - and especially in light of the recent controversy over the "botched" execution.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    13. Re:Give the money to his kids by reverius · · Score: 1
  23. My bet by Apostata · · Score: 1

    One of the big boys is going to come a 'callin: MS, Apple, or IBM. Good-bye "Reiser FS", hello "insert MarketingSpeak here" (I'm thinking someting inoffensive and corporate, like "YouFS" or "MSRULZ4VR").

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:My bet by bubbl07 · · Score: 1
      One of the big boys is going to come a 'callin: MS, Apple, or IBM. Good-bye "Reiser FS", hello "insert MarketingSpeak here" (I'm thinking someting inoffensive and corporate, like "YouFS" or "MSRULZ4VR").

      If Apple bought it, it would most certainly be called iFS.

      IBM already has a filesystem, so maybe IFS?.

      And no one cares about Microsoft.
    2. Re:My bet by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      IFS is already a file system used by IBM.

      It's used on the System i (formerly known as iSeries, formerly known as AS/400), and offers unix-like characterists.

  24. sounds fishy by theMerovingian · · Score: 4, Funny


    Reiser was arrested Oct. 10 after the Oakland Police Department found small drops of blood in his house and on his Honda CRX.

    I'm not sure I'd want to buy a company from someone driving a Honda CRX...

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:sounds fishy by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I'm not sure I'd want to buy a company from someone driving a Honda CRX...

      Out here in the Rest Of the World it is considered one of the first pure Hot Hatches. People race them, you know.

      I thought it was a bit strange when mythbusters needed a small old car to trash and a viewer gave them a Fiat X1/9 which he described as "that piece of euro shit which has been cluttering up my drive way for five years". Where I live people pay big money for that exact car to do up and drive around in. Maybe Americans should just ban foreign cars on the basis of job protection.

    2. Re:sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Out here in the Rest Of the World it is considered one of the first pure Hot Hatches. People race them, you know.
      Um, I also live in Europe, and I agree with the grandparent. People also race old busted-up Volvos, that doesn't make them especially valuable, and they do not exactly inspire other people to place trust in their drivers.

      The CRX is a fun old toy but as cars go, it's a piece of shit, in Europe and elsewhere. Get over it. (Posting anon to save my karma from the ricer mods.)
    3. Re:sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I'd want to buy a company from someone driving a Honda CRX...

      Why, exactly? Is this supposed to be funny?

    4. Re:sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this Honda CRX? It's also not uncommon to have the passenger seats removed in a car used for racing.

    5. Re:sounds fishy by updog · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you've ever seen his CRX - but I have, he parked it every day in a parking garage in Palo Alto, CA, when he worked at Digeo. It was actually a crappy old red CRX if I remember correctly. Anyway the funny this about his CRX was the license plate holder: it said "Trees are fast". Funny if you know anything about ReiserFS...

    6. Re:sounds fishy by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Fiat X1/9 *is* a piece of shit though, unless you do one hour of maintenance for every hour you get to drive it. They are terribly fragile and unreliable unless you do a great deal of maintenance. Americans are used to cars that are built like tanks and do 300,000 miles needing only oil changes and perhaps a new set of spark plugs every so often.

      While the X1/9 is probably a good car to do up or to own as an enthusiast, it's no good for a daily drive because it's so unreliable. Many European cars built at around that time were also pretty terrible, reliability wise - even if they WERE very stylish and nice to drive. I loved my old Mini - good fun, timeless design - but reliable it was not. It needed constant maintenance. The vast majority of Americans aren't prepared to put up with cars that need constant maintenance.

    7. Re:sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I'd want to buy a company from someone driving a Honda CRX...

      But it was lowered with rim extensions to put some 12 inch rims out the wheel wells with skinnie tyers on them to look phat. then the car had 3 color neon all over the underside, R type stickers all over the hood and sides and to top it off a set of 3 level aluminum wings put on the back to increase the racing downforce even though it's a front wheel drive car.

      Finally the rear was being cut out to install a 18 inch sewer pipe for a tailpipe.

      Shit yo! that was one fly motherfucker! If he coded as good as he pimped hondas then your PC will go supafast.

    8. Re:sounds fishy by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      So you'd rather buy a company from someone who really knows how to put on a show...who buys things that aren't practical for the sole purpose of impressing other people? Then how would you know that the company you are about to buy doesn't just have some pretty front end slapped on it, and it's really in shambles at the core?

      Most of the rich people in this world aren't people with insane wealth or lottery winners. They are people of ordinary means who know how to not squander what they have and instead turn it into something impressive. You'd be impressed with how many millionaires there are living in ordinary subdivisions driving simple cars that are probably a little beyond their time, but still serve their purpose well enough.

    9. Re:sounds fishy by temojen · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, did you say racing or ricing? What's the roof scoop for?

    10. Re:sounds fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true enough - one of my friends' dad was a corporate lawyer, made a fortune; he drove around in an old compact pickup (purchased used) with no a/c. You really don't want to correlate wealth (or in this case, business acumen) & conspicuous consumption.

    11. Re:sounds fishy by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      That's because you don't know much about cars. Honda CRX is a legendary car. Today, in 2006 owning one in good condition is like owning a classic Mustang. A preserved CRX (0 miles or about that) costs between 30K and 40K today, because unfortunately there's no supply to meet demand (in its time collectors didn't recognize the value). I was looking for a preserved CRX about two months ago and found only two in the entire US. Needless to say, both sellers wanted upper 30's for the car and neither would bulge.

    12. Re:sounds fishy by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Roof scoop? You must be seeing things...

  25. Re:WinFS by Fyre2012 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, DOS is an Operating System. ReiserFS is a FILEsystem.

    If you mean Windows should drop NTFS, purchase this, rebrand it and have it ready for Vista's release, than i think you're either trolling or a little naive.

    heh, maybe Hans was in deals to sell it to MS (WinFS), but his concience ate away at him, and he ultimately refused. In return, they killed his wife, and now they get their FS on the CHEAP!

    --
    This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
  26. FFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name it F

  27. MurderFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MurderFS. Naah, I don't think that would work.

  28. Why not GoogleFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't Google have $$$ to burn now?

  29. Where is Cochran when you need him? by Browzer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if he has an explanation for her blood drops in his house and on his Honda.

    1. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't need Cochran, because he taught us the only technique that Hans needs: The Chewbacca Defense.

      Hans, your only hope to strike back is to use the Chewbacca Defense and maybe then a new hope will rise upon your dark side of the story.

    2. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's with Nina Reiser.

    3. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by foo_pie · · Score: 1

      I happen to be a clutz, but a very live one who knows that collecting a few drops of hi dried blood might not be that hard. I've bled at home. I've bled in cars. I've bled at my mom's house. I've probably bled on a sleeping bag too at some point. It'd be easy to jump to conclusions in this case, and those may indeed be correct conclusions, but is it right to jump there without any shadow of reasonable doubt, esp. while there still is no body?

    4. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women have this thing called menstruation.

    5. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by Browzer · · Score: 1

      And they love to menstruate especially on top of foreign cars.

    6. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1
      --
      -- Jason
    7. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      since this is slashdot, maybe some information about women might be helpful. They don't make a conscious decision where and when to stop and resume menstruation. for example, if they happen to be on top a car they don't think "gee, I think I better stop menstruating since I'm on a nice foreign car, but I'll then resume five minutes after I climb down". Otherwise I'd ask my wife, could you please shut down for tonight so we can have some fun. Hope this helps.

    8. Re:Where is Cochran when you need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he taught us the only technique that Hans needs: The Chewbacca Defense.

      If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

  30. SturgeonFS by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    He's already taken the rest of his stuff.

  31. Prosecute murder with no body? by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can they actually prosecute a homicide with no body?
    What would happen if he were convicted, and then Ms. Reiser shows up?
    How can you claim someone is guilty of murder before you have declared the
    victim is dead? Or if the victim is dead, has life insurance been collected, for instance?
    I really don't see how you can have "murder" without a body, remains of a body, or some specific claim as to how the body was disposed of.

    On the other hand, I *can* see how you could justify holding such a suspect without bail, sort of.
    He should, at a minimum, explain where the seat from his Honda can be found. Seems like that might clear up a few things. (They locate that seat, find it isn't covered with blood and bone fragments or whatever they expect to find... That sort of thing would be pretty embarrassing to the prosecution, I'd guess.)

    Of course, if I were a betting man, my money would not exactly be riding on Hans' innocence. The car seat bothers me a lot. (The State of California is required to presume his innocence, but I am not, unless I happen to get called on his jury...)

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Can they actually prosecute a homicide with no body?

      Yes, even if you try to blame it on a dingo.

    2. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      What would happen if he were convicted, and then Ms. Reiser shows up?

      Then he would still be convicted, because he can't be tried again, that'd be Double Jeopardy. I'll take File Systems for $1000, please, Alex.

    3. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      IANAL bla bla bla

      But that would be considered 'new evidence' and would allow for a retrial I thought.

    4. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Informative

      the key is to get convicted... then get appealed for lack of some evidence. (If a case is just dropped without conviction..like they used to do on Matlock or Perry Mason with "last minute" courtroom revelations, then you haven't been CONVICTED and it's just starts a new crime-trial cycle. In those cases the case is not acquitted, it's withdwawn...a big difference!) At that point you have been guilty, and can't be re-guilty. The key is to find the "dead" person in between times and REALLY knock them off. Because if the person actually shows up there's ways they can undo the conviction. But if they don't "offically" present themselves... like they're trying to run away illegally and set you up... they might be harmed. At that point, even if the police DID find the body, you were convicted of a crime on X date, and this body is obviously fresh...

    5. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by jacquems · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really don't see how you can have "murder" without a body, remains of a body, or some specific claim as to how the body was disposed of.

      It's entirely possible to make a conviction based on circumstantial evidence, such as the suspect having a strong motive (like opening a new life insurance policy on the victim) or finding evidence of intent (such as plans or a list of supplies for committing the murder) after the victim's disappearance. There could also be physical evidence to indicate that the victim had sustained non-survivable injuries, such as finding that the victim bled a fatal amount of blood in the suspect's house.

      Also, as you pointed out, convictions have been made based on witnesses to and evidence of body disposal. I don't remember the exact case, but it involved the victim's body being put into a large cooler, carried onto a boat (this was observed by a witness), and dumped at sea. The cooler was also dumped, and the suspects shot holes in it in an effort to make it sink. However, it floated, and was found by a fisherman, who decided it was a perfectly good cooler, even though it had bullet holes in it, was missing its lid, and was covered in what he thought was fish blood. When investigators asked around about the cooler, the fisherman turned it over to them. I think they may have found some traces of the victim's blood in it, and they could tie it to the witness who saw the suspects carrying it onto their boat. They got a conviction in that case.

      (IANAL, IANACSI)

    6. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      If they're sure she's dead, then sure.

    7. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by omeg · · Score: 1

      In the US legal system, you can. There is no real legal argument that prevents you from charging someone with murder, even if there is no body. All you have to prove is that the person is never going to walk back in alive. I consider that impossible myself...

    8. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Of course, if I were a betting man, my money would not exactly be riding on Hans' innocence.''

      No. If you're a betting man, you would be betting on whether he would get convicted or not. While one hopes that coincides with his innocence, it's not the same thing.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    9. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by chucken · · Score: 1

      Not sure about American law versus British or elsewhere, but there have been convictions without bodies, yes: http://www.sclomax.co.uk/glynrazzell.htm http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200612/s18119 08.htm http://tafkac.org/legal/no_body_not_no_murder.html One of the links seems to be saying that Texas is the only state where you aboslutely have to have a body. I recall reading about a case a while back (can't find cite now, sorry) whereby there was no body but the cops found prosthetic body organ parts of some sort (heart valve? or similar) in a vat of acid. It was enough to convict the main suspect of the murder.

    10. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The key is to find the "dead" person in between times and REALLY knock them off.

      That is ridiculous. Murder is a physical act, and if you murder somebody after you've already been convicted of killing them, clearly the murder that occurred after your trial already ended, it is a different criminal act than what you were originally convicted for. Don't worry though, they'd reverse your prior conviction before throwing you back in jail; even though technically they wouldn't have to.

      You don't get convicted for murder. You get convicted for murder of person x at time y in location z. Making x y and z the same for the 'second' killing is a big job.

    11. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by concept10 · · Score: 1

      You, sir, do not watch enough TV. This episode comes on at least one a month on Cold Cases.

    12. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      "The car seat bothers me a lot."

      Well obviously you dont do your own work on cars. Ive had various parts of my car removed for various lengths of time (new carpet installation for instance). I would hate to think that just because its not what YOU would choose to do with a car, that it should be illegal, or a sign of guilt when other people do it. Its pretty easy to pull the seats out of a car and there are a bunch of reasons for doing it and not installing it back right away.

      I dont know alot about this case but yes i agree with you that he should produce the seat, and cant really see a reason for him not to. The other more likely possibility is that it was a setup. He went down to the parking garage one morning, found his dead ex wife in the seat blugoned to death, and reacted the way any sane person would - by carving up the body and disposing of the evidence.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    13. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by xeno-cat · · Score: 1

      I thought she was eventually found inocent? Though the dingo seems to have gotten away with it.

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
    14. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      On appeal the biological evidence like the possible blood in the car was no longer in a usable state or even identifiable as blood after a few years in tropical heat. If a dingo was the sole agent it was capable of using scissors to cut the babies clothing and then neatly buried them seperately. It remains a mystery and resulted in improvements in storage of evidence in Australia. I mentioned it because of the blood in the car in both cases.

      It wasn't a matter of whether the dingo did it - it was a matter of there not being enough evidence to prove it was Lindy and not someone else, and there is only a sighting of a dingo hours earlier to indicate a dingo might have done it. Dingos do eat British backpackers on occasion so it did sound like a plausable story until the other evidence turned up.

    15. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >If they're sure she's dead, then sure.

      I expect they are sure she is *missing*, but why do they even suspect she is *dead?* That's the point where I have not been able to follow this case really.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    16. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >Well obviously you dont do your own work on cars.

      Last week I sold what had been my eighth aircooled volkswagen. Believe me, I have done a *lot* of my own work on a *lot* of cars.

      One thing I know is that if I were being accused of murder, and one of the bits of circumstantial evidence against me was a front seat missing from my car, I'd have an explanation as to where that seat might be found, and I'd try really, really hard to help you find it so you could see it wasn't saturated with the victim's blood, etc. If that was a life-or-death priority, I'm sure I would do my best to stop it being a mystery.

      I imagine the police expect to find that car seat near wherever they find the victim's body.
      It is very, very hard to completely dispose of a human body without any trace whatsoever. The fact that they have not found it, leaves the question open as to whether the woman is actually dead. I certainly believe that it should be first shown that the victim is actually dead, before the M word is brought up. So far, she is simply missing. Maybe she was chained up somewhere, and starved to death because Hans was in jail, unable to release her or feed her; how's that for a macabre twist?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    17. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kenneth McDuff was convicted in Texas without the body of Colleen Reed. He finally provided the location of her remains a few weeks before he was executed.

    18. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading that they had actually located remains of the child's clothing or some other such evidence that pointed to the dingo having actually been the culprit? Perhaps that's what the GP was referring to.

    19. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The childs clothing had been cut along it's length with a sharp instrument (suspected to be scissors) and buried - which would indicate any dingo had an accomplice that used tools instead of teeth. There was no sign of blood on the clothing.

    20. Re:Prosecute murder with no body? by xeno-cat · · Score: 1

      I was refering to the movie that was made about the incident, "A Cry in the Dark".

      In that movie it's the finding of the childs clothing that gets the case thrown out after the mother had served several years of her sentence. Now you are saying that, in fact, the state of the babies clothing suggests murder after all?!

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
  32. This could be bad by Trogre · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can only add one comment to what's already been said with a quick prayer:

    Please not Microsoft Please not Microsoft Please not Microsoft Please not Microsoft Please not Microsoft

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  33. MICRO$SOFT WILL PROFIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will buy the company destroy the products and merge them into Windoze.

    Why do people still use Windoze? The feature set sucks and is good only for novices.

  34. oh great by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    here comes the GoldenPalace.com file system

    those guys will buy anything if it gets them a free bit of news/ pr

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  35. the most tasteless entry? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

    The IToldYouNotToBotherMeWhenImCodingBitch file system.

    1. Re:the most tasteless entry? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      You are so going to hell. ;)

    2. Re:the most tasteless entry? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are so going to hell. ;)

      Maybe, but at least I'll have a killer filesystem once I get there. :)

  36. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    heh, maybe Hans was in deals to sell it to MS (WinFS), but his concience ate away at him, and he ultimately refused. In return, they killed his wife, and now they get their FS on the CHEAP!
    dude! You should be writing crappy murder mysteries - don't waste that fertile mind of yours, cash in! (But 1 caveat: don't mention Microsoft, even if you as the author know they're really behind each book's murder. Pick any common English given name for the bad guy except Bill -- though you're free to call him that in your head. Good luck!)
  37. Possible name by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Funny

    OJSystem
    .
    .
    .
    (for Open Journaled System, of course)

    1. Re:Possible name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OJ File System: "If the transaction won't commit, the journaling must acquit!"

  38. Paypal me! by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm collecting donations to buy reiserfs so I can release it under the GPL. Paypal me at mailto:slash@example.com!

    1. Re:Paypal me! by cedriclbox · · Score: 1

      you should take only promises and make a foundation. like rhyzom. or people may think its just rip-off..... (they may be right a is knows) :)))

  39. Oblig Simpsons by cybercobra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lionel Hutz: Can you imagine what a world without lawyers would be like?
    (Thought bubble with people from different cultures dancing around merrily in a circle while holding hands)
    Lionel Huts: Uggggh.

  40. Vultures by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was thinking there was a REALLY bad-taste joke in there somewhere.

    You know - If the vultures are circling, it's 'cos there's a corpse nearby.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    1. Re:Vultures by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Looking for REALLY bad-taste jokes?

      This is a good opportunity to own a filesystem and rename it

      MurderFS

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Vultures by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Funny

      If ReiserFS uses a magic value somewhere, I suggest it to be changed to 0xDEADBABE.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    3. Re:Vultures by somersault · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just a ploy to find those who would want to frame him? Though I don't know the details of the murder or whether he's likely to be guilty or innocent. Sounds pretty bad to me. Anyway, my suggestions:

      OFFS (oh-ffs)
      NiceTryFS

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Vultures by rikkards · · Score: 1

      That's a perfect name:
      CorpseFS!

    5. Re:Vultures by ded_guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It puts the 'stab' in fstab!

      --
      In the future, all spacecraft will be made of cheese.
    6. Re:Vultures by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Cheers! This has to be one of the best geek jokes I've seen on Slashdot. My own (recycled from the first article) was that it should be easy to crack the case. Hans never does anything without writing it down first.

    7. Re:Vultures by byteframe · · Score: 0

      That was a good one.

  41. WiKiFS by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Or WiKiFiSy... Wife Killer File System.

  42. Booksmart. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    My thought exactly...
     
    Its especially interesting because hes supposed to be a smart guy. You'd think the last thing you want to do is purchase a book He's a smart guy allright.

    When you want to do something you don't how to do, you find a book that tells you how to do it.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Booksmart. by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Nah, a really smart guy would buy the book as a present for his mistress, so when the police come looking, they arrest her, you are rid of both of them and you can get back to some serious codeing.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  43. Re:WinFS by Bin_jammin · · Score: 0

    Uh, I think he already is writing crappy murder mysteries. See above.

  44. Links refering to ReiserFS by AlanS2002 · · Score: 1
    --
    Not all conservatives are stupid,
    but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
    - Hume
  45. Ssshttt ! by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Now *you* mentioned it to those guys !

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  46. bad joke on lawyer's name by sid77 · · Score: 1

    uhm... as I really don't know how the fs is implemented, I think that reiserfs surely does black magic under my box but why does hans choose a medium for his own defense?!?

  47. Funny... by thrill12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...I read topics of people having various non-eating related cookbooks in their homes on Slashdot, and each time this is referred to as "innocent reading material" (or something along those lines) rather than a prelude to terrorism - even though the police could view it in that way when someone is arrested on related charges.
    The finding of this book (I'm not talking about other findings) and supposing any connection of this book to the murdering is therefore kind of not-Slashdot like : he could just have been generally interested in murder, perhaps a big CSI fan or something ?
    It's supporting evidence at most.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Funny... by Kelson · · Score: 1
      perhaps a big CSI fan or something

      Funny you should mention CSI. "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets" was the basis for a TV series that ran from 1993-1999. I had a girlfriend in college who was a big fan of the show, and freaked one of my friends out once by blurting out, "Homicide rules!" in conversation. Interestingly enough, she was a criminology major...

    2. Re:Funny... by ricree · · Score: 1

      I never seem to have mod points when I really need them. I agree completely. Heck, wasn't one of the biggest complaints people had about the patriot act was the way it allowed the government to look into your library records.

    3. Re:Funny... by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And a missing front seat? Perhaps it was raining, and he forgot to close the door and the seat was spoiled - which would explain the soked rug. Lets see a body before we call it murder...

    4. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      ...I read topics of people having various non-eating related cookbooks in their homes on Slashdot, and each time this is referred to as "innocent reading material" (or something along those lines) rather than a prelude to terrorism - even though the police could view it in that way when someone is arrested on related charges.

      You've got it a little confused. The police didn't name him as a suspect because of the books. They didn't even start investigating him because of the books. He already had a motive and a bunch of evidence pointing at him. The books just make it that much more suspicious.

      With the patriot act, the government would be able to search for all the people who had bought the books or checked them out from the library, name all of them as suspects, and then investigate all of them at their leisure.

      It's a pretty big difference, really.

    5. Re:Funny... by TheCubic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Jimmy Hoffa is alive and well...

      I've watched enough lawyer-based TV shows to know that unless he hires James Spader or Woods he's pretty much screwed.

      Should the FSF buy it? How many pennies are we talking about here?

    6. Re:Funny... by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget it's very difficult to get rid of blood traces from a car mat doesn't matter what you use (you may destroy the abilty for anyone to identify whose blood it is but not that there was blood there).

    7. Re:Funny... by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm saying that the cops planted them to "seal the deal."

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    8. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, just saying the car is a "Honda" doesn't mean much. What it really is is a rice rocket, one of those little two-door souped up Civics. In fact, a two-seater, in other words, no back seats at all. When these things are used for racing, it's hardly uncommon for the passenger seat to be removed (less weight == more speed faster). No idea if he was into that kind of thing, but you usually only buy one of those cars if you've got at least some interest in that area.

    9. Re:Funny... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      having various non-eating related cookbooks in their homes on Slashdot, and each time this is referred to as "innocent reading material" (or something along those lines) rather than a prelude to terrorism

      I didn't realize that the Perl Cookbook was so controversial!

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    10. Re:Funny... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Absent from the reports is an explanation of why the seat is missing, for example, where it might be found. Find the seat, find it free of blood and bone fragments. I think that should be a real priority of the defense. Are Honda interior parts serial number matched, by any chance?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:Funny... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      He should hire James Spader AND William Shatner.

      That way, if he loses in court, he can get Scotty to beam some tribbles down to the court room.. and in the ensuing mayhem, escape through the gate to Abidos.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    12. Re:Funny... by sponga · · Score: 1

      Yes and obviously his wife was on her period which is why her matched blood was found at his mothers house and sleeping bag.

    13. Re:Funny... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I immediately thought he was talking about Don Lancaster's cookbooks:

      # TTL Cookbook (Macmillan, May 1974). Paperback ISBN 0-672-21035-5
      # RTL Cookbook
      # TV Typewriter Cookbook (January 1976). ISBN 0-672-21313-3
      # The Cheap Video Cookbook (Sams, May 1978). Paperback ISBN 0-672-21524-1
      # CMOS Cookbook 1st (Sams, 1980). ISBN 0-672-21398-2, 2nd rev. (Butterworth-Heinemann, January 1997). ISBN 0-7506-9943-4
      # Don Lancaster's Micro Cookbook (Sams, October 1982). Paperback ISBN 0-672-21828-3
      # Assembly Cookbook for Apple II/IIE (Sams, July 1984). Paperback ISBN 0-672-22331-7
      # Applewriter Cookbook (January 1986). Paperback ISBN 0-672-22460-7
      # Lancaster's Active Filter Cookbook (Butterworth-Heinemann, August 1996). Paperback ISBN 0-7506-2986-X

      Don is also quite slashdot-y:

      # The Case Against Patents : Selected Reprints from "Midnight Engineering" & "Nuts & Volts" Magazines (Synergetics Press, January 1996). Paperback ISBN 1-882193-71-7

      Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lancaster

      I personally found the introduction to the TV Typerwriter Cookbook quite hilarious --

      It seems Don was visiting a friend in the hospital, and wanted to bring him a terminal (you know, like a DEC VT100 or a Tektronix 4107). But terminals were not on the "allowed for patients" list that the security guard had, and so he was not allowed to bring it into the hospital.

      So, he got a look at the list, and came back later. The guard asked him what the terminal was. Don told him it was a TV Typewriter. The guard checks his list: "TV? Okay. Typewriter? Okay. I guess a TV Typewriter is okay too, then!".

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    14. Re:Funny... by Splab · · Score: 1

      You know what, you are going to find traces of my blood alot of places - I've left it on various kitchen knives, slippery spots and most other places where it's possible for me to hurt myself by doing something stupid - but that doesn't mean I've been killed in any of those places.

  48. Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Name is Harry Kunt. I'd like to buy your ReiserFS and call it Kunt. Please get back to me ASAP.

  49. IIDIFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I Did It FS

  50. So I married a kernel programmer by CortoMaltese · · Score: 2, Funny
  51. In the case of a murder, by hummassa · · Score: 1

    I would prefer to read anonymously stuff on the local library or on the internet, and watching all seasons of all CSI and CSI-like shows. Anyone who has ever _watched_ them would think, for instance, that "it's not viable to properly clean a car that transported a dead/dying person" and arrange for its "theft" and set it on a (full of accelerant) fire. But murdering your ex-wife is never a smart thing to do anyway.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  52. wife would be no loss by r00t · · Score: 0, Troll

    If I were on the jury, I'd vote innocent even if I did think he killed her. (and I do think that)

    She was NOT a good woman, by a long shot.

    1. Re:wife would be no loss by GC · · Score: 1

      By saying that you obviously won't be taking on jury service, ever.

    2. Re:wife would be no loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you seem to assume people don't lie while getting selected for jury duty.
      A lot of people lie to get excused, but it can work the other way quite well too.

    3. Re:wife would be no loss by MechaStreisand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What did she actually do? Can you summarize?

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    4. Re:wife would be no loss by r00t · · Score: 1

      There are the known things, and the things for which we'd have to trust Hans.
      (Hans appears to be telling the truth about at much of this at least)

      Suspected: had an affair
      Suspected: transferred lots of money to that guy
      Suspected: various criminal attempts to rid herself of Hans
      Known: left Hans
      Known: took children away from Hans
      Suspected: tried to ensure Hans wouldn't see his children
      Known: made divorce into a cruel battle to take everything

      It's not as if this were a girlfriend. They were married.
      Wedding vows should last until death do you part.

      (if they were unmarried, I'd say Hans deserves to fry)

  53. Re:Mod system failure by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    And only one moron who couldn't be warned by the subject line. Congratulations, you win!

  54. The hassel by Dilaudid · · Score: 1

    What's the hof got to do with this? You'll be bringing kit into it next...

  55. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the GP employed something we know as "sarcasm".

  56. Can you sue justice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If in order to defend yourself, you have to have a company and even sell it, then for all practical reasons there is no justice for the majority of people. I find this state of affairs troubling, and I was wandering if you could sue "justice". ie, the justice ministry for example.

    GD

    1. Re:Can you sue justice? by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1
      If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense.

      In all likelyhood Mr. Reiser has merely realized he needs to get the best lawyer all his money can buy.

    2. Re:Can you sue justice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have watched one of those provided lawyers during a murder trial. I would not choose him to be my lawyer; I would rather represent myself.

      I see his name in the local paper every once in a while; I do not believe he has ever won a case.

      Let's see - locked in jail, so you can not visit to/call lawyers to find one to represent you. You can not hire an investigator to dig up evidence to clear yourself.
      Add to that a judge and prosecutor that are essentialy on the same side- they get their paycheck from the same place, they work together often. The judge has his opinion, framed by the evidence and arguments provided by his coworker the prosecutor - think the trial is going to be fair?

      Google 'jury nullification' then point out an example of even one judge that won't slap you down for memtioning those words in a courtroom. We had one person here on Long Island that mentioned it during pre-trial questioning (in direct repsonse to an asked question) and the judge socked him with contempt just for answering truthfully. Forget that NY State supreme court has upheld it, as has the US Supreme court; it doesn't matter if the trial judge does not allow it, and the appeals court decides (as they always have) that suppressing it did not result in an unfair trial.

      Then if you are found innocent, you can not sue the Prosecutor even if he knows you are innocent, manufactures fake evidence and hides exculpatory evidence due to absolute immunity granted to him.

      Lesson to be learned - if you are being investigated by the police, hire a good lawyer right away, even (especially) if you are innocent. Consider it insurance- pay now or the payment might be worse later on.

  57. Won't change a thing by olenikm · · Score: 0, Troll

    Won't change that all the mouthbreathers around here can't realize what a horrible file system Reiser4 is. And how Reiser3 isn't even that great anyway.

    1. Re:Won't change a thing by matt74441 · · Score: 1

      I do have to agree with you on that. I've used ReiserFS on and off for a few years and I've only ever encountered problems with it (mostly unexplained filesystem corruptions), which is why I no longer use it. I wonder if Hans told the people over at Namesys that he was selling them off to save his own ass?

    2. Re:Won't change a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but you used it with software raid and/or networked file systems. I know this because that is the way to make the file system corrupt. Other than that it does not do that. Samba/NFS+software raid = ouch. Always, except on ext2/3.

    3. Re:Won't change a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ermm.. why would those corrupt a file system?

      Samba is just a user-space application. It does not really care which file system you use. The same goes for any NFS server, although NFS servers can also run in kernel space to improve performance. (Samba could be run in kernel space as well, but no one has done this AFAIK.)

      File systems run on top of a block device. Software RAID creates a block device from multiple block devices. No reason why it would corrupt the file systems unless the software RAID code has bugs, but then you'd see other file systems crash as well.

  58. How much is it worth? by haeger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How much is it worth without Hans Reiser? He's the lead architect isn't he, the one with all the good ideas. Or is he a part of the deal. If aquitted he'll come work for you and if not you'll provide him with a laptop in his cell?

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:How much is it worth? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How much is it worth without Hans Reiser?

      Talk about unintended consequences.

      When your company's sole product is named after the lead developer, it makes it awfully difficult to convince anyone that there is much ongoing value in that product once the namesake is out of the picture.

      Reiser may end up on death row because he was unable to raise enough funds to hire a good enough attorney. All because he named the product after himself instead of something more generic. Who would have guessed that he might pay for that bit of ego indulgement with his life?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:How much is it worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How much is it worth without Hans Reiser?
      Talk about unintended consequences.

      When your company's sole product is named after the lead developer, it makes it awfully difficult to convince anyone that there is much ongoing value in that product once the namesake is out of the picture.

      Reiser may end up on death row because he was unable to raise enough funds to hire a good enough attorney. All because he named the product after himself instead of something more generic. Who would have guessed that he might pay for that bit of ego indulgents with his life?
      IronyFS.
    3. Re:How much is it worth? by Kynde · · Score: 1

      Reiser may end up on death row because he was unable to raise enough funds to hire a good enough attorney. All because he named the product after himself instead of something more generic. Who would have guessed that he might pay for that bit of ego indulgement with his life?

      Torvalds, you listening there?

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    4. Re:How much is it worth? by archen · · Score: 1

      Isn't that supposed to be one of the intended consequences of naming a product or business after yourself? You are expected to hold your name in good standing not only for yourself but for your business/product - which is more than likely your lively hood as well. I think back in the day this was a selling point that a real name actually stood behind something instead of generic brand X.

      There is also a philosophy that putting a name behind something can put more power behind it. See Trump's book.

    5. Re:How much is it worth? by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      There is also a philosophy that putting a name behind something can put more power behind it. See Trump's book.

      In Trump's case, I think anything with his name on it cheapens it.

    6. Re:How much is it worth? by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Reiser may end up on death row because he was unable to raise enough funds to hire a good enough attorney.

      Some would say he might wind up on death row because he murdered his wife. Hard to say if that's true or not, but finding spatters of blood on his car and inside his home aren't really good signs.

      As far as defense, Riser has nowhere near the money to put up a brillant OJ style defense that can get you out of anything. Plus he's a white guy, so the race card won't play very well.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:How much is it worth? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      As far as defense, Riser has nowhere near the money to put up a brillant OJ style defense that can get you out of anything. Plus he's a white guy, so the race card won't play very well.

      Money can't buy you freedom. Look at Martha Stewart. Or Jeffrey Skilling. Or Andrew Luster. Or Alfred Taubman.

    8. Re:How much is it worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torvalds, you listening there?

      Linus tried to name Linux "Freex". The "Linux" name wasn't his idea, and he only went along with it after it became clear his choice wasn't going to be honored.

    9. Re:How much is it worth? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >Reiser may end up on death row

      California does not *have* death row.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:How much is it worth? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that it's named ReiserFS because in a past life somebody screwed him over and tried to steal his work. He felt that by naming it after himself, he'd protect himself from that kind of duplicity again. Yet here he is, losing his lifes work all over again ....

      Did he do it? Who can know these things. The gluttony of evidence here is almost suspicious in itself. Who really buys a book on how to commit murder, then doesn't chuck it after the deed is done? Especially somebody like Hans who is not stupid. If I was a cop this sort of thing would be ringing alarm bells in my head saying "setup".

    11. Re:How much is it worth? by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      California does not *have* death row.

            It'a just a temporary moratorium on executions, if thst's what you're thinking of. Scott Peterson is on death row.

        rd

  59. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    I think the GP employed something we know as "sarcasm".
    yeah....uh,

    I think the GP employed something we know as "sarcasm"
  60. Anedoctal evidence to the contrary... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    The only online contact with Hans Reiser I ever had suggested to me that he is a very reasonable person, albeit firm in his convictions, he did not attack me nor tried "ad hominis" or any other fallacies, and he actually changed his mind about the subject of our conversation, adopting the same position I had to start with.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  61. Apple will use ZFS by egghat · · Score: 1

    Not sure where Apple starts supporting it: in the server or the desktop version of Mac OS X. But the signs for ZFS support are clear.

    ZFS is vastly superior to ReiserFS 3/4, to ext2/3/4, to xfs, etc. It's fast, journalled, expandable on the fly, supports snapshots, checksums, redundancy, ... Among the few things that miss is builtin encryption, quotas (can be solved by "personal" filesystems) and online raid expansion. But in essence it's very cool. Most of the things that make TimeMachine look cool are built into ZFS. With the feature set of ZFS TimeMachine is not much more than a fancy GUI.

    Read more at wikipedia or here (How cool is that).

    Bye egghat

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  62. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I dont think thats a troll, MS cant produce software for shit, they either buy it (and modify it crappily to no end), or hire up developers of competeing products and have them re-invent it.

    MS failed to provide a file system, ReiserFS, however, is a reality, and can do prettymuch what MS advertised with WinFS. MS would be stupid not to take this opertunity to at least try to buy up a good file system, granted the first things they would to is remove compatibilty with it, so it would be totally propeitary, and no one could fork off the old GPLed sourced and be compatible with Windows or WinFS.

    I dont think anyone could deny that this is a golden opertunity for MS.

    Ironically, the hidden word is Plaque, god i hope MS dosent buy ReiserFS.

  63. Alternatively by GC · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "This is a good opportunity to own a filesystem and rename it after your own." Alternatively, this is a good opportunity to help fund the freedom of a possible murderer.
    1. Re:Alternatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      this is a good opportunity to help fund the freedom of a possible murderer.

      Not sure if you meant the "good" part in jest. But I hope not. A possible murderer is not a murderer. Not a criminal. And, thus, entitled to most freedoms.

    2. Re:Alternatively by GC · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's just from all the speculation and evidence that I would imagine that Hans Reiser is guilty and that Nina Reiser is likely to be wrapped in plastic bags, tied with masking tape to the front seat of a Honda car and dumped in some pretty deep water somewhere.

    3. Re:Alternatively by BokLM · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, this is a good opportunity to help fund the freedom of a possible murderer.

      Or to help fund the freedom of a possible innocent.

      Who knows ?

    4. Re:Alternatively by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, this is a good opportunity to help fund the freedom of a possible murderer.

      While it's sad to see that people don't want him to get a fair trial, your comment is insightful with regards to public opinion.

      Reiser should be offering up for sale the intellectual property assets of the company, not the company. This is probably tricky with an open-sourced product, but as long as the development team is on board and willing to "interview" for jobs at the new company and there's an understanding from both sides as to what's going on, the PR sell will be much easier.

      Yes, I realize this is shenanigans and a shell game.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Alternatively by tduff · · Score: 1
      "This is a good opportunity to own a filesystem and rename it after your own."

      Alternatively, this is a good opportunity to help fund the freedom of a possible murderer.

      Also alternatively this is a good opportunity to ensure that an American Citizen gets a fair trial.
  64. If he sells his company... by Sanity · · Score: 1

    ...I hope he uses the proceeds to hire a lawyer with more sense than to refer to potential buyers as "vultures" - what a moron.

  65. Maybe he can get $25,000 right away... by aok · · Score: 1
    From this article:

    A $25,000 reward is offered for information leading to the location of Nina Reiser. Police ask anyone with information to contact Oakland homicide investigators at (510) 238-3821 or a police tip line at (510) 637-0298.
    But he better get that reward claimed soon, because the investigators might read those books found in his car and find her body themselves:

    Also found inside the car...two books: "Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets," by David Simon, about the Baltimore police homicide squad, and "Masterpieces of Murder," by Jonathan Goodman, about notorious murder cases.
  66. who else might want to kill his exwife? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    Most people seem to think he is guilty but is he?

    The Evidence so far isn't that great, assuming you as a third party wanted to and indeed did kill his wife wouldn't you want someone else to take the blame and he is the most likely suspect?

    as the person with the body, you have the blood and can fill a syringe with it. you can buy the books the roll of bin liners and remove the seat- the assumption we are all making is that it was too blood stained to clean.

    would she have got in his car anyway?

    maybe the killing of his wife was to ruin him and his file system. Plenty of nutjobs here on slashdot, suppose one of them thought reiser had stolen his idea's what better revenge than this. Perhaps there are commercial reasons to want to bury reiserfs anyone still using it now? Linux users and developers won't use it now or defend gpl violations of reiserfs would they?

    Of course he could have been rather clever about it and added the books as an over the top addition to the crime scene to lend credibilty to the third party defence. Is there DNA evidence that he ever opened the books?

    It is not beyond believe that he could have manufactured evidence against himself to give credibility to this unknown third party defence.

    I remember a similar situation where a man deliberately let himself be seen with a knife a few hours before killing his girlfriends exhusband. It wasn't that knife that he used but he knew he would be a suspect and figured that his knife wouldnt match the wounds on the other guy, he was convicted anyway.

    How difficult is it to break into a honda? it isn't that difficult thats for sure.

    Have you any doubt in your mind now of his guilt?

    Perhaps a search of slashdot posts might reveal someone claiming reiser stole reiserfs, I don't know.

    of course if he is guilty, he should be convicted but this is why there is a trial.

    1. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Most people seem to think he is guilty but is he?"

      Most people are no better than the tabloids. They make up their minds in a nanosecond that someone is guilty based on heresay and 3rd hand reports of "evidence" then get all self righteous about it. Just because the average IQ on slashdot is above the mean doesn't mean that human nature on here is any different to anywhere else.

      Still , when did lack of information stop anyone on slashdot from pronouncing on The Truth.

    2. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      assuming you as a third party wanted to and indeed did kill his wife wouldn't you want someone else to take the blame and he is the most likely suspect?

      There was that guy who was apparently his business partner who had apparently started a relationship with Nina Reiser, but his name seems to have disapeared from the wikipedia article.

    3. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by blackest_k · · Score: 1
      do you mean Sean Sturgeon?

      apparently he loaned the company some money and wasn't paid back
      http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_256204954.h tml
      can't imagine he would be fond of either nina or hans. would make a good plot for a film but I'm sure this possibility would have been investigated.

      According to filings in Alameda County Superior Court, a notice of settlement was filed on Hans Reiser's behalf today to resolve a lawsuit filed against him by Sean Sturgeon on Dec. 30, 2004, seeking $131,552 in damages.

      The terms of the settlement weren't disclosed.

      Sturgeon claimed that Reiser and his company, Namesys, Inc., which he ran out of his home, failed to pay back a loan.

      In a response to the lawsuit that was filed on Feb. 15, 2005, Reiser, acting as his own attorney, said "under no theory of liability is defendant Reiser liable personally for repayment."

      Reiser alleged that Sturgeon "had been having a secret affair with defendant's wife, Nina Reiser, at the time of the loan." .
    4. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Plenty of nutjobs here on slashdot, suppose one of them thought reiser had stolen his idea's what better revenge than this.

      Darl ???? Is that you ????

    5. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Giloo · · Score: 1

      Hopefully will the jurors be 12 angry men!

    6. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because the average IQ on slashdot is above the mean doesn't mean that human nature on here is any different to anywhere else.

      That's news. Average IQ on slashdot above the mean?

    7. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Teancum · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a very close and personal friend of the Reiser family (I actually know Hans' father better than Hans himself, but that is besides the point), I find this whole episode showing the absolute worst in humanity on almost every level.

      This whole idea of speculating over his innocence or guilt is making me practically throw up each time I see news items here on /. related to this issue. If you have the investigation team equivalent of a D.A. that is going through this with a fine tooth comb, you might be able to intelligently make your own semi-accurate conclusions as to his guilt. For the rest of us, perhaps if we follow this very, very closely, we might be able to see the actual evidence that is presented to the court and make a judgement similar to a jury member.

      If you are relying upon what you are reading or hearing from the popular press (even /. in this case) about what has happened, you are relying on deliberate misinformation and partial facts to come to a conclusion. Hardly the best way to come to any sort of judgement.

      For myself, I see a very dear and personal friend who is going through a living nightmare in one way or another. A family that is litterally being ripped apart and a couple of kids that through no actions of their own are going to be permanently scarred emotionally over what the judicial system is doing to their family... even their extended family.

      This is also in a small way economically affecting me personally, and I wish I had more money to send and help Hans out so he wouldn't have to go through this very drastic step.

      At the same time, regardless of what happens, Hans' life in a sense is over and he is beginning something completely new from scratch. By selling the company he is also suggesting that perhaps it is time to move on with some other completely new project or even lifestyle.

      I pray for the day that Hans will no longer be a major news item on /. especially in this context.

    8. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your points are all valid sir. And there is definitely a rush to judgement. People should wait for more info - the cops and the media are not unbiased sources.

      OTOH, you are READING SLASHDOT. Assumedly, if you are a regular reader (and if you are not here's the scoop), you know
      that SLASHDOT is filled with uninformed, kneejerk reactions in general (and some informed ones too). And media in general is sensationalistic.

      So, you'd probably be best off avoiding reading articles about Hans Reiser until the trial concludes (if it occurs).

      Now, the topic of the future of ReiserFS and the value of the sale IS a valid topic.

      FWIW I agree with the naysayers that say an FS named after the lead developer (who fairly or not is being currently charged with murder) doesn't have a lot of market value.

    9. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by BendingSpoons · · Score: 1

      A family that is litterally being ripped apart and a couple of kids that through no actions of their own are going to be permanently scarred emotionally over what the judicial system is doing to their family... Huh? The kids are psychologically damaged, not by their mother's murder - possibly commited by their father - but by the criminal prosecution of the suspected murderer? I don't follow. This is also in a small way economically affecting me personally I've got to say, you really ran your plea for sympathy off the road with that one. "The man might be innocent.. his family's being torn apart.. and I'm losing money!"

      --
      For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
    10. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by apanloco · · Score: 1

      What about a fund-raising campaign to help him out?

    11. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well regardless of Hans innocence or guilt let him know I'm praying for him. No I'm not very religious at all but it's all I can do for a fellow in the geek community. I do understand terrible situations situations in life and just how hard it can be to be a human being and deal with life that can be coldly immoral all to often. Something Slashdoters tend not to reflect on in their world of self imposed illusions. They joke because they deny the truth. Ultimately the truth once faced can be liberating but maybe not in the ways we expect. Best wishes.

    12. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Don't lay a guilt trip on Slashdot. People speculate about all kinds of stuff they don't have all the facts on (tell me, did you ever discuss the OJ case?). It's a tragedy, but it's geek news and a topic for discussion. Just because your personally affected by it means nothing for everybody else.

    13. Re:who else might want to kill his exwife? by Teancum · · Score: 1
      The psychological scarring I'm refering to is the near constant shifting between families in the foster care system, where the kids are being torn apart by three grandparents (I don't think the maternal grandfather is involved right now) all trying to get a piece of the action. Hans' parents got a divorce more than two decades ago, and that is hardly a trivial thing at the moment to deal with, adding extra problems given the current context of what is going on.

      I've been through the judicial meat grinder myself, and it is not a pretty thing to behold, where you are guilty until proven innocent in a court of law, judicial BS not withstanding. Your comments here prove that you have that same mentality as well, strongly considering that Hans has done the crime and claiming that destroying his kids is something he has intentionally done. Perhaps he did, but I'm willing to wait and see first. Knowing Hans like I do, and knowing a bit about Nina as well (outside of the news) I'm willing to give Hans the benefit of the doubt myself.

      I just don't know what happened. Period.

      I've got to say, you really ran your plea for sympathy off the road with that one. "The man might be innocent.. his family's being torn apart.. and I'm losing money!"


      I'm in a business relationship with Hans' father (Ramon) that was potentially to include Hans as well. Heck, if Hans gets out of this situation with an aquittal, I may end up trying to form a stronger business partnership with Hans as well on his next venture.

      Just trying to deal with going back and forth from his home in Mississippi to California (as retired military he sometimes gets military transport... but that is only occasionally) Ramon spends so much money and time on trying to deal with his son that he can't really be productive doing anything else at the moment, not to mention dealing with his current family and younger children who also need attention.

      I'll also say that you have absolutely no idea what is involved here, and none of this is very pleasant. It isn't like Hans is some dot-com multi-millionaire with money in the bank just burning a hole trying to go somewhere. While he has certainly had some comfortable salaries in the past and was CEO of his own company, much of that was something he self-financed with employment elsewhere. Namesys has hardly been a resounding financially success story even though he has been able to land a few fairly decent contracts over the past few years, making a modest profit. All that more remarkable that he has done that with FOSS software, something that many readers here on /. fail to figure out how to accomplish.
  67. Or... by Dion · · Score: 1

    I was going to suggest 0xDEADBEEF, but this is better.

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
  68. Re:WinFS by stirbu · · Score: 1

    Hey, what about GatesFS? Don't blame me if he does that.

    --
    :wq
  69. Well something we certainly know by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Is that many book and computer smart people are rather stupid when it comes to street smarts. Slashdot demonstrates that on a daily basis. Just because you have a high IQ/SAT scores doesn't mean you are very good at dealing with real world tasks, hence the stereotypical geek that has no social skills, can't cook, etc, etc. Also being smart can sometimes be a detriment because it leads to what I like to call Smartest Motherfucker in the Universe Syndrome. Many smart people are so used to being smarter than people they deal with on a general basis they start to get an ego about it. This leads to a general state of thinking that they are essentially smarter than almost anyone, that they have the answer for everything. Thus they believe if they have a solution to something, the solution is without flaw and they don't objectively evaluate it.

    I haven't followed the case at all because frankly I just don't care, but this idea that "Oh he's a smart guy so he wouldn't have screwed up," is hopelessly naive. Even smart people make mistakes and especially many book smart people tend not to think real life things through.

    1. Re:Well something we certainly know by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      I think you're right on the money. Reiser did have a reputation for having quite an ego, and probably a rather bad temper. Throw in a wife that possibly wanted to split and take the kids with her (what with all the time he was spending on his company) and it's not a huge stretch to see that he's guilty.

      If I was Theo de Raadt's wife I'd think twice about installing linux or Windows on their home computers ;)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    2. Re:Well something we certainly know by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      Na, it's the NetBSD that de Raadt's wife should avoid like a plague.

  70. Sure, happens all the time by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    If a body was required for murder, well hell it'd be rather easy to get away with murder wouldn't it? Just make sure the body was disposed of in a way such that it could be found and you'd never have to worry.

    It's called a circumstantial case and while it's the weakest kind and not what the prosecution likes bringing, it can be successfully made. Basically you show that all the circumstances point to murder, and that there's not a reasonable alternate explanation.

    Same kind of case they tried, and failed, to make against OJ Simpson.

    It's actually more common than you'd think. Usually, in a case with direct evidence it never goes to trial. If the prosecution has the body, the bullet from it, the gun, and your fingerprints on the gun you almost certainly aren't getting out of that. However if the evidence is circumstantial, well then all you've got to do is convince one person in twelve that it is reasonable to doubt that you did it and you aren't going to jail.

    1. Re:Sure, happens all the time by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Of course with OJ Simpson the LAPD had a body... and some grusome photos to show that she had in fact been murdered. That wasn't even a contested fact with the Simpson trial.

      While there are some really bizzare details with this situation, not to mention Hans sometimes having foot-in-mouth disease (by his own admission!), it is really hard to try and come to a conclusion here.

      If Nina showed up in Moscow somehow, it would be very interesting to see what would happen next.

  71. Re:Mod system failure by PenGun · · Score: 1

    One who cares what you think to mod it down one. Yesss a useful system

  72. and about the car ... by manuel.flury · · Score: 1

    Does he sell his car too ? How much kilometers ?

  73. Re:WinFS by 1karmik1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm OT as hell but.. "opportunity", goddammit!

    Besides the grammar problems.. i use reiser 3.6 as my home partition's filesystem and although i'm not a power user
    (i didn't nor i have investigated how to tweak the filesystem to squeeze the most out of it) i haven't any problem with it.

    I don't think MS would be a good buyer for this technology (and as stated in some other comments, MS tend to prefer *stealing* the technology instead of buying it) both because they already have a fairly decent one (ntfs is _closed source_ but not _bad_) and because its PR like to let people think that they own the technology they sell, they always have and always will (i may be the average ignorant guy but i never heard of the companies that originally developed hyper terminal or MS anti-spyware before MS bought those).

    My 0.2$

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
  74. Re:WinFS by fbjon · · Score: 1

    I think the GP employed something we know as "whooosh".

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  75. 0xBADTASTE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    If ReiserFS uses a magic value somewhere, I suggest it to be changed to 0xDEADBABE.

    You and the people who modded that comment up just took bad taste to a new low....

  76. He didnt ditch the car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he had the body in the car, then why didnt he ditch it?

  77. Re:I've got the best naming ideas... by rolandog · · Score: 1

    You forgot TubGirlFS

  78. It's a setup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is someting very strange about this indeed.

    There is something not right about this.

    It fits a pattern of things 'not right' that have ben happening for some time.

  79. Summary: by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    It is sad that only people with lots of money stand a decent chance of walking away free, either innocent or guilty. What a retarded justice system of yours.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
    1. Re:Summary: by jadavis · · Score: 1

      only people with lots of money stand a decent chance of walking away free, either innocent or guilty.

      Source?

      In the U.S. system, there are many checks before someone is even charged with a capital crime. In other words, by the time you're charged, they already have a lot of evidence against you. It's no surprise that most of those people are found guilty at trial. The alternative is to drag every suspect through an expensive trial, and that makes no sense (but would result in many acquittals, which seems to be your goal).

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    2. Re:Summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been put on death row based on being picked out of a line up and no other evidence. These people have always been poor blacks.

    3. Re:Summary: by jadavis · · Score: 1

      That doesn't back up the statement at all that "only people with money have a decent chance of walking away free".

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
  80. Jury selection... by gamer4Life · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if one of the questions will be, "What operating system do you use?"

  81. Ehm... Does this mean there won't be any updates? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Hmm, a year or so ago at an old employer I implemented a 2TB fileserver using ReiserFS.. Whoops...

    --
    Deleted
  82. Vultures? by AlHunt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Reisers attorney, according to TFA:

    >'This is a unique opportunity for someone to buy the company for pennies on the dollar. We welcome all vultures.

    "vultures"? Funny words from the vulture bleeding him in the first place.

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    1. Re:Vultures? by Xochil · · Score: 1

      Seems like he's probably the one who started the bloodletting.

  83. 3735927486 by mangu · · Score: 1

    0xBADTASTE is not a valid hexadecimal value, 0xDEADBABE is valid, it's 3735927486 in decimal.

    1. Re:3735927486 by cortana · · Score: 1

      It's a valid hexatridecimal (base 36) number!

    2. Re:3735927486 by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      Then wouldn't it be 0xxxBADTASTE ?

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:3735927486 by pipatron · · Score: 1

      No, 0xBAD7A57E

      HTH.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    4. Re:3735927486 by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      0xBADTASTE is not a valid hexadecimal value

      No problem. You just have to B1ff it up a bit: 0xBAD7A57E

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    5. Re:3735927486 by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      I was refering to the sibling who wrote "It's a valid hexatridecimal (base 36) number!", I just clicked the wrong reply to.

      --
      I write code.
  84. Re:I've got the best naming ideas... by fred_kroft · · Score: 1

    Maybe Cowboy Neal should buy it. Then we could called it
    Fat Wookie FS

  85. Not Surprising Really by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    Defending yourself in court is expensive, and I think the government depends on this fact to convict many of the cases they try. And God help you if you are depending on a public defense attorney in a captial murder charge.

    Some people complain that rich people are treated differently under the law, but I suspect that what really happens is that they are rich enough to make the system work like it should.

    1. Re:Not Surprising Really by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the rest of the U.S., but here in Virginia, only lawyers with experience in capital murder cases, are assigned to defend indigents who are charged with a capital crime. These lawyers are very good.

  86. Make a paypal account by alonso · · Score: 1

    And I will send you my 50 euro!
    I hope a lot of people will do.
    Make it NOW!|

  87. Change your lawyer by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1
    DuBois added, 'This is a unique opportunity for someone to buy the company for pennies on the dollar. We welcome all vultures.'
    If your lawyer does this good a job of talking up the value of your company, it's time to hire a new lawyer. That's if you ignore the generally unprofessional phrasing.
    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Change your lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if the Vulture in chief welcomes other vultures, it just means that it stinks so badly he won't touch it himself.

  88. is it to late for... by non · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First Post File System?

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
  89. Then why... by Blappo · · Score: 1

    When sentencing convicted felons, does the judge give them X amount of fines and X amount of felony court costs.

    I'm not disagreeing (well, yes i guess I am) but I KNOW I've seen it done, in virtually every case where there was a conviction.

    I'm pretty certain you're wrong about this one.

    --
    Why are so many posts with factual errors modded up?
    1. Re:Then why... by jnik · · Score: 1

      Court costs (in this context) == the judge's salary, the lights for the building, etc. Not the payment for the prosecuting attorney.

    2. Re:Then why... by Blappo · · Score: 1

      No, in this context it's the cost of prosecuting someone, which I'm certain does include a portion of the cost for the prosecuting attorney.

      What you said makes no sense.

      --
      Why are so many posts with factual errors modded up?
  90. Evidence left everywhere.... by Ober · · Score: 0

    Is this due to lazy journaling?
    Or was he just waiting for GarbageCollection() to kick in?

  91. Re:WinFS by arth1 · · Score: 1
    MS failed to provide a file system, ReiserFS, however, is a reality, and can do prettymuch what MS advertised with WinFS. MS would be stupid not to take this opertunity to at least try to buy up a good file system, granted the first things they would to is remove compatibilty with it, so it would be totally propeitary, and no one could fork off the old GPLed sourced and be compatible with Windows or WinFS.

    I dont think anyone could deny that this is a golden opertunity for MS.

    I can, and I will. It would be disastrously negative PR to economically "support" a known suspected murderer.

    I also note why this is done: Not to, if possible, support the jobs of the low wage Russians who worked for Namesys, but to support Hans Reiser's legal costs.

    Merry Yuletide,
    --
    *Art
  92. Murder HOW-TO?l by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if he could claim it was just part of his current research activities into writing a HOW-TO for a successful murder?

    Sure, there might be books, but what good are they to geeks? We need HOW-TOs :-)

  93. Don't think so by Morosoph · · Score: 1

    Making downmods cost will just result in a crappy system similar to the US justice system - those with the most mod points will always 'win' With new mod points trickling in, there should be no problem. Also, the down-modders are going to have to earn those points back (both sides lose a point). Even with a high-karma-generating sock-puppet, it'll have to generate a lot of useful posts to keep the trolls in Karma.
    1. Re:Don't think so by yada21 · · Score: 1

      The problem with fiat modpoints is that the government can print as many of them as they like. The only sustainable way to reward good posts is with gold. I don't know what to do about bad ones - polonium is probably the answer.

      I'm a venture capitalist, you know... Microsoft, Ford - I helped start those.

      --
      I will have a sig when the market demands it.
  94. Re:WinFS by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1
    If you mean Windows should drop NTFS, purchase this, rebrand it and have it ready for Vista's release, than i think you're either trolling or a little naive.
    He might be naive for thinking that they will. But in thinking that they should, he's right. Because let's face it, NTFS sucks.
    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  95. Re:WinFS by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I seriously think MS should support more than 1 filesystem (FAT32 is dieing). This 1 filesystem to rule them all business is terrible. Linux has not trouble offering tons of file systems that are supported. I see no reason why windows couldn't support at least 3 or 4. The fact that windows is used everywhere from the home desktop right up to the enterprise servers means that using a single file system just doesn't make sense.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  96. Rename it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "own a filesystem and rename it after your own"

    "The Annoymous Coward Filesystem" just doesn't have that ring to it.

  97. Re:WinFS by DuckDodgers · · Score: 4, Informative

    ReiserFS, however, is a reality, and can do prettymuch what MS advertised with WinFS.

    The whole point of WinFS is to extend the data orginization indexing and searching advantages of relational databases to your filesystem.

    ReiserFS is a great journaling filesystem, but I don't believe it has anything to do with the concepts behind WinFS. I don't know how NTFS journaling compares to ReiserFS journaling, but NTFS does have journaling already.

  98. Well... by theworldisflat · · Score: 1

    I'd call it FUMS.

  99. Re:WinFS by zerocool^ · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Dude, welcome to linux. Windows has One File System(tm) because... it's easier. Linux has 129 filesystems because 129 different people think each one is the best at what it does.

    I love linux, but sometimes too much choice is a bad thing. If linux was a car, there'd be 18 steering wheels and no air conditioning, but you'd be able to change the radio stations from the hubcaps.

    --
    sig?
  100. Re:WinFS by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Huh??? I hate Microsoft and even I find that suggestion to be hollow. ReiserFS offers NOTHING that MS claimed WinFS would offer. Most specifically it isn't a DB backed file system as WinFS was supposed to be. ReiserFS also doesn't employ any method of storing metadata as MS promised WinFS would. Imagine not needing to use file extensions or know what sort of data is in a file... the file system would take care of that for you and automatically handle associations with applications without messy kludges like file extensions or MIME types. That's what MS promised and what they couldn't deliver. ReiserFS doesn't offer any of that either. It just offers a really high performance potentially 64-bit journalling FS with fast transaction replay. That's it.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  101. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right, Linux shouldn't be supporting all those silly filesystems such as vfat hfs+ etc. Who do those windows and mac users think they are that they need to be able to get to their files from linux? Weirdos.

    (note for the 'woosh' victims: sarcasm intentionally)

  102. What I'd like to see by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be cool if some sensible developers could get the money together, buy the company and Reiser4, and work with the kernel devs to get it made part of Linux.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  103. GoogleFS? by brain1 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm taking bets... 10 to 1 Google buys it.
    -dh

    1. Re:GoogleFS? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1
      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  104. Re:WinFS by gotem · · Score: 1

    No, just put Opus Dei guys as the murderers and you have a best seller

  105. Alan Cox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  106. No, lawyers only 'fork' you by Marbleless · · Score: 1

    I think that is how it is pronounced ;)

    --
    --I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
  107. C'mon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How stupid do they think we are?

    Wouldn't be better to throw a letter titled "How I killed my wife" inside?

  108. could be a typo... could be CRV by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

    So instead of 15 year old car, he could be driving their small SUV, called Honda CRV.

  109. Re:WinFS by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    You mean like NTFS?

    Microsoft initially supported FAT16, then FAT32 in the 9x/ME series from 98 onwards. NT/2000/XP/Vista default to NTFS but have had the option for FAT16 or FAT32 partitions.

    Now I've got that minor issue out of the way, for most home users what difference does having 3 filesystems make? For servers NTFS is solid (No, really) and if you absolutely need your server to do something which relies on a different filesystem, or even has the option to use one to gain a tiny performance increase, you won't be running Windows Server anyway.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  110. Re:WinFS by AnyThingButWindows · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Linux was a car.... You could open the hood, and change motor to what you like. You could change the steering wheel, and the pedals, and the seats, and the hood color.... etc... The windows wouldn't be electric so you know the hand crank would work every time, and not hang. The car would cost $20k and last 400k miles. It would work on any road. You would never have an accident.
    Oh wait, that is a normal car....

    If Windows was a car.... Your hood would be welded shut, and you couldn't work on the motor, much less change it out, the windows wouldn't work on voice command, but you could have the option of "Are you sure" before you roll up, or down the windows with a button. The Airbag would ask the same question as well. Your car would cost $300,000 and the motor would last 10k miles before you had to wipe it and reload the engine. Only the dealer could do this, and it would take 36 minutes, but would require a preliminary inspection that required the car to be flipped upside down, and the blue ray disk inserted. You would have to buy a new one to be compatible with the new roads every 5 years.

    If MacOS were a car, you could do most of 1, but you would have to replace your car once every 2 years, but if you choose not to, then your radio stops working, but you will have the pleasure of knowing that although your car costs $50k, it will last 400k miles as well. (IE: A Volvo) Although you could get an extended warrenty for $2,390 a year called the AppleCar plan.

    --
    When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. - Jefferson
  111. You're missing the word "presumed" by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Question: what was the highest mountain in the world before Everest was discovered?

    Answer: Everest was the highest. We just didn't know it yet.

    People are not innocent before proven guilty. They are presumed innocent by the justice system until proven guilty. Before the proof, they may be guilty or innocent, and a trial doesn't change that. (In fact, trials never find anyone "innocent"; they only find people "not guilty", and the presumption of innocence does the rest.)

    One might think OJ was guilty, but the justice system must presume he was innocent because he was not legally proven guilty.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:You're missing the word "presumed" by bogado · · Score: 1

      You assume that guilt/non guilt is a black and white with no grays in between. There are several shades of gray that one person might classify as guilt (of something) while others would classify as non-guilty. What constitute a self-defense, does preemptive self-defense count? What about insanity, does temporary insanity count? There are many gray, and hopefully will aways have them, since human action and motivations are both impossible to measure in an non personal and scientific way.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

  112. Re:WinFS by Burz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Settle down there little doobie.

    ReiserFS 3.x supports extended attributes (metadata) and ReiserFS 4.x supports that in spades with all sorts of database-like possibilities.

    As for filesystems joining data with executables at the hip, all I have to say is it sounds a lot like OLE, ActiveX, etc. and I shudder to think how it might be abused.

  113. Bid? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    Is there an asking price? Or is this just "Best Offer"? The article doesn't mention anything about it.

    I actually think it would be cool for the employees to buy most of the shares themselves. Mr. Reiser would get some money for his defense from the sale of his shares, but maybe he could retain some percentage as an income stream from the dividends (or sell some to a trusted friend). That way he wouldn't be totally ousted from his company.

    I'm assuming that Namesys is incorporated, which I'm sure is a safe assumption.

    Just a thought.

  114. Silly hacker by billcopc · · Score: 2, Funny

    What was this guy thinking ? Is he BLIND ? Did he not realize that just about every brilliant hacker is single for a reason ?! Women, all women, are totally insane! There is ample empirical evidence that shows that only intellectually challenged men can endure extended female companionship.

    As young girls, they are taught that girls are smart and boys are stupid. See when a clever fella gets a woman, at first all is rosy, but over time the woman gets comfortable and that's where the power struggles begin. First the man will turn down alcohol and sex, favoring long nights of caffeine and code. This spites the woman, who retaliates by offering the same alcohol and sex to an ugly-ass close friend of the hacker. As the nonsense altercations grow in frequency, the clever male begins to apply his vast intellect to find a solution. Possessing above-average intellect, he starts to believe he can get away with murder, since he is far smarter than the common police detective. Woman is ground using a beowulf cluster of noisy Celeron CPU fans, then buried in the chassis of a nearby AS/400 mainframe. Hacker assumes he is home free.

    Cops show up, ask "Hey where's your wife". Hacker says "She's went to fuck my ugly-ass friend four weeks ago". Cops pool their collective IQ and ultimately decide something is amiss.

    All this crap could have been avoided if the hacker had ordered a replacement wife from Bride.ru. Then he could have said "My wife is right here, NOT dead in a mainframe and NOT fucking my ugly-ass friend". The cops would have celebrated this non-event with coffee and donuts and ReiserFS would live on as a crappy-ass attention-whoring unsupported agenda-driving filesystem.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  115. Re:WinFS by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    I was talking ReiserFS3 as 4 hasn't even made it into the kernel. In fact I believe Hans was rebuffed by Linus as the latter didn't think that ReiseFS4 was really ready yet especially considering some of the things that would need to be changed in the mainline kernel to support these things. From what I remember, Linus suggested that a lot of that functionality could be implemented in Fuse and didn't belong in kernel space. So in my mind ReiserFS4 is a non-entity. At least until it makes it into the mainline kernel.

    I notice you said, "database-like". That's not good enough. If we're talking WinFS (which was likely going to be based on MS SQL [shudder]) then to compete I want a DB that rides on MySQL or PostgreSQL or some kind of SQL db. It doesn't appear that ReiserFS4 is that at all. Having database-like qualities is not the same as actually being a DB based file system. If it's truly DB based you should be able to connect to the DB and issue SQL queries to work with file system objects at a low level (metadata, permissions, owner, group, extents, etc...). One thing I wish someone would do in kernel space file systems that I think is a HUGE ommision is a versioning feature like OpenVMS has. I know that Emacs can be configured to do that, but I think all files on the filesystem should have versions with a limit that you set (ie. keep the last five revisions, or keep multiple versions of files for a week, etc...). Again, if it was a DB backed file system, this would be totally possible and very likely easy to implement. I don't think something like ReiserFS4 could do that.

    Don't misunderstand me, I use ResierFS3 when I need performance and I like it a whole lot more than ext3. But it's not what WinFS promised and ResierFS4 likely isn't either.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  116. IfIDidItFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not buy the company and change it to the "IfIDidItFS". You could have it spit out error codes like "I don't know if Hans did it, but I'd understand. (0x000ad322)"

  117. Re:new here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    He can't be new here, he misspelled "lose" and put it in caps.

  118. Re:Clueless by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    What self-respecting geek has bookends?
    The proper care and feeding of reading (Hey! That rhymes) material is stacked on a nearby flat surface in reverse chronological sequence of acquisition.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  119. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you are right. Aside from FAT, FAT32, NTFS, CDFS, and UDFS, Windows is sorely lacking for on-disk storage formats. Plus, MS only supports SMB, NFS, and WebDAV as network filesystems.

    MS really needs to start adding support for filesystems that only 1% of their users will have ever heard of as a means to increase choice and decrease reliability.

    I currently have 15 filesystem drivers installed on my XP system, and I don't even have NFS installed.

    dom

  120. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's because different filesystems are better suited for different tasks. One size does *not* fit all - that's an incredibly narrow-minded (and uneducated) statement. For example, if I was running a webserver with tons of tiny little web pages and scripts, it makes more sense to use ReiserFS than, say, ext3. Besides, why would I want air conditioning if I could put the Windows down (pun intended) and get fresh air without the AC sucking up gas mileage?

  121. MOD PARENT UP by Ivan+Matveich · · Score: 1

    My friend, you are a genius.

  122. We all are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a possible murderer.

    You, the poster of the misfortuned parent comment, is too a possible murderer.

    Hans' wife (is she alive and laughing now?) is/was a possible murderer.

  123. Beware: tasteless reply by tgv · · Score: 0, Troll

    It was tasteless, we agree. But why mod it funny? Please, enlighten me.

  124. Re:WinFS by swillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Linux has 129 filesystems because 129 different people think each one is the best at what it does.

    No, Linux has several file systems because there's no such thing as a perfect file system, and even if there were, it hasn't been achieved yet.

    Each of the file systems out there has different strengths and weaknesses. If you need maximum reliability, you need a fully journaled file system (data and metadata), but you pay for that reliability in terms of performance. In most cases, you don't need that, but it is important that your file system not become corrupted by a power failure, or similar problem. For those, metadata journaling is enough. In yet other cases, raw speed is the goal, so journaling is a bad idea.

    But speed vs. reliability is only one issue to consider. Another is space efficiency, particularly for systems that will have large numbers of small files. Most file systems use one disk block (e.g. 1KB) even for a 100-byte file. Others (like reiserfs) can pack small files together. But that efficiency introduces complexity, which can reduce reliability. So space efficiency vs. reliability is a consideration.

    Another tradeoff is read performance vs. write performance. Yet another is performance of small files vs performance of large files. Yet another is reconfigurability -- can file systems be grown or shrunk in-place, perhaps even while in use? That's another tradeoff against complexity and the associated reduced reliability.

    For the desktop user, it doesn't really matter. You'll notice little difference regardless of which file system you choose. But there are applications in which the choice of file system can make a significant difference in system performance, space efficiency, reliability, or flexibility.

    Windows has One File System(tm) because... it's easier.

    No, Windows has one file system because Microsoft has never focused on technical excellence. Mediocrity is often an excellent business strategy, and it has certainly proven to be good to Microsoft, but that doesn't mean we can't have better.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  125. Re:Mod system failure by tgv · · Score: 1

    What's that suppose to mean?

  126. Re:WinFS by certain+death · · Score: 0

    Why on Whoever's green earth would you mod some fucking moron who does not even know that NTFS is available as +5 Interesting?!? You need to go back to fucking "How to read and Mod" school!!

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
  127. Re:WinFS by TheSolomon · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you're right. FAT32 is dying. That's why XP and newer essentially defaults to (or at least strongly recommends) NTFS. (The 2GB file size limit with FAT32 is one of the many reasons for this.)

    If you're going to fault Microsoft for backing an dying format, at least pick the one they're currently using. ;-) It'd be like chiding them for FAT16... which is actually dead to my knowledge.

  128. Yeah but only a handful of them are right by davidwr · · Score: 1

    "Linux has 129 filesystems because 129 different people think each one is the best at what it does."

    Yeah but only a relative handful of those 129 are right for 99.99% of the users out there. Let's count: For booting uncompressed hard drives, there are ext2/3, vfat-and-friends, rieserfs, and few others in common use, at least on the x86 platform. For compressed filesystems and optical drives there are a few others. For non-booting partitions add filesystems native to other OSes, such as filesystems commonly used by Windows, Mac, and various Unix flavors. That covers 99-99.9% of the people out there.

    Data-recovery specialists, people accessing legacy data, people running classic emulators, and curious hobbyists may need filesystems or at least data-access tools for older OSes. People running very-high-end or non-x86 equipment may need FSs to match the native OSes of those platforms. Embedded users may need a particularly space-efficient FS. That covers almost everyone else.

    You CAN get third-party support for other filesystems in Windows. If you pay MS a chunk of change, you can even write your own FS. It's just that it's difficult or impossible to get Windows to boot from any FS not supported my Microsoft, e.g. FAT/FAT32, NTFS, or standard CD/DVD filesystems.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  129. Re:WinFS by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm not saying windows is smart having a one size fits all OS. I'm saying that their file system is "good enough" for most of the things windows does. Not to mention, it makes it hella easy to work on windows machines when you're pulling and swapping hard drives. They're phasing out the old crappy (fat), standardizing on the current (ntfs), and (in theory) looking forward (winFS).

    Yes, sometimes file system types can make a performance difference. Using ReiserFS is going to help out when you're doing stuff with lots of little files, yes. How much? I dunno. Will most people be happy with ext3? Yes, absolutely. ext3 will do pretty much everything you need it to do. However, when you choose a filesystem type in the fdisk menu on linux, there are literally this many:

    Command (m for help): l
     
      0 Empty 1e Hidden W95 FAT1 80 Old Minix be Solaris boot
      1 FAT12 24 NEC DOS 81 Minix / old Lin bf Solaris
      2 XENIX root 39 Plan 9 82 Linux swap / So c1 DRDOS/sec (FAT-
      3 XENIX usr 3c PartitionMagic 83 Linux c4 DRDOS/sec (FAT-
      4 FAT16 <32M 40 Venix 80286 84 OS/2 hidden C: c6 DRDOS/sec (FAT-
      5 Extended 41 PPC PReP Boot 85 Linux extended c7 Syrinx
      6 FAT16 42 SFS 86 NTFS volume set da Non-FS data
      7 HPFS/NTFS 4d QNX4.x 87 NTFS volume set db CP/M / CTOS / .
      8 AIX 4e QNX4.x 2nd part 88 Linux plaintext de Dell Utility
      9 AIX bootable 4f QNX4.x 3rd part 8e Linux LVM df BootIt
      a OS/2 Boot Manag 50 OnTrack DM 93 Amoeba e1 DOS access
      b W95 FAT32 51 OnTrack DM6 Aux 94 Amoeba BBT e3 DOS R/O
      c W95 FAT32 (LBA) 52 CP/M 9f BSD/OS e4 SpeedStor
      e W95 FAT16 (LBA) 53 OnTrack DM6 Aux a0 IBM Thinkpad hi eb BeOS fs
      f W95 Ext'd (LBA) 54 OnTrackDM6 a5 FreeBSD ee EFI GPT
    10 OPUS 55 EZ-Drive a6 OpenBSD ef EFI (FAT-12/16/
    11 Hidden FAT12 56 Golden Bow a7 NeXTSTEP f0 Linux/PA-RISC b
    12 Compaq diagnost 5c Priam Edisk a8 Darwin UFS f1 SpeedStor
    14 Hidden FAT16 <3 61 SpeedStor a9 NetBSD f4 SpeedStor
    16 Hidden FAT16 63 GNU HURD or Sys ab Darwin boot f2 DOS secondary
    17 Hidden HPFS/NTF 64 Novell Netware b7 BSDI fs fd Linux raid auto
    18 AST SmartSleep 65 Novell Netware b8 BSDI swap fe LANstep
    1b Hidden W95 FAT3 70 DiskSecure Mult bb Boot Wizard hid ff BBT
    1c Hidden W95 FAT3 75 PC/IX
    I'm not saying there aren't holes in my arguement, but... it's hard to deny that's a crapoload of filesystem types. Now, it's not Linux's fault (or GNU or whoever wrote fdisk) that there are that many options.

    But this is a symptom of a greater problem in Linux - it's desire to be every thing to every one. And not in a "get on my bandwagon or get the fuck out" type scenario, like you have with Windows - but a location for everyone to dump any pet project that they have ever made, and eventually we have 43 window managers, 2 Xservers, 18 mail dameons, 97 web browsers, 9 different sets of wireless networking tools (none of which work for more than 3 chipsets), 812 shells, 14 IM clients, 84 Mp3 players, and four office suites. Boy, if you like choice, linux is the place to be. But, some of us find it a bit overwhelming at times (mainly, when "some of us" have to do desktop support for linux).

    I can't help but wonder if all the people who are working on different, paralell projects pooled their efforts where Linux would be today.

    And as I've been saying for 4 or 5 years now on Slashdot, all I ever wanted out of linux was a universal clipboard with a universal API for cutting and pasting. We now have windows that wobble with hardware accelerated graphics (FC6). Great. I'd like to be able to cut and paste.

    ~Wx
    --
    sig?
  130. Windows Supports more then one file system by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    Why has nobody pointed out that Windows supports more then one files system? Sure NTFS is the standard and then who the hell knows what they did to it in Vista but Windows also reads FAT32 and FAT16 file systems. In fact almost all external hard drives are formated and partitioned on FAT32.

    1. Re:Windows Supports more then one file system by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      ISTR that Windows has actually supported foreign file systems since around Win98. At least, there's supposed to be an external file system layer, and some skeleton code in MSDN. However, the fact that nobody's written an extfs driver suggests to me that either it's too Windows-oriented, or the support is incomplete.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    2. Re:Windows Supports more then one file system by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      It sure does read FAT 32 and FAT16, but it's why I stated that FAT32 is dying. As far as I'm concerned the only one they truly support is NTFS. The fdisk utility included can't make FAT32 partitions above 32? GB, even though FAT 32 supports up to 8 TiB. Microsoft intentionally cripples FAT32, so that more people will use NTFS. Mandatory Wikipedia link. So, while windows does support FAT32, it's becoming less and less prominent (except on thumb drives and cameras) because MS limits the size of the volume to 32 GB.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Windows Supports more then one file system by rrkap · · Score: 1

      However, the fact that nobody's written an extfs driver suggests to me that either it's too Windows-oriented, or the support is incomplete.

      They have, see http://www.fs-driver.org/. I seriously considered using it for an external drive that is usually connected to my Linux file server, but that I sometimes use with my laptop when I need to copy a couple hundred gigs of data from another location. However, I ended up choosing FAT-32 because I can connect it to just about any computer and be fairly sure of it working.

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    4. Re:Windows Supports more then one file system by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "The fdisk utility included can't make FAT32 partitions above 32 GB"

      Does anybody still use fdisk? When there are a gazillion partition managers around, free and otherwise, for both Windows and Linux?

      If Microsoft really wanted to get rid of FAT32, they'd just cut off support for it entirely. But as long as they don't support booting from external USB storage, and as long as USB storage devices need FAT file systems, Microsoft is stuck with FAT32.

      Also, as you correctly noted, FAT32 does support large volumes. I have 40GB and 60GB FAT32 partitions on my system. I use FAT32 for my data solely to allow both Linux and Windows to access my data, without worrying about half-baked Linux NTFS drivers (even the latest apparently will refuse to write to NTFS up top 50% of the time - it won't damage your NTFS but why the hell would I use a driver that refuses to work half the time?).

      I really should look into the Windows EXT2/3 Installable File System mentioned above. If it's TRULY reliable, I could dispense with FAT32 and use EXT3 for all my data. I already have a couple utilities that can be used to examine EXT file systems from Windows, but having a full EXT2/3 file system installed would be much better - IF it is TRULY reliable.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  131. Re:WinFS by concept10 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love your comment. It's small and really to the point of the state of Linux and the community in general. I personally enjoy the GNU/Linux ecosystem but there are too many choices sometimes. It seems as if the trend is to start a new project/distro/fork whenever someone believes that they could make something better, faster, slimmer, etc... Don't get me wrong, I love the amount of choices but I would rather see more consolidation of efforts. Instead of making a new distro with minor changes/patches, contribute to a major one... etc... Sometimes it's as we are going in circles.

  132. Mod this up! by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

    No body has been found to date.

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  133. Re:WinFS by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Do you REMEMBER how many networking stacks were available for Windows before Windows95 came with TCP/IP?

    Do you KNOW how much shareware is available for Windows? How much crap-ware?

    The only benefit any of it has is having pretty WYSIWYG installers.

    -Chris

  134. Re:WinFS by SCO+STINKS · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pick any common English given name for the bad guy except Bill

    Ok great... I'll use Steve!

    --
    Reason #32767 not to use VB6: Integers are 2 bytes... Think about it!
  135. I wouldn't want to be compared to OJ by Dragon+Bait · · Score: 1
    I'm not saying he couln't have done it, but it's like the OJ case

    I'm pretty sure that if I was Reiser I wouldn't want my case to be compared to OJ's. OJ is pretty much taken as a wife murdered who got away with it. He would have been convicted if (1) he wasn't black, (2) he wasn't a celebrity, or (3) they had filed the case in Santa Monica versus L.A. (where due to Rodney King, no predominantly black jury would convicted him).

    Nobody gets BANNED from law enforcement for deliberately screwing up the trial!

    Again, look at the cast of characters from the OJ trial. Most of the high profile cops were no longer on the force within 2 years. Marcia Clark is no longer with the D.A.'s office. A lot of careers were destroyed because of high profile incompetence. (Whereas with low profile incompetence they could have stayed on for years.)

    By the way, I like the theory of "the wife did it to frame him and she's really living it up south of the border" theory. Sounds like grasping at straws, but could muddy the waters enough for "reasonable doubt".

  136. Re:WinFS by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

    Linux does support a lot of file systems. About a third of them are for compatibility with other systems, a third are because the steering wheel from an 18-wheel semi-truck is hard to handle when mounted in a Honda, and the last third are research and development.

    That said, you do know there is a difference between a file system and a partition, right? Your list above from fdisk only shows partition types, not file systems. Linux uses two partition types, 82 (swap) and 83 (Linux). The majority of the rest are to maintain compatibility with Windows, OS/2, Sun, BSD, and other systems.

    The nice thing about GNU/Linux is that when someone tells you to "get on my bandwagon or get the fuck out", you can get out and still obtain the functionality you need. It's like having icing with your cake.

    --
    Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  137. Reiser defense fund? by Glomek · · Score: 1

    Why hasn't Hans started a defense fund and accepted donations?

    It worked for Zimmermann.

  138. Sad, isn't it? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Isn't it sad to live in a country whre you have to pay your lawyer in case you are accused of murder?

    What happends if his lawyer quits because he can't pay him anymore? Automatically guilty?

    angel'o'sphere

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Sad, isn't it? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Isn't it sad that you live in a country where you can't actually speak your mind.

    2. Re:Sad, isn't it? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I don't live in such a country, do you? Or what was your point?

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Sad, isn't it? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Go try to deny the Holocaust. If prison has the Internet tell me how well that freedom of speech thing works.

    4. Re:Sad, isn't it? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I still fail to see any relation to my original post and your answer to it.

      And I dont understand this post neither, wht is this supposed to mean: If prison has the Internet ... ??

      Regarding your comment about freedom of speach and holocaust denial ... grow up Mr. There are different levels of free speach, in every country, even in the US. While it might be free speach to say "The President is a Pedophile" you surely get a court case for insulting him and have to pay compensation ... becasue there are other high goods like the intangibility of the dignity of a human which is slightly higher hold than free speach per se.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  139. Re:WinFS by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    I seriously think MS should support more than 1 filesystem (FAT32 is dieing). I'm not sure if you're a troll or a moron, but...

    First of all, Windows supports more than one filesystem from Microsoft alone, those being FAT and NTFS. Second, adding support for other filesystems isn't hard; just like Linux all one has to do is install the software.

  140. I swear I've seen this movie... by natet · · Score: 1

    Antitrust anyone?

    --
    IANAL... But I play one on /.
  141. I doubt it will be by Willy+Wong · · Score: 1

    Jack Klugman (Quincy) is the only one still alive.

  142. Re:WinFS by Jeld · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is true, but only superficially. It is not like Linux "has" 129 filesystems, but it ***supports*** a lot of different file systems. So weather you want to access your NTFS windows partition or HFS MacOS disc you can do it. More or less every distribution out there will format your partitions as ext3 at install time by default. Windows on the other hand only supports two filesystems (not One File System) which are FAT32 and NTFS. So if I have a disk from my friend's iMac or linux box or solaris server or IRIX workstation or basically anything except windows, I will not be able to read it in windows whatever I do.

    --

    Everybody Lies. But it doesn't matter since nobody listens.

  143. Re:WinFS - XFS by milatchi · · Score: 0

    there's no such thing as a perfect file system
    XFS
    /me ducks!

    --
    Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  144. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Windows has One File System(tm) because... it's easier.
    > No, Windows has one file system because Microsoft has never focused on technical excellence.
    > Mediocrity is often an excellent business strategy, and it has certainly proven to be good to
    > Microsoft, but that doesn't mean we can't have better.

    Are you saying Mediocrity isn't easy? I've been busting my hump just trying to get by when there's an even easier way out? It hurts to find out you're not as lazy as you thought. But anyway...

    I thought windows had Fat16, Fat32 and NTFS for filesystems BTW? I bet multiple filesystems requiring different drivers in windows would cause some issues for all the non-computer-savvy users out there when switching disks and devices.

  145. KillerFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had the money.. I would buy it and call it KillerFS!

  146. Re:WinFS by darkpixel2k · · Score: 2, Funny

    heh, maybe Hans was in deals to sell it to MS (WinFS), but his concience ate away at him, and he ultimately refused. In return, they killed his wife, and now they get their FS on the CHEAP!


    How could you miss it. It's so *obvious*.
    Hans didn't kill his wife...STEVE BALLMER DID!

    omg--I said too muc**CHAIR!!**

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  147. Re:WinFS by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I can see Microsoft driving people to drink, but to murder? Suicide, most definitely.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  148. I know its not much by simontek2 · · Score: 1

    but I would give 2k for it, but thats all i have. if i was rich, i would give more. lol

    --
    SimonTek
  149. Re:WinFS by dark-nl · · Score: 1
    I can't help but wonder if all the people who are working on different, paralell projects pooled their efforts where Linux would be today.

    Same place as the HURD, I bet :)
    Having parallel projects makes it possible for the good ones to flourish and the bad ones to die off. If there's a single, unified project, and it gets stuck for any reason, then the whole movement is stuck.

  150. I bet he makes a killing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    (I'm here all week, etc.)

  151. Re:WinFS by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    Why not? Bill is writing crappy software.

    Oh, wait, he doesn't write software anymore - he just does charity work...uh, huh, that's it.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  152. Re:Ehm... Does this mean there won't be any update by convolvatron · · Score: 1

    you mean 'installed' or 'created'?

  153. Killing other people is a very sad, mad business, by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1
    But there are things about this whole horrible business which I find very disturbing. There are a number of questions which I feel should be asked.

    There has not been any report of Hans being seen by a psychiatrist. In California, does the prosecution not have to demonstrate that a person is not insane as part of the preliminary trial? There would seem to me to be ample evidence to indicate that the question should at least be asked. There is a difference between being left to rot in prison possibly on Death Row, effectively in solitary confinement, perhaps for decades, and being hospitalised in an institution for the criminally insane. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A304228

    On the surface, going from press reports on the 'Net about what has happened, there would appear to be sufficient motivation and opportunity for Hans to have been framed by a demonstrably vindictive ex-spouse. So far, and imho there has now been sufficient time to find her, a body has not been discovered. Has this possibility even been examined by the legal profession?

    Why is Hans having to find money? Does the State of California not have a legal aid fund? Although it is in direct contradiction of Magna Carta, upon which all Common Law is based, it would appear that Californian Justice is a commodity which is for sale!

    I could go on and on, but that's enough for now.

  154. Re:WinFS by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    maybe Hans was in deals to sell it to MS

    Sounds plausible. After all, Microsoft and ReiserFS have similar track records in the "reliability" category...

  155. Re:WinFS by jrobinson5 · · Score: 0

    Known suspected murder? Isn't that an oxymoron?

  156. Is the kettle calling the pot black? by tashammer · · Score: 0

    The lawyers are suggesting that someone may wish to buy Hans' business because the legal bills are too much and his lawyers are saying that whoever buys it would be a vulture? No doubt the lawyers are working the case pro bono NOT!

  157. response by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    The jury isn't the issue. The judge, who gets to choose what evidence in admissible, and who can throw out the case before it goes to trial, and who can throw out jury, and who can throw out the jury's decision, is the weak point when it comes to convicting someone politically powerful.

    Now judges have a certain degree of independence from the influence of the executive and legislative branch according to the constitution, but the legislative and executive branch are not *fond* of this independence (notice all of the whining about "activist judges" whenever a judge does something a politician doesn't like), but the other branches have had a long time to figure out ways around this. Ultimately, judges are either appointed or elected. If they are elected, then they need external money and political support. If they are appointed, then that gives the other branches an opportunity to hand pick people who are likely to take orders. Thankfully on the national level (when it's devided between dems and republicans) this doesn't happen as much, since the congress tends not to trust judges who are too cozy with the opposing party, and relatively independent people are liked best.

  158. Re:WinFS by WgT2 · · Score: 1

    the file system would take care of that for you and automatically handle associations with applications without messy kludges like file extensions or MIME types

    It exactly this kind of perspective that causes me to absolutely hate Microsoft products: the OS knows better than I do as to what I want to do with a file.

    Doesn't it stand to reason that if 'WinFS' was going to handle MIME data for me that it would also limit me as to what choice I would have concerning which program I could open a file with? Microsoft already loves to lock you into programs when it, at least currently, asks you which program you want use to open such-and-such file and then, by default, checks the 'Always use this program for this file type (blah-blah-blah)'. (Disclaimer: this is fine for convenience and it would seem to work better for the n00b, but what if the n00b is wrong about which file they choose and then don't know where to change the association, let alone don't know it called an 'association', etc. etc.?).

    Ultimately, I get really tired of WinXXX treating like a fool. So, to help combat it, I like to name my text files with no extension. I wonder how WinFS would efficiently handle that? What if I did that to my binary packet sniffs?

  159. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Windows has One File System(tm) because... it's easier.

    >No, Windows has one file system because ...

    FAT12, FAT16, FAT32, NTFS, CDFS, UDF, EFS.

    Windows has seven file systems because ...

  160. Re:WinFS by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


    *THAT*, sir, is an excellent point, and one that I hadn't thought of. I bow to your cynical-yet-probably-true powers of reasoning.

    Sigh, sometimes I wish I would never post on here.

    --
    sig?
  161. Re:WinFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >They're phasing out the old crappy (fat), standardizing on the current (ntfs), and (in theory) looking forward (winFS).

    Bearing in mind that WinFS was not a file-system. The acronym was "Windows Future Storage". The filesystem was still NTFS; WinFS added a database layer on top of it that added a few services. Think "Registry 2.0".

  162. Re:WinFS by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Well this is totally off topic but a while back I had an idea for the free/open source community to build a system based on DNS that would contain information about filetypes and applications that can handle them. This would be an open/free project that would have to run in a similar way to DNS and there would have to be a filetype resolver in the OS distribution that would query this name system when it encounters an application that doesn't have a current association. It could even be extended to work just like DNS, where organizations or home users who run servers at home (like me) could even hav e local versions that would contain custom entries that take precedence over the "root servers". The main idea being that when someone attempts to open a non-associated filetype, they would get a prompt that would list the applications known to handle the filetype with links (where possible) to install the application from the net using any of the popular package managers if the app isn't present. Mainly this is in an effort to make the distros easier to use for non-technical people or... technical folks who are lazy and don't want to bother with downloading or associating the apps themselves (they exist although I'm not one of them). Anyway, your comment made me think about this again...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  163. Re:WinFS by swillden · · Score: 1

    FAT12, FAT16, FAT32, NTFS, CDFS, UDF, EFS. Windows has seven file systems because ...

    First, EFS isn't a file system, it's a feature of NTFS. CDFS and UDF are file systems, but they're only supported by Windows because they're a standard established by others. Microsoft's (past) support for HPFS falls into the same category. Further, I'd exclude them from the count because they're special-purpose file systems. You can't use them on your hard drive for example (unlike Linux, where you could use CDFS or UDF on a disk partition, though you wouldn't really want to).

    As for FAT12, FAT16, and FAT32, those are all essentially the same file system, with small, incremental improvements to work around severe limitations in the earlier versions.

    What does that leave? Windows has two file systems: FAT and NTFS. The file system they started with, and patched a few times as its weaknesses became unbearable, and the new file system they created for NT, and onto which they've grafted a few additional features (e.g. EFS).

    Note that NTFS is a pretty decent file system, offering reasonable performance and good reliablility. There's nothing wrong with NTFS, but it's a one size fits all approach. Indeed, I'd agree that one size does fit nearly all. Linux, however, gives you options to address those exceptional situations where the default FS is less than idea.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  164. What A Joke Of A Legal System by Phlosten · · Score: 1

    The fact that one must offload their own business that they built up, just to defend themselves?! What a joke. Guilty or not-guilty, it is another example of an individual getting destroyed by the system.

  165. angrykeyboarder to purchase Namesys by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    PHOENIX, ARIZONA 25 December 2006

    angrykeyboarder enterprises, d/b/a: angrykeyboarder and angrykeyboarder.com announced today it's intent to purchase the assets of Namesys, including the ReiserFS (a/k/a: Reiser3) and Reiser4 filesystems often used with Linux.

    ReiserFS (a/k/a: Reiser3) will be re-branded "angryFS" while Reiser4 will be re-branded "KillaFS".

    More details to follow in January 2007.

    FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including statements relating to the growth of our business. Actual results may differ materially from our expected results. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from our expectations include competition, our ability to continue to attract users to a "tainted" business, general economic conditions and those economic conditions specific to the The Free Software/Open Source Community, our ability to innovate and improve monetization, and the growth of the market for infamous filesystems. More information about potential risk factors is not included in our report on Form 10-Q when we do not and never will file with the SEC.

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  166. Re:WinFS by WgT2 · · Score: 1

    That's a great idea who's time might come. Especially if application extensions continue to proliferate.

  167. I don't see how shades of gray are relevant by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    My point is about the importance of the word "presumed". This whole "shades of gray" business has no bearing.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  168. Levels of free speech??? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    OH god I'm glad I don't live in whatever world you live in.