I use an old IBM keyboard thats about 10 years old. I can dump it upside down, shake it, and everything from cigarette ashes to hair fall out of it. Its a wonder it works. But hey, I can't complain, its better than those with the M$ logos on them. This is your plain old standard IBM keyboard.
This is right from their site...
"LinDVD is expected to be available late in the second quarter of 2000"
Right. Ok, Where the fuck is it? Sounds like they are 2 busy sniffing M$'s ass.
Well, linuXgod.net has an A+ on security.
I ask people to try at it when in not using
the connection. Its fun to watch them. Like
little lemmings going for telnet first. Its
fun to sit back and laugh. THe M$ users are
the funniest of them all to watch.
M$ tries to do this all the time.. If you think about it..... Last night I was trying to make a NT domain on Samba for a 2000Pro machine that im using for a class project. It seems that M$ is trying to FORCE you to use 2000. The 98 machine will logon to the NT domain, but the 2000 one won't. The only think i can do is use the shares. Bill gates won't gain anything from this but a bunch of pissed off people.
I thought i took my time to download an AD blocker. I don't like seeing those damned things.
If i like somthing ill goto the site. I don't need, or want an ad.
ICC has that crap. and I REFUSE to use it.
Thats the 2nd reason i leave my machine online
while im there. So i won't have to use
their shitty so called 'pipeline'.
jd@linuxgod [8:15pm] ~ > telnet www.westernunion.com 80
Trying 208.244.136.46...
Connected to www.westernunion.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:29:08 GMT
Connection: close
Content-Length: 407
Content-Type: text/html
Connection closed by foreign host.
jd@linuxgod [8:19pm] ~ >
Netscape works fine on it. Try NS 4.75.
You will see a difference between it and the previous versions of NS. The ones b4 4.75 usually cause the system (Linux) to run kinda hard in X.
All it is is a infinite Java loop.
Im sitting on a 2000 OS right now, and its
the damn near easiest thing to use. The article is right. The more userfriendly. The less security, and stability. Its been 4 days since ive had 2000 installed as a 2ndary OS next to Linux, and its already crashed about 3 times. The GUI has given out 2 times, and 1 BSOD during install.
My server, Slackware, Linux 2.2.16. Is NOT all that easy to use since ive done most of the system building, and prog architexture myself. And the best thing is, its NEVER crashed. And i installed it about.. 1 1/2 years ago. Id have to check the uptime too, because its been up since the release of 2.2.16.
SOunds like a bunch of idiotic winblows admins
crowded around a Unixbox trying to figure where to click their little mouse.
Fuck the FCC. I don't like half the shit
those sons of bitches do anyway. What is their site? Ill send them an unhappy email...
I signed, deffinately. Even though im from North America too.... Screw these damn companys. The hell with them all.
I hope they burn.. HEY! Thats a good idea!
To my knoledge Alan Cox uses RedHat also.
I use an old IBM keyboard thats about 10 years old. I can dump it upside down, shake it, and everything from cigarette ashes to hair fall out of it. Its a wonder it works. But hey, I can't complain, its better than those with the M$ logos on them. This is your plain old standard IBM keyboard.
OpenBSD isn't as secure as you think it is.
IP MASQ. Linux 2.2.16, Xinetd Partial firewall
indestructable.... LINUXGOD.NET.
I hate large companies. Especially Billy's. Nuff said.
hehe, I have a few IBM PS/2s that i got from some P75s. I LOVE those mice.
I use my server as a router also with a partial
firewall, I don't see why they shouldn't do it.
This is right from their site...
"LinDVD is expected to be available late in the second quarter of 2000"
Right. Ok, Where the fuck is it? Sounds like they are 2 busy sniffing M$'s ass.
Well, linuXgod.net has an A+ on security.
I ask people to try at it when in not using
the connection. Its fun to watch them. Like
little lemmings going for telnet first. Its
fun to sit back and laugh. THe M$ users are
the funniest of them all to watch.
M$ tries to do this all the time.. If you think about it..... Last night I was trying to make a NT domain on Samba for a 2000Pro machine that im using for a class project. It seems that M$ is trying to FORCE you to use 2000. The 98 machine will logon to the NT domain, but the 2000 one won't. The only think i can do is use the shares. Bill gates won't gain anything from this but a bunch of pissed off people.
Yes.
I thought i took my time to download an AD blocker. I don't like seeing those damned things.
If i like somthing ill goto the site. I don't need, or want an ad.
ICC has that crap. and I REFUSE to use it.
Thats the 2nd reason i leave my machine online
while im there. So i won't have to use
their shitty so called 'pipeline'.
jd@linuxgod [8:15pm] ~ > telnet www.westernunion.com 80
Trying 208.244.136.46...
Connected to www.westernunion.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Server: Microsoft-IIS/4.0
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:29:08 GMT
Connection: close
Content-Length: 407
Content-Type: text/html
Connection closed by foreign host.
jd@linuxgod [8:19pm] ~ >
HAHA, Aw, did their little NT4 peice of shit
get hacked? "Your not going anywhere today."
Exactly. AOL is a germ, virus, or envation of harmful substances onto the net. Do those people really know how the net works? NO.
Thats where UPS comes in handy. :-)
I have 2, one for ws, and server.
And the other for 1 ws.
Thats hard to do when your tape backup gave out about 2 months b4.
Netscape works fine on it. Try NS 4.75.
You will see a difference between it and the previous versions of NS. The ones b4 4.75 usually cause the system (Linux) to run kinda hard in X.
All it is is a infinite Java loop.
Im sitting on a 2000 OS right now, and its
the damn near easiest thing to use. The article is right. The more userfriendly. The less security, and stability. Its been 4 days since ive had 2000 installed as a 2ndary OS next to Linux, and its already crashed about 3 times. The GUI has given out 2 times, and 1 BSOD during install.
My server, Slackware, Linux 2.2.16. Is NOT all that easy to use since ive done most of the system building, and prog architexture myself. And the best thing is, its NEVER crashed. And i installed it about.. 1 1/2 years ago. Id have to check the uptime too, because its been up since the release of 2.2.16.
Who would be that fucking stupid?
DL Slackware 7.x and you get a system
with 100x the stability and 100x the security.
Yes, that sucks.
I get that crap to.