I thought hiding your porn habits from the wife or employer was the biggest attraction?
THIS is why most people use private browsing. Most people's wives/husbands aren't going to know how to view SSL keys, etc. Most people just look at the history/bookmarks if they're snooping.
Plus, browsers in private mode still utilize the DNS cache, so a simple/ipconfig displaydns would show where you've been as well.
You're right! America never prospered until Bush came into office! And whenever people think of oil, they think TEXAS, not that other place (somewhere in the Middle East, I forget, it's not important...or is the Middle East a county in Texas?).
The reason America is "rich" is not because "it had the world's currency." I think you have it the other way around. America is "the world's currency" (whatever that means) because America is "rich"
If I break into your house and steal everything, it's illegal. If I break into your house and leave a note saying "Hey your locks aren't very good" it's still breaking and entering; still illegal.
What matters is the overall opinion of the American population
Couldn't be further from the truth. As long as they keep getting reelected, officials don't give two shits about the American people. It isn't the people's opinion that passes the laws, its the lobbyists and the interests of the corporations they represent.
All a malicious website would have to do to surreptitiously extract Address Book card data from Safari is dynamically create form text fields with the aforementioned names, probably invisibly, and then simulate A-Z keystroke events using JavaScript. When data is populated, that is AutoFill’ed, it can be accessed and sent to the attacker.
All a malicious website would have to do to surreptitiously extract Address Book card data from Safari is dynamically create form text fields with the aforementioned names, probably invisibly, and then simulate A-Z keystroke events using JavaScript. When data is populated, that is AutoFill’ed, it can be accessed and sent to the attacker.
I agree with what you're saying, but it seems to me that the situation you presented would solve itself. The true talent gets fed up and leaves sites such as that, all that's left is the same old crap. Maybe the masses who wouldn't be able to afford good art gets the crap, and the people who want quality art pays a professional.
Either that or there will be a few talented people who find a niche in that market and are truly talented, and able to succeed on a site like that.
In Pathfinder, which is based on 3.5, it's arguably one of the best classes. In fact the Paizo forums are full of people bitching about Paladins being overpowered. Now I'll just reference them to this article.
You've completely missed the mark there bud. Nobody's pissed because of that. They want credit where credit is due, not money.
There's a huge difference between knowing Steve made a photo, and paying Steve for the photo. Plus, Steve's a cool guy. If we know it was his photo, we can find similar photos.
At least two of the instances you've shown, the people in the videos have committed crimes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Udf1tY3Fl2U in this one, he ran from the police, which in itself is a felony. I'm not saying the police were right in their actions, but the man broke the law. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmPi2GbbUes in this, jaywalking is against the law. Granted, it not often enforced, but that doesn't make the action any more legal. The law was still broken. Granted, the police didn't handle the situation the best, and in most of the other videos I don't know enough to comment, but you're comparing apples and oranges.
I wonder if they found him using the Gizmodo journalist's computer, which according to the EFF, was an illegal warrant. If it is found to be an illegal warrant, I wonder how it would affect this case? Not that I feel sorry for the guy, he sold stolen property, he's a criminal (pending the jury finding him guilty). The only thing I'm questioning is the legality of the authorities' methods of finding him.
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/gizmodo-search-warrant-illegal
Re:It should read 'stoopid people hath spoken'
on
Terry Childs Found Guilty
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
From http://www.cio.com.au/article/255165/sorting_facts_terry_childs_case?pp=2&fp=&fpid=
"DTIS officials demanded that Childs relinquish the usernames and passwords used to access the FiberWAN network devices, and Childs refused to do so. He was suspended for insubordination on July 9. "
He was arrested shortly thereafter.
DTIS is the city's IT department. His refusing to disclose passwords to a public court has nothing to do with why he was arrested and found guilty.
From TFA: "Corynne McSherry, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, explains how fair use works: It lets people use a film clip or a paragraph from an article or a piece of music if they are creating commentary or satire."
So what I've gathered, unless an attorney with the EFF is an outright liar, the fact that "a parody comments on the work itself; a satire uses the work to comment on something else" is a useless statement to the context of the Downfall situation, and also to these songs, because satire is still covered by fair use.
Slashdot Mirror
I thought hiding your porn habits from the wife or employer was the biggest attraction?
THIS is why most people use private browsing. Most people's wives/husbands aren't going to know how to view SSL keys, etc. Most people just look at the history/bookmarks if they're snooping.
/ipconfig displaydns would show where you've been as well.
Plus, browsers in private mode still utilize the DNS cache, so a simple
You're right! America never prospered until Bush came into office! And whenever people think of oil, they think TEXAS, not that other place (somewhere in the Middle East, I forget, it's not important...or is the Middle East a county in Texas?). The reason America is "rich" is not because "it had the world's currency." I think you have it the other way around. America is "the world's currency" (whatever that means) because America is "rich"
If I break into your house and steal everything, it's illegal. If I break into your house and leave a note saying "Hey your locks aren't very good" it's still breaking and entering; still illegal.
What matters is the overall opinion of the American population
Couldn't be further from the truth. As long as they keep getting reelected, officials don't give two shits about the American people. It isn't the people's opinion that passes the laws, its the lobbyists and the interests of the corporations they represent.
All a malicious website would have to do to surreptitiously extract Address Book card data from Safari is dynamically create form text fields with the aforementioned names, probably invisibly, and then simulate A-Z keystroke events using JavaScript. When data is populated, that is AutoFill’ed, it can be accessed and sent to the attacker.
Did you even read the article?
All a malicious website would have to do to surreptitiously extract Address Book card data from Safari is dynamically create form text fields with the aforementioned names, probably invisibly, and then simulate A-Z keystroke events using JavaScript. When data is populated, that is AutoFill’ed, it can be accessed and sent to the attacker.
I agree with what you're saying, but it seems to me that the situation you presented would solve itself. The true talent gets fed up and leaves sites such as that, all that's left is the same old crap. Maybe the masses who wouldn't be able to afford good art gets the crap, and the people who want quality art pays a professional. Either that or there will be a few talented people who find a niche in that market and are truly talented, and able to succeed on a site like that.
In Pathfinder, which is based on 3.5, it's arguably one of the best classes. In fact the Paizo forums are full of people bitching about Paladins being overpowered. Now I'll just reference them to this article.
It's stupid of me to leave my door unlocked, but if you walk right in and start taking stuff it's still wrong.
"Solar powered lightbulbs" Shit, growing up we just called those mirrors.
anonymous@linux:~$ unzip
anonymous@linux:~$ mount
anonymous@linux:~$ fsck
anonymous@linux:~$ unmount
You've completely missed the mark there bud. Nobody's pissed because of that. They want credit where credit is due, not money. There's a huge difference between knowing Steve made a photo, and paying Steve for the photo. Plus, Steve's a cool guy. If we know it was his photo, we can find similar photos.
At least two of the instances you've shown, the people in the videos have committed crimes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Udf1tY3Fl2U in this one, he ran from the police, which in itself is a felony. I'm not saying the police were right in their actions, but the man broke the law. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmPi2GbbUes in this, jaywalking is against the law. Granted, it not often enforced, but that doesn't make the action any more legal. The law was still broken. Granted, the police didn't handle the situation the best, and in most of the other videos I don't know enough to comment, but you're comparing apples and oranges.
I wonder if they found him using the Gizmodo journalist's computer, which according to the EFF, was an illegal warrant. If it is found to be an illegal warrant, I wonder how it would affect this case? Not that I feel sorry for the guy, he sold stolen property, he's a criminal (pending the jury finding him guilty). The only thing I'm questioning is the legality of the authorities' methods of finding him. http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/gizmodo-search-warrant-illegal
From http://www.cio.com.au/article/255165/sorting_facts_terry_childs_case?pp=2&fp=&fpid= "DTIS officials demanded that Childs relinquish the usernames and passwords used to access the FiberWAN network devices, and Childs refused to do so. He was suspended for insubordination on July 9. " He was arrested shortly thereafter. DTIS is the city's IT department. His refusing to disclose passwords to a public court has nothing to do with why he was arrested and found guilty.
From TFA: "Corynne McSherry, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, explains how fair use works: It lets people use a film clip or a paragraph from an article or a piece of music if they are creating commentary or satire." So what I've gathered, unless an attorney with the EFF is an outright liar, the fact that "a parody comments on the work itself; a satire uses the work to comment on something else" is a useless statement to the context of the Downfall situation, and also to these songs, because satire is still covered by fair use.