That can never truly be answered as it depends on a large variety of factors including the film, the processing, the recording equipment (sometimes film isn't the limiting factor) and the lighting conditions.
Notwithstanding, I have put my constructive suggestion on the table. So what's yours?
No my suggestion of the big-donor model is still perfectly acceptable. Your example of Ubuntu as to why it doesn't work has no relevance as the project failed to achieve what you are looking for for completely different reasons.
My suggestion remains unchanged. The original idea you had was getting the features you want, not gaining mass market acceptance for a product, something which has failed for multiple distributions following multiple different development models.
you lash out and call this apparently foreign concept "delusional" and "absurd". Nice.
You're the one who started with generalities replying to my comment on dynamic content. I really don't know what response you were expecting other than that it is absurd, and that you posting here is proof of why it is actually a good thing to have.
And quite critically viable enough that until a couple of weeks ago when Model 3s started selling in Europe they were the most popular EVs on the market far outselling the Model S and Model X. Time will tell if the Model 3's EU success is due to good honeymoon sales or if it actually sustains it's Q1 position in the longer term, I'm thinking it's a bit of both and the Zoe finally has some competition in Europe, rather than the other way around.
Why? Cheaper poorer range cars have always been available. The only reason it would qualify as news over a truly new entrant is due to how long people have had to wait for Tesla.
Tesla's original goal was to change the world. Having yet another option coming to market is bigger news than an iterative release Tesla has been promising for months.
Mostly I'm talking about the failure of Ubuntu to become a serious alternative for "the filthy masses". Linux remains a niche market.
And what feature could you donate that makes it a "serious" alternative for the filthy masses? Ubuntu didn't fail from a development for a target audience point of view, it failed against a large well funded and vertically integrated monopoly with a lot of money to throw at contenders in terms of marketing.
Linux could be the perfect and most ideal system in every way and offer free blowjobs with every download and it won't ever become a "serious" alternative given it's absence of advertising, expectation subversion (unable to run windows software, remember those masses are filthy), and complete lack of any vertical integration or default pre-bundling.
Repeating irrelevant shit doesn't make it relevant. And it's not the best selling GPU. That title belongs to Intel who ship one with every processor. Maybe you should get that instead. It's even cheaper! Tough Love logic woot woot.
Yeah I too was on the up and up but then I drank a coffee with my avocado breakfast and the bank decided I couldn't afford a $500k house. Now I sit on reddit begging for tips to try and make ends meet.
"A dynamically generated internet" is just code for breaking the fundamental design of the web, by serving variable content for identical requests based on ephemeral server-side state.
Not quite. Either
a) You're under the impression that requests are identical. They aren't. Requests are stateful and depend on the context with which they were made.
b) You're under the delusion that a completely static internet depending on the request is a good thing. That would be fundamentally broken design in todays world. The internet isn't the black and white text crap that was featured on Slashdot last week.
Speaking of Slashdot if you now click on this link: https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... you may notice a few things. You may notice that it's your user name in the top right and not mine. You may notice that you made a post. You will also notice that since you last visited that page there is additional content replying to you and calling out the absurdity of your claim. That comment was brought to you through the power of the fundamentally broken web as is your ability to reply to it.
Having a procedure electoral college between voters and the president doesn't in any way invalidate what the GP said given that there electoral college hours based on the decision of the population.
All you really did whole pretending to disagree with the GP was provide a nice expatiation of why they were right.
Ignore my last comment, you deserve a proper response: To go down a list of points:
1. Electricity grid mismanagement and renewable policies are not the same thing. There are places with bigger price rises in electricity happily burning more coal than they did in the past. There are places with far more green energy where prices have fallen. You are complaining about one thing and using it as evidence against another.
2. 0.185kWh isn't an insanely high cost of electricity. It's normal once you get away from your fantasy prices funded by the destruction of your own health. People shouldn't flee those prices they should adapt. The fact that they flee rather than actually reduce your ridiculously inefficient living (Canada is outdone by very few in energy consumption per household) is more of a poor reflection on those people than anything else. We'll welcome them with open arms here, but they'll need to open their wallets (0.22/kWh and we have shithouse green policies here and just opened a new coal fired power station 2 years ago to boot)
3. WTF are you doing that is breaking the bank heating houses with electricity. Don't tell me you are using turn of the previous century era bar heaters.
4. BC has used hydro power for a long time. So thanks for pointing me towards them, it further reinforces that green power has nothing to do with the problems you describe.
5. Just because a political party suffers the wrath of a population doesn't mean that what they were doing didn't make sense (or was even related to green energy for that matter). We too relegated one of our major parties to a minority party. They proceeded to win the immediate following election. Turns out they weren't as bad as people thought.
The OP is similarly wrong about Australia. The meteoric rise in electricity costs were the result of a massive gold plating effort for long distance transmission. However that is completely irrelevant since what is being quoted is the difference in wholesale and retail electricity costs. The wholesale cost spikes to that extent not because of green or dirty power, but because of not enough power. It's an exercise in convincing industrial users to load shed by pricing them out of the market.
Incidentally these spikes are usually the result of high temperature on sunny days and would be best resolved in installing more solar capacity.
I don't install thousands of machines, I'm not a Windows sysadmin and never want to be.
So it's no surprise that you're quite literally doing it wrong. The windows enterprise ISO is nothing more than windows Pro with the additional tools on it to roll out using Microsoft Window's Autopilot. You're getting almost no benefits of Windows Enterprise by just installing it in a way it wasn't designed to be.
So again, just because you installed the Enterprise release in a way it's not meant to be installed, doesn't mean that it isn't fully customisable for enterprises including removing the very thing you're complaining about.
What does the pre-installed xbox app have to do with game development? In the words of Microsoft, it's an application to "See what your friends are playing, share and watch game clips, and access Game Hubs for your favorite titles.".
The Xbox tool does a variety of things (e.g. steaming, integrated screenshoting, and providing HUD overlays) and game developers are required to test against these. It also detects the presence of a running game and changes Windows settings in the background, e.g. enables high performance mode, enables dnd on notifications, and pauses background system processes so your frag fest isn't suddenly lagged out by downloading a windows update.
So yes it has as much to do with game development as having Windows 10, Windows 8.1, and Windows 7 around to actually check to see if your game actually runs.
Your ignorance is causing you to be profane. Your problem.
I'll take my ignorance along with that of my massive DVD collection, massive Bluray collection, list of Firmware hacks on the internet to bypass the user content skip blocks, and the endless articles on the internet talking about the problem you seem to think doesn't exist.
It's better than.... oh wait maybe your magical fairy land where the rules of reality don't seem to apply doesn't sound too bad... Where do you live? Or maybe you're so desensitized to ads that you don't know what they are anymore. Is an advert no longer an advert when it ends with a Sony pictures logo?
But whatever enjoy your fantasy. I'll keep talking to real people who have real DVD and Blurays and experience problems so real they have their own wikipedia pages. Consider yourself lucky you're not part of the normal world.
The one that has worked so poorly for Ubuntu and various other examples.
... How poorly has it worked for a Linux distribution that came from a Debian fork and had it's limelight as the most popular distro on the market? Or are you talking about a specific case not a general one?
Nvidia's warehouse full of obsolete cards problem is still not solved according to their own quarterly report.
There last report was two and a half months ago and showed a massive decline. But sure, it's not like you've said anything else that's correct. So why not keep with it.
Doesn't matter whether is physically Nvidia's warehouse, or OEM warehouses, or not warehouse at all, just a self store, it is still Nvidia's problem.
Yeah because ASUS warehousing an ASUS card is somehow NVIDIA's (who have successfully made a sale to the OEM at that point) problem. uh-huh. Sure. Let's go with that. It's not like you've said anything else that's correct. SO why not keep with it.
Thanks for your generous crusade to educate the world
I am truly sorry I have failed you.
What I actually think, you're just a garden variety obsessive-compulsive numbskull with an exaggerated estimation of their own mental abilities.
But since you've been wrong about everything else, let me help you with this one too. I'm not obsessive compulsive, I simply get joy arguing with wrong people on the internet. I just got out of bed here in the Azores, I opened my laptop, went to Slashdot, went down my list of repiles, and then grinned ear to ear when I saw that you have posted. I have so very much enjoyed sparing with you. I mean as much as any black belt can enjoy sparing with someone who turned up with a "come and try" coupon.
Anyway maybe one day you'll understand how the gaming GPU market works. Until then enjoy "future proofing" your system with a card low end enough that it's already being listed on as "recommended" specs on some games. AMD thanks you for it's short term and ever repeating business.
But since this thread will be archived within the year, let me just get it out of my system now: For the you of 2020 who just bought yet another "future proof" video card I say this: *hands on my hips* *inhale* "HAHAHHAHAHAH"
Software is not a perfect democracy. Not Chrome, not open source projects, not those by mega corporations, not those by single developers.
You want something, why don't *you* put the effort in. Hire a developer to code that thing you want and integrate it in Firefox. In the meantime just because you don't want something doesn't mean that Google hasn't achieved great market share understanding their users.
Slashdot Mirror
That can never truly be answered as it depends on a large variety of factors including the film, the processing, the recording equipment (sometimes film isn't the limiting factor) and the lighting conditions.
Notwithstanding, I have put my constructive suggestion on the table. So what's yours?
No my suggestion of the big-donor model is still perfectly acceptable. Your example of Ubuntu as to why it doesn't work has no relevance as the project failed to achieve what you are looking for for completely different reasons.
My suggestion remains unchanged. The original idea you had was getting the features you want, not gaining mass market acceptance for a product, something which has failed for multiple distributions following multiple different development models.
you lash out and call this apparently foreign concept "delusional" and "absurd". Nice.
You're the one who started with generalities replying to my comment on dynamic content. I really don't know what response you were expecting other than that it is absurd, and that you posting here is proof of why it is actually a good thing to have.
And quite critically viable enough that until a couple of weeks ago when Model 3s started selling in Europe they were the most popular EVs on the market far outselling the Model S and Model X. Time will tell if the Model 3's EU success is due to good honeymoon sales or if it actually sustains it's Q1 position in the longer term, I'm thinking it's a bit of both and the Zoe finally has some competition in Europe, rather than the other way around.
It has been fascinating watching someone revert to a child state.
Closing the stores? Where are you supposed to go to get the car serviced?
Service center, or use one of their mobile service options? I can't say I've ever driven my car back to a showroom for a service.
You forgot the quotes tags and a reply. I guess you've finally given up since you're just a broken record now.
To be honest, I'm impressed you lasted. Most people give up after repeating the same debunked garbage twice. You managed to do it three times.
which IMO is bigger news.
Why? Cheaper poorer range cars have always been available. The only reason it would qualify as news over a truly new entrant is due to how long people have had to wait for Tesla.
Tesla's original goal was to change the world. Having yet another option coming to market is bigger news than an iterative release Tesla has been promising for months.
Mostly I'm talking about the failure of Ubuntu to become a serious alternative for "the filthy masses". Linux remains a niche market.
And what feature could you donate that makes it a "serious" alternative for the filthy masses? Ubuntu didn't fail from a development for a target audience point of view, it failed against a large well funded and vertically integrated monopoly with a lot of money to throw at contenders in terms of marketing.
Linux could be the perfect and most ideal system in every way and offer free blowjobs with every download and it won't ever become a "serious" alternative given it's absence of advertising, expectation subversion (unable to run windows software, remember those masses are filthy), and complete lack of any vertical integration or default pre-bundling.
Repeating irrelevant shit doesn't make it relevant. And it's not the best selling GPU. That title belongs to Intel who ship one with every processor. Maybe you should get that instead. It's even cheaper! Tough Love logic woot woot.
Life is better without Reddit.
Reddit is just communicating with other peop... oh I see what you did there.
Yeah I too was on the up and up but then I drank a coffee with my avocado breakfast and the bank decided I couldn't afford a $500k house. Now I sit on reddit begging for tips to try and make ends meet.
#missunderstoodmilenial.
"A dynamically generated internet" is just code for breaking the fundamental design of the web, by serving variable content for identical requests based on ephemeral server-side state.
Not quite. Either
a) You're under the impression that requests are identical. They aren't. Requests are stateful and depend on the context with which they were made.
b) You're under the delusion that a completely static internet depending on the request is a good thing. That would be fundamentally broken design in todays world. The internet isn't the black and white text crap that was featured on Slashdot last week.
Speaking of Slashdot if you now click on this link: https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... you may notice a few things. You may notice that it's your user name in the top right and not mine. You may notice that you made a post. You will also notice that since you last visited that page there is additional content replying to you and calling out the absurdity of your claim. That comment was brought to you through the power of the fundamentally broken web as is your ability to reply to it.
"Simple" are the people who can't figure out how to "simply" use less.
Having a procedure electoral college between voters and the president doesn't in any way invalidate what the GP said given that there electoral college hours based on the decision of the population.
All you really did whole pretending to disagree with the GP was provide a nice expatiation of why they were right.
Ignore my last comment, you deserve a proper response: To go down a list of points:
1. Electricity grid mismanagement and renewable policies are not the same thing. There are places with bigger price rises in electricity happily burning more coal than they did in the past. There are places with far more green energy where prices have fallen. You are complaining about one thing and using it as evidence against another.
2. 0.185kWh isn't an insanely high cost of electricity. It's normal once you get away from your fantasy prices funded by the destruction of your own health. People shouldn't flee those prices they should adapt. The fact that they flee rather than actually reduce your ridiculously inefficient living (Canada is outdone by very few in energy consumption per household) is more of a poor reflection on those people than anything else. We'll welcome them with open arms here, but they'll need to open their wallets (0.22/kWh and we have shithouse green policies here and just opened a new coal fired power station 2 years ago to boot)
3. WTF are you doing that is breaking the bank heating houses with electricity. Don't tell me you are using turn of the previous century era bar heaters.
4. BC has used hydro power for a long time. So thanks for pointing me towards them, it further reinforces that green power has nothing to do with the problems you describe.
5. Just because a political party suffers the wrath of a population doesn't mean that what they were doing didn't make sense (or was even related to green energy for that matter). We too relegated one of our major parties to a minority party. They proceeded to win the immediate following election. Turns out they weren't as bad as people thought.
Today you pay between 0.085 and 0.185kWh.
People are fleeing such cheap electricity? Why not simply use less?
The OP is similarly wrong about Australia. The meteoric rise in electricity costs were the result of a massive gold plating effort for long distance transmission. However that is completely irrelevant since what is being quoted is the difference in wholesale and retail electricity costs. The wholesale cost spikes to that extent not because of green or dirty power, but because of not enough power. It's an exercise in convincing industrial users to load shed by pricing them out of the market.
Incidentally these spikes are usually the result of high temperature on sunny days and would be best resolved in installing more solar capacity.
I don't install thousands of machines, I'm not a Windows sysadmin and never want to be.
So it's no surprise that you're quite literally doing it wrong. The windows enterprise ISO is nothing more than windows Pro with the additional tools on it to roll out using Microsoft Window's Autopilot. You're getting almost no benefits of Windows Enterprise by just installing it in a way it wasn't designed to be.
So again, just because you installed the Enterprise release in a way it's not meant to be installed, doesn't mean that it isn't fully customisable for enterprises including removing the very thing you're complaining about.
What does the pre-installed xbox app have to do with game development? In the words of Microsoft, it's an application to "See what your friends are playing, share and watch game clips, and access Game Hubs for your favorite titles.".
The Xbox tool does a variety of things (e.g. steaming, integrated screenshoting, and providing HUD overlays) and game developers are required to test against these. It also detects the presence of a running game and changes Windows settings in the background, e.g. enables high performance mode, enables dnd on notifications, and pauses background system processes so your frag fest isn't suddenly lagged out by downloading a windows update.
So yes it has as much to do with game development as having Windows 10, Windows 8.1, and Windows 7 around to actually check to see if your game actually runs.
Your ignorance is causing you to be profane. Your problem.
I'll take my ignorance along with that of my massive DVD collection, massive Bluray collection, list of Firmware hacks on the internet to bypass the user content skip blocks, and the endless articles on the internet talking about the problem you seem to think doesn't exist.
It's better than .... oh wait maybe your magical fairy land where the rules of reality don't seem to apply doesn't sound too bad... Where do you live? Or maybe you're so desensitized to ads that you don't know what they are anymore. Is an advert no longer an advert when it ends with a Sony pictures logo?
But whatever enjoy your fantasy. I'll keep talking to real people who have real DVD and Blurays and experience problems so real they have their own wikipedia pages. Consider yourself lucky you're not part of the normal world.
The one that has worked so poorly for Ubuntu and various other examples.
... How poorly has it worked for a Linux distribution that came from a Debian fork and had it's limelight as the most popular distro on the market? Or are you talking about a specific case not a general one?
Nvidia's warehouse full of obsolete cards problem is still not solved according to their own quarterly report.
There last report was two and a half months ago and showed a massive decline. But sure, it's not like you've said anything else that's correct. So why not keep with it.
Doesn't matter whether is physically Nvidia's warehouse, or OEM warehouses, or not warehouse at all, just a self store, it is still Nvidia's problem.
Yeah because ASUS warehousing an ASUS card is somehow NVIDIA's (who have successfully made a sale to the OEM at that point) problem. uh-huh. Sure. Let's go with that. It's not like you've said anything else that's correct. SO why not keep with it.
Thanks for your generous crusade to educate the world
I am truly sorry I have failed you.
What I actually think, you're just a garden variety obsessive-compulsive numbskull with an exaggerated estimation of their own mental abilities.
But since you've been wrong about everything else, let me help you with this one too. I'm not obsessive compulsive, I simply get joy arguing with wrong people on the internet. I just got out of bed here in the Azores, I opened my laptop, went to Slashdot, went down my list of repiles, and then grinned ear to ear when I saw that you have posted. I have so very much enjoyed sparing with you. I mean as much as any black belt can enjoy sparing with someone who turned up with a "come and try" coupon.
Anyway maybe one day you'll understand how the gaming GPU market works. Until then enjoy "future proofing" your system with a card low end enough that it's already being listed on as "recommended" specs on some games. AMD thanks you for it's short term and ever repeating business.
But since this thread will be archived within the year, let me just get it out of my system now: For the you of 2020 who just bought yet another "future proof" video card I say this: *hands on my hips* *inhale* "HAHAHHAHAHAH"
Have you seen inside a 2.5" SSD? Here's the inside of the 1TB SSD I have: https://images.anandtech.com/d...
. And the truly sad part about this. You are the only one that pointed it out.
No he isn't. Not only is he not the only one, he wasn't even the first.
Software is not a perfect democracy. Not Chrome, not open source projects, not those by mega corporations, not those by single developers.
You want something, why don't *you* put the effort in. Hire a developer to code that thing you want and integrate it in Firefox. In the meantime just because you don't want something doesn't mean that Google hasn't achieved great market share understanding their users.