Selective statistics don't tell the whole story, but yeah, you're right, the death of family farming is going to be great for our country. Long Live Monsanto!
Greed and efficiency are related, because one is simply a subjective judgement on the other.
If a craftsman can create a nice pretty and highly functional arrowhead in 18 hours, and an journeyman can make one every hour using simpler techniques, he can build 18 arrowheads in the same time as a craftsman can make in an hour, and that has its own advantages. You can call that "greed" all you want, but when trading time comes, the guy with 18 arrowheads is gonna get more in trade than the guy with only one, even if it is better constructed and prettier. Though the nice one will likely end up with the chief / prince / king as a ceremonial piece that is never actually used.
Greed (subjective interpretation) is, for lack of better understanding, how trade actually works. After all, what does Uggah need with 18 semi automatic arrowheads?
1) Retard is not longer acceptable epithet, especially among the politically correct enlightened liberal crowd. You might want to try a more intelligent word.
2) This means Clinton was so unlikable, America wanted a "retard" over her. Again, not very good position for liberals and democrats.
You might want to go back to the insult drawing board, since most of your lameness is actually a poor reflection on the whole Clinton Campaign.
I bet the "tens of thousands" of dollars spent was really successful, considering that Clinton and surrogates spent 1.5 Billion influencing her electoral failures.
But yeah, keep on blaming the Russians for her loss, because that totally happened!
That would be a great theory, except that the MSM and all the big players in DC have been telling us for the last 1.5 years that Russia has Trump in their pocket.
It makes way more sense if you said this was the Three Letter Agencies involved and their deep state overlords ordered this a payback for "Russia Hacking The Election".
Further, if it is what you say it is, it defeats the whole "Russia Hacked The Election" at several levels, namely it backfiring on the Russians. They probably have more dirt on Clintons due to Bill's sexcapades and Hillary's power hungry greed.
My real view is that this is just normal everyday slimy nationalistic rah-rah saber rattling. Yawn.
My favorite customer is related to yours. This customer knows exactly what he wants, in detail, and you deliver it to him exactly as he asked for it, and they don't like it. Mind you, you make lots of helpful suggestions along the way, which they hate. Then they go to another vendor, and they get exactly what you pitched them.
A number is not proof of identity. It is a reference number to help establish that you are who you say you are. Having identifying information, like a Social Security Number is not proof of identity, it simply is a tool in what should be a chain of tools to help one verify (key word) identity.
People who accept it as "proof" of identity are misusing it, and should be held accountable for that misuse. Any Line of Credit established without enough other evidence is itself evidence of lack of due diligence.
She couldn't be bothered to attend meetings for her Country's recovery, but somehow managed to get a T-shirt and had printed. If that was reversed (politically), you'd be right to criticize.
Only hypocrites and politics (probably synonyms) makes it so that "Never" is a good time.
This is akin to Russia buying 1000-foot-tall billboards above every voting place in battleground states
Not quite. The $100,000 Facebook "Russian" ads pales in comparison to the nearly 2 billion spent on the Presidential Election (Nearly 1.5 billion in favor of Clinton).
What the means is that Clinton's marketing was fucked up. And the Democrats keep on this narrative, it makes them look even worse than before.
Which is funny given the MediaMatters take on it that it was the Republicans that were giving that excuse, when I saw Democrats explaining the incompetence of the officials in Puerto Rico, including one vocal mayor who couldn't be bothered to attend logistics meetings but managed to get custom shirt and hat made.
My experience is close to yours. I have OnePlus One, Nexus 6P, and now a OnePlus 3t, and my view is that OnePlus makes a damn fine phone. I had more problems with the 6P than with the OnePluses I've had.
Yeah, never mind that pesky 2nd Amendment and all the court decisions holding it up. What we need are more crappy judges who write their own laws arbitrarily abrogating the liberties of the people because the left can't actually get laws passed that make sane sense.
Filed under the "you have to pass it to see whats in it".
I actually know quite a few people in IT (Shocking I know!) in all sorts a various areas, and the one thing that distinguishes them from your average person is insatiable hunger for knowledge.
While I am sure there are those that only want to code, the majority (vast??) want to understand the problem so that they can actually code more effectively and efficiently. Understanding the problem they are coding for makes it easier to code for exceptions (there are always exceptions) and around potential pitfalls.
There is nothing worse than writing code out, and discovering after you've built a half million lines of code that you have to re-code everything to solve a problem you had no idea was even possible. Understanding the real problem helps eliminate those kinds of problems.
I have. I usually use a block between the hammer and the dowel to prevent exactly that. I hit the block, and the dowel goes in without marring anything. Tada!
He is saying the CLINTON/DNC campaign spend 1.5 billion dollars, was outsmarted by someone spending $100,000 (a drop in the bucket). He is saying the were inept (again).
The problem these people have, is that reality bites them in the ass every time they lie about something.
You are absolutely right. However, most of those features requires additional configuration/expenses and MS doesn't make it easy to get to them.
I use both Lync/SfB and Slack, and I can tell you, Slack just works. AND if Google gets its head out of its messaging crap, it would be loads better than Microsoft. I mean I have about a few ideas that would be game changers if Google just would ask me.
Your post points out the problem Microsoft actually has. They have two separate and distinct products that kinda sit in the same area. Its confusion and muddled messaging. Exactly the opposite considering they are messaging apps.
Selective statistics don't tell the whole story, but yeah, you're right, the death of family farming is going to be great for our country. Long Live Monsanto!
Greed and efficiency are related, because one is simply a subjective judgement on the other.
If a craftsman can create a nice pretty and highly functional arrowhead in 18 hours, and an journeyman can make one every hour using simpler techniques, he can build 18 arrowheads in the same time as a craftsman can make in an hour, and that has its own advantages. You can call that "greed" all you want, but when trading time comes, the guy with 18 arrowheads is gonna get more in trade than the guy with only one, even if it is better constructed and prettier. Though the nice one will likely end up with the chief / prince / king as a ceremonial piece that is never actually used.
Greed (subjective interpretation) is, for lack of better understanding, how trade actually works. After all, what does Uggah need with 18 semi automatic arrowheads?
Two things of note Mr (or Ms) AC.
1) Retard is not longer acceptable epithet, especially among the politically correct enlightened liberal crowd. You might want to try a more intelligent word.
2) This means Clinton was so unlikable, America wanted a "retard" over her. Again, not very good position for liberals and democrats.
You might want to go back to the insult drawing board, since most of your lameness is actually a poor reflection on the whole Clinton Campaign.
I bet the "tens of thousands" of dollars spent was really successful, considering that Clinton and surrogates spent 1.5 Billion influencing her electoral failures.
But yeah, keep on blaming the Russians for her loss, because that totally happened!
That would be a great theory, except that the MSM and all the big players in DC have been telling us for the last 1.5 years that Russia has Trump in their pocket.
It makes way more sense if you said this was the Three Letter Agencies involved and their deep state overlords ordered this a payback for "Russia Hacking The Election".
Further, if it is what you say it is, it defeats the whole "Russia Hacked The Election" at several levels, namely it backfiring on the Russians. They probably have more dirt on Clintons due to Bill's sexcapades and Hillary's power hungry greed.
My real view is that this is just normal everyday slimy nationalistic rah-rah saber rattling. Yawn.
Security through obscurity, via administrative dictate. Nice.
My favorite customer is related to yours. This customer knows exactly what he wants, in detail, and you deliver it to him exactly as he asked for it, and they don't like it. Mind you, you make lots of helpful suggestions along the way, which they hate. Then they go to another vendor, and they get exactly what you pitched them.
Obama for not being Bush ... He was Just elected. Affirmative Action Nobel Prize Winner
I have a very similar regret. We're in the same time frame for that regret. I feel a kind of kinship now.
A number is not proof of identity. It is a reference number to help establish that you are who you say you are. Having identifying information, like a Social Security Number is not proof of identity, it simply is a tool in what should be a chain of tools to help one verify (key word) identity.
People who accept it as "proof" of identity are misusing it, and should be held accountable for that misuse. Any Line of Credit established without enough other evidence is itself evidence of lack of due diligence.
Not to mention Streisand Effecting it into well known status.
I never knew about the site until they sued. Go figure.
She couldn't be bothered to attend meetings for her Country's recovery, but somehow managed to get a T-shirt and had printed. If that was reversed (politically), you'd be right to criticize.
Only hypocrites and politics (probably synonyms) makes it so that "Never" is a good time.
This is akin to Russia buying 1000-foot-tall billboards above every voting place in battleground states
Not quite. The $100,000 Facebook "Russian" ads pales in comparison to the nearly 2 billion spent on the Presidential Election (Nearly 1.5 billion in favor of Clinton).
What the means is that Clinton's marketing was fucked up. And the Democrats keep on this narrative, it makes them look even worse than before.
Which is funny given the MediaMatters take on it that it was the Republicans that were giving that excuse, when I saw Democrats explaining the incompetence of the officials in Puerto Rico, including one vocal mayor who couldn't be bothered to attend logistics meetings but managed to get custom shirt and hat made.
My experience is close to yours. I have OnePlus One, Nexus 6P, and now a OnePlus 3t, and my view is that OnePlus makes a damn fine phone. I had more problems with the 6P than with the OnePluses I've had.
Yeah, paywalls keep the stupid out. Nothing more.
Yup. It wasn't passed. Hypocrites on both sides. Just as hypocritical of Pelosi saying that her argument was suddenly wrong.
I can't defend (R) and I am not even going to try. I am neither (D) or (R). But there are hypocrites in all parties.
Yeah, never mind that pesky 2nd Amendment and all the court decisions holding it up. What we need are more crappy judges who write their own laws arbitrarily abrogating the liberties of the people because the left can't actually get laws passed that make sane sense.
Filed under the "you have to pass it to see whats in it".
incognito mode helps get around Paywalls especially when they have "free" versions for new visitors.
I actually know quite a few people in IT (Shocking I know!) in all sorts a various areas, and the one thing that distinguishes them from your average person is insatiable hunger for knowledge.
While I am sure there are those that only want to code, the majority (vast??) want to understand the problem so that they can actually code more effectively and efficiently. Understanding the problem they are coding for makes it easier to code for exceptions (there are always exceptions) and around potential pitfalls.
There is nothing worse than writing code out, and discovering after you've built a half million lines of code that you have to re-code everything to solve a problem you had no idea was even possible. Understanding the real problem helps eliminate those kinds of problems.
I have. I usually use a block between the hammer and the dowel to prevent exactly that. I hit the block, and the dowel goes in without marring anything. Tada!
He is saying the CLINTON/DNC campaign spend 1.5 billion dollars, was outsmarted by someone spending $100,000 (a drop in the bucket). He is saying the were inept (again).
The problem these people have, is that reality bites them in the ass every time they lie about something.
CE is covered ....
requires additional configuration/ expenses
You are absolutely right. However, most of those features requires additional configuration/expenses and MS doesn't make it easy to get to them.
I use both Lync/SfB and Slack, and I can tell you, Slack just works. AND if Google gets its head out of its messaging crap, it would be loads better than Microsoft. I mean I have about a few ideas that would be game changers if Google just would ask me.
Your post points out the problem Microsoft actually has. They have two separate and distinct products that kinda sit in the same area. Its confusion and muddled messaging. Exactly the opposite considering they are messaging apps.