BBC Answers.. "It was the Politically Correct Move. We really couldn't see any other way past being Politically Correct. blah blah blah blah... principles"
Trust me when I say this, Apple iPhones aren't all that special. Given the "Ingress" test is the most brutal of "Performance" testing, iPhones do not perform all that much better than similarly equipped Android phones.
The iPhone people I know do not spend significant amounts of time on screen, except when watching movies.
If your post was sarcasm, it was lost somewhere the moment I believed it. I've seen enough Leftwing bullshit to believe you meant it. If you aren't a left wing, then I apologize, and you should have put a disclaimer that it was sarcasm, and not real.
People like you trying to sound "progressive" but you end up just sounding like a douchebag. Which I am sure works well in the Echo Chamber that allowed Hillary to lose against probably the second worst candidate ever. And when Donald Trump isn't nearly as bad as you keep saying he is, it will simply be that the smarter ones will see how stupid posts like this actually sound, and you'll lose even more. So, Keep it up.
I don't measure via "left vs right" which is purely subjective and relativistic.
I have said that I am so far to the right, that I am coming up on your left.
Personally, I measure things in the form of Liberty. If you are arguing against me, you're arguing against Liberty. Which is fine, if tyranny is what you're really fighting for. Here is my view in a nutshell.
All humans have innate value, and their rights stem from that innate (Endowed by their Creator) value. These rights should apply to everyone equally (all men are created equal). True Liberty requires everyone to honor and respect all people at this level, an allow "self determination". AND That is where "rights" are derived .
There are other values people have, based on ability. Athletes are more athletic. Smart people are smarter. Some people work harder than others. Some people are born richer / poorer. These values are such that makes life "unfair" by default. However you cannot take from one, to give to another based on these "unfair" values without violating the primary values as a human and those "inalienable" rights mentioned in the previous paragraph. And that is the folly of progressives and left wingers.
Mixing these two things up, "results based" rights and rights that are inalienable are common, because people don't actually value Liberty any longer, they only value equal outcomes (from each according to ability, to each according to needs). I dare say you cannot have equal outcomes, without extreme tyrannical government "spreading the wealth around"
Calling people bigots is probably the weakest form of debate. It basically says "I can't argue on the merits, so I am going to call you names"
I am sure that works in your circles, but in mine, there are plenty of voices that do not conform to your viewpoint. It is funny how a black man is called a Nazi and Clansman by people like you. Which really shows who is the bigot.
Well, IMHO (being a Libertarian) I would have let the banks fail. Additionally, I would have locked up the CxO of banks that were practicing fraud, or otherwise weren't doing their do diligence in protecting the assets under their leadership. Heck, I would also go after the Board of Directors.
Well there are two parties in the US that dominate. The media is pretty much aligned with one or the other. Most are aligned (D) and Fox is more or less aligned with (R).
If the Media/News were reporting actual "news" (like WikiLeaks dribble) Hillary would have lost by a lot more.
Actually, I do. It is called... the "First Amendment". I realize that "this is not my country" types might not like certain anti-tyranny Amendments to the constitution, but there it is.
Slashdot Mirror
Because RUSSIA!!!!!
and TRUMP!!!!!!
Read the whole article. Interesting bit.
The only thing I can think of, is the Left has Streisand Effected the "alt-right" I knew nothing about them until the left told me about them.
"first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win" - Mahatma Gandhi.
Guess which stage the left is on this?
BBC Answers .. "It was the Politically Correct Move. We really couldn't see any other way past being Politically Correct. blah blah blah blah ... principles"
Define "alt-right" in such a way that isn't propaganda coming from the left.
What exactly does the "alt-right" believe. Who is its leader? Who funds it?
My guess, it is the new "Racist!" cry from retards who can't actually articulate what they themselves stand for.
Trust me when I say this, Apple iPhones aren't all that special. Given the "Ingress" test is the most brutal of "Performance" testing, iPhones do not perform all that much better than similarly equipped Android phones.
The iPhone people I know do not spend significant amounts of time on screen, except when watching movies.
If your post was sarcasm, it was lost somewhere the moment I believed it. I've seen enough Leftwing bullshit to believe you meant it. If you aren't a left wing, then I apologize, and you should have put a disclaimer that it was sarcasm, and not real.
You're assuming you're actually better than a cockroach, when in fact, you are just the same. Except I believe cockroaches will outlive humans.
Which is what people are saying about us now. That we are artificial constructs in some big super computer.
So ... Inception ?
People like you trying to sound "progressive" but you end up just sounding like a douchebag. Which I am sure works well in the Echo Chamber that allowed Hillary to lose against probably the second worst candidate ever. And when Donald Trump isn't nearly as bad as you keep saying he is, it will simply be that the smarter ones will see how stupid posts like this actually sound, and you'll lose even more. So, Keep it up.
I don't measure via "left vs right" which is purely subjective and relativistic.
I have said that I am so far to the right, that I am coming up on your left.
Personally, I measure things in the form of Liberty. If you are arguing against me, you're arguing against Liberty. Which is fine, if tyranny is what you're really fighting for. Here is my view in a nutshell.
All humans have innate value, and their rights stem from that innate (Endowed by their Creator) value. These rights should apply to everyone equally (all men are created equal). True Liberty requires everyone to honor and respect all people at this level, an allow "self determination". AND That is where "rights" are derived .
There are other values people have, based on ability. Athletes are more athletic. Smart people are smarter. Some people work harder than others. Some people are born richer / poorer. These values are such that makes life "unfair" by default. However you cannot take from one, to give to another based on these "unfair" values without violating the primary values as a human and those "inalienable" rights mentioned in the previous paragraph. And that is the folly of progressives and left wingers.
Mixing these two things up, "results based" rights and rights that are inalienable are common, because people don't actually value Liberty any longer, they only value equal outcomes (from each according to ability, to each according to needs). I dare say you cannot have equal outcomes, without extreme tyrannical government "spreading the wealth around"
Calling people bigots is probably the weakest form of debate. It basically says "I can't argue on the merits, so I am going to call you names"
I am sure that works in your circles, but in mine, there are plenty of voices that do not conform to your viewpoint. It is funny how a black man is called a Nazi and Clansman by people like you. Which really shows who is the bigot.
Actually, if that was the Easter Egg, that would be absolutely hilarious.
Law Enforcement (at least once) has tried to go after WAZE, for "Stealing" revenue.
Well, IMHO (being a Libertarian) I would have let the banks fail. Additionally, I would have locked up the CxO of banks that were practicing fraud, or otherwise weren't doing their do diligence in protecting the assets under their leadership. Heck, I would also go after the Board of Directors.
Or maybe the world's view of "center" is fucked up.Because if your idea of "center" is Liberal Socialist ... what is right? Barely socialist?
As opposed to getting their news from .. comedy channel like the whiny children rioting in the streets today?
Look, there is a likely reason for her lack of anything on the Campaign Trail, as it might have killed her, with her health issues.
And everyone saying she was "healthy" is pretty much taking her word for it (and ignoring every piece of evidence to the contrary).
Well there are two parties in the US that dominate. The media is pretty much aligned with one or the other. Most are aligned (D) and Fox is more or less aligned with (R).
If the Media/News were reporting actual "news" (like WikiLeaks dribble) Hillary would have lost by a lot more.
When Government agency fails, or is wasteful, what happens? "Hey, lets toss more money at the problem"
When Private entity fails, it goes away, and is either replaced or is no longer needed. Waste is generally frowned upon.
NOW Marginalized ..
I can't blame Autocorrect either :-/
Streisand Effect is in full play now. People I've never heard about because they have already been mainly marginalized are not FRONT PAGE of Slashdot.
Excellent work there.
The world is full of hypocrites. It is just now we see how fucking hypocritical the left can be.
Probably ____________ supports
Assuming an attacker has access to the computer's console
If the attacker has access to the system they have too much access.
you also don't have a right to offend people
Actually, I do. It is called ... the "First Amendment". I realize that "this is not my country" types might not like certain anti-tyranny Amendments to the constitution, but there it is.