It's very probable. But since we also know that the Periodic Table of Elements is universal, as well as the fundamental forces, we also know things like warp drive are just not feasible...
So they are over there, and we are here. End of story.
We know what animals are out there, you will never get better transportation than a horse. Making your own energy is just not feasible, even the technological wonder that is a boat are at the mercy of the wind and elements, far beyond man's control.
So if the pres can't say "hey guys, make a plan in case this happens" then what's the point of one? Just a 6 month national distraction every 4 years to pour heaps and heaps of money down a black hole for someone who is apparently "the most powerful person" in the world" yet they can't actually do shit?
I'm pretty sure practically every soldier has the skills and equipment to deal with this particular problem. Maybe they might have to figure it out on the fly but it would only take a couple before soldiers start shooting down any small drones they see hovering around a war zone and not picking them up to take back to base, just like anything else that is potentially booby trapped which is basically anything.
That is why you don't hear of these horror stories of "I had to train my replacement" in the UK - we simply don't have to do that.
Also our companies for the most part aren't farming out work to cheap foreign labour on the basis that locals can't do the work even though they are doing it and have to train the people that are apparently more capable of said work, all while having to pay them the same anyway because that makes no fucking sense. As I understand it that's pretty much the h1b situation. If I'm wrong please correct me.
That's because you're expecting a Nokia, and that would be a reasonable assumption if it was a Nokia but it'll be some cheaply made foxcon thing with the word nokia on it. Hopefully it will have a jack though.
After selling the name to microsoft, now this anyone who would choose a nokia because it's a nokia based off nokia's past heyday will know to steer clear because it will just be a piece of shit with the word nokia written on.
So basically you are saying that the NASA people (who actually have been in space) did the basic key concept of their study wrong, and you (who have never been in space) figured it out.
Space nutters, eh? Don't they know that you have it all figured out already and the conclusion is fuck space.
We can prove the Earth is not flat.
But, how can you prove something has never been seen? And where's the proof that we aren't in a simulation? As soon as you got proof or even later a restore from an earlier snapshot would undo your work.
Same place as the proof that I'm not really a space baby and you're all part of my dreams and when I wake up I'll go back to munching on stars. You can't prove a negative.
Why does it have to be a mac to learn on, could she not learn on a pc or do girls need a pretty mac before they'll sit down in front of it? I don't think that's true though.
If the answer is no, that means that you can conclusively prove that gods don't exist. Since gods by their very definition cannot be proven to exist or not exist, the answer must be yes.
And this comes from an atheist.
Sounds more like something an agnostic would say. Atheism isn't a religion because it has no structure or anything really. Whether god actually exists or not isn't really relevant to that.
So they install net/catcher/whatever things to scoop up all the rubbish, then what? Pick it all up and bring it to a landfill? Burn it? Contain it in a smaller section of ocean? It's all so well and good saying let's clean up the ocean but what do you do with the stuff after that?
Slashdot Mirror
step into my office
Isn't that that Johnson guy
If you don't war a nuclear war vote trump according to putin
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/13...
Must be a shill from Big Space
I wonder how many many millenia must pass for realistic posts like yours to not be modded at 0
The same amount that it will take to login to an account.
It's very probable. But since we also know that the Periodic Table of Elements is universal, as well as the fundamental forces, we also know things like warp drive are just not feasible...
So they are over there, and we are here. End of story.
We know what animals are out there, you will never get better transportation than a horse. Making your own energy is just not feasible, even the technological wonder that is a boat are at the mercy of the wind and elements, far beyond man's control.
How much more probable is Alien life now?
Practically guaranteed, but the possible places they might be just exploded exponentially.
until Obama is no longer president. He will be a giant black spot on our nation's history and will not be remembered fondly.
When he's going to be followed by hilldog or trump you shouldn't want to let him go.
So if the pres can't say "hey guys, make a plan in case this happens" then what's the point of one? Just a 6 month national distraction every 4 years to pour heaps and heaps of money down a black hole for someone who is apparently "the most powerful person" in the world" yet they can't actually do shit?
Jobs a good'un
I can get twice as many A.I. programs to look at me for free, as opposed to your cartel-controlled ass.
And they'll all tell you cancer when what you really need is a good fart.
Well, surely you still can. If some places use 1 less key they just have a blank, simple.
I'm pretty sure practically every soldier has the skills and equipment to deal with this particular problem. Maybe they might have to figure it out on the fly but it would only take a couple before soldiers start shooting down any small drones they see hovering around a war zone and not picking them up to take back to base, just like anything else that is potentially booby trapped which is basically anything.
It may happen, just not on any scale that gets reported. Our workers just get fucked in other ways like zero hour contracts and such.
That is why you don't hear of these horror stories of "I had to train my replacement" in the UK - we simply don't have to do that.
Also our companies for the most part aren't farming out work to cheap foreign labour on the basis that locals can't do the work even though they are doing it and have to train the people that are apparently more capable of said work, all while having to pay them the same anyway because that makes no fucking sense. As I understand it that's pretty much the h1b situation. If I'm wrong please correct me.
I'm here to tell you, in three million years you'll be dead.
Will I really? Well what do you suggest? Give up white bread? More rougage?
That's because you're expecting a Nokia, and that would be a reasonable assumption if it was a Nokia but it'll be some cheaply made foxcon thing with the word nokia on it. Hopefully it will have a jack though.
After selling the name to microsoft, now this anyone who would choose a nokia because it's a nokia based off nokia's past heyday will know to steer clear because it will just be a piece of shit with the word nokia written on.
So basically you are saying that the NASA people (who actually have been in space) did the basic key concept of their study wrong, and you (who have never been in space) figured it out.
Space nutters, eh? Don't they know that you have it all figured out already and the conclusion is fuck space.
We can prove the Earth is not flat. But, how can you prove something has never been seen? And where's the proof that we aren't in a simulation? As soon as you got proof or even later a restore from an earlier snapshot would undo your work.
Same place as the proof that I'm not really a space baby and you're all part of my dreams and when I wake up I'll go back to munching on stars. You can't prove a negative.
Why does it have to be a mac to learn on, could she not learn on a pc or do girls need a pretty mac before they'll sit down in front of it? I don't think that's true though.
Not unless their black, women, Asian, gay, transgender, etc.
Not unless their black, women, Asian, gay, transgender, etc what?
Is atheism a religion ?
If the answer is no, that means that you can conclusively prove that gods don't exist. Since gods by their very definition cannot be proven to exist or not exist, the answer must be yes. And this comes from an atheist.
Sounds more like something an agnostic would say. Atheism isn't a religion because it has no structure or anything really. Whether god actually exists or not isn't really relevant to that.
Isn't there already a New England? It would have to be New New England.
So they install net/catcher/whatever things to scoop up all the rubbish, then what? Pick it all up and bring it to a landfill? Burn it? Contain it in a smaller section of ocean? It's all so well and good saying let's clean up the ocean but what do you do with the stuff after that?