Float some lines up 10000 m on weather balloon-type contraptions and pipe them directly into your otherwise sealed tube. The atmosphere up there is 1/3rd of sea level, and that trend is linear enough that this would probably work over most land masses. If you're using maglev for propulsion and suspension, the only purpose the vacuum is serving is friction reduction, so any little bit would help.
You're talking about tubes that are hundreds of miles long and cars that are maybe a mile long, needing only to carry enough _air_, not oxygen, to survive the trip plus excess for the car itself. If all of that were released into a giant tube at once, and all 18% of it that is oxygen went right out the window with it, that newly polluted vacuum would be about as flammable as cured wet concrete.
Unplug everything critical. If you owe your life to it, it's worth needing to be physically present to make it work rather than risking vulnerability over a network. Then just make sure only people you want have physical access. Electronic warfare is simple to defend against, so far, it just takes a little foresight to realize that being fat, lazy, happy, and dead is worse than being a little busier, happy, and alive.
"... and other sugary drinks," makes me curious about what this bill might evolve into decades down the road. Are we eventually going to be OK with cranberry juice, but not pineapple or apple juice, due to sugar content?
Also, regarding the "tax more for more unhealthy people if we're doing universal healthcare" argument (which I agree with in part), why not just require a standard health assessment that everyone has to take to get care, and assign costs based on the outcome of those tests? It's more or less what we have now with private care, except there's at least one player in the field not (as) interested in profit margin.
They seem to forget that it is the consumer than "wants" the shows, and their job to deliver what the consumer wants, not what they think the consumer wants.
I would contend that it is indeed the consumer that wants the shows, but it is the suppliers job to make their customers happy, which, dollar for dollar, means they need to pay more attention to making advertisers happy than consumers.
I don't like the result, but consumer happiness has only become relevant in a world where there's somewhere else for the consumer to go, because they're merely a commodity that cable companies peddle to advertisers.
I'm glad you're paying attention to what your chosen president has been doing in office, however, it bothers me that in your synopsis you haven't considered Obama's approval of NDAA without removal of its unconstitutional segments. I suppose if you still trust him, the next natural course of action is to remove term limits so no one you don't trust gets into office with that law in effect. I for one cannot vote for him again even while I can agree that the positives you listed above are excellent. The assaults to our freedoms he has allowed the US government to make in the last four years (particularly the passing of NDAA) are too much for my liking, and will be voting for another candidate for president and for legislative representation.
Having responded to many wrecks of various cars in various states of being destroyed, you learn the variation that is in front of you. You're trained to know the difference between an electric, hybrid, or gas/diesel car, and you're trained to look for airbags in modern cars (taking the roof off? don't cut through an undetonated curtain airbag cylinder!). If you know what to look for (and first responders are trained in this), it's pretty easy to be able to see where it's safe to cut with the jaws and where you need to steer clear. Furthermore, there's a compounding factor in car design that reduces the electrical hazard to first responder crews: collapseable steering columns. If someone is pinned by the steering wheel, you may have to cut the lower frame of the car at the base of the A pillars to literally bend the car in half (the steering wheel moves with the front wheel/frame/engine assembly, so you bend that away from the trapped occupant, giving more room). However, this situation is less likely now than it was with non-collapseable steering columns (you're more likely to be able to just pull/bend the busted column away from the person without cutting the chassis). They're not going to put EV electrical conduits in the doors or upper parts of the frame (that's just extra wiring; the power's going to the wheels after all), so that's about the only time you'd be in trouble for an extrication. tl;dr: The way cars are made now this risk is low in the first place, and the first responders know what to look out for to keep themselves safe.
It's actually the other way around. They're designing the robot to put identical physical inputs into hardware that humans would. This allows them to test said hardware (like a chemical suit, for example) in real, hazardous environments, and to stress that hardware in ways it would be stressed in the real world, but without putting a human test subject's life at risk.
So, you've applied power to a heat pump to extract heat from the cold side (where your CPU is) to the hot side. Now you have a hot side that needs something to do with all that heat, or your system will run away. You cannot cool a spacecraft without off-gassing, evaporating, sublimating, or radiating, period.
The Shuttle landing gear is spring/gravity deployed with a pyro backup...
... that fired on every single landing ever done by any space shuttle, since not getting the gear down falls in the way-not-good category for crew survival. You're right that they were technically a "backup," but they weren't contingency based, they fired every time.
For starters, they had no business putting the shuttle on the side of the first stage. It should have been on the top from the start. That simple design change would have saved us a shuttle.
Well, it _was_ on the top from the start. Then budgets got cut, structures had to be lightened, and the only way to make the damn thing go up at all was to put it on the side. The amount of smug coming from your post should at least align with the amount of fact contained therein. Reference: Chris C. Kraft.
If the space shuttle landing gears were deployed pneumatically they wouldn't be the space shuttle landing gears. While there is redundancy in the system, they're actually pyrotechnically actuated. Explosions are still the most reliable way to actuate anything because all that needs to happen is to manufacture a part correctly, not damage it/make it damage tolerant, and then release potential energy. Likely any landing gear needed for a spacecraft such as the Falcon would be similarly actuated, as there is no reason for retraction to occur outside of preparation for its next launch.
Slashdot Mirror
DOS 5 -> Win 3.0 -> Win 3.1 -> Win95 -> Win98 -> WinXP -> Ubuntu 5.04 -> Ubuntu 5.10 -> Ubuntu 6.04 -> Elive 0.9 -> Pardus -> CentOS -> PCLinuxOS -> Mandriva -> Fedora -> Win7 -> Arch -> Ubuntu 12.04
Float some lines up 10000 m on weather balloon-type contraptions and pipe them directly into your otherwise sealed tube. The atmosphere up there is 1/3rd of sea level, and that trend is linear enough that this would probably work over most land masses. If you're using maglev for propulsion and suspension, the only purpose the vacuum is serving is friction reduction, so any little bit would help.
You're talking about tubes that are hundreds of miles long and cars that are maybe a mile long, needing only to carry enough _air_, not oxygen, to survive the trip plus excess for the car itself. If all of that were released into a giant tube at once, and all 18% of it that is oxygen went right out the window with it, that newly polluted vacuum would be about as flammable as cured wet concrete.
Get the scientists working on the tube technology immediately.
Unplug everything critical. If you owe your life to it, it's worth needing to be physically present to make it work rather than risking vulnerability over a network. Then just make sure only people you want have physical access. Electronic warfare is simple to defend against, so far, it just takes a little foresight to realize that being fat, lazy, happy, and dead is worse than being a little busier, happy, and alive.
Nah, it's clearly documented that that was done by Islamic terrorists.
"... and other sugary drinks," makes me curious about what this bill might evolve into decades down the road. Are we eventually going to be OK with cranberry juice, but not pineapple or apple juice, due to sugar content?
Also, regarding the "tax more for more unhealthy people if we're doing universal healthcare" argument (which I agree with in part), why not just require a standard health assessment that everyone has to take to get care, and assign costs based on the outcome of those tests? It's more or less what we have now with private care, except there's at least one player in the field not (as) interested in profit margin.
They seem to forget that it is the consumer than "wants" the shows, and their job to deliver what the consumer wants, not what they think the consumer wants.
I would contend that it is indeed the consumer that wants the shows, but it is the suppliers job to make their customers happy, which, dollar for dollar, means they need to pay more attention to making advertisers happy than consumers.
I don't like the result, but consumer happiness has only become relevant in a world where there's somewhere else for the consumer to go, because they're merely a commodity that cable companies peddle to advertisers.
I'm glad you're paying attention to what your chosen president has been doing in office, however, it bothers me that in your synopsis you haven't considered Obama's approval of NDAA without removal of its unconstitutional segments. I suppose if you still trust him, the next natural course of action is to remove term limits so no one you don't trust gets into office with that law in effect. I for one cannot vote for him again even while I can agree that the positives you listed above are excellent. The assaults to our freedoms he has allowed the US government to make in the last four years (particularly the passing of NDAA) are too much for my liking, and will be voting for another candidate for president and for legislative representation.
WHOOP-sidaisy
$1 only in coins? Go to strip club. Make it hail.
Alaska can come too?
Having responded to many wrecks of various cars in various states of being destroyed, you learn the variation that is in front of you. You're trained to know the difference between an electric, hybrid, or gas/diesel car, and you're trained to look for airbags in modern cars (taking the roof off? don't cut through an undetonated curtain airbag cylinder!). If you know what to look for (and first responders are trained in this), it's pretty easy to be able to see where it's safe to cut with the jaws and where you need to steer clear. Furthermore, there's a compounding factor in car design that reduces the electrical hazard to first responder crews: collapseable steering columns. If someone is pinned by the steering wheel, you may have to cut the lower frame of the car at the base of the A pillars to literally bend the car in half (the steering wheel moves with the front wheel/frame/engine assembly, so you bend that away from the trapped occupant, giving more room). However, this situation is less likely now than it was with non-collapseable steering columns (you're more likely to be able to just pull/bend the busted column away from the person without cutting the chassis). They're not going to put EV electrical conduits in the doors or upper parts of the frame (that's just extra wiring; the power's going to the wheels after all), so that's about the only time you'd be in trouble for an extrication. tl;dr: The way cars are made now this risk is low in the first place, and the first responders know what to look out for to keep themselves safe.
An enema from an 11 time pro-bowler and NFL hall-of-famer would definitely be B A D.
It's actually the other way around. They're designing the robot to put identical physical inputs into hardware that humans would. This allows them to test said hardware (like a chemical suit, for example) in real, hazardous environments, and to stress that hardware in ways it would be stressed in the real world, but without putting a human test subject's life at risk.
lol
So, you've applied power to a heat pump to extract heat from the cold side (where your CPU is) to the hot side. Now you have a hot side that needs something to do with all that heat, or your system will run away. You cannot cool a spacecraft without off-gassing, evaporating, sublimating, or radiating, period.
That explains the drivers down here on I-10, slowest I've ever seen on an interstate.
The Shuttle landing gear is spring/gravity deployed with a pyro backup...
... that fired on every single landing ever done by any space shuttle, since not getting the gear down falls in the way-not-good category for crew survival. You're right that they were technically a "backup," but they weren't contingency based, they fired every time.
Your idea needs a new island... I don't think there are any Hawaiians too keen on putting much of anything on the big island.
For starters, they had no business putting the shuttle on the side of the first stage. It should have been on the top from the start. That simple design change would have saved us a shuttle.
Well, it _was_ on the top from the start. Then budgets got cut, structures had to be lightened, and the only way to make the damn thing go up at all was to put it on the side. The amount of smug coming from your post should at least align with the amount of fact contained therein. Reference: Chris C. Kraft.
If the space shuttle landing gears were deployed pneumatically they wouldn't be the space shuttle landing gears. While there is redundancy in the system, they're actually pyrotechnically actuated. Explosions are still the most reliable way to actuate anything because all that needs to happen is to manufacture a part correctly, not damage it/make it damage tolerant, and then release potential energy. Likely any landing gear needed for a spacecraft such as the Falcon would be similarly actuated, as there is no reason for retraction to occur outside of preparation for its next launch.
Championship mule breeding rights?
"... GW Bush ...." "...1999...."
trollface.jpg
Guilty until proven innocent in Texas? How so?