Slashdot Mirror


Obama Pushes For Cheaper Pennies

Hugh Pickens writes "Time Magazine reports that hidden deep inside in the White House's $3.8 trillion, 2,000-page budget that was sent to Congress this week is a proposal to make pennies and nickels cheaper to produce. Why? Because it currently costs the federal government 2.4 cents to make a penny and 11.2 cents for every nickel. If passed, the budget would allow the Treasury Department to 'change the composition of coins to more cost-effective materials' resulting in changes that could save more than $100 million a year. Since 1982, our copper-looking pennies have been merely coppery. In the 1970s, the price of copper soared, so President Nixon proposed changing the penny's composition to a cheaper aluminum. Today, only 2.5% of a penny is copper (which makes up the coin's coating) while 97.5% is zinc. The mint did make steel pennies for one year — in 1943 — when copper was needed for the war effort and steel might be a cheaper alternative this time. What about the bill introduced in 2006 that the US abandon pennies altogether.? At the time, fifty-five percent of respondents considered the penny useful compared to 43 percent who agreed it should be eliminated. More telling, 76 percent of respondents said they would pick up a penny if they saw it on the ground."

825 comments

  1. You can't eliminate them by netwarerip · · Score: 5, Funny

    The vast majority if store clerks wouldn't be able to round up or down to the nearest nickel.

    1. Re:You can't eliminate them by rioki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh no we can't have 9.99$! I am so confused if I see 9.95$...

    2. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, this is America after all.

    3. Re:You can't eliminate them by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      The registers could do the math for them.

      I think we should kill everything except the quarter. Everything else is just a nuisance. I can't tell you the last time I bought something that cost less than a quarter in a quantity of one.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:You can't eliminate them by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

      They already round up or down to the nearest penny thanks to %tax and 99/100ths pennies making most transactions end with fractional penny amounts.

      A nickel wouldn't require any extra though or skill.

      Besides, few clerks operate without a computer that does the rounding calculations for them.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    5. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A couple years ago I ate lunch with my coworkers at a chain restaurant. One of my coworkers and I had exactly the same meal. Ice tea and a burger. My bill was $7.92 and his was $7.91. If we are going to eliminate pennies we need to clearly define conditions of rounding. Some companies are taking liberties with their rounding software.

    6. Re:You can't eliminate them by chromas · · Score: 2

      Some states have sales tax, so that $9.95 becomes $10.74 (depending on the tax rate, of course).

    7. Re:You can't eliminate them by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Round here we have a toll booth with coin baskets thats: 40 cents.
      That's right - you need at least a quarter, a dime AND a nickle.
      Not 50 cents. Not 25 cents. FOURTY.

      I'm sure a lot of out of towners just toss in two quarters and have a chuckle at the local chuckleheaded government's tricks.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    8. Re:You can't eliminate them by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Informative

      In other countries this is solved by laws demanding that all prices advertised to individuals (as opposed to companies) or where the target customer is clearly an individual include sales tax. So prices including the sales tax are conveniently set to nice round numbers.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    9. Re:You can't eliminate them by QuasiSteve · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, there's no problem with having $9.99 .

      In Europe we've all but done away with the 1 and 2 eurocent coins - their monetary value vs cost involved in handling them just didn't make sense.

      But we do still have e.g. â0.99 type prices. The way it works is that your total gets rounded at most placed and almost certainly if you decide to pay by debit card. So if you buy 3 of those â0.99 items, you get a total of â2.97, rounded to â2.95. If you buy two, it gets rounded up and you pay â2.00 instead of the â1.98.
      ( this is apparently called 'Swedish rounding' when specifically applied to the situation of currency: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_rounding )

      However, if you want to pay with 1 or 2 eurocent coins to match a price exactly, many places will still accept that - but if you pay 'just over' where your return would technically be 1 or 2 eurocent, you won't be getting those.

      The places that accept them bring them to the bank, which bring them to bigger banks, which basically have them destroyed - and gradually the 1 and 2 eurocent coins are removed from circulation.

    10. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      other countries have nationwide sales tax regulations so that you still could use nationwide ads.

      --
      bickerdyke
    11. Re:You can't eliminate them by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      geeze I got those all mixed up in my head.. if you pay by debit card you do almost certainly do not pay the rounded number.

      Also, why did Slashdot kill my euro symbols? Geez.

    12. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 1 or 2 eurocents here in Portugal works just fine...

    13. Re:You can't eliminate them by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In which case you pay $10.75 (if you pay with cash).

      The penny is currently worth less (in terms of what it can buy) than the half-cent was when it was junked in 1857, it's worse than useless at the moment.

    14. Re:You can't eliminate them by John3 · · Score: 2

      I think a hardware store is the only place you can actually buy something for less than a quarter. In my hardware store we sell loose fasteners, and we'll have customers buy two washers for .07 each. We've considered putting a minimum of .25 for a fastener purchase but I think customers get a kick out of buying something for so little. The standard line the customer gives at the checkout is "Guess you can go home now" after we ring up the .14 sale.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    15. Re:You can't eliminate them by hobarrera · · Score: 2

      In some countries (including where I live), the law says that the amount should *always* be rounded in favour of the customer. for up to $0.05 difference.

    16. Re:You can't eliminate them by Endo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not at all. You do all the math as normal, then round the final value. We already do that and have for decades. There's plenty of times where the price with sales tax doesn't come out to an even cent.

      And FWIW, I won't pick up a penny off the floor. Or if I do, it's usually to throw it in the garbage because it's cluttering things up.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    17. Re:You can't eliminate them by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      The vast majority if store clerks wouldn't be able to round up or down to the nearest nickel.

      Because they had such problems with that when the mill $0.001 and the half cent $0.005 were removed that we learned our lesson and are stuck with a coin worth more in scrap metal if it wasn't illegal to scrap them. As a side note when the Mill and half were taken out of circulation they had more buying power then a nickle

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    18. Re:You can't eliminate them by devent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Germany we pretty much get 1 and 2 Cent coins. I don't know what countries are try to get rid of them.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    19. Re:You can't eliminate them by chromas · · Score: 2

      We have a lot of $0.99, $1.95, $9.98 bullshit, which I guess is supposed to make the price seem lower ("$0.99? That's not even a dollar!"—I assume that works on people who set their clocks 20 minute ahead so they're on time); rounding would ruin that.

    20. Re:You can't eliminate them by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      Damned, I wasted my mod points on another thread. Sad, because this is the first time I've heard a good argument on this side of the subject.
      (I don't agree with the principle, but for once someone has something clever to say about it...)

    21. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, why did Slashdot kill my euro symbols? Geez.

      I find it funny that people still get caught by this, does nobody even read the comments anymore?

      You need the html entity € -> €

      Of course, it could accept the binary input that was given to it, but there is no guarantee that the end user computer will be able to interpret slashdots interpretation of binary data as what the original submitter intended it to be..

    22. Re:You can't eliminate them by Plunky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I heard of this before; the chain restaurant doesn't want to take the hit when rounding down, so they just add the fractions to the next bill and hope nobody notices or cares. The US method of listing raw price then adding sales tax after (do they do this in fast food places?) means that this is difficult for customers to detect..

    23. Re:You can't eliminate them by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      When you are talking about a 0.12% error, that is in the range of fixed point and half precision floating point math errors due to different OOPs.

      No standard or defined conditions of rounding will fix that.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    24. Re:You can't eliminate them by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      The ad says $9.99 plus sales tax which they often say anyway and tags used within the store are printed locally. It is doable but no store would consider it unless it's forced on them which I suspect the government does no want. It's easier to hide sale tax spikes from people when they can see up front that the cost has risen.

    25. Re:You can't eliminate them by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      The vast majority if store clerks wouldn't be able to round up or down to the nearest nickel.

      The vast majority of store clerks don't add up your total themselves, anyway.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    26. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in other countries the cash register automatically does the rounding as an extra +/- line item. for example, in malaysia to the nearest .05 ringgit.

    27. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe we've all but done away with the 1 and 2 eurocent coins

      No, we have not. Personally I insist on getting exact change, particularly because I don't like the psychological games that merchants try to play. If the price is 0.99, then playing that game will cost you the time to hand me that cent. If you want to charge 1 Euro, then don't lie about it on the sticker.

    28. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      So in other words you screw the people using cash (which over here are mostly either poor people or people concerned about privacy or distrust the banking sector)?

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    29. Re:You can't eliminate them by thedonger · · Score: 1

      Who would want to shop at $1.06 Heaven? Sounds way more expensive than that other place - 99 Cent Heaven.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    30. Re:You can't eliminate them by dkf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      other countries have nationwide sales tax regulations so that you still could use nationwide ads.

      So? An ad can easily carry a disclaimer (in small text if preferred) that prices in store will be higher due to taxes. What's infuriating is when you go to, say, a food store that is advertising a price on a blackboard for something and where you're charged more than that when you actually try to buy the item because of taxes. It's not that the staff in the store couldn't put the price inclusive of tax up; it's only advertising to people in that particular store and it's just a blackboard that they rewrite every day or two anyway. (Anyone putting a store across a taxation boundary is going to be in for complex pain, but that's true even without the requirement to display true prices.)

      Show the real price so I can figure out how much cash to get out of my wallet. I don't really care what the store's cut of that is (or how much goes to their suppliers or their bank for their overdraft) and how much goes to the government, not by comparison with ensuring that I spend the right amount and only try to purchase goods and services that I have the money for.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    31. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't understand, maybe it's the cultural chasm between American and Europe, but what's wrong with paying a 40 cent charge with 4 dimes? I'm under the impression that a "dime" is equivalent to 10 cents, right? So 4 dimes would cover the "40 cent" toll charge. Why do you need all kinds of different coins, or even paying more than you're asked ("two quarters")? Are "dime" coins uncommon?

    32. Re:You can't eliminate them by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guys, listen, I have an idea! You won't believe it, guys! Guys?
      So, like, what if we just make coins with a value of $0.99? This way, you can directly pay $x.99-type prices and won't need pennies at all!

    33. Re:You can't eliminate them by gambino21 · · Score: 1

      Redesigning the penny and nickel to be cheaper to product seems like a complicated solution to a simple problem. Just eliminate both pennies and nickels and drop the last digit of prices.

    34. Re:You can't eliminate them by tomhath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, the American Retard Party says: "the federal government must be all powerful, we'll just eliminate those pesky state and local governments and control everything from Washington."

      Ever wonder why the country is called "The United States of America"? It's a federation of 50 separate states, like it or not. There's also a very good reason why the President and Vice President are elected by the Electoral College rather than popular vote (maybe you should read up on it some time).

    35. Re:You can't eliminate them by Custard+Horse · · Score: 2

      I recall going to Bulgaria in the mid 90s. There was a shortage of small coinage (which were in any event worth bugger all) and in your change you used to get small chocolates or chewing gum. I've encountered similar practices in other countries in Europe.

    36. Re:You can't eliminate them by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Brands could produce alternative forms of the same ad depending on state. That's more or less what happens in Europe where VAT is included in the price.

    37. Re:You can't eliminate them by ATMAvatar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Part of that is also carry-over from a past era where taxes were calculated based upon a stair-step-like system (at least in some states), rather than calculated exactly. $9.99 and $10.00 would be in two different brackets, resulting in a greater difference in sales tax than it is now, so it made a meaningful impact to drop the penny.

      Of course, it doesn't hurt that there was a psychological effect on the customer as well. That is likely why the practice continues.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    38. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      The mill was never an official US coin and if you look at the half cent, while it was officially discontinued, you saw its use in private tokens up until the great depression. In fact, the demand for 1/2 cent and 1/10 cent coins were so great in the great depression that the US government considered making official coins of those denominations, the plan ultimately fell through though. Until rampant inflation hit when tyrant-in-chief FDR took us off of the true gold standard and seized the nation's wealth for his own gain, half a cent was still a sizable amount of wealth.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    39. Re:You can't eliminate them by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The ad says $9.99 plus sales tax which they often say anyway and tags used within the store are printed locally. It is doable but no store would consider it unless it's forced on them which I suspect the government does no want. It's easier to hide sale tax spikes from people when they can see up front that the cost has risen.

      In their defence, IMHO they have a legitimate reason to do this- their locally-printed/local-only prices would appear more expensive against nationally-advertised prices that (as mentioned above) don't include sales tax because it varies across the US.

      Yes, maybe people should notice that the national price excludes sales tax and the local one doesn't, but in practice enough people won't that it puts the latter at a competitive disadvantage.

      (FWIW I live in the UK where consumer-oriented prices *are* usually quoted with VAT (i.e. sales tax) included and prefer it that way- but that's because we have uniform VAT across the country. I understand why the US doesn't include it.)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    40. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True. On Fridays like today, I get a bagel at the cafeteria here at work. It is always $1.24. I make a point to put 24 cents in my pocket in the morning so I can pay with exact change (I guess I am a bit on the obsessive side there). It would be easier for me if the price was just $1.25. No more grabbing 4 pennies and 2 dimes...

    41. Re:You can't eliminate them by nullchar · · Score: 2

      Sometimes the cash payer gains 2 cents! "you get a total of 2.97, rounded to 2.95"

      Paying electronically uses the exact amount.

      Problem with Americans is, they'll try very hard to make their total order gain 2 cents every time. (Both the buyer and the seller will play this game, at first.)

      Also, Australia no longer has the penny.

    42. Re:You can't eliminate them by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Informative

      In Europe we've all but done away with the 1 and 2 eurocent coins - their monetary value vs cost involved in handling them just didn't make sense.

      Clearly, you have no clue how things work in Europe. Please talk about what you know - namely your country - but do not try to expand your knowledge by thinking all European countries work the same. They don't.

    43. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do financial math with floating point numbers, you need to step away from the keyboard and let professionals do the programming.

    44. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, its the total that gets rounded so as long as you buy more than a few things at a time it evens out

    45. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      other countries have nationwide sales tax regulations so that you still could use nationwide ads.

      So? An ad can easily carry a disclaimer (in small text if preferred) that prices in store will be higher due to taxes.

      Aaaaaand you're out!
      That's exactly what you want to stop with regulations that ads for end-users have to show the final price.

      --
      bickerdyke
    46. Re:You can't eliminate them by hipp5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      not that the staff in the store couldn't put the price inclusive of tax up

      They can't. This is a consequence of the need to remain competetive. When we walk into stores we expect to see prices that don't include tax. A well-meaning store that tries to break from this and include tax in the price ends up looking way more expensive than its competetors, even though in reality it is not. Even if you include "taxes included!" on the sign there is a subconscious bias in the customer's mind against these seemingly high prices.

      No, until every store is forced to do the same and include taxes it won't work. It's an unfortunate consequence of human nature.

    47. Re:You can't eliminate them by dragonsomnolent · · Score: 4, Funny

      True story: There was a Schnuck's (St. Louis area wide grocery store) that was build in such a way that one part of the store was in the city of St. Louis, and the other part was in the county. St. Louis city has it's own sales tax on top of the state's. I felt very sorry for those accounting people...

      --
      I got nuthin
    48. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then businesses will be carefully pricing every item in order to fuck you out of as much of that $0.10 as they possibly can. All those factions of $0.10 will quickly add up to be multiple $ when purchases involving multiple items are made.

      Bottom line is it will cost more. It'll cost more when you go grocery shopping. It'll cost more when you go out to eat. It'll cost more when you fill up your gas tank. And it won't cost more because things actually cost more, it'll cost more because you gave businesses even more leeway to fuck the customer over than they already have now.

    49. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand, maybe it's the cultural chasm between American and Europe, but what's wrong with paying a 40 cent charge with 4 dimes? I'm under the impression that a "dime" is equivalent to 10 cents, right? So 4 dimes would cover the "40 cent" toll charge. Why do you need all kinds of different coins, or even paying more than you're asked ("two quarters")? Are "dime" coins uncommon?

      Not 'uncommon' like dollar or half dollar coins where you just don't get them often, but uncommon like 'I have a roll of quarters for tolls in the car', because most toll roads are in 25 cent increments, and thus you are unlikely to have them in the situation that you come up to a toll road in an unfamiliar stretch that has a $0.40 toll...

    50. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strictly speaking? Yes. In practice it doesn't actually matter.

    51. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Exactly, but speaking of Europe, you're talking of diferent countries. They need to have different ads for language reasons anyway. I was talking about nationwide ad campaigns, not continent wide.

      In Germany, e.g. how could you advertise a prize on TV if you had to give 16 different prices? Or ~60 for each french departement?

      You can't have both. regulations about end-prices in taxes and non-unified sales tax rules between states. (or whatever your country is composed from)

      --
      bickerdyke
    52. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise here in Ireland.
      If the Americans are so concerned about coinage costs, they should introduce 50c and $1 coins (not silver dollar, har har).
      Perhaps change that 25c (quarter) to a 20c? Oh and make the cheaper coin (nickel?) smaller than the one which is twice its value (dime?). Common sense, really.

    53. Re:You can't eliminate them by Bengie · · Score: 2

      Gas stations already go out to the 1/10th penny in precision. $3.499/gal. They'll just round up to the nearest smallest unit.

    54. Re:You can't eliminate them by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Merchants are allowed to include sales tax in their posted prices, just as they're allowed to set their prices to an even multiple of 5 cents.

      If merchants really didn't like pennies, there'd be no use for them. It's that simple. Apparently the value of psychological pricing is worth the cost of dealing with pennies, regardless of how they complain.

    55. Re:You can't eliminate them by similar_name · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is ok. Sometimes taxes go out to tenths of a penny but it doesn't cause any issues. Really we should drop the penny and the nickel. Just go the the next tenth; dimes. I believe there used to be mils that were tenths of a penny and we don't fret about it today.

    56. Re:You can't eliminate them by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 0

      "The vast majority if store clerks wouldn't be able to round up or down to the nearest nickel."

      They would, however, be able to spell "of" properly.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    57. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Portugal we use de 1 and 2 cent coins!

    58. Re:You can't eliminate them by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Not to mention comparing one stores taxed vs non-taxed is apples and oranges. I'm not going to normalize their prices to 5.5% tax in my head.

      Not only would people bias against higher listed prices, but against what's "normal". One could also say that 9.99 "looks" more appealing than some more random value like 9.87. We're accustomed to seeing x.99, x.95, x.75, x.50, x.25, x.1, x.00, etc.

    59. Re:You can't eliminate them by residieu · · Score: 1

      Even with even sales tax rates (5%) almost every sale results in fractional cents that need to be rounded. And there are many places with fractional tax rates (8.375%). Checkout software can be modified to round to nearest 5 or 10 cents rather than the current standard of rounding to 1 cent. (Would we round Credit transactions to 5 cents? I don't know)

    60. Re:You can't eliminate them by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      do they do this in fast food places?

      Yes, although they call it "preparation tax" instead of sales tax where I live, because food items are non-taxable, so they tax it as a service instead.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    61. Re:You can't eliminate them by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      Same in Portugal. I've never even heard of what the parent is saying unitl now.

    62. Re:You can't eliminate them by zidium · · Score: 2

      We already have 1 dollar coins, but no one ever uses them. Ever.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    63. Re:You can't eliminate them by Bengie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buy this car for under $14k! $13,999.99

      See, sales people do understand very basic Boolean logic.

      They actually wanted to do $13,999.99999999999~, but someone told them it was equal to $14k, so they could no longer claim it was less than. Their heads exploded.

    64. Re:You can't eliminate them by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or, as we say in America, "forty". You Brits and your crazy use of the letter "u"! "Colour" indeed!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    65. Re:You can't eliminate them by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Funny

      From Married ... With Children:

      Marcy: Steve, don't tell them about your insane quest to create the 99 cent coin.
      Steve: Al, I invented the 99 cent coin. Have you ever noticed how things cost $7.99? $14.99? $99.99? My coin will eliminate the messy change that only catches the attention of obnoxious beggars who hassle you on the way to your Mercedes. What do you think of it, Al?
      Al: What about tax?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    66. Re:You can't eliminate them by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      So is the Nickel. We should just round to the nearest dime instead.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    67. Re:You can't eliminate them by residieu · · Score: 1

      If you don't think little you always think logically about things like that, you're fooling yourself.

      I've set my alarm clock ahead at various points in my life, because I know I'm bad at doing the necessary math in the morning. And the later time does tend to shock me awake a little better

      I do find myself seeing $14.99 and thinking "14 dollars" not "15 dollars" sometimes. I can't say that it's ever tipped the balance and made a sale or not, but maybe it has

    68. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry buddy, you lost this argument 230 years ago. America would not be the #1 world power without the strong federal government. That's why we have the Constitution instead of the Articles of Confederation.

    69. Re:You can't eliminate them by lexa1979 · · Score: 1

      same here in Belgium, the price is the price...

    70. Re:You can't eliminate them by hobarrera · · Score: 2

      I once knew a man who bought a packet of cigarrettes in the same place every morning. He got his $0.02 change in candy.
      One day, when he had enough, he went to that same place, and bought a packet of cigarrettes with a bag full of candy.
      I always wondered if the clerk was amused, or angry at that.

    71. Re:You can't eliminate them by residieu · · Score: 1

      I bet we could do an experiment and prove that the penny is worth considerably less than the 1 cent printed on it. How many pennies do you have to give to someone to get them to trade a dollar for it? A quarter?

    72. Re:You can't eliminate them by residieu · · Score: 1

      Then we can introduce a one dollar coin that is easily distinguishable in size and/or shape from the quarter.

      A vote we do one with a hole in it, so we can string them on a cord and wear them around our necks

    73. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Round here we have a toll booth with coin baskets thats: 40 cents.
      That's right - you need at least a quarter, a dime AND a nickle.
      Not 50 cents. Not 25 cents. FOURTY.

      I'm sure a lot of out of towners just toss in two quarters and have a chuckle at the local chuckleheaded government's tricks.

      Huh? You think it's some sort of "trick" to have a 40 cent toll? What exactly is the "trick"?

    74. Re:You can't eliminate them by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Maybe it would be easier to issue a 99c note!

    75. Re:You can't eliminate them by residieu · · Score: 1

      That's still 4 coins though. And I have the vague impression that you end up with more quarter than dimes if you never spend your coins (can't say for sure)

      At one point there was a bridge nearby that had a toll of $4, so we had the same problem of needing 4 bills, or to wait to get change. They've raised the toll to $5 now, but I'm using EZ-Pass now so get to drive through without messing with cash.

    76. Re:You can't eliminate them by Tuan121 · · Score: 1

      Not in the UK. All tax is included in the price, but it's still £9.99 instead of £10.00 to attract people to a one digit price instead of two (ignoring the cents).

    77. Re:You can't eliminate them by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the transition wouldn't be smooth. There are people that just aren't going to think, don't watch the news or whatever but I have to admit I much prefer it when I can easily calculate out prices in my head. I lived in the US and UK and it's always easier to figure out what I'm spending here in the UK. So of course my person preference would be to see it. But then again I'm not in the US so it doesn't really matter to me.

      While I'm sure it's rare I have seen the a couple people moan about the cost at the till because it doesn't matter the flyer which is because the person is dense and the "plus sales tax" text is usually in microscopic text. There will always be stupid people and I think there could be some value in advertising with the tax. Shelf labels get printed and replaced more often than sales tax changes anyway.

    78. Re:You can't eliminate them by JDG1980 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The way to do this in the U.S. would be as follows:

      • Impose a 7% national sales tax, payable to the federal government. At the same time, prohibit states and localities from collecting their own sales taxes. The result would be largely revenue-neutral, since the total of state and local sales taxes averages about 7% already.
      • Have the federal government distribute this money on a regular basis to states (6%) and localities (1%), based on some weighted formula that takes into account population, economic activity, or both.
      • Require all merchants doing business in the U.S. to post prices inclusive of tax, so what you see is what you pay.

      This would have several advantages. It would eliminate the current advantages that online stores have over brick-and-mortar retailers. (Someone buying at Amazon or Newegg would pay a price with the 7% included, just like someone buying at B&N or Fry's.) It would make it easier for consumers to figure out how much something is actually going to cost them out-of-pocket. And you know what? If a business feels that the 99-cent or $4.99 or $9.99 or $99.99 price point is important, they'll figure out a way to reduce the cost of their product so it hits that price point even with tax already included. So, in the long run, it is likely to save consumers money.

    79. Re:You can't eliminate them by residieu · · Score: 1

      I feel bad wasting a cashier's time for such a small sale.

      The Home Despot has their screws and bolts sold in baggies of 4, so the minimum price is a little higher, but I still prefer to go through their auto-checkout for that sort of sale

    80. Re:You can't eliminate them by DanTheManMS · · Score: 1

      And fifty cent pieces too, though I see those in circulation less rarely than the dollar coins even.

    81. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sigh.

      Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution: Congress has the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, etc. FEDERAL.
      Article 1, Section 8 also contains the Commerce Clause, by which basis the FEDERAL government enacted (15 USC 45, and FTC regulations associated) laws and protections for consumers against false and misleading advertising.

      It would be trivial, and WHOLLY within the power of the Congress, to pass a law requiring that advertisements show the TRUE price of an item with associated taxes rather than the misleading pre-tax value.

      Maybe you should learn more about your country and government, rather than relying on the lies and misrepresentations that you're getting from Tea Retard pamphlets?

    82. Re:You can't eliminate them by mawe · · Score: 1

      What parallel world Europe do you come from? Earth-Two Europe?

      --
      I'm afraid Mary is dead.
    83. Re:You can't eliminate them by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ever wonder why the country is called "The United States of America"? It's a federation of 50 separate states, like it or not.

      It should be noted that before the Civil War, "United States" was plural - "these United States". Afterwards, it was singular - "the United States".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    84. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not an accounting problem, that's a legal problem.

      Which is usually solved by a local agreement.

    85. Re:You can't eliminate them by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry buddy, you lost this argument 230 years ago. America would not be the #1 world power without the strong federal government. That's why we have the Constitution instead of the Articles of Confederation.

      Two things: he lost the argument 150 years ago, when the Civil War was fought.

      And we didn't actually create a strong Federal government in order to become the #1 world power. We created it because the Articles of Confederation were essentially non-functional.

      Note that the Constitution creates a severely limited form of Federal government, basically preventing the individual States from acting like they were separate countries - the (nearly) all-powerful Federal government of today was never dreamed of by the Founders (well, maybe Hamilton was hoping we'd go that way - he thought we should have a King)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    86. Re:You can't eliminate them by mawe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in Germany, we pay the price as displayed, no matter how we pay. I actually expect that!

      Everything else seems stupid, not?

      --
      I'm afraid Mary is dead.
    87. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which part were the checkout counters in- would it have mattered? Could they have avoided the city tax altogether?

    88. Re:You can't eliminate them by Talderas · · Score: 1

      There's no need to involve the federal government in collection. Just mandating a flat sales tax rate and barring any other sales tax from being applied to purchases means that online retailers can easily calculate and disperse sales tax to the state governments without having to gut current tax collection systems or establish an entire new bureaucratic system.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    89. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Added bonus: no more counties/states saying "well we'll add an 0.1% sales tax to pay for Mr. Multibillionaire Asshole and his collection of multimillionaire thug asshole ball-tossers to have a stadium and yet still charge $75 a ticket for people to watch them throw a ball around."

    90. Re:You can't eliminate them by gambino21 · · Score: 1

      And then businesses will be carefully pricing every item in order to fuck you out of as much of that $0.10 as they possibly can. All those factions of $0.10 will quickly add up to be multiple $ when purchases involving multiple items are made.

      I don't really buy this argument. Yes, many businesses will round up the prices, so you might be paying up to 9 cents more than before for certain items. A few businesses might actually round down to compete, since the different between $1 at one store and $.9 dollars at another store is noticeable to the average customer. Obviously this will not have significant effect on big ticket items, a $500 TV is still $500 with or without the pennies. The place it could have more effect is on small items, for the average consumer, the best example is probably groceries. So let's say you buy 50 grocery items per week, and the price increased an average of 5 cents per item, that's $2.50 extra in your grocery bill. I would argue that's not that significant for most people. Taken over 1 year you pay about $130 than the previous year on groceries. The bottom line is that stores that try to jack up the price because of a change like this would likely be noticed by the customers. If you are suddenly paying 10-20% more for common items, you start to notice, and you might shop elsewhere.

      The other side you have to look at are the advanatges. So one less digit means less change you have to carry in your pocket, less change in the cash register, less cost for the government to make the pennies and nickels, etc. So, IMO, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

    91. Re:You can't eliminate them by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, but some of us (Oregon) have no sales tax, and definitely do not want one.

      What I see on the shelf is exactly what I pay.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    92. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 1

      And what happened? Seems prior to 150 years ago, a bunch of states decided they were functionally separate countries anyways. Hell, when they were told they weren't separate countries, they tried to secede!

      Then even after that, they kept enacting laws that went against the constitution. And kept trying to tell the federal government, which was enforcing the national laws, to sod off.

      It's no coincidence that the Tea Party happens to be at its strongest in the segregationist southeast...

    93. Re:You can't eliminate them by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      2 quarters is more convenient than 4 dimes. Or 1 dime, 1 quarter and one nickel. Or 8 nickles. Or 2 dimes and 4 nickles. You get the idea.

      The main issue is that quarters are the only coin we have of any real value. Everything else is tossed in a pile until the pile gets big enough to run it through the counting machine at the bank. I keep quarters in my dashboard tray (in fact the cars here come with quarter trays). They are handy for toll booths and especially parking meters. Every once in a while, I need to get a roll of quarters from the bank to replenish the tray.

      So yeah, if I came across a 40-cent toll, I'd be slightly put-out. I may or may not dig through my pockets to save 10 cents. Probably not.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    94. Re:You can't eliminate them by noh8rz2 · · Score: 1

      Did anybody else read the headline as "Obama orders cheaper pennis? Sounds like a viagra spam mi got yesterday.

    95. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FDR set the price of gold to its then-current market price. The reason for doing so was to fund the bank bailouts of the time. Look up FDIC. Gold price held steady until Nixon.
      Every government in history has ended up decreasing the value of its money, some faster than others.
      The dollar was originally based on the Spanish 8 Reales coin, about 24g of silver The Real (royal) was worth 34 maravedis at the time. Maravedi was a copper coin by then - it started out as a gold coin with 4g of gold.
      Who benefits from inflation? Everyone that owes money.
      Who loses from inflation? Everyone that someone owes money to.

    96. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop de-valueing the currancy problem solved. Quantitative easing is the problem which the Fed created themselves. There is no discussion required stop this dubious practice and the issue is gone.

    97. Re:You can't eliminate them by Chang · · Score: 4, Informative

      While this sounds nice and neat, this isn't actually constitutional. The document permits the national government to provide incentives for states to implement federal policy but it can't compel them to give up their power to implement sales taxes where permitted by state constitutions.

    98. Re:You can't eliminate them by Brobock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In other countries this is solved by laws demanding that all prices advertised to individuals (as opposed to companies) or where the target customer is clearly an individual include sales tax. So prices including the sales tax are conveniently set to nice round numbers.

      Sweden just had an issue where including the tax in the price caused recently reduced taxes to not get passed to the customer.

      Restaurants had a tax reduction from 25% to 12.5%. Since the tax was already included in the price, none of the restaurants reduced the prices and just pocketed the profit. If the price shown was pre-tax and the tax added in tally, the customer would have received the tax break.

      The only ones that actually reduced their prices was the large food chains. Most likely because watch dog groups were making sure of this.

    99. Re:You can't eliminate them by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's odd - like a 27 mph speed limit. New Jersey had 35-cent tolls (or a discount token) for the longest time, and it was pretty annoying. They should have charged 50 cents and sold the tokens at a discount. Less time spent waiting for occasional users of the road to dig for change.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    100. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just spelt it wrong. We Brits use forty same as you. But we don't use cents...

    101. Re:You can't eliminate them by Brobock · · Score: 2

      The country I am in now (Sweden) does not round the prices. They still use the obsolete öre (in physical form) in the prices. What they do is round it to the nearest krone. Some times you benefit if less than 50 öre and they round down, otherwise they round up.

    102. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Damn I wish I hadn't already commented, you'd definitely get a mod-up.

    103. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      foty nigra, you and yo colerful venacular!

    104. Re:You can't eliminate them by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see this doing anything but increasing prices. Ignoring that I'm already under a lower local sales tax, take that $9.99 item. Add your sales tax, you get $10.69. Retailers will round up to $10.99. Congratulations, you've just created a 10% sales tax.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    105. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why Govt. can't pring plastic money, at least in this scenario.

      and use some encryption too.

      should be recyclable.

    106. Re:You can't eliminate them by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      The locals who are prepared have a roll of dimes to pay the exact fare. The out of towners likely don't have exact change and just pay an extra 10 cents. It's an effective tax against out of towners.

    107. Re:You can't eliminate them by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      drop the last decimal place. get rid of pennies, nickels and quarters. Go to just dimes and 50c pieces and dollar coins. Make the 50c pieces smaller and cheaper to make. Problems solved.

    108. Re:You can't eliminate them by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      There is no reason you can't do this. Just pick the nice round number and divide by 1 plus the tax rate as a decimal (5.5% here, so .055).

      There is no law saying you have to label things "+ Tax" instead of "Including Tax".

      Internet sales are another matter(in the US) as tax is only applied if the purchase is shipped to the same state you sell from(unless you count pointless regulation from places like New York where they try and try to tax interstate sales with little to no success).

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    109. Re:You can't eliminate them by Dhalka226 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't disagree with you, but companies pitch a fit over it.

      There's actually a very comparable situation going on right now. Recently an FCC rule took effect that required airlines to include taxes and fees in the airfare they list. Now Spirit Airlines runs a huge banner at the top of their pages that says: "WARNING: New government regulations require us to HIDE taxes in your fares." And believe me, Slashdot does not permit enough HTML to make it as obnoxious as they do!

      In some ways they have a point. At least when you order a $1 item and end up paying $1.08 you know to be mad at the government about that 8 cents. In other ways you have a point. I want to know how much something actually costs, not how much it should cost in some mythical tax-free situation. That's especially true of something like airfare, where that extra amount could easily be over $100. Spirit is a low-cost carrier, but for example last time I visited friends in Australia (3 years ago I believe) the airfare was around $2200 -- the taxes and fees brought it up something over $2400 if I remember right. That's a significant difference and certainly something that needs to be budgeted for. Knowing that in advance is helpful since it's not like I can opt not to pay those taxes and fees.

      Of course the simple compromise is to show the actual costs including taxes and fees and then require that it be broken down somewhere else: On your receipt, confirmation email, before you type in your payment information -- whatever suits the particular situation. But compromise is a dirty word in American culture these days, so it will all depend on which faction can steamroll the other into doing it their way.

    110. Re:You can't eliminate them by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      $0.95 is even cheaper than $0.99...just saying. If you want to discuss the psychological aspects, let's talk about dropping the big shiny silver coin, instead of the tiny worthless brownish-gold coin.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    111. Re:You can't eliminate them by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Most stores in the Netherlands have gotten rid of them. But we never had 1 or 2 cent coins pre-euro. So it came natural.

    112. Re:You can't eliminate them by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      You're one of those dastardly METRIC system people, aren't you? Get out! Go on, take your logic and simple order and shove it.

      We work based on 1/8ths, 12s and 5280s. That is the scale we know and love, and I'll be damned if you'll take it from us!

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    113. Re:You can't eliminate them by slew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you get rid of the nickel, you essentially need to get rid of the quarter. You need to have all larger denomination coins divisible by at least one of the smaller denomination coins. Unless, of course, you are a sadist. Getting rid of the nickel seems like a non-starter. However, dumping the dime w/o getting rid of the nickel would probably work.

    114. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, 100 pennies for a dollar and 25 for a quarter? I'm pretty sure those exchange rates are standard. Unless you're talking about trying to use a random stranger on the street to cash in your pennies for dollars and/or quarters, in which case you will have to pay an additional convenience fee due to the "Hey buddy, I'm not a freakin' bank" clause. Your best bet would be throwing them at the "I'm out of gas and my wallet is in the backpack that I left [at work / in the garage / at the gym] and I really need to [pick up my kid for my once-per-month visitation / attend my mother's funeral / be at my parents' 60th anniversary party]" guy in the nearest parking lot for entertainment.

    115. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where the GP is from but he or she describes Finland pretty well.

    116. Re:You can't eliminate them by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      We already have that "problem": 5% sales tax in Va on a $9.99 item.... pretty sure we round the $0.1995 up to $0.20.

    117. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put the cash registers in the county portion. All the "sales" occur there.

    118. Re:You can't eliminate them by Entropius · · Score: 2

      If I were the seller I'd make a huge deal out of the fact that, by playing these games, you can get me to round the price down.

      Hell, I'll round down to the nearest *quarter* if you'll pay cash -- it's still cheaper than the 47 cent debit card fee.

    119. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess! The cash registers were on the side outside of the city limits.

    120. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be young. We did have 1 cent coins pre-euro, but just like with the euro 1 and 2 cents the production costs were higher than the value and that was why we stopped using them. We even had 1/2 cents long ago, my grandmother once gave me one.

    121. Re:You can't eliminate them by Pokermike · · Score: 1

      I don't have 9/10 of a penny either, but that hasn't stopped any gas stations from using prices like "$3.49 9/10" and then charging me the rounded amount.

    122. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many stores and people in The Netherlands, for one.

      Just like before the introduction of the euro, the Dutch 1-cent coins were officially phased out in 1980. Everything for rounded up or down to the nearest nickle. Then the guilder was replaced by the euro, and many/most people felt that the new 1-cent euro coins were pointless especially since they were already used to the rounding at that point.

    123. Re:You can't eliminate them by citab · · Score: 1

      agreed ... get rid of both the Penny & the Nickel ...

    124. Re:You can't eliminate them by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The restaurant stupidity seems to have been a matter of our current government succumbing to blind ideological impulses combined with lobbyism from the restaurant owners of this great country. The moment I heard of the suggestion to lower taxes on restaurant meals my first thought was "lobbyists, and they'll go along with it without a second thought because it matches their ideology"...

      Yeah, I'm a bit of a cynic when it comes to "the alliance" randomly making changes without much thought, at least when the left (S+V+MP) do it there is public outrage, the alliance just get away with it.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    125. Re:You can't eliminate them by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Chicago my friend! Where you are charged Chicago sales tax, Cook County sales tax, and Illinois sales tax. And god help you if you want to buy something like a soda, where you pay an extra fat tax of 3%. I guess that's easier to account for than half your store being in different places, but only barely.

      I believe the effective rate ends up just under 10% for normal items. If you get hit with any of the extra hits (3% soda, 1% prepared foods, probably others) it will be over 10% every time. It's pretty ridiculous.

    126. Re:You can't eliminate them by SMoynihan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly!

      "One, two, three, for..."

    127. Re:You can't eliminate them by bennomatic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently, at least some of you Brits make up for your extraneous U's with a profound lack of humour.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    128. Re:You can't eliminate them by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Of course the simple compromise is to show the actual costs including taxes and fees and then require that it be broken down somewhere else: On your receipt, confirmation email, before you type in your payment information -- whatever suits the particular situation. But compromise is a dirty word in American culture these days, so it will all depend on which faction can steamroll the other into doing it their way.

      And that's how it's done here in Sweden. Your receipt shows just how much of what you are paying is taxes but the advertised price has to be including taxes (so as not to mislead customers).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    129. Re:You can't eliminate them by koxkoxkox · · Score: 1

      The same thing happens in India. I sometimes get a little caramel to replace a rupee (2 cents at the current exchange rate).

    130. Re:You can't eliminate them by Calydor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I see on the shelf is exactly what I pay.

      That is kind of the point of a nationwide identical tax on things, allowing stores to write out price stickers showing exactly what you're paying without having to calculate which part is tax etc.

      Hence the comment further up about stores being forced to write out what you have to pay, not what the base price is, when targeting 'civilian' customers.

      This whole thing America has with having to manually add taxes and tips at restaurants is a real head-shaker for many Europeans. We only give a tip if we've been treated above and beyond the ordinary, since the serving staff at a given restaurant actually collects a paycheck. You should try that system sometime. :-)

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    131. Re:You can't eliminate them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      we have computers now, so I can't imagine why it would be hard to round to what ever the store wants.
      As far as advertising outside of the store, don't make adding the tax mandatory.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    132. Re:You can't eliminate them by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      My mother has an ongoing argument with the electricity company, who, when the bill doesn't come to an even 5c round it to the nearest 5, despite the fact that no-one pays their electricity bill with cash. This is in Australia where we've been rounding for quite some time, now.

    133. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who gets hit by tolls that are three fricking dollars, I am interested in this area and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      I'll take the 40 cent inconvenience over the thorough raping of getting hit with 3 dollar fees, then a buck fifty, etc every time I leave Chicago.

    134. Re:You can't eliminate them by box4831 · · Score: 1

      1/8ths

      eighthths?

      --
      Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
    135. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, get rid of the dime and make the penny smaller. So that size increases with value. Penny to Nickel to Quarter to mythical Dollar coin. It would also be useful for the blind.

      Step onto soapbox, begin rant.

      While we are at it, why not get rid of the $10 bill as well. ATMs only spit out $20 and we would only need to increase the $5 production somewhat. We would then have $1, $5, $20 mostly and this would make room for $50 in the cash drawer. We could even loose the $50 and jump right to the $100.

      $1 x 5 = $5 x 4 = $20 x 5 = $100 Am I the only one who see the logic in this.

      Likewise

      $0.01 x 5 = $0.05 x 5 = $0.25 x 4 = $1.00

      end rant, step down from soapbox.

    136. Re:You can't eliminate them by Calydor · · Score: 1

      And why not make it mandatory?

      That's meant as a serious question; as a European I obviously don't know anything about what advantages there may be to seeing the price before the tax you'll end up paying at the register anyway; isn't it more reasonable for a given customer to be able to see at a quick glance how much money will be leaving his or her wallet in a moment?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    137. Re:You can't eliminate them by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      That's just dirty marketing. When you're paying a set percentage on everything it's fine not to include it in the final price because we all know what the percentage is and we expect to pay it. The problem with airline tickets was there are other taxes and fees that are hidden until you went to pay so they can advertise a $500.00 flight and charge you $1200.00 when you went to pay. People demanded clear pricing and the government provided it.

    138. Re:You can't eliminate them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      SO you want to as a federakl tax? ok, there is a valid discussion there.

      You want to remove the states write to have , or not have, there own state tax? that's a non starter.

      The posters proposal would mean a serious economic tax inequity.

      Write now, it's pretty trivial to get the tax for any specific area. IT's all published in nice easy to read layouts. This 'IT's to hard' lie coming from companies who exists because of computers is laughable. Seriously, when amazon said that we all should have pointed and laughed at them.

      ", they'll figure out a way to reduce the cost of their product "
      Raise, not reduce. Margin are already pretty thin, so they would round up to the next 99.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    139. Re:You can't eliminate them by randomencounter · · Score: 2

      Of course it's reasonable, which is why it will never happen here in the US.

      There is a business advantage to be had in being unreasonable.

      --
      Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
    140. Re:You can't eliminate them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no. You have not created a 10% sales tax. You have created a larger profit margin for the shop.

      This is an important distinction, in that it means they can be more competitive with wages, or other value add items.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    141. Re:You can't eliminate them by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Even before the Euro, Finland used to round to the nearest 5 of whatever the subunit of the markka was

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    142. Re:You can't eliminate them by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the majority of the US now pays a lot more than 7%. I believe, for example, that New York City has something like 10.5% sales tax. Chicago is 8.5% in the city, at least. Heck, Chandler, AZ which isn't exactly a huge metropolis has 8.5% sales tax.

      I suspect there are a few hamlets out there with a 5% tax rate, but it is probably a secret. They would be overwhelmed with people if it was generally known how cheap it was there.

    143. Re:You can't eliminate them by elvis15 · · Score: 1

      It's more like you Americans and your crazy dropping of the 'u' - Any number of the commonwealth countries follow the proper English spelling. Most countries have changed over to metric as well...

    144. Re:You can't eliminate them by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      That's not the worst of it! 76 percent of responders would pick up a penny on the ground if they saw it! That won't even cover 0.1% of your co-pay when you break your back or get an infection from a dirty penny.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    145. Re:You can't eliminate them by biquet · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that "the" is syntactically singular? The other speakers of English will be quite surprised to hear this. In any case, while there has indeed been a shift from plural "United States" to singular, it was certainly not a rapid change caused by the Civil War: http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1798

    146. Re:You can't eliminate them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You should note that Spirit airline added a charge of $2 per ticket — dubbed the Department of Transportation unintended consequences fee.

      Ben Is a douche bag who will do what ever it takes to hide information from consumers.

      Funny, that go on about 'hiding' the tax, and take effort to add a fee and put obnoxious scrolling lies, but then claim that can't break out the fee if the consumer clicks on a 'price break out' link.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    147. Re:You can't eliminate them by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Many other countries are smaller then individual states.

    148. Re:You can't eliminate them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. For nation wide adds, say a price and then 'plus local taxes' When you are in a situation or place where you can actually make the purchase, all prices there must include local taxes. IN fact, you can say the actually price has to be twice as big as the pre tax price.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    149. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, when I was living in Chicagoland, there were lots of 40 cent tolls.

      My coworkers would get mad, because 'I have to keep three kinds of coins - quarters, dimes, and nickels!'

      I'd look at them like they were stupid, and say 'I only need ONE kind of coin to pay that toll.' And they'd say 'Well, you can use two quarters, but that wastes ten cents!'

      And I'd say 'No, dumbass. I use four dimes.' And they thought I was some sort of god-level intelligence for thinking of it.

      And it wasn't an isolated occurrence. This happened almost every time the tollway came up in conversation.

      Really? Is 'OVER TWENTY-FIVE CENTS! MUST USE QUARTER' drummed into people violently somewhere?

    150. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same in France, never heard of getting rid of them. Prices are not rounded in any way.

    151. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Brazil, the taxes are included in the price, but stores will set a price that leaves 1 to 3 cents of change to the customer because most customers don't ask for the change. And if they do, the store clerk makes them feel ashamed for being "cheap". Even worse, if you ask for your change they will ask if they can give a piece of candy instead.

    152. Re:You can't eliminate them by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      You somehow misunderstand that this is a state-level issue. It isn't.

      Counties, townships and municipalities are all independent taxing bodies in some states. Ohio, for example, has a taxing arrangement like this and I believe a lot of Eastern states do as well. Arizona is just by city. Illinois is by county, not city.

      What this means for Ohio is there are over 1,000 different tax rates for the state depending on the mix of county, township and city. Illinois has 102 counties and I suspect there are cities with their own taxes on top of the county standard - so likely there are nearly 1,000 different tax rates there as well. Oh, and it doesn't just depend on where the store is located. In many places it depends on the home address of the customer, not the store. Which means they have to ask where their customer is located so they can figure out the correct tax.

      Any business which is multi-state and has to pay sales taxes in multiple locations subscribes to a tax service which handles all of this for them. The point-of-sale system has to be updated on at least a monthly basis because failure to keep up with the tax rate changes results in penalties and fines.

      You wonder why Amazon is fighting so hard to keep from paying taxes everywhere? Well, this is the reason. It doesn't just mean collecting the taxes from each sale and paying them - it means paying for expensive services to supply you with the proper tax rate based upon an address or zip code. It also means submitting taxes to thousands of different taxing bodies each with their own forms and own rules. So nobody does this - they pay a service to compute it and file it for them.

    153. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh no we can't have 9.99$

      Yes, we can... The gas station I passed this morning displayed the price 346.9 cents for a gallon. I've never seen a tenth-penny coin and I remember when the cents symbol used to be on the typewriter. It's been gone so long, /. won't display the symbol.

    154. Re:You can't eliminate them by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      That has been my idea for the last decade at least. We have had way more than 10X inflation since pennies were created as the smallest coin, so time to give them the chuck. Its not like we don't round already. My locality uses a 8.25% sales tax, so .99 is 1.071675 and no one gets their panties in a bunch over the .001675 error.

    155. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. For nation wide adds, say a price and then 'plus local taxes'

      Fastest way to receive cease & desist letters over here. That's exactly NOT "advertising the end price"

      --
      bickerdyke
    156. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is...I'm in tears

      such a beautiful idea.

    157. Re:You can't eliminate them by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Also, you could round up or down to 5 cents at the cashier. So that would be $0.02 extra in your grocery bill. It's not like the shown prices (in many places) in the States include the taxes anyway.

      --
      It is what it is.
    158. Re:You can't eliminate them by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Well in Chicago, it's currently 9.75%, unless you are at a restaurant that prepares your food, then it's 10.75%. Or you are buying groceries, then it's 12.00%, unless those groceries are a soft drink, then it's 12.75%. I'm not exactly sure what it is if you are at a restaurant that serves you a soft drink, it's either the 9.75% + 1% (prepared food/drink) + 3% (soft drink), or perhaps they don't consider soft drinks prepared.

      It's so much simpler in the suburbs.

    159. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      under these circumstances, regulations about end-price advertising wouldn't be possible. That was my first point to begin with.

      Or rather that the situation here can't be compared to Europe where the borders of different sales tax regulations are the same as the borders of ad channels. (1 country, same tax, nationwide papers/tv --> regulation works)

      --
      bickerdyke
    160. Re:You can't eliminate them by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      yes, but the nationwide advertising channels are proportionally smaller too.

      --
      bickerdyke
    161. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One, two, three, for ...

      Ha, this is kind of fun.

      Wun, too, three, fawr ... :)

    162. Re:You can't eliminate them by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      No, I think most of the "ads must show final price" argument isn't about sales taxes based on a percentage of the selling price. Most of the argument is focused on hidden fees and riders added to the final price to compensate for other company expenses, including other (non-sales) taxes.

      For example, suppose a company is selling their product for $9.99. I should be able to buy it knowing my city/county/state sales tax of 8.25% will be added to the final price, no problem. But when I get to the register, the actual price is $13.99 plus tax, because the company is charging me:
      $1.00 for "Safety regulation tax recovery charge"
      $1.00 for "Fuel surcharge"
      $1.00 for "Property tax recovery charge"
      $1.00 for "We needed to buy a new truck this month recovery charge"

      See the difference? When an airline or cell phone carrier (which is where many of these "hidden fee" problems occur) attempts to add fees and charges to the advertised price, they might claim that they are to recover government-imposed fees. But really, they are just selling their product at a higher than advertised price. Doing so to pay for a new "tax recovery" is no different than doing so to pay for a "fuel surcharge" or a "I want a new boat" surcharge. Any business can try to sell their product at a high enough price to cover the cost of their new boat - that's what capitalism is about - but they can't advertise a lower price to trick customers then pull a bait-and-switch at the register.

      Now would I, personally, mind if all prices including sales tax are added to printed prices? No, I wouldn't mind. But a lot of people think this hides the sales tax and makes the public complacent to taxation. Whatever. As has been pointed out in other posts, the price of everything already has taxation built into it, to cover the income tax of the workers, the property tax paid for the factory, and the gas tax used to drive it to the store. It's impossible to separate all of those out and it shouldn't be legal to advertise a price then add riders and surcharges at the register to increase that price so as to generate more revenue.

      Fortunately companies aren't humans and their commercial speech can and should be highly regulated under anti-fraud laws. (Just like commercial speech of sole proprietorships can be regulated, too.) And anyone who says otherwise is flat-out wrong, even if they wear black robes to work, and will be shown wrong over time one way or another.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    163. Re:You can't eliminate them by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I hope they were able to put the registers in the county area. That's where the actual sale takes place, right? The store itself is more like a warehouse and show room. The registers are where the transactions take place.

      They probably just needed a good lawyer.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    164. Re:You can't eliminate them by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      Why is it misleading when the price does not include sales tax? Isn't it MORE misleading to include sales tax into final price, as it hides how much the government is taxing us? Then again, I'm in favor of abolishing mandatory income tax withholding too. Make people write a check every month to the IRS, instead of tricking people with a rebate for overpayment every year.

    165. Re:You can't eliminate them by KingMotley · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sure it's simple, so please enlighten me. If I order powdered vitamin water packets, and I have them delivered to my work address in Chicago, but I'm ordering from my house in Oakbrook, DuPage county, please tell me the tax that should get applied since it's simple.

      Please remember:
      Illinois base Sales Tax is 6.25%.
      Dupage County Sales Tax is 1%.
      Oakbrook Sales tax is .5%
      Cook County Sales tax is 2%.
      The Chicago Municipal Tax is 1.5%.
      The use tax in Chicago is 1% for anything bought from a retailer.
      There is a 2.25% tax applied to drugs and groceries in Chicago.
      There is an additional 3% tax on soft drinks.
      There is a 1% tax on prepared foods and beverages.

      Is Amazon a retailer? Do they need to apply the 1% use tax?
      Is powdered vitamin water considered a prepared beverage? Or is it a soft drink? Does the grocery tax apply? Or all of the above?
      Does the sales tax get applied to my shipping address, my residence address, or my ordering address? What if I have the package is rerouted, or if I pick the package up at the local UPS depot which is in a different city or a different county? Does UPS then charge me the difference in sales tax?

      And sadly, this is a simplified example. I didn't even get into whether I shipped it to a specific district in the city of Chicago which can/often does have different sales taxes, and I haven't tried to outline all the Oakbrook specific exceptions.

    166. Re:You can't eliminate them by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      There's also a very good reason why the President and Vice President are elected by the Electoral College rather than popular vote (maybe you should read up on it some time)

      No there isn't. The original intent (distrust of the electorate) no longer applies because all states electors are required to go with the result of their states popular vote anyway. So while the electoral system used to have some (debatable) value, in its current form it is nothing more then a broken popular vote which counts some voters more then others.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    167. Re:You can't eliminate them by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Alaska doesn't have a state sales tax at all, and any attempt to impose one would likely result in riots. Shit's already ridiculously inflated price-wise up there, and there are already lots of people living well below the poverty line (simply having indoor plumbing up there is considered a premium in a lot of places and jacks rents up), so a Federal sales tax would severely hurt them.

    168. Re:You can't eliminate them by Chang · · Score: 1

      Using the Coinstar experience, the answer to this question is something under 90.2 cents but the data is clouded by nickels, dimes, and quarters...

    169. Re:You can't eliminate them by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Some countries have already eliminated their 1/100 currency (New Zealand, IIRC). It is no big deal. However, this could bring some more business to us programmers. I had to develop a method for rounding up or down to the nearest 5/100th (I don't say "nickel" because it was not US currency), and it is not trivial--throw in the fact that it only applies to cash transactions. A lot of software would have to be updated. Yay! I say bring it on...get rid of the penny. If it sounds simple give it a whirl in your favorite lang.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    170. Re:You can't eliminate them by Lazarian · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you be bothered to throw that offensive penny into a jar for the sake of giving it to an animal shelter or something? A handful of pennies might be totally insignificant to you, but to others it would make a significant difference.

    171. Re:You can't eliminate them by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      While this sounds nice and neat, this isn't actually constitutional. The document permits the national government to provide incentives for states to implement federal policy but it can't compel them to give up their power to implement sales taxes where permitted by state constitutions.

      I propose an Amendment to end the farce of incentive vs. compulsory central policy making. All the Feds have to do to make a policy effectively compulsory is withhold all federal funding from a State for non-compliance, and since the Federalis tax so heavily and spend so heavily in all states, they could turn New York into the economic equivalent of Mississippi in about 3 years if they chose to.

      Witness: the Federally imposed legal drinking age of 21 - tied to highway funding.

    172. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Portugal we also use them.

    173. Re:You can't eliminate them by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      You're talking about Jerry Jones, aren't you?

    174. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A business pays all sorts of taxes. Why should I care. I just want to know what something costs. If you tell me it's $1, don't ask me to pay $1.10 at the register, that's unethical and stupid. I don't care what city you're in or what laws you have to follow. I don't even vote in your city! If you pay taxes, that's your problem. Just give me a real price and no more bullshit.

    175. Re:You can't eliminate them by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Redesigning the penny and nickel to be cheaper to produce seems like a complicated solution to a simple problem.

      The solution is very simple - just outsource the production to China like everything else...

    176. Re:You can't eliminate them by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Right, but what are the chances that the money ends up in the "New Ferrari" jar for the owner?

    177. Re:You can't eliminate them by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      They actually wanted to do $13,999.99999999999~, but someone told them it was equal to $14k, so they could no longer claim it was less than. Their heads exploded.

      This seems like a workable solution to the problem of used car salesmen. You should patent it and charge royalties.

    178. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be trivial....

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. HA HA HA HA HA!. HEE HEE HEE. HA hee hee ha ha ha. HO HO Hee ha ha hee hee ho ho ha! HA!

      In theory it would be trivial. In reality it would take four decades, seventeen scandals, and trillions and trillions of dollars for this to happen. There's a reason we have a saying that a difficult thing will 'take an act of Congress' to happen. Means: 'When Hell freezes over' to you, bub.

    179. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume that works on people who set their clocks 20 minute ahead so they're on time); rounding would ruin that.

      It also works on your subconscious. We all like to think we're enlightened and above such subtle manipulation because we're consciously aware of it, but you really can't avoid a non-zero bias introduced by these psychological tricks. It might not be enormous, because you consciously translate "$299" into "$300", but the truth is your brain saw a smaller leading number first, and that shaped your first impression.

    180. Re:You can't eliminate them by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      (FWIW I live in the UK where consumer-oriented prices *are* usually quoted with VAT (i.e. sales tax) included and prefer it that way- but that's because we have uniform VAT across the country. I understand why the US doesn't include it.)

      IMHO, the U.S. doesn't include it because of an in your face "Don't blame me for these prices it's the damn tax man that's making me charge this," attitude.

      Personally, I find a store that charges me $2 (net, inclusive of tax) for an item that's labeled as $2 on the shelf far more attractive than one that has a shelf tag that reads $1.83 and charges $1.96 at the register, or $2.01 at the branch downtown because of the special taxing district. In the U.S. these stores are very rare.

    181. Re:You can't eliminate them by scuzzlebutt · · Score: 0

      We also have half dollar coins, but they rarely circulate outside of casinos.

      --
      In C++, your friends can see your privates.
    182. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Jerry Jones.

      The assholes who pulled this shit in Wisconsin (yes, Republican corruption in WI does predate Scott Walker, he's just the most obvious to date).
      The owners of several soccer teams in the SW USA lately... according to news, the Houston Dynamo most recently extorted money from Harris County for theirs.

      How about this?

    183. Re:You can't eliminate them by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. For nation wide adds, say a price and then 'plus local taxes' When you are in a situation or place where you can actually make the purchase, all prices there must include local taxes.

      In the US, the taxes (and therefore the total price) can change just depending on which side of the street your business is on. Even local radio or TV advertising is almost guaranteed to spread over multiple tax rate areas.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    184. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A better solution - stop debasing the currency.

    185. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he lost the argument 150 years ago, when the Civil War was fought.

      Without commenting on the merits of any of the other preceding comments wrt federalism, I think it's worth pointing out that winning a fight is not the same thing as winning an argument.

    186. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the number of coins involved. You cannot possibly pay exact change without having at minimum three coins. A 50 cent toll would only take two.

    187. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert, having vacationed in Italy twice, and France once, but I encountered only 1 each of 1 and 2 cent coins, and I saved both of them.

      Italy used to have some nice-looking coins made from stainless steel. Hefty, shiny, probably cheaper than Cu/Zn.

    188. Re:You can't eliminate them by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      This will break down into an argument over the "weighted formula that takes into account population, economic activity, or both."

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    189. Re:You can't eliminate them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      In some states it is illegal to post the price including the sales tax. So, there are many stores that would like to do so, but they are not allowed to by state law.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    190. Re:You can't eliminate them by isj · · Score: 1

      That is not entirely true.
      The train station ticket machines gives them back in change, and merchants happily accept them. But it is true that you normally won't get them in change from merchants.

    191. Re:You can't eliminate them by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure at first. The description seemed too charitable.

    192. Re:You can't eliminate them by operagost · · Score: 1

      It has the one big, fat disadvantage of being unconstitutional and taking rights away from the states to give it to the federal government. It's another system to abuse-- states that go along with the administration get more money, those who oppose it get less.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    193. Re:You can't eliminate them by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      The way things are going it seems like it might come to a point where a state, say Texas, tells the Federal government what it can do with itself and decides to forgo the money.

      The problem with that is that I see no consequence that does not involve a massive retaliatory action from from Federal government, especially with the current administration.

      I think it's going to continue until a state gets pissed off enough to try seceding, and then all bets are off. I don't see the U.S. surviving this century in its current form, and I would not put it past the Federal government (again, especially under the current Administration) to send in troops.

      It's not that I want to see a Second American Revolution. That would be horrible. It's that I think that's what it's going to take to restore this country, or at least part of it, to something resembling what it was meant to be, what should be, and what will actually work.

      Oh, and they should have abolished pennies a long time ago like Sweden, Australia and New Zealand. There's no legitimate reason to keep them.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    194. Re:You can't eliminate them by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Thing is that in some isolated cases, sellers have to give the price including all taxes here in the US too. Gasoline is one such case.

      What they don't have are laws requiring it across the board, which is why hamburger chains can have totally misleading ads like "but I only have a dollar! No problem, you can get a double cheeseburger from the dollar menu". Except that in most states, you would be without that burger if you only had a dollar, cause you wouldn't have enough for the sales tax.

      And while the argument that interstate commerce would be affected is real, it was also solved in Europe a long time ago, where people do shop across the borders, perhaps more so than stateside: Ads and price tags can have both prices, with and without sales tax, as long as it's clear which one is which, and the most prominent one is the price the target audience will have to pay.
      There really is no confusion caused by letting customers know the real price. And when everybody has to do it, nobody loses the marketing advantage of the lower price.

    195. Re:You can't eliminate them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      And where is the money to administer this system going to come from? Why should Delaware residents (which currently has no sales tax) be forced to pay sales tax? They have chosen to finance their state government without a sales tax, now you want to impose one on them from the federal government for some rather minimal advantages for other states.
      And it won't save the consumer money, it will cost the consumer money. At the $0.99 price point adding 7 cents to the cost will take over the point at which keeping the price at $0.99 was worth enough in sales to offset the lower profit margin. That means I may as well raise the price to $1.25 or $1.50 (depending on how price sensitive the item in question is). I worked at a convenience store and we did that. We squeezed our margins as far as we could to keep the price at $0.99, but once we crossed the line to $1.00 the price always jumped to $1.25 if not $1.50 (and when we made that jump other items that we might have kept at $0.99 usually went along).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    196. Re:You can't eliminate them by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

      The smallest coin in Sweden is a krona, which is about 15 cents. That works just fine. We actually only have 3 types of coins: 1, 5 and 10. Very nice. You can actually pay with coins without really looking at them, even if you have no training for it.

    197. Re:You can't eliminate them by operagost · · Score: 1

      And that's pretty much why we don't want a VAT in the USA.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    198. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 1

      ...they could turn New York into the economic equivalent of Mississippi in about 3 hours if they chose to.

      FTFY.

    199. Re:You can't eliminate them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      It's not that the staff in the store couldn't put the price inclusive of tax up; it's only advertising to people in that particular store and it's just a blackboard that they rewrite every day or two anyway.

      You are correct, but in more than one state it would be illegal.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    200. Re:You can't eliminate them by operagost · · Score: 1

      100 cents = 1 dollar.
      100 centimeters = 1 meter.
      Am I missing something?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    201. Re:You can't eliminate them by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      This whole thing America has with having to manually add taxes and tips at restaurants is a real head-shaker for many Europeans.

      I have a feeling it started out this way in America but when the employers realized that if you're getting all those tips then I don't have to pay you minimum wage. My son works as a server at a nice restaurant and makes $2.32 an hour plus tips. He even has to 'tip out' (giving 10% of his tips to the hostess).

      What started out as a tip for good service is now part of their wages.

    202. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Cell phone companies are often caught doing this - and the worse part is they've been caught LYING and claiming the fees are federally mandated when in many cases, the fees are pure bullshit and connected to no tax or regulation whatsoever!

    203. Re:You can't eliminate them by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I don't see this doing anything but increasing prices. Ignoring that I'm already under a lower local sales tax, take that $9.99 item. Add your sales tax, you get $10.69. Retailers will round up to $10.99. Congratulations, you've just created a 10% sales tax.

      That's the stupidest argument I've heard so far.
      Just as likely, they'll drop their prices so the item WITH sales tax is still $9.99.

    204. Re:You can't eliminate them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons that companies pitch a fit over the government hiding taxes in the price of goods can be seen with gasoline. It is not as big a deal now as it was (although still significant). Back in the 90s there was a big deal of anger at the oil companies and gasoline retailers when gas prices went to around $1.20 from under $1.00. At the time, gasoline taxes were around $0.18 per gallon federal and around $0.30 per gallon state tax. Gas retailers were making less than $0.10 per gallon before expenses (my recollection is that it was less than $0.05, but I am not positive of that). There were a bunch of politicians who made a big deal about the "greedy oil companies", yet the biggest single share of the cost of a gallon of gas was the taxes.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    205. Re:You can't eliminate them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Actually most states actually have tax tables that define how much tax should be charged at various price points. These are not just conveniences for businesses, they define how the tax rate is rounded.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    206. Re:You can't eliminate them by pla · · Score: 1

      No standard or defined conditions of rounding will fix that.

      No legitimate program that deals with money should ever use floating point math for monetary calculations or storage. You either use fixed point dollars with four (as the standard) decimal places, or you track tenths of a mil as an integer. This not only avoids rounding errors, it precludes rounding entirely, by letting you treat percents (to a resolution of 0.01%) as the multiplication of two integers.

      As for what you actually choose to charge the customer for a $1.0427 item, that amounts to merely a matter of store policy. But FP precision has absolutely nothing to do with it.

    207. Re:You can't eliminate them by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      The way to do this in the U.S. would be as follows:

      • Impose a 7% national sales tax, payable to the federal government. At the same time, prohibit states and localities from collecting their own sales taxes. The result would be largely revenue-neutral, since the total of state and local sales taxes averages about 7% already.
      • Have the federal government distribute this money on a regular basis to states (6%) and localities (1%), based on some weighted formula that takes into account population, economic activity, or both.

      Wow, this is so anti-republic. I can just see it now:
      "I'm sorry state XX but you don't mandate the federal y policy so no tax dollars for you.

      Yeah, the federal government needs another goad to whip the states into conformance.

    208. Re:You can't eliminate them by chilvence · · Score: 1

      If you want to make fun of anybody's spelling, make fun of the french. Please. For their own sake.

    209. Re:You can't eliminate them by ultramk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course, there's a trade-off to not tipping, such as the astonishingly poor service that Europeans seem to take for granted at anything less than very high-end dining establishments. Now, it doesn't seem to bother you all so you might as keep it the way it is. Americans, on the other hand, seem to place a much higher value on careful and conscientious service, and that's why our pay structure for servers is the way it is--to promote that good service.

      The habit is so ingrained in us that it's very difficult to _not_ tip when traveling abroad. It just seems terribly rude. I wish however that Europeans were more willing to adopt to local norms when coming to the US. I have several friends and family members who either do now or or have worked as servers, and when a visiting European declines to conform to local custom and stiffs a server even when he or she received good service... well you've just done the equivalent of taking money out of that server's paycheck for the night.

      I realize how strange it is to visitors, but this is just the way our society is. It's a social contract, and it is taken very seriously. If one feels that strongly about it, you should either stick to fast food or buy food from the grocery and prepare it yourself, or better yet, stay home and don't travel to places where the customs bother you so much.

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    210. Re:You can't eliminate them by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      "Just as likely" that retailers will cut prices? You're kidding, right?

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    211. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, put all your checkout lines outside the city. I don't think there is a sales tax on storage space in St.Louis

    212. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [[Note that the Constitution creates a severely limited form of Federal government]]

      Yes, every day I read the news and am reminded of how severely limited the Federal government is (here in the USA).

    213. Re:You can't eliminate them by Moryath · · Score: 1

      In regards to the question of whether the states were allowed to create laws contradicting federal law, and allowed to secede when they didn't like federal decisions... actually I think losing that fight very much lost them the argument!

    214. Re:You can't eliminate them by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Interesting thing I found out recently when I sold some of my silver bullion to a coin dealer, it is now legal to melt down old US silver coins for the silver but yet you can't melt down the old 1982 and earlier pennies for the copper.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    215. Re:You can't eliminate them by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I loved that when I was in India for work except instead caramels it was a little bags of spicy salty snacks to make up the difference when purchasing some beers at the liquor store.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    216. Re:You can't eliminate them by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      I remember buying candies for a penny when I was a kid. When I take my kids to the candy store the smallest candies tend to be packages in ways where they cost about one dollar.

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    217. Re:You can't eliminate them by asylumx · · Score: 1

      the (nearly) all-powerful Federal government of today was never dreamed of by the Founders

      You can see into the founders' dreams? Did they have those crazy flying dreams that we all have today?

    218. Re:You can't eliminate them by 246o1 · · Score: 1

      "Just as likely" that retailers will cut prices? You're kidding, right?

      If shops could raise prices without any effect on sales, they would do that constantly. While I admire your cynicism, I despise your naivete.

      --
      Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    219. Re:You can't eliminate them by asylumx · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? "The United States" is no more singular than "The apples," as in "The apples are red." Are you saying that is not plural?

    220. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some states have sales tax, so that $9.95 becomes $10.74 (depending on the tax rate, of course).

      A percentage sales tax already brings the actual price to a fraction of a penny, in most cases, and we round that to the nearest penny just fine. Why not take it a step further and round to the nearest nickel?

      example: 8% sales tax on $9.99 brings the price to $10.7892, which we would round to $10.79 without hesitation. If we already do this, why not just take it a step further and round to $10.80?

    221. Re:You can't eliminate them by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 1

      This is also true in almost every movie theater I've attended in recent memory here in the US. All prices listed inside and out of the theater are tax inclusive. It's exceptionally convenient for me, since I can easily calculate in my head if I've got the spare change in my pocket to be able to get the larger size popcorn. It's the same thing with gasoline purchases. If I have a $20 in my pocket, I know that the most gas I can purchase is $20 worth. Given the current price of gasoline, however, good luck getting the dial to stop at exactly $20.

      --
      If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
    222. Re:You can't eliminate them by Solandri · · Score: 1

      It would be trivial, and WHOLLY within the power of the Congress, to pass a law requiring that advertisements show the TRUE price of an item with associated taxes rather than the misleading pre-tax value.

      As has been explained above, this would effectively make advertising prices illegal. A price (with taxes) you advertise in one tax jurisdiction would be illegally showing incorrect prices in a different tax jurisdiction. I live on the border between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles County. The sales tax in SBC is 7.75%. In LAC it's 8.25%. Stores would no longer be allowed to advertise prices on TV since if the price displayed on TV sets in SBC were correct, the price displayed on TV sets in LAC would be illegal (too low). Likewise if the prices in the ad were for LAC, they would be illegal on TV sets in SBC (false advertising).

      You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't allow every level of government to charge whatever taxes it feels like, while simultaneously requiring merchants to include said taxes in their advertised prices. If you want to force merchants to include taxes in their prices, you also have to force all levels of government to harmonize their sales taxes.

    223. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are leaving out that fact that the actual purpose of the tax reduction was not to save the consumers money, but to basically give more money to the restaurants, hoping they would hire more people. (Restaurants employ mostly young people and people which has less education, which is precisely the groups which has most difficulties finding jobs these days)

    224. Re:You can't eliminate them by Endo13 · · Score: 2

      By the time you have enough to make a significant difference for anyone, it's so many it's a pain in the ass to take anywhere. 1,000 pennies is only $10. Not worth my time. Other change adds up fast, but these days pennies are at best a terrible nuisance.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    225. Re:You can't eliminate them by Obfuscant · · Score: 0

      That is kind of the point of a nationwide identical tax on things, allowing stores to write out price stickers showing exactly what you're paying without having to calculate which part is tax etc.

      Thus hiding the amount of tax that a taxpayer is actually giving up to the government.

      You realize that the only thing that really keeps people from objecting to the high income tax rates is that the taxation takes place almost invisibly. I.e., you get a line item on your pay stub that you probably never look at. Then in April, you get free money from the government! (If you get a refund.)

      This whole thing America has with having to manually add taxes and tips at restaurants is a real head-shaker for many Europeans.

      The ready acceptance of higher and higher taxes at what many in America would consider confiscatory rates is a real head-shaker for many Americans. Once they realize that your VAT and many other taxes are hidden from you, it makes sense.

      We only give a tip if we've been treated above and beyond the ordinary, since the serving staff at a given restaurant actually collects a paycheck.

      This has nothing to do with taxes.

    226. Re:You can't eliminate them by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Well don't shop there if you feel it's too expensive! Shop at the guy with the lower prices; it's not that complicated!

    227. Re:You can't eliminate them by gewalker · · Score: 1

      0.1% - you are lucky, in Indianapolis it is 2.0% on restaurant purchases, I would trade with you in a heartbeat.

      BTW, In Indiana, it was bi-partisan corruption, mayor-D, statehouse (D/R) and governor-R. The mayor was perhaps the most guilty because he gave away just about everything in the early "negotiations"

    228. Re:You can't eliminate them by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Don't they have minimum wage laws in the States? Things are similar here in Canada but the server still has to be paid at least minimum wage along with basic benefits (which is often worked around by hiring part time workers) such as unemployment insurance (now called employment insurance) and Canada Pension Plan.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    229. Re:You can't eliminate them by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      But they wouldn't "constantly" have a scapegoat. Here they would - "the gubermint raised all of your prices".

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    230. Re:You can't eliminate them by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The Feds do legitimately have the right to regulate interstate travel. All they would have to do is make the requirement for any products that cross state lines. This would fit very clearly and legitimately within the Interstate Commerce clause. States and retailers could choose to label all interstate goods with tax included, and in state only products without sales tax. They could also add extra taxes on anything they produced wholly in state. I would guess that consumers and retailers would very quickly put a huge amount of pressure on their local representatives to stick to the Federal sales tax guidelines.

    231. Re:You can't eliminate them by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Impose a 7% national sales tax, payable to the federal government. At the same time, prohibit states and localities from collecting their own sales taxes. The result would be largely revenue-neutral, since the total of state and local sales taxes averages about 7% already.

      If only it were that simple. You have states like Oregon which have a high income tax but no sales tax. You have states like Washington with no income tax but high sales tax. So Oregon would complain that the new national sales tax is forcing them to completely rewrite their tax structure lest their residents revolt over paying high income tax and sales tax, while Washington is all smiles since they have to do practically nothing to comply. Meanwhile California is all upset that they're going to be getting reduced sales tax revenue (down from their >8%).

      So your simple proposal actually cascades into a major overhaul of most of the country's tax structure.

      Have the federal government distribute this money on a regular basis to states (6%) and localities (1%), based on some weighted formula that takes into account population, economic activity, or both.

      Sales tax, by definition, already has two locations where it's assigned. The location of the buyer and the location of the seller. No fancy formula needed, except for splitting between state / county / municipality.

      This would have several advantages. It would eliminate the current advantages that online stores have over brick-and-mortar retailers.

      Technically it's not an advantage that online stores enjoy. It's a disadvantage state and local governments willingly impose on their brick-and-mortar stores. It's completely in their power right now to level the playing field and reduce their sales tax to 0%, while increasing income and other taxes to compensate. No Federal action needed. I don't understand why it's primarily people on the left who oppose this idea, since the flat nature of sales tax makes it regressive in practice. All money people spend on purchases was income at some point, so whether you tax it as income or tax it as sales, it's the same thing. If sales taxes are creating too many headaches, just get rid of it and replace it with income and other taxes.

    232. Re:You can't eliminate them by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      The government needs to target the rental car industry. I was shocked at the low advertised prices of rentals when I was in the States, but even more shocked when I got to the hire place and the price more than quadruples with various fees. It's immoral and that should be illegal.

      Fortunately, I think Expedia includes these compulsory extras in its calculations.

    233. Re:You can't eliminate them by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Not entirely useless even today. Think of the Florida vote count debacle being national in scale.

    234. Re:You can't eliminate them by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we have a minimum wage. However, the server has to report enough tips to augment their $2.32 wage so that it meets the minimum wage. A classic perversion of what a tip is supposed to be. This shifts costs from the company to the customer with the worker getting screwed in the middle.

      Currently an good tip is 15-18% of the total bill. I've seen it rise over the years. And you can be sure that as the 'good percentage' goes up, the employee's hourly wage will be adjusted so that they make at or just over minimum wage.

    235. Re:You can't eliminate them by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Actually the answer is to drop the nickle at the same time, and change the $0.25 piece to a $0.10 piece. Not only would you solve the "Penny Problem", But you would also solve the "Nickle Problem". As an added bonus, we could count our money in tenths of a dollar instead of hundredths of a dollar. So instead of $123.20, you could reliably put in $123.2.

    236. Re:You can't eliminate them by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, our tipping system is actually kind of creepy and corrupt.

    237. Re:You can't eliminate them by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      So, in the long run, it is likely to save consumers money.

      What a ridiculous assumption.

      Your proposal falls so far outside the authority of the federal government under the Constitution that I imagine that Jefferson et.al. are spinning in their graves. The federal government simply does not have the authority to define for the states what their sales tax will be and parcel it out for them.

      There are no advantages to either the consumer or the businesses in your plan. The state of California, one of the most bankrupt states in the country, would lose a lot of money under this plan, and the ability to create a more stable revenue system. In most of the other states, consumers would see the cost of everything go up, because they pay less that 7% in sales tax. This is hardly a revenue-neutral system as you pretend.

      As for the advantages of mail-order over brick-and-mortar, well, two things. First, mail-order outfits don't use the local services as heavily as the brick and mortars (how many firemen in Tennessee report to a fire at the Amazon.com Washington facility when there is a fire?). Second, the brick-and-mortars have chosen their playground knowing the rules. It's really disengenuous of them (or for people on their behalf) to whine about how unfair the rules are. Nobody worries about the unfairness of the rules that say a mail-order outfit that uses USPS for delivery falls under the rules of the Postmaster for things like mail fraud (a federal offense), but a local brick and mortar doesn't. Why is one unfair advantage good but the other one bad?

    238. Re:You can't eliminate them by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2

      No. The final price is what you pay for the item. The receipt should spell out how much goes to the government. And tax rates are pretty clearly spelled out and public information, not hidden. Friendly warning, you're heading to nutter territory. A receipt without the price, tax, and total would be an issue between you and the store, and the "hidden government tax" you fear is more likely the store putting a tent pole in its profits.

      Also, if you read more and typed less, you might figure out there are a few ways to adjust your withholding so that it comes out as close to even as possible. Most people seem to want that check, since they are unable to save money and allow the government to do it for them. The government might make a little extra money on the float, but the IRS, and Congress generally, wants it to come out as close to even as possible.

      It's called a W-4, and the IRS instructions, and position, are pretty clearly spelled out here.
      http://www.irs.gov/publications/p919/index.html

    239. Re:You can't eliminate them by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Even the national price of products would be trivial. Advertise the final price, and back calculate the taxes. Sure the company would make a little more money in some areas, but that doesn't really pose a problem.

    240. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice if the federal government lowered the total sales tax in my state to 7%. My county is 8% (4% state 4% county), but the one next to mine is 9.25%.

      How would the municipality make up for lost revenue using your scheme?

    241. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was not an "issue", it was by design. The purpose of the tax reduction was to give restaurants more money, so thay would hire more people.

      (If the government wanted to leave consumers more money, why would they lower the taxes specifically on restaurants?)

    242. Re:You can't eliminate them by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      I concur. Although given the populace, the difference between 'riot' and 'armed rebellion' would be hard to distinguish.

      I'd join them. I've paid income tax, that's enough regressive taxation. The cost of living here isn't quite on the level of e.g. Manhattan or Honolulu, but average wages are much lower. Things were better in the days of cheap oil; we'd better get on the nuclear bandwagon if we want any future for the state.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    243. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there were people who stand outside places that people visit regularly and provide a convenient pot for people to deposit money in. Someone should get right on that.

    244. Re:You can't eliminate them by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Prior to 1913 inflation in the US was non-existant. Since 1913 inflation has average a little over 3% (dollar is 5% of its old value). 1913 was when the federal reserve was established.

      Fiat currency is a clever way for the government to steal from everybody else with most of them never even noticing it.

    245. Re:You can't eliminate them by dryeo · · Score: 1

      What happens on the days when there is close to no business? When my sister was working in the restaurant business she said that the only good days tip wise was the weekends due to lack of business during the week.
      Tipping here is about the same rate and it is generally excepted that you should always tip and tips are supposed to be reported as income.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    246. Re:You can't eliminate them by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You get rid of the nickle, and switch from the $0.25 piece to a $0.20 piece.

    247. Re:You can't eliminate them by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Although given the populace, the difference between 'riot' and 'armed rebellion' would be hard to distinguish.

      You got that right. I don't think I've been to a more well-armed state. It would just be bad news all around...

    248. Re:You can't eliminate them by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've never received poor service in Europe. I receive different service due to cultural differences- they don't try to turn tables as fast as possible, they wait until asked to bring a check- because the other way is considered rude to them. But the quality of service I receive is on par with what I get in the US, without tip. If I could trade our system for theirs I would in a heartbeat.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    249. Re:You can't eliminate them by dryeo · · Score: 2

      You guys need some serious sales tax reform. Here in Canada there is the Federal GST (5%), the Provincial sales tax (7% here, varies on province) with I believe most of the provinces now having a harmonized sales tax that the feds collect and distribute the provinces portion back.
      The cities and such do add extra things like the gas tax which is included in the price at the pump. To the west of me there is an extra 12% gas tax so locally often gas is a couple of cents cheaper here and the gas companies make extra profit.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    250. Re:You can't eliminate them by aix+tom · · Score: 4, Informative

      The other thing is, that I haven't seen any *broad* advertising like TV ads, billboards, etc... with *prices* for specific products here in Europe (Germany) for ages. I vaguely remember some from the TV in the 70s or so, but not in the last few decades. (Special offers for special car editions being one exception that just came to mind.)

      The only regular advertisement with prices is the weekly flyers from specific stores that clog up the mail box, and then of course the signs in the actual store or shop.

    251. Re:You can't eliminate them by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I think all fees and taxes should have to be stated up front. You should sign up for a cell phone contract for $69.99 and end up paying $87.32 each month. Banks should display every fee in their lobby and on the front page of their websites.

    252. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which clearly maps onto the tens:

      Onety, Twoty, Threety, Forty!

    253. Re:You can't eliminate them by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Yes a dime is 10 cents. Quarters are a lot more common. This is probably due to two factors.
      1. People give change in the largest denomination coins possible.
      2. Coins in denominations larger than the quarter (half and dollar coin) do not get used. They are generally minted solely for collectors.

      So when you get back change of, lets say, $0.87, you'd get 3 quarters, 1 dime, and 2 pennies.

      If I regularly went through a 40 cent toll like that, I would get rolls of dimes to use for the tolls.

    254. Re:You can't eliminate them by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Most foreign nations are states, USA happens to be a collection of states. It would be equally true to say "The United States [of America] is..." because you are talking about the country as a single entity, or "The United States [of America] are..." because not every state is on board.

      http://www.chompchomp.com/terms/collectivenoun.htm

      As you pointed out, people more generally assume you are talking about the country and not the collection of states when you say "United States" or "US", and therefore "is" has evolved to be the most natural fit.

      Your link does nothing to settle the singular/plural question, it simply reflects common usage to refer to the country as a whole instead of the individual states together.

      It became more common right before the War Between the States, and right after, having a clear difference of opinion, people referred to the states as an individual collection. After that anomaly, the trend resumed.

      Depending on usage, either way is still correct. The only thing that changed is the assumption that we are talking about the country as a whole. That would be expected as a country matures. Considering that most of the country was a stable size by around 1850, then the anomaly, then Alaska was acquired, a case could be made that it is more a sign of geopolitical stability than anything related to grammar.

    255. Re:You can't eliminate them by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Ever walk into a cellular phone store, or a bank?

    256. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF. Tipping for waiters is not "ingrained", it is just how the law currently stands. It is not some grand philosophical social contract, it is how the law currently exists. Lots of people other than Europeans don't tip including most Americans until they are informed of the situation. The horrible service in Europe you describe is not a lack of service but a lack of servility. The restaurant owners are pretty much the only ones that care deeply about this.

    257. Re:You can't eliminate them by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Your constitution does have an amending process. Be nice if they used it, then the States could decide.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    258. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should up it to 44 cents!

    259. Re:You can't eliminate them by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Hoosiers seem to enjoy getting screwed over. Around me, the republicans run for most offices unopposed, because nobody will vote for a democrat. People then bitch about corruption...

    260. Re:You can't eliminate them by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      welcome to my friend list, if I only had a mod point.

    261. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Splitting hairs here, but electors are "supposed" to go with the results of the popular vote. Since the electoral college is a state issue, rather than federal, there are different laws at work depending on what state you're talking about.

      The ever trustworthy wikipedia says only 24 states have laws on the books *requiring* electors to vote with the popular vote. Everyone usually does, but if there really was a "Ron Paul Revolution" in one or all of those 26 states, there wouldn't be as much legal recourse (though there'd certainly be supreme court level arguments).

      In addition, Nebraska and Maine don't follow the Winner-take-all philosophy that the other 48 states do. Their votes are awarded proportionally, though practically this hasn't changed they way the states votes have been awarded.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    262. Re:You can't eliminate them by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I was in Denmark in the last days of their "penny" back in 1989ish... it was a cute little thing, maybe 5mm in diameter.

    263. Re:You can't eliminate them by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please remember:
      Illinois base Sales Tax is 6.25%.
      Dupage County Sales Tax is 1%.
      Oakbrook Sales tax is .5%
      Cook County Sales tax is 2%.
      The Chicago Municipal Tax is 1.5%.
      The use tax in Chicago is 1% for anything bought from a retailer.
      There is a 2.25% tax applied to drugs and groceries in Chicago.
      There is an additional 3% tax on soft drinks.
      There is a 1% tax on prepared foods and beverages.

      Is Amazon a retailer? Do they need to apply the 1% use tax?

      O_O

      WTF?

      That's crazy. We have a 10% GST that it's required to be included in the sale price of an item. If we want something to sell for $9.99, then the actual ex-GST price of the item is $9.08.

      That is all.

    264. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Not true. The absolute *best* (theoretical) use of dollar coins is to pay off any (purely theoretical) winnings in (theoretical) super bowl, march madness, or fantasy football / baseball / hockey / MLS / UEFA / Cricket league prize pools.

      In a piece of short fiction that I wrote about a fantasy football league I ran, I paid the winner his several hundred dollars by filling a wooden(ish) box with PIRATE DOUBLOONS (or gold dollars, but it's more fun to call them pirate doubloons)! Was it awesome? It certainly would have been had it happened in real life.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    265. Re:You can't eliminate them by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Ah, different customs. Living in Europe and having been to America and Japan, it's interesting to see how different cultures work.

      For example, tipping in Japan IS terribly rude. On the other hand, NOT tipping in the US also is terribly rude also. At least visitors to Europe have no "terribly rude" trap in regards to tipping to fall into, the just can be considered "mildly rude" not to tip at all, or "exceedingly generous" when tipping on the US level.

      "astonishingly poor service" might also be a cultural thing. For example, in none but the most-exclusive restaurants here in my neck of the woods will you be seated. You just go in, look for a table you like, and sit down. And there will be no waiter asking you every 10minutes if everything is all right or you need anything, unless your glass or plate is empty, or you look at him or wave him over.

      The waiter / customer relationship is a little less servant / master, it's more of equals, where one is doing his job of bringing you food to the table. On the other hand, we have a LOT of Mom and Pop restaurants where you can get home made food and get served at the table for "Fast food joint" prices.

      "I realize how strange it is to visitors, but this is just the way our society is." ;-P

    266. Re:You can't eliminate them by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Buying penny sweets must be awesome there...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    267. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, there's a trade-off to not tipping, such as the astonishingly poor service that Europeans seem to take for granted at anything less than very high-end dining establishments.

      I see it as the other way around. It's Americans who have taken tips for granted.

      It's not a trade off to not tip. It's a choice. If Europeans wanted the better service, they would choose to pay extra and go to high-end places. They choose not to, and the servers reacted appropriately.

      Whereas in America, tipping is "expected", a "social contract" as you said. So even if the service is NOT good, servers still expect a tip.

      And this "expectation" in America leads to a smaller range of choice. At the bottom is fast food, but then anything past a certain level above that is "expected" to have service, and thus a tip.

      Whereas when there's no expectation in Europe, restaurants can decide the exact level of service/tip ratio. The consumers get more choice and decide which level of service vs tip they prefer.

      In other words, to finish this dish off with some political/partisan spice...

      Europe and elsewhere has a free market in tipping
      America has a socialized tipping system where people feel entitled to a tip ;p

    268. Re:You can't eliminate them by tarsiermiller · · Score: 0

      Is it required that stores add tax at the register, or could they choose to label items as "tax included"? I assume they use the current method so people think they are getting a better price, but if everyone used this method as a way to eliminate the cent and/or nickel then it would not be an issue.

    269. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The habit is so ingrained in us that it's very difficult to _not_ tip when traveling abroad. It just seems terribly rude."
      So you refuse to adopt to local norms when you travel abroad.

      "I wish however that Europeans were more willing to adopt to local norms when coming to the US."
      But you expect foreigners to adopt local norms when travelling to the US.

      Nice double standard, as only Americans are capable of.

    270. Re:You can't eliminate them by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Yes, because "it isn't constitutional" has stopped our government from doing so many things over the years.

      This is one of those things that an amendment would be worth IMO.

    271. Re:You can't eliminate them by mianne · · Score: 1

      And how would you pay someone if the total was $3.15, you had the dollars, a couple dimes, but you didn't have a quarter? The penny needs to disappear yesterday! Also, eliminate the dollar bill, so people will finally adapt to using the billions of dollar coins which are now languishing in federal vaults. But I see no practical way to eliminate the nickel as long as a quarter represents $0.25. And messing with that would pretty much gum up the works and annoy everyone.

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    272. Re:You can't eliminate them by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      Dang, they need to start putting dimes in a roll, they could market them for tolls. At least then the locals would be able to not pay the extra 10 cents ...



      sheesh.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    273. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just declare that quarters are now worth 20 cents! Perfect way to reduce the national debt.

    274. Re:You can't eliminate them by Petaris · · Score: 1

      There is no tipping in Japan either, but the service is certainly not poor. I know you were talking about Europe, but it doesn't have to be that way. I think its just used as an excuse to not have to pay the wait staff minimum wage. I would rather have to pay more for my meal then to have to pay a tip. I don't begrudge the wait staff on this, just the establishment.

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    275. Re:You can't eliminate them by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Because the fed works so well with everything else? this would also kill local initiatives dead. for example since the city I live in is VERY good at not trying to extend a tax and kills it at the voter approved time it wasn't difficult for them to come before the people and say 'It would be helpful if we had a main linkup between the business district and the freeway that would allow one to go from one end to another while bypassing the most congested parts of town thereby moving the large trucks off the main drag" and they got a 2c sales tax for 4 years approved which paid for the linkup.

      So allow me to say a hearty "Hell no!" to a national sales tax. I still have at least some measure of say in local politics and can use grass roots to affect the outcome. As we have seen time and time again unless your last name is Gates you can give it up when it comes to affecting the fed, you just replace one shill with another. that 7% would quickly become 7,8,9,10,11,etc as they came up with one excuse after another to pass their spending off on the poor, meanwhile the rich would just do their large purchases overseas and keep their money in the Caymans like old Mittens does.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    276. Re:You can't eliminate them by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

      I would like to pay that with debit card

    277. Re:You can't eliminate them by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I shouldn't have said required. I knew that wasn't exactly accurate but it may as well be. I imagine the only reason why the electoral system still exists is because it pretty much always does happen to agree with the popular vote. If it regularly disagreed with the outcome of the popular vote people would see how broken the system really is.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    278. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that help? Then they only get 6c extra from the unprepared.

    279. Re:You can't eliminate them by Endo13 · · Score: 2

      Yes, lets just throw all our pennies in the salvation army buckets and fill them up, that way they get to stand in the cold all day for ten bucks in donations.

      But seriously, before you make any more snarky comments please do a google image search for "1,000 pennies" so you can see how many it takes to make a measly ten bucks. They're not worth it, no matter how "convenient" it is to collect them. It's about as useful as pissing on a forest fire. In the mean time, I'll keep throwing my pennies in the trash and drop a buck in your collection pot instead, like I usually do.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    280. Re:You can't eliminate them by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      How does the electoral system help? It makes it so we only have to care about the votes in a handful of swing states at most, but that's not a good thing in my book.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    281. Re:You can't eliminate them by OneMadMuppet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm European and in NYC for the first time this week. It's astounding how many people expect a tip for what is mediocre or poor service (or at least would be back home) because of the "social contract". If people expect me to pay a tip no matter what, it would be easier to just pay them properly, charge a little more, and pay tips to people who actually deserve them.

    282. Re:You can't eliminate them by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      The result would be largely revenue-neutral, since the total of state and local sales taxes averages about 7% already.

      Try telling that to people that live in states with no sales tax.

      Also, note that prohibiting state sales taxes would probably require a constitutional amendment.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    283. Re:You can't eliminate them by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      Not quite...
      Here are the city tax rates for Arizona. Chandler has 1.5%, Phoenix 2%. Your number included the State sales tax.
      Apache Junction sales tax: 2.2%
      Avondale sales tax: 2.5%
      Buckeye sales tax: 3.0%
      Carefree sales tax: 3.0%
      Cave Creek sales tax: 3.0%
      Chandler sales tax: 1.5%
      El Mirage sales tax: 3.0%
      Fountain Hills sales tax: 2.6%
      Gila Bend sales tax: 3.0%
      Gilbert sales tax: 1.5%
      Glendale sales tax: 2.2%
      Goodyear sales tax: 2.5%
      Guadalupe sales tax: 3.0%
      Litchfield Park sales tax: 2.8%
      Maricopa sales tax: 2.0%
      Mesa sales tax: 1.75%
      Paradise Valley sales tax: 1.65%
      Peoria sales tax: 1.8%
      Phoenix sales tax: 2.0%
      Queen Creek sales tax: 2.25%
      Scottsdale sales tax: 1.65%
      Surprise sales tax: 2.2%
      Tempe sales tax: 2.0%
      Tolleson sales tax: 2.5%
      Wickenburg sales tax: 2.2%
      Youngtown sales tax: 3.0%

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    284. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Clerks don't do this anymore, they rely upon the cash register. It's pretty sad actually, especially when the power goes down and they can't even give out correct change by counting.

    285. Re:You can't eliminate them by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      There ARE some states that do not have ANY sales tax.

      I dare say they'd be a bit miffed by having to implement one.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    286. Re:You can't eliminate them by n7ytd · · Score: 1

      One thing is clear: you sure are gettin' screwed in Chicago.

    287. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I do know people who will tip 20% even for obviously bad service. It's just ingrained in them. Also everyone wants to round up instead of down when doing the math in their heads. It would be nice to have this in the paycheck so that you could actually reward for good service instead of taking for granted that adequate service always gets a tip no matter what. Also I see the restaurants that say they share the tips equally with all the staff; nice that the normally unnoticed busser actually gets part of the tip but it completely removes the incentive to do better than the other servers.

      Actually a think some workers might be resistant to automatic service charge, as it makes hiding the tips from the taxes a lot harder.

    288. Re:You can't eliminate them by reverius · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a 3rd world country. Maybe they should try having more taxes and less riots.

    289. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Taxes aren't hidden with VAT, it's there if you look at your receipt.

    290. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's a US headache. Sales tax for city plus county plus state, and sometimes a regional sales tax (a water basin district). Technically the taxes could all go to the state and then the state hands it back out to local municipalities, but that doesn't work because the states love to hang onto that cash or apply it to their budget shortfall. So if a town wants to improve its library system they need to have local sales taxes because the money won't come from the county, state, or feds.

    291. Re:You can't eliminate them by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I think what residieu was trying to say is... if someone has, say, about 10,000 pennies that they are trying to unload, how much paper cash would you be willing to exchange for it? Obviously no more than $100, but unless you are required to accept all those pennies in exchange for $100, you'd likely say something like "Hell no! For the inconvenience of that much luggage, I'll give you $10 for it."

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    292. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But the problem is that the money probably won't trickle back down to the local areas. California has this problem currently as the budget shortfall gets first dibs and then there's nothing left over to send to the counties and cities despite earlier promises.

    293. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The civil cold war never ended.

    294. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In Finland I tried to get a 1 or 5 cent euro coins, but never did get the 1 cent and only 1 5 cent. Basically everything was rounded in price anyway; nothing cost 1.99, or 1.95 and even a 1.90 was somewhat rare. So one time I did get a bill that had an odd number of cents (candy priced by weight of how much you scooped up). I was expecting to finally get my 1 cent coin. But I was given change rounded in my favor, even though the receipt itself showed the odd price.

    295. Re:You can't eliminate them by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      I asked my son and I had spoken incorrectly. He makes $2.13 an hour and if tips don't bring the the rate up to minimum wage the employer makes up the difference.

    296. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who used to get rolls of them at the bank and then use them, hoping to drive up the circulation and make them more common, plus he'd trade you one for a dollar bill as well sometimes. The few times I used them the clerks would sometimes look at them funny before accepting them.

      The dollar coins in the US just don't catch on. The Eisenhower Dollar was just big and bulky, probably because it tried to have a proportionate amount of metal compared to a quarter and half dollar. So no one liked it and wasn't used much outside of gambling slot machines. Then the Susan B Anthony dollar was just poorly designed and too easily confused with a quarter dollar. The Sacagawea dollar I like the best, easy to distinguish from other coins, even by feel. But it just didn't take off.

      Almost no vending machines take them so they're useless there, even though many machines will take dollar bills (after many retries). The only machines that take them tend to be mass transit ticket machines. The big reason probably is that the dollar bill is in circulation. It just doesn't make sense to have both a coin and a paper bill of the same denomination. In Europe I found the 1 and 5 euro coin to be extremely convenient and natural in contrast.

      The real reason probably is that we're American. We do things our own way. If someone else has a great idea then we tend to ignore it, because it wasn't our own idea.

    297. Re:You can't eliminate them by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Probably trying to count this stuff out while in the car and at the toll booth is cumbersome. Quarters are easy to pick out of your pocket or a tray. Now if someone was smart they might want to count this stuff up in advance and have the 4 dimes ready, but that would mean thinking ahead...

    298. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't see the difference between short-changing someone and giving them money they didn't expect?

      My first trip to the UK, I gave a waitress a decent tip and she was ecstatic. When a bartender later explained the situation to me, I didn't lose any sleep over having given that nice girl a few extra pounds.

    299. Re:You can't eliminate them by unrtst · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True story...

      On returning from a lunch break, my coworkers and I were talking about if anyone would pick up a penny in the parking lot. Most would not, some would. So the question - how much would someone have to pay you to pick up a penny (for those that normally would not). We worked in IT at a call center. We came up with an testing idea...

      The bathroom was filthy - it's a call center. We put a two quarters in each urinal. Then we went back to check on it 30 minutes later. How long would it take for those piss covered quarters to be picked out of the urinals?

      First check (30min), they were all gone.

      So we just put a single quarter in there, and re-checked in 15 minutes. It was gone already.

      So we put a dime in one, a nickle and 2 pennies in another, and a penny in another. In 15 minutes, the dime and nickle were gone, but the pennies remained. We checked again about 20minutes later, and the group of pennies was gone, but the lone penny remained. We were working too, and if memory serves, we missed the next scheduled check, but the all change was gone on the next check.

      We continued playing with amounts throughout the following days. Quarters went very very quickly, as if no one had any reservations on fishing them out of a well used urinal. We had been thinking that, just maybe, we got unlucky with the timing, and the cleaning staff was grabbing them... but we were all eventually 100% convinced that was not the case - they went to fast, and too often, and cleaning staff didn't make rounds anywhere near that much.

      We spent about 2 weeks of randomly tossing loose change in urinals and cracking up about how it vanished so quickly into the hands of call takers - all using shared phones, keyboards, mice, etc. We were having a swell old time with it.

      Then one day, we were in the common breakroom, and one of us bought a soda with a dollar. They got back 30 cents in change (a quarter and a nickle), and readily picked it up and pocketed it. Two and two became four in my head.... I asked my coworker where he thought that change came from.

      We stopped putting change in the urinal that day, and took a long hiatus from grabbing the change from the vending machine.

      If you ever see someone leaving their change in a vending machine, think twice before you judge them :-)

    300. Re:You can't eliminate them by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      That sales tax thing isn't actually an American thing, it's a state & city thing. Two towns in the same county will often have different tax rates. It gets even weirder though, as it sometimes depends on what you're buying too.

      Some things I buy, I'll actually cross the street and buy at a different place because the rates are significantly different. It's a pain, but I'm not sure what the alternative is.

    301. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because "it isn't constitutional" has stopped our government from doing so many things over the years.

      It most certainly has. Are you completely ignorant of US legal history?

      Reasonable people will disagree over the constitutionality of many of our current laws. However, your implication that unconstitutional laws are never or rarely struck down is absurd.

    302. Re:You can't eliminate them by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Heheh, damn my old memory! I screwed up the initial drop amount, and the original question!

      In the parking lot, the question was not how much to pick a penny up from the lot, but how much would I have to pay you (coworker) to pick a penny out of the urinal? There was a common thread to the answers (got to a low of $20, and up to thousands), but one guy wouldn't do it for any amount. So we focused on that... what about a million dollars? Answer: OF COURSE! So then it was just a matter of negotiating the price down... we'd all do it for some amount. What about the call takers?

      The initial drop was 51 cents - two quarters and a penny. Easy way to see if someone would pick up a penny out of the urinal for 50 cents without asking them. We have no idea how long it took, but it was less than 30 minutes. The rest followed from there.

    303. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      humor

    304. Re:You can't eliminate them by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      I do know people who will tip 20% even for obviously bad service. It's just ingrained in them.

      I do this. My grandmother was a single mother of two surviving on tips as a waitress, so I can't help it. When service is mediocre, I assume they've just had a bad day and try to be extra nice. It might be counter-productive, even stupid, but I'll leave it for someone else to figure out. They work harder than most of my coworkers for less money, and I couldn't sleep at night knowing I decreased someones paycheck.

      What I do like is that restaurants will typically put the tip in on large bills as a mandatory line item to make sure nobody gets screwed on lots of work. This solves the problem of foreigners and local cheapskates screwing over the staff.

    305. Re:You can't eliminate them by thogard · · Score: 1

      Adding the tax after helps keep it down. Compare the sales tax rate in the US where its added in clear view of the consumer vs in Europe where it isn't? In the US it ranges from about 0% to 13% with most in the 4 to 8% range. VAT in the EU is 15 to 27% When its hidden, its much easier to hide increases and it tends to be done in greater steps as well.

    306. Re:You can't eliminate them by similar_name · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't cost $3.15 it would cost $3.20. When you get a gallon of gas do you pay the 9/10 of a cent? It's the same concept. However, you are correct that getting rid of the nickel would mean getting rid of the quarter. Without the acceptance of $1 coins or the even less used $.50 coins, this posses a significant barrier to dropping the second decimal place of the dollar and its associated coins.

    307. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That is kind of the point of a nationwide identical tax on things, allowing stores to write out price stickers showing exactly what you're paying without having to calculate which part is tax etc.

      You don't need a nationwide tax for things on that. You just need a regulation that requires stores to include sales tax into the price. And said regulation can be enacted by the states themselves.

    308. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That's meant as a serious question; as a European I obviously don't know anything about what advantages there may be to seeing the price before the tax you'll end up paying at the register anyway

      One advantage that is subtle, but present, is that citizens are constantly reminded of just how much they pay in sales tax. So it's that much harder to jack it up, because everyone immediately noticed not only the higher prices, but knows whom to blame for them.

      The whole HST debacle in British Columbia is a good case in point.

    309. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Impose a 7% national sales tax, payable to the federal government. At the same time, prohibit states and localities from collecting their own sales taxes. The result would be largely revenue-neutral, since the total of state and local sales taxes averages about 7% already. Have the federal government distribute this money on a regular basis to states (6%) and localities (1%), based on some weighted formula that takes into account population, economic activity, or both.

      What about states who specifically don't want to collect sales tax, and compensate budget by higher income tax instead, because they see sales tax as detrimental to their economy - like, say, Oregon?

      US is a federation for a reason. One of those reasons is that different states can and do have different tax regimes, because people disagree on which way is optimal.

    310. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution: Congress has the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof, etc. FEDERAL.

      And how does this apply to ads?

      Article 1, Section 8 also contains the Commerce Clause, by which basis the FEDERAL government enacted (15 USC 45, and FTC regulations associated) laws and protections for consumers against false and misleading advertising.

      Commerce Clause is only meant to be applicable to interstate commerce. Unfortunately, as time went by, it became the favorite clause to justify various forms of crap - ever since the idiotic SCOTUS decision which redefined "interstate" as any activity that may have influence on commerce across state borders - including any commercial and even non-commercial activity that by itself is restricted within the state. Basically, you selling me a donut for a penny can be argued as "interstate commerce" under this interpretation, because by doing so you're affecting the price of donuts in neighboring states due to supply and demand.

      Generally speaking, due to the aforementioned abuse, whenever Commerce Clause is brought up to justify constitutionality of something, it should be suspect by default in light of past experience. In this case, however, I very much doubt that even a very broadly reinterpreted Commerce Clause would give Congress power to regulate local ads, or price labels in a brick & mortar store.

    311. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean, "elv, twen, thrir, for"?

    312. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In Russia, the cost of a matchbox used to be exactly 1 kopek. So it would often be used as change instead of the coin.

    313. Re:You can't eliminate them by quenda · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's a trade-off to not tipping, such as the astonishingly poor service

      Classic correlation/causation error there. Service is better in the US across the board, not just from people who expect tips.

    314. Re:You can't eliminate them by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The Feds do legitimately have the right to regulate interstate travel.

      This isn't travel.

      This would fit very clearly and legitimately within the Interstate Commerce clause.

      Yes, in the modern world where everything fits under the ICC, it does, but in a world where words have meaning and actions have consequences it certainly does not. The Feds do NOT have the right to levy a state sales tax, nor do they have the right to prohibit a state from levying one.

      I would guess that consumers and retailers would very quickly put a huge amount of pressure on their local representatives to stick to the Federal sales tax guidelines.

      I would guess that you'd have 50 state attorneys-general in federal court suing to overturn such a ridiculous power grab on the part of the feds before the consumers could even say "boo".

    315. Re:You can't eliminate them by quenda · · Score: 1

      If you get rid of the nickel, you essentially need to get rid of the quarter.

      Interesting. Could this be why every other country on earth* has (or had) 20 cent coins instead of 25c?

      (*except the semi-autonomous Northern Provinces of the US)

    316. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in the USA and I honestly see this as a way of the restaurant to stiff their servers on their paycheck and forcing the customers to make up for it. I honestly wouldn't see it that way if many of them kept their food prices at reasonable prices but when they get to the point where you are paying $22 to feed a single person a medium sized meal (about the size of a large Burger King combo) and then expecting us to be willing to pay even more to pay the servers pay cause their pay is lowered and expected to be made up by tips, you can't help but think the places is getting over on their servers and using you to make up for it.

    317. Re:You can't eliminate them by arose · · Score: 1

      I'll take a clear statement of the applicable taxes before reaching the register, preferably upon entry for a start.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    318. Re:You can't eliminate them by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      They get value for those higher taxes, mostly free education for as far as they can go, universal medical coverage for nearly half of what Americans pay per person on average, unemployment and retirement coverage. It mostly works out pretty well for them.

    319. Re:You can't eliminate them by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's a trade-off to not tipping, such as the astonishingly poor service that Europeans seem to take for granted

      Why is that inferior to a system where staff need to almost prostitute themselves to get extra money from strangers instead of being paid by their boss for the work they do?
      It's a bizzare little hangover from slavery which continues to exist because it's in the sort of jobs that only the poor in the USA would let their children do. In other parts of the world the girl that brings you your meal may have richer parents than yourself because it's not considered a demeaning job only fit for those that can't find anything better.

      when a visiting European declines to conform to local custom and stiffs a server even when he or she received good service... well you've just done the equivalent of taking money out of that server's paycheck for the night.

      It's because the rest of the world doesn't really understand such a barbaric custom unless it's spelled out to them. Hidden unspoken costs are what they are, and the concept of people that are working for a living also have to rely on the charity of strangers needs to be explained or the strangers do not know they have to hand out charity. I'm not European but you'll find the living off tips thing is really something limited to the USA and the third world. I'd be likely to upset people in a US cafe who would think I'm a cheap racist bastard for asking for a "short black" (small espresso) and not knowing to tip unless I remember I'm in a place where I have to hand out charity to underpaid workers. Land of the free my arse. You've built a new aristocracy that's getting just like the Europe that was so bad that the USA was intended to be completely different and egalitarian instead of aristocratic.
      Where I live some rich US tourists treat serving staff like shit because they don't get the fawning treatment they get at home from people that need those tips to survive. It's the same situation - people out of their depth on local customs look like complete arseholes because they either don't know to tip, how much to tip or conversely think that they should be treated like little aristocrats by serfs because they can throw a few coins on the table or withhold those coins. The same actually applies to people from my own country that have spent a lot of time in the third world and expect the same fawning treatment when they come back home. So there you go - third world attitudes of throwing crumbs to the peasants. It doesn't sound much like what the USA was supposed to be at the outset or what it pretends to have as values now does it?

    320. Re:You can't eliminate them by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's not a constitutional matter at all if the states agree. It can be done by having the federal body as a collection agency. Other countries do it that way.

    321. Re:You can't eliminate them by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Going back to Washington's day there is a parallel example of a wider range of differing local weights and measures. it's a matter of getting every price to mean the same thing instead of just throwing you hands up and saying it can't be done.

    322. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Australia where our lowest denomination is the 5 cent coin, and I can tell you that almost every price still ends in .99 (or occasionally, .98) despite it being completely impossible to produce with legal tender. They're quite happy to take that extra cent and tell you to have a nice day.

    323. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia has a nationwide 10% tax. I don't know whether it's enforced, but I have never seen tax not included in the prices since it was standardized. You read and pay the same prices, then you get a little notification of how much of what you paid was tax on your receipt to complain to the government about. Having lived with this system most of my life the American way seems almost absurd.

    324. Re:You can't eliminate them by Unkl_Shvelven · · Score: 1

      Wow. Here in MD sales tax is 6% across the state, and groceries (excluding junk food, soda, etc.) are tax-free.

      --
      regular man whom love computer (Also, fuck beta).
    325. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole HST debacle in British Columbia is a good case in point.

      If you talk to British Columbians, you will find that a very large portion of those who voted to get rid of the HST and go back to separate GST and PST did so not because they disagreed with the principle of the HST, but because of the way it was implemented.

      In a parliamentary democracy, the parliament (legislature in the case of provinces) is the sole body allowed to impose taxes. In BC, the HST was imposed by Cabinet via an Order-in-Council. IMHO, and that of many other BCians, the HST in BC is unconstitutional.

      The referendum held in BC on the HST (after its imposition) did not allow for the expressions of that opinion, so we did what we could and voted against it.

    326. Re:You can't eliminate them by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I made a typing mistake. I didn't mean travel, I meant trade.

      That being said, saying what fees/taxes can be levied on products that are involved in Interstate Commerce is EXACTLY the kind of thing that the ICC was created for. The Feds are well known for abusing the ICC, but in a world where words have meaning, not only would it fit entirely and accurately into the ICC, but you would also realize that the Feds would not be collecting a state sales tax.

    327. Re:You can't eliminate them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I know - I lived in BC for two years, and was there when that shit hit the fan.

      However, I do think that the visibility of sales tax - due to it being in your receipts but not at price labels - did help to spread the word. Some people who would not have otherwise been interested found out about it when they suddenly had to pay more to the cashier, and from there they'd find out why and how things got to change that way.

    328. Re:You can't eliminate them by srone · · Score: 1

      That is true, I confuse clerks all the time by paying in bills with an amount of change that allows the change I receive to be quarters.

      Any change to something cheaper would most likely make the coins less durable, such as aluminum pennies and nickels.

      The best modification of our system would be to revalue the dollar, so that a copper (bronze) penny would be worth somewhat less than it's value in copper. Say like 10 old cents to 1 new cent and 10 old dollars equal to 1 new dollar. The only psychological damage would be due to everyone being paid one tenth as much in new dollars. As far as I am concerned, the exchange factor could be 25 to 1, rather than 10 to1, then dimes, quarters and half dollars could revert back to 90% silver as thy were pre 1965. This would require countries to balance their budgets every year to keep monetary values stable.

      I am sure this would never occur, as inflation is preferred by governments so that their true debt cost is smaller after a few years of inflation.

      --
      "Endeavour to persevere"
    329. Re:You can't eliminate them by doshell · · Score: 1

      Of course, there's a trade-off to not tipping, such as the astonishingly poor service that Europeans seem to take for granted at anything less than very high-end dining establishments. Now, it doesn't seem to bother you all so you might as keep it the way it is. Americans, on the other hand, seem to place a much higher value on careful and conscientious service, and that's why our pay structure for servers is the way it is--to promote that good service.

      That makes no sense to me. If you know (or are reasonably certain) that you're going to be tipped anyway, where's the incentive to provide a better service? On the other hand, if tipping is optional, you have a clear choice between putting in some effort (and maybe get a tip) or just do what you're supposed to in the most uninspiring way possible (and sure as hell not get one).

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    330. Re:You can't eliminate them by dryeo · · Score: 1

      That makes more sense but still, at least here, minimum wage is so low and tips are supposed to supplement your earnings being a bonus that it really seems your sons employer is taking advantage of him and I guess that's the norm there, at least in the restaurant business.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    331. Re:You can't eliminate them by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The gas companies will take advantage of stuff like this. Where I live (BC) gas is about $1.23 per litre to the east and $1.25 to the west. The stations to the west have an extra 12 cents transit tax (plus 5% tax on the tax) added to the pump price yet the stations to the east claim that they're only making a couple of cents a litre profit and the rest is taxes or raw price. They even have nice pie charts on the pumps showing the taxes etc. Also when the transit tax went up, gas went up everywhere.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    332. Re:You can't eliminate them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the situation there, but in the U.S., the different formulations that different areas are required to use because of EPA regulations cause unusual pricing situations. I happen to live on the border between two different gasoline formulations. Usually, the more rural area formulated gas is cheaper. However, under certain circumstances and do to transportation issues, the situation will reverse itself.
      In BC I could easily see there being a transportation cost that causes gasoline in the east to be as expensive as in the west. I could also imagine it being caused by government mandated formulation differences. Of course, it could also be a result of gasoline retailers taking advantage of people. My bet would be some combination of all three. I worked for as a convenience store manager that sold gas and was owned by a regional gasoline distribution company. There is a sweet spot between maximizing profit per gallon and maximizing volume sold. In the 90s, we had about a $0.05 range on the profit per gallon. Because we were owned by a distribution company, we had a pretty good idea what our competitors were paying for gas. When sales volumes were low and/or our competitors prices were low, we would drop our prices to about $0.02 per gallon above what we paid for it. When sales volumes were high and/or our competitors prices were high, we would raise our price to about $0.05 per gallon above what we paid for it. If we were at $0.02 per gallon above our cost and sales volumes were still low, we would usually raise our price to $0.07 above what we paid for it. The exception to that being when one of our competitors was selling gas below what we knew they could sustain, then we would drop our price to match theirs until they gave up.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    333. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe we have this curious idea called "labelling things with the price you pay".

      It's quite simple, really: instead of taking something labelled "$14.99" to the checkout and being charged $15.89 for it, you take something labelled â14.99 to the checkout and are charged â14.99 for it!

      Makes it much easier to present the right change, should you wish to, or to predict how much your total will come to without having to remember what the applicable tax rate is and then do mental arithmetic. I do not know why the fuck American stores don't do this.

    334. Re:You can't eliminate them by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      [quote]tipping in Japan IS terribly rude[/quote] Is it rude or just not done? I can hardly imagine someone working as a server in a country as expensive as Japan taking a whole lot of offense at being given more money than they are paid by the establishment.

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    335. Re:You can't eliminate them by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      It does depend location from location ("American" culture is not the same place to place), but generally speaking poor service means no tip, while good service means either a tip, or maybe a larger than usually expected tip (especially if you intend to return to the location). Not tipping might mean you ought not return to a location, except with a different server. While some here are commenting on "a tip is expected no matter what", that has not been my personal experience as an American, though I do try to take note of whether someone is being overworked and having a bad day such that even with mediocre service, if they try despite circumstances (or are near break down) I might give a small tip, and a few quick words in thanks or maybe a compliment or two, in encouragement.

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    336. Re:You can't eliminate them by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      'Er' yeah, they make up for a lake of sales tax by generating more revenue in that state by stealing it from adjoining states. Now if the adjoining states also had no sales tax, Oregon revenue base would collapsed forcing them to implement a sales tax. It's exactly the way tax havens work, the live by stealing the income from other countries money by allowing tax cheats and criminals to hide their ill gotten gains.

      A Federally based tax, negotiated by majority agreement by the states, with uniform taxes, at states and county level, helps to balance out income opportunities and hence create average lower taxes (the little guys, us, do not end copping it is the neck to make up the difference). All revenue would of course be collected and retained by the state but as a federal tax, no fucking corrupt bribe local or state officials tax cheats.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    337. Re:You can't eliminate them by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      If I were the seller I'd make a huge deal out of the fact that, by playing these games, you can get me to round the price down.

      Hell, I'll round down to the nearest *quarter* if you'll pay cash -- it's still cheaper than the 47 cent debit card fee.

      Depends on what you were selling. Consumers always assume that "cash is cheap to handle", which it may not be. For a small business whose average takings may be under $1000, cash is cheaper than debit/credit - they just make a run to the bank every few hours to deposit the takings, and they only risk losing that takings should you get robbed midway.

      But once you get bigger, or start having bigger ticket goods, cash is definitely not king. It costs money to handle cash - if you have to hire help, handling the cash register requires real bookkeeping ability. Basically, if you work the register, you must count how much is in your drawer before you start, then enter it in the register at the beginning. As the transactions go on, the register keeps track of drawer amounts. It's why if you see a cashier making change with another register, they often do a trade - e.g., trade a $10 bill for $10 worth of quarters because the entire amount is tracked. At the end of the shift, the contents of the drawer are counted and the results should agree (within a sloppiness factor - sometimes the cashier gives too much change, sometimes too little). It's why when the registers go down, the store often prefers to stop sales than manual transactions as those are a lot messier and there's often no way to update the registers when they come back up with the manual transactions.

      Checking out with credit/debit is far easier - the register just totals those and everyone's on their way - no drawer to keep track of.

      Now, what to do with the piles of cash? It has to be put int he bank. If it's significant (say, $10,000 or more), then an armored car might be hired, which costs money. If a lot of people use cash, then it may be a regular thing. If it's a night deposit, then someone needs to go to the bank and make the deposit (risking robbery or elaborate scams). Or if the bank is open, having to line up to make the deposit (and it can take a while, costing time).

      All this is part of the cost of accepting cash - it's why many businesses don't mind credit and debit fees because if it saves them having to run to the bank every few hours or to worry about robbery, the cost of an armored car service if necessary, or even the added training required to handle cash.

      I suppose the ones that have the problem are the computer stores that do the cash discount thing and they can easily have $20,000 in daily takings... having to make those deposits (and a robbery can easily sink the company). The margin isn't high enough to hire an armored car, either.

    338. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you also going to ban local income and/or property taxes?

      I live in a state with no sales tax so this would be a straight up 7% tax hike on already taxed money.

    339. Re:You can't eliminate them by mariasama16 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of the store clerks just have to count out what the machine tells them to do. Any higher order math is not needed, and with plastic becoming more and more prevalent as a payment method, even that is becoming less necessary.

    340. Re:You can't eliminate them by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      We only give a tip if we've been treated above and beyond the ordinary, since the serving staff at a given restaurant actually collects a paycheck. You should try that system sometime. :-)

      If we wanted shitty service we would.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    341. Re:You can't eliminate them by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      It's rude, since in the cultural context it places he server on the level of a beggar instead of a professional who does his job. It's received more as a "I'm sorry for you, you look so poor and wretched" than "you did a good job" when you just give more money than was asked in the bill.

      One way around that problem when the service was really excellent is to give a tip separately from the bill payment process in an envelope while personally thanking the person you give the tip to. But never, never, ever just cash money carelessly with a "keep the change"

    342. Re:You can't eliminate them by xaxa · · Score: 1

      If you get rid of the nickel, you essentially need to get rid of the quarter.

      Interesting. Could this be why every other country on earth* has (or had) 20 cent coins instead of 25c?

      No, that's because it makes change a bit more efficient. If your coins are 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, etc (1x, 2x, 5x, x is 1, 10, 100 etc) you almost always need less coins to make change than if your coins are 1, 5, 10 and 25.

    343. Re:You can't eliminate them by John3 · · Score: 1

      Our POS system steers anything under $25 to credit card and does not prompt for a signature, so the discount rate isn't a killer. We wind up paying 2% plus a couple of cents, which still sucks for a small sale but is better than the debit flat fee of .25 (or whatever it currently is). Thankfully for retailers the debit fees were dropped last fall.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    344. Re:You can't eliminate them by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      So you're British too, then?

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    345. Re:You can't eliminate them by jecblackpepper · · Score: 1

      Except in Marks and Spencer where all prices are to the whole pound. To me that always seem more honest and it saves them having to have a lot of pennies in their tills. They just need notes and pound coins.

    346. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (FWIW I live in the UK where consumer-oriented prices *are* usually quoted with VAT (i.e. sales tax) included and prefer it that way- but that's because we have uniform VAT across the country. I understand why the US doesn't include it.)

      I live in the Netherlands where it is mandatory for stores that deliver to consumers, to quote prices including VAT/Sales Tax.

      I wish it was mandatory/allowed to list prices *excluding* VAT as in the US. This is because this way, people will have a better feeling of just how much they are paying the government. Your receipt will ofcourse show the amount, but if you go to the checkout with an item costing 100 euro, and you end up paying 119 euro, every time it will give people a sense of how much money the government takes from them. There's a reason sales tax in the US is 10 or 12% lower than our 19% and I like to think this is one of the reasons.

      (To be fair, some items are taxed at a lower rate of 6% which includes most necessities such as food, water etc.)

    347. Re:You can't eliminate them by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      The one dollar bill is the thing we should really be eliminating. They're expensive to produce relative to their value (nearly 10 cents a bill) and the average lifetime is 42 months before they wear out. The dollar coin lasts 25 times as long and the buying power of one is similar to what a quarter was when I was a kid. It would save money to eliminate the dollar bill and use dollar coins instead.

    348. Re:You can't eliminate them by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      Oregon ftw: 0% Sales Tax.

    349. Re:You can't eliminate them by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      50 state attorneys-general

      Thanks for getting the plural right. Almost no one ever does.

    350. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " If a business feels that the 99-cent or $4.99 or $9.99 or $99.99 price point is important, they'll figure out a way to reduce the cost of their product so it hits that price point even with tax already included. So, in the long run, it is likely to save consumers money."

      Or they will add a dollar to the price which is much easier than trying to reduce to end at the 99 point. ;-)

    351. Re:You can't eliminate them by Lazarian · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it wasn't my intention to be snarky. Perhaps I should have worded it a little better though. All I meant was that a few pennies in the change box at the grocery line does contribute toward whatever charities that may be, and it does make a difference in the long run.

    352. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serving staff in the US is leaps and bounds above what you find in Europe.

    353. Re:You can't eliminate them by Endo13 · · Score: 0

      and it does make a difference in the long run.

      No, it really doesn't. Not with pennies. It just doesn't matter how you spin it. Pennies are a waste of time. Even just counting and wrapping them costs more than they're worth.

      You really aren't doing anyone any favors by giving them pennies.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    354. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should come to Norway, we pay 25% taxes for all purchases.

    355. Re:You can't eliminate them by swalve · · Score: 1

      There was a time when the businesses at the intersection of Mannheim and St. Charles road had the highest sales tax in the nation. IL + Cook County + Bellwood + a TIF district. I think it went away after Cook County reduced the sales tax again.

    356. Re:You can't eliminate them by swalve · · Score: 1

      I think that's because the 50c piece is heavier than two quarters, and you can make any change without them. Stores aren't going to bother with them.

    357. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I see on the shelf is exactly what I pay.

      Your obviasly a communist if you think that's a good thing.

    358. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... just Wow!!
      I'm in Australia, which by USA standards seems to have what the US would call a socialist big government (almost free healthcare for all, unemployment benefits, subsidised medicines and more) and there is no sales tax at all, anywhere. We got rid of that ridiculous complexity in 2000.
      There is a GST, aka VAT, of 10% on the vast majority of purchases and the advertised price includes this tax, so what you see is what you pay.
      So the Australian system seems far far simpler to administer, calculate, collect, report and then the federal government pays back the collected GST to the various states according to some complex system, it doesn't keep any of the GST collected.
      Simple, effective, transparent, cheap.
      Maybe you US citizens need another revolution to simplify your rather complex government* systems? Though I doubt the French would help you win this time...

      * massive understatement!

    359. Re:You can't eliminate them by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's a bit of a complicated way to re-value the currency. Often countries will just divide by 10. Declare a date when everybody re-values and invalidate old currency, except for deposit at the discount rate.

      We could easily survive a 10x reduction now. A soda costs 15 cents, minimum wage is 75 cents, and a good car goes for $2500. Average salary is $4400.

      Maybe when they switch to polymer bills would be a good time.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    360. Re:You can't eliminate them by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The difference is the same as saying "The apples are red" versus "These apples are red". It's subtle, but it's different.

    361. Re:You can't eliminate them by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's because our money system was based upon the Spanish milled dollar, which was divided into eight bits. The quarter is a natural in this system, being 2 bits (this is the origin of the phrase "shave and a haircut, 2 bits"). The dime is really the oddball, as it should have been a 12.5 cent piece, but the founding fathers wanted a decimal money system so they made it into the 10 cent piece, but did nothing about changing the quarter. This is also why, when the US minted coins larger than the dollar, that we had a $2.50 coin but never had a $2 coin.

    362. Re:You can't eliminate them by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins are a basically psuedo-subway/bus token in some cities. They are also accepted by many vending machines. They also circulate in some other countries that use the US dollar, like Ecuador.

      The really useless coin nowadays is the half dollar. It doesn't circulate, vending machines don't take them, and the US mint hasn't bothered minting them for circulation in over a decade now as there is little demand for the coin. With that said, I wouldn't kill them off until waiting to see if they gain popularity once the cent and dollar bill are killed off.

    363. Re:You can't eliminate them by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Good luck trying to find ANYTHING under $0.10.
      Cheap sweets used to come and prices like "8 for $0.10" anyway, to void people asking for six, or 9.

    364. Re:You can't eliminate them by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

      This is very similar to a store that's right on the border of Virginia and North Carolina. On the Virginia side you can get delicious BBQ, but on the North Carolina side, you can select and pay for fireworks which are not legal in most parts of south eastern Virginia.

    365. Re:You can't eliminate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complicating the situation in the U.S. is that the Federal government, on the assumption that people won't report their tips, requires people in certain kinds of jobs (waiters, etc) to pay taxes on what the government considers to be a fair tip for their services, whether or not they actually received said tips!

    366. Re:You can't eliminate them by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      French spelling is easy. Write out the first syllable phonetically, and then put 5-20 additional characters on the end which are silent. Bam. My handle, for example, is pronounced "Ben".

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    367. Re:You can't eliminate them by cffrost · · Score: 1

      (S+V+MP)

      ?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    368. Re:You can't eliminate them by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened in Seattle. We voted against new stadia, yet the Kingdome was blown up anyway, including the roof that wasn't even paid for. Then Paul Allen got us to build him two replacements, one of which is used 9 days a year, and the other is used for pansy-ass American League pseudo-baseball.

    369. Re:You can't eliminate them by thereitis · · Score: 1

      Impose a 7% national sales tax, payable to the federal government. At the same time, prohibit states and localities from collecting their own sales taxes.

      From what I read in a separate discussion, that would give the federal government even more power to strong-arm the states. eg. if you don't do what the fed wants, you don't get your tax money.

  2. rid of pennies by ixidor · · Score: 1

    put out as a referendum, let people vote. get rid of them. then comes the sob stories of old cat ladies who now cannot afford food because the price was rounded up 2 cents.

    1. Re:rid of pennies by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Statistically, if you go shopping and buy more than one thing, it's just as likely to get rounded down than up.

      We ditched the 1c (and 2c) coin in Australia years ago, when I was still a child. But we still have prices like $4.99 and $18.87 etc. Rounding occurs to the nearest 5c, but only the TOTAL of a transaction is rounded.

      So if old cat lady went and bought only one can of 99 cent cat food, then yeah, she'd have to pay a buck. But if she bought three cans, 3x .99 = 2.97, so she'd pay $2.95, saving her an entire 2 cents! In practice, since prices are pretty random, the products you buy and the amount of each you buy aren't really predictable, it evens out the same - sometimes it rounds up, sometimes down.

      Oh and only cash transactions get rounded. If old cat lady paid with a debit/credit card, she'd pay only $0.99 for even the single can.

    2. Re:rid of pennies by geekoid · · Score: 1

      NO. no. and NO.

      Removing a a coin will have global effects on the value of the dollar. It will be seen as devaluing. So, shut up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:rid of pennies by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Sorry, in the US the merchants would always be rounding up. If it was illegal to round up and they had millions of government employees coming around to inspect cash registers and such, the merchants would simply change the prices so that it worked out to the same effect.

      One strong lesson to learn is that you are never going to get businesses to accept a loss of revenue without a huge fight. So it would literally require millions of inspectors to visit every location to check what their point-of-sale system was doing. If it was known there were not such inspectors - and the penalties were severe and immediate - then everyone would simply cheat knowing that if you buy 25 items you aren't going to be in a position to argue about a couple of cents.

      There would also be the "fact" that people paying with debit cards would receive favorable treatment - lower costs. That would elicit marches on government buildings with people holding up signs saying "MARK OF THE BEAST!!!!" Even people that didn't believe would be inspired to join in the protest of unfair treatment of cash payments.

      It would be a mess in the US and it wouldn't work.

    4. Re:rid of pennies by webnut77 · · Score: 1

      We'll be saying the same thing in 20 years about the quarter.

      Instead, why don't we stop printing more money which devalues the penny, nickel, dime, etc. Inflation is the hidden tax that eats, not only into your income, but also into your savings. And, guess what, congress doesn't take the heat for increasing taxes.

      Let's go back to the gold standard.

    5. Re:rid of pennies by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Thing is, it's impossible to manipulate the prices so that it always rounds in a particular way, unless you control exactly how many (and which) items are bought in each transaction. Thus it's not forcing businesses to take a loss of revenue - they'll get up to 2 c MORE in some transactions, and up to 2 c less in others. It evens out the same. People paying with debit cards will sometimes pay more, sometimes less, so again, I don't think they get favorable treatment.

      I cannot for the life of me believe that they've done this in Australia, NZ, most European countries etc. but it would be impossible in the US. Do you think those other countries don't have greedy businesses too? Sure they do, and they are equally protective of their revenues. But, as mentioned, they don't actually take a revenue hit from this. In fact they supported it because it reduced the wasted time handling those useless 1 cent coins. So there isn't a need for an army of inspectors checking POS machines (notwithstanding the fact that you couldn't get away with rounding up incorrectly anyway, since the customer would notice on their receipt!)

      Besides, the worst case scenario is 2 cents. If businesses will really cheat in the way that you say (and I don't see why they would unless they are fundamentally different than businesses in every other country that's done this), then hell, just make the law "businesses can always round up to the next 5 cents". They get their few cents of precious revenue, you don't need inspectors/enforcement, and the rest of us get the benefits of not having pennies. Are there really that many people that are going to get enraged over 'losing' 2 cents (considering you 'lose' orders of magnitude more than that just through inflation each year).

  3. 100 to 1 by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Drop the minimum wage to 8 cents an hour and divide all current cash value by 100.

    Think of it: 1c hamburgers, lunch for a dime and leave a 2c tip, and your average American home for $1000.

    Also, any transaction dealing with a $100 bill or higher will have to be reported....

    1. Re:100 to 1 by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Except how would that work with the rest of the world?

      Prices in the UK would still remain the same as they are now, so they too would have to divide their currency in the same way.

      Otherwise a leather jacket in the US might be $1, but £100 in the UK.

    2. Re:100 to 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3rd world monetary policy is that you? Also what would happen to all the cent's I hold in my bank account right now? I would lose all 98 cents! This is unacceptable. That could have been 98 hamburgers. See, I can still do Math! AMERICA FUCK YEAH!

    3. Re:100 to 1 by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except how would that work with the rest of the world?

      Prices in the UK would still remain the same as they are now, so they too would have to divide their currency in the same way.

      Otherwise a leather jacket in the US might be $1, but £100 in the UK.

      I don't see a problem with that, that same leather jacket is 10,000 yen in Japan.

    4. Re:100 to 1 by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Why would that matter in the slightest? We already have exchange rates.

      Numerous countries have removed done such things in the past - it's a sure sign that hyper-inflation has kicked in and people are getting sick of having to carry several kilograms of paper currency in order to buy lunch.

    5. Re:100 to 1 by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      The *huge* advantage of this, is seeing round numbers all the time, and not numbers for which no-one will have change.

    6. Re:100 to 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, any transaction dealing with a $100 bill or higher will have to be reported....

      An Indian anti corrpution activist had actually suggested this, and more

      Just for reference, 1 lakh=100,000,1crore=100lakh, 1USD=INR 50
      http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/now-ramdev-on-fast-track-against-corruption-103386
      He simply wanted to ban all high denomination notes

    7. Re:100 to 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be easier to just remove all value for coins, (but allow people to trade them in for $1 bills at the bank for a period of time) and then make the $1 bill the new penny? Seem's difficult to just remove everyone's money, the only way I could see to do it would be to introduce completely new currency, and make all the existing currency useless (without trading it in) but that seems way more costly then just removing coins from the equation.

    8. Re:100 to 1 by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      The UK has recently considered such an option which involves making some of the coinage smaller and using steel rather than copper or other materials. This will save the mint around GBP 300 million but cost businesses many times that amount as machines have to be adjusted.

      Now is definitely the time to move to a credit based system which is completely electronic. It served me well when playing Elite in the 80s - those textiles and narcotics don't move themselves you know!

    9. Re:100 to 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except how would that work with the rest of the world?

      Prices in the UK would still remain the same as they are now, so they too would have to divide their currency in the same way.

      Otherwise a leather jacket in the US might be $1, but £100 in the UK.

      I don't see a problem with that, that same leather jacket is 10,000 yen in Japan.

      Well, given the fluctuation of the exchange rate, I think it's probably closer to OVER 9000!

    10. Re:100 to 1 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      On the down side, no one will be able to afford to shop in a dollar store anymore...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:100 to 1 by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Penny store? And, things could still be bundled 6 for a penny...

    12. Re:100 to 1 by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      Yeah do this! My penny jar would get me a car!

  4. what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In most Euro-countries, prices are rounded to the nearest 5-cent number, 1- and 2-cent coins are quite rare. Why even bother producing coins that are worth more as a material than as a coin?

    1. Re:what's wrong with rounding by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Funny

      In most Euro-countries, prices are rounded to the nearest 5-cent number, 1- and 2-cent coins are quite rare. Why even bother producing coins that are worth more as a material than as a coin?

      In most Euro-countries, people don't consider mathematical ability a sign of social awkwardness, as opposed to the U.S....

    2. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Troed · · Score: 1

      I don't even accept change back if it's less than 5 SEK (~0.56€, ~$0.75). Too much hassle to carry around coins.

    3. Re:what's wrong with rounding by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Actually, most Eurozone countries still have prices like €1.79 or €2.98. Only the total amount due gets rounded to the nearest 5 cents. I think most countries have stopped minting the 1 and 2 cent coins, but they remain legal tender.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:what's wrong with rounding by griffjon · · Score: 1

      That brings up another interesting alternative - don't try and get rid of pennies by having banks collect then and not provide them out as change, but simply stop producing them.

      Regardless, making nickles cheaper that 11 cents per to make seems to be ... well, kinda obvious?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    5. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You must not go to the same countries as me, I have a bunch of 1 and 2 euro cent coins that are utterly useless. I'd have to deliver hundreds to get one ice cream. Here in Norway our smallest coin (50 øre) is about 7 euro-cents or 9 US cents and they've considered taking that away too.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:what's wrong with rounding by oh2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, in Sweden the smallest coin is 1 SEK these days, equivalent to about 15 cents. Exactly what can you buy for less than 15 cents ?

      --

      Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

    7. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Ozeroc · · Score: 1

      The Euro has 1c, 2c, 5c, 10c, 20c, 50c, 1euro and 5 euro coins... Paper bills from there on up. The 1c and 2c coins are magnetic and I extract them from my change pile with a neodymium magnet... I work at a military installation and all the USD based commerce (BX/PX/Commisary) is done without pennies.

      --
      ...
    8. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Ozeroc · · Score: 2

      Derp... 2 euro coins and 5 euro bills.

      --
      ...
    9. Re:what's wrong with rounding by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      In the US we have machines that for a small fee (like seven or eight percent of the transaction) will take bucket loads of change, sort it, count it, and give you bills. Most people I know put all their change into a jar or vase or something and take it to the machines every few months or a year. My wife an had a huge jar of change that we'd been saving for a few years that we turned into like $200 or so when we moved last, paid for most of the ancillary expenses. Maybe if you hop across to a Euro based country they have something similar?

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    10. Re:what's wrong with rounding by k.a.f. · · Score: 2

      No, all countries that use the Euro have the same set of coins - including 1, 2, and 5 cent coins. IIRC, only the Netherlands and Finland have abandoned the smallest coins in practice. They mint only token amounts, but they still mint them.

    11. Re:what's wrong with rounding by will_die · · Score: 1

      Have not seen them in any German stores I go to. However I tend to use my change more in the Europe then I did when in the USA so the only change that tends to build up are 1 and 2 cents

    12. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Or leave everything as it is apart from making coins from cheaper material, and save $100 million with very little effort. Expending a lot of political capital for such a small amount is really not worth it. If you have to convince 55% of the population of something they don't want, then pick an important issue like global warming, the war on drugs etc.

    13. Re:what's wrong with rounding by xMrFishx · · Score: 2

      Yeah I think we call them Banks, and they don't take a cut. The Post Office will convert your change too for free. Those machines exist but since there's more Post Offices than auto-sorter machines that steal 10%, I think people go to the Post Office instead.

    14. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      In most Euro-countries, people don't consider mathematical ability a sign of social awkwardness, as opposed to the U.S....

      Unless you ask one to do a unit conversion to/from SI . . .

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    15. Re:what's wrong with rounding by C0R1D4N · · Score: 0

      Bazooka Joe

    16. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Regardless, making nickles cheaper that 11 cents per to make seems to be ... well, kinda obvious?

      A lot of people seem to think that the cost of currency should some how be related to the face value. But it doesn't matter if a Nickel costs more than 5 cents. It's not like they are one-time use items. I imagine a paper dollar wears out A LOT faster than a penny or nickel -- which is why they try to push dollar coins.

    17. Re:what's wrong with rounding by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      Im guessing you havent been to Spain - they are quite common there

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    18. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think we're ready to completely revamp our monetary system. I like the idea of just making them cheaper to produce. Honestly, I've always wondered why the copper anyway.

    19. Re:what's wrong with rounding by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      If a nikel was worth more that 5 cents, then it would quickly become a one use item.

    20. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah ha! there is no shortage of pennies if y'all would just empty that cider jug you've been saving them in for 30 years.

      You're never going to turn up that rare Indian penny and make a few bucks on it anyway!

    21. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, the banks make you put the coins in those paper rolls before they'll take 'em.

      Also Americans will generally trust a machine that takes 10% to not "rip them off" more than a human who says they wouldn't steal anything. Make of that what you will.

    22. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Novogrudok · · Score: 1

      Euro 1c, 2c and 5c are made of copper-covered steel, so a magnet should pick up 5c coins too. http://euromania.altervista.org/composition.htm

    23. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL @ Eurotrash comment. The US has the best university system in the world and houses most of the world's leading tech companies. Japan is a close second...European countries not so much.

    24. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in Sweden the smallest coin is 1 SEK these days, equivalent to about 15 cents. Exactly what can you buy for less than 15 cents ?

      Nothing in Sweden obviously. Seriously though, this sort of thing kills you if you buy a lot of inexpensive things (like groceries). Having prices jacked up by 5-10 cents might not sound like much, but it could add hundreds of dollars in expenses per year. I remember small things being very expensive when I was over there, but maybe everything is just expensive there.

    25. Re:what's wrong with rounding by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how easy it is to reuse the alloys that are used in modern currency, but I know that when shillings used to be made from Sterling Silver, there were people who would melt them down and sell the silver.

    26. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most Euro-countries, people don't consider mathematical ability a sign of social awkwardness

      Pfft. Most Euro-countries don't even speak English as their native language. Savages.

    27. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      I'd question your use of "most", since out of the Eurozone countries I've visited precisely zero do that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:what's wrong with rounding by elvis15 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the US could use all the money it saves by dropping the penny from circulation to help fund education in math and sciences (and by that I mean actual math and science, not stuff like creationism).

    29. Re:what's wrong with rounding by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the US could use all the money it saves by dropping the penny from circulation to help fund education in math and sciences (and by that I mean actual math and science, not stuff like creationism).

      Funding isn't the fundamental problem with U.S. education, although Fundamentalism is a big one....

    30. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Why even bother producing coins that are worth more as a material than as a coin?

      We would like to keep down the cost of producing coins, certainly. But it's a bit of a fallacy to say that the coin cannot be composed of materials & processes which cost more than its face value to be manufactured. The coin will quite possibly be in circulation for decades, and it will certainly do more than [face value] cents of "work".

      On the other hand, we certainly do want to do our part to remove incentives of criminals to destroy currency in order to recycle & sell the raw materials from which they were made (picture zinc ingots).

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    31. Re:what's wrong with rounding by lyml · · Score: 1

      Unless you habitually buy groceries for less than 16 cents the price is just as likely to be rounded up as down. So no, it doesn't add up to hundreds of dollars.

      I'm pretty sure cost of living in Sweden is higher than in some parts of the states but I doubt it is that much higher.

    32. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Nothing... but that's because you don't have a coin for it.

    33. Re:what's wrong with rounding by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Europeans evidently don't have enough rappers. Everyone knows that good grades or the ability to add means you are a nerd. Want to be popular? A C average is a good starting point.

    34. Re:what's wrong with rounding by niado · · Score: 1

      Our (US) banks will also do that, though they generally require that you roll change (organize it into specifically denominated paper packets) if you attempt to exchange a significant quantity. The machines in question are charging a convenience fee so you can avoid the somewhat tedious rolling.

    35. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      From what I remember from my more active coin collecting days the average lifespan of a $1 bill was about 18 months where as most coins have a lifespan of about 20 years.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    36. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well that is happening in mass to the old US silver dimes, quarters, half dollars, and dollars. It is even legal to do now. There is some push for the same with pennies as the some of the 1982 and all earlier ones are worth more than $0.01 face value in melt value. Currently only the old silver coins are legal to melt so you can't do it to modern coins or any pennies or nickles.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    37. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 penny sweets?

    38. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you ever round down? "Let's see, I have this hot-selling item that I used to sell for 65 cents, I guess I'll have to cut the price to 60 cents now and hope it evens out on average." We're not talking about automated register pricing, we're talking about human beings in the loop setting pricing. Nobody in their right mind is going to cut prices in that situation unless there's a competitive advantage. Limiting the number of discrete steps in your pricing guarantees that prices will go up because it reduces the seller's ability to set their margin to the same precision. I don't have my receipts in front of me, but I remember that prices on little things like snacks were much more expensive than their US counterparts if you took the time to do the conversion. Solution: don't do the conversion.

    39. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      When the melt value of pennies and nickels got close to the current point the govt passed legislation outlawing melting of pennies and nickels and exporting large amounts to be melted elsewhere is also a no-no.

    40. Re:what's wrong with rounding by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, a lot of shops have charity boxes by the till for putting this kind of change into. Apparently they are quite lucrative.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    41. Re:what's wrong with rounding by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the legality of it? There are enough scrap metal merchants around who knowingly accept stolen copper, I'm sure you wouldn't have to look too hard to find one who also accepts coins.

    42. Re:what's wrong with rounding by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      In the US, the banks make you put the coins in those paper rolls before they'll take 'em.

      Huh, interesting. My local credit union has one of those machines in the lobby, but they provide it as a service to customers -- customers don't have to roll their coins before entering, and the bank doesn't take a percentage for the convenience of using the machine.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    43. Re:what's wrong with rounding by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A lot of people seem to think that the cost of currency should some how be related to the face value. But it doesn't matter if a Nickel costs more than 5 cents.

      It does matter if you want it to keep circulating, rather than getting melted down and sold for scrap. It does not matter only in a sense that cost doesn't need to be the same as face value, but even for fiat money it should never be higher.

    44. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "Let's see, I have this hot-selling item that I used to sell for 65 cents, I guess I'll have to cut the price to 60 cents now and hope it evens out on average."

      If the market would bear 70, they'd be charging that already.

      Nobody in their right mind is going to cut prices in that situation unless there's a competitive advantage.

      I would define people shopping at your store rather than going to your competitor as an advantage.

      Limiting the number of discrete steps in your pricing guarantees that prices will go up because it reduces the seller's ability to set their margin to the same precision.

      There's a tendency, no doubt for psychological reasons, to price just under a round amount. By my reckoning, 9.90 and 9.95 are both less than 9.99.

      I remember that prices on little things like snacks were much more expensive than their US counterparts if you took the time to do the conversion.

      Is the difference within a step, i.e. one of the smallest coin? I suspect it's rather more, in which case it can't be due to rounding. Sweden is expensive, everybody knows that.

      You seem to have fallen for post hoc ergo propter hoc, to say nothing of drawing a universal conclusion from a sample of 1.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    45. Re:what's wrong with rounding by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I think it's just the Netherlands and Finland that don't make 1 and 2 cent coins.

    46. Re:what's wrong with rounding by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      An interesting argument against the abolishment of 1p and 2p coins in the UK was that it would harm charities. Most shops in the UK will have a charity collection pot next to the till. If you're given copper change (1p or 2p coins), many people will just drop it straight into the charity pot to save having it rattling around their wallets. If all change given out was "real money" (denominations large enough people care about it), people would be unlikely to idly drop it in the charity pot.

  5. Fatal flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it costs 2 pennies to make 1 penny then you have destroyed a penny by making a penny.

    1. Re:Fatal flaw by citab · · Score: 1

      was thinking the same the ... what a waste ... plus by making a nickle for 11.2 cents ... you've destroyed a penny AND a nickle!!

      Makes you wonder what the production cost is for all the other coins and paper denominations. Maybe we need to rethink all of them.

    2. Re:Fatal flaw by geekoid · · Score: 2

      That is classic financial ignorance.

      The cost to create a coin is a one time cost for that coin, but that coin is used many times.

      So a Penny cost 2 cents to make, but it's a penny at every transaction. If A penny was used only once, then you would have a point.

      Interesting note, at any other time, the penny has no value. It's only at the moment of exchange.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Fatal flaw by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the *real * argument is that bitz-n-shits coinage like the one cent piece are A FRAUD PERPETRATED AGAINST THE COMMON MAN.
      It is *massively* inconvenient for mere-mortals to carry around such fractional coinage for the purposes of actual monetary transactions.

      So this *money* gets lost, spilled or simply hoarded where it neither executes transactions nor earns interest - thereby *directly* providing *literally* negative value to The Common Man.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  6. Get rid of coins altogether by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

    Replace coinage with paper currency if you have to, but eliminate all the annoying pocket change.

    --
    And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    1. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Cornwallis · · Score: 1

      The "annoying pocket change" is the only real currency we still have. You'd be better off scarfing up nickels - as many as you can - while they are still composed of nickel. Think pre-1964 silver dimes/quarters for comparison.

    2. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by pegasustonans · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "annoying pocket change" is the only real currency we still have. You'd be better off scarfing up nickels - as many as you can - while they are still composed of nickel. Think pre-1964 silver dimes/quarters for comparison.

      I'd rather just buy sheets of nickel or other metals with my debit card if I feel the need for it, which I don't.

      I'm not much of a coin/metal collector.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    3. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When my grandfather was young (early 1930's), a typical worker earned $2/day. That worker today earns $160-200/day. So in 1930, any transaction that was less than half a days pay was done in change, and the smallest unit was 1/200th of a days pay. Today that would be like having a smallest paper currency of $80-100 and a smallest coinage of 80cents or $1. Having coins that represent 1/20,000th of a days pay is ridiculous.

    4. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I do this with pre-1982 pennies. I have many rolls of them now, I drop all the pennies I get in change into a jar and every once in a while sort them, roll up the copper ones, and bring the zinc ones to the bank to get counted and deposited. It's not like it's a retirement fund or anything, but it takes just a few minutes every few weeks and my kids help me which is fun, so I figure why not?

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by sootman · · Score: 2

      I was surprised to learn a few weeks ago that while you can still melt down silver coins, it is no longer legal to melt pennies or nickels as of 2006. Not only is the copper in a (pre-82) penny worth more than $0.01, zinc has gone up as well.

      For those who don't know: Before 1982, pennies were 95% copper, 5% zinc. In 1982 they switched to 97% zinc, 3% copper. Some 1982 pennies are mostly copper, some are mostly zinc. Silver coins (the U.S. quit making them in 1964) are quite rare but old pennies are still very common. The last time I rolled a hundred pennies, I wasn't even looking at the years, but I found 8 wheat pennies (pre-1958) just because they're easy to spot.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it's now illegal to melt them down.

      Interesting fact: you can tell the difference between a mostly-Cu penny and a mostly-Zn penny by sound. Dropping a Cu penny on a hard surface results in a high-pitched 'ting' - the Zn penny makes more of a 'thunk' sound.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by trout007 · · Score: 2

      Pocket change is only annoying if it's worthless metal. With real metal coins you could buy a weeks worth of groceries with a gold coin the size of a dime.

      If we still had real metal coins this is what their value would be today.

      Copper Penny 2.5 cents
      Silver/Copper Nickel $1.88
      Silver Dime $2.42
      Silver Quarter $6.05
      Silver Half Dollar $12.10
      Silver Dollar $25.90
      $1 Gold Coin $83.74
      $2.50 Gold Coin $209
      $5 Gold Coin $418
      $10 Gold Coin $836
      $20 Gold Coin $1675

      From http://www.coinflation.com/

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    8. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it's now illegal to melt them down.

      That's true, but even in coin form pre-1964 silver half-dollars, quarters, and dimes trade at just about the going price of the metal they contain. As the value of the dollar continues to fall, there's no reason people would treat copper coins differently.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    9. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by pegasustonans · · Score: 1

      Pocket change is only annoying if it's worthless metal. With real metal coins you could buy a weeks worth of groceries with a gold coin the size of a dime.

      Metal is only worth what you have the skills to make with it. Any other worth is tacked on by social convention.

      --
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
    10. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      The "annoying pocket change" is the only real currency we still have. You'd be better off scarfing up nickels - as many as you can - while they are still composed of nickel. Think pre-1964 silver dimes/quarters for comparison.

      You should probably use those nickles to buy food instead of eating them.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just buy sheets of nickel or other metals with my debit card if I feel the need for it, which I don't.

      You missed the point. The bullion value of a nickel is slightly higher than its face value. Thus, if you invest in copper and nickel by hoarding nickel coins, the government is essentially selling you the metals at below their market value. (Despite the name, a nickel is 75% copper, and has been since 1866 when they were first minted.)

    12. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0

      When my grandfather was young (early 1930's), a typical worker earned $2/day. That worker today earns $160-200/day.

      Note that most of that increase is due to an increase in the money supply relative to the goods available to be purchased - in other words, inflation.

      Just remember, if you can't balance your budget, inflation is your friend (it'll make it possible to pay back your debts with increasingly worthless dollars/euros/whatever).

      On the other hand, if you live within your means, inflation is your enemy....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by trout007 · · Score: 1

      You have a serious misunderstand of economics. All things are only worth what people value them to be. Everyone has their own value scale in which they rank choices. Skills and effort don't have anything to do with worth. All skill and effort do is help people decide what course of action to take. I may value a trip to the moon at $10,000. But if nobody can figure out how to do it for that amount of money it won't get done. Or I may accept $1000 to dig a 4ft x 6ft x 6 ft deep hole and fill it back in. But nobody will find it valuable to pay me to do it so it won't get done. It is only when someones value to do something and someones value to pay for something meet does anything get done. If I think a hamburger is worth $2 and McDonalds is willing to sell me one at that price does anything happen.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    14. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Just more government nonsense. Government does not own the money, it's yours to do with as you please.

      Of-course the real money cannot be issued by the government anyway, Constitutionally only gold and silver is money, you bring your bullion to the mint and they make a coin for you out of it so that it's recognised, that's the only purpose of the mint.

    15. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by geekoid · · Score: 1

      except you can't get it's nickle cost because you would ALSO have to pay for the process of removing the non nickle.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by rangek · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it's now illegal to melt them down.

      The link says that is an "interim rule, to be effective for a period of 120 days from the time of publication", which was December 14, 2006. So it seems that this rule is no longer in effect.

    17. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      If you read the whole comment, it says:

      "The regulations are being issued in the form of an interim rule, to be effective for a period of 120 days from the time of publication. The interim rule states that during a 30-day period from the date of publication, the public can submit written comments to the United States Mint on the regulations. Upon consideration of such comments, the Director of the United States Mint would then issue the final rule. "

      The interim part is with regard to soliciting comments, not the final duration of the law. Note that it says the Director of the Mint will issue a final ruling - he did, and it was published in the Federal Register and it's in effect until repealed.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    18. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hasn't he allowed for inflation (at least approximately) by expressing it as a percentage of daily wages?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Most of those old silver coins are just melted now as it is legal and the only ones that aren't are ones that are good examples that carry a premium. If you wanted to scarf up some plentiful "modern" coins I suggest doing it with pre 1982 pennies. Granted nickles have had the same composition for a while so you wouldn't need to sort them but the per coin gain is probably higher on the pennies.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    20. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Most of those old coins are in a well circulated condition so there isn't any collector value. Most coin shops are more than willing to buy the scrap/junk silver coins and pay by weight, usually slightly below spot (the place I sold my silver bullion bought at %4 below spot). Never offload precious metals to a pawn shop as they typically buy at 50% below spot price, although they sell at just over spot so if you can find a nice condition or collectable year coin buy it and take it to a real coin shop.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    21. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      So I am not the only one who mines their change. I don't bother to roll the pennies I just toss them in a 5 gallon bucket.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    22. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, melting them down is illegal in the USA, as is exporting them in anything other than very small quantities, so melting them down in another country is difficult too...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    23. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      How would you prove that whatever I have melted down was nickels before it melted?

    24. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by MacDork · · Score: 1

      When my grandfather was young (early 1930's), a typical worker earned $2/day. That worker today earns $160-200/day.

      Obama wants cheaper pennies? Tell him to stop redistributing wealth to Wall Street with bailouts that cause such massive inflation.

    25. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are impurities that would show up. No doubt there are ways to remove them, but that's effort and more effort pushes it towards not being worth bothering.

      And anyway, isn't it down to you to prove they weren't? Do you want the tairsts and pediophiddlers and commernusts to win and take away our freedoms?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Government does not own the money, it's yours to do with as you please.

      So how come they can stick you in jail for damaging it? Title 18 sec 333.

      Constitutionally only gold and silver is money

      [citation needed]

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    27. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      So how come they can stick you in jail for damaging it? Title 18 sec 333.

      - because the population has long ago stopped holding the government accountable with respect to the Constitution, ever since they stopped bothering with amendments as an example, to take away your rights. They just do it and nobody challenges and stops them.

      As to only gold and silver being money, you need to understand something:

      AMENDMENT IX
              RIGHTS RETAINED BY THE PEOPLE
              The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

              AMENDMENT X
              POWERS RETAINED BY THE STATES AND THE PEOPLE
              The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

      and this

      Article I, Section 8, Clause 5: The Congress shall have Powerâ¦To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.

      To COIN means to make coins out of gold and silver. You bring your metal to the mint and they can coin it for you (maybe they take a fee for it, but that's the purpose of the mint, to coin money out of bullion). "Regulating value" means defining what a dollar is in terms of WEIGHT of gold/silver and purity of gold/silver.

      Coinage Act of 1792 - this was the coinage act that defined weights and measures for what a dollar was in gold and silver.

      "No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

      Federal reserve activities are not authorised by the Constitution, what the Fed does is illegal.

    28. Re:Get rid of coins altogether by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You can also start sorting out the pre-1982 pennies (and the copper 1982 pennies if you wanted to sort those from the zinc 1982 ones) from your change as they are basically pure copper and are worth more than face value too. Each one is worth about 2.5 cents and I still get them in my change on a somewhat regular basis.

  7. The problem with actual value of theoretical money by windcask · · Score: 2

    Our money does not represent actual holdings of the treasury, rather a veritable mortgage on the holdings of the treasury. Why shouldn't our smaller units of currency be converted to paper to reflect this situation and keep costs down, rather than attempting to approximate the actual value of the materials used to produce the currency as we did during the era of the gold standard?

  8. Monetary insanity by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other great civilizations have done this and it always leads to ruin. The more you debase your currency, the less valuable the actual coins and other forms of currency become, the worse the devaluation gets. The only sane thing here to do is begin discussing plans to fundamentally bolster the foundation of the US dollar, not find ways to make producing it cheaper.

    It's not like they're doing the common man any favors. Inflation hits the poor first and hits them hardest. It's a backdoor flat tax.

    1. Re:Monetary insanity by VMaN · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's only a valid point if the currency isn't a fiat currency.

      A cent isn't worth a cent because of the copper content...

    2. Re:Monetary insanity by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      What? In most of those societies, the value of the money was based on its metal content. That's not true of modern money in even the wildest fantasy.

    3. Re:Monetary insanity by Troyusrex · · Score: 1

      Other great civilizations have done this and it always leads to ruin.

      A thousand years from now the text books (or ebooks or brain implants or whatever they have then) will all point to 2012 and the changing of the metal content of pennies as root cause of the fall of the USA. Having learned their lesson they'll have golden pennies with a bullion value of $5 and a nominal value of $.01. Utopia will be achieved.

    4. Re:Monetary insanity by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Idiot. What do you think a $5 bill is worth?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    5. Re:Monetary insanity by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Other great civilizations have done this and it always leads to ruin. The more you debase your currency, the less valuable the actual coins and other forms of currency become, the worse the devaluation gets. The only sane thing here to do is begin discussing plans to fundamentally bolster the foundation of the US dollar, not find ways to make producing it cheaper.

      It's not like they're doing the common man any favors. Inflation hits the poor first and hits them hardest. It's a backdoor flat tax.

      This does not follow. Making a penny -- a token of one cent -- more cheaply has nothing to do with debasing the currency. The US is not on a "zinc standard".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    6. Re:Monetary insanity by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you think a $5 bill is worth?

      About 12.44 BTU theoretical, 4 BTU recoverable.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:Monetary insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. What do you think a $5 bill is worth?

      Well, it depends. I can either buy 500 pennies with it, or I can make 208 pennies with it.

    8. Re:Monetary insanity by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

      Other great civilizations have done this and it always leads to ruin.

      [citation needed]

    9. Re:Monetary insanity by couchslug · · Score: 2

      The public are stupid, stupid beasts (observe who they elect) and want to hold their fiat illusion.

      Challenge that and they will hurt you.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Monetary insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can thank Richard Nixon for this, as he took us off the gold standard. This was one of the things that has allowed the Dollar to inflate som much since his time.

    11. Re:Monetary insanity by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Not pennies. Silver. Silver was removed from the currency in 1965. Before that, your quarters and dimes were silver pieces, 90%. Now, all they are is base metal.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    12. Re:Monetary insanity by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are talking about two different issues.

      Bolstering the US economy is different then make money cheaper to make.

      Why is lowering the cost to make a penny a flat tax?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Monetary insanity by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "the value of the money was based on its metal content."

      actually.. no.
      And when it was, the value of the metal was determined by the government.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Monetary insanity by geekoid · · Score: 1

      See: Atlantis, Shangri-La, Johto, and Macho Grande.

      Damn straight that's an Airplane! and Pokemon reference in one post, bitches!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Monetary insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. I'll bet that the value of copper hasn't gone up as much as the cost in USD would indicate, but rather that the value of USD has gone down due to inflation. So even though we have fiat money, this ratio is still relevant.

    16. Re:Monetary insanity by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      We should just switch now to quatloos, administered by glowing brains.

    17. Re:Monetary insanity by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The only sane thing here to do is begin discussing plans to fundamentally bolster the foundation of the US dollar, not find ways to make producing it cheaper.

      The cost of producing the physical token has zero relation to the monetary value or purchasing power of said token.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Monetary insanity by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'll bet that the value of copper hasn't gone up as much as the cost in USD would indicate, but rather that the value of USD has gone down due to inflation.

      The recent epidemic of copper theft in the UK seems to indicate that you would lose such a bet.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Monetary insanity by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Inflation hits the poor first and hits them hardest. It's a backdoor flat tax.

      It works out pretty good for folks with lots of fixed-interest-rate debt. I guess they aren't the poor, though...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:Monetary insanity by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Oh, "fiat". I thought you said "flat" and I was wondering what currency out there wasn't flat...

    21. Re:Monetary insanity by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It works out pretty good for folks with lots of fixed-interest-rate debt.

      Only if their earnings keep pace with the inflation.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Get rid of them by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Australia got rid of 1 and 2c pieces years ago and that didn't kill us at all.

    That doesn't mean you people don't advertise things at 99 cents, just that you total up the bill and then round to the nearest 5 cents. Sometimes you win (all of 2 cents on a single bill) and sometimes you lose (again, all of 2 cents on a single bill).

    We also ditched $1 and $2 paper currency for $1 and $2 coins. That was also a good move in getting rid of those ratty dollar bills. The US cold easily do the same thing as you already have $1 coins in circulation. About the only people who will notice a change are the strippers who will now have use their coin slots.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Get rid of them by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      Replying to my own post.

      I forgot to say that the US informally has the mindset to ditch pennies. All those trays of pennies next to the cash registers in shops that allow you to "place a penny/take a penny" are grass roots effort to implement rounding of bills to the closest number.

      You don't need to sell the public on this idea, they already do it!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Get rid of them by SirGarlon · · Score: 2

      America has also got rid of pennies insofar as they are not accepted by coin-operated machines such as vending machines and parking meters. This has been true as far as I can remember (into the 1970s). It makes pennies especially useless. Dollar coins have never caught on for the same reason.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:Get rid of them by commlinx · · Score: 1

      All true apart from a minor knitpick, which way a company rounds is their decision AFAIK. Many go nearest, but a lot of larger chains especially selling higher priced items always round down for the sake of never getting a customer complaining they 'lost' two cents. Alternatively I believe always rounding up is also perfectly legal, but obviously not often used from a customer satisfaction point of view.

      When it first came in a friend whose partner worked at a supermarket told me there was a family that would pass through the checkout 20+ times between them to get that few cents rounding benefit.I assume that's fairly rare, but who knows.

    4. Re:Get rid of them by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We also ditched $1 and $2 paper currency for $1 and $2 coins. That was also a good move in getting rid of those ratty dollar bills. The US cold easily do the same thing as you already have $1 coins in circulation. About the only people who will notice a change are the strippers who will now have use their coin slots.

      The dollar coin in the U.S. has been a red headed bastard stepchild of the currency, rarely used and considered stranger than a $2 bill.

      I think we should put out $2, $5 and even $10 coinage, but most of the U.S. seems to be moving to a plastic-credit based currency, with all the attendant privacy and fraud issues, as well as being managed by the private sector instead of the government. Is that a good thing, or a bad thing? I'd say: yes.

    5. Re:Get rid of them by Mr.123 · · Score: 1

      We also ditched $1 and $2 paper currency for $1 and $2 coins. That was also a good move in getting rid of those ratty dollar bills. The US cold easily do the same thing as you already have $1 coins in circulation. About the only people who will notice a change are the strippers who will now have use their coin slots.

      Wait what? How am I suppose to tip strippers without $1 bills!?!

    6. Re:Get rid of them by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      America has also got rid of pennies insofar as they are not accepted by coin-operated machines such as vending machines and parking meters.

      I've seen a few vending machines that take $1 coins in the US. First in Chicago years ago and then in SC last year. The use of $1 coins is spotty for some unknown reason, and I'd say that $2 notes are even less used. About the only place I have seen them is when you buy a ticket to get into Monitcello in Charlottesville, VA - only because it was Jefferson's estate and that his face is on the bill.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    7. Re:Get rid of them by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Polymer notes might be an even easier than coins. But of course Australia is ahead of the USA there too! If we had polymer notes in the 1980s then the $1 and $2 coins would never have existed.

      There's even talk of removing the 5c coin, which would make life a bit easier.

      Still complaining about the $x.99 things? Petrol is still advertised to the tenth of a cent despite being over $1/litre for a decade. I filled up the other day at 141.9c/L. I sister worked at one and she said they had to make the sign bigger for the fourth digit. Why didn't they just drop the .9?

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    8. Re:Get rid of them by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      We also ditched $1 and $2 paper currency for $1 and $2 coins. That was also a good move in getting rid of those ratty dollar bills. The US cold easily do the same thing as you already have $1 coins in circulation. About the only people who will notice a change are the strippers who will now have use their coin slots.

      Wait what? How am I suppose to tip strippers without $1 bills!?!

      Coin slots. It's all written in the GP's comment.

    9. Re:Get rid of them by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      $1 US bills annoy the heck out of me whenever I visit. I remember taking a bus in Vegas in 2006, it averaged 10 seconds to board each person because the fare machine would suck in each $1 bill individually, roll it back out, then suck it in a second time--I assume for verifying secondary characteristics. I think the fare was $2, at 3 seconds per bill, add in time for bills rejected because people put them in wrong. It was beyond retarded--we're not talking $20 or even $5 bills, I'd understand verifying those more carefully.

      We've had $1 and $2 coins in Canada for awhile now, they just make sense.

    10. Re:Get rid of them by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      If you know anyone who is superstitious, give them a two dollar bill and watch them squirm. The types of folks who throw salt over their shoulder feel compelled to get rid of a two dollar bill as soon as they get it. I don't know why, but in terms of bad luck, two dollar bill is like a black cat crossing your path.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    11. Re:Get rid of them by forand · · Score: 1

      While agree with you that pennies are useless, I must disagree with your opinion on paper 1 dollar bills. According to Planet Money, a great NPR podcast, the cost of a dollar bill vs a dollar coin are not a cut and dry as you make it out to be. I cannot find the reference to which podcast it was on but they interviewed someone at the mint who said that the lifetime cost of a coin dollar vs. a bill was about equal with improvements to paper quality and price. The main reason I don't want dollar coins, or many coins at all, is that they are cumbersome to deal with.

    12. Re:Get rid of them by fnj · · Score: 1

      You're right that $1 and $2, very possibly even $5 and $10, should be coins only, and the way to make this happen is absurdly simple. Just stop printing the goddam bills. Anybody who wants to possess change in those denominations will just have to settle for coins; like it or lump it. The bills will wear out quite quickly, and go into the furnaces just as they do now, only they will never be replaced by more.

      Obsoleting 1, 5, and 10 cent coins, maybe even 25 cent coins, could be handled the same way. Just stop minting them and force all retail sales to be rounded after taxes to the nearest $0.25 or $1 by force of law. As the useless small coins get taken in change by stores and delivered to banks, they would gradually go out of circulation. On day one, nobody would be getting them any more in change.

      Use of credit and debit cards is a complete red herring. It's happening. Already I think of anybody in the checkout line using cash or (shudder) check as a complete loser. I happen to think these dopes should be forced to use their own, much slower line. But this issue does not affect the above measures at all.

    13. Re:Get rid of them by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      Use of credit and debit cards is a complete red herring. It's happening. Already I think of anybody in the checkout line using cash or (shudder) check as a complete loser. I happen to think these dopes should be forced to use their own, much slower line. But this issue does not affect the above measures at all.

      Lately I've been encountering more and more "counter culture" cash users - including people who make and accept payment through the mail with cash only, and not just the Kefir Lady and local Farmer's market.

      Not saying that cash or credit are either inherently good or bad, Vive la difference... I do hope we can continue to choose.

    14. Re:Get rid of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pennies are still accepted in US postal stamp vending machines

    15. Re:Get rid of them by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      I loved it when they first brought rounding in, my mother would always make sure that her total ended in a 2 or a 7 to save the 2 cents. Often to achieve that she'd buy me a chocolate bar or similar (provided it was the right price.)

    16. Re:Get rid of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ditched a penny once my world nearly did end. She shot at me with a 38!

    17. Re:Get rid of them by gorzek · · Score: 1

      In the US, rules for rounding would have to be set at least at a state level, if not a federal level. Americans will scream bloody murder if there's inconsistency between how it's done when they go from one establishment to the next.

    18. Re:Get rid of them by gorzek · · Score: 1

      The problem here is inertia. Americans seem to despise the $1 coins and don't want to give up $1 notes at all. Plus, vending machines (which are ubiquitous) almost always take dollar bills but I've never seen one (outside a post office stamp machine) that uses the dollar coins!

    19. Re:Get rid of them by cycleflight · · Score: 1

      $1 only in coins? Go to strip club. Make it hail.

      --
      "...And who wants to make buttprints in the sands of time?" ~Bob Moawad
    20. Re:Get rid of them by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      My currency plan:

      Coins: The dime and the dollar.

      Bills: The ten and hundred.

      Take the current coins, and round them up to the next highest coin, and people won't complain too much. That is, pennies, nickels and dimes are all worth 10 cents, and quarters, half dollars and dollars are worth a dollar. Mint only makes new dimes and dollars as the old coins are automatically removed from circulation.

    21. Re:Get rid of them by geekoid · · Score: 2

      No.

      I leave a penny, because as a kid I was always short a penny. I mean, 6.25% can be hard to calculate when you are 10 and trying to buy as much candy as you can possible buy.
      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Get rid of them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Every vending machine I have used in the last 5 years takes dollar coins.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:Get rid of them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And since 7 is lucky, I will gladly take their 2 dollars of evil, and give the 7 pennies of goodness.

      I know, I'm a saint for taking on all the evil.

      Also, I will gladly pay you 10K cash now for your house so you can use that money that Jesus is coming to kill us all. All you have to do is not be in the house after the date you say he is coming back.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Get rid of them by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, have four coin in your pocket is cumbersome.
      Will, if we went to 5 and 1s the most you should have is 9 coins.

      Welcome to the 21st century, where a few coins is 'cumbersome.

      You might want to go to the gym if a few coins is pushing you over you encumbrance limit.

      haha I'm kidding, but cumbersome? really?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:Get rid of them by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Because 141.9 is smaller than 142, and our primitive brains will often pick the smaller one, despite knowing that we're saving at most a cent or two on our entire gas purchase.

    26. Re:Get rid of them by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      We have had $1 coins in the U.S. since 1971. Almost no one uses them. Of course, it did not help that when they decided to fix the problem of the $1 coin being too heavy and large, they made it similar in size and heft to a quarter.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    27. Re:Get rid of them by AndOne · · Score: 1

      Huh,

      I've carried a 2 dollar bill in the back of my wallet for years as a good luck charm.

      Maybe I'm siphoning the luck away from these other people.

      --
      I don't care what you say, all I need is my Wumpabet soup.
    28. Re:Get rid of them by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Most interstate commerce requires plastic now, mainly because it's costly and unreliable to pay by cold hard cash online or through the mail.s

      But a lot of local places still work in cash only. Plastic takes 3% off the top, and not every business can afford that, or would want to.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    29. Re:Get rid of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can keep 5 $1s in my wallet easily and for as long as I'd need to leave them there until I wanted to make a cheap purchase somewhere, or wanted to use a vending machine, or somesuch.

      $1 coins?

      I don't carry coins, they are inconvenient.

      Paper money. Much easier to carry. $1 is still a valid amount of money to carry

    30. Re:Get rid of them by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      I am not sure I want those coins. Heard from several Navy guys about the Thai Change Machines.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    31. Re:Get rid of them by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I know, we got the $1 coins as change at a transit station in Boston. Problem is when they introduced the coins, the US didn't *withdraw* $1 bills from circulation like Canada and other countries did.

      It's like the Apple vs PC approach: legacy support is nice, but if you don't pull the plug no one will change their habits, even if the change is for the better.

    32. Re:Get rid of them by quenda · · Score: 1

      Why didn't they just drop the .9?

      Or attach a permanent stick-on .9 at the end of the sign.

    33. Re:Get rid of them by tylernt · · Score: 1

      You're right that $1 and $2, very possibly even $5 and $10, should be coins only

      That's a terrible idea. Coins are heavy and bulky. I can keep several one dollar bills in a back pocket and never know they're there until I need them (for feeding vending machines).

      Keeping 5 big heavy coins in a pocket is a (literal) pain in the butt.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    34. Re:Get rid of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such a 'change' could cause a crisis in pockets.

    35. Re:Get rid of them by fnj · · Score: 1

      You'd be out of luck in Europe, genius. They only make 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 euro notes. One and 2 euro are coins only. I happen to think the break point should and will move one notch higher (5 euros) in the near term and further in the long term.

      Paper notes are filthy, disgusting, and wear out quickly. Coins are almost eternal.

      I can't help it, but I have a mental picture of a tottering stick figure who finds carrying a few coins just too taxing. The one euro coin is 7.5 grams, and the 2 euro is 8.5. A half dozen 1 euro and a half dozen 2 euro coins, all together, weigh precisely 96 g, or an entire staggering 3.4 oz, and give you a whole 18 euros in small change. Add a little more for the chicken feed coins below 1 euro, or just don't carry them.

    36. Re:Get rid of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another distinct advantage of euro coin is it can be retrieved
        with a magnet.

  10. Get rid of pennies, nickels and quarters by SJHillman · · Score: 1

    Get rid of pennies and nickels, and replace quarters with half dollar coins. All prices would then have one decimal place instead of two. There would be a lot less useless change floating around; many people discard anything smaller than a dime (or sometimes a quarter) anyway.

    This would also make coin-based 3rd grade arithmetic problems much easier.

    1. Re:Get rid of pennies, nickels and quarters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think through all of the human nature issues, tax issues, the rounding issue, and all of the corner cases, dropping the hundredths and eliminating the penny, nickle and quarter makes tremendous sense. We would probably have 10, 20 and 50 cent coins (1, 2 and 5 disme?). All of the difficulty comes from accounting for hundredths in units of five hundredths .

    2. Re:Get rid of pennies, nickels and quarters by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      With 10, 20 (or 30) and 50 cent coins, you would never receive more than 3 coins in change for any transaction (assuming all full dollar amounts are given in paper money). In addition to saving costs by reducing the different types of coins produced, we also would not need as many coins in total. Other than the cost of initial changeover, it seems like it would save a lot of money in the long run.

    3. Re:Get rid of pennies, nickels and quarters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA!! The solution to the penny problem and the lack of education in america! Make em think less!

  11. In Denmark by VMaN · · Score: 4, Informative

    .. we got rid of the 25 øre in 2008. So now the lowest denomination is 50 øre (around 9 cents). Swedens lowest coin is 1 krone (around 15 cents).

    We've been rounding since 1972, and it omes very natural.

    1. Re:In Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We've been rounding since 1972, and it omes very natural.

      I se wat u di ther.

    2. Re:In Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>and it omes very natural

      I think you rounded off a 'c' there.

    3. Re:In Denmark by saveferrousoxide · · Score: 1

      We've been rounding since 1972, and it omes very natural.

      That's it? We've been rounding here in the States for hundreds of years!

    4. Re:In Denmark by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Norway is dropping the 50 øre this year, and i think the 25 øre went out of circulation in the 80s or 90s.

      I think there was some musing about turning the 50 kr bill into a coin as well, because they get worn out so quickly. Never mind that we already have a 20 kr coin that makes it surprisingly easy to have several 100 kr rattling around.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  12. "found" money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, this could be a boon to sellers at brick-and-mortar sites. How? Because they could report the sale in terms of pennies to tax authorities, yet round up to the nearest nickel when asking for payment. And if the nickel was also eliminated, then it would be to a dime. As has been proven in the past on a number of occasions, if you take a few pennies here, and a few there, if this happens enough times, it adds up to real $$.

  13. We did it in Holland by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Dutch Guilder (Gulden) had its cent removed years ago and when the Euro was introduced it wasn't long before it was agreed the Euro cent would no longer be used either. The latter is a bit more of a hassle since other countries haven't joined but in Holland it works pretty well.

    Prices are till in cents but the deal is that if you pay in cash, it is rounded off. On the whole it balances out although if you are REALLY cheap, you pay eletronically when the rounding is in the shops favor and cash when it is in your favor. Items that you tend to buy on their own are already at a 5 center round off. So a cola would cost 95 instead of 99 cents.

    It just makes sense, inflation makes prices go up but currency stays the same. So why keep amounts around that just don't make sense anymore? When the euro cent was briefly used everyone here quickly saw how fucking annoying they were, you soon ended up with a huge pile of worthless coins. You have to go pretty far back in time to remember being able to buy anything for a cent. I can barely remember being able to buy a single piece of gum for a nickle. Yes, that meant if you saved up 5 cents you had a piece of gum... but those days are gone. Move on.

    It will be intresting to read the reactions on this subject from Americans. Americans are after all paying for these expensive pennies with their taxes and if there is anything an American hates it is paying taxes. So, what excuses will those people come up with to keep cent/penny around? Nostalgia?

    In a way this shows the failure of democracy. This kind of move should be left to wise men, not people who feel nostalgic for a by gone era when you got a shiny penny from your granddad to buy candy. Maybe if democracy wasn't secret, then those 55% could be made to pay for the costs of making the pennies directly out of their own pocket. Wonder how many would still be nostalgic then?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:We did it in Holland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of move should be left to wise men

      The kind of wise men that got us into this euro disaster, you mean?

    2. Re:We did it in Holland by dward90 · · Score: 1

      I'm an American, and I think getting rid of pennies entirely would be a great idea. Until we can convince everyone of that, though, making them cheaper to produce seems like the right move

      --
      My other sig is clever.
    3. Re:We did it in Holland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 'the people' decide they want to keep pennies because it will give them happiness (nostalgia), why not? Certainly we could spend the money on other/better things, but that's another story. This is not a 'failure of democracy'.

    4. Re:We did it in Holland by Hatta · · Score: 2

      This kind of move should be left to wise men

      Where are we going to find those? Democracy is essential because wise men never stay that way once their self interest is involved.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:We did it in Holland by fnj · · Score: 1

      Why do you have to convince "everyone"? You just have to convince the idiots in charge to stop making them.

    6. Re:We did it in Holland by daid303 · · Score: 1

      As fellow dutch man, I can say, stay away from the "aldi" they still give back cents and 2 cent coins. It's the only store that does that, and every other store will hate you for trying to pay with them (but they have to accept it)

    7. Re:We did it in Holland by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      It's a failure of democracy in the sense of the incompetents we put in office.

      I'm an American, and I think this makes perfect sense. Sure, you'll get some of the "I don't want to do it just because Europe does" nonsense, but in reality most people could see the point, and would probably agree.

      But do our politicians spend ANY time doing anything remotely close to logical, reasonable things like this? No, they spend all their time arguing larger issues that will never be resolved.

      For that matter, we just passed last year Obamacare which cost $billions (probably $trillions when you calculate the impact/cost to businesses), and will reduce the actual number of people not covered by insurance from about 14 million...to perhaps 8 million.

      Really, our system is flat-out broken.

      --
      -Styopa
    8. Re:We did it in Holland by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      2 points.

      First:

      inflation makes prices go up but currency stays the same.

      - currency stays the same, but inflation is increase of supply of it that is unmatched by productivity, and this means more money is chasing fewer goods, that's why prices rise and this story is more of an official admission by US government about inflation rate than any of their CBO BS numbers.

      Second:

      Maybe if democracy wasn't secret, then those 55% could be made to pay for the costs of making the pennies directly out of their own pocket. Wonder how many would still be nostalgic then?

      - US wasn't a democracy, it only became a democracy because some politicians found it simpler to stay in power by catering to the most idiotic masses, who would never be voting under normal Republic rules anyway.

      In any case, the entire point is moot because paper cannot be money and government cannot issue it.

    9. Re:We did it in Holland by geekoid · · Score: 1

      there are many wise men,. sadly they get vilified if their wisdom goes against a political ideology. Even when you can look at their history and see that everything they said would happen in their area of expertise, does happen.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. But the penny continues being a penny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many many times.

    Read "Making Money" by Pterry.

  15. Get rid of change altogether. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get rid of change altogether. EUROS AND DOLLARS AND YEN ONLY.

  16. Re:Pick up a penny, of course! by chromas · · Score: 1

    I thought lollies were illegal in Australia.

  17. How about 100 pennies = 1 dollar? by scorp1us · · Score: 1, Funny

    True it's not a gold standard, but it is some kind of standard that locks the dollar into some real value, rather than have some bureaucrats in Washington be able to devalue the dollar for their financial agendas.

    Its rather embarrassing when you think about it.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:How about 100 pennies = 1 dollar? by bored · · Score: 1

      Just think, if this keeps up, it will be possible to make money, by exchanging your dollars for pennies and selling them on the commodities market.... Then repeat....

      Of course, that is sort of what caused the last bust.

  18. On the subject by ledow · · Score: 1

    Would someone please back up my claim that when I came back from Tenerife once, having decided to blow all my spending money, all that remained in my pocket was:

    1 single coin - One half of one cent of one Euro.

    Everyone I've spoken to who's familiar with the Euro says that it never existed. Wish I'd kept the damn thing now. It was so worthless but I kept it until I'd got back to the UK (because it was funny to say, when my parents asked, that I had come back with money - and show them the most pathetically small denomination of Euro coin I could ever have found) and eventually threw it away.

    1. Re:On the subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A half-cent euro coin never existed. Yours, a European

    2. Re:On the subject by Asic+Eng · · Score: 3, Informative

      You probably got a coin from some other currency, either by mistake because it looked similar to a cent coin, or just because it looked similar. Maybe it was a US half cent coin. The Euro never had such a coin.

    3. Re:On the subject by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      You probably got a coin from some other currency, either by mistake because it looked similar to a cent coin, or just because it looked similar. Maybe it was a US half cent coin. The Euro never had such a coin.

      Would seem unlikely to find a piece of currency last struck over 150 years ago jingling around in your pocket. But I have to admit, it would be considerably more likely than finding a non-existent one. In either case, it's a shame he threw it out, that sucker'd be worth a mint, to coin a phrase.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    4. Re:On the subject by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Or an English half penny. Half Penny was often shortened (Cockney-ized?) to Ha'Penny [hay penny] as in the song Christmas is Coming.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    5. Re:On the subject by Jonner · · Score: 1

      That was indeed foolish to throw the coin away. Whatever it was, it sounds rare and interesting.

    6. Re:On the subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a fake, joke or casino coin.

  19. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tangible money interacts with the human animal differently than abstract mathematical concepts.

    Coins are the most tangible money, paper is more abstract, especially U.S. paper money that is all basically the same except for the numbers on it. Checks and credit cards are even more abstract - so much so that many people really can't handle them properly.

    Back in the day when a quarter would actually buy something worthwhile, if you tossed a quarter to somebody, they got a different visceral reaction than if they saw a penny coming. Paper, too, caused a different reaction because it was all inherently more valuable than coin. A coin more naturally "feels" like something you can instinctively trade or equate with other tangible objects of value. It takes many years of playing "The Price is Right" before most people get that same relationship with abstract prices, and again, some never really do.

    I don't think that a penny should cost $0.01 to produce, but I do think that there is real value in tangible coins that paper and credit cards lack.

  20. fractions of a cent by aztrailerpunk · · Score: 2

    cash register software engineer to Mgmt:
    "It's pretty brilliant. What it does is where there's a cash transaction, and the rounding are computed in the thousands a day in fractions of a dollar, which it usually rounds off. What this does is it takes those remainders and puts it into your account."
    Mgmt to Goverment:
    "Um, I'm gonna need you go ahead and come in tomorrow and pass this law. So if you could be here around nine, that would be great."

    --
    Foot placed squarely in mouth since 1983.
  21. The Change of Change by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    I suspect 53 percent of respondents simply have difficulty adjusting to things being different.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:The Change of Change by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's idiots like that we have to thank for the partially failed conversion to the Metric system.

  22. Re:Pick up a penny, of course! by griffjon · · Score: 1

    Way to drive home the stereotype that the only value for bitcoins is for anarchists and terrorists. Some of us would actually like to see a functional, non-fiat currency that doesn't raise the ire of governments such that they seek to shut it down.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  23. If it costs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2.4 cents to make a penny, would it make sense for me to go to my bank, empty out my bank account, convert all of my money into pennies, and then sell them for a 140% profit?

    So instead of having, say, $20,000 in the bank, I could have $48,000. And then I could just keep repeating the process until I was filthy rich. Thank God that I failed all of my math classes, just like the people that are running the American government.

    Baquack Obamailure is just the latest in a long stream of failures. It isn't his fault, though. When you elect someone JUST because they are black, not because they are qualified for the job, what do you expect to happen? Americans are dumb.

    1. Re:If it costs... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It's a crime to deface or destroy currency, so how would you get your 2.4 cents worth of raw materials? (Assuming, of course, that the 2.4 cents that it costs to make a penny comes from raw materials, and not labour and production machinery upkeep, transportation, and the like.) If you're going to get into crime, I'm sure there are lots of ways of making $28,000.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  24. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason we haven't done this yet is that the rounds used to produce pennies/nickels are made in the US. Meaning they are made in some Congressman's home district. So it comes up, the Congressman kills the bill, and then goes back home and gets to tell everyone that he saved their jobs.

    Same thing will happen this time. Multiply this waste of money times every Representative/Senator, and you'll see a big reason why the total debt (publicly held and privately held) of the US now exceeds annual GDP.

    In other words, Congress is stupid, the electorate is stupid for electing them, and there is no hope of any of this ever changing. We're doomed.

  25. Other numismatic history... by necro81 · · Score: 1

    While fishing around in my pile of change a while back, I came across a quarter that didn't sound quite right. The sound of it clattering on the table seemed a little weird, and my ear picked up on it right away. On closer inspection I saw that it was stamped 1964. Some research revealed that the reason it sounded different was because it was actually 90% silver. 1964 was the last year they did that. The following year they switched to a nickel-copper-nickel sandwich construction still in use today (visible when you look at the edge). By 1964 one quarter used more than $0.25 worth of silver. Today the silver content of that quarter is a bit more than $30 (prices fluctuate, but they are presently very high). I gather that these older silver quarters are a favorite of hobby jewelers, because it is fun to make jewelry from money. And, as Make magazine tells us, sometimes it's cheaper to make something out of real money than it is to buy.

    1. Re:Other numismatic history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there, the current melt value is about $6.08

      That's quite high, but it's not anywhere near $30

      http://www.coinflation.com/coins/1932-1964-Silver-Washington-Quarter-Value.html

    2. Re:Other numismatic history... by khr · · Score: 1

      a quarter that didn't sound quite right

      And after the research did that "weird" sound become "music to your ears"?

    3. Re:Other numismatic history... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Hehe yeah, I love that silver coin sound. Same thing here in Australia with the 1966 50 cent coins.

      1966 was the first, and only, year that the 50 cent coin was minted with 90% silver. 1967 onwards they are just a crappy blend of worthless metals, and sound totally different. You would never find a 1966 50c just floating around in change in Australia though, as unlike your example, they actually LOOK different too (they are round as opposed to the 12-sided shape of the standard 50c piece, so people would have identified them and removed them from circulation many decades ago).

    4. Re:Other numismatic history... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      My mistake: I was thinking of the price per ounce (about $30 presently). The silver quarter had about 0.19 troy oz in it, so your $6 is correct.

    5. Re:Other numismatic history... by swalve · · Score: 1

      You can see that in old movies and TV shows. Their change sounds different. For the record, I love the sound of a nice silver coin.

  26. Re:Pick up a penny, of course! by Troyusrex · · Score: 1

    I'd pick up a penny on the ground just like I often pick up any other trash, not for the monetary value but because it's litter. Non-biodegradable liter at that.

  27. Out of Luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where would I find my luck if pennies go away. Nickels, dimes and quarters are not lucky. In this day and age of the wolrd comming to an end I need all the luck I can find!

    A side note: If you had an endless line of pennies to pick up; you would make $60/hour bending down to pick up each one. So pick up that pennie even if it has it's Rear End pointing up in your face!

    Signed
    Pennie Pincher

  28. PLASTIC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    PLASTIC!!!!!

    USE PLASTIC!!!!!! Or find a way to metal coat plastic.

    Hollow the coin out- like some countries do to use less metal.
    There are lots of ways to lower the cost of making "useless" coins. If we even need them. I'd be fine with doing away with 1cent coins, 5cent coins, etc.

    For those worried about rounding- it already happens? Your gallon of "Gas" is not $3.44 it is $3.4499 - and your total bill never comes to an even penny. Your sales tax rarely calculates out to an even penny. You've been rounding what you spend for years and didn't even know it. Rounding up and down for the 5cents will help you sometimes- hurt you other times. It'll even out fair overall though.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:PLASTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, a use for all those spare buttons I get with clothing.

    2. Re:PLASTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have plastic coins in the UK. They come with children's playsets. Because no government would be stupid enough to make a legal tender based on a substance which was invented precisely for its ability to be easily molded at low cost.

    3. Re:PLASTIC by toetagger · · Score: 2

      I think even means something different than what you think it means

    4. Re:PLASTIC by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Too easy to falsify, unfortunately.

      (I know, who would fake a penny? But criminals do anything)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    5. Re:PLASTIC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily.

      Australia (and some other countries) makes bank notes out of plastic. I am sure there are ways to make it more difficult to falsify coins- plus- if the gain is very low (as it would be for coins) - that would deter people who would need to introduce millions of them into circulation to make it worthwhile.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:PLASTIC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      There are ways of making if more difficult to counterfeit- transparant windows with holographic images in the centre, etc.

      Plus the low value of the coins would make it less of an incentive to counterfeit them. The sheer volume of fake coins they would not only have to make- but find a way to use would make it impracitcal.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:PLASTIC by Cimexus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hear Canada is moving to the polymer banknotes too. Having lived in both Australia and the US, I can say the polymer bills really are superior in every way. Can't tear em (seriously, try to - you will fail, unless you actually use scissors or something to get it started), goes through the wash without a problem, much harder to fake. The polymer notes were invented in Australia but now a lot of countries are using them.

      Not to mention the fact that in all the polymer-note-using countries, the bills are different colors and sizes for each denomination (which has nothing to do with them being polymer admittedly). US currency is really irritating - you look in your wallet and see a ream of greenish paper (well, linen), side on, all the same size. You have no way of telling how much money you have without pulling it out, flicking through it, and looking at the demoninations. In Australia though and because they are different sizes and colors you can peek in your wallet and with a quick glance say "Ah yes, two yellows, an orange and a blue - I have $130". (Two 50s, a 20 and a 10)

    8. Re:PLASTIC by Megane · · Score: 1

      So how is a vending machine going to tell the difference? Are you suggesting that vending machine makers are now going to have to add some kind of laser scanner eyes to their coin mechs?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:PLASTIC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      American money is badly designed as you say.

      Most countries- no matter what the composition of their currency- you can tell at a glance by colour the value. It was certainly a lot easier in England to do. Also, having bills of identical size as they do in the US makes it hard for people with poor or no eye-sight to verify that what they are given is the correct amount.

      When bills are of different sizes it is easier for the blind to be more independant. Even coins in many countries have more permutations of their edges to make it easier for those with poor sight.

      Then there is the fact that American coins DO NOT HAVE NUMBERS on them. As far as I know America is the only country that does this. Coming to the US the first time it was a pain in the neck trying to figure out at first how much coins were worth. First few weeks I was constantly having to think- OK dime, nickel, which is which value?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    10. Re:PLASTIC by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      Cool idea. Maybe they could put some kind of magnetic identifier on the coin as well as the plastic. Then the actual cost of any purchase could be electronically moved from your account using special coin-readers. You'd only need to have one coin that you just reuse over and over. It could even do those annoying fractionals. Of course you'd need a secret ID of some sort in case you lost it.
      This is BRILLIANT
      I would call it the "hollow-plasti-coin-2000". Or maybe the "trouser press".

    11. Re:PLASTIC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Vending machines don't take pennies- and most new ones don't take nickels- I suspect nickels are going to be used less and less as time goes by. Personally, I don't think it is that much of a worry.

      It would cost the average man on the street more than 5cents to make a fake nickel- and no criminal enterprise is going to start faking coins just to trick a small percentage of old vending machines that accept nickels. There just isn't a business case when the profit margain for faking a coin is less than you would save just by buying that same product from a store.

      Until there is an underground conspiracy to conquer the world using Andy Capp Hot Fries corn based snacks- it isn't a worry.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    12. Re:PLASTIC by compro01 · · Score: 1

      I hear Canada is moving to the polymer banknotes too.

      Yep, the new Frontier series is polymer. They released the new $100 in November, the new $50 comes out next month, and the remainder will be out by the end of 2013.

      We're also releasing new loonies and toonies made of plated steel (rather than the current solid nickel) this year. The vending machine companies have been running around to update their machines to handle them.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    13. Re:PLASTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the basic problem with making it cost less than a penny to make a penny.

      Right now there are 0 safeguards against falsifying coins, but it's not cost effective to actually do it. make it cost effective to produce coins and sudenly it'll also be cost effective for joe-counterfeiter.

    14. Re:PLASTIC by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Lazy: When reading a simple umber is to difficult.

      Why is asking what a specific coin is worth more difficult then asking what a specific color piece of paper is?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:PLASTIC by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      And one does have to ask. - and one does figure it out eventually.

      It's like the Microsoft office ribbon thing. Yeah, eventually you'll stumble your way around and find what you need- and you can call Microsoft and ask where they moved the "activate clippy" functionality. That doesn't mean it is efficient or the best way to do things. It is counter-intuitive and open for error. Now granted- when you're talking about sub-dollar amounts the amount lost through error is minimal- but it is still annoying and a bad design that they can't even put the value of a coin on the coin.

      As for the "color" piece of paper and what it is worth- it's not that hard. If you're in a country that uses simoleans and it says "10" it is worth 10 simoleans. If it says "20" it is worth 20 simoleans. If it has a picture of a train and says "made by milton bradley" - someone is tricking you with monopoly money.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    16. Re:PLASTIC by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      The point is, for the banknotes at least, you can't see the number unless you pull the corner of the bill out of your wallet. So it does require a fair bit of extra effort to figure out how much you have compared to just looking at the colours (which are visible even edge-on ... don't need to touch the bills at all).

      I'm with you on the lack of numbers on the coins though - you're right: learning that a dime is 0.10 and a nickel is 0.05 is the same kind of exercise as learning which colour banknote is which denomination in other countries. Still, it would be nice if they put the numbers on to ASSIST that learning (after all, the coloured banknotes DO also have the numbers on them). When I first went to the US I was always getting them backwards, because retardedly, the coin with the smaller value (nickel) is BIGGER than the coin with the larger value (dime) (and of course the quarter is bigger than both of them).

    17. Re:PLASTIC by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Interesting, you're doing it from largest to smallest denomination. That's the opposite of what happened here in Oz: the $5 was first, and we worked our way up from there, introducing one polymer banknote at a time.

      Come to think of it, the Canadian approach makes more sense: start with the notes that have the least circulation, so that if problems arise, it affects less people. In Australia the very earliest $5s that were rolled out had a 'bug' (so to speak) with the printing: you could rub the Queen's face off ;) They fixed it pretty quick though.

    18. Re:PLASTIC by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Why is asking what a specific coin is worth more difficult then asking what a specific color piece of paper is?

      Do you have problems with reading comprehension are are you being willfully obtuse? He said the banknotes were different colours. He didn't say that was the sole distinction.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:PLASTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since only the $100s are polymer in Canada so far, I've been hesitant to test the claims about tearing.

  29. Historical precedent by nicomede · · Score: 3, Informative

    Along the history of the Roman Empire, the amount of gold in the Aureus coin consistently decreased as the need for more (cheap) money increased, to fund the military campaigns and buy peace from the barbarians. It could only last so long. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aureus

    1. Re:Historical precedent by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's not a historical precedent, because Roman Empire was effectively on the gold standard - and so decreasing the amount of gold in the coin actually devalued the coin, because prices remained stable in gold. Decreasing the amount of nickel in a penny is not going to have the same effect in a economy that's already based on fiat money through and through.

      I mean, you're not worried that the ink they use for dollar bills gets cheaper next year, are you?

    2. Re:Historical precedent by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Never mind that the roman economy functioned for decades before introducing their first gold coin by using copper coins.

      Then again, the interpretations of roman currency history is a hot topic to this day.

      On that note, i found this a interesting read a few years back:
      http://www.amazon.com/Lost-Science-Money-Mythology-Story/dp/1930748035/

      Seems to be out of stock now tho.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  30. Oh Slashdot, you disappointed me! by dmbasso · · Score: 3, Funny

    I came here only for the penis jokes, but none so far!

    --
    `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    1. Re:Oh Slashdot, you disappointed me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well thats for your 2 cents... LOL there I am now on the board!

    2. Re:Oh Slashdot, you disappointed me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke is that your Copper Rod is only 2.5% copper, and it's plating at that. And while you may have an valid argument that a Zinc Rod (http://www.doctoroz.com/videos/daily-dose-zinc) is nothing to sneeze at (http://www.coldcure.com/html/doeszinc.html), I think we all agree that Real Steel is the way to go here.

  31. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yep, pennies go in the trash. Fuck those things.

  32. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the paper costs more over the life of the currency. Paper money has to be re-printed every couple years. Coins stay in circulation for decades.

  33. Sounder Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is not that the pennies are so expensive to make. The problem is that they are tied to a dollar that is so cheap. Cut spending and quit allowing the Federal Reserve to print so many of them. This causes the dollar to be worth less and less. And since they are defined to be 100 to a dollar, it's no wonder that eventually the dollar is NOT worth enough to equal 100 pennies anymore. Make the dollar worth something by not printing so many of them.

  34. Money Issues by lcam · · Score: 1

    We could just eliminate coin and paper currency all together. We can get by just fine with plastic, checks and other promissory type notes.

    1. Re:Money Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can get by just fine with plastic, checks and other promissory type notes. ..making it compulsory for every transaction you make to be fully traceable by the government. But that's alright isn't it? Everybody trusts the government not to abuse their powers don't they?

      Are you also going to volunteer to have a govt. camera in your bedroom/bathroom/up your wazoo?

  35. Re:Pick up a penny, of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoins are a fiat currency. They only have value because people think they do.

  36. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by windcask · · Score: 1

    I don't think that a penny should cost $0.01 to produce, but I do think that there is real value in tangible coins that paper and credit cards lack.

    Sure, I understand your point...but if your concern is holdings that won't wax and wane with the money markets, why not purchase commodities like gold or silver?

  37. new weight new meters by sziring · · Score: 1

    If the weight changes, it will only screw with the vending machines and parking meters. This of course will jack up the prices, as someone will incur the cost to modify the machines (the end users)! But hey, there will be more jobs created as a result.

    --
    www.moonnext.com
    1. Re:new weight new meters by OiBoy · · Score: 1

      This was true when the dollar coin was replaced. The replacement had to have the same dimensions and weight. But, show me a vending machine that accepts pennies...

      --
      `fortune -o`
    2. Re:new weight new meters by revoldub · · Score: 1

      Which machines/meters accept pennies?

    3. Re:new weight new meters by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Not exactly a vending machine, but the automated toll collectors on the RMA in Richmond VA do accept pennies. They have a sign that says "No pennies please", but they do work. They just take forever for the machine to count fill up the change bin quickly.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  38. I want my change back by ebh · · Score: 1

    ...from my purchase of *exactly* one gallon of gas.

  39. And fractional cent gas by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    When gas was in double digits it made sense to have a fractional cent. Now that's it's triple digits, why do we need 4 digits of precision to pump gas? I'm sure it can be shown that a gas pump cannot measure that accurately. It's always like $3.699. $3.70 is only .027% different.
    Of course it's just fool the customer - most people will drive 5 miles to get $3.699 gas instead of $3.70 because "it's a penny cheaper!".

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:And fractional cent gas by Megane · · Score: 1

      You know some place in the US that doesn't have that .9 painted into the sign background? I've never ever seen a gas price that didn't end in .9 cents per gallon.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  40. let's go a bit farther by Cmdr-Absurd · · Score: 1

    Get rid of the penny and the one dollar bill.
    We save money on printing the dollar bill and make room in cash register for a one dollar coin.
    And the 2 dollar bill.

  41. Little coins, a hassle by mapuche · · Score: 1

    Every time I travel to the US, return with a bunch little coins. I can't even trade then at the airport. You need a lot to get a dollar. Just round to the nearest dime.

  42. It's been done before here in the US by Covalent · · Score: 3, Informative

    We used to have half-penny coins (and others). They were done away with for the same reason the penny (and probably nickels and dimes, too) should be: they became essentially worthless.

    But, since this process makes sense, it probably won't happen. This IS America, after all. We have a reputation to maintain.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:It's been done before here in the US by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The only coin we've had smaller than a cent was the half-cent, which was done away with 1857 when it was worth about 11 cents in today's money. That left the smallest coin as the cent, which at the time was worth almost as much a modern quarter. Originally, there were going to be coins called 'mils' which were to be worth one-tenth of a cent (or one thousandth of a dollar, hence the name), but the founding fathers decided that it wasn't worth minting a coin worth so little at the time.

  43. "More telling..." by oneiron · · Score: 1

    How is that more tellling? We've got an american hero in ben franklin who said that 'a penny saved is a penny earned," and many people believe in the superstition that finding a penny is good luck. Given these two things, it's not surprising or telling in the least that 76 percent of respondents would pick up a penny if they saw it on the ground.

    1. Re:"More telling..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've missed the point. 21% of people have admitted they pick up useless stuff from the ground. Government now knows more and more janitor jobs need to be created.

  44. Obama can't get rid of pennies by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Most of his supporters are still being paid using them.

    *ducks*

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Obama can't get rid of pennies by Megane · · Score: 2

      He promised Hope and Change... and now he wants to take our Change away from us!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Obama can't get rid of pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dawg, you got it all wrong! Pennies? Shit... We use the EBT brotha.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o64Fz-KW1Dk

    3. Re:Obama can't get rid of pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ducks are Obama supporters? Surely not Scrooge McDuck, the animated epitome of the 1%.

    4. Re:Obama can't get rid of pennies by swalve · · Score: 1

      You joke, but every time someone tries to get rid of the Penny, some clown from Illinois screams bloody murder because that would mean Lincoln's visage wouldn't be on a coin anymore. The solution would be to put Obama on the penny, and then the haters would outlaw it instantly.

  45. drop pennies, nickels, quarters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Round to the dime! Just have dimes and 50 cent pieces (the size of a nickel). The US used to have a 1/2 cent coin it dropped because it had the purchasing power of today's dime. Oh, then get rid of paper dollars since they are pretty expensive and pointless.

  46. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

    I get the point about coins being tangible. but the feeling of tangible can change. When I lived in Japan, at first holding a hand full'o' Yen didn't feel like real money. After several months, i returned home and the Pound no longer felt like real money; but I was still familiar with it. When I go back to japan the Yen seems like proper money. I've complete broken the more tangible link in my brain. Money for me = How many hours work Vs how much beer can I buy. If that stays constant then everything is cool and I don't have to panic :)

  47. All this over a freaking Cent by sensationull · · Score: 1

    Seriously, we ditched 1c, 2c and even 5c here in NZ ages ago almost everyone pays with eftpos - direct bank account debit cards - anyway so actual physical money is more of an inconvenient throwback than anything else.

    Every so often the US makes me think I'm living in the future, this is one of those times.

    1. Re:All this over a freaking Cent by sensationull · · Score: 1

      Bad form replying to my own comment but I just thought I'd add we also killed of the 1 and 2 dollar bill more than a decade ago, replacing them with coins, there has even been talk of doing the same for the five dolar bill. Before anyone tried to pin this on a currency worth so much less per dollar than the USD, check the exchange rate, its getting quite close.

    2. Re:All this over a freaking Cent by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Let me know when NZ has a currency used around the world, and for almost every major purchase. Then we can discuss global impact of what some people would view as devaluing the US monetary system by removing a denomination.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:All this over a freaking Cent by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Let me know when NZ has a currency used around the world, and for almost every major purchase.

      It's true that oil is is usually dealt in US dollars, but that doesn't mean that when a tanker docks someone hands the captain a suitcase full of Benjamins. In the few cases where totally legitimate businessmen (not drug~ or gun runners at all, no no no) are using large amounts of actual physical money rather than numbers on a 'puter, you can bet your bottom dollar they aren't faffing around with quarters.

      Then we can discuss global impact of what some people would view as devaluing the US monetary system by removing a denomination.

      s/people/stupid people/

      By what mechanism would removing the penny alter the value of a $100 bill?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  48. Not sympathetic. by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it currently costs the federal government 2.4 cents to make a penny and 11.2 cents for every nickel.

    I have absolutely no sympathy for the government in this regard. At one point the US was on the gold standard. (That was after it got off the wampum standard and the tobacco standard.) At that time the $20 gold coin cost $20 to make, by definition. (Actually, just a little bit more because of seigniorage.) The dollar was defined as a certain weight of a certain purity of gold. The coin was merely the government's guarantee of the weight and purity. However, the government decided to finance part of its spending through inflation. Since you can't do that while on a gold standard (other than through new gold discoveries or processes) they had to do away with it.

    The government likes inflation because 1) they get to spend it first, 2) they get to pay their debts with worth-less money, and 3) tax bracket creep allowed them to increase tax rates without voting for them. (This last one has since been eliminated by indexing tax brackets to inflation, but it was a major component for many years.) First they inflated the money supply, and the gold in the gold coins became worth more than the face value, and the gold coins had to go. They continued inflating and the silver in the dollar, half-dollar, quarter, and dimes became worth more than their face values, so the government had to find something worth less to make them out of. Now they have continued until the nickel and penny are worth more than their face values.

    I, for one, think it's time for the government to stop financing their spending through inflation.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
    1. Re:Not sympathetic. by ihavnoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure if you understand basic economics, but a world without inflation would be much worse. The main purpose of inflation is to encourage people to spend money, or at least, save it in a bank, rather than keep the money in your closet. Once there is no inflation, or even a small amount of deflation, it acts as a positive feedback - as the value of money increases, people tries to get hold of more cache, and that reduces the total supply of cash within the society, and it further increases the value of cash. Eventually, all spending dries up, jobs will disappear (since there is nobody who's trying to by ANYTHING), and the poor guys will suffer more seriously, since the rich guys (=people with lots of cash) will have their assets' value increase automatically without doing anything, while the poor guys have no job, no cash, and nothing to buy anyway. That is precisely what happened on the great depression.

      What we need is a MODERATE amount of inflation - not sure how much is the right amount, but high enough to avoid the deflation spiral, and low enough to avoid hyperinflation.

      Plus, what's wrong with government spending? The government is supposed to represent the people, and hence, the spending should be something for the people. If you find government spending to be evil, then you should have a better, more sensible government, and stop blaming the spending itself.

    2. Re:Not sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed. i can't think of better proof of inflation (shove your c.p.i. up your butt, bernanke) than this. we've devalued our currency so much that we can't afford to print money.

    3. Re:Not sympathetic. by Kozz · · Score: 2

      The concept of money is a kind of fiction -- a shared, collective illusion in which we all participate. Which is by no means to suggest it's not worth something -- it's worth exactly what our economy says it's worth. But are you advocating a return to the gold standard?? You probably want to think long and hard about that. Does it make sense that a country should tie the size of its economy to the arbitrary physical amount of a precious metal which can be found within its borders?

      Have a read/listen, be enlightened. Why we left the gold standard.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    4. Re:Not sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The concept of money is a kind of fiction -- a shared, collective illusion in which we all participate. Which is by no means to suggest it's not worth something -- it's worth exactly what our economy says it's worth. But are you advocating a return to the gold standard?? You probably want to think long and hard about that. Does it make sense that a country should tie the size of its economy to the arbitrary physical amount of a precious metal which can be found within its borders?

      Have a read/listen, be enlightened. Why we left the gold standard.

      Are you saying the "size" of the economy is the sum of the currency units in circulation? Do we need to print currency to grow the economy?

    5. Re:Not sympathetic. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The thing is that when U.S. money was gold coins, it cost more than a dollar to make a dollar coin. That is, the dollar coin contained $1 worth of gold, you then had to pay someone to make the presses that were used to stamp the coins, you had to pay someone to actually run the presses to stamp the coins. There were other costs involved as well.
      Of course it costs more than a penny to make a penny.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    6. Re:Not sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are pros and cons to any type of money, including the gold standard.

      One of the great advantages was that it's pretty clear to everyone when the government is playing make-believe with the economy. When the gold for a dollar was worth more than the dollar was, gold flowed out of America. The government couldn't cheat because it was easily to call them on it. Now more and more of the economy is imaginary or meta, and nobody knows what's real, at least until the papered-over defects and deficits cause the whole house of cards to come crashing down.

    7. Re:Not sympathetic. by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Yes. Learn some basic economics please.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    8. Re:Not sympathetic. by FsG · · Score: 1

      Well said! Here's a neat graph that hammered this point home for me: http://whyisupportronpaul.us/

      They talk specifically about the rising cost of gasoline, and how that is 100% due to inflation, whereas the actual cost of gas hasn't gone up at all over the last 40 years!

      --
      I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
    9. Re:Not sympathetic. by FsG · · Score: 1

      That NPR article is pretty outrageous. He writes that everyone tried to get their gold at the same time and there wasn't enough to go around, therefore the British government decided to stop giving out gold altogether!

      What I see here is criminal fraud, perpetuated by the government. The paper bills were supposed to have been claim slips for gold, with a government *promise* that if they ever wanted to claim the gold, it would be there. The government of Britain clearly broke its promise, as there wasn't enough gold to cover all the claim slips that had been issued. Rather than own up to this mistake and make reforms to avoid this in the future, they abandoned the gold standard to make it easier to perpetuate such fraud in the future.

      --
      I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
    10. Re:Not sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, I recently saw this graph of historical gas prices adjusted for inflation. Obviously, gas and crude oil are not the same thing, but the two graphs are rather different. I wonder why. (Not disputing your link; I am actually curious about the difference. I assume it has something to do with normalizing for inflation not being the same as comparing to the price of gold.)

      More importantly, using gold (or any physical resource) as a basis for an economy makes no sense. For a quick list of the issues, here's Wikipedia's list of disadvantages (of course, you can scroll up to see the list of advantages). The main issue is the first one in that list: being on the gold standard is an assertion that your entire economy is worth no more than the total amount of gold in the world. Which is ridiculous. That's way too low a value for the US economy.

    11. Re:Not sympathetic. by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you understand basic economics,

      I think I do. I've made an amateur study of it for several years.

      but a world without inflation would be much worse.

      I find I must disagree.

      The main purpose of inflation is to encourage people to spend money, or at least, save it in a bank, rather than keep the money in your closet.

      No. The main purposes of inflation is to give government additional money to spend, to devalue its debts, and to increase taxation without voting on rate increases, as I mentioned in my earlier post. People don't need encouragement to spend money. Actual hoarding of currency has always been a tiny fraction of hand-to-hand money. The encouragement to deposit currency in a bank is the interest the bank pays on the deposits, and that incentive works even better during times of deflation.

      Once there is no inflation, or even a small amount of deflation, it acts as a positive feedback - as the value of money increases, people tries to get hold of more cache, and that reduces the total supply of cash within the society, and it further increases the value of cash.

      No. Under deflationary periods there is incentive to invest, since the return on investment is going to be paid with more valuable currency. You're trying to describe a dichotomy between normalcy and recession. The real dichotomy is between consumptive spending versus investment spending.

      Eventually, all spending dries up, jobs will disappear (since there is nobody who's trying to by ANYTHING), and the poor guys will suffer more seriously, since the rich guys (=people with lots of cash) will have their assets' value increase automatically without doing anything, while the poor guys have no job, no cash, and nothing to buy anyway.

      You're right about one thing. Inflation in one sense helps the poor, because it devalues their debts, and it harms the rich, because it devalues their investments. Similarly deflation harms the poor, because it increases their debts in real terms, and it helps the rich, because it increases their investments. I happen to think that both are evil, since one steals from the rich and the other steals from the poor. A more just policy would be to leave their mutually agreed upon contracts unaffected. In times of unchanging inflation it finally doesn't matter because the lenders are going to increase the interest on their loan offers, because they are going to be unwilling make loans at a loss. In the interim it's justice that matters.

      What we need is a MODERATE amount of inflation - not sure how much is the right amount, but high enough to avoid the deflation spiral, and low enough to avoid hyperinflation.

      What we need is zero inflation. Anything else is fraudulent.

      Plus, what's wrong with government spending? The government is supposed to represent the people, and hence, the spending should be something for the people. If you find government spending to be evil, then you should have a better, more sensible government, and stop blaming the spending itself.

      I never said that there was anything wrong with government spending. What I said was that they shouldn't finance it through inflation.

      ~Loyal

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
    12. Re:Not sympathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. Under deflationary periods there is incentive to invest, since the return on investment is going to be paid with more valuable currency.

      I suggest you investigate minor things like recorded history, where deflationary periods have always caused hoarding. The incentive to invest goes away rather quickly if the rate of return doesn't beat the gain in value from just holding on to money.

      Inflation in one sense helps the poor, because it devalues their debts, and it harms the rich, because it devalues their investments. Similarly deflation harms the poor, because it increases their debts in real terms, and it helps the rich, because it increases their investments. I happen to think that both are evil, since one steals from the rich and the other steals from the poor.

      You're a complete idiot for many reasons, but this one is especially offensive. You seem to consider it equivalent to "steal from" the rich with inflation, or "steal from" the poor with deflation.

      If you steal from the poor, you directly influence their quality of life. It's hard to get everyone to agree on what defines "poor", but personally I'd pick "Has troubles scraping together enough income to meet necessities, with no possibility of saving for retirement". Steal from that guy, you're literally taking food out of his mouth, or forcing him to move to a worse living situation, or work longer hours, or do with less medical care, etc.

      A rich man, on the other hand, will not be materially impacted by the level of mild inflation which is generally thought to be healthy for economies by sane people who pay attention to history. In fact, rich men seldom have difficulty investing their savings at rates which easily beat inflation. So really, the only way you "hurt" rich men with inflation is that they don't get richer quite as fast as they might otherwise. Boo fucking hoo, that makes life sooooo hard for them.

      Basically, you think that a tiny economic injury done to a tiny number of people who already have all their needs met is 100% equivalent to real harm done to a much larger number of people who are struggling to scrape by. That means you are a bad person.

      Another fundamental problem with your argument is that money isn't wealth, the goods and services which people trade for money are. The real function of money in an economy is not a store of wealth which must be protected by keeping the value of money constant, it is to act as economic lubricant allowing people to more easily trade goods and services. Basic economics predicts that the more economic exchanges people are able to partake in, the more real wealth a society generates as a whole, and the more each individual benefits. The reason we aren't all bartering is that use of money permits us to make many more trades than barter ever possibly could.

      Mild inflation has been proven over and over again to encourage the circulation of money. As I've laid out above, by circulating, money helps an economy generate real wealth. Inflation is therefore a good thing which benefits everyone. Even the rich: increasing the prosperity of the low and middle income classes gives them more excess money to spend on goods and services, which translates to more investment opportunities (in the businesses which serve the needs of low and middle income people).

      Also, I would point out that the very notion of a fixed, constant value of money is an impossible dream. The value of money (like that of anything else which people trade) is not even constant at any given point in time! It varies wildly from one individual to the next, mostly based on how much of it each individual has. $1 is worth far, far more to a poor man than a rich man, because the amount of goods and services the poor man can buy for $1 will have a noticeable positive impact on his quality of life, whereas a rich man literally would not notice the absence of $1 from his bank account because all his needs are met and he has plenty of luxuries to boot. It's called marginal value, a concept you seem to have completely failed to grasp during your "amateur" studies of economics.

    13. Re:Not sympathetic. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If you think the "size" of the economy is the sum of the currency units in circulation, as would be implied by your answer to the ACs question, then it's you that needs to do some studying. Start with "velocity".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Not sympathetic. by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1

      I suggest you investigate minor things like recorded history, where deflationary periods have always caused hoarding.

      I agree that it causes hoarding. I never said it doesn't. What I said is that hoarding has been a tiny fraction of hand-to-hand currency. Both can be true simultaneously, which implies that your claim doesn't contradict mine.

      You're a complete idiot for many reasons

      I'm always pleased to see insults, because my experience has been that people who resort to them don't have a cogent argument to offer in their place.

      You seem to consider it equivalent to "steal from" the rich with inflation, or "steal from" the poor with deflation.

      Well, let me make it a little more plain, so that you don't have to infer from my statements. Stealing from people is offensive. It's offensive if it's done at the point of a gun, and it's offensive if it's done through inflation. Not to stray too far afield, but I think murder is offensive too, regardless of the amount of wealth that the victim owns. I feel similarly about assault and battery, breaking and entering, civil rights violations, and those little hats with the propellers on top.

      Boo fucking hoo, that makes life sooooo hard for them.

      Are you a member of any particular political group or association? The reason I ask is that I would like to have a label to apply to people who have so little compassion for such a large portion of their fellow man.

      Basically, you think that a tiny economic injury done to a tiny number of people who already have all their needs met is 100% equivalent to real harm done to a much larger number of people who are struggling to scrape by. That means you are a bad person.

      See, the neat thing here is that inflation is a continuum. We could have lots of inflation--something that's sometimes called a hyperinflation--or less inflation or a little inflation, or a little deflation, or a lot of deflation, or a whole lot of deflation. Similarly, we can have a whole lot of harm to the rich, or a little, or a little harm to the poor, or a lot. (Actually, that's mis-stated. What we can have is harm to debtors or harm to creditors; however, I am willing to stipulate that there is a positive correlation between the rich and between creditors.) The neat thing that I've skipped over thus far is that we can also have no inflation or deflation. That's how a continuum works. It's only needful to try to keep inflation at zero percent, and we have the minimum amount of harm to the whole population.

      Also, I would point out that the very notion of a fixed, constant value of money is an impossible dream.

      What an interesting claim! It would be ever so much more palatable with a little evidence. Would you be willing to offer some? Let us stipulate that the Federal Reserve System's "market basket" is to be the measure of inflation. I understand that the Fed's current goal is 1% inflation, which they justify through the concept of "replacement value." What's to keep them from dropping the replacement value concept and aiming for 0%?

      It's called marginal value, a concept you seem to have completely failed to grasp during your "amateur" studies of economics.

      I thank you for your attempt to educate me, but I've known about marginal value for about two decades. I think it's just about the fifth most important concept in economics just behind division of labor, comparative advantage, supply and demand, and the rôle of prices in a free market. However, marginal value is completely irrelevant to our discussion. We've been talking about inflation, which is a macroeconomic measure of the value of a unit of money in terms of aggregate goods. The preferences of an individual for a unit of currency are subsumed when discussing macroeconomics and aggregates.

      Let me make it a little more concrete. Let's suppose Alvin has $1000 he wishes to lend, and let's suppose Bob wants to borrow $1000. Suppose they agree that Bob will

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
  49. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if your concern is holdings that won't wax and wane with the money markets, why not purchase commodities like gold or silver?

    It's not really my concern, but, looking at the "value" of gold from 1975 to the present, I'd rather keep my savings in an imaginary construct like the U.S. dollar invested in a mix of index funds and bond issues. When that system collapses, everyone scrambles to prop it back up again, when the value of gold stagnates and declines in real terms for decades at a time, the world yawns.

  50. inflation? by cashman73 · · Score: 2

    If Ron Paul is right, we'll eventually be ditching the penny altogether once its completely worthless. In its place, there will be a new $100 gold coin, which will eventually carry the same value as today's penny.

    1. Re:inflation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the gold coin is made of real gold and isn't incrediblly small, then it will never have the same purchasing power as a zinc penny.

  51. older pennies are culled by Wansu · · Score: 1

    There ain't very many pre-1983 pennies in circulation because collectors and metal investors cull them. Those are worth nearly 3 cents each. Some call copper the poor man's silver. It will be interesting to see whether the zinc pennies will be culled as zinc goes above $1/lb. What would they make the new ones out of? plastic?

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    1. Re:older pennies are culled by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Those who are mining their change for the all copper 1982 pennies and all pre 1982 pennies really want to be able to melt them which you can't at the moment. Also the average lifespan of a coin is 20 years so the fact that there aren't many left shouldn't be a surprise.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:older pennies are culled by swalve · · Score: 1

      It's hard to get the zinc out of the pennies because the copper is coating it. I guess you could come up with some kind of de-electroplating process, but that seems time consuming.

    3. Re:older pennies are culled by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The people pulling pennies out of circulation are pulling out the older cents made until 1982 which are almost pure copper. They aren't bothering with the zinc coins, as the amount of copper is negligible and the zinc isn't that valuable (yet).

  52. Simple solution... by DigiTechGuy · · Score: 2

    Stop inflating our currency! Inflation is government produced and is effectively a hidden tax on all of us.

    1. Re:Simple solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will never happen.. in fact the federal reserve has just officially announced their plans for the next 20 years, which of course includes inflation which they claim is for the good of the economy of course. In 20 years, everything will cost 50% more, and that's their wonderful plan.

    2. Re:Simple solution... by issicus · · Score: 0

      indeed , make the penny worth more. 7.99 why not make it 799.00 ?

  53. Gas prices by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Gas prices in the US have been set to the TENTH of a cent and are rounded off now.
    So what difference would currency to the nearest 10 cents mean? And if you pay by credit card it ISN'T rounded off.
    Reminds me of an electronic fraud scheme where a hacker stole all the tenth's of cents left over from bank accounts.

    1. Re:Gas prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of an electronic fraud scheme where a hacker stole all the tenth's of cents left over from bank accounts.

      You mean Office Space?

    2. Re:Gas prices by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an electronic fraud scheme where a hacker stole all the tenth's of cents left over from bank accounts.

      You mean Office Space?

      No, Richard "great balls of fire" Pryor. [citation]

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:Gas prices by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And if you pay by credit card it ISN'T rounded off.

      Interesting, because I've never seen more than two decimal places[1] on my statement.

      I've also worked on EFTPOS systems for service stations. While prices & some intermediate calculations were done at a higher resolution, the final value never includes excess decimals.

      [1] of the major unit, i.e. Dollar, Pound, Euro.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  54. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just spend them, that's what they're for. Then you won't end-up with a jar of pennies cluttering up anywhere.

    When your lunch comes to $9.08, pay the 8 cents in pennies AND YOU WON'T RECEIVE ANY MORE.

  55. Cheaper pennies is no pennies by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Dump them for the nuisance they are to everyone and enact laws that dictate how rounding is performed to the nearest 5c. While at it, scrap $1 and $2 bills, and use coins for those.

    Alternatively the US could do what places like Indonesia has done with virtually worthless small denominations. Shops give you sweets in your change. This would be the measure the powerful boiled sweet lobby would recommend.

    1. Re:Cheaper pennies is no pennies by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands there is a proverb:

      Wie het kleine niet eert is het grote niet waard.

      If you don't honor the small, you're not worth the big.

      But then don't worry - the Dutch (and the Finns too) don't accept 1 and 2 Eurocent coins for payments anymore either.

      And while you're at it - just abolish all cash payments. Governments would love that!

  56. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50 mill here , 100 mill htere and it al adds up to less hten a billion or ten
    yet 16 trillion looms
    better unemploy some military OH WAIT
    you cant and thats the end when no one gets cash

  57. Collect them , then trade them in. by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    I throw all my pennies in a coffee mug on my desk. When the mug fills up, I dump the contents into a bag and walk it down to a local bank which has free coin counting for the public (with no surcharges). Generally, I have enough to get a "dirty water hotdog" or two for lunch from the street corner vendor.

    During my walk to the bank, I may end up passing a panhandler who can always be counted on to ask for money. As long as I don't see them holding a cigarette or cell phone (things they apparently can afford to buy), I might just give them the bag of pennies instead and point them to the bank.

    1. Re:Collect them , then trade them in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During my walk to the bank, I may end up passing a panhandler who can always be counted on to ask for money. As long as I don't see them holding a cigarette or cell phone (things they apparently can afford to buy), I might just give them the bag of pennies instead and point them to the bank.

      You realize there are charities where you can donate your old phone to the homeless, right? So they can call for help if they get into trouble.

  58. Gresham's law by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    This effect is called Gresham's law.

  59. Re:$0.95 bullshit by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well for the record I set my clock an hour and 45 minutes ahead so that I am on time! : )

    But yes, $0.95 did seem lower because with 5% MA sales tax before they changed it it was still under a buck, so it was good for impulse sales. (Now that Taxachussetts changed it, it's back to being BS - you have to grab the penny from the Take-A-Penny tray to not bust open a second bill and get a handfull of crappy change.)

    But in my opinion the real reason you can't eliminate pennies is that the chaos you'd cause in Accounting would far outstrip the "nicety" of not having pennies. Hell, Nickels are equally silly. Dimes are a close call. I stop my valuation at quarters, which are still good for laundry machines.

    If suddenly there were no pennies the entire world would play the Office Space Game of "which way can I pocket the difference to my own benefit."

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  60. There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The reason is that if there is change for a tenner (for example), then the tenner has to be rung through the till and the change (one penny) returned. If the price was a tenner, then the till receptionist could pocket the tenner and claim the goods must have been stolen.

    This, though, only makes sense when the "$9.99" is the customer-with-tax price.

    1. Re:There is a reason for it by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually one of the most common reasons (in retail at least) for .99, .98, .97 price suffixes is to bin things together, and to help salespeople identify things that the retailer wants sold.
      Where I managed for a while (a national camera chain), .99 was the high margin items, .98 was the low margin items, .97 was the manufacturer promotion items, and .95 was the discontinued and clearance items.
      As a salesperson you knew the folling to be true:
      $x.99 == good commission
      $x.98 == crap commission, worth selling unless you could bundle on a few .99 items
      $x.97 == crap commission, but the manufacturer would provide a "spiff" to offset that
      $x.95 == sell it. there was a bonus to get rid of stuff that was disco'd. Don't bother trying to special order it though, because if the warehouse still had any it wouldn't have this price code. If you need to discount it further to sell it, do it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:There is a reason for it by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      $x.98 == crap commission, worth selling unless you could bundle on a few .99 items

      I accidentally a word there... *Not* worth selling

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  61. Money Illusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what excuses will those people come up with to keep cent/penny around? Nostalgia?

    Close. Money illusion. especially among old people. They remember the days when a penny could actually buy something - a couple of pieces of candy, for example.

    I once mistakenly griped about how we should get rid of the penny - this was in 1989 - and some old person sniped back, "a 100 pennies make a dollar!"

    Today, I would show them a dime and inform them that this is what the dollar of their youth is worth now.

    1. Re:Money Illusion by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      With a single pre-1965 silver dime you can buy a gallon of gas. Try doing it with a modern dime.

      Of-course it took near 20 cents prior to 1965 to buy a gallon of gas AND you got more service for it - washing fluid check, oil check, wiping the windshield.

      ALL THIS while the actual consumption in USA has been declining for a few years now. This is funny to see Keynesian charlatans squirm faced with this so called "paradox". Well, to them it is paradox, not to actual economists. A slump in consumption does not cause lowering of prices because production goes down even faster.

      Of-course in US the real problem is inflation - all the money printing has destroyed the value of the dollar and dollar has lost its meaning in 1971 anyway, when US actually defaulted on its debts.

      But your calculation is incorrect, to that old (pre 1965) person the value of a dollar fell over 40 times.

  62. Dear Uncle Barack by LSD-OBS · · Score: 0
    --
    Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  63. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    I've been having a disconnect lately with the price of gasoline. I will agonize over a $50 tech gadget purchase that I might make once every 3 months, searching for that last $5 discount, comparing competing products, etc. Then, I'll take a weekend trip and toss $85 of fuel in the vehicle, it's just.... wrong. I grew up in the '70s when travel by automobile was nearly free, the relevant cost was time more than money. Maybe 120mpg hybrids will bring those days back for awhile.

    My point on the tangible is that people, as a big messy impossible to characterize group, do tend to accurately abstract the value of a (steady valued) coin you can hold more readily than they do numbers on a credit card slip, or coupons, or travel mile points.... In the U.S. we don't trade coins over $0.25 in value on any regular basis... I think we'd have better money management by people overall if there were coins up to $10 in regular circulation - you know, something you could actually pay a whole bar tab with.

  64. Deflation will fix the problem by maple_shaft · · Score: 0

    Or how about everytime our corrupt crony capitalists screw up the world economy, our placating fascist government just stop printing endless amounts of cash to cover everybodies debts.

    The problem is we have too much money and not enough wealth. A penny could buy a piece of candy, our smallest division of our currency could buy what amounts to the most menial of items. Over the years inflation continues to get so bad that pennies pretty much only have value on an accountants books.

    Sure the economy will tank, but in the end things will adjust to where they are supposed to be because it was all a false economy anyway. Money doesn't create wealth, innovation and labor create wealth.

  65. Totally missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why stop at pennies and nickles? Thanks to Obama and Bush before him, along with generations of politicians who use the printing press to buy votes, *none* of our money is worth the paper it is printed on. None of it had a direct correlation with our productivity or our creation of wealth.

    We certainly won't have enough of it to buy gas this Summer, because one group of voters was chosen over another with regards to energy policy, but at least prices will be five dollars plus, along with 9/10th of a cent. We've certainly rounded up after measuring prices based upon non-existent currency before.

    In the mean time, we have guys who have made their fortunes trading curencies like they were actual products using their money to fund resentment and envy against those who earned their money through hard work and smart decisions - again, all about buying votes. The USA is becoming Venezuala very quickly.

    Worrying about the manufacturing costs of small currency in this environment is like worrying about a dripping faucet when a tsunami warning has been issued. You may now return to sticking your heads in the sand, I'm sure the powers from both parties in Washington will continue sticking theirs up their arses.

  66. Steel pennies by halfkoreanamerican · · Score: 1

    I don't know about everyone else, but if pennies are not >= 2.5% copper, and >= 50% zinc then I will not waste my energy bending over to pick them up. Do we not have standards anymore?!

  67. Why not round to 10c? by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

    1) Get rid of pennies, nickels, and quarters.
    2) Replace 50c coins with something nickel-sized. (dollar coins are already quarter-sized)
    3) Switch to a deci-dollar based system (e.g. $0.1)

    Voila, you have a coins of $0.1 (dime sized), $0.5 (nickel sized), $1.0 (quarter sized) where the coin size is proportional to value. And you just reduced the number of coins in half.

    1. Re:Why not round to 10c? by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      Oh...I forgot the best part...

      4) Profit! (for federal government)

    2. Re:Why not round to 10c? by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This would save a fortune for the government, as well as all the vendors (and banks) who accept (and therefore have to spend time sorting) coins.

      I'm on board; let's make it happen. :-)

  68. My 2 Cents! by na1led · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that having pennies around costs much more than they are worth. All the metal and processing used to make them, the human resources needed to handle them, the equipment used to count and store them, etc. etc. If you want to deposite a lot of pennies to the bank, you need to roll them up (another cost), and all that extra time. Pennies get lost, millions of pennies burried in the dirt or in couches. Seems like a big waste to me.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  69. 7 cent Nickel by the+monolith · · Score: 1

    There has been historic debate upon this subject...

    The nickel today is not what it was fifteen years ago. Do you know what this country needs today?A seven-cent nickel. Yessiree, we’ve been using the five-cent nickel in this country since 1492. Now that’s pretty near a hundred years’ daylight saving. Now, why not give the seven-cent nickel a chance? If that works out, next year we could have an eight-cent nickel. Think what that would mean. You could go to a newsstand, buy a three-cent newspaper and get the same nickel back again. One nickel carefully used would last a family a lifetime!

    Groucho Marx (film: Animal Crackers)

    Some many years ago, Britain adopted a decimilised currencey. It simplified things, yet there were hidden disadvantages: after the introduction of the new coinage (12 old pennies comprised a shilling, then became 5 New Pence) prices for goods were converted upward, and led to a one-off step in inflation. for example, something that sold for an old penny, coverted directly to 0.416666667 in New Pence would now be sold for a New half penny, which was 0.083333333 New pence increase - a small matter of 16% increase. If you were a scruffy schoolkid who dealt in exchange rates based on the 'Mars Bar' economic standard, things got tough!

    1. Re:7 cent Nickel by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When I first started handling money was just after decimalisation. A ha'penny would get you a small sweet like a blackjack.

      There was quite high inflation around that time, which was fuck all to do with decimalisation, despite what Mrs Brady types thought. They soon went to a penny each (via, IIRC some odd thing like 3 for tuppence).

      It's worth pointing out that for bigger items, which are often priced to be just under a round amount the effect would work the other way, i.e. £9.99 is less than 9 pounds 19 and elevenpence.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  70. heh.. pennies by Higgins_Boson · · Score: 1

    I can barely GIVE pennies away, and they are worried about making them cheaper.

    While I know they are "legal" currency and shops MUST take them, they often flat-out refuse to. It might be cheaper in the long run to just stop making them altogether and force these stores which refuse to take them to stop having prices where you NEED to pay with pennies. That way, they can't refuse to take them anymore.

  71. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by maple_shaft · · Score: 2

    You realize that it is a felony offense to do this? http://www.usmint.gov/consumer/18USC331.cfm

  72. *fingers in ears* *lalalalla* by watermark · · Score: 0

    The rest of the world is on metric, but we're on *lalalalalalal*

    The rest of the world got rid of their "penny", we *lalalalalla*

    The rest of the world signed the Kyoto Protocol, but we *alalallala*

    The rest of the world dislikes war, but we *alallala*

  73. cost = labor + materials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does the cost include labor or just materials? Perhaps labor costs could be reduced.

  74. (Canadian) Pennies rejected by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    When I visited So-Cal last year, I had a few Canadian pennies mixed in with my US currency. Every time one (and only one) slipped in when I paid cash, the store rejected it. In Canada we just don't care if an American penny, nickel or even dime slips in.

    It was all the more amusing because our dollar higher than the US at the time, so technically that penny was actually worth more.

  75. Why is it more telling by jamescford · · Score: 1

    that 3/4 of people would pick up a penny from the ground? I would pick up a piece of trash from the ground, but that doesn't mean I want trash.

  76. UTF-8??? by zidium · · Score: 1

    Funny! UTF-8 solved all these problems a decade ago.

    Let me test without the HTML entities... €

    If € and € look the same, then it's a user error and not a slashdot one.

    --
    Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
  77. One Word by PatSand · · Score: 1

    Plastic! Actually, some countries are using plastic for the larger currency in a bill form because it is more durable and harder to forge. Besides, wouldn't it be fun to have translucent coins in different colors for the denomination? Of course, breaking a penny or nickel might take on a new meaning...

    --
    Supreme Granter of Doctor of Obviology Letters ("A FIRM Command of the Obvious")
  78. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by fnj · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your memory is incorrect. I am sick of false fantasies of incredibly low gas prices in history. It never happened. There is this thing called inflation. Gas was not "almost free" in the 1970s. Adjusted to 2004 dollars, it varied between $1.73 and $2.28. The lowest adjusted price for gas EVER was $1.22 in 1998. That compares to the best adjusted price in the 1930s - $2.15 in 1931 - and the best adjusted price in the 1950s - $2.00 in 1952. In 2004 it had only risen to $1.89 from the 1998 low.

    OK, the chart stops in 2004, and the current adjusted value is probably around $3.90, but somehow I don't think twice the price is the difference between $2 and $3.90 is "nearly free" compared to agonizingly high.

    Ref: Historical Gas Prices, 1919–2004

  79. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    I would NOT pick one up off the ground, they're worthless little pieces of trash. I throw pennies the hell away -- that's right, in the trash bin. Yeah, it costs me a few million times the counter-inflationary "benefit" I acheive, but the rest of you benefit for free, and I benefit by NOT HAVING FUCKING PENNIES CLUTTERING UP MY GODDAMN LIFE. You can thank me by telling your congressman to GET RID OF THE MOTHERFUCKING PENNIES -- if you don't, I'll assume you're a miserly, penny-pinching (literally) asshole.

    I agree that pennies and nickels should be eliminated. (Also, $1 bills should be dropped, and $1 and $2 coins should be introduced that don't look or feel like quarters.)

    However, taking your valuable time to sort out pennies so you can throw them away IS idiotic. All of the current US coins are too small valued to bother carrying around. I just throw every coin I get into a jar when I get home.

    About once per year, I bring it into my credit union and dump it in their convenient coin sorting machine, pennies and all, and in seconds it spits out a receipt I can deposit like a check. This way, I save time, and I'm not wasting valuable metals or costing the taxpayers the money it takes to replace the useless coins.

  80. In Italy... by havana9 · · Score: 1

    before the euro the italian lira had a low nominal value . 1 euro= 1936.27 lire, 1 US£ = about 1400 lire. The smallest mint coin was the 50 lire one and all purchases were rounded to the nearest 50 lire, but older coins, down under 1 lira were still legal tender and minted until the Euro switchover, but they were almost made for collector sets, but sometimes they were still found in the wild, especially in LPG and CNG pumps or cheese sellers in open air markets.

  81. Nickels Are Worth More Than a Nickel by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2

    http://coinflation.com/

    Bad money drives out the good.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  82. Digging them up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's worse for metal detectorists like myself - when these zinc disasters get into the ground for even a short period of time, they get chewed up and corroded, with literal chunks of the coin just gone. If it gets dropped, it better be found soon or it'll dissolve in the soil. Can't get much cheaper metal than that.

    It's a prize to dig up a pre-82 cent, rather than a junk "Zincoln" cent.....

  83. Pathetic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sad that the federal gov't has debased US currency to the point that Zinc (in pennies) is too expensive. Perhaps instead of changing the metals in US coins, that the gov't should enact policies to stop the US dollar from becoming worthless. Using Cheaper metals won't matter if the dollar continues to devalue because in a few more years even the cheaper metals will become too expensive.

    Bernanke said earlier this week that he was to devalue the dollar by 1/3 over then next five to six years. That means the even the cheaper metals will be too expensive to mint.

  84. Only the government by p51d007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could produce something, that is worth LESS than the cost to MANUFACTURE it!

    1. Re:Only the government by JazzHarper · · Score: 1

      Pennies are worth less than nothing. They have negative value. Pennies cost the US economy almost $1 billion annually in lost productivity, due to the time wasted fiddling around with them. Making them out of cheaper material will not solve that problem.

  85. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a trash can next to the coke machine at work. I burn off all my real change there (the machine won't even take pennies, for obvious reasons) in that, as I drink more soda than my average daily change received. No wasting valuable time -- grab the change out of my pocket, cram the silver in, and when I run out of silver (and start feeding it dollars), that last grab of change is now all pennies, ready for chucking!

    Dumping it in a jar, as you suggest, isn't any more work than what I do, but it isn't really any less -- and the pennies are only a small fraction of the value, so I don't lose much that way. And I get the satisfaction of inflation-fighting and sticking it to the man and indulging in my HATRED OF STUPID PENNIES, which makes me feel (irrationally) good.

  86. Cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reading these comments, it's incredible how many of you actually use cash. I haven't touched cash in a decade. Charge the shit to a rewards card and pay it off each month. Wife gets to get some garbage out of a catalog every few months for what she perceives as free (cashes in rewards points). Pay all bills electronically. I write like one check a year, and that's for some service that won't take a credit card.

    This makes budgeting and spending control a hell of a lot easier and I never deal with cash, pennies, etc. Privacy is not a concern, as I only purchase staple items and shit from the hydro store (we're thrifty).

  87. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales or lightens any of the coins ...

    Well, I don't think I'm actually doing any of those things, as they all refer to modifying the coin, not placing it in the trash. Could be wrong of course, IANAL, and I'm sure all those terms are defined somewhere I'm too lazy to look up.

    But I do know I'm not doing any of them fraudulently, so, no, I don't realize it's a felony, and if you read what you linked, you wouldn't "realize" it either.

  88. When Can We Sell Our Pennies As Copper? by assertation · · Score: 1

    I have a half gallon glass jar I have been filling with pennies since the 90s. It is almost full. I'm sure there are a few pre-1982 copper pennies in there. It is my money. I think the government should let me sell those pennies for copper.

    1. Re:When Can We Sell Our Pennies As Copper? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I would love to do that. I still like using cash and have probably 1.5 gallons of real copper pennies, the rest of my change goes off to the bank each year on my birthday and I get my self something that I want that is just an indulgence (last year it was a bottle of Hennessy XO).

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:When Can We Sell Our Pennies As Copper? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You may own the fa ce value they represent, but that doesn't mean you own the physical tokens used to carry it.

      Also:
      "Defacement of currency is a violation of Title 18, Section 333 of the United States Code. Under this provision, currency defacement is generally defined as follows: Whoever mutilates, cuts, disfigures, perforates, unites or cements together, or does any other thing to any bank bill, draft, note, or other evidence of debt issued by any national banking association, Federal Reserve Bank, or Federal Reserve System, with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued, shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both. "

      I reckon melting them down would make them "unfit to be reissued", no?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  89. What about hard currency at all? by assertation · · Score: 1

    The final SD thread, coming in our lifetimes, will be about the debate to get rid of hard currency altogether as most transactions will be electronic.

  90. sOCialism! Hitler! by assertation · · Score: 1

    Given the way a number of my Republican friends reacted to the laws to get rid of incandescent light bulbs ( portable heaters ), I'm surprised there aren't TEA party rallies comparing President Obama to Hitler for this move along with discussions of how to prepare for the invasion of black UN helicopters.

  91. Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by assertation · · Score: 3, Informative

    A number of people outside of the United States have been mentioning that their countries got rid of their equivalent of the penny years ago.......and the world didn't come to an end.

    Still......

    I remember a number of years ago, there was a true story about a programmer who wrote some kind of banking software. He did something such that he got a fraction of a penny on every transaction that went through the bank, deposited into a secret account.

    After a few years he was quite wealthy and the only reason he got caught was he couldn't suppress his desire to brag.

    Lesson learned: even little amounts add up.

    How would people feel if they were told that because of rounding up to a nickle, they could have had an extra $100, $10 etc at the end of the year, 5 years, etc?

    How would they feel knowing that they made a "donation" to corporate America of several thousand dollars over the course of their life time, for which those companies gave them *nothing*?

    1. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by Archon-X · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rounding works both ways, you know.

    2. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by N1AK · · Score: 2

      It costs the government more than 2.5x the cost of the penny to make and distribute it at the moment. Even if you ignore any of the other benefits of losing it, and you ignore that rounding in countries that do this normally works to nearest value not one above, the saving to the government budget would more than justify the change (either via more spending or less tax).

    3. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm not mistaken, the steal the fraction of a penny thing was how Richard Pryor's character made millions in Superman 3. He was only caught because he came to work in a Ferrari. "Art" imitating life, or life imitating "art"?

    4. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would people feel if told that because of the rounding *down* to a nickel that goes with all the rounding *up* to a nickel, they have exactly the same amount of money as if everything had been done out to the penny?

      Or, if they really carefully plan their purchases to come out to $0.06 and just pay the $0.05, they come out ahead?

      We already round things to the nearest penny. Rounding them to a larger unit won't change the totals. It changes the base unit and makes the measurement coarser, but it's not going to cost an individual anything in the long run.

    5. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by Kozz · · Score: 1
      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    6. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by assertation · · Score: 1

      Cool.

    7. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by FrootLoops · · Score: 2

      You described the plot of Office Space and Superman III. It's a practice apparently known as "salami slicing" or "penny shaving". In real life I imagine the rounding mostly evens out. You'd have eg. $0.99 going to $1, though on multiple-item purchases the last digit would be approximately random.

    8. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would ONLY apply if you're only rounding up. $1.51? Round that up to $1.60!

      I'm sure corporations would love the shit out of that, but I think the only way it'd be capable of getting passed is if it were... y'know... rounded off by rounding it up or down as is mathematically done.

    9. Re:Why rounding up to a nickel may SUCK. by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was strange for the first year. Many shops set their prices to the nearest 5c .. but then had problems at the till because fruit and veg and discounts meant that it the bill was rarely divisible by 5.

      After a while, the prices all went back to normal, and the world continued on.

      The only difference is that when you have a poker night now you use 5c and 10c pieces instead of 1c and 2c pieces.

      Many people use credit card to pay so there is no difference - as there is no change. For those that pay with cash your change is rounded up or down.

      --
      You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  92. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    In 1972, prices that mattered _to me_:

    Can of soda from a vending machine: $0.25

    Portable cassette recorder: $40

    500 mile car trip (gas cost only) 25 gallons at $0.36/gallon -> $9

    Yes, there has been inflation, but it was not unreasonable for an 8 year old to carry around a $10 bill in 1972... what would you think of an 8 year old carrying around $100 today?

  93. Whoosh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolling, or don't you understand the difference between arbitrage and counterfeiting?

  94. I-131 The perfect coin by An+dochasac · · Score: 3, Funny
    Aluminum, plastic and paper pennies might sound like good ideas now, but all are based on resources which are likely to become more valuable in time. What we need is a penny made out of Nuclear waste, specifically the Iodine-131 isotope. Here's why:
    • It quite literally 'burns a hole in your pocket' and so would stimulate spending.
    • It would discourage hoarding (you don't want to keep gamma emitters under your mattress)
    • It would encourage billionaires to quickly spread their wealth amongst the peons.
    • Since I-131 has an 8 day half-life, the Fed can keep printing it and giving it to banks and billionaires but by time it trickles down to you or me it will have disappeared!

    It is the perfect coin for the economy we've been working towards! Come on Obama, make it so!

    P.S. The U.S. and E.U. are in a head to head battle for who can print money the fastest, but I predict that China will win this race to the bottom. I have 2 beautifully designed paper Yuan notes, each worth 0.2 cents. Beat that Mr. Bernanke!

  95. Making Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's Moist von Lipwig when you need him? :)

  96. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't be the biggest stretch in the world for a lawyer to equate willfully disposing of currency in the garbage where it will be buried hundreds of feet below ground for tens of thousands of years as equivalent to willful destruction or mutilation.

    Hell, if they can get OJ off for murder then this isn't so far fetched.

  97. Why not just go digital? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should get rid of all tangible bills and coins and simply go digital. Most of us rely on our debit/credit cards as it is anyways. Let's just make it official. Think how much money we'd save if we didn't have to mint or print anything at all.

  98. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA SUCKERS! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    You haven't switched over to electronic or camera toll collection yet?!!!
    savages...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:HAHAHAHAHAHAHA SUCKERS! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But not everyone is a regular. So those out of towners get stuck with the extra ten cent charge, and won't stick around to complain about it during the next election :-)

  99. Or perhaps cheaper Trillion dollar bills. by goffster · · Score: 1

    why bother with pennies

  100. have you seen my green kryptonite ? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    If you do financial math with floating point numbers, you need to step away from the keyboard and let professionals do the programming.

    Sounds like those people learned to program from a school advertizing on the back of a matchbook. You need to watch out for that, or Richard Pryor will come to your office and smash your laser printer with a baseball bat.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  101. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Entropius · · Score: 1

    Not according to that. The law says that it is a crime if anyone "fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales or lightens" coins.

    You're not doing it for purposes of fraud, and really -- you're not doing any of those things. You're throwing it in the bin. It's still the same goddamn penny, and hasn't been altered, defaced, mutilated, impaired, diminished, falsified, scaled, or lightened in any way. It's just in the bin.

  102. plastic coins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why Govt. can't pring plastic money, at least in this scenario.

    and use some encryption too.

    should be recyclable.

    am trying myself to be more original.

  103. The problem isn't rounding, it's manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easiest solution, of course is to outsource!

    I'm sure there's a manufacturer in China that could make them cheaper!

  104. Return your old ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like it would be cheaper to have a campaign to return all the pennies in my couch, under the dryer, and on my closet floor into circulation, than make new ones. You know the banks are not using them for transactions, it is solely for the purpose of circulation. Why not spend $10M on a national campaign: "Recirculate your Pennies..and help balance the budget".

  105. Inflation by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    This is all while government is trying to pretend there is no inflation, while inflation has been rampant at 11-15% for the last 2 decades, which means that real rate of return on bonds and stocks is negative and it means that real GDP is shrinking all the time (and whatever goes into GDP is spending anyway), so the taxes as percentage of GDP are at historic high, and while Obama is yelling that "the rich aren't paying their fair share", Geithner says "It's good that the rich are paying 97% of all INCOME taxes and the bottom 97% only pay 3% of total income tax".

    Yeah, "there is no inflation" and jobs are leaving because of "evil rich people", not because of government destroying the money. And wars are all about "freedom" and have nothing to do with the only real industry that US is still engaged in.

  106. Pennies Shemennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the billions of 'collectable' quarters the mint keeps on printing, no one is collecting and they end up sitting in vaults... Nothing but junk metal anyway.

    1. Re:Pennies Shemennies by splatter · · Score: 1

      So 15 sec ago.. They stopped pressing these months back, but thanks for playing!

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    2. Re:Pennies Shemennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I would like to collect some of them, but I keep getting old ones and I don't use cash much anyway. The presidential dollar coins on the other hand, those were just an admission that nobody wanted to use them as actual money.

  107. Pennies are insignificant due to inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Preview Comment

            *
                Pennies are no longer significant. (Score:?)
                by Anonymous Coward writes: on Friday February 17, @11:15AM

                For years I have been a proponent of either eliminating pennies and nickels and rounding or just come out with a new system of currency that does not have pennies and nickels - and force the rounding to the value of dimes or quarters in today's currency. Back in the 19th century they did this all the time - with inflation, the current coinage is largely meaningless at the lower values.

                Believe it or not, no one dares to eliminate the penny because Abraham Lincoln is on it and Illinois would vote against anyone who proposes dropping the coin honoring their favorite son (hey, right, let's let Obama do this and tick off even more of the electorate).

                It would make cents (sorry) SENSE to create a currency of neo-dollars worth exactly 10 times the value of the current paper and coinage. The design of the neo-currency would be so different that it would be very hard to mix up old and new. We would run with both currencies for 2 years - to get enough of the neo-buck/coins in circulation and let the vending companies adapt. Then we would stop making the old currency/coins. We would make the designs of the neo-currency/coins based upon the same historical figures as the old - so no one or no group would lose the honor to their favorite sons (daughters, etc.) At the end of 5 years, the rest of the old currency/coinage would likely be in the hands of collectors - conversion done.

  108. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, there has been inflation, but it was not unreasonable for an 8 year old to carry around a $10 bill in 1972... what would you think of an 8 year old carrying around $100 today?

    That depends, can he spare a few dollars for gas? Adjusting for inflation is a tricky thing because prices fluctuate differently. Prices on a lot of the modern equivalents of what I bought when I was 8 haven't changed much at all. $50 (the inflation-adjusted $10 from 1972) is essentially the upper limit for toys these days, so I suppose the proper thought when encountering a kid with $50 is "lucky bastard." I certainly didn't have the inflation-adjusted equivalent of that 1972 $10 in my wallet very often when I was a kid,

  109. Re:Pick up a penny, of course! by gorzek · · Score: 1

    Indeed, Bitcoins aren't as far off other currencies as its proponents think. Bitcoins represent an amount of work done within the Bitcoin network (given that they are "minted" that way), while fiat currency essentially represents an amount of labor done to acquire it. You sell your labor to get money--with Bitcoin, you are "selling" your computer's labor. (A gross oversimplification, but I think it's interesting.)

  110. Re:$0.95 bullshit by oji-sama · · Score: 1

    If suddenly there were no pennies the entire world would play the Office Space Game of "which way can I pocket the difference to my own benefit."

    In Finland we don't have the 1 and 2 cent coins in use. (The made some, basically for collectors, when we started to use Euros though.)

    If you pay by card (credit or debit), the price will be the sum of the price tags of the products you've collected (and the amount of taxes can be seen on the receipt), if you pay in cash, the sum will be rounded to the nearest .05. There's really nothing to pocket.

    --
    It is what it is.
  111. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I like how you both deposit them for cash and call them useless.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  112. Oregon and Delaware too. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    What I see on the sticker is what I pay.

    Items with tax - mainly fuel, cigarettes and alcoholic beverages - are priced including tax, same as Oregon.

  113. Gold Standard by JWW · · Score: 2

    We should use this as an opportunity.

    Forget going backed to the gold standard for money, we should have all our money backed by pennies, with them being twice the cost of their face value, we'd double the value of everyone's money overnight!!!

  114. Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More telling, 76 percent of respondents said they would pick up a penny if they saw it on the ground.

    Would they still pick it up if they didn't see it on the ground? That's the important point ;)

  115. Too Little by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    What should happen, instead of these insignificant tweaks, is to eliminate making pennies altogether, as well as paper $1 bills. It's ridiculous to continue the waste associated with create paper $1 notes, that have such sort lifespans. They're only worth about 4 cents compared to the value of the dollar when the Federal Reserve was created. Make $1 coins instead. When all the paper runs out, people will have no choice but to use the coins, and save the treasury (and the taxpayer) about $300 million a year.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  116. Fun in chemistry class... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I remember in high school chemistry we took a penny and filed off one edge to get to the zinc. We then submerged the penny in HCL so we ended up with a hollow penny.

    I wonder if that experiment would still work with the new pennys/nickles.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  117. So... by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... let me get this strait, in order to save $100 million our government can either:
    A. Build 1 less tank/fighter jet
    B. The president could stop using his own private Jet
    C. We could delay invading Syria / Iran (whomever's next) by about 4hrs
    D. Completely overturn the way our currency has functioned for over 200 years.

    and we're choosing D?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course... You are new here aren't you? LOL

    2. Re:So... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      So... let me get this strait, in order to save $100 million our government can either: A. Build 1 less tank/fighter jet B. The president could stop using his own private Jet C. We could delay invading Syria / Iran (whomever's next) by about 4hrs D. Completely overturn the way our currency has functioned for over 200 years. and we're choosing D?

      For the same reason that most Americans appear to believe that their current political system *really works* - and by that I mean "really works for the BEST (not just the good) of the people".

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    3. Re:So... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Yea, you're barking up the wrong tree there. The idea that our Government is "Succeeding" at helping some, privileged group at the expense of all us other poor souls is just foolish. Our government is bad for everyone it touches, including those not even in it's jurisdiction. We subsidies our farmers by buying their grain, which drives them to rent land, strip it of it's natural habitat, turn it into barren cropland, just so they can NOT plant and collect the subsidy. (I actually had a farmer leasing land from me for a while until I found out what he was doing) Then we take that grain via Navy destroyer (it cost more in fuel to get it there than if we just bought everyone steaks on the island itself) to a country like Hattie, drive it to the center of town in $3mil transport trucks and hand it out for free... in turn driving all of the existing small grain distribution businesses bankrupt, attracting the poor that had been living in the countryside into town, creating tent cities and concentrating poverty and illness at the epicenter of where the most infrastructure was damaged. We've spent billions of dollars, grown LESS food, destroyed MORE wilderness, made poverty WORSE, and no one, anywhere, is better off. If we cut the subside, we're hurting the farmer at the expense of tax-breaks for the rich. If we burn the grain, we're hurting the poor people of Hattie. It's lose lose lose. The ONLY solution is to strip the government of the power to be involved in anything of this sort. Our government should not be subsidizing ANY industry. Oil, farming, finance. Our government should not be involved in ANY charity. If we want to help people after a disaster, WE should do it. Not out elected officials. The money our government mints should actually be worth what it's minted as. Why should the government profit off of stamping steel pennies? The government should never profit. Once the government doesn't have the ability to spend our money on such ridiculous endeavors, maybe they'll start taking a little less of it.

  118. "Obama" didn't do anything. by stereoroid · · Score: 1

    I'm not from the USA, so I find it bemusing how everything your Federal government does gets labeled "Obama's". Do you really think the President sits there in the Oval Office, micromanaging every single aspect of the Federal government's operations? You even keep his label on things that might have started with him, but ended up far away e.g. "Obamacare" is a long way away from the "single payer" reforms he wanted: the bill that passed Congress was seriously compromised by partisan interests, and he's getting blamed for the effects of changes he had nothing to do with and fought against unsuccessfully.

    From outside the USA, you have to wonder why anyone wants the job in the first place: you need to be a starry-eyed idealist, who's seen too many episodes of "The West Wing", or a raving theocrat who wants to overturn the Bill of Rights, to think you'll get anything done in 4-year timeslots ...

    --
    (this is not a .sig)
  119. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    I meant they are useless to carry around. When was the last time you dug coins out of your pocket to pay for anything? Even vending most vending machine purchases are simpler to do with the bill reader.

    Of course, they could choose to make coins useful again if they updated the US currency as I suggested so the values correspond with historic usage (i.e., you should be able to buy a beer with one or two coins, and the smallest coin should be able to buy at least one of *something*).

  120. Re:$0.95 bullshit by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    Actually dimes are the least useful of the common change denominations.
    5 pennies to a nickel
    5 nickels to a quarter
    4 quarters to a dollar.

    Just eliminate the dime all together. That should save more than making pennies and nickels cheaper.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  121. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by schlachter · · Score: 1

    In 2003/2004 in Georgia, USA....I was paying $.89/gallon for my gas.

    Salaries have been largely stagnant since then...so as a percent of my pay, it was much much less.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  122. coins to buy a coke by schlachter · · Score: 1

    When I have to have a whole fucking fist full of nickles, dimes, and quarters just to buy a $1.50 coke and a $1.00 snack from the vending machines at work, and they don't even take pennies at all....I know something is wrong with our currency.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  123. more value as projectiles by schlachter · · Score: 1

    Pennies have more value as projectiles than they do as currency.

    I always leave my pennies at the register when I get them.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  124. Why not just knock a zero off the currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather we just knock a zero off the currency. The logistics are more complex for some people, less complex for others. In the long run though we will have to do it. After steel you get plastic and at some point there is a fixed cost for putting any object in somebody's hand. The smallest denomination will always die unless you knock off a zero once in a while.

    On "zero day", all paper money is 1/10th the previous value, but all prices are 1/10th what they were. Your financial institution would knock the last digit off your account. The accumulated pennies from this operation would be paid as a special tax to help fund the transition.

  125. Questions about the gold standard (non-rhetorcal) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a serious question, for those who support a return to gold, regarding how such a thing would work in practice. Let's say we switched back to the gold standard. Wouldn't this mean that the federal government would be required to acquire (if they don't currently have it) enough gold to cover the value of all currency presently in circulation? Or alternatively, would the value of the dollars in our bank accounts be reduced to their proportion of the Federal government's actual gold reserve? And wouldn't either case result in a massive spike in the market price of gold?

    Maybe the answers to these questions are obvious, but I'm not an economist and I haven't really studied up on the gold standard. It's an interesting concept, but the switch from it seems much simpler than the switch back to it. And the advocates never seem to go into detail about how exactly you convert a fiat currency into a gold-backed currency.

  126. Euro cent coins are steel by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    as are 2 & 5.

    Why even bother producing coins that are worth more as a material than as a coin?

    Well it used to be the material that mattered. You were exchanging N grams of copper, or silver or gold. The British pound used to be a unit of weight of silver. Course the government needs to inflate away it's overspending, renege on it's debts, spend on political promises, make war etc so they changed the meaning of the word so they can reduce the value you receive to effectively nothing.

    In 1964 gas for your car cost around 30c per gallon. 3 silver dimes. Today it costs about 3-4 dollars, a ten fold increase in the dollar price and about the melt value of ~2 silver dimes (cheaper production).

    I'll leave it to you figure out who the sucker is.

    --
    Deleted
  127. Do you remember the half-cent coin? by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2

    It's just what happens with inflation.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5UT04p5f7U

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  128. Watch "Death to Pennies" by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2
    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  129. Re:Questions about the gold standard (non-rhetorca by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    There's more than one version of the gold standard.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  130. Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About ten years ago I went on a tour through the US Mint in Denver, and I asked them how much it cost to make one penny. They told me it cost 0.13 Cents for every 1.00 cents.

    Either Obama is wrong, or the price to make them have gone up so much that our economy is far worse off than the Obama administration has indicated.

    You decide.

  131. I use dollar coins by nido · · Score: 0

    The bank tellers like me, because I take them out of their drawers, and they don't have to count them at the end of the day.

    The thing is that dollar bills are borrowed from Wall Street, while dollar coins are government-issued money. I don't think JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America should be trusted to make the economy's money supply, so I try to always carry a few government-issued dollars with me.

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  132. I've been consistent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some time now, I've had a consistent opinion on what we should do with our currency:

    - Coins: penny, nickel, dime, quarter, $1
    - Bills: $5, $10, $20, $50, $100
    - If the penny or nickel cannot be minted for below their own face value, they should be discontinued. Stop letting the copper and zinc industries micromanage the mint, and let the mint use steel if it'll do the trick.
    - All existing currency, even if discontinued, should remain legal tender forever.
    - If the penny is eliminated, round final prices to the nearest $0.05. If the nickel is also eliminated, $0.10. I have yet to decide how to round ties.
    - Pricing can still be as granular as you want. Gas can still cost $3.599, and roaming in Canada can still cost $0.002/kB (or $0.00002/kB).

    Notice the elimination of the $1 bill. This puts us on par with other currencies (CAD and EUR come to mind), make life easier in general, and will knock hundreds of dollars off the cost of vending machines and mass-transit fareboxes that will no longer need bill readers.

    Also notice the elimination of the $0.50 coin and $2 bill. These are novelties, and I see no point in minting novelties as serious currency.

    Plus, the complete replacement of the $1 bill with a $1 coin will change two typical American mindsets, which are:

    - It's rude to leave coins for tips, even if they're $1 coins. Although I don't subscribe to this thought (cash is cash), I'll admit that it was a bit weird in Europe to leave a single coin as a tip.

    - Cents and dollars are two distinct units. Coins are cents, and bills are dollars.

    Perhaps eventually, we might even have Verizon customer service reps who don't quote a price in cents when they mean dollars.

  133. Stop devaluing the currency! by stanjo74 · · Score: 1

    Instead, can we just stop purposely devaluing our currency, so that the value of the "money" is higher than the cost to manufacture the token?

  134. Re:$0.95 bullshit by steelfood · · Score: 1

    You can argue that even for pennies. Money is usually calculated to 4 decimal places. Going up to the dime level just means shifting everything so that it's only calculated to 3 decimal places.

    Might as well make the dime the new penny. If the cost of manufacturing the penny and the nickle are more than the face value of the coin, then there's a problem. At that point, you might as well treat it like a metal-backed currency.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  135. 76% said they pick up pennies off the ground... by Nyder · · Score: 1

    ... only goes to show how fucked up our economy is.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  136. Nay sayers by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    So for all those that said Obama has done nothing while in office I say [sarcasm]IN YOUR FACE.[/sarcasm]

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  137. Re:The Price Is Right by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    You're talking about a development from a time when sales tax didn't exist (or wasn't collected). There was a reason, but that is not the reason now.

    Now, it is well-accepted that the "primacy effect" means that a $5.99 price will be mentally converted to "$5" and seen as cheaper. Most of this seems to be philosophical arguments rather than good hard science, but I'll leave that.

    Although networkBoy mentions alternate reasons, these are usually store-specific, and still keep the price within a few pennies of the next dollar up. Walmart typically ends prices in .88 or .87 for the same reason, IIRC. The psychology there is two-fold. One, a $19.99 item is cheap at the Walmart price of $19.88. Two, for customers who don't really think about it, it is very easy to make people think $4.88 is better than $3.99 because it was "4 dollars or so" and Walmart is 11 cents less. There is an entire game show, "The Price Is Right", based on the idea that people don't know how much normal products typically cost (whevever they survey the prices, which tyically is not where the contestant lives).

    They are still counting on getting as close to the next dollar without going over, no matter the reasons, due to the business schools teaching primacy.

  138. Wrong: A bit trickier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is, debasing coinage has one purpose: making more. This is just as true in this case, because it will reduce the cost of minting coins.
    If you have more coins, you nominally have more money.
    If you have more nominal money, and total resources stay ~constant, then you have inflation.
    Thus, debasing coinage will result in inflation.

    If inflation occurs, the point stands.

  139. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    Why shouldn't our smaller units of currency be converted to paper to reflect this situation and keep costs down

    It isn't clear that paper money is cheaper overall than coins. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banknote#Advantages_and_disadvantages

  140. Re:$0.95 bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well for the record I set my clock an hour and 45 minutes ahead so that I am on time! : )

    Pssh, that's nothing! I set my clock 24 hours ahead so that I am on time.

  141. The obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is to scale down the price of everything by 80%.

  142. Physical Currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just eliminate physical currency all together. I haven't even seen pennies and nickels in some time.

  143. Misconception that AoC were useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a country where money is made by the government through tax overhead instead of actually regulating the activities officiated to them, explain to me why the Club of government workers can leave their place of employment to create another government in an empty back-room to do otherwise clandestine activities in front of all the people and pretend those clandestine activities are not clandestine?

    Burn it all down.

  144. or maybe, just maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we drop the penny altogether

  145. Congress has power to Compete. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A competitor in a foreign jurisdiction.

    That's why the District of Columbia is not like the State(s) in the Declaration of Independence. Congress is a catch-all in a foreign country. Rather than create a corporation for every activity, it just gets pushed to Congress.

    The bigger question is why the States should give a damn about what Congress can or can't do that they all push their problems to Congress instead of creating a corporation to strategize over their problems.

    For me, Californians having problems shouldn't make them go to Mexico, but that is what happens when Congress gets involved. It's as though whomever in the States is ignoring the natural order to prefer Congress do their work, as though the States are head by diaspora Congress people instead of nationals.

    So my final question: Is the State or are the States all titles of nobilities created by Congress or a local bank? Surely, when Congress gets work then it should go through all means of Commerce to work towards the State(s) such as the Secretary of State, but we aren't seeing that anywhere here: it's as though the State(s) working with Congress are actually created parallel in the District of Columbia and overlaid upon the nations like a blanket to absence nationals' republic statehood and beshmirk the people with a hornswaggle from US Code Title 4. Then of'course, the people each have been forced a birth certificate upon them that was enumerated through the Treasury onto bond paper and is held by the Depository & Trust Company where is adhese through all kinds of financial schemes (Social Security, FICA, et al) as though it's a domestic instrument of the District of Columbia attaching foreign goods of a foreigner (you) of a nation-state to Congress accounts.

    That's not government. That's franchise.

  146. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see how it is a felony to do this. He's throwing them away, not trying to "alter, ...." them, especially fraudulently.

    If you want to throw legal tender in the trash, I don't see how it's illegal at all. Not necessarily bright, but not illegal.

  147. Even better, go decimal by tarsiermiller · · Score: 0

    Eliminate the 1-, 5-, and 25-cent coins. Re-introduce the double dime ($0.20). Round transaction total after taxes to the nearest $0.10. While you're at it, eliminate the dollar bill and get the billions of Sacagawea and US President dollars out of expensive government storage and into circulation. The life span of a dollar bill in circulation is about 18 months, compared to about 20 years for coins. Cost/year is greatly reduced.

  148. I'm not a Ron Paul supporter by bored · · Score: 1

    But, its telling if the smaller denominations cannot be produced effectively because the base metals are to expensive. Worse yet is the raw manufacturing cost is almost 1/2...

    On the positive side, no one will counterfeit something that is worth less than the materials used to make it.

  149. No, it's not by Goonie · · Score: 1
    It's an artifact of moderate inflation accumulating over a very long span of time without a rebasing of the currency.

    If you really want valuable pennies, pass a law that says the official tender of the United States is changing to the "New Dollar" (or, to get the GOP on side, "the Reagan") and that the Federal Reserve will exchange 1 US dollar for a 1/100 of a Reagan.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  150. Time to replace them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whee! Another end the penny thread. But why stop there? US currency needs a total makeover. Here's what I'd do if I was in charge.

    End the penny, nickel, and quarter. Keep the dime and the 50 cent piece. I would change the size of the 50 cent piece to be more like that of the penny or nickel (maybe use reeded edges to distinguish it from the old money). Next, get rid of the $1 and $5 bill and replace them with coins. Make them larger, like the current quarter and 50 cent piece, but again distinguish them from the old money somehow. Finally, get rid of the $20, and add a new $500 bill. Oh, and make the bills different sizes and colors (like they do in Australia).

    Advantages:
    Cost to produce the coins and bills is more in line with value of materials.
    Value of coins and bills now reflects the reality of inflation (i.e. you don't need a bag of change to buy something in a vending machine or a wad of bills for your weekly groceries).
    Uses the same number of slots in cash drawers as the current system.
    Value is obvious, both visually and non-visually; less value = smaller.

    Disadvantages: it's different so people will hate it.
    *sigh*

  151. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not really my concern, but, looking at the "value" of gold from 1975 to the present, I'd rather keep my savings in an imaginary construct like the U.S. dollar invested in a mix of index funds and bond issues

    Yeah a lot of people think bonds are great now. They are going to get their asses handed to them through when interest rates rise. The same moronic mistakes are being made today as they were during the housing bubble. Houses won't drop in values right? Just like interest rates will never rise.

  152. The Penny is not going to change. Here's why: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The penny will continue to be made from copper plated pure zinc and here is why:
    1. The shadowy NY financial concern that owns the factory in Tennesse where the blanks are made makes over $1 million per month in pure profit from the penny.
    2. The Zinc Producer's of America makes a killing selling zinc for this. The price and demand for their product will be heavily damaged if the penny goes away.
    3. The factory that makes the blanks is protected by the Steel Worker's Union in an area where unemployment is 15-20% on average.

    So don't waste your breath.

  153. Re:You can't eliminate them - I disagree by geezer+nerd · · Score: 1

    I live in NZ, a country where tipping is very seldom done. The service is generally very bad because there is no incentive to do better. I am always happy to return to the US and dine where I am treated better.

    And on the coinage topic: NZ dropped the 1-cent coin maybe 12 years ago, and the 5-cent coin was dropped in 2006. Prices are NOT written in multiples of 10 cents. They are written as 4.99 or 12.34, or whatever. Tax is not an issue, although every price includes a national tax. Electronic transactions (credit or debit card) are charged the exact price. Rounding happens only when one pays cash, and then on the total amount, not each individual item. There are 2 or 3 approved rounding methods, and the store must publicly post which method they use.

    It all just works.

  154. Poor Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>So even if the service is NOT good, servers still expect a tip

    That's the biggest hunk of horse...crap... I've heard in a long time.
    If a server is having a bad day, well, they're human and it happens. You still have to perform your job like everyone else and I'll still leave a tip if you've done a barely adequate job.

    However, if service is poor because the server is slacking off, inattentive, rude, etc., then no, there will NOT be a tip, and I will be speaking with the restaurant manager. That server does not belong in the service industry, period.

  155. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    there is real value in tangible coins that paper and credit cards lack

    Sure but that value is NEGATIVE, or at the very least, less than the face-value of the coinage.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  156. thats funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats funny I was only going to have to pay an even flat two dollars for my coffee until you guys tacked on a .799999% tax

  157. Penny loafers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will I put in my penny loafers?

  158. plastic-co2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll make all of it out of plastic w/ a bladder to sequester carbon-dioxide. It won't be worth squat, but will cost $10 to make each. And, most importantly, it will create jobs.

  159. Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who pays cash anymore anyway? If it's a cash transaction, round it off and be done with it.

  160. Re:Pick up a penny, of course! by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Aren't they more of a pyramid scheme?
    The early adopters get a vast advantage over the new arrivals, but only so long as there's a constant stream of new arrivals to hold up the pyramid.
    The shiny interesting tech stuff is just a front to bring in the right sort of marks.

  161. damn... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    the gold bugs are out in force...

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  162. Gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vote Ron Paul, switch to Gold Bouillon!

  163. restart the currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think britain did this back in the 70s (doesnt matter if they did, i like it anyway, its my idea, so there)
    issue a series of new coins and bills, all named as such, each pegged at worth 5X what their namesake is worth
    new penny, valued at 5 cents, sized around a dime
    new nickel, valued at 25 cents, sized around a penny
    new dime, valued at 50 cents, sized around a nickel
    new half dollar, valued at $2.50, sized around a quarter
    new dollar (coin), valued at $5.00, sized around a dollar coin
    new 5 dollar bill, valued at $25
    new 10 dollar bill, valued at $50, longer than the 5
    new 50 dollar bill, valued at $250, longer than the 10
    the old currency would remain legal tender, forever. stores could still give out change down to 1 "cent"
    the quarter coin, and twenty dollar bill, would go bye bye, in place of a neat 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000 valuation (decimal and mid decimal values). dollar coin finally replaces the dollar bill. vending machine operators would have a gutwrenching adjustment, then could settle in for a hopefully long period of stability. if we reformulate the coins using the cheapest metals possible, we could save money with our money, as coins last longer than bills, so more of these denominations would pay for themselves faster. Anyway, bills are stupid, too easy to forge.

  164. Aluminum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had aluminum coins in my country 30 years ago. They were fun to play with, you could make them float on water.

  165. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact you think a car in 1972 could get 20 miles per gallon proves to me that you don't know what you're talking about. :P
    But really some things go up faster than inflation some go up slower. It just you don't have to buy most things every week and have giant signs posted on the side of the road like gas does.

  166. Get rid of the penny by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    Better yet round to the nearest dime on purchases. But all we really need is quarters.

    Doesn't even need to be a federal mandate. Simply stop producing them and if retailers can't get them they will be forced to round. The amount of time wasted on counting pennies is shocking.

    We should be able to get along fine on dimes and quarters.

  167. So, Goldbugs: what to do about hoarding? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    So, we go back to the Gold Standard. Rich families like the Waltons start taking large percentages of their annual profits and using them to buy gold. Each and every year.

    This distorts the value of your backed currency as it drives up their price of gold - and the value of the Richie Rich's stockpiles. Add that on top of already grotesque income disparity - the U.S. is worse than Egypt - and the rich will literally get richer as the poor get poorer.

  168. False Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So... let me get this strait, in order to save $100 million our government can either:

    You'd be better off getting your facts straight. Why are you making those choices exclusive, as though the government can only do one of them? Also, why do you think it worthwhile to spend $100M dollars of our money to avoid having to round to the nearest nickle when making change? Many other countries have done this and there were no giant disasters reported.

    Also, we've changed the way currency works quite a few times in the past 200 years. We eliminated 2 and 3 cent pieces ages ago, quite a few denominations of bills no longer exist, either, pennies have shrunk considerably since the introduction of the Indian head penny, we've stopped using silver & gold (except in certain proof sets), pennies have changed composition several times (first to steel for the war, later to zinc cores), etc. It's not as bad as you think.

  169. Eliminate Pennies Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pennies need to be eliminated ASAP. The average store clerk uses an electronic device to show monetary amounts. These devices can be upgraded or eventually replaced. I made the recommendation to eliminate pennies to Pres Clinton years ago; it is now even more imperative that we do so.

  170. paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When East Germany faced the same issue, for the same reason, the Communists there went with paper filled coins clad with a thin layer of aluminum foil.

    They were so worthless that western visitors set them out on window sills on the path to the train station since the Communists did not allow them to leave the country and there was little or nothing to buy with them.

  171. We'll make 'em up here! by doccus · · Score: 1

    Hey maybe they should subcontract their mint operations to us.. It only costs 1.8 Cents to make a penny in Canada..[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny_(Canadian_coin)] surely the Americans are doing something wrong if it cost them 2.4 cents..Anyways, seems theres a move afoot to make all of our coins out of steel (unknown source, likely the nightly news though).. Or, y'all doun south could do the "Fort Knox" thing and make em all out of gold painted wood...

  172. Re:The problem with actual value of theoretical mo by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    In 2003/2004 in Georgia, USA....I was paying $.89/gallon for my gas.

    And that's about what I paid in NJ in 1994 - I seem to recall .81 or .83 at some point. About a buck five in 2004 dollars.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  173. Re:$0.95 bullshit by toddestan · · Score: 1

    That's something a lot of the "eliminate the nickel" crowd seems to miss. You can't just eliminate the nickel because then the dime and quarter aren't compatible with each other. You can't make a quarter out of dimes alone, you need a nickel too (or 5 pennies I suppose).

  174. back to the gold standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well then I'll just take my one cent in .0000063 ounces of gold as the founding fathers would prefer.

  175. what this country needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a good one cent penny. Back to the copper standard!

  176. Re:Fighting inflation -- one penny at a time. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    I didn't see it in that list, but I have to ask...what the hell is utter in that context? How can you utter money?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?