My god. If I changed my.sig to "I'm inserting my virtual penis into your unwilling virtual vagina", would I become the worlds most prolific serial virtual rapist? That would be virtually awesome!
Thank you for making yourself sound special. You've by so doing removed yourself from the mass market which the largest seller of digital cameras in the world - Nokia - was targetting, and ensured that you are always part of the an elite minority which will do nothing to counter the claim that "we could start to see a decline in dedicated digital cameras sales and an increase in camera phone sales". Unfortunately that was the claim you were trying to counter by your argument. You didn't quite think it through enough, because like so many other DSLR owners you couldn't resist telling us how _huge_ your zoom lens is.
I'm aghast at how many people are making bold statements about "cameraphones do this", "DSLRs do that", etc. and almost none of them are actualy based on facts, most just on incorrect guesswork.
Ant Attack was one of the biggest wastes of time ever. And I mean that in the most positive way possible. Days, weeks, who knows how much time I spent playing that.
I was a speccy owner (original 48k, plus interface 1 & microdrives too), and in retrospect, the BBC model B was about 10 times better, and only 2.5 times the price. The basic was vastly better in almost very way, inline assembler too, more ports, vastly better graphics, incomparably better sound, and more expansion capability.
But I love my old speccy. Seeing my first self-generated full-screen mandelbrot after 27 hours of computation was something I will never forget!
Look at the colophon example:
http://blog.wired.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/u ncategorized/2007/04/17/lov.jpg which they insist has equal volumes of yellow between each letter. Then look at the 2nd and 3rd yellow areas - vastly different.
This reduces the credibility of the author to approximately zero.
Just be careful not to block utm.edu - the university of Tennessee at Martin! However, anything with 'click', 'track', or 'xch' in its URL seems to be bin-worthy.
That's one of the security levels, yes. 3rd level out of the 4, IIRC. Uses a challenge-response to verify the emulator connected to the JTAG is a valid one, so one can't even use a replay attack. It's probably the most sensible level to release hardware at.
In theory. Often, as this story seems to support, not all possible security is turned on.
I have just quit a gig at Freescale Semiconductor, and I can assure you that the security capabilities of their mobile platforms are absolutely spot on - you can nail absolutely *everything* down. However, if you want to debug models that have failed in the field, then you need to at ship them with the secure JTAG cranked down to a not-totally-disabled (by e-fuses, no way back) setting. For work at service centres, rather than at FSL's (customers') labs, you need to crank the security several notches. Too secure, and the thing turns into a paperweight if it ever fails.
Nonsense. For example Nokia let you hold Nokia hardware, with TI chipsets, in your hands. They do not want you breaking out of the sandbox that they've set up. If that's not physical access to the device I don't know what is, and there are a billion instances of that in the world.
Unlikely. I seem to remember heading off to yahoo's wap homepage a few months ago, and being greeted with nothing but relatively large logos, weighing in at about 160K/page.
You have to _chose_ to put large images on your website. It's always been easy to design sites which are lightweight, it's just that numbnutted people persistently chose not to. At least that's one thing that google still do right.
"Luria is acting very strangely, laughing while attempting to apprehend "Babyshoes"" "... large quantities of marijuana." "shooting the corpse in the head... seemingly to Foreman's amusement."
They've remade Reefer Madness, by the sound of it.
It's not a stretch at all to say it's been published. This thing has been published in every sane definition of the word. Publishing is about the making available of information to the public. That has been done.
It's not been reviewed by a suitable panel, that's all.
Your conflation of the two concepts would make me worry about your ability to critically review anything written in the English language.
If he claims to have tested it positively, but the situations under which it can be tested are so rare, he's set up a claim that can never be debunked.
He may as well say "god did it" if he's going to be that much of a cheat. He should just bite the bullet (nebula), and admit he's bullshitting us.
Yes, the mouseover stuff is shit. However, if you click UlteoOS, that becomes the top level section that you're part of, and the Screenshots 2nd level stays visible even when the mouse is off the menu.
Slashdot Mirror
My god. If I changed my .sig to "I'm inserting my virtual penis into your unwilling virtual vagina", would I become the worlds most prolific serial virtual rapist? That would be virtually awesome!
And if you refused to answer their questions, there would be virtual electrodes strapped to your virtual head, and, no, NO, NOT THE VIRTUAL PROBE!
Is pr0n a spectator sport now?
Let me rephrase for those with poor reading comprehension.
Your argument in no way countered the claim you were trying to counter.
Thank you for making yourself sound special. You've by so doing removed yourself from the mass market which the largest seller of digital cameras in the world - Nokia - was targetting, and ensured that you are always part of the an elite minority which will do nothing to counter the claim that "we could start to see a decline in dedicated digital cameras sales and an increase in camera phone sales". Unfortunately that was the claim you were trying to counter by your argument. You didn't quite think it through enough, because like so many other DSLR owners you couldn't resist telling us how _huge_ your zoom lens is.
Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT - 6x digital zoom.
I'm aghast at how many people are making bold statements about "cameraphones do this", "DSLRs do that", etc. and almost none of them are actualy based on facts, most just on incorrect guesswork.
"fine art"
He'll soon find out how true that description is.
Ant Attack was one of the biggest wastes of time ever. And I mean that in the most positive way possible.
Days, weeks, who knows how much time I spent playing that.
I was a speccy owner (original 48k, plus interface 1 & microdrives too), and in retrospect, the BBC model B was about 10 times better, and only 2.5 times the price. The basic was vastly better in almost very way, inline assembler too, more ports, vastly better graphics, incomparably better sound, and more expansion capability.
But I love my old speccy. Seeing my first self-generated full-screen mandelbrot after 27 hours of computation was something I will never forget!
But by that metric opera's doing well.
t +explorer%2C+opera&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all
http://www.google.com/trends?q=firefox%2C+interne
By any other metric it isn't doing particularly well, despite it being a fairly competant browser.
Unfortunately the article is codswallop.
u ncategorized/2007/04/17/lov.jpg
Look at the colophon example:
http://blog.wired.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/
which they insist has equal volumes of yellow between each letter.
Then look at the 2nd and 3rd yellow areas - vastly different.
This reduces the credibility of the author to approximately zero.
Ah, OK, I've not seen enough of those __utm* ones to notice the pattern. However, they do sound like they're worth rejecting. Thanks for the heads up.
Just be careful not to block utm.edu - the university of Tennessee at Martin!
However, anything with 'click', 'track', or 'xch' in its URL seems to be bin-worthy.
Nope, you need greasemonkey to block those.
Oooh, I wonder if greasemonkey was on the worse 10 list, he asked him knowingly.
That's one of the security levels, yes. 3rd level out of the 4, IIRC. Uses a challenge-response to verify the emulator connected to the JTAG is a valid one, so one can't even use a replay attack. It's probably the most sensible level to release hardware at.
In theory. Often, as this story seems to support, not all possible security is turned on.
I have just quit a gig at Freescale Semiconductor, and I can assure you that the security capabilities of their mobile platforms are absolutely spot on - you can nail absolutely *everything* down. However, if you want to debug models that have failed in the field, then you need to at ship them with the secure JTAG cranked down to a not-totally-disabled (by e-fuses, no way back) setting. For work at service centres, rather than at FSL's (customers') labs, you need to crank the security several notches. Too secure, and the thing turns into a paperweight if it ever fails.
If you didn't want your content to be 24" wide, why did you make the window in which you displayed that content 24" wide?
Join the computing elite - learn how to resize windows!
Nonsense. For example Nokia let you hold Nokia hardware, with TI chipsets, in your hands. They do not want you breaking out of the sandbox that they've set up. If that's not physical access to the device I don't know what is, and there are a billion instances of that in the world.
Unlikely. I seem to remember heading off to yahoo's wap homepage a few months ago, and being greeted with nothing but relatively large logos, weighing in at about 160K/page.
You have to _chose_ to put large images on your website. It's always been easy to design sites which are lightweight, it's just that numbnutted people persistently chose not to. At least that's one thing that google still do right.
FatPhil
"Luria is acting very strangely, laughing while attempting to apprehend "Babyshoes"" ... seemingly to Foreman's amusement."
"... large quantities of marijuana."
"shooting the corpse in the head
They've remade Reefer Madness, by the sound of it.
I never thought I'd see a half-life reference cascade, let alone create one.
Wrong.
It's a paper, even if it's a preprint.
It's been published, even if it's been published somewhere where anyone can publish stuff.
The concept you're missing is that of _review_ (and acceptance).
It's not a stretch at all to say it's been published. This thing has been published in every sane definition of the word. Publishing is about the making available of information to the public. That has been done.
It's not been reviewed by a suitable panel, that's all.
Your conflation of the two concepts would make me worry about your ability to critically review anything written in the English language.
If he claims to have tested it positively, but the situations under which it can be tested are so rare, he's set up a claim that can never be debunked.
He may as well say "god did it" if he's going to be that much of a cheat. He should just bite the bullet (nebula), and admit he's bullshitting us.
Yes, the mouseover stuff is shit. However, if you click UlteoOS, that becomes the top level section that you're part of, and the Screenshots 2nd level stays visible even when the mouse is off the menu.