No, the structure the facts are surrounded in is copyrightable.
Regarding what you find in cookbooks, copyright law does not protect recipes that are mere listings of ingredients. Copyright protection may, however, extend to substantial literary expression -- a description, explanation, or illustration, for example -- that accompanies a recipe or formula or to a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook.
Interviews are almost never just facts, interviews are expression.
If I were me, I'd add 2 characters to my current scheme, as my typical passwords are the <2^50 range:-(
Anyone not salting passwords should be shot. Salt can be worth 20 bits of security if you're not specifically targetted. (But maybe nothing if you are specifically targetted.)
Why just decent? Why not go for the best - Phil Spector's Gold Star Studios in LA.
Oh - because that was set up for a "wall of sound" with as much echo as possible rather than being anechoic.
In my voice-recording experience, isolation booths in radio studios are vaguely close to this, but nothing really compares to the absolute silence of test facilities I've seen, but not heard, in engineering companies.
Thanks to Russia and Poland, our herring's already all poisonous (dioxins, mercury, phosphorous,...) here in the Baltic. So the conclusions are obvious...... just dump the crap on Russia and Poland. I call this policy "Payback".
What's the keyword? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yum50ua_mc8 (The only result for "dilbert wally keyword" was a totally fucked up mess of snippets, don't watch. The snippet I was after is probably in part 3 of the above, I didn't have time to watch the whole episode to find it.)
No disagreement. I used to view them as harvesting noise. I now view them like Maxwell's Demon, mostly because this high speed trading permits them to open the valve more precisely.
""" "‘Public Place' means an enclosed area to which the public is invited... In other words, if you are allowed to walk into a place without an invitation, it's probably public. """
Erm, thanks for that wonderfully lucid explanation, that clears everything up.
And it's not even really "reacting to", as the anti-GG policy *predates* the attention-seeker's attention-seeking stunt. The stunt was a reaction to the policy, if anything.
"Starr had walked into an establishment owned by one of the more vocal anti-Glass restaurateurs".
It's clear provocation, with the expected result, in order to justify a pathetic look-at-poor-me, I'm being oppressed, whine.
"""... and discovered â€oean exponential relationship in the light on the white wall.†The brightness of any surface becomes exponentially less bright the farther it is from a light sourceâ€"but the unaided human eye doesnâ€(TM)t register that. """
False, and false. The eye compensates for the *inverse square law*, which is different from not registering it. Were it not to be followed, the eye would certainly notice something is wrong. So by accepting the gradation as not worthy of attention, the brain has noticed and approved it.
> As I said, the communist witch hunt was irrational
Yet you said:
> in the political context of the early 1950:s, fear of communism was not considered irrational.
rationality can only be defined in terms of context, so if it you're saying it wasn't irrational given that context, you're saying it wasn't irrational. Yet you're now saying it was irrational.
I think it is I who is failing to see what your point is.
That image really makes (at least some parts of) the US look like even worse wack-jobs than anything in the Bush+-era. I do actually know someone who was brainwashed by/in the 50s, and for whom "UNESCO" is a trigger word which will set her off on an ignorance-fuelled inane rant. (We live in a UNESCO world heritage site, so she probably wants to bomb us back to the middle ages.)
I often semi-jokingly say that John Major getting re-elected was a direct result of The Daily Mail too. (In particular the middle-aged femail^H^Hle demographic - if you look at voter turnout breakdown, it was the 40-something women that swung the results his way.)
Never underestimate the size, and influence, of the critical-thinking-free segment of the population.
The n900 (and n9) UI were hugely more inconsistent than the first Android (2.x family) device I used for a few weeks, although the subsequent Android (4.x family) device I used for a few months after that was not as consistent as the earlier one - apps had started to introduce their own "menu" buttons on screen in random places, and not have anything useful on the system "menu" button.
Spiral zoom in browser - great! Spiral zoom in image gallery - no chance! Volume zoom in pdf viewer - passable. Volume zoom in txt viewer - no chance! In fact no ability to zoom the text at all without converting it to html. And which apps rotate to portrait mode, and why do those that don't not rotate?
Disclaimer - I worked on the n900 and n9 (and the two devices between them, and the one after,...), and I filed *hundreds* of breainead UI inconsistency bugs against both. Depressingly large proportions were simply closed WONTFIX with the sole justification "behaves as specified". It was proven that the management of the UI team were telling lies about the results of UI studies that had been commissioned, in order to justify their crazy decisions.
Slashdot Mirror
You need a passport of something that's not a passport.
End of.
No, the structure the facts are surrounded in is copyrightable.
Regarding what you find in cookbooks, copyright law does not protect recipes that are mere listings of ingredients. Copyright protection may, however, extend to substantial literary expression -- a description, explanation, or illustration, for example -- that accompanies a recipe or formula or to a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook.
Interviews are almost never just facts, interviews are expression.
But not so proud you're prepared to identify yourself, anonymous coward.
Does the word "or" mean something different to you?
If you need A or B, then you do not need A if you have B. Here, A=passport.
? 9*log(62)/log(2)
:-(
53.58776679348187687925511239
I'd ad an extra character, if I were you.
If I were me, I'd add 2 characters to my current scheme, as my typical passwords are the <2^50 range
Anyone not salting passwords should be shot. Salt can be worth 20 bits of security if you're not specifically targetted. (But maybe nothing if you are specifically targetted.)
Why just decent? Why not go for the best - Phil Spector's Gold Star Studios in LA.
Oh - because that was set up for a "wall of sound" with as much echo as possible rather than being anechoic.
In my voice-recording experience, isolation booths in radio studios are vaguely close to this, but nothing really compares to the absolute silence of test facilities I've seen, but not heard, in engineering companies.
Thanks to Russia and Poland, our herring's already all poisonous (dioxins, mercury, phosphorous, ...) here in the Baltic. So the conclusions are obvious... ... just dump the crap on Russia and Poland. I call this policy "Payback".
> All you have to do is to head directly towards the object
YES!!!!!!!!!!
And that's the *hard* bit - you have to cancel *all* of our orbital speed, which is huge.
What's the keyword?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yum50ua_mc8
(The only result for "dilbert wally keyword" was a totally fucked up mess of snippets, don't watch. The snippet I was after is probably in part 3 of the above, I didn't have time to watch the whole episode to find it.)
There's only one sensible way to pick lottery numbers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN3GwyGTRXA
No disagreement. I used to view them as harvesting noise. I now view them like Maxwell's Demon, mostly because this high speed trading permits them to open the valve more precisely.
""" ...
"‘Public Place' means an enclosed area to which the public is invited
In other words, if you are allowed to walk into a place without an invitation, it's probably public.
"""
Erm, thanks for that wonderfully lucid explanation, that clears everything up.
And it's not even really "reacting to", as the anti-GG policy *predates* the attention-seeker's attention-seeking stunt. The stunt was a reaction to the policy, if anything.
"Starr had walked into an establishment owned by one of the more vocal anti-Glass restaurateurs".
It's clear provocation, with the expected result, in order to justify a pathetic look-at-poor-me, I'm being oppressed, whine.
""" ... and discovered â€oean exponential relationship in the light on the white wall.†The brightness of any surface becomes exponentially less bright the farther it is from a light sourceâ€"but the unaided human eye doesnâ€(TM)t register that.
"""
False, and false. The eye compensates for the *inverse square law*, which is different from not registering it. Were it not to be followed, the eye would certainly notice something is wrong. So by accepting the gradation as not worthy of attention, the brain has noticed and approved it.
> downloading your software should just come with a disclaimer, that it has not been audited and inspected
... come with (an offer of) source?
Or
> As I said, the communist witch hunt was irrational
Yet you said:
> in the political context of the early 1950:s, fear of communism was not considered irrational.
rationality can only be defined in terms of context, so if it you're saying it wasn't irrational given that context, you're saying it wasn't irrational. Yet you're now saying it was irrational.
I think it is I who is failing to see what your point is.
Desert bus is way more action packed than IdleRPG, and also is a single player game, whereas IdleRPG is massively multi-player.
s/look like even worse wack-jobs /look like even worse wack-jobs back then /
If there were no UNESCO tanks on the streets in eastern Europe, why was McCarthy targetting them by name as enemies?
Citation needed?
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anticommunist_Literature_1950s.png
That image really makes (at least some parts of) the US look like even worse wack-jobs than anything in the Bush+-era. I do actually know someone who was brainwashed by/in the 50s, and for whom "UNESCO" is a trigger word which will set her off on an ignorance-fuelled inane rant. (We live in a UNESCO world heritage site, so she probably wants to bomb us back to the middle ages.)
> in the political context of the early 1950:s, fear of communism was not considered irrational.
How rational was the fear of UNESCO?
I often semi-jokingly say that John Major getting re-elected was a direct result of The Daily Mail too. (In particular the middle-aged femail^H^Hle demographic - if you look at voter turnout breakdown, it was the 40-something women that swung the results his way.)
Never underestimate the size, and influence, of the critical-thinking-free segment of the population.
U R HOMO
So google has patented Elisa?
Elisa? Hah! I would appreciate it if you would continue.
Eurasia, America, Africa, Oceania, Antarctica, ... what's missing?
The n900 (and n9) UI were hugely more inconsistent than the first Android (2.x family) device I used for a few weeks, although the subsequent Android (4.x family) device I used for a few months after that was not as consistent as the earlier one - apps had started to introduce their own "menu" buttons on screen in random places, and not have anything useful on the system "menu" button.
...), and I filed *hundreds* of breainead UI inconsistency bugs against both. Depressingly large proportions were simply closed WONTFIX with the sole justification "behaves as specified". It was proven that the management of the UI team were telling lies about the results of UI studies that had been commissioned, in order to justify their crazy decisions.
Spiral zoom in browser - great! Spiral zoom in image gallery - no chance!
Volume zoom in pdf viewer - passable. Volume zoom in txt viewer - no chance! In fact no ability to zoom the text at all without converting it to html.
And which apps rotate to portrait mode, and why do those that don't not rotate?
Disclaimer - I worked on the n900 and n9 (and the two devices between them, and the one after,