If you are too close to the shore, it should not matter. In the middle of the ocean, far from any land, there is no marine life depending on sun light.
For those who did not know: iPhones sales account for 60% of Apple revenue, and 80% of Apple profit. As iPhones go, so goes Apple. Everything else is nearly irrelevant.
What if Android is overtaking iOS in phones, in the same way that Windows overtook MacOS in PCs? For those who don't remember: Apple nearly went bankrupt in the 1990s.
Apple had the same philosophy with PCs in the 1990s that Apple has now with smart phones: super high margins, everything proprietary. Apple expects to be worshiped to the point that Apple does not need to have a better value.
From what I have been reading, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge beats the iPhone in several respects.
It is my understand that Samsung beat Apple to the punch in the following:
higher resolution camera heart rate monitor big display amoled display water resistant wireless charging 1080p display answer by waving wirelessly sharing photos controlling
What if Android is overtaking iOS in phones, in the same way that Windows overtook MacOS in PCs? For those who don't remember: Apple nearly went bankrupt in the 1990s.
Apple had the same philosophy with PCs in the 1990s that Apple has now with smart phones: super high margins, everything proprietary. Apple expects to be worshiped to the point that Apple does not need to have a better value.
From what I have been reading, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge beats the iPhone in several respects.
It is my understand that Samsung beat Apple to the punch in the following:
higher resolution camera heart rate monitor big display amoled display water resistant wireless charging 1080p display answer by waving wirelessly sharing photos controlling a TV
> curious how well you think plants would do in a low-CO2 High-Acid environment.
Straw man much? I never said anything of the sort.
My point is: high levels of CO2, of themselves, hardly insure healthy plant life. There are also matters of temperature, humidity, and the like.
In fact, the entire argument that higher levels of CO2 being good for plants is a straw man argument. Nobody thinks that higher CO2 levels, of themselves, are harmful to plants. The problem is that high levels of CO2 causes a greenhouse effect, which raises global temperatures, which throws the entire climate off balance. This causes unexpected freezes, hurricanes, floods, and droughts.
Why don't plants grow on Venus? Loads of CO2, right?
Aside from CO2, plants also need a certain amount of humidity, not too much, not too little.
Plants also need the correct temperature, not too hot, not too cold.
Then there is the matter of wind.
Rapid global warming, and rapid climate change, is not good for crops, far from it. Ask the California farmers who fought the recent drought. An overnight freeze can ruin tons of crops.
that climate change is pure bunk. And he further claims that everybody who claims otherwise is only do so to make money.
Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwqIy8Ikv-c
> Richard Lindzen, the famously discredited global warming skeptic . . . > Lindzen received $2,500 a day to consult with coal and oil interests here and abroad in the 1990s, a fact Lindzen does not refute.
Some believe Richard Lindzen to be an industry shill > He had been a witness for tobacco companies decades earlier, questioning the reliability of statistical connections between smoking and health problems. > When I met him at a later conference, I did ask that question, and was surprised by his response: He began rattling off all the problems with the date relating smoking to helath problems, which was closely analagous to his views of climate data."
I am guessing that groups like the KKK are monitored by federal law enforcement.
Could such hacking muck with ongoing investigations?
Not long ago, the feds told hacktivists to stop trying to take down ISIS communications. These actions interfere with the people who can actually do something to stop terrorist organizations.
BTW: what has the KKK done in the last 50 years? A few pointless marches?
Am I to understand that every prisoner who claims a "real" religion gets $5 million or privileges?
> $5 million or privileges to order and wear religious clothing and pendants, nor meet for weekly worship services and classes and receive communion
Do pastafarians typically spend that sort of money on their clothing and pendants?
Why not just require that prisoners (or their loved ones) pay for their own clothing, or pendants?
In fact, why not just decide that, while you are in prison, you were prison clothes, and no religious clothes or pendants? Don't like it? Should have thought of that before you committed your crime, you brought it on yourself.
If prisons really pay $5 million per religious, it would sure save taxpayers a lot of money.
How completely silly does a religion have to be, before it's not real?
Lemme see: talking snakes, talking donkeys, leviathans, dragons, unicorns, giants, witches, wizards, sticks that turn into snakes, bringing dead back to life, ascending into heaven, walking on water, entire world under water, earth only six thousand years old - what am I forgetting? And all with zero evidence.
Sure all that is entirely sensible, you would be an idiot to think otherwise. But a flying spaghetti monster? come on now, don't be ridiculous.
> By comparison, Gordon argues, today's technological advancements -- Uber, Facebook, Amazon.com -- will touch the productivity of the American economy lightly -- if at all.
Those are all commercial successes that are built on real innovations.
I must admit, life is not changing as dramatically as it was during the time of Bell, Edison, Wright Brothers, and Ford.
You have misinterpreted the study, and come to many bad conclusions.
Educate yourself:
August 31st 2011 Michael Greger, M.D. Egg Cholesterol in the Diet Cardiology experts warn that eating even a single egg a day may exceed the safe upper limit for cholesterol intake. http://nutritionfacts.org/video/egg-cholesterol-in-the-diet/
September 2nd 2011 Michael Greger, M.D. Egg Industry Blind Spot To help deflect criticism from the cholesterol content of their product, the egg industry touts the benefits of two phytonutrients, lutein and zeaxanthin, that have indeed been shown to be beneficial in protecting one's eyesight against vision threatening conditions such as cataracts and macular degeneration. But how do eggs stack up against plant-based sources? http://nutritionfacts.org/video/egg-industry-blind-spot/
March 11th 2013 Michael Greger, M.D. Eggs vs. Cigarettes in Atherosclerosis A similar exponential increase in carotid artery plaque buildup was found for smokers and egg eaters. http://nutritionfacts.org/video/eggs-vs-cigarettes-in-atherosclerosis/
July 3rd 2013 Michael Greger, M.D. Eggs and Cholesterol: Patently False and Misleading Claims Egg industry claims about egg safety found to be patently false, misleading, and deceptive by the U.S. Court of Appeals. http://nutritionfacts.org/video/eggs-and-cholesterol-patently-false-and-misleading-claims/
February 17th 2014 Michael Greger, M.D. Who Says Eggs Aren’t Healthy or Safe? Freedom of Information Act documents reveal that the U.S. Department of Agriculture warned the egg industry that saying eggs are nutritious or safe may violate rules against false and misleading advertising.
Linda Carney, M.D. Unscrambling the Truth About Eggs http://www.drcarney.com/topics/item/262-unscrambling-the-truth-about-eggs#.Vw7hbGErIW0
AUGUST 31, 2012 BY JOEL FUHRMAN, M.D. Comparing eggs to cigarettes http://www.diseaseproof.com/archives/cardiovascular-disease-comparing-eggs-to-cigarettes.html
An Independent Critique of Low-carb Diets: Cracking Down on Eggs and Cholesterol https://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2013nl/may/travis.pdf
Meta-analysis > Compilation of all the best studies on egg consumption and risk of heart disease going back to 1930, found that, overall, those who ate the most eggs had a 19% increased risk of cardiovascular disease, a 68% increased risk of diabetes, and, once you have diabetes, an even greater 85% increased risk of heart disease 2013 Apr 17 Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a meta-analysis CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that there is a dose-response positive association between egg consumption and the risk of CVD and diabetes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23643053
Intakes of meat, fish, poultry, and eggs and risk of prostate cancer progression. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20042525
Egg consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease and mortality: the Physicians' Health Study http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18400720
Sep 9, 2015 - Bite Size Vegan The GREAT EGG CONSPIRACY: Lies, Corruption & Kevin Bacon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsgDwSvkJdM
EGG-GATE: The American Egg Board Conspiracy Plot Thickens http://www.mfablog.org/egg-gate-the-american-egg-board-conspiracy
51% of greenhouse gases caused by animal agriculture.
Study claims meat creates half of all greenhouse gases http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/study-claims-meat-creates-half-of-all-greenhouse-gases-1812909.html
Animal agriculture also causes numerous other environmental problems.
Everything Wrong With Environmentalism In 11 Minutes Or Less!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlTBC91L-x0
Nuclear futures: thorium could be the silver bullet to solve our energy crisis http://theconversation.com/nuclear-futures-thorium-could-be-the-silver-bullet-to-solve-our-energy-crisis-14056
Will Thorium Save Us From Climate Change? http://ecowatch.com/2014/02/11/will-thorium-save-us-from-climate-change/
Wrong. There was never a scientific censuses on global cooling. I think there was one article, in a news magazine, published in the 1970s. And the article was just a thought, not a conclusion reached by serious scientific research.
This information seems to be presented in a deliberately misleading way. We should not be surprised that so many posters here have completely misunderstood the results of the study.
This study does not say that butter, saturated fats, triglycerides, or cholesterol have been proved healthy. Far from it.
Rather, this study seems to indicate that linoleic acid is so horribly unhealthy that it compares to butter.
Furthermore, linoleic acid is *not* commonly used in margarine. Direct quote from the post: "the vegetable oils mentioned in the article are not necessarily the most commonly used (which are oils made of olive, sunflower, coconut, and palm)."
Slashdot Mirror
If you are too close to the shore, it should not matter. In the middle of the ocean, far from any land, there is no marine life depending on sun light.
For those who did not know: iPhones sales account for 60% of Apple revenue, and 80% of Apple profit. As iPhones go, so goes Apple. Everything else is nearly irrelevant.
What if Android is overtaking iOS in phones, in the same way that Windows overtook MacOS in PCs? For those who don't remember: Apple nearly went bankrupt in the 1990s.
Apple had the same philosophy with PCs in the 1990s that Apple has now with smart phones: super high margins, everything proprietary. Apple expects to be worshiped to the point that Apple does not need to have a better value.
From what I have been reading, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge beats the iPhone in several respects.
It is my understand that Samsung beat Apple to the punch in the following:
higher resolution camera
heart rate monitor
big display
amoled display
water resistant
wireless charging
1080p display
answer by waving
wirelessly sharing photos
controlling
I bought a Samsung Chromebook for $150. I am happy with it. Inexpensive, no fuss, fast boot, battery lasts all day and then some.
I could run Linux on it, but I am happy with it the way it is.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvfbpq_simpsons-hp-joke_fun
What if Android is overtaking iOS in phones, in the same way that Windows overtook MacOS in PCs? For those who don't remember: Apple nearly went bankrupt in the 1990s.
Apple had the same philosophy with PCs in the 1990s that Apple has now with smart phones: super high margins, everything proprietary. Apple expects to be worshiped to the point that Apple does not need to have a better value.
From what I have been reading, the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge beats the iPhone in several respects.
It is my understand that Samsung beat Apple to the punch in the following:
higher resolution camera
heart rate monitor
big display
amoled display
water resistant
wireless charging
1080p display
answer by waving
wirelessly sharing photos
controlling a TV
Maybe it's time to use a different video service?
> curious how well you think plants would do in a low-CO2 High-Acid environment.
Straw man much? I never said anything of the sort.
My point is: high levels of CO2, of themselves, hardly insure healthy plant life. There are also matters of temperature, humidity, and the like.
In fact, the entire argument that higher levels of CO2 being good for plants is a straw man argument. Nobody thinks that higher CO2 levels, of themselves, are harmful to plants. The problem is that high levels of CO2 causes a greenhouse effect, which raises global temperatures, which throws the entire climate off balance. This causes unexpected freezes, hurricanes, floods, and droughts.
Why don't plants grow on Venus? Loads of CO2, right?
Aside from CO2, plants also need a certain amount of humidity, not too much, not too little.
Plants also need the correct temperature, not too hot, not too cold.
Then there is the matter of wind.
Rapid global warming, and rapid climate change, is not good for crops, far from it. Ask the California farmers who fought the recent drought. An overnight freeze can ruin tons of crops.
that climate change is pure bunk. And he further claims that everybody who claims otherwise is only do so to make money.
Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwqIy8Ikv-c
> Richard Lindzen, the famously discredited global warming skeptic . . .
> Lindzen received $2,500 a day to consult with coal and oil interests here and abroad in the 1990s, a fact Lindzen does not refute.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/laurie-david/richard-lindzen-global-wa_b_19010.html
Some believe Richard Lindzen to be an industry shill
> He had been a witness for tobacco companies decades earlier, questioning the reliability of statistical connections between smoking and health problems.
> When I met him at a later conference, I did ask that question, and was surprised by his response: He began rattling off all the problems with the date relating smoking to helath problems, which was closely analagous to his views of climate data."
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Richard_S._Lindzen
I am guessing that groups like the KKK are monitored by federal law enforcement.
Could such hacking muck with ongoing investigations?
Not long ago, the feds told hacktivists to stop trying to take down ISIS communications. These actions interfere with the people who can actually do something to stop terrorist organizations.
BTW: what has the KKK done in the last 50 years? A few pointless marches?
Hillary would be in prison, if there were any justice in this country.
Instead, she is a strong contender for POUS.
Hillary makes Nixon look like a boy scout.
My understanding is: VPNs are not that expensive. I think some are actually free.
So what is the problem?
Am I to understand that every prisoner who claims a "real" religion gets $5 million or privileges?
> $5 million or privileges to order and wear religious clothing and pendants, nor meet for weekly worship services and classes and receive communion
Do pastafarians typically spend that sort of money on their clothing and pendants?
Why not just require that prisoners (or their loved ones) pay for their own clothing, or pendants?
In fact, why not just decide that, while you are in prison, you were prison clothes, and no religious clothes or pendants? Don't like it? Should have thought of that before you committed your crime, you brought it on yourself.
If prisons really pay $5 million per religious, it would sure save taxpayers a lot of money.
Almost as if the state is deciding which religion is the correct religion for you to worship.
How completely silly does a religion have to be, before it's not real?
Lemme see: talking snakes, talking donkeys, leviathans, dragons, unicorns, giants, witches, wizards, sticks that turn into snakes, bringing dead back to life, ascending into heaven, walking on water, entire world under water, earth only six thousand years old - what am I forgetting? And all with zero evidence.
Sure all that is entirely sensible, you would be an idiot to think otherwise. But a flying spaghetti monster? come on now, don't be ridiculous.
> By comparison, Gordon argues, today's technological advancements -- Uber, Facebook, Amazon.com -- will touch the productivity of the American economy lightly -- if at all.
Those are all commercial successes that are built on real innovations.
I must admit, life is not changing as dramatically as it was during the time of Bell, Edison, Wright Brothers, and Ford.
Not sure how Palin plans to dismiss the legions of real scientists who have all concluded that climate change is real, and man made.
Of course Bill Nye never did any primary research on climate change, but he knows enough to recognize real science.
You have misinterpreted the study, and come to many bad conclusions.
Educate yourself:
August 31st 2011 Michael Greger, M.D.
Egg Cholesterol in the Diet
Cardiology experts warn that eating even a single egg a day may exceed the safe upper limit for cholesterol intake.
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/egg-cholesterol-in-the-diet/
September 2nd 2011 Michael Greger, M.D.
Egg Industry Blind Spot
To help deflect criticism from the cholesterol content of their product, the egg industry touts the benefits of two phytonutrients, lutein and zeaxanthin, that have indeed been shown to be beneficial in protecting one's eyesight against vision threatening conditions such as cataracts and macular degeneration. But how do eggs stack up against plant-based sources?
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/egg-industry-blind-spot/
March 11th 2013 Michael Greger, M.D.
Eggs vs. Cigarettes in Atherosclerosis
A similar exponential increase in carotid artery plaque buildup was found for smokers and egg eaters.
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/eggs-vs-cigarettes-in-atherosclerosis/
July 3rd 2013 Michael Greger, M.D.
Eggs and Cholesterol: Patently False and Misleading Claims
Egg industry claims about egg safety found to be patently false, misleading, and deceptive by the U.S. Court of Appeals.
http://nutritionfacts.org/video/eggs-and-cholesterol-patently-false-and-misleading-claims/
February 17th 2014 Michael Greger, M.D.
Who Says Eggs Aren’t Healthy or Safe?
Freedom of Information Act documents reveal that the U.S. Department of Agriculture warned the egg industry that saying eggs are nutritious or safe may violate rules against false and misleading advertising.
Linda Carney, M.D.
Unscrambling the Truth About Eggs
http://www.drcarney.com/topics/item/262-unscrambling-the-truth-about-eggs#.Vw7hbGErIW0
AUGUST 31, 2012 BY JOEL FUHRMAN, M.D.
Comparing eggs to cigarettes
http://www.diseaseproof.com/archives/cardiovascular-disease-comparing-eggs-to-cigarettes.html
An Independent Critique of Low-carb Diets: Cracking Down on Eggs and Cholesterol
https://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2013nl/may/travis.pdf
Meta-analysis
> Compilation of all the best studies on egg consumption and risk of heart disease going back to 1930, found that, overall, those who ate the most eggs had a 19% increased risk of cardiovascular disease, a 68% increased risk of diabetes, and, once you have diabetes, an even greater 85% increased risk of heart disease
2013 Apr 17
Egg consumption and risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: a meta-analysis
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that there is a dose-response positive association between egg consumption and the risk of CVD and diabetes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23643053
Intakes of meat, fish, poultry, and eggs and risk of prostate cancer progression.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20042525
Egg consumption in relation to cardiovascular disease and mortality: the Physicians' Health Study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18400720
Sep 9, 2015 - Bite Size Vegan
The GREAT EGG CONSPIRACY: Lies, Corruption & Kevin Bacon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsgDwSvkJdM
EGG-GATE: The American Egg Board Conspiracy Plot Thickens
http://www.mfablog.org/egg-gate-the-american-egg-board-conspiracy
> That leaves two options.
> 1. Export people from Earth to other worlds.
> 2. Eliminate people.
WTF? Are you certain those are the only two options?
What about cleaner source of energy? Thorium maybe?
What about eating less animal products?
> The food scientist consensus was that saturated fats etc made people fat, so they switched America to a low-fat high-carb diet.
WTF? Care to cite your source on that?
Google sure hates Linux these days.
51% of greenhouse gases caused by animal agriculture.
Study claims meat creates half of all greenhouse gases
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/study-claims-meat-creates-half-of-all-greenhouse-gases-1812909.html
Animal agriculture also causes numerous other environmental problems.
Everything Wrong With Environmentalism In 11 Minutes Or Less!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlTBC91L-x0
Nuclear futures: thorium could be the silver bullet to solve our energy crisis
http://theconversation.com/nuclear-futures-thorium-could-be-the-silver-bullet-to-solve-our-energy-crisis-14056
Will Thorium Save Us From Climate Change?
http://ecowatch.com/2014/02/11/will-thorium-save-us-from-climate-change/
> This is why they went from Global Cooling
Wrong. There was never a scientific censuses on global cooling. I think there was one article, in a news magazine, published in the 1970s. And the article was just a thought, not a conclusion reached by serious scientific research.
Animal agriculture is said to cause 51% of greenhouse gases.
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/study-claims-meat-creates-half-of-all-greenhouse-gases-1812909.html
Something very simple to do, which you can do today.
And greenhouse gases are only part of the environmental destruction caused by the animal agriculture.
Everything Wrong With Environmentalism In 11 Minutes Or Less!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlTBC91L-x0
This information seems to be presented in a deliberately misleading way. We should not be surprised that so many posters here have completely misunderstood the results of the study.
This study does not say that butter, saturated fats, triglycerides, or cholesterol have been proved healthy. Far from it.
Rather, this study seems to indicate that linoleic acid is so horribly unhealthy that it compares to butter.
Furthermore, linoleic acid is *not* commonly used in margarine. Direct quote from the post: "the vegetable oils mentioned in the article are not necessarily the most commonly used (which are oils made of olive, sunflower, coconut, and palm)."