It can only really happen when the Republicans see that Trump is such an unbelievable liability that they have to replace him with Pence. It's a testament to their lack of character that this hasn't already happened. Once his approval dips below a certain point they'll probably have to pull the trigger. Pence is an odious cunt, of that there can be little doubt - white christian america, women as a slave class, etc - but even Democrats are saying put him in charge. That gives you an idea of what a disaster Trump is for the US. Every day that goes by, it gets weaker and its strategic enemies get stronger.
They can keep him if they want, I don't give that much of a fuck either way. Self-inflicted injuries are the most entertaining.
Oh, I don't know. How about not roll back the sanctions you placed on them for doing exactly this?
Is Putin a "good guy"? No, of course not, but why the hell do we care?
They're running rings around you, they're laughing their fucking asses off at you. But why should you care. Your institutions are undermined and you have utterly incompetent leadership. Don't bother caring, the Russians are your friends. Putin and his lovely brand of kleptocracy are your friends. lol.
Hillary may not have been pure as snow, but your understanding of reality is purely fucked.
The mental gymnastics required to feel OK about a russian fucking mole in the white house are truly epic. Hillary always comes riding to the rescue, often with emails in tow.
Mentions of H Clinton in post you're replying to: 0.
"But her emails.."
You realise even partisan democrats are saying put Pence in charge? Not Hilary. Pence. Now's the time for your spastic to show why Trump is better than Pence. Is it his manchild-esque behaviour that sets him apart? Shitty memory, barely functioning brain, overwhelming narcissism, borderline illiteracy... What is it?
If the Very Big Corporation of America can save $1 by increasing the odds of hurting a child by 0.0000000001%, blah blah blah.
Typical leftist groupthink.
"I don't have a convincing response so I'll post a pathetic strawman and label it 'leftist' groupthink" - Dumbass AC
The whole 'public sector is terrible at everything' mantra is spewed out constantly by powerful forces that want everybody to think that. Some willing acolytes gobble it up and spew it out everywhere. And yet look at the state of your healthcare system. Yeah, sure, private is always better.
Seems some libertarians would like nothing better than sticking a quarter into a toll gate every few streets and scraping the shit off their steaks. Not to forget, suing some local company when they realise they've been drinking arsenic for the last ten years.
What is the problem with allowing people to make money? Sure they should be allowed to make money by providing a service people is want to pay for...
What i would like to have is rules against:
- Bumping people without the passenger getting what they want in compensation.. Let the airline buy back the ticket for what the passenger is willing to sell it for.
- Size of seats.. make it mandatory when selling seats that if a person is too wide for a seat (overflowing to the next seat) they should not be allowed on the plane.. And also offering seats of different sizes.
- Legroom.. Offer seats with different amount of legroom so long people get seats with enough legroom where they fit without interfering with people sitting next to them..
And allow for tickets that allow, and present it clearly to the passenger, infringe on these things... If you want a cheapass ticket then feel free to get one..
Maybe also put a maximum profit per flight in % of what they take in.. maybe 30%?
This is about Air Traffic Control. None of what you posted is in any way relevant.
There sure are a lot of slashdottirs who share Mr Trump's thoughtful and considered view on climate change skepticism. Maybe it's because they don't like it, as I suspect is the case with orange dickhead.
That word strikes again. "May". There is never a time when recent studies definitely had no falsified data. The opposite of this would be far more newsworthy, which is usually a good sign that someone has been wasting their time. There always has to be skepticism of studies, that's why replication is required.
lol. Poor Jesus. If you're against Trump, you're against Jesus, remember that. Any other fictional characters I should be linking with your orange hero?
Do you know what 'may' means? It makes a statement conditional. It might be this, might not be this. Hopefully that helps, but maybe it's like explaining calculus to a dog. I just dunno.
First you check for the conditions. No point looking for hard evidence if the conditions aren't/weren't even there. Is that too complicated for you? Why are you reading this anyway? You should have a good think about that question.
DNA didn't exist when the earliest life arose. Thanks for demonstrating that you know fuck all beyond mystery-mongering. Let's pop you in the box marked 'last group of humans you should ever talk to about this topic'.
To expect it on Mars shows a real knowledge problem. When people talk about areas beyond their expertise, you get garbage.
Are you trying to punch a hole in reality with sheer irony?
Slashdot Mirror
No desire to ever have one of these dumb squawk boxes lying around. A parrot has a better understanding of language.
You think Bush actually thought there were WMDs in Iraq? Cute.
It can only really happen when the Republicans see that Trump is such an unbelievable liability that they have to replace him with Pence. It's a testament to their lack of character that this hasn't already happened. Once his approval dips below a certain point they'll probably have to pull the trigger. Pence is an odious cunt, of that there can be little doubt - white christian america, women as a slave class, etc - but even Democrats are saying put him in charge. That gives you an idea of what a disaster Trump is for the US. Every day that goes by, it gets weaker and its strategic enemies get stronger.
They can keep him if they want, I don't give that much of a fuck either way. Self-inflicted injuries are the most entertaining.
That's the advantage of having your mind made up ahead of time. When the contrary evidence comes you're already primed to dismiss it.
Oh, I don't know. How about not roll back the sanctions you placed on them for doing exactly this?
Is Putin a "good guy"? No, of course not, but why the hell do we care?
They're running rings around you, they're laughing their fucking asses off at you. But why should you care. Your institutions are undermined and you have utterly incompetent leadership. Don't bother caring, the Russians are your friends. Putin and his lovely brand of kleptocracy are your friends. lol.
Hillary may not have been pure as snow, but your understanding of reality is purely fucked.
The mental gymnastics required to feel OK about a russian fucking mole in the white house are truly epic. Hillary always comes riding to the rescue, often with emails in tow.
Mentions of H Clinton in post you're replying to: 0.
"But her emails.."
You realise even partisan democrats are saying put Pence in charge? Not Hilary. Pence. Now's the time for your spastic to show why Trump is better than Pence. Is it his manchild-esque behaviour that sets him apart? Shitty memory, barely functioning brain, overwhelming narcissism, borderline illiteracy... What is it?
*should know that this is a joke by now.
That was the only mistake you found in your post? lol.
The dark hand of the liberal arts people is everywhere, is it not? Haha
educate people
Good luck with that. You can't educate people who already know everything.
Criticism without presenting solutions is just whining.
"Don't mention problems unless you already know how to fix them."
Painfully fucking stupid point.
If the Very Big Corporation of America can save $1 by increasing the odds of hurting a child by 0.0000000001%, blah blah blah. Typical leftist groupthink.
"I don't have a convincing response so I'll post a pathetic strawman and label it 'leftist' groupthink" - Dumbass AC
Do you boil everything down to the most petty semantics? How crushingly boring.
The whole 'public sector is terrible at everything' mantra is spewed out constantly by powerful forces that want everybody to think that. Some willing acolytes gobble it up and spew it out everywhere. And yet look at the state of your healthcare system. Yeah, sure, private is always better.
Seems some libertarians would like nothing better than sticking a quarter into a toll gate every few streets and scraping the shit off their steaks. Not to forget, suing some local company when they realise they've been drinking arsenic for the last ten years.
where both the far left and far right claim that we need Government to be our savior.
Far left? What you thinking... Trotskyism? Leninism?
Far right? National socialism fans? Mussolini acolytes?
If you're from the US, you probably have weird ideas about what constitutes 'far' left and right. Seems to frequently be the case.
What is the problem with allowing people to make money? Sure they should be allowed to make money by providing a service people is want to pay for... What i would like to have is rules against: - Bumping people without the passenger getting what they want in compensation.. Let the airline buy back the ticket for what the passenger is willing to sell it for. - Size of seats.. make it mandatory when selling seats that if a person is too wide for a seat (overflowing to the next seat) they should not be allowed on the plane.. And also offering seats of different sizes. - Legroom.. Offer seats with different amount of legroom so long people get seats with enough legroom where they fit without interfering with people sitting next to them..
And allow for tickets that allow, and present it clearly to the passenger, infringe on these things... If you want a cheapass ticket then feel free to get one..
Maybe also put a maximum profit per flight in % of what they take in.. maybe 30%?
This is about Air Traffic Control. None of what you posted is in any way relevant.
There sure are a lot of slashdottirs who share Mr Trump's thoughtful and considered view on climate change skepticism. Maybe it's because they don't like it, as I suspect is the case with orange dickhead.
Somebody is actually spending time feeling outraged about this 31 genders nonsense?
Some people spend most of their time being outraged about that sort of thing. I only know one personally. He's stupid.
That word strikes again. "May". There is never a time when recent studies definitely had no falsified data. The opposite of this would be far more newsworthy, which is usually a good sign that someone has been wasting their time. There always has to be skepticism of studies, that's why replication is required.
Holy shit, how can you even load up a browser if you're that stupid? Woosh.
So you admit to being a lazy deluded Millenia?
And the point is.... you are entitled to it?
ok.....I'm not disagreeing with you, but how is that different from the generalisations?
Did you take reading comprehension? It just it looks like you didn't. Millenia? Are you just stupid, yeah?
anti Jesus,
lol. Poor Jesus. If you're against Trump, you're against Jesus, remember that. Any other fictional characters I should be linking with your orange hero?
Do you know what 'may' means? It makes a statement conditional. It might be this, might not be this. Hopefully that helps, but maybe it's like explaining calculus to a dog. I just dunno.
First you check for the conditions. No point looking for hard evidence if the conditions aren't/weren't even there. Is that too complicated for you? Why are you reading this anyway? You should have a good think about that question.
If your going to speculate
You're clearly very smart.
DNA didn't exist when the earliest life arose. Thanks for demonstrating that you know fuck all beyond mystery-mongering. Let's pop you in the box marked 'last group of humans you should ever talk to about this topic'.
To expect it on Mars shows a real knowledge problem. When people talk about areas beyond their expertise, you get garbage.
Are you trying to punch a hole in reality with sheer irony?
Oh, and it's "hubris".