Well what have we here. Looks like I must update my mental definition of 'schizophrenia' based on what this AC said. Forget all the stuff about paranoid delusions, scary auditory and visual hallucinations, etc - it's "a description for a set of behaviours that are viewed as abnormal ALL caused by traumatic events during childhood".
You should write it all down while you still remember it clearly. The more coherent it is, the less likely it is to be delusional. I'm quite prepared to believe that stuff like that went down, but you can't assess the credibility until you see it all splayed out.
You throw around straw man, not realising, apparently, that it's an informal fallacy and by itself doesn't prove or disprove anything ("you lose" - lol). Doesn't do your credibility any favours.
If it isn't thinner a lot of people are going to be very, very angry. We need to aim for phones that are effectively invisible when viewed side on. If that means the screen has to go, so be it.
It sounds more like he's suggesting terraforming technology developed for Mars could be used on Earth. Not something that is likely to happen tbh, Mars doesn't have the mass or magnetic field needed to hold on to an atmosphere, regardless of its composition.
Provided that the Universe has at least 100 bn galaxies
A newer study recently changed that estimate to 2 trillion galaxies. Of course, that number is still increasing as the cosmic horizon is still growing.
I don't have an opinion on this yet, because the only way it's come to my attention is through a highly biased source (you).
However I see one red flag straight away. Headline "Yale Students Demand English Department Stop Teaching White Male Poets".
Actual quote: "It is unacceptable that a Yale student considering studying English literature might read only white male authors."
You just conflated "ban teaching of white poets" with "we don't want ONLY white poets".
Did you conflate the two on purpose because your arguments are so weak as to only be applicable to straw men, or did you conflate the two because you're stupid and incapable of nuanced thought? Inquiring minds want to know.
The alleged fine tuning for life in our physical laws will probably turn out to be nothing more than part of our address in space. Whether that be the string landscape or some equivalent in quantum loop or some other theory. Don't waste your time looking for design.
Just plan to pay for it later when the next generation asks why you did it.
lol. I think you best be careful before you punch a hole in reality with sheer irony. You're talking about future generations? You're the cunt that claims there's no problem. You'll still be saying that when the water's lapping around your dumbass ankles.
Slashdot Mirror
Didn't you mod yourself up? You new to this sockpuppet malarkey?
And what a *SURPRISE*, they both make Android phones.
You sound smart. Not quite smart enough to realise that everyone makes Android phones, but smart nonetheless.
That's you on the no-fly list. Enjoy.
No such thing as "pollution".
That's on the order of a toddler's understanding of the situation, sure.
You should be laughing at what a prick he makes you all look.
You're too stupid to even know you're a dumbass.
Sadly true of all dumbasses.
I mean, that's the main problem with them. They all think they're fucking geniuses.
Well what have we here. Looks like I must update my mental definition of 'schizophrenia' based on what this AC said. Forget all the stuff about paranoid delusions, scary auditory and visual hallucinations, etc - it's "a description for a set of behaviours that are viewed as abnormal ALL caused by traumatic events during childhood".
Thanks AC. Can I quote you?
You should write it all down while you still remember it clearly. The more coherent it is, the less likely it is to be delusional. I'm quite prepared to believe that stuff like that went down, but you can't assess the credibility until you see it all splayed out.
Companies can't tell our data with impunity like over with you, so y'know it's swings and roundabouts.
You throw around straw man, not realising, apparently, that it's an informal fallacy and by itself doesn't prove or disprove anything ("you lose" - lol). Doesn't do your credibility any favours.
Hey Felix, nice swastika. Wanna bring it to the white house?
Don't you have anything better to do?
Ding ding. That's precisely it.
No. He doesn't.
If it isn't thinner a lot of people are going to be very, very angry. We need to aim for phones that are effectively invisible when viewed side on. If that means the screen has to go, so be it.
It sounds more like he's suggesting terraforming technology developed for Mars could be used on Earth. Not something that is likely to happen tbh, Mars doesn't have the mass or magnetic field needed to hold on to an atmosphere, regardless of its composition.
A "mild" case of having an extra chromosome? Is that like a mild case of losing a leg?
Provided that the Universe has at least 100 bn galaxies
A newer study recently changed that estimate to 2 trillion galaxies. Of course, that number is still increasing as the cosmic horizon is still growing.
I don't have an opinion on this yet, because the only way it's come to my attention is through a highly biased source (you).
However I see one red flag straight away. Headline "Yale Students Demand English Department Stop Teaching White Male Poets".
Actual quote: "It is unacceptable that a Yale student considering studying English literature might read only white male authors."
You just conflated "ban teaching of white poets" with "we don't want ONLY white poets".
Did you conflate the two on purpose because your arguments are so weak as to only be applicable to straw men, or did you conflate the two because you're stupid and incapable of nuanced thought? Inquiring minds want to know.
See ya
The alleged fine tuning for life in our physical laws will probably turn out to be nothing more than part of our address in space. Whether that be the string landscape or some equivalent in quantum loop or some other theory. Don't waste your time looking for design.
We should have never made the internet easy enough for these dumbass creationists to get on to it.
Arable land is down. GMO increases yields. I expect you're opposed to those, seeing as that's the idiotic position to take on the matter?
Just plan to pay for it later when the next generation asks why you did it.
lol. I think you best be careful before you punch a hole in reality with sheer irony. You're talking about future generations? You're the cunt that claims there's no problem. You'll still be saying that when the water's lapping around your dumbass ankles.
I bet you think snow disproves climate change. That's really no less dumb than what you just came out with.
There are plants and animals that are adapted to living there. Entities that help to keep the earth habitable. I wouldn't expect you to understand.