Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Is Really Boring (bloomberg.com)

Sometimes it is hard to tell if Elon Musk is serious about the things he says. But as for his "boring" claims, that's really happening. In a wide-range interview with Bloomberg, the billionaire talked more about his new venture, The Boring Company. The idea began on a Saturday morning a few weeks ago when Musk tweeted, "Traffic is driving me nuts. Am going to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging..." Over the course of next few hours later, Musk added, "It shall be called 'The Boring Company,' Boring, it's what we do. I am actually going to do this. Excerpts from the story: And so, around noon on a Friday in January, an excavation crew started digging. "I was like, 'Hey, what's the biggest hole we can make by Sunday evening?'" Musk says. [...] "My other idea was to call it Tunnels R Us and to essentially troll Toys "R" Us into filing a lawsuit," he says, letting out a loud and well-articulated ha-ha-ha-ha. "Now we've decided to troll AT&T instead! We're going to call it American Tubes and Tunnels." When I ask him if the tunnel venture will be a subsidiary of SpaceX or an independent company, he responds cryptically. "Don't you read my Twitter? The Boring Company. Or TBC. To Be Continued." An aide chimes in: Yes, the Boring Company, aka To Be Continued, aka Tunnels R Us, aka American Tubes and Tunnels, aka whatever, will indeed be an independent company. Tunnel technology is older than rockets, and boring speeds are pretty much what they were 50 years ago. Musk says he hopes to build a much faster tunneling machine and use it to dig thousands of miles, eventually creating a vast underground network that includes as many as 30 levels of tunnels for cars and high-speed trains such as the Hyperloop. Musk chose the SpaceX parking lot as the site of his first dig, mostly because it was convenient and he could legally do so without city permits. The plan is to expand the current hole into a ramp designed for a large tunnel boring machine and then start digging horizontally once the machine is 50 feet or so below ground, which would make it low enough to clear gas and sewer lines and to be undetectable at the surface. 100 marks to Bloomberg for the headline, and the story which is as funny as it is insightful.

226 comments

  1. Focus, Elon, focus!! by haruchai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Between making SpaceX & Tesla profitable - or cutting the cash losses - and raising 5 kids, don't you have enough already on your plate?

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Focus, Elon, focus!! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's just the thing. He already has enough on his plate, so now he has to dig under it.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Focus, Elon, focus!! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      He might also want to have an environmental impact statement from the EPA on what would happen by excessively boring the earth from a myriad combination of locations

    3. Re: Focus, Elon, focus!! by oobayly · · Score: 1

      What's the point, the EPA won't exist in any useful form of Trump gets his way.

    4. Re:Focus, Elon, focus!! by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Between making SpaceX & Tesla profitable - or cutting the cash losses - and raising 5 kids, don't you have enough already on your plate?

      SpaceX and Tesla are at an iteration stage. The building blocks are already in place and all that is needed is to ramp up production. Just what do you think Mr Musk should do? Micromanage the assembly line like any good CEO?

      CEOs for the most part make strategic decision. The outcomes of those decision often take a while to come to fruition. About the best thing he can do for both Tesla and SpaceX is leave the damn things alone for a year and let the engineers and workers get the gears turning.

    5. Re:Focus, Elon, focus!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He started looking again like my half brother, known father, partially known my mother. And the name reference, of course. Quaalude would be a wrong reference, though, meaning somebody else, but Aspirin would be more accurate.

    6. Re: Focus, Elon, focus!! by GlennKukkee · · Score: 1

      Different people serve different ways. It may be that you learn's strength is in the inspiration and not implementation stage; it makes sense for a chronic start up maven to have many peripheral start ups. I think he's in a sweet spot: get something unlikely up and moving, make a bunch of media, get the interest rolling, recoup his money and get on to the next part of ...colonizing marrrrs.

  2. He's clearly insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But I knew that already.

    1. Re:He's clearly insane by DickBreath · · Score: 0

      Thank you for pointing out that Elon is now qualified to run for president.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:He's clearly insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for pointing out that Elon is now qualified to run for president.

      Tragically, he isn't. Unless you mean President of South Africa.

      But yes, the 'insane' part would probably help him get the job there too.

    3. Re:He's clearly insane by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Why would any sane person ever run for president?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    4. Re:He's clearly insane by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      A sane person would not. Elon was accused of being insane. I don't happen to agree with that assertion. But it was stated. I believe insanity to be a qualification for president. Current administration being an extreme example. However as another poster pointed out, Elon could not become US president for other reasons, despite the alleged insanity.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. No matter the venture or idea... by geekmux · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...we probably need to legalize whatever he's smoking.

    1. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Whatever he's on, he sure is digging it.

    2. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by HxBro · · Score: 1

      Lets get them out of the way shall we, here's a load of boring puns

      Elon is digging himself into a hole again

      He's going to have to dig deep on this one

      Hope he doesn't get tunnel vision

      He's going to a whole lot of trouble to go somewhere faster

    3. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      He's soon gonna be 50 feet under.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Lets get them out of the way shall we, here's a load of boring puns"

      There is a whole town dedicated to those: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    5. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      When you're in a hole, keep digging.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    6. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Nothing mashing SpaceX with Boring with Hyperloops? Its not rocket science to keep your tunnel from going in a circles - with enough battery power!

    7. Re:No matter the venture or idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man that's deep, bro

  4. Good on him by mean+pun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before all the sour-pusses have their say, I want to say this: good on him.

    Will it work? No idea, but at least he's trying. And betting against Musk is always risky.

    Is he crazy? Since he has so much money, and since he's not destructive, no, he is not crazy, he's eccentric.

    1. Re:Good on him by Kiuas · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Will it work? No idea, but at least he's trying.

      With Musk the right question is never 'will it work?" but 'will it make any sense factoring in the costs?'

      In theory something like the Hyperloop is a great idea. Until you realize that the costs and dangers involved in building a several hundred mile vacuum tube, and keeping it depressurized would cost astronomical amounts of money. The test track the built for the recent pod-competition for hyperloop was less than a mile long and its still the second largest vacuum tube ever built. Took about 30 minutes to depressurize and top speeds were around 60 mph, and that's with them being pushed by an external motor unit, the pods themselves didn't even have functioning engines. The moment the external motor 'released' the pods they pretty much froze, with most of them not even making it across the finish line.

      The practical difficulties in doing this on the scale and speeds that the hyperloop project has been painting (600 MPH over a distance of hundreds of miles) are so enormous especially taking into consideration the kind of safety features that'd have to be included that economically speaking the hyperloop is not going to happen in any foreseeable future barring major technological breakthroughs in vacuum technology and structural engineering. The cost-benefit ratio is simply way too poor.

      Now theoretically, you can eliminate some of the technical issues such as thermal expansion by by burying the hyperloop underground, but that increases the cost even more.

      Is he crazy? Since he has so much money, and since he's not destructive, no, he is not crazy, he's eccentric.

      Agreed. He's an eccentric man with a lot of ideas, some of which turn out to be economically feasible/profitable, while other are not so.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    2. Re:Good on him by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Randomly digging through the earth can in fact be quite destructive. Just ask anyone who's ever done just that without calling the utilities first, and opened a Natural Gas main. Or anybody living in north-central Fracklahoma

    3. Re:Good on him by ranton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With Musk the right question is never 'will it work?" but 'will it make any sense factoring in the costs?'

      That is the great thing about having billionaires with the curiosity of engineers. Musk is willing to find out if these 'crazy' ideas make any sense factoring in the costs. Let your average VCs fund the companies whose ideas will most likely work. Men like Musk are the ones with the freedom to investigate the ideas which will probably not work, but would be phenomenal if the general wisdom is wrong.

      IMHO Musk is filling in for governments who aren't spending enough on basic research and grand innovative ventures. For these projects it is expected that you will fail far more often than you succeed, which is why traditional investors stay away. I hope Musk keeps up his current pace of innovation for the next 30 years.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    4. Re:Good on him by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Fracking is totally different than digging because you pump high pressure fluids into the ground, opening up cracks.

      And if you go deep enough, there won't be any gas pipes.

    5. Re:Good on him by Viol8 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "That is the great thing about having billionaires with the curiosity of engineers."

      Yes, but a dose of realism helps. His hyperloop would require the longest tunnel ever built by a significant margin, NASA spec pressure vessels and motors that can function in a vacuum and some as yet undecided method of evacuating people from shuttle in a vacuum. The cost alone will be so astromonically high that not even Musk could afford it on his own. It would in real terms probably be equivalent in cost to the moon landings and for what? Something in theory slightly more energy efficient than an airliner but with far less capacity than a similar air route.

    6. Re:Good on him by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      The same dose of realism that told people that reusable rockets would never work ?

      Also, in trying to solve these problems you learn a lot of stuff. Even when the project fails, that knowledge can be used in other projects, either related or totally unrelated.

    7. Re:Good on him by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      Anyone wanna take bets that this new drill is actually for mars? He is just prototyping it on planet planet earth first.

    8. Re:Good on him by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "The same dose of realism that told people that reusable rockets would never work ?"

      I'm not saying it won't work, I'm saying the costs will be so ridiculously high for so little benefit that I just don't see the point. Rockets got man into space, somewhere he'd never been before. This gets man from A to B just like an airliner and at the same speed. And thats worth spending trillions on is it? I don't think so.

      If he really wanted to improve US transportation he'd invest in some 200+mph railways that europe and japan have had for decades which have pretty much killed off a lot of short distance air routes.

      "Even when the project fails, that knowledge can be used in other projects, either related or totally unrelated"

      Possibly. But the chance of some useful niche tech as a side effect is hardly reason to blow the amount of money that this will cost.

    9. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the real value. The shortsightedness of the modern world demanding ROI and dividends and profits in 5 years has been, in some ways, horrible for innovation. It takes someone with a dedication to R&D to really push new ideas forward. It took RCA almost 30 years to develop and fund the color television and it paid off immensely when it did. When Bell had to literally dump money to stave off a monopoly lawsuit by the fed(didn't prevent it, just delayed it) they just poured truckloads of money into this new thing called "Bell Labs" and had some of the most massive breakthroughs in tech. Companies see something non-profitable and call it a failure, others can find the value of the information gained.

      *Viol8 just a note I'm not calling you shortsighted for your opinion, it's a criticism on the institution as a whole not a person.

    10. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you go deep enough, there won't be any gas pipes.

      You are correct. It is Morlock's all the way down.

    11. Re:Good on him by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying it won't work, I'm saying the costs will be so ridiculously high for so little benefit that I just don't see the point.

      With "work" I implied cost effective.

      And thats worth spending trillions on is it?

      No, but he's not spending trillions on it. We're still in the prototype phase, and we'll stay there until he's figured out a way to make it cheaper, or cancel the project.

      But the chance of some useful niche tech as a side effect is hardly reason to blow the amount of money that this will cost

      No, money will be spend to achieve the main goal. But having a few nice side effects could soften the blow of losing the money if the project is cancelled. And vacuum tech will be useful in space or on Mars.

    12. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before all the sour-pusses have their say, I want to say this: good on him.

      Will it work? No idea, but at least he's trying. And betting against Musk is always risky.

      Is he crazy? Since he has so much money, and since he's not destructive, no, he is not crazy, he's eccentric.

      Yep. Betting against Musk is risky. He has a frighteningly good track record.

      Which is why it baffles me how come there is so much short selling of Tesla stock.

      Part of me is looking forward to the Model 3 launch, watching the stock price soar and the shorters lose their shirts. The other part of me is hoping that it isn't my pension fund that's doing the shorting.

    13. Re:Good on him by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Apples and Oranges. Colour TV was a qualitative improvement on B&W. Musks idea isn't any sort of improvement on flying and in fact I can't imagine many people wanting to use in preference to flying or just taking a normal train. Sure, that might change in the future, but the Wright Brothers didn't spend the GBP of a large country creating their first aircraft hoping it would be an instant hit.

    14. Re:Good on him by torkus · · Score: 2

      Your post reads exactly like so many others around the first several self-driving car competitions.

      If memory servers not a single entry finished the course in the first competition or two. Everyone thought it was either stupid or impossible except those who went ahead and made it work anyhow.

      Now you can buy a Tesla (oh, look at the coincidence) that includes the tech for full self driving, pending some further software enhancements.

      Will it work? Who knows...but I certainly wouldn't discount it because in the first try EVER didn't have any resounding success.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    15. Re: Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have they actually reused one of their rockets yet? Once? How many times so far?

    16. Re:Good on him by TheSync · · Score: 1

      If he really wanted to improve US transportation he'd invest in some 200+mph railways that europe and japan have had for decades which have pretty much killed off a lot of short distance air routes.

      It is a far longer drive from LA Union Station to SpaceX than LAX to SpaceX...

    17. Re:Good on him by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      The hyper loop is certainly a better idea than the current train to nowhere, though I admit that's not a high standard to clear.

    18. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of the stuff your talking about is in the first 10 ft or so of the ground, tunnel Boring machines tend to be quite a bit deeper than most of those utilities. And mining is quite different from tunneling. In mining you're removing as much of the desired material (coal, copper, etc) as possible with little regard for the long term stability of the ground, in fact you generally hope that it will collapse after you're done. In tunneling however you're removing as little material as possible to do what you need and then stabilizing the heck out of the tunnel. TBMs by the way could definitely do with some improvement, at present they're one time use machines that are custom built for the desired job (IE very expensive/unreliable).

    19. Re:Good on him by PPalmgren · · Score: 2

      Honestly, it doesn't matter if the tunnel ideas themselves are profitable. Phase 1 (make a better Bore) will make enough money on its own even if phase 2 never pans out, and Phase 1 is a very low cost risk by comparison. The key phrase in the interview is "Tunnel technology is older than rockets, and boring speeds are pretty much what they were 50 years ago."

      Musk appears to be an efficiency hound above all else. Find something that sucks but has room for efficiency gains, make it better, and make money on it. He's done it with electric cars, batteries, and rockets so far. Making a better bore isn't that far-fetched. Making things more efficient in the right manner almost always leads to being cost competitive.

    20. Re:Good on him by MattskEE · · Score: 2

      I don't agree or disagree with your characterization of Hyperloop's true costs and risks because I'm not familiar enough with technical details, and because of that I'm curious what your basis is for your assertions.

      You're using the "analysis by analogy" approach, where you say that this is the largest vacuum vessel ever built, and that there are some unspecified safety costs, and that together these necessitate quantum leap of vacuum or structurual technology to solve. Vacuum pumps and structural tech currently seem pretty well developed so counting on vast improvements here seems risky.

      Do you mean improvements are needed to the vacuum pumps, or construction of tubes that can sustain a shallow vacuum? And what specifically is deficient in current structural technology?

      Musk has often cautioned that a first principals analysis is much better than the analogy-based approach, which is largely what led him to his work with both Tesla and SpaceX. What is inherently hard about creating large vacuum vessels? These are not ultra high vacuum which requires careful selection of materials, cleaning, baking, multiple stages of vacuum pumps, etc. In fact Hyperloop depends on a rarefied atmosphere for lift, not a full vacuum. The tech, as Musk has stated, is largely similar to pipeline construction, i.e. a steel tube built in sections which are welded together by a robotic welder.

      I don't think it's settled either way, but it's risky to make such confident assertions unless you have genuine experience in these fields, which you haven't stated one way or another.

    21. Re:Good on him by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "NASA spec pressure vessels"? Air pressure at sea level is only 14.7 psi, which is what's needed to hold a complete vacuum, and Hyperloop doesn't need a perfect clean vacuum.

    22. Re:Good on him by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering about who owns the land he's digging under. I own a few pieces of property and that includes things under the surface. In the states this is pretty common. I'm the last person to want regulation or rules to get in the way of doing something cool and innovative but... does he have the legal right to extract the contents under each of those tracts of land in order to bore a hole and to build a commercial enterprise through that land?

    23. Re:Good on him by Goldsmith · · Score: 2

      Almost agree with you here. Basic research funding is very high compared to the funding for commercializing that research. Government run basic research funding in USA is larger than the combined amount of Angel and VC funding, despite commercialization being more expensive per project.

      I'm a scientist, and there is a huge backlog of great ideas across many disciplines. Per capita, we start fewer businesses now than at any point in the last 30+ years.

      The larger investment community is addicted to easy wins based solely on scale and low technical risk development (i.e. software). Musk is showing that there's still profit for new hardware plays, even with difficult development.

    24. Re:Good on him by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a dose of realism helps. His hyperloop would require the longest tunnel ever built by a significant margin, NASA spec pressure vessels and motors that can function in a vacuum and some as yet undecided method of evacuating people from shuttle in a vacuum.

      An in attempting to construct it we the human race are going to learn a lot. Even if it fails it will be a success. You seem to want to skip the "research" part and just jump straight into development with the bounded knowledge of what we have researched in the past.

    25. Re:Good on him by green1 · · Score: 1

      Does your property REALLY include the things under the surface? In most of the world it does not. Read the fine print on your title.

    26. Re:Good on him by Kiuas · · Score: 1

      Your post reads exactly like so many others around the first several self-driving car competitions.

      If you read it that way you did not understand it. The difference is the problems faced by self-driving car development are computational. The people who said:'oh cars can could never drive themselves' were essentially arguing 'oh compuers can never handle all the variables' and so on. Because of Moore's law etc. those who were up to dat on the progress of computing knew that this wouldn't be the case going ahead, as we're now starting to see.

      The problems faced by hyperloop are not computational, they're cost-benefit oriented. Given enough money, the hyperloop could surely be implemented already, even though the cost would be at or beyond space-program levels. Building vacuum tubes and maintaining them against leaks and other safety dangers is not something we can project will become masively cheaper to do in the near future. The cost estimates hyperloop itself thus far has presented assume for example zero maintenance costs and so on. The cost calculations are not even 'optimistic', they're simply wrong.

      With self-driving cars the argument to be made for them could be constructed even way back 10-15 years ago by noting the obvious fact that computers are getting smaller, cheapr and more efficient at a relatively steady pace. The same is not true for the kind of tech required by hyperloop to work at the cost-ranges that they've been using in their plans and presentations,

      Will it work? Who knows...but I certainly wouldn't discount it because in the first try EVER didn't have any resounding success.

      I am not rejecting them based on the failed first test. I'm not rejecting the concept at all. I'm rejecting the economic feasibility of the concept based on the fact that the instances behind Hyperloop have not presented any kind of data which would lead me to believe they're even at the beginning stages of starting to solve the engineering obstacles required to get to the price-point they've been advertising. The test is just an example of these issues. Like I said: if there are major breakthroughs in vacuum technology or so on, things may be different. But right now they're holding pod-design contests for student teams when they do not even have solutions for building the tube itself at costs levels they're claiming they can get to, nor any plans on how to get there.

      If these change, I will gladly change my mind, hyperloop would be a cool thing. But all fact considered, it so far remains economically speaking a pipe-dream.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    27. Re:Good on him by butchersong · · Score: 1

      My family made quite a bit of money on coal and oil royalties when I was a kid. Right now oil companies are re-leasing mineral rights from everyone in my county on 5 year leases to the tune of about $800 an acre plus a percentage of oil revenue from what is extracted and that is thousands of feet underground not the 50 Eli is talking about. Of course, I don't think I can stop someone from drilling across my land, I would just be owed money if they did.

    28. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does in many parts of America, but by no means all.

    29. Re: Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have they actually reused one of their rockets yet? Once? How many times so far?

      They have reused one of their rockets a grand total of zero times.

    30. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VC point is a great one. If he were a VC he would have backed more outright failures. He can take chances, if one fails it won't bury him. Couldn't resist.

    31. Re:Good on him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny that you use this argument. But I can honestly state as engineer that my answer to the hyperloop design challenge is: hell yeah lets give it a go.

      Usually our hands are tied behind our back by management. At the same time 99% of the new/interesting things come from when we rebel against management. At the same time most of us like doing big things with insane prospects.

      If you wish to motivate a competent team of engineers then do this: Make sure health and safety officials are banned from the lab and machine shop floor. Good coffee machine. Big wad of cash. And ban the word cost effective. The latter is important because we often spend more time in meetings than actually doing our job, which ends up costing more then just trying things out ironically.

    32. Re:Good on him by HuguesT · · Score: 2

      Technically the Shuttle was a reusable rocket, so we know it works.

      Reusable conventional rockets are an interesting concept. Engineers at NASA and ESA thought it would not be economical. NASA and ESA use a small number of large engines each time they send one of their rocket up, and so reusing them means firing one of the large engine for a long time (which damages them and requires significant amounts of fuel that would have been otherwise used to put satellite into orbit). A SpaceX rocket uses a large number of small engines, so letting one fire for longer in order to retrieve all the others makes more sense. Nonetheless these engines spend more time in space and experience a reentry, which may damage them.

      AFAIK SpaceX hasn't yet tried to reuse any of the retrieved engine. They already have a less-than-stellar safety record so that is not surprising. I suspect the road to effective return on investment on the reusable rocket venture may be longer than anticipated.

       

  5. When is the IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I use my iPhone in the tunnel?

    1. Re:When is the IPO by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Can I use my Android phone in the tunnel?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re: When is the IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I use my Sailfish phone in the tunnel?

    3. Re: When is the IPO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I use my motorola phone in the tunnel?

    4. Re: When is the IPO by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Will my tin cans and string work in the tunnel?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  6. Serial Entrepreneur by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Typical - get a big idea, get resources together to make it happen, get it off the ground and running, then loose interest. On to the next big idea.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As long as you leave other competent people in charge of the project, that's not necessarily a bad thing.

    2. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that's "loose interest" as opposed to "tight interest"? I don't get it.

    3. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least he's able to get things started and then bring in the people to see his projects to fruition. SpaceX is moving along nicely. Tesla cars are on the roads. If only 50% of his projects take-off he's doing well.

      We need innovative people like him to really shake things up, even if he does get bored and move on to something else before his projects fully reach completion.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    4. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      The problem is that, we have innovative people. We have very wealthy people. Finding those who fit in both those categories is difficult. There are thousands of people with the next Big Thing, but because their product isn't advertising or analytics (read, more ways to spy on the user), their stuff is ignored by VCs. There are well to do people, but for the most part, they are purely interested in the next Vertu offering or what Bugatti is making next... and extremely few are even interested in doing anything that would make anyone but themselves better off.

    5. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't even spell "lose". How does your life stack up against Musk's? What are your achievements compared to his? Envy is the ulcer of the soul (said Socrates, who you doubtless regard as an untalented nobody).

    6. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by ranton · · Score: 2

      Typical - get a big idea, get resources together to make it happen, get it off the ground and running, empower others to complete your work, then lose interest. On to the next big idea.

      FTFY

      If only there were more successful serial entrepreneurs in the world. We would have our flying cars by now.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    7. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Except that they don't. Apart from their batteries, they have created exactly nothing that is fully functional or immediately useful (not that it has stopped them from bringing their half-baked cookies to market).They are a ludicrously well-funded high school science fair project, and it's really getting old. Just go away, Elon, you've cried wolf enough. Even Google, the kings of vapor and abandonware are going, 'WTF?'. I feel for young people that don't know what the world was like before the rise of clowns like Musk. You absolutely *should* demand better. He isn't brilliant, just surrounded by sycophants like all the others. Simply put: he's definitely unhinged, and he is a loser.

    8. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you say that Google are useless. Musk is a loser. But you, sir, are both.

    9. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by ranton · · Score: 2

      There are thousands of people with the next Big Thing, but because their product isn't advertising or analytics (read, more ways to spy on the user), their stuff is ignored by VCs.

      Considering how much valuations of these companies are ballooning in recent years, it seems VCs are getting pretty desperate with finding companies worth investing in. I doubt there is this massive pool of people with truly marketable and executable ideas that simply cannot find funding. Nearly everyone has some idea they think could make millions, but having an investable idea is far different than that.

      If your contention is that we need to be spending more money on basic research which is unlikely to pay off for many decades then I completely agree with you. But that is primarily the responsibility of government not private investors.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    10. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am certain that Musk has access to tens of billions of dollars worth of financing and bonds, should he need it. He is a venture capitalists wet dream, but why would Musk want to give equity away in exchange for a mere loan, when he has better options available?

    11. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lose, why can't you remember this?

    12. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      You mean like Apple and its amazing innovations in the last few years? /s

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    13. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by, "primarily the responsibility of government not private investors" you mean, "what only governments seem to realize is important and has a high ROI" then sure.

    14. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by ranton · · Score: 2

      If by, "primarily the responsibility of government not private investors" you mean, "what only governments seem to realize is important and has a high ROI" then sure.

      Most investors don't have 50 years to wait for their investments to pay off. I'm only in my 30's and would be considered a long term investor, but I still need my retirement investments to be fairly liquid in 30 years. Probably more like 20 years so I can start re-balancing to a lower risk portfolio.

      It is not the fault of short sighted investors that they won't invest in basic research. It really is something that is most suited for institutions that have the luxury of planning 50 years ahead instead of just 20. Sadly our governments rarely think 50 years ahead anymore.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    15. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's exactly what he meant.
      You leave COMPETENT people in charge.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    16. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a looser

    17. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You can either talk people down or rise to their level.
      Think well before you choose.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    18. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a shred of evidence that Tesla or SpaceX are acting like "abandoned" companies? It's not like they need the magic of Musk's micromanagement, and otherwise they just become ordinary.

    19. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want some peanut butter with your jelly there champ?

    20. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has he lost interest in? He isnt Google...

    21. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by minogully · · Score: 3, Interesting

      for once, I can't tell if the spelling mistake should be corrected by adding an "n" or removing an "o" to "loose".

    22. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why they have nanny's and wet nurses.

    23. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Jinker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't get it. I see teslas on the road almost daily here in the frozen north. I can only imagine there's more in warmer climes and where there's more luxury cars on the road. They have some of the highest customer satisfaction levels for any car. They flat out outperform the competition in many regards. He built a better mousetrap, but instead of a mousetrap it was a multi billion dollar project to launch some of the most complicated consumer hardware people can purchase into an extremely mature competitive environment.

      Whether or not Tesla survives or wins in the car sector, other manufacturers have been forced to respond to the market disruption.

      Calling him a failure seems like an ad hominem attack, really.

    24. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can either talk people down or rise to their level.

      Well the first one is much easier, so...kind of a no-brainer.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    25. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was joking about.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    26. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well maybe if it wasn't illegal to crowd source investors through something like Kickstarter it would be easier to start a new business. (This law may have changed recently)

    27. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      At least he's able to get things started and then bring in the people to see his projects to fruition.

      And that's what a serial entrepreneur does. Building a business is one skill set. Running a business is another skill set. Not everyone has both, or the desire to have both.

      It's not necessarily a bad thing, however, sometimes the older businesses flounder if the president is more interested in the new thing.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    28. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is SpaceX with its reusable rocket vapor ware?

    29. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing headphone jack?

    30. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you pay a high price for something, you tell your self it's worth it, otherwise you have to admit to yourself your an idiot!

      Humans will avoid admitting to themselves that they are an idiot.

      It does not actually mean the product is good, just that it costs a lot and idiots bought it, iphone prime example!

      you just have to look at Trump voters commenting on the car crash press conferences where it is 100% clear trump lied and yet they still call it wonderful.

    31. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Yes; he looses technology into the world.

    32. Re: Serial Entrepreneur by michael_wojcik · · Score: 2

      when you pay a high price for something, you tell your self [sic] it's worth it, otherwise you have to admit to yourself your [sic] an idiot!

      Care to cite a methodologically-sound study that shows a high correlation between price and consumer satisfaction for automobiles?

      Surveys suggest there isn't one. Last year, the highest-rated brand was luxury Lincoln, but number two was Honda, and Toyota outranked its luxury marque Lexus. For that matter, Honda's luxury line Acura was the lowest-scoring brand in the survey.

      If people did feel compelled to defend their choice to pay more for a luxury brand, then they should rate Acuras (largely just rebadged Hondas) higher than the cheaper equivalent Honda models. They don't - quite the reverse.

      The profit margins on Tesla autos indicate that they're not Veblen goods, so people aren't buying them simply for conspicuous consumption. Tesla unit profit margins are pretty good - around 19% - but they benefit from selling directly rather than through dealers (who take a cut, and who discount cars from their MSRP to get sales). Of course selling directly isn't an unalloyed benefit (which is why other manufacturers aren't doing it); it means lower volume, so less economy of scale and less market penetration.

      Indeed it appears that, as with many commodity goods, consumers generally treat car prices as signaling quality, and are therefore more likely to be more critical of expensive models.

      I'm no fan of the Tesla vehicles - they're completely unsuited to my needs, and I'm not impressed by gadgets and technological gee-whiz features that offer little benefit. But independent reviews suggest that at least some Tesla models are indeed quite good, for the use cases they satisfy.

    33. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Removing headphone jack?

      The only people who care about that won't buy Apple Phones, and are pissed off they took lead out of gasoline, LED light bulbs, And anything other than coal generated electricity.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not the fault of short sighted investors that they won't invest in basic research. It really is something that is most suited for institutions that have the luxury of planning 50 years ahead instead of just 20. Sadly our governments rarely think 50 years ahead anymore.

      You seem to be unaware of a few things. Self-government being one.

      The fact that all the nice "bankers" and "investors" and "real estate" people...are simply siphoning off of the credit of the nation, loaning it back to people and "the government"

      Modern "money" and "investments" is nothing more than:

      1) issue mortgage against your neighbor's property without telling them
      2) loan money from the mortgage back to your neighbor
      3) profit

      there is no "government" not for a long time. there is pseudo-private (government enforced) parasitic "banking" satanists running the show.

      news flash: if the "investors" decide to parasitically enslave everyone, including "the government" then YES IT IS THEIR PROBLEM WHERE THAT MONEY IS GOING TO (OR NOT). IT IS THEIR PROBLEM.

      noone is responsible for anyone else...you ARE responsible if you rape/enslave/commit violence against someone else.

      why is this so hard for business corporate and banking and investment types to understand?

      you have no "government" the criminals run EVERYTHING TOP TO BOTTOM.

      http://www.annavonreitz.com/fortheboys.pdf
      http://www.mindserpent.com/American_History/federal/fed_res/banking_books/The_Borrower_Should_Repay_the_Lender-Tom_Schauf.pdf
      http://www.svpvril.com/OACL.html

      it is the problem of "investors" and anyone in "finances" that such inland piracy (that is what it literally is at this stage, and slavery) goes on and on...never a word.....

      "the government" LOL. you destroyed that long ago.

    35. Re:Serial Entrepreneur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why they have nanny's and wet nurses.

      And "love children" and divorce lawyers

  7. ...why not troll ACME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They sold Instant Hole kits, I think.

    1. Re: ...why not troll ACME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Super Genius

  8. lol @ Headline by Notabadguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    (Read this in a news anchor's voice)

    Breaking news!

    In an effort to prevent the internet from calling him a fucking retard for posting a story on Slashdot like "Elon Musk is boring,' MsMash followed up the Bloomberg story with the note, "the story is funny and insightful" in an effort to direct viewer opinions. No word yet on whether the attempt to sway public opinion has had any effect, but we'll follow this story to find out."

    By the way, 100 marks to Notabadguy for the comment, which is as funny as it is insightful. No need for you fellow readers to decide for yourself, spend those karma points as directed.

  9. New business opportunity by loranger · · Score: 1

    There is an opportunity for a business who can vertically integrate boring machine design and operation. This whole boring business run just like it was running in the XIXth century; he probably foresaw a significant headroom for disruptive technological improvement.

  10. Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by getuid() · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's already going to space.

    If he gets to build up digging know-how, he'll be the first to actually make a shitload of money off asteroid mining.

    Best part: r&d possibly largelgy paid for by public money (first NASA, and maybe now he can acceds some infrastructure funds or public contracting for the boring part)... That's one hell of a way to hack the system. Go him! :-)

    1. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Robotbeat · · Score: 2

      Much more money in building a mega telecommunications satellite constellation in low Earth orbit, which SpaceX has been working on for years now. You have 7 billion potential customers. The market for platinum group metals (even if you were able to get as much as you wanted) is globally much smaller and lower value than telecommunications.

    2. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      Taxpayer money actually being used for something useful. Also, terraforming mars may prove to save our collective asses back here at home as we continue to screw up the atmosphere. Taxpayer money well spent.

    3. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by sherr · · Score: 2

      Sorry, that's just silly. No matter how much we screw up the atmosphere, the Earth will never be as inhospitable as Mars is. Any terraforming we could possibly apply to Mars could be applied to Earth easier. It could possibly save mankind from total annihilation from nuclear war, but nothing short of that.

    4. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Maritz · · Score: 1

      It sounds more like he's suggesting terraforming technology developed for Mars could be used on Earth. Not something that is likely to happen tbh, Mars doesn't have the mass or magnetic field needed to hold on to an atmosphere, regardless of its composition.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    5. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Any terraforming we could possibly apply to Mars could be applied to Earth easier.

      There are a lot of options that would require an entire planet being uninhabitable during the process. How would that be easier to do on Earth?

    6. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by swb · · Score: 4, Informative

      The digging machines might be useful on Mars.

      It almost becomes "Red Mars" if you can put robotic tunneling machines on the planet and create large tunnel galleries ahead of time.

      Once people get there, the exterior holes can be plugged with a few airlocks and then pressurized with a breathable atmosphere. Tunneled structures will give you protections from the atmosphere, meteorites and radiation.

    7. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      If he gets to build up digging know-how, he'll be the first to actually make a shitload of money off asteroid mining.

      The hard part of asteroid mining isn't so much the digging...or even the space part. It's the separating and concentrating. On Earth the minerals we mine were concentrated by eons of geological, hydrological, volcanic and biological processes, none of which took place on a dead asteroid. So, yeah, there's trillions of tons of platinum in them thar asteroids! There's an atom of it over there, and atom over there, an atom over there...

      I have no idea how to solve that problem. Seems like some kind of chemical engineering problem, or a nanoscale engineering problem of sifting and sorting and combining pulverized dust.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    8. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      If we get to the point where we can geo-engineer Mars to be livable by humans, I'm pretty sure we can fix what we've done to Earth as well.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    9. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 2

      So we just take asteroids or some moons (Jupiter and Saturn have plenty, after all) and shove them into Mars. Foolproof solution! /s

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    10. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by lgw · · Score: 1

      Force majeure: thermal energy is easy in space. A big sheet of Mylar in a vaguely parabolic shape, and you get temps near the surface of the sun. The hard problem is how to cool the liquid platinum when you're done.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easy, if you don't care much about how long it takes to cool. Just reposition the big Mylar sheet to shade the molten platinum you want to cool, and let thermal radiation do the rest.

    12. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The hard part of asteroid mining isn't so much the digging...or even the space part. It's the separating and concentrating. On Earth the minerals we mine were concentrated by eons of geological, hydrological, volcanic and biological processes, none of which took place on a dead asteroid.

      You don't just pick up any old rock. You prioritize the very best ones.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pulverize+magnets gets you every metal
      Or heating it to melting point and separating liquids, but that's more delicate and less fun than exploding asteroids.

    14. Re:Son of a b... he's got a world domination plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered what the environmental lobby would say about irreparably destroying the Mars (or lunar) landscape. I think as soon as Musk proposes the idea, there would be protests in the streets about "Keep Mars Pristine", and the UN would declare all extraterrestrial planets as protected nature reserves.

  11. I thought he was trolling Boeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Boeing Company
    The Boring Company

    1. Re: I thought he was trolling Boeing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boeing is not boring it's so the planes bounce instead of crash.

  12. Bastard by puddingebola · · Score: 2

    Stole my idea.

    1. Re:Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a similar thought, but the difference between Musk and me is that Musk is a doer and I'm a ... guy who posts on Slashdot. I was never going to do anything about my boring ideas. Musk might.

      In my picture of how boring should work, you wouldn't grind the way boring machines do now. You'd drill and blast. The reason why this is so slow is that nobody has automated a scout/drill/blast/clear/sap cycle. If you got humans got out of the tunnels and basically steered AI-controlled instruments that needed guidance only when the geology got interesting or something broke, the cycle could speed up by two orders of magnitude, maybe more. We probably don't need much more theoretical work for figuring out the optimal orientation of the drill holes and blast charges. We might benefit slightly from better sensors that can scout out the geology a few meters ahead - whether there are fractures, differences in density, water, etc. Ideally, the AI system would have a decent n-layer neural network with back-propagation, which makes predictions before each blast and compares them with results afterwards. Each blast would then also be a bit of AI training data.

      I imagine that the clearing phase might have more blasts to reduce the size of any freed-up rocks that would be hard to remove. Or maybe, it could figure out an optimal way to fracture those rocks with jackhammers. The clearing and loading phase could also be done by AI machines with AI-driven dump trucks cycling through the finished parts of the tunnel.

      Early versions of the system would probably have remote human "drivers" for most of the instruments, but their work would serve to train the AI that could increasingly supplement their work and eventually just take over. And then we could have our hyperloop going though tunnels.

    2. Re:Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ridiculously powerful laser and a means to quickly remove molten rock from the path?

    3. Re:Bastard by Rei · · Score: 1

      When I heard Musk was getting into boring, my mind immediately jumped to: rocket engines. Either to throw abrasives or for simple thermal spall.

      If you want to channel a lot of energy in a short period of time at a surface, you can't beat a rocket. Now, getting it to do what you want, and not destroy your hardware, that's the challenge... ;)

      --
      I spent the evening flickering into your darkness.
    4. Re:Bastard by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      If you want to channel a lot of energy in a short period of time at a surface, you can't beat a rocket.

      Well that, or explosives...

    5. Re:Bastard by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      And just imagine, if you could take the energy of a nuclear reactor, and release it all at once!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    6. Re:Bastard by lgw · · Score: 1

      1/10 for practicality.
      10/10 for awesome.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  13. I hope he's ready by JWW · · Score: 1

    I hope he's ready for the protests he's going to encounter when he tries to bore under Lake Oahe....

  14. Where is he.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that he can legally start digging without a permit?

    Living in California myself, I can guarantee you most city/county, and possibly state level laws regarding this state that more than 1 foot of change in elevation, or a retaining wall of more than 3 feet in height requires a building permit, irregardless of any 'actual' construction efforts being done beyond that.

    While it is entirely possible he has enough money to make this happen without anybody raising the above rules to him, it seems like a prime place for someone to set an example of what is and isn't acceptable behavior whether a 'backyard contractor' or a multibillionaire.

    Anyways if he gets away with it, time for me to start on my tunnel down to my underground bunker, because who is going to notice unless it collapsed and killed me?

    1. Re:Where is he.... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you have made your tunnel before building your underground bunker?

      For that matter, how did you build your underground bunker in the first place?!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Where is he.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has a team of expensive lawyers, he just ran it by them, and asked them to get any necessary clearances from the relevant authorities.

      At least, that is how I would approach the problem if I was a billionaire,

    3. Re:Where is he.... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The city of Hawthorne loves him... so as long as he complies with the stormwater management requirements he should be fine, and should have been able to get an over the counter permit. They might stop him if it goes to far... but I somehow doubt it.

      What I don't get is where the innovation in boring would come from. I understand the inefficiencies or grinding rock to a pulp to simplify handling; I think I get the limits of semi-serial process of a TBM; logically I can imagine there are better ways than using a monolithic cutter head; and practically I get that ellipses are better than circles for many applications... but angled cutter heads have been done before.

      I remember the conspiracy theory stories about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subterrene"> subterrene </a>, but... well... maybe he knows something... I didn't think the thermodynamics worked on that one though.

    4. Re:Where is he.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "What I don't get is where the innovation in boring would come from."

      Rapid prototyping, which is kind of SpaceXs whole thing. There is a video on Youtube where a NASA tech described his experience with the advantages of their methodologies when he was working with them on a PICA manufacturing process. A lot of companies try to design something in detail first then build it. SpaceX however tends to quickly build prototype after prototype until they reach the final device. The NASA tech said that even with massive resources it probably would have taken them twice as long to what SpaceX was able to do in a few months.

    5. Re:Where is he.... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Thanks; in addition to that, improved analytics is likely, for wear monitoring, stresses, performance, and software to help transition faster in changing soil types would also be reasonable sources for innovation. I guess it is reasonable that he could improve the economics of boring by a factor of 1.5-2 and do a lot to materially achieve his stated goals... and 4-5 might be reasonable with enough effort.

  15. Concieving versus revealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The idea began on a Saturday morning a few weeks ago...

    I'd be willing to be it began considerably before that. That was just the rollout.

  16. We need more people like Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He draws a lot of criticism on Slashdot for his publicity-generating statements, and his extremely ambitious engineering goals.

    I think history will regard him as one of the great engineers. Nikola Tesla, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, the Wright brothers and many more were frequently derided as "crackpots" and "frauds" during their lifetimes. Now their achievements are revered.

    Musk has already succeeded commercially with SpaceX and Tesla (and others), and who would really bet against his continuing success? Still, there will always be people who mock him and belittle his achievements to date.

    1. Re: We need more people like Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's inventions aren't really revered. He turned into a crackpot halfway through his career. Internet crackpots do indeed revere him. But books about him are sold on the same remainder tables at the bookstores as the illustrated histories of Madame Blavatsky and Alestar Crowley.

  17. Dan Simmons' Hyperion Cantos by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only one who thought of the Labyrinthine Worlds of Simmons' Hyperion Cantos.

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  18. I love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the smell of Musk in the mornin'.

  19. What got Elon moving was employee safety by Robotbeat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not mentioned in the summary is the fact that what got Elon moving on this idea was when some of his SpaceX employees were hit by a car crossing the street to their parking structure:

    "A news report about three SpaceX employees who were hit by a car on Dec. 17 after leaving work. The incident occurred at 2:15 a.m. About three hours later, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk posted the following Tweets:
    @elonmusk Traffic is driving me nuts. Am going to build a tunnel boring machine and just start digging..."

    SpaceX has been trying to get a pedestrian bridge built there for a long time, but haven't been able to get permission from the city (blame NIMBYism or just bureaucracy). But with the tunnel, they're able to start digging down without permits on their own land (still need permission once they start digging under the street, of course).

    1. Re:What got Elon moving was employee safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A news report about three SpaceX employees who were hit by a car on Dec. 17 after leaving work. The incident occurred at 2:15 a.m"

      Maybe they shouldn't be working until 2:15 am.

    2. Re:What got Elon moving was employee safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A news report about three SpaceX employees who were hit by a car on Dec. 17 after leaving work. The incident occurred at 2:15 a.m"

      Maybe they shouldn't be working until 2:15 am.

      Replying to myself here...

      On second thought, I suppose there should be MUCH less traffic in the middle of the night. Also, SpaceX operates multiple shifts for rocket manufacturing, so it makes sense there would be people there at that time.

    3. Re:What got Elon moving was employee safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose there should be MUCH less traffic in the middle of the night.

      2:15 am? Less traffic, sure, but it's drunk hour.

    4. Re:What got Elon moving was employee safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can we please not blame the victims automatically?

    5. Re:What got Elon moving was employee safety by Shatrat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they're in some kind of operational role that has to be staffed 24/7? Maybe you're in some kind of basement role that is less critical?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:What got Elon moving was employee safety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of people work until 2:15 *voluntarily* because of the potential reward. I've done this twice in my life on a regular basis--school and one startup. It was worth it. I would do it again for the right company.

  20. Boring by ebcdic · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Yellow Pages here used to have an entry for Boring: "See civil engineers".

  21. Fifth Duke of Portland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elon Musk must be the reincarnation of the Fifth Duke of Portland. {Building a lot of tunnels under his land}

    1. Re:Fifth Duke of Portland by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Elon Musk must be the reincarnation of the Fifth Duke of Portland. {Building a lot of tunnels under his land}

      Isn't he the crazy homeless guy who peed in the reservoir? The city, being Portland, saw fit to drain the entire lake after finding this out.

  22. First example of an anti-clickbait headline? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Musk makes vague claims of having a new tunneling technology, but does he really have a fundamentally faster TBM?

    1. Re:First example of an anti-clickbait headline? by Robotbeat · · Score: 2

      He doesn't claim to already have new tunneling tech. He's just done some back of the envelope, first-principles calculations to show it should be possible in theory to go much faster. Typical Musk.

      So does he have a faster TBM right now? Definitely not. It'll be interesting to see if he develops one, though. I suspect just reducing the man-power and increasing the up-time would give a significant boost to performance-to-cost, though. Europeans usually require a lot fewer workers for a similar TBM project than Americans do. Don't know why that is. (Or you can also think of it the other way around: for a given number of workers, you can get a lot more tunneling done, thus making tunneling cheaper and more appealing, thus increasing the number of tunneling projects you can afford to do.)

    2. Re:First example of an anti-clickbait headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While additional speed would be nice it isn't necessarily the biggest factor. Reliability and cost are much bigger issues with current TBMs, many are falling apart by the time they finish their tunnel, and in a lot of cases they have two running because one wouldn't be able to do the entire tunnel without disintegrating.

    3. Re:First example of an anti-clickbait headline? by munch117 · · Score: 1

      Europeans usually require a lot fewer workers for a similar TBM project than Americans do. Don't know why that is.

      Labour costs. We automate the shit out of things because labour is expensive. You won't find many valet parkers or doormen in Western Europe either. Not to mention Walmart greeters. Are those for real? How is it possible that a discount store can afford to pay someone to mostly just stand around? It boggles my mind to think of the income disparity that makes such a job possible. What do those people get paid?

    4. Re:First example of an anti-clickbait headline? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't claim to already have new tunneling tech. He's hasn't even done some back of the envelope, first-principles calculations to show it should be possible in theory to go much faster. Typical Musk.

      Fixed that for you.

    5. Re:First example of an anti-clickbait headline? by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

      Europeans usually require a lot fewer workers for a similar TBM project than Americans do. Don't know why that is.

      Labour costs. We automate the shit out of things because labour is expensive. You won't find many valet parkers or doormen in Western Europe either.
      Not to mention Walmart greeters. Are those for real? How is it possible that a discount store can afford to pay someone to mostly just stand around? It boggles my mind to think of the income disparity that makes such a job possible. What do those people get paid?

      "Greeter" is just a euphemism for "person who watches the door to make sure people don't shoplift stuff."

  23. This decade's P.T. Barnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all Musk is. With a healthy dose of sociopathy scooped on top instead of charm.

  24. 50 feet? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Here in Seattle we've had some tunnel boring going on over the past few years - and, based on experience, I believe our tunnelers will tell you there are lots of man-made obstacles deeper down than that.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:50 feet? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Good thing he's not digging in Seattle!

    2. Re:50 feet? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      You might also have mentioned that your Seattle highway 99 tunnel is on its way to running about $2,000,000,000 a mile .. for two lanes in each direction. There's no reason to believe that auto tunnels under L.A. will be any cheaper. Hyperloop tunnels -- presumably a lot smaller in diameter -- might be a lot cheaper ... maybe ...

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    3. Re:50 feet? by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      You might also have mentioned that your Seattle highway 99 tunnel is on its way to running about $2,000,000,000 a mile .. for two lanes in each direction.

      The actual figure for Seattle is half that: $1b/mile for the tunnel. (more precisely, $2.1 billion for a nearly-two-mile tunnel).

      http://www.seattletimes.com/se...

    4. Re:50 feet? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Ahem, no. 1.7 miles, 3.37 Billion as of June 2016 http://www.seattletimes.com/se.... With a number of outstanding lawsuits that will likely push final costs higher.

      BTW, costs of Boston's "Big Dig" were probably in the same ballpark (total somewhere between 15B and 24B depending on who does the math) or higher although it's a more complex project and it's difficult to come up with a comparable cost per mile..

      Tunnels under cities can apparently be kind of EXPENSIVE.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:50 feet? by ljw1004 · · Score: 1

      Ahem, no. 1.7 miles, 3.37 Billion as of June 2016 http://www.seattletimes.com/se....

      Did you read the link I posted? It was six months more recent than yours, and from the same Seattle Times news source, and had the headline "taxpayers rejoice! Bertha progress cuts into cost overruns."

      Also the $3.37b you quoted is for the entire Highway99 replacement plan: $1b of that was for non-tunnel parts of the plan.

      So: cost overruns reduced $3.37b down to $3.1b, of which $1b is for non-tunnel parts, so the tunnel cost is $2.1b. For a 1.7mile tunnel that's $1.2b/mile.

  25. Who owns the mineral rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that the folks whose property Musk is burrowing under/through have a bit of a say in whether or not he can do this.

    I thought that Cali's mineral rights were pretty much sewn up at this point... viz the nodding donkeys everywhere.

  26. Fortune of the day ... by BESTouff · · Score: 1

    Fortune of the day, just at the bottom of the /. page:
    "I am more bored than you could ever possibly be. Go back to work."
    (emphasis is mine)

  27. Cabin Fever by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

    Sounds like he's got cabin fever. I give him credit for seeing that our current transportation systems we eventually drive us into another Dark age. Our current transportation system is like a 911 event every 10 days. The answer is simple. A autonomous track system that has utilities built into it, using autonomous personal vehicles.

    1. Re: Cabin Fever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The solution is always simple:

      A huge automatic mechanism, with automatic everything. Did I mention it needs to be huge and all encompassing? And automatic?

      Well then, lets get on it!

    2. Re: Cabin Fever by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      The main problem is human error. It's linked to human ego.

  28. Mahars by unapersson · · Score: 1

    Time to go and catch a few Mahars.

  29. Planetary Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes sense. If I was going offworld to Mars, you need Rockets, you need vehicles and power storage that run independent of any sparse fossil resource that may or may not exist, you need habitats....and on Mars, underground tubes would be quite handy for transport and for living. At the end of the day, if Elon gets to Mars, everyone will be wearing shiny jumpsuits.

  30. Nuke powered tunnel boring machine? by exa · · Score: 1

    I WANT ONE! :D

    --
    --exa--
  31. Honeymoon is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the hate begin!

    FUCK! MUSK!

  32. [Sic] by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    Really p(h)unny, Elon. That's what sitting in jam traffic does to you, it makes the mind wander. That's why I try to get a job with less of a commute...

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:[Sic] by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Cause I don't have the money to start up ventures like Elon does. Although I'm sure my ideas are just as way out.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    2. Re:[Sic] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny story. I tried to get a job with less of a commute. Nobody else wanted me. Then I got fired for being cranky because I was tired all the time from my long commute. Now I got nothing.

  33. that is the role of visionary by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    As a visionary he needs to continue creating new companies, get them running, then move to next one...

  34. But... why? by rhazz · · Score: 1

    I'm unclear on what his edge is here, other than maybe he enjoys the idea of digging stuff? Tunnel boring is an existing market with a number of players. Will the borer also install the road? Seems more likely he's trying to cover up the installation of a secret underground lab.

    Up in Ottawa we've been digging tunnel for several years for our new light rail. The machines doing the digging are probably the least complicated part of the project. The real issue is varying soil and rock conditions and trying not to cause things like this.

    1. Re:But... why? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      But don't pressure balance TBM'S solve that part of the problem? It still takes time to change the "teeth" for those transitions (even different types of rock), but is it that big of an issue for the right equipment?

      Larger diameter holes are easier than small diameter from a logistics standpoint, but directional drilling works... with certain other inefficiencies.

      Maybe Musk would have been better served with a pedestrian bridge/tunnel over to the Metro station than that awful parking garage.

  35. Next Marvel Cineverse Villain... by mchall · · Score: 1

    ... will be Elon Musk as the Mole Man.

    1. Re:Next Marvel Cineverse Villain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Behold, the Underminer! I'm always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me! I hereby declare war on peace and happiness! Soon, all will tremble before me!" from Pixar's "The Incredibles"

  36. Like Google - except Elon actually finishes stuff by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    Google has a similar case of Corporate A.D.D. - except the "A" team hands off the project when they get about 80% done with it.

    Unfortunately, it seems like the remaining 20% is done by the interns.

  37. well... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    "...which would make it low enough to clear gas and sewer lines and to be undetectable at the surface.."

    First, you probably mean DEEP enough?

    And "undetectable at the surface" Sure - unless you nick things like the Aliso Canyon Gas Storage facility (which stores gas as far as 9000 feet down....)
    (cf https://www.washingtonpost.com...)

    Deep-tunnel digging is pretty much 90% about dealing with the unexpected, because that's the part that fucks you quickly, catastrophically, and often lethally.

    That said, I wish him the best. The only thing I see as a barrier is, as usual, the lawyers. I don't believe that the current legal regime as far as who owns/uses/profits from subterranean 'property' is anywhere near where it needs to be to cope with what he's talking about. It's very much a wild-west show, because most of the law seems to deal with MINERAL rights, not access/use rights. Can Musk tunnel 100' under my house without my permission? How about the state capital? What if he's 1000' down?

    Good luck, Elon.

    --
    -Styopa
  38. Way off by Necron69 · · Score: 2

    People take Musk's jokes too seriously. SpaceX is building a pedestrian underpass to the big SpaceX parking lot that is across a major street (Crenshaw Blvd in Hawthorne). There have been accidents, and a number of SpaceX employees have been hit by cars trying to cross the busy street.

    - Necron69

    1. Re:Way off by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Indeed, here is video of three employees walking in the crosswalk being hit by a car.

    2. Re: Way off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't he just hire a bunch of Mexicans with shovels of their own, to dig his hole?

  39. Re:He also has mild Down's Syndrome by Maritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A "mild" case of having an extra chromosome? Is that like a mild case of losing a leg?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  40. Lava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to ignore all the other things wrong with this idea and wonder what mental aberration is responsible for you thinking that there is any sense in which rocks become easier to handle when molten.

    1. Re:Lava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "I saw it in a movie once"

  41. the guy really wants to go to Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electric vehicles, rockets and now tunnels. The next thing will be hydroponics.

  42. how far down does land ownership go? by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Undetectable at just 50ft? Hardly. there are plenty of cases of people in England loosing their homes down sinkholes that appear after some old, forgotten mine hundreds or even thousands of feet down collapses after centuries.
    I find it hard to believe that in California, once you've dug 50 ft down on your own land, absolutely nothing stands in your way (other than geology) to just tunneling wherever and as far as you like.

    If I happen to own some land in CA that Musk wants to tunnel under/through, can he really do so without my permission or even knowledge?

    1. Re:how far down does land ownership go? by dffuller · · Score: 1

      Why do they loose them down the sinkholes? Is this an effort to fill them?

    2. Re:how far down does land ownership go? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Well technically they're not lost, they know exactly where they went :-)

    3. Re:how far down does land ownership go? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      If I happen to own some land in CA that Musk wants to tunnel under/through, can he really do so without my permission or even knowledge?

      Of course not. And of course he knows that. Tunneling under roads always requires the city/county/state's permission, depending on which authority is most directly responsible for the road in question, and in the case of important roads, like the interstate highways, it may require the permission of all three at once. Tunneling under private property requires either the mineral rights (in which case the owner of the surface isn't the owner of the depths anyway) or an easement from the surface owner. In the case of utilities, there's usually a public easement that has been forced upon the property owner by the government. It usually follows the road, but can also include any or all edges of everyone's property for things like cable television.

      Slashdot is so goddamned weird sometimes. Elon Musk is in the rocket business and in the automobile business, two of the most highly regulated industries in the world. He can probably quote chapter and verse of the top 10 regulations he despises, plus name multiple examples of regulations he thinks are highly appropriate. The guy knows more about government regulations than any Slashdot reader who is not actually employed as a government regulator or as a compliance officer, because he's up to his eyeballs in them day in and day out. Plus, you know, he has money, which buys lawyers. I'm absolutely certain he has three whole law firms on retainer, one for SpaceX, one for Tesla, and one for himself personally because billionaire. And when you're already paying them, you might as well ask them questions, to get some value for your money.

      So despite appearances, he's not going into this blindly. I'm sure the day he had a hole dug in his parking lot is also the day he had a lawyer down at city hall, filing the proper paperwork for a tunnel under the road to his parking structure. According to another poster, he's been trying to get a pedestrian bridge built for some time now, but for whatever reason, the city hasn't approved it. The interesting thing is it's a different department that approves tunnels. (Well, it is here, anyway. It probably is in Hawthorne too.) He's probably hoping to find a department of the city that will actually process the paperwork in a timely fashion.

  43. Tit for Tat by laing · · Score: 1

    Boeing should start a subsidiary called "SpaceD".

  44. Re:He also has mild Down's Syndrome by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Maybe he's a chimera.

  45. My Ultimate Minecraft Dream! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God Bless him. He's going to live out my ultimate Minecraft Dream!!

  46. People like Musk need to do more homework by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Solutions like this are classic examples of tech-rich people thinking they have all the answers when there's a whole bank of qualified specialist people already working in that field who know what's really needed to fix the problem but have only been stymied by politics.

    If traffic is driving Musk nuts then the solution is not to find innovative new ways to handle more traffic. The solution is to ask why is traffic so bad in the first place.

    Recommended reading: The Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jacobs

    Or if that's too heavy, try Suburban Nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream.

    Only then will you come to see the culprit: Single Use Zoning, aka the BANANA (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything) rules. Single-use zoning forces everybody to make several car journeys just to get through a typical day. Going to work? Car. Going out for lunch? Car. Going home form work? Car. Need to go out for a bottle of milk and postage stamp? Car. Going to a movie? Car.

    No bloody wonder the place is flooded with traffic. You try to build a city around the automobile and it becomes a hostile environment for pedestrians and cyclists. You try to widen roads to accommodate more cars and the laws of induced demand kick in, resulting in even more traffic and roads as choked as they were before.

    Learn a few things about urban planning, Elon. Don't arrogantly assume that you're the first person to want to address this problem. Smart growth and sustainable, walkable, transit-oriented development is a far better solution than drilling holes in the ground and cracking puns about the word "boring." It requires years of tedious work and politicking to build support for smart growth. A city is not a private company with which you can do what you like. There are elected councils, public advisory committees, public hearings, tax implications, and all manner of complex bureaucratic hoops that you have to jump through to fix these things.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how people who love high-rises and hate cars keep droning on about sprawl and the like, and never figure out why the rest of us ignore them.'

      You try to build a city around the automobile and it becomes a hostile environment for pedestrians and cyclists.

      You say that like it's a bad thing. You'll be a pit slave when Paving Day comes, while I'll be cruising the paved Earth in my atomic hypercar, under the light of the chromed moon.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, right. Enjoy your choked and congested LA hellscape. I'll stick to my compact walkable neighborhood.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your suggesting that there is no benefit whatsoever to having walk-able surface with buried transportation corridors (who said they'd all be filled with private transport anyway?) because it's all been studied before?

      OK, well I'm going to suggest that many folks will disagree with you and that it's still very much an open question.

    4. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by lgw · · Score: 1

      There will be no congestion come Paving Day! Pave the Earth!

      (Also, how very nice for you that you live in a crime free neighborhood. Presumably you're OK with the peasants suffering - let them eat cake?)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

      Glad you mentioned peasants. Low-income people are the ones who suffer the most from sprawl since many of them can't afford cars, resulting in multi-hour commutes in areas that are poorly served by public transport.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    6. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by chispito · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right. Enjoy your choked and congested LA hellscape. I'll stick to my compact walkable neighborhood.

      My neighborhood is compact and walkable, too, but that doesn't mean there are a diversity of well paying jobs there. Take Spacex for instance: are you suggesting that all of the talent they need, from highly skilled engineers to the maintenance and janitorial crews, would all live within walking distance from the company? And what about suppliers and subcontractors? Suppose you're a chemist and your wife is a pilot. Good look finding the jobs you want within walking distance.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    7. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by lgw · · Score: 1

      And you're going to have jobs for them in walking distance? Seems unlikely. No one middle class wants their maid and gardener living in the same neighborhood they do. Nor will that big-box superstore be in their neighborhood. Sound like a lots of wishful thinking.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like mixed-income blocks, one of the tenets of new urbanism and is easily found in older cities.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    9. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Um, walkable surfaces is precisely what I said is a better solution. Subway systems are great too, but they're a little useless if each transit node is a mile away from the entrance to the nearest building.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    10. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's your Utopia, enjoy. Just don't force it on others.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's building up a toolbelt of companies that will be useful on Mars. Rockets, batteries, electric vehicles, solar panels, boring, hyperloop (much less atmosphere on Mars, makes this a lot easier I would think)...

      So what's next? Large scale indoor food cultivation, powered by solar panels/batteries? A company that constructs buildings robotically?

    12. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this Musk guy sounds just like that idiot who was trying to push some online currency linked to your email - as if anyone would ever send money to other people online, just on the promise they mailed you something. And have you heard about that billionaire who thinks he can build a rocket that lands itself? What a fucking joke! He's probably watching too many geek movies, or trying to impress his geek friends. And then there's that rich dude who wanted to start a company that sells only electric cars, and actually make them in the US. Like, who's gonna make batteries for him? Geez! Oh well, if rich people want to throw away their money on geek-topia fantasy projects that could never work, I guess it's their right. Let's all just kick back and laugh at them as they inevitably fail.

    13. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So cheaper tunnel boring turns out to be a fantastic thing to enable that and you are complaining that Musk is some kind of idiot who needs to read some more books? Sounds like you just wanted to cut someone down for some reason or other.

    14. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      No, this is the way cities were built in the pre-auto era. City governments made a deliberate choice to try to build everything around the automobile and the result was catastrophic.

      There is massive pent-up demand for vibrant urban living. There's no need to "force" it on anyone.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    15. Re:People like Musk need to do more homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't arrogantly assume you know the answer to everything because your urban hippy echo chamber agrees with you and the couple books you try to use to justify the righteousness and superiority of your life choices.

      Glad you have all the answers why LA is so bad. Now explain to me why traffic is so much worse in London, Paris, Tokyo and other cities that do not have the above "culprits" you seemingly identified.

  47. The Howard Hughes of our generation? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Hopefully not. I wish him the best of luck; but if he ends up as an unkempt recluse I won't be surprised. With a little luck, maybe I can figure out where he will be hitch-hiking... or maybe not.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  48. Re:Socrates by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, Socrates is likely a fictional character made up by Plato.

  49. Re:Investing by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    That's why smart companies do basic research so that they can have something for investors 50 years down the road to invest in.

  50. The Great Underground Empire by elainerd · · Score: 1

    Your greatest challenge lies ahead-and downwards.

    --
    Faith: Belief in Truth. Superstition: Belief in Falsehood.
  51. Gravity Train by smugfunt · · Score: 1

    Combine a fast borer with the hyperloop and you could build a gravity train which can travel between stations without needing power.

  52. This future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tunnel technology is older than rockets ...

    When freeways were first proposed, some futurists saw them as being 2 or 3 storey elevated roads. I still think that would be cheaper than tunnels. By the way, the hyper-loop idea isn't new; it's just that nobody wanted to put new (well 1950s) technology inside old transport technology. Of course, the real futuristic idea was flying cars; the technology is close but we're nowhere near solving the infrastructure problems of personal flight.

  53. Re:Socrates by lgw · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, Socrates is likely a fictional character made up by Plato.

    No, he's mentioned by other contemporaries. His pedophilia was apparently a running joke in society at the time. It's really reaching to suggest that he's some sort of shared fictional character, yet different in kind from all the shared fictional characters we now know as Greek mythology.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  54. Already working. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Will it work? No idea, but at least he's trying.

    With Musk the right question is never 'will it work?" but 'will it make any sense factoring in the costs?'

    Well, at least it did made sense for several European cities that decided to have their highway bypass *underground*.

    And that not counting the huge number of cities that have their public transportation underground.

    So yeah, definitely worth a try.

    Now will Elon manage to bring something new to the table (e.g.: similar to how SpaceX brought back the idea of reusable space vessels) ?

    Or at least open a new market for some current technology?
    (e.g.: similar to how Tesla manage to introduce the north-american market - much more range-anxious than the densely populated areas (eu/japan) where electric cars where previously being deployed) (though elon Top-down instead of bottom-up approach was innovative : he went with big ranges from the beginning, while progressively building progressively cheaper (more affordable) normal-range cars (roadster -> Model S/X -> Model 3) whereas European constructor usually went for a range of normal vehicle (e.g.: the whole Zero-emission platform of Renault) with prograssively bigger batteries and better ranges (all companies ended-up meeting half-way at same price and mileage category than Model 3)

    Or will it be a giant "meh?"

    who knows ? nobody until he tries.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  55. Autopilot != Self-driving by DrYak · · Score: 2

    Note that, neither Tesla's Autopilot, nor the countless other camera/lidar based solution sold by countless other manufacturer nowadays are self-driving.

    At best, they are exactly what is called an Autopilot for planes and ships : some travelling is automated up to some level by the onboard electronic, but the vessel still must remain under the supervision of the plane's/ship's captain. (i.e.: the captain can't go take a nap. only the electronics is relieveing them from needing to mind the minute detail of piloting).
    Hence the logical name "autopilot" used by Tesla marketing. Though stupid people are stupid and somewhat mis-interpret what "autopilot" means.

    At worst, they are simply collision avoidance technologies (the driver is in full charge of steering the vehicle, but the car is able to sound an alert and to an emergency braking to avoid a crash).

    Self-driving is *still* limited to small scale experiments (google cars and similar technologies tested by startups)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  56. One Up On That by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Machinist frequently use a tool called a boring bar. You might use such a tool to bore out a rifle barrel for example. But machinist often are grumpy and drink to much at very boring bars and come to work and make mistakes when using a boring bar. And then we wonder why foreigners find English such a difficult language to learn.

  57. You are joking but it happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "mild" case of having an extra chromosome? Is that like a mild case of losing a leg?

    The effect of having a full redundant chromosome , part of one, or less than one are not the same. Then there are ring chromosome , translocations, and far more. Read up on down syndrom : while the trisomy 21 is the crushing majority of the cases, there are indeed cases with less than 1 additional complete chromosome. And there are indeed various form of the down syndrom, some being more "mild". In some case of translocation, you can even be completely normal, just your children may not be.

  58. Diversion by Steve-Oh · · Score: 1

    I swear this whole Boring company move is just a diversion to keep press attention off the lack of Tesla's performance and the Model 3 is talking longer than expected.

  59. Re:He also has mild Down's Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that like a mild case of losing a leg?

    It's just a flesh wound.

  60. Re:Socrates by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell, for most of history nobody made much of an effort to distinguish between real and fictional people.

  61. Unique Nature of webapps by rrajdev · · Score: 0
  62. Must be grant money in it by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk's primary talent is fleecing us, the taxpayers. He is the world's largest recipient of government grants, hand outs, and subsidies - more than any human that ever lived on earth.

    Shut off your flaming machine. This is the truth, and it's a compliment, it's not that easy to steal that kind of money legally. His closest competitor would be General Electric's Jeffrey Immelt.

    But you can be certain that there are government grants to be made in the tunneling business, or this would not be happening.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist
  63. Re:Socrates by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    Plato is a fictional shadow-puppet made up by that guy standing at the mouth of the cave.