To fully understand the concept of religion its important to understand why and how this concept came about.
All systems of belief have flaws, for all any belief system is, is a constrained interpretation of the all that is. Why this is, is because abstract language used to communicate shared perspectives cannot express the all..... that is. - T.Rue
There is the why and how we came to create and use abstraction and out of this also came effort to create philosophies inline with the subconscious state of living (as many animals still do today) as the conscious mind cannot handle the massive amount of information the subconscious has access to. We use belief filters (and philosophies) to reduce what all we allow into our consciousness (me for me, you for you)
Interesting reads! Can you put the pieces together?
There is a reason why the number and size of protest around the world are happening. The common factor is people in the general population are getting fed up with the distortions of the few ruling over them.
I think it would be wise to allow so called Satanist to have their monument and specifically next to the ten commandments as simply a matter of contrast of the biased constraints. Might also go for something from each of the religions that people might get a good look at "in part".
If it were easy and fun, everyone would be doing it for themselves. But the Software Industry knows this and avoids anything that will gravitate towards the self recursive act of programming to automate complexity for and by the end users.
Programming can and should be a lot easier but like the Social and earning position of the Roman Numeral Accountants, those in the software industry (both sides - FOSS and Proprietary) do not want this because it will remove their earning and social position (while making genuine software engineering a real industry), Roman Numeral Accounts diminished upon teh introduction and acceptance of the Hindu-Arabic Decimal system (making make easy enough that everyday people can do math beyond what the Roman Numeral Accounts were able to. Current Software Development Industry methodologies cannot achieve programming at the Holodeck level. To do so requires redoing the understanding of the honest foundation upon which all abstraction are created and used. See: http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php
Honesty is a bitch, because those against it make it so.
All money is nothing more than an abstract representation of value. It was created to ease trade (to overcome limitations of barter). And the only value in this abstraction we call money is the agreed upon use of it. Problem is, all of this abstract value representation has been abused so badly that it no longer is a genuine honest representation of the real values its supposed to represent. The proof is obvious, once its realized that with all the bankruptcies there is not a single person that can show me the less than zero real value that is supposed to be represented by the less than zero numbers of bankruptcies. Furthermore for a perfect example of how this abstract tool of money can be and has been so wrongly abused and manipulated against the real values its supposed to represent, google "trillion dollar bet" and educate yourself of how much was stolen in real value via abstract representation of real value.
I mean if the NSA in noseing in on people via the internet and what the people access on the internet...... I bet the NSA has the world largest porn and child porn collection and etc... in the world. So I have a question: How much discrediting might they do to the Catholic Church? Given the unsavory history of things the church has done?
Real books are much easier to reference/tag pagers and skim, easier to get a general idea of where information is, etc.. Electronic media fails totally on teh easy mental image of where information is.
Wikipedia is by its very policy a hear-say sight. For people to understand this and note the Wikipedia disclaimer, there is no need to think of questioning its credibility.
For its not up to Wikipedia to be credible but of the sources they perform hear-say on.
To say Wikipedia is failing in credibility is really only an indication of the credibility of its many editors choice of sources........ is as close as it gets to attaching Credibility issues to Wikipedia.
Ultimately its the credibility of the sources which most certainly include Main Stream Media. And we should all know by now, those are not reliable, trustworthy sources.
...They can also be used against you to indicate you are lying when telling the truth, enabling deception to be applied against you. I suspect that's the real exposure here and why the Government would like you to be what they want you to be..... when fabricating false flags.
A drone strike on a Foreign Embassy located in Britain will certainly give him a bigger challenge than he will be able to handle in his effort to justify.
Computers don't "understand" anything, they are machines that simply do what they are programmed to do. The first step is for humans to understand what computers really are. They are nothing more than abstraction processing machines which have not the ability to "understand" the abstractions they process but only to process abstraction as they are programmed to do.
Artificial Intelligence is artificial by definition. And the appearance of intelligence in computers is nothing more than an active image of human thought processes captured and put into the stone of computer hardware to process. So to increase the "appearance" of intelligence we only need to capture more human thought processes and map them in a manner that is accessible..
Of course the way to do this is to recognize the functions we humans cannot avoid the use of and program the computer to have this functionality, that we may be better able to capture and map images of human mental processing in a manner of machine processing ability.
When the software industry finally lets go of their hold on the users and let the users do more for themselves, we will reach this "Appearance of intelligence" in machine much faster. See: http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php .
"Is it any surprise that computers can't "understand" what we mean, given the minefield of language?"
Uh, computers don't "understand" anything, they are machines that simply do what they are programmed to do. The first step is for humans to understand what computers really are. They are nothing more than abstraction processing machines which have not the ability to "understand" the abstractions they process but only to process abstraction as they are programmed to do.
Artificial Intelligence is artificial by definition. And the appearance of intelligence in computers is nothing more than an active image of human thought processes captured and put into the stone of computer hardware. So to increase the "appearance" of intelligence we only need to capture more human thought processes and map them in a manner that is searchable.
Of course the way to do this is to recognize the functions we humans cannot avoid the use of and program the computer to have this functionality, that we may be better able to capture and map images of human mental processing in a manner of machine processing ability.
When the software industry finally lets go of their hold on teh users and let the users do more for themselves, we will reach this "Appearance of intelligence" in machine much faster. See: http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php .
So Science huh, well here are the facts, research them yourself if you do not believe me,
The 2012 election turnout of qualified voters was the lowest percentage of such voter turnout since before 1948, perhaps of all time as my research only went back that far. The qualified voter turnout percentage in the 2012 presidential election was around 50% and this was divided up between Obama, Romney and others.
The real winner of the 2012 election is the "No Vote" and what this says is that people are recognizing the.... well, the parent post about who can tell the best lies.... to bad there is only 5 mod points for if mod point were not limited..... Those of us who see past the lies might better be recognized.
...Polygraphs can be beaten and as such are not reliable! Deniability is man most powerful tool. So really its all about abstraction. What definition do you apply to the questions or do you simply deny the questioner over your own internal thoughts?
The ability of beat a polygraph might actually be a quality the government is looking for....... considering all the lies they have told and certainly spying would find the ability to beat a polygraph an asset.
So you see, its really all null and void this polygraph issue.
Now what more does anyone need to consider in their mental state to beat a polygraph?
Slashdot Mirror
Its a test to see if the sheeple count has gone down and how far.
.... this will be found under the "apps" chrome browser links .... right along with Facebook...
.... early research on Quantum Physics.... before it was labeled such.
To fully understand the concept of religion its important to understand why and how this concept came about.
All systems of belief have flaws, for all any belief system is, is a constrained interpretation of the all that is. Why this is, is because abstract language used to communicate shared perspectives cannot express the all..... that is. - T.Rue
There is the why and how we came to create and use abstraction and out of this also came effort to create philosophies inline with the subconscious state of living (as many animals still do today) as the conscious mind cannot handle the massive amount of information the subconscious has access to. We use belief filters (and philosophies) to reduce what all we allow into our consciousness (me for me, you for you)
Interesting reads! Can you put the pieces together?
http://www.bizcharts.com/stoa_del_sol/conscious/conscious3.html
Perspective of Mind: Julian Jaynes
http://leftinthedark.org.uk/sites/default/files/Left%20in%20the%20Dark%20free%20edition.pdf
LEFT IN THE DARK
http://esgs.free.fr/uk/art/sands.htm
Science & Sanity (extreme left brain?)
http://umclidet.com/pdf/Frank.R..Wallace.-.Neocheating.pdf
Wallace - Neocheating. (the how to abuse mans left hemisphere?)
http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php
Abstraction Physics (The Mechanics)
http://iamb.net/IJMB/journal/IJMB_Vol_3_1.pdf
NEUROSCIENCE REVEALS THE WHOLE-BRAIN STATE.....(ARTICLE PAGE 73)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&%3Bv=9l6VPpDublg
No More Secrets
There is a reason why the number and size of protest around the world are happening. The common factor is people in the general population are getting fed up with the distortions of the few ruling over them.
I think it would be wise to allow so called Satanist to have their monument and specifically next to the ten commandments as simply a matter of contrast of the biased constraints. Might also go for something from each of the religions that people might get a good look at "in part".
If it were easy and fun, everyone would be doing it for themselves.
But the Software Industry knows this and avoids anything that will gravitate towards the self recursive act of programming to automate complexity for and by the end users.
Programming can and should be a lot easier but like the Social and earning position of the Roman Numeral Accountants, those in the software industry (both sides - FOSS and Proprietary) do not want this because it will remove their earning and social position (while making genuine software engineering a real industry), Roman Numeral Accounts diminished upon teh introduction and acceptance of the Hindu-Arabic Decimal system (making make easy enough that everyday people can do math beyond what the Roman Numeral Accounts were able to.
Current Software Development Industry methodologies cannot achieve programming at the Holodeck level. To do so requires redoing the understanding of the honest foundation upon which all abstraction are created and used. See: http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php
Honesty is a bitch, because those against it make it so.
If the Fan Industry didn't put guards on fans.......
The solution is so obvious I should not have to spell it out.
All money is nothing more than an abstract representation of value. It was created to ease trade (to overcome limitations of barter). And the only value in this abstraction we call money is the agreed upon use of it. Problem is, all of this abstract value representation has been abused so badly that it no longer is a genuine honest representation of the real values its supposed to represent. The proof is obvious, once its realized that with all the bankruptcies there is not a single person that can show me the less than zero real value that is supposed to be represented by the less than zero numbers of bankruptcies. Furthermore for a perfect example of how this abstract tool of money can be and has been so wrongly abused and manipulated against the real values its supposed to represent, google "trillion dollar bet" and educate yourself of how much was stolen in real value via abstract representation of real value.
I mean if the NSA in noseing in on people via the internet and what the people access on the internet...... I bet the NSA has the world largest porn and child porn collection and etc... in the world. So I have a question: How much discrediting might they do to the Catholic Church? Given the unsavory history of things the church has done?
Real books are much easier to reference/tag pagers and skim, easier to get a general idea of where information is, etc.. Electronic media fails totally on teh easy mental image of where information is.
..... the ironic war.
...the AI NEIL will think reality is photoshopped and it will not know the difference.
And knowing this is common sense NEIL will never know..
... were against democracy.... that is why they established a Republic.
For a better understanding of different government systems - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFXuGIpsdE0
I do not approve my taxes being spent for this.
....there are such sites out there.... That's Plural...
Wikipedia is by its very policy a hear-say sight. For people to understand this and note the Wikipedia disclaimer, there is no need to think of questioning its credibility.
For its not up to Wikipedia to be credible but of the sources they perform hear-say on.
To say Wikipedia is failing in credibility is really only an indication of the credibility of its many editors choice of sources........ is as close as it gets to attaching Credibility issues to Wikipedia.
Ultimately its the credibility of the sources which most certainly include Main Stream Media. And we should all know by now, those are not reliable, trustworthy sources.
Where the hell is my extended paid vacation?
What is the point of automation if not to provide am improved life experience?
...They can also be used against you to indicate you are lying when telling the truth, enabling deception to be applied against you.
I suspect that's the real exposure here and why the Government would like you to be what they want you to be..... when fabricating false flags.
... they are not supposed to defend themselves....
How about we charge the federal prosecutors with intent to deceive.
Where is our Declaration of Independence authority to put off bad government?
Or is it just that people haven't woken up enough to apply it?
A drone strike on a Foreign Embassy located in Britain will certainly give him a bigger challenge than he will be able to handle in his effort to justify.
Computers don't "understand" anything, they are machines that simply do what they are programmed to do.
The first step is for humans to understand what computers really are. They are nothing more than abstraction processing machines which have not the ability to "understand" the abstractions they process but only to process abstraction as they are programmed to do.
Artificial Intelligence is artificial by definition. And the appearance of intelligence in computers is nothing more than an active image of human thought processes captured and put into the stone of computer hardware to process. So to increase the "appearance" of intelligence we only need to capture more human thought processes and map them in a manner that is accessible..
Of course the way to do this is to recognize the functions we humans cannot avoid the use of and program the computer to have this functionality, that we may be better able to capture and map images of human mental processing in a manner of machine processing ability.
When the software industry finally lets go of their hold on the users and let the users do more for themselves, we will reach this "Appearance of intelligence" in machine much faster. See: http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php .
"Is it any surprise that computers can't "understand" what we mean, given the minefield of language?"
Uh, computers don't "understand" anything, they are machines that simply do what they are programmed to do.
The first step is for humans to understand what computers really are. They are nothing more than abstraction processing machines which have not the ability to "understand" the abstractions they process but only to process abstraction as they are programmed to do.
Artificial Intelligence is artificial by definition. And the appearance of intelligence in computers is nothing more than an active image of human thought processes captured and put into the stone of computer hardware. So to increase the "appearance" of intelligence we only need to capture more human thought processes and map them in a manner that is searchable.
Of course the way to do this is to recognize the functions we humans cannot avoid the use of and program the computer to have this functionality, that we may be better able to capture and map images of human mental processing in a manner of machine processing ability.
When the software industry finally lets go of their hold on teh users and let the users do more for themselves, we will reach this "Appearance of intelligence" in machine much faster. See: http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php .
So Science huh, well here are the facts, research them yourself if you do not believe me,
The 2012 election turnout of qualified voters was the lowest percentage of such voter turnout since before 1948, perhaps of all time as my research only went back that far.
The qualified voter turnout percentage in the 2012 presidential election was around 50% and this was divided up between Obama, Romney and others.
The real winner of the 2012 election is the "No Vote" and what this says is that people are recognizing the .... well, the parent post about who can tell the best lies.... to bad there is only 5 mod points for if mod point were not limited..... Those of us who see past the lies might better be recognized.
...Polygraphs can be beaten and as such are not reliable!
Deniability is man most powerful tool. So really its all about abstraction. What definition do you apply to the questions or do you simply deny the questioner over your own internal thoughts?
The ability of beat a polygraph might actually be a quality the government is looking for....... considering all the lies they have told and certainly spying would find the ability to beat a polygraph an asset.
So you see, its really all null and void this polygraph issue.
Now what more does anyone need to consider in their mental state to beat a polygraph?