Not a fact until verified. That site is untrustworthy.
It is verified, go read the emails yourself(there's a search function). Or do you believe that there's someone out there with so much autism that they're going to fake all those emails? Perhaps you prefer your news in bite-size chunks where they tell you what you should believe.
That's probably because it's true. If the establishment on either side is saying "fuck you" choosing someone who isn't establishment is the best choice, if to do nothing else then to toss a giant wrench into the gears. The democrats in general have been all over H1B's and being for it like flies on shit. Establishment republicans have also been all over it. And while IT has been the big punching bag taking the vast majority of "internal outsourcing" it's been the general white collar and elites in academia that kept(and keep) saying that "Well if you didn't want to lose your job, you should have picked something like this instead!" Right up until their job is outsourced to someone that's been imported.
The reality is, this is the type of shit that causes revolutions and public revolts. The establishment doesn't seem to get this, or believe that if and when it does happen they're going to be perfectly safe from it. Sadly this isn't a US-centric problem either, Canada has a similar system call TFW's, the current government believes that importing them is a great idea too. They've been used to replace people from white collar jobs like IT and accounting, to blue collar jobs like machinists and welders. And even the bottom of the rung fast-food jobs.
The only reason Westerners eat animals is habit, taste or convenience, which is NOT reason enough to kill an animal.
The only reason why we eat animals is because we're omnivores. And eating too much meat is just as bad as eating too many vegetables. Actually eating too many vegetables is in many cases worse, since you lose out on essential things that will keep you alive that you can't get from plants. Though you can get some of them from eating mineral rich dirt.
If you really want to live a long life, you live a balanced life. If you want to die a short life in agony, you go to the extreme at either end. FYI: Heart disease has many factors(from environmental to genetic), the main cause of it in the west is we spend too much time on our asses.
Outing crooks being crooks is one thing. Outing honest people for being honest, when that will surely cost them their careers, is something else.
If he's unwilling to push for reform while being at the top of his position and in a position of power. He's no different then a crook, or in truth he has no problem with it because it supports his ideology(and that of his party in power).
Keep in mind that several states have now on-going investigations. Probably the largest right now is Indiana, which is investigating every county and fraudulent voter ID's have been linked to democrat linked or backed organizations.
Boomers don't have a patch on millenials, but they're a direct consequence of boomers redefining of child rearing(go stand in the corner jimmy, you only burned down a park) and education(what do you mean you they can't read or write? Pass them anyway!). Whether it be the push of participation trophies or the rampant ego-stroking and response that you see through various forms of social media in order to gain acceptance. Or their push of anti-speech platforms which were an anathema to boomers who fought against them in the first place. Boomers have done plenty of things to fuck shit up, but compared to the entire "I'm a special snowflake, that offends me, it needs to be banned, I'm a polyamorous-non-binary-elf-transkin-dragon, omg-slactivist those white males are oppressing those women by having a different opinion. What do you mean slavery in UAE and rampant abuse of women in Islam? That doesn't effect me! 'Bring back our girls'" garbage. It's bad, so bad that even psychiatrists and psychologists are saying there's an epidemic problem with narcissistic behavior in this the millennial generation.
Do you have a link to that study? I'm wondering because I would guess the value is much higher than that. But it could also be lower. So I try my best not to simply pull number out of my ass whenever commenting online.
Lot of studies on it, sometimes it's higher sometimes lower. There's another rule that's used in policing and with internal theft investigators called the 30/40/30 rule when dealing with internal theft. 30% of people will steal no matter what, 40% will steal if no one is watching and they're sure they'll be able to get away with it. 30% will never steal even if they're starving. The percentages vary, usually between 5-15% again depending on the study. Most police forces/services and private security that deal only with internal theft have their own policy book on this as well. It's also been covered in every criminology textbook I've ever read.
People by nature are covetous creatures, it's the small number who will never steal, and those who are put off from stealing by basic deterent methods that you want to hire for example. If you want to have some fun, make buddies with the security or management at your nearest big box store. Then start asking them about their internal theft(employees) vs external theft(customers) numbers. In I'd say 80% of the cases were I've been able to find out, internal theft usually outstrips internal by 10-20:1 in value of items stolen. A buddy of mine operates an internal theft investigative company, at his last contract a employee had stolen nearly $32m worth of merchandise(from sporting goods to TV's to baby formula). The yearly loss from external theft was around $2.2m. Baby formula is one of the biggies though, because it's used to cut street drugs and even being sold at 50% of market value it's a huge earner for people who get their hands on it in large quantities.
All good mobo makers have long since moved to solid-state caps, it's only the bottom of the barrel pre-manufactured garbage where you have to worry about that problem now. In otherwords, if you're building your own on a Saturday afternoon. Likely no problems. Buy from dell, acer, lenovo, or whatever, you're getting what you pay for...mostly the name.
Likely, though a lot of that is easy to detect if you have the sensors for it. Keep in mind that the US border across Mexico doesn't, and the Obama administration heavily leans on ICE to stop guards from actually doing anything.
It's likely drugs or medications, it's the only reasonable explanation. Ask yourself, what's the most insane thing you thought has been true while on some pain medication or hypnotic drug for whatever. Now consider you've got lots of money, and can afford to grease a doctors palms to get you a steady supply of something that'll make you feel great, all the time. Makes a lot of sense doesn't it?
Anyone who's been on pain meds at a high dose will tell you all the fucked up stuff that they've either done or thought of. And anyone who's taken some form of barbiturate(was the drug of choice until the 80's when coke became popular) will tell you the same thing.
The reality is that just caused massive fuel buildup in the forests, and made them far more flammable than they were in the past. That said, climate change has magnified this problem and made the tinder box even more dangerous.
Considering that forests here in the west thrive on natural burn policies, and the current forestry management practice is to put them out ASAP, you're right on part of that. There are parts in the pine forests in Western Canada where the debris is more then 6' deep in places. Some places are even worse after the pine beetle infestations, there are places in the US the same way. Climate change hasn't magnified this problem, but humans sure have magnified it by not letting natural burn & regrowth cycles to occur.
Hell when I was in California(Southern) in the 1980's visiting with my dad's friends, the hills in the mountains usually burned every summer or every other summer. I was out there ~4 years ago, 3' of debris and the last fire had been in 1996. They put out even the smallest brush fire in minutes. These are man-made problems.
The media has been attacking Bill Clinton for 20+ years now. They aren't going to suddenly stop if he can't be re-elected.
Fixed that for you. His past hangs around her neck, mainly because she's been involved in them in some degree. But she has 20+ years of her own scandals and fuckups. Some much worse than her husbands.
But the media doesn't cover most of her stuff, in many cases they turn a blind eye. If her name wasn't as well known as it was, you can bet that every time that an article was written they'd leave that fancy (D) off her name, like they do with nearly all democrats unless they get some massive shit. Like Lee(D-CA) did, they left that off right up until he was arraigned on criminal conspiracy and gun-trafficking.
Only applies to women because diversity. The men wouldn't be hired anyway, google would have already put in applications for H1B's and claimed there's no people capable of doing the job.
I like how you provided lots of links and other evidence to back up your claims.
Plus I like how you completely ignored what you wrote and I replied to and decided to take my replies as if they were to something else entirely. Neat!:)
Shouldn't be hard for you to go look in your own post history now would it? Or use a basic *insert search engine here* search, unless you're claiming that there's more then one person using your account or you have MPD, or you have a worse memory then mine. In which case I wish you the best of luck with your alzheimer's disease.
Personally I liked the part where you still can't answer anything, and continue to flail about.
Ah, Herr Goebbels wants only his state sanctioned reporting, that's clear.
The sad thing is, he thinks it is new. Sorry, but Yellow Journalism has always been popular. And yes, this even includes legendary hero, Ben Franklin.
Well let's look there AC. When was the last time you looked at foreign media for news on the US, because US news wouldn't report on it because it would either: Make Obama look bad, or make Hillary look bad. I'll wait.
Considering that the state of the media has hit tabloid levels of journalism, you might want to pay more attention. When the media creates news in order to draw in eyes rather then report even on the most basic passing in truth...
How many people show up isn't a perfect reflection of voting preference.
Actually it is, ask yourself how well Carter or Bush I did on their re-election campaigns. But considering how disengaged democrats are in general with this election, and just how many are sitting it out fully. You're likely going to be in for a surprise.
That's generally how popularity contests are won are they not? If you're running for office and can't fill a high school gymnasium, you've got serious problems. If you can fill an aircraft hanger with standing room only, and have to turn people away. You're saying what people want to hear, or your ideas are resonating with their own beliefs.
I'm in the bag for whichever candidate can defeat Donald Trump so badly that his kind of ugly white nationalist hate
Easy to tell who's actually sucking the dick of the establishment when they're pushing actual talking points. I'm sure you also believe enforcing the laws on the books with regards to illegals is "white nationalist hate." Why not bring it into the open? You don't believe in the rule of law and are committed to fucking over everyone.
Your comment is the perfect example of why there is a growing populist backlash. It's also the same reason why Trump is far more popular then Hillary, hell she can't even fill 500 seats. And he can fill 10k and turn people away.
Both the olde media and new media needs to die. It didn't take more then a decade before the new started going exactly the same shit as the olde did and does. The media landscape in general is ripe for organizations that publish factual and generally neutral, or pieces where they declare their bias right out in the open. It's one of the reasons why far-left news orgs are in a cash free fall, whether it be WAPO, Politco or The Guardian. Or garbage clickbait like Vox, Huffpo, etc. While sites that are fully open with their bias, like Breitbart, Washington Examiner, etc., or neutral reporting like The Spectator(UK), are gaining eyeballs and making money off advertising. Even in the current state of advertising being worthless.
Says the AC who can't actually answer to any of the questions, but tries to deflect. Note that in your other "case" that people were prosecuted for it...oh of course not. Which is why you show yourself as an actual partisan hack.
Slashdot Mirror
That moment when even the WSJ starts calling out the bullshit...
Not a fact until verified. That site is untrustworthy.
It is verified, go read the emails yourself(there's a search function). Or do you believe that there's someone out there with so much autism that they're going to fake all those emails? Perhaps you prefer your news in bite-size chunks where they tell you what you should believe.
Facts = troll. FYI when you're unwilling to look at something because it might hurt your feels, you're just an intellectual coward.
Witcher 2 had DRM for about 48hrs, and then the developers removed it because it was hurting legitimate customers.
That's probably because it's true. If the establishment on either side is saying "fuck you" choosing someone who isn't establishment is the best choice, if to do nothing else then to toss a giant wrench into the gears. The democrats in general have been all over H1B's and being for it like flies on shit. Establishment republicans have also been all over it. And while IT has been the big punching bag taking the vast majority of "internal outsourcing" it's been the general white collar and elites in academia that kept(and keep) saying that "Well if you didn't want to lose your job, you should have picked something like this instead!" Right up until their job is outsourced to someone that's been imported.
The reality is, this is the type of shit that causes revolutions and public revolts. The establishment doesn't seem to get this, or believe that if and when it does happen they're going to be perfectly safe from it. Sadly this isn't a US-centric problem either, Canada has a similar system call TFW's, the current government believes that importing them is a great idea too. They've been used to replace people from white collar jobs like IT and accounting, to blue collar jobs like machinists and welders. And even the bottom of the rung fast-food jobs.
For some people this is already beyond desperate.
The only reason Westerners eat animals is habit, taste or convenience, which is NOT reason enough to kill an animal.
The only reason why we eat animals is because we're omnivores. And eating too much meat is just as bad as eating too many vegetables. Actually eating too many vegetables is in many cases worse, since you lose out on essential things that will keep you alive that you can't get from plants. Though you can get some of them from eating mineral rich dirt.
If you really want to live a long life, you live a balanced life. If you want to die a short life in agony, you go to the extreme at either end. FYI: Heart disease has many factors(from environmental to genetic), the main cause of it in the west is we spend too much time on our asses.
Outing crooks being crooks is one thing. Outing honest people for being honest, when that will surely cost them their careers, is something else.
If he's unwilling to push for reform while being at the top of his position and in a position of power. He's no different then a crook, or in truth he has no problem with it because it supports his ideology(and that of his party in power).
Keep in mind that several states have now on-going investigations. Probably the largest right now is Indiana, which is investigating every county and fraudulent voter ID's have been linked to democrat linked or backed organizations.
Boomers don't have a patch on millenials, but they're a direct consequence of boomers redefining of child rearing(go stand in the corner jimmy, you only burned down a park) and education(what do you mean you they can't read or write? Pass them anyway!). Whether it be the push of participation trophies or the rampant ego-stroking and response that you see through various forms of social media in order to gain acceptance. Or their push of anti-speech platforms which were an anathema to boomers who fought against them in the first place. Boomers have done plenty of things to fuck shit up, but compared to the entire "I'm a special snowflake, that offends me, it needs to be banned, I'm a polyamorous-non-binary-elf-transkin-dragon, omg-slactivist those white males are oppressing those women by having a different opinion. What do you mean slavery in UAE and rampant abuse of women in Islam? That doesn't effect me! 'Bring back our girls'" garbage. It's bad, so bad that even psychiatrists and psychologists are saying there's an epidemic problem with narcissistic behavior in this the millennial generation.
Do you have a link to that study? I'm wondering because I would guess the value is much higher than that. But it could also be lower. So I try my best not to simply pull number out of my ass whenever commenting online.
Lot of studies on it, sometimes it's higher sometimes lower. There's another rule that's used in policing and with internal theft investigators called the 30/40/30 rule when dealing with internal theft. 30% of people will steal no matter what, 40% will steal if no one is watching and they're sure they'll be able to get away with it. 30% will never steal even if they're starving. The percentages vary, usually between 5-15% again depending on the study. Most police forces/services and private security that deal only with internal theft have their own policy book on this as well. It's also been covered in every criminology textbook I've ever read.
People by nature are covetous creatures, it's the small number who will never steal, and those who are put off from stealing by basic deterent methods that you want to hire for example. If you want to have some fun, make buddies with the security or management at your nearest big box store. Then start asking them about their internal theft(employees) vs external theft(customers) numbers. In I'd say 80% of the cases were I've been able to find out, internal theft usually outstrips internal by 10-20:1 in value of items stolen. A buddy of mine operates an internal theft investigative company, at his last contract a employee had stolen nearly $32m worth of merchandise(from sporting goods to TV's to baby formula). The yearly loss from external theft was around $2.2m. Baby formula is one of the biggies though, because it's used to cut street drugs and even being sold at 50% of market value it's a huge earner for people who get their hands on it in large quantities.
All good mobo makers have long since moved to solid-state caps, it's only the bottom of the barrel pre-manufactured garbage where you have to worry about that problem now. In otherwords, if you're building your own on a Saturday afternoon. Likely no problems. Buy from dell, acer, lenovo, or whatever, you're getting what you pay for...mostly the name.
Likely, though a lot of that is easy to detect if you have the sensors for it. Keep in mind that the US border across Mexico doesn't, and the Obama administration heavily leans on ICE to stop guards from actually doing anything.
Anyway, what I find interesting is how this is a story on /. but something like the NYC election commissioner coming out and saying that there's serious voter fraud going on, with groups busing people around and that voter ID is a good thing isn't up.
make so many people lose their grip on reality?
It's likely drugs or medications, it's the only reasonable explanation. Ask yourself, what's the most insane thing you thought has been true while on some pain medication or hypnotic drug for whatever. Now consider you've got lots of money, and can afford to grease a doctors palms to get you a steady supply of something that'll make you feel great, all the time. Makes a lot of sense doesn't it?
Anyone who's been on pain meds at a high dose will tell you all the fucked up stuff that they've either done or thought of. And anyone who's taken some form of barbiturate(was the drug of choice until the 80's when coke became popular) will tell you the same thing.
The reality is that just caused massive fuel buildup in the forests, and made them far more flammable than they were in the past. That said, climate change has magnified this problem and made the tinder box even more dangerous.
Considering that forests here in the west thrive on natural burn policies, and the current forestry management practice is to put them out ASAP, you're right on part of that. There are parts in the pine forests in Western Canada where the debris is more then 6' deep in places. Some places are even worse after the pine beetle infestations, there are places in the US the same way. Climate change hasn't magnified this problem, but humans sure have magnified it by not letting natural burn & regrowth cycles to occur.
Hell when I was in California(Southern) in the 1980's visiting with my dad's friends, the hills in the mountains usually burned every summer or every other summer. I was out there ~4 years ago, 3' of debris and the last fire had been in 1996. They put out even the smallest brush fire in minutes. These are man-made problems.
The media has been attacking Bill Clinton for 20+ years now. They aren't going to suddenly stop if he can't be re-elected.
Fixed that for you. His past hangs around her neck, mainly because she's been involved in them in some degree. But she has 20+ years of her own scandals and fuckups. Some much worse than her husbands.
But the media doesn't cover most of her stuff, in many cases they turn a blind eye. If her name wasn't as well known as it was, you can bet that every time that an article was written they'd leave that fancy (D) off her name, like they do with nearly all democrats unless they get some massive shit. Like Lee(D-CA) did, they left that off right up until he was arraigned on criminal conspiracy and gun-trafficking.
Just like CNN is a DNC/Hillary front. Right? Gotta love those "undeclared voters" being coached on what to say.
Only applies to women because diversity. The men wouldn't be hired anyway, google would have already put in applications for H1B's and claimed there's no people capable of doing the job.
I like how you provided lots of links and other evidence to back up your claims.
Plus I like how you completely ignored what you wrote and I replied to and decided to take my replies as if they were to something else entirely. Neat! :)
Shouldn't be hard for you to go look in your own post history now would it? Or use a basic *insert search engine here* search, unless you're claiming that there's more then one person using your account or you have MPD, or you have a worse memory then mine. In which case I wish you the best of luck with your alzheimer's disease.
Personally I liked the part where you still can't answer anything, and continue to flail about.
Ah, Herr Goebbels wants only his state sanctioned reporting, that's clear.
The sad thing is, he thinks it is new. Sorry, but Yellow Journalism has always been popular. And yes, this even includes legendary hero, Ben Franklin.
Well let's look there AC. When was the last time you looked at foreign media for news on the US, because US news wouldn't report on it because it would either: Make Obama look bad, or make Hillary look bad. I'll wait.
Considering that the state of the media has hit tabloid levels of journalism, you might want to pay more attention. When the media creates news in order to draw in eyes rather then report even on the most basic passing in truth...
How many people show up isn't a perfect reflection of voting preference.
Actually it is, ask yourself how well Carter or Bush I did on their re-election campaigns. But considering how disengaged democrats are in general with this election, and just how many are sitting it out fully. You're likely going to be in for a surprise.
16 bits ought to be enough for everybody.
That moment when you remember that 16 kB expander cartridges were a thing.
That's generally how popularity contests are won are they not? If you're running for office and can't fill a high school gymnasium, you've got serious problems. If you can fill an aircraft hanger with standing room only, and have to turn people away. You're saying what people want to hear, or your ideas are resonating with their own beliefs.
I'm in the bag for whichever candidate can defeat Donald Trump so badly that his kind of ugly white nationalist hate
Easy to tell who's actually sucking the dick of the establishment when they're pushing actual talking points. I'm sure you also believe enforcing the laws on the books with regards to illegals is "white nationalist hate." Why not bring it into the open? You don't believe in the rule of law and are committed to fucking over everyone.
Your comment is the perfect example of why there is a growing populist backlash. It's also the same reason why Trump is far more popular then Hillary, hell she can't even fill 500 seats. And he can fill 10k and turn people away.
I'm ready for the old news-media to die.
Both the olde media and new media needs to die. It didn't take more then a decade before the new started going exactly the same shit as the olde did and does. The media landscape in general is ripe for organizations that publish factual and generally neutral, or pieces where they declare their bias right out in the open. It's one of the reasons why far-left news orgs are in a cash free fall, whether it be WAPO, Politco or The Guardian. Or garbage clickbait like Vox, Huffpo, etc. While sites that are fully open with their bias, like Breitbart, Washington Examiner, etc., or neutral reporting like The Spectator(UK), are gaining eyeballs and making money off advertising. Even in the current state of advertising being worthless.
This is why you have no credibility. Stupid shit.
Says the AC who can't actually answer to any of the questions, but tries to deflect. Note that in your other "case" that people were prosecuted for it...oh of course not. Which is why you show yourself as an actual partisan hack.