Depends really. Lots of things that are important for you are deathly toxic, so eh whatever. I'll almost bet that in 10 yeas you'll find that the oil spill was massively overblown as scientists figure out exactly how much life there is dependent on oil. And we'll see explosive microbial growth because of it.
Well considering that, that's done in some parts of the APCR, and South America. Everywhere else in the world, I'll bet that there's been nothing but a net gain for the last oh 400 odd years.
Guess putting your fingers in your ears and modding someone troll is an appropriate response to news you don't want to believe.
Well it's hope n' change you can believe in!
This really isn't anything to be surprised at however, the majority here lean to the left. If you show them the error of their ways they're more likely to start screaming LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Than someone who's willing to look at both sides of an issue.
Probably. The only problem is you don't get a feeling for it actually happening in front of your eyes when you start playing. I kinda remember my first kit, about half of it was full of highly dangerous and toxic chemicals that would have been banned today. But I learned a lot.
Maybe it was because I understood that if I ate the copper sulfate it would have been a moderately bad idea. Well that and my parents taught me to be responsible, and you know...read the instruction booklet.
Some time wasted under bureaucracy. Okay, a person goes off to get hired at a job, the employer who's the government says you need to have a medical clear. The doctors, and specialists say there's nothing wrong, aokay. The doctor fails to pass the person. The people who can review the said case, meet twice a year. Once in the spring and once in the fall. 6mo isn't a long time, or anything.
I can name just about any subsidizing program in existence as it stands. So lets go with healthcare, in Canada the bureaucracy for 'healthcare' is about 40c/dollar is spent at the administrative level. Google and the cbc are over there.
You haven't shown anything. The only time where the government is efficient in providing services is when private corporations won't. However everyone picks up the tab for it. Such as the $27m/year to run 150km of rail line in northern ontario to a small town(which was only costing CN ~3.8m/year) but they cut it as a non-essential link to their service. Or the massively subsidized telephone services out west, again because no one until recently wanted to get into it.
And I've just told you a bunch of things where the government happily wastes money. And let me give you some advice, I haven't been wrong once. But you're happily believing that the world of government services is 'cheap' and 'inexpensive'.
That's great except police are limited by what can be done, and you'll generally find that police services(or forces depending on where you are), have bigger fish to fry(like rape, murder, assaults, theft(physical), etc). In Canada unless the losses in relation to a computer crime, are greater than $100k the RCMP will not investigate. Local police will direct you there, and if it's under 100k, your local dept. may possibly try to divert manpower to it. But the ability to investigate is limited.
Internet based crime is a low priority, half because of manpower issues, half because police worldwide are in a transitional state in the way they do policing.
It's a seriously wtf type of thing. You can expect editors and sub editors to regularly snip stuff from your columns anymore. Which is why I don't write anything to be published in the paper.
Nah, you haven't realized it yet but you've fallen into the mode of a partisan hack and refuse to look at an article because it hasn't been stamped and approved by someone else other than *insert news outlet here*.
Sorry. All CFL's flicker, those of us with occipital lobe injuries can perceive them more than the average person. Also people who suffer from light induced migraines, or any form of light sensitivity have a higher chance of seeing flicker. No matter what brand it is.
They can pry my incandescents out of my hands, when they fix the flicker issue. And yes, going into a store that uses nothing but some form of fluorescent light is pure torture.
Happens a lot, ever see news article editing? That's exactly what happens to keep things inside an arbitrary limit. If a sub editor doesn't understand the topic, or point. Poof, useful information that puts something in context is gone.
Seriously, go and write an opinion piece, and have it published. I have, mine has appeared in the national post(canada), The Globe and Mail, and posted by the CBC on their site. I was limited to 700 words.
Well lets run with that. You have non-productive members of society, working in society, producing nothing except being a part of the bureaucracy. Which means that as unemployment creeps higher, fewer people exist to "pay" for that job.
You however missed the point from the parent, so I'll let you go back and reread that. There's plenty of government services you don't need, which operate and you won't die if they didn't exist as well. AKA you don't need them to survive. Stability does create money, however when you have 4:1 ratios of individuals or less like in Europe where it's 2.8:1, due to bloat, you tell me what you gain except a lack of money at the end of the day, which you can in turn use to make the economy turn.
Considering government bloat is the fastest way to hemorrhage money I agree. In Canada it take 4 people to pay for the job of 1 civil servant. It's probably around 6:1 in the US, government makes no money, it creates no money, all it does it take and spend another persons.
I'm sure that's good for the GP if they refuse to show. Since in most of the western and eastern world(japan/s.korea/philippines/etc), that's an automatic summery judgment against them. Refusing to show in court is an automatic admission of guilt pretty much everywhere. So he'd get his money. But useful to point out and all that, most corps have lawyers who deal with small claims and that's all.
Also, in most cases for claims of under $1k they'll just give the money and be done with it. Because it's cheaper than having a lawyer on retainer that costs $1k/hr to show up in court.
Because a court is a court, and believe it or not corps have lawyers who exist for the purpose of dealing with small claims. But really if you're talking about $100-400 vs a $1k lawyer+court costs, they'll just send you your money back without ever having to worry about it.
And yes, summery judgments if you're a now show do exist. Unless you live in a 3rd world shithole.
Well let me point this out from Canada. In Canada coercion is illegal(unless it falls under a very limited set of exclusionary rules), and extortion is illegal. Don't do it, don't do it at all here. We will come down on you hard.
Slashdot Mirror
You could also use silica gel, but that may carry other risks.
Well that's pretty easy. You just need to wave your arms a lot, scream they're evil Jews and you're all set.
Depends really. Lots of things that are important for you are deathly toxic, so eh whatever. I'll almost bet that in 10 yeas you'll find that the oil spill was massively overblown as scientists figure out exactly how much life there is dependent on oil. And we'll see explosive microbial growth because of it.
Well that and warmists are 100% solidly, sure that everything is 100% positively set in stone and nothing can be wrong at all. Uh-huh...
Well considering that, that's done in some parts of the APCR, and South America. Everywhere else in the world, I'll bet that there's been nothing but a net gain for the last oh 400 odd years.
Guess putting your fingers in your ears and modding someone troll is an appropriate response to news you don't want to believe.
Well it's hope n' change you can believe in!
This really isn't anything to be surprised at however, the majority here lean to the left. If you show them the error of their ways they're more likely to start screaming LALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Than someone who's willing to look at both sides of an issue.
Probably. The only problem is you don't get a feeling for it actually happening in front of your eyes when you start playing. I kinda remember my first kit, about half of it was full of highly dangerous and toxic chemicals that would have been banned today. But I learned a lot.
Maybe it was because I understood that if I ate the copper sulfate it would have been a moderately bad idea. Well that and my parents taught me to be responsible, and you know...read the instruction booklet.
Some time wasted under bureaucracy. Okay, a person goes off to get hired at a job, the employer who's the government says you need to have a medical clear. The doctors, and specialists say there's nothing wrong, aokay. The doctor fails to pass the person. The people who can review the said case, meet twice a year. Once in the spring and once in the fall. 6mo isn't a long time, or anything.
I can name just about any subsidizing program in existence as it stands. So lets go with healthcare, in Canada the bureaucracy for 'healthcare' is about 40c/dollar is spent at the administrative level. Google and the cbc are over there.
You haven't shown anything. The only time where the government is efficient in providing services is when private corporations won't. However everyone picks up the tab for it. Such as the $27m/year to run 150km of rail line in northern ontario to a small town(which was only costing CN ~3.8m/year) but they cut it as a non-essential link to their service. Or the massively subsidized telephone services out west, again because no one until recently wanted to get into it.
And I've just told you a bunch of things where the government happily wastes money. And let me give you some advice, I haven't been wrong once. But you're happily believing that the world of government services is 'cheap' and 'inexpensive'.
Sorry, you might have missed the part in politics where you don't dismiss any reasonable source of news because you "don't like it".
When was the last time you saw flicker, much like you see in photographs across every surface that the lamp hits? You probably don't, other people do.
Always nice to see the arrogant, ITDOESNTHAPPEN crowd coming out on /.
That's great except police are limited by what can be done, and you'll generally find that police services(or forces depending on where you are), have bigger fish to fry(like rape, murder, assaults, theft(physical), etc). In Canada unless the losses in relation to a computer crime, are greater than $100k the RCMP will not investigate. Local police will direct you there, and if it's under 100k, your local dept. may possibly try to divert manpower to it. But the ability to investigate is limited.
Internet based crime is a low priority, half because of manpower issues, half because police worldwide are in a transitional state in the way they do policing.
It's a seriously wtf type of thing. You can expect editors and sub editors to regularly snip stuff from your columns anymore. Which is why I don't write anything to be published in the paper.
Yes. But 150-100 years ago that was acceptable.
Nah, you haven't realized it yet but you've fallen into the mode of a partisan hack and refuse to look at an article because it hasn't been stamped and approved by someone else other than *insert news outlet here*.
Do tell? What happens for those of us in society where it doesn't matter the brand or quality and all you see is an off-shade, with flicker?
Oh right...'put up with it?' Sorry no, I'll stick to incandescents.
Sorry. All CFL's flicker, those of us with occipital lobe injuries can perceive them more than the average person. Also people who suffer from light induced migraines, or any form of light sensitivity have a higher chance of seeing flicker. No matter what brand it is.
They can pry my incandescents out of my hands, when they fix the flicker issue. And yes, going into a store that uses nothing but some form of fluorescent light is pure torture.
By using rootkits and system level injections. That's the only way to do it, and Vundo(and varients) is probably the most famous offender of it.
Happens a lot, ever see news article editing? That's exactly what happens to keep things inside an arbitrary limit. If a sub editor doesn't understand the topic, or point. Poof, useful information that puts something in context is gone.
Seriously, go and write an opinion piece, and have it published. I have, mine has appeared in the national post(canada), The Globe and Mail, and posted by the CBC on their site. I was limited to 700 words.
That's nice. Maybe you could ask sony to stop pissing in the face of their customers, and laughing manically that it's a wonderful warm rain.
That aside, sony reaps what it sows. And consumers will say "enough", and revolt.
Well lets run with that. You have non-productive members of society, working in society, producing nothing except being a part of the bureaucracy. Which means that as unemployment creeps higher, fewer people exist to "pay" for that job.
You however missed the point from the parent, so I'll let you go back and reread that. There's plenty of government services you don't need, which operate and you won't die if they didn't exist as well. AKA you don't need them to survive. Stability does create money, however when you have 4:1 ratios of individuals or less like in Europe where it's 2.8:1, due to bloat, you tell me what you gain except a lack of money at the end of the day, which you can in turn use to make the economy turn.
Considering government bloat is the fastest way to hemorrhage money I agree. In Canada it take 4 people to pay for the job of 1 civil servant. It's probably around 6:1 in the US, government makes no money, it creates no money, all it does it take and spend another persons.
I'm sure that's good for the GP if they refuse to show. Since in most of the western and eastern world(japan/s.korea/philippines/etc), that's an automatic summery judgment against them. Refusing to show in court is an automatic admission of guilt pretty much everywhere. So he'd get his money. But useful to point out and all that, most corps have lawyers who deal with small claims and that's all.
Also, in most cases for claims of under $1k they'll just give the money and be done with it. Because it's cheaper than having a lawyer on retainer that costs $1k/hr to show up in court.
Because a court is a court, and believe it or not corps have lawyers who exist for the purpose of dealing with small claims. But really if you're talking about $100-400 vs a $1k lawyer+court costs, they'll just send you your money back without ever having to worry about it.
And yes, summery judgments if you're a now show do exist. Unless you live in a 3rd world shithole.
So why don't you file in small claims to get your money back? Chances are they'll simply give you, your money just to be done with you.
Well let me point this out from Canada. In Canada coercion is illegal(unless it falls under a very limited set of exclusionary rules), and extortion is illegal. Don't do it, don't do it at all here. We will come down on you hard.