From the hardcore SW geeks(like myself) Star Wars was terrible. It's a "okay space opera" it's a "okay non-SW cannon movie" but anything else it's just well terrible. And you'd find that most of us would have been happier without Space Mary Poppins and the ignoble death of Admiral Ackbar, or the shoehorning of nobody characters that were one dimensional, and garbage like "but I SAVED YOU!" as Finn decides to try and save the rebel base. The movie itself was terrible, it didn't even do a full run in China which is a big market. It lasted 2 weeks, with a ~92% drop off in week 2. Hell, if you really need to see how badly the movie is doing, they're already selling the toys for $1. If they'd turned around and used the EU cannon material of Thrawn, Mara Jade, and so on? You'd be seeing people cheer from the rafters, because not only is there a line of continuation, but the characters have more depth the Rey "thy Mary Sue" Super-force User and it likely wouldn't be such a flat movie.
The problem is Disney and the team of writers decided to pull the "fuck the hardcore fan" we'll make it for everyone else. And it failed just as badly as the Ghostbusters remake. Hell the media followed the same script: "It's not *our* fault it was, bad. It's all those alt-right trolls! Look even more trolls! That's why it's bad. NO REALLY TROLLS!" They're still doubling down on it at this moment, but I'll bet if I was a fly on the wall in the head office of Disney there would be an awful lot of worry, and attempts to push the entire team of writers and so on right out the door to try and salvage the franchise. And if you think TLJ is just an isolated incident? The new Han Solo movie has also been going through extensive rewrites, re-filming of scenes, and the main actor is apparently so wooden that they had to have an acting coach on scene. Don't be surprised if the new Han Solo movie bombs that Disney "put's it on the shelf" for a few years.
The christians in trumps government seem to be intent on rolling back as many health reforms for women and removing equality for all because their religion says so to show that some christians still haven't entered the 20th century yet.
Repeating that meme doesn't make it true. Seems more like you're happier with the state/religion separation only working one way, where under those guaranteed rights businesses, charities, and so on also have protections. So do the people working for them, and in some cases people work for/volunteer for particular morals. Something that various left-wing progressive groups have been very happy to trample all over.
Let me know when those gay couples go out of their way to target a christian bakery again, and ignore the muslim ones(who also wouldn't bake them a cake).
Man, I don't know what insurance you're talking about, but we fork over about $500/month
For around $300/mo in Canada, I can get all of what you're talking about with 80% payment by green shield or blue cross. Drop it to 60-70% and it nearly halves the cost with no upper limit. If you're paying that much and you're in the US, well it sure didn't get any better after Obamacare managed to drive the insurance rates right through the roof. I should know, several of my neighbors down in FL who weren't on medicaid and lost their insurance were in very tight spots and/or ended up selling their homes and going into a nursing home.
How are loot boxes different than collectible card game sets or grab-bag sales at school fundraisers?
Digital vs physical. You're getting something that has value from a CCG or grab-bag. With a digital lootbox there's not intrinsic value beyond what's in the game, and in many cases they can't be sold/traded/etc. In many cases the odds for CCG's have to be displayed, not so for digital. I think China, Japan and S.Korea are the only countries that require the actual odds listed on the lootbox right now.
But most importantly, they are extremely annoying and distracting. And many sites now even force the damn things to FOLLOW the user while they are trying to read an article!
You'd think after the pop-up/under/etc bullshit, that sites would realize that there's some stuff that will actually drive users away from your site. But nope! There's always someone that thinks it's the hottest, trendiest, newest and greatest thing since web2.0(or whatever it is now), and everyone has to do it!
It's like it won't cause people to use adblockers if the ad's start screaming at you or something...
I'm definitely not knowledgeable on it, similar to you just dealing with multiple family members over 30+ years, one of my sisters is type 1, and had a great aunt and aunt on my fathers side who developed type 2. Just like anything else, you pick some stuff up and the rest you have to stay abreast with because of various reasons.
No. It doesn't. The historical and modern records agree.
Really? That's why various climatologists have been caught fudging data by cherry picking samples from specific cores that paint a particular picture.
That's funny, I only remember denialists cherry-picking short periods for that purpose over and over again.
That's funny too, because I remember alarmist screeching that everything causes global warming from the ham sandwich to sex.
All the models agree we're fucked, the only thing they disagree on is how fast we're going to all realize it.
Would that be like all those models that are now in disagreement too? What? You don't know that there's now a growing disagreement on all those models.
Say it with me, son: weather is not climate. It is influenced by climate. Why is this so difficult for you and yours to grasp? Oh yeah, because if you do, you might have to behave differently, and that's the one thing you cannot accept.
Say it with me: Why is it so difficult that you fully missed the point? I'll give you a hint, go back and re-read that sentence you quoted, then read it context. You'll figure out where you went wrong.
So what you're saying is you know fuck-all about diabetes. Got it. I'm not OP, but maybe at least read the wiki.
Don't read the wiki, it's full of stuff that's not medically recognized like "type 3" and "type 1.5" among other garbage. There's only three types 1, 2 and gestational(pregnant women), everything else has it's own diagnosis standard and despite the people pushing for LADA(adult onset) to become a new one. It's still type 1 even if you develop it in adulthood, the treatments are the same, the precautions are the same. If they were paying $1k/mo they were likely paying for a brand new drug, where a combination of 2 medications would have only run them $60/mo. The farce with liraglutide is a good example. $1k/mo, but could be done with two drugs.
This happens a lot when sales reps push doctors to use "new" medications because they're obviously better, and safer, that's what they're saying and you best believe it! Ever wonder why the vast majority of reps are stunningly pretty women who were hired based on their looks not their background? I'll give ya a hint, it's because male or female both respond to the tactic.
No he shouldn't. The only reason he "knows" so much about that particular time and imprisonment practices is because it's one of his "they enslaved white people too" memes. Mashiki is a vehement racist, particularly funny since he rocks that Japanese name.
Or...or...it could be that you're an actual racist, since that's what you are focusing on. The reason that I happen to know is because one of my hobbies is the commonweath history of eastern canada.
To the other AC: I have no interest in writing anything for wikipedia. Even if you can prove something factually correct, they have a much greater desire to present particular narratives. On top of that they've gone from "presenting verifiable fact" to "presenting 2nd and 3rd sources" of any kind as fact. A good example would be the spectre and meltdown articles on there currently.
It's just after the bit where stealing women and raping them is cleared as OK and just before the bit where the she-bears kill 40 kids for making fun of a bald guy.
Well that was the *old testament* real wrath of god type stuff, so you should expect that. Then they got all cranky in Europe, had a reformation(s) and decided it wasn't so great anymore. But it hasn't got that far with Islam, just look at all those people who supported ISIS and whatnot, or tried arguing before the courts that raping women is allowed because their religion says so. Might only take another few hundred years before that's fixed, providing of course they don't change the "this is the true word of god, and questioning it is forbidden" and "changing it makes you an apostate and you need to be put to death" stuff first. Might be sooner, but probably not.
Oh come on now. That's just because they couldn't dump them in the colonies anymore, they were still doing that in Upper and Lower Canada and the colonial state of Newfoundland. Despite what the wikipedia article says, the crown was still shipping them to north america until the very late 1700's(round about 1795ish), but only into lands "just far enough" to not make it an issue for the newly founded US. See there was even a trick to it, they would declare the prisoners being sent to an "unknown location" and then basically dump them in the territory or colonial state. Who'd then be responsible for well...everything, from feeding to housing, and so on while it "was in dispute with the crown." And that could take years, and in the mean time the prisoners would/could be forced onto a plantation while arguing with the crown over it.
Lot's of bits of history like that which really doesn't get fully covered. Here's an example from 1789, also covers some other stuff but worth the reading.
Those wikipedia articles are terrible. Give it a few more days and there will be full blown citeogenisis going on with references to some article written by a hipster on mashable or vox.
Because it was run by imperialist asshats. Not a very nuanced analysis, I know, but basically correct.
So you're saying that the current state of the problems in the UK is because it was run by "imperialist asshats?" In the last 15 years...
Er, no, you are mistaken. Hurt feelings alone are never enough to curtail rights.
You mean where you've defended curtailing peoples rights for hurt feelings didn't happen? Have you changed your belief now that you're experiencing the heavy hand of the state?
Not sure what you mean by that. They threw bricks at my house because they thought I was an Arab... I'm not, I'm half white British and half Asian, but you know how dumb these racists usually are. I really don't see the similarity.
Most people can tell the difference between an arab and a not-arab. More likely you managed to piss someone off to the point where they stalked you and you got a brick through your window for your trouble. If your online personality is anything to go by, you'd project an in-general unlikable meat space personality. Then again, you could always try the "assimilate" route. My background is White-Japanese, and I don't identify as "Canadian and half-asian or "white-asian" I identify as Canadian, unfortunately the progressive left sees nothing but skin colour.
Suppose we don't have to suppose, because we're there already.
You mean it doesn't have to do with the fact that we're measuring in more places, more often, all of the time? Instead of the just occasionally some of the time? I mean come on now, we've already seen in the past with cherry picking of samples to "prove" global warming. Or the fact that more people happen to live in areas prone to "worse weather" that makes them think that the end is neigh. If you lived in Southern Ontario right now, you'd be thinking that. 2 weeks ago it was -23C. It was +9C yesterday. It's -6C outside right now. 3 years ago, we had more rain then snow. 5 years ago, there were places that had 7m of snow in a 24hr period with the lakes frozen over. 13ish years ago, they were screeching that the great lakes were going to dry up, last year they were limiting the flow from rivers into the lakes to try and avoid flooding in cities along the lakes.
I guess that's the thing you new-day global warming cultists don't get. Many people accept that there's "climate change" what people are disputing are the shit tier models, and then the screeching by people like yourself that anyone who dares to question it, is a denialist. It really "isn't that bad" or did you forget that the settlements in the 1500's and 1600's, the winters were so cold that entire settlements were wiped out simply from the weather. As far south as where DC is today, and in the span of less then 60 years, it became so warm that that malaria was common as far north as Upper Canada.
It's not the small tube that get's some people, it's the click-wirrrrrrrr-click, snap, click,click,click while in the small tube. Didn't bother me either, I ended up nicely dozing off during my head MRI. It is very distressing on a lot of kids though, so some of the first places to get those open MRI machines were sick-kids hospitals.
Funny thing about all that tar. If you're a welder and smoker, the chances of getting lung cancer are decreased. Same thing if you worked in mines before the various safety standards came into play. Or say worked a shit job where most of your time was standing over vats of sulfuric acid used in various industry processes.
To be fair, the "political purpose" of the great SJW invasion was to stop bombs falling on us. Also, I seem to recall that American SJWs joined in. Are you okay with that?
Maybe you should ask yourself why your country helped draft a plan that created the situation in the first place?
No, no, I want to go to a different system, not the same one. One with less surveillance, more freedom. For example I think there is possibility I might need euthanasia services in future, and the UK doesn't allow them.
That doesn't make sense, since you regularly post that peoples rights should be curtailed because it hurts your feelings. Most countries don't allow suicide like that, and for good reason. You can see the slippery slope in several EU countries where that already happened.
Oh, and not getting bricks through my windows, sent by xenophobes and racists. I know they are only trying to help me by gifting free replacement bricks for my old house, but it's kind of annoying.
Maybe you should be asking the question why that happened in the first place, it wasn't based on fault of your own. But rather due to the fault of other people who are similar to you, and government policies that looked the other way.
Well, my granddad was a Nazi-puncher back during the great SJW invasion of Europe in 1944, so maybe I'm biased.
So despite your denial that you advocate for political violence to enact political change, you're now once again in agreement that you're okay with using violence for political purposes.
So all this protesting about not wanting any of that stuff is actually just cover for me really wanting it, except that actually it turns out I don't want it... This is getting more confusing than Pizzagate.
You mean this part? " So anyway, I'm leaving, going somewhere that suits my leftist progressive socio-commie philosophy better." Which you already have...and want to flee to another country where you can live exactly under the same system you already have.
Pizzagate on the otherhand is simple, kind of like how your government covered up the mass rapes of young girls, and of Jimmy Savile. The only difference between the two is that "pizzagate" is in the "but there's a whole pile of circumstantial stuff" just like "there was a whole pile of circumstantial stuff, with Savile 40+ yeas ago and the mass-rapes and child prostitution 10+ years ago."
Nope. Because the DNC just finished electing Tom "More of the same" Perez and Keith "black ethnostates are best ethnostates" Ellison. In other words, nothing has changed except and this is using the progressive/left rhetoric, they also placed a genuine nazi into a position of power.
You obviously know nothing about the UK except the twisted version you see on RT.
What the AC says: "The mainstream press, telegraph, independent, spectator, bbc, dailymail, etc., are RT." Obviously I know nothing, except what the UK media itself says.
There was a lot of debate before that, and it was dominated by Nigel Farage fanning the flames of racism. There was no reasonable discussion, just blame thrown at the immigrants.
You mean it didn't have anything to do with the police and government turning a blind eye to immigrants raping young white girls? Or "sharia only" zones being pushed by muslims? Or a decade or so of an muslim preacher openly agitating terrorism in the UK? Or on, and on and on? Where people rightly or wrongly feel like they've become foreigners in their own city?
If you want debate in Britain, just talk to Jo Cox about it. That's right, she cannot talk since she was assassinated just before the Brexit vote, and for what ? For being moderate and not joining the chorus of voices blaming the immigrants.
No, not being moderate. Because the government was and is failing it's own citizens, and someone had enough and killed her. Her death was a direct result of policies by the government in the UK over the years. I'm not saying it's correct, right, or anything else. But you're failing to see that there is an undercurrent in the UK where some people see no hope. Some people are able to flee, head to other countries. Others on the other hand see the government as the enemy because the government has done things to make itself their enemy. And the more that the government pushes against people, and they silence people, and the police act as cenors? The worse it will get.
This is fundamentally different then people who are agitating for a new political order. This is what the breakdown in the social contract looks like and the start of a societies collapse looks like.
Remember that the people demanding you "accept" Trump are the same ones that spent 8 years trying to defame Obama by demanding his birth certificate (even when one was provided, they wouldn't let it go).
Would that be Clinton, Russians or the right-wing? Despite the fact-checkers best efforts, and WAPO scrubbing their own article from 2008(you can find plenty of backlinks and copies) and other sites like the guardian who are all in agreement that it started under the Clinton camp when she was losing to Obama, and it was a last-ditch attempt to sway primary supporters. But the whole birther thing wasn't right-wing, just like 9/11 was an inside job wasn't wholly left-wing, or vaccines cause autism was wholly rich upperclass idiots.
Personally, no leader deserves automatic support. I say judge a leader by their actions... Trump has not performed well there either.
True, but if Trump hasn't preformed well what would you call the Obama administration? Because to an outsider, Obama operated like a dictator in a banana republic and his policies were so damaging to the world in general that he managed to surpass Bush's adventure into Iraq, and that's saying something. Not only did they destabilize 3 countries, but the entire EU while he was at it, but he also managed to create a massive new terrorist organization that paled to aL-queda in terms of cruelty, but then destabilized another country which has created an entirely new slave-trade in Libya. He used EO's as a tool of fiat control, and tried to bypass both the house and senate to do it. It's one of the reasons DACA is where it is now, and why so many people are vehemently against any form of amnesty. And it boils down into three camps: They can get in line like everyone else. They can be deported and pay the price for their parents stupidity and belief that democrats would somehow wrangle another 1986 amnesty which never stopped(California courts are still granting amnesty to people who weren't even in the country or born). And the oh but those poor children, we should just give them what they want and to hell with the people who are still waiting.
That's not even touching on his economic policies which he touted as the 1% GDP as the "new normal" or millions of people who couldn't afford health insurance anymore or lost it completely.
Yes, I definitely wasn't joking. Nothing gets past you.
Your past post history says you aren't joking. Or did you forget all those times when you defended "punching nazis" in your own comments?
That's why I'm leaving, I have everything I want and am completely happy with the UK, it fits my personal beliefs perfectly. That makes complete sense. Your assumptions are, as always, spot on.
That's not an assumption, it's observable based on your comments, your stances, your views. You've gotten a happy little taste of the paradise that you want, and suddenly you don't like it. But you're more then happy to travel to another country and spread the same views that got you there in the first place.
Slashdot Mirror
The universe is very similar to Shadowrun, which is probably why it tickled the fancy of a lot of people.
From the hardcore SW geeks(like myself) Star Wars was terrible. It's a "okay space opera" it's a "okay non-SW cannon movie" but anything else it's just well terrible. And you'd find that most of us would have been happier without Space Mary Poppins and the ignoble death of Admiral Ackbar, or the shoehorning of nobody characters that were one dimensional, and garbage like "but I SAVED YOU!" as Finn decides to try and save the rebel base. The movie itself was terrible, it didn't even do a full run in China which is a big market. It lasted 2 weeks, with a ~92% drop off in week 2. Hell, if you really need to see how badly the movie is doing, they're already selling the toys for $1. If they'd turned around and used the EU cannon material of Thrawn, Mara Jade, and so on? You'd be seeing people cheer from the rafters, because not only is there a line of continuation, but the characters have more depth the Rey "thy Mary Sue" Super-force User and it likely wouldn't be such a flat movie.
The problem is Disney and the team of writers decided to pull the "fuck the hardcore fan" we'll make it for everyone else. And it failed just as badly as the Ghostbusters remake. Hell the media followed the same script: "It's not *our* fault it was, bad. It's all those alt-right trolls! Look even more trolls! That's why it's bad. NO REALLY TROLLS!" They're still doubling down on it at this moment, but I'll bet if I was a fly on the wall in the head office of Disney there would be an awful lot of worry, and attempts to push the entire team of writers and so on right out the door to try and salvage the franchise. And if you think TLJ is just an isolated incident? The new Han Solo movie has also been going through extensive rewrites, re-filming of scenes, and the main actor is apparently so wooden that they had to have an acting coach on scene. Don't be surprised if the new Han Solo movie bombs that Disney "put's it on the shelf" for a few years.
The christians in trumps government seem to be intent on rolling back as many health reforms for women and removing equality for all because their religion says so to show that some christians still haven't entered the 20th century yet.
Repeating that meme doesn't make it true. Seems more like you're happier with the state/religion separation only working one way, where under those guaranteed rights businesses, charities, and so on also have protections. So do the people working for them, and in some cases people work for/volunteer for particular morals. Something that various left-wing progressive groups have been very happy to trample all over.
Let me know when those gay couples go out of their way to target a christian bakery again, and ignore the muslim ones(who also wouldn't bake them a cake).
Man, I don't know what insurance you're talking about, but we fork over about $500/month
For around $300/mo in Canada, I can get all of what you're talking about with 80% payment by green shield or blue cross. Drop it to 60-70% and it nearly halves the cost with no upper limit. If you're paying that much and you're in the US, well it sure didn't get any better after Obamacare managed to drive the insurance rates right through the roof. I should know, several of my neighbors down in FL who weren't on medicaid and lost their insurance were in very tight spots and/or ended up selling their homes and going into a nursing home.
How are loot boxes different than collectible card game sets or grab-bag sales at school fundraisers?
Digital vs physical. You're getting something that has value from a CCG or grab-bag. With a digital lootbox there's not intrinsic value beyond what's in the game, and in many cases they can't be sold/traded/etc. In many cases the odds for CCG's have to be displayed, not so for digital. I think China, Japan and S.Korea are the only countries that require the actual odds listed on the lootbox right now.
But most importantly, they are extremely annoying and distracting. And many sites now even force the damn things to FOLLOW the user while they are trying to read an article!
You'd think after the pop-up/under/etc bullshit, that sites would realize that there's some stuff that will actually drive users away from your site. But nope! There's always someone that thinks it's the hottest, trendiest, newest and greatest thing since web2.0(or whatever it is now), and everyone has to do it!
It's like it won't cause people to use adblockers if the ad's start screaming at you or something...
I'm definitely not knowledgeable on it, similar to you just dealing with multiple family members over 30+ years, one of my sisters is type 1, and had a great aunt and aunt on my fathers side who developed type 2. Just like anything else, you pick some stuff up and the rest you have to stay abreast with because of various reasons.
No. It doesn't. The historical and modern records agree.
Really? That's why various climatologists have been caught fudging data by cherry picking samples from specific cores that paint a particular picture.
That's funny, I only remember denialists cherry-picking short periods for that purpose over and over again.
That's funny too, because I remember alarmist screeching that everything causes global warming from the ham sandwich to sex.
All the models agree we're fucked, the only thing they disagree on is how fast we're going to all realize it.
Would that be like all those models that are now in disagreement too? What? You don't know that there's now a growing disagreement on all those models.
Say it with me, son: weather is not climate. It is influenced by climate. Why is this so difficult for you and yours to grasp? Oh yeah, because if you do, you might have to behave differently, and that's the one thing you cannot accept.
Say it with me: Why is it so difficult that you fully missed the point? I'll give you a hint, go back and re-read that sentence you quoted, then read it context. You'll figure out where you went wrong.
So what you're saying is you know fuck-all about diabetes. Got it. I'm not OP, but maybe at least read the wiki.
Don't read the wiki, it's full of stuff that's not medically recognized like "type 3" and "type 1.5" among other garbage. There's only three types 1, 2 and gestational(pregnant women), everything else has it's own diagnosis standard and despite the people pushing for LADA(adult onset) to become a new one. It's still type 1 even if you develop it in adulthood, the treatments are the same, the precautions are the same. If they were paying $1k/mo they were likely paying for a brand new drug, where a combination of 2 medications would have only run them $60/mo. The farce with liraglutide is a good example. $1k/mo, but could be done with two drugs.
This happens a lot when sales reps push doctors to use "new" medications because they're obviously better, and safer, that's what they're saying and you best believe it! Ever wonder why the vast majority of reps are stunningly pretty women who were hired based on their looks not their background? I'll give ya a hint, it's because male or female both respond to the tactic.
No he shouldn't. The only reason he "knows" so much about that particular time and imprisonment practices is because it's one of his "they enslaved white people too" memes. Mashiki is a vehement racist, particularly funny since he rocks that Japanese name.
Or...or...it could be that you're an actual racist, since that's what you are focusing on. The reason that I happen to know is because one of my hobbies is the commonweath history of eastern canada.
To the other AC: I have no interest in writing anything for wikipedia. Even if you can prove something factually correct, they have a much greater desire to present particular narratives. On top of that they've gone from "presenting verifiable fact" to "presenting 2nd and 3rd sources" of any kind as fact. A good example would be the spectre and meltdown articles on there currently.
It's just after the bit where stealing women and raping them is cleared as OK and just before the bit where the she-bears kill 40 kids for making fun of a bald guy.
Well that was the *old testament* real wrath of god type stuff, so you should expect that. Then they got all cranky in Europe, had a reformation(s) and decided it wasn't so great anymore. But it hasn't got that far with Islam, just look at all those people who supported ISIS and whatnot, or tried arguing before the courts that raping women is allowed because their religion says so. Might only take another few hundred years before that's fixed, providing of course they don't change the "this is the true word of god, and questioning it is forbidden" and "changing it makes you an apostate and you need to be put to death" stuff first. Might be sooner, but probably not.
Oh come on now. That's just because they couldn't dump them in the colonies anymore, they were still doing that in Upper and Lower Canada and the colonial state of Newfoundland. Despite what the wikipedia article says, the crown was still shipping them to north america until the very late 1700's(round about 1795ish), but only into lands "just far enough" to not make it an issue for the newly founded US. See there was even a trick to it, they would declare the prisoners being sent to an "unknown location" and then basically dump them in the territory or colonial state. Who'd then be responsible for well...everything, from feeding to housing, and so on while it "was in dispute with the crown." And that could take years, and in the mean time the prisoners would/could be forced onto a plantation while arguing with the crown over it.
Lot's of bits of history like that which really doesn't get fully covered. Here's an example from 1789, also covers some other stuff but worth the reading.
Those wikipedia articles are terrible. Give it a few more days and there will be full blown citeogenisis going on with references to some article written by a hipster on mashable or vox.
Because it was run by imperialist asshats. Not a very nuanced analysis, I know, but basically correct.
So you're saying that the current state of the problems in the UK is because it was run by "imperialist asshats?" In the last 15 years...
Er, no, you are mistaken. Hurt feelings alone are never enough to curtail rights.
You mean where you've defended curtailing peoples rights for hurt feelings didn't happen? Have you changed your belief now that you're experiencing the heavy hand of the state?
Not sure what you mean by that. They threw bricks at my house because they thought I was an Arab... I'm not, I'm half white British and half Asian, but you know how dumb these racists usually are. I really don't see the similarity.
Most people can tell the difference between an arab and a not-arab. More likely you managed to piss someone off to the point where they stalked you and you got a brick through your window for your trouble. If your online personality is anything to go by, you'd project an in-general unlikable meat space personality. Then again, you could always try the "assimilate" route. My background is White-Japanese, and I don't identify as "Canadian and half-asian or "white-asian" I identify as Canadian, unfortunately the progressive left sees nothing but skin colour.
Suppose we don't have to suppose, because we're there already.
You mean it doesn't have to do with the fact that we're measuring in more places, more often, all of the time? Instead of the just occasionally some of the time? I mean come on now, we've already seen in the past with cherry picking of samples to "prove" global warming. Or the fact that more people happen to live in areas prone to "worse weather" that makes them think that the end is neigh. If you lived in Southern Ontario right now, you'd be thinking that. 2 weeks ago it was -23C. It was +9C yesterday. It's -6C outside right now. 3 years ago, we had more rain then snow. 5 years ago, there were places that had 7m of snow in a 24hr period with the lakes frozen over. 13ish years ago, they were screeching that the great lakes were going to dry up, last year they were limiting the flow from rivers into the lakes to try and avoid flooding in cities along the lakes.
I guess that's the thing you new-day global warming cultists don't get. Many people accept that there's "climate change" what people are disputing are the shit tier models, and then the screeching by people like yourself that anyone who dares to question it, is a denialist. It really "isn't that bad" or did you forget that the settlements in the 1500's and 1600's, the winters were so cold that entire settlements were wiped out simply from the weather. As far south as where DC is today, and in the span of less then 60 years, it became so warm that that malaria was common as far north as Upper Canada.
It's not the small tube that get's some people, it's the click-wirrrrrrrr-click, snap, click,click,click while in the small tube. Didn't bother me either, I ended up nicely dozing off during my head MRI. It is very distressing on a lot of kids though, so some of the first places to get those open MRI machines were sick-kids hospitals.
You probably forgot about due to your ridiculously short millenial attention span.
Note that UID? I was born before millennials were even a twinkle in their parents eye.
All that tar is tasty.
(according to Marlboro Man)
Funny thing about all that tar. If you're a welder and smoker, the chances of getting lung cancer are decreased. Same thing if you worked in mines before the various safety standards came into play. Or say worked a shit job where most of your time was standing over vats of sulfuric acid used in various industry processes.
To be fair, the "political purpose" of the great SJW invasion was to stop bombs falling on us. Also, I seem to recall that American SJWs joined in. Are you okay with that?
Maybe you should ask yourself why your country helped draft a plan that created the situation in the first place?
No, no, I want to go to a different system, not the same one. One with less surveillance, more freedom. For example I think there is possibility I might need euthanasia services in future, and the UK doesn't allow them.
That doesn't make sense, since you regularly post that peoples rights should be curtailed because it hurts your feelings. Most countries don't allow suicide like that, and for good reason. You can see the slippery slope in several EU countries where that already happened.
Oh, and not getting bricks through my windows, sent by xenophobes and racists. I know they are only trying to help me by gifting free replacement bricks for my old house, but it's kind of annoying.
Maybe you should be asking the question why that happened in the first place, it wasn't based on fault of your own. But rather due to the fault of other people who are similar to you, and government policies that looked the other way.
Well, my granddad was a Nazi-puncher back during the great SJW invasion of Europe in 1944, so maybe I'm biased.
So despite your denial that you advocate for political violence to enact political change, you're now once again in agreement that you're okay with using violence for political purposes.
So all this protesting about not wanting any of that stuff is actually just cover for me really wanting it, except that actually it turns out I don't want it... This is getting more confusing than Pizzagate.
You mean this part? " So anyway, I'm leaving, going somewhere that suits my leftist progressive socio-commie philosophy better." Which you already have...and want to flee to another country where you can live exactly under the same system you already have.
Pizzagate on the otherhand is simple, kind of like how your government covered up the mass rapes of young girls, and of Jimmy Savile. The only difference between the two is that "pizzagate" is in the "but there's a whole pile of circumstantial stuff" just like "there was a whole pile of circumstantial stuff, with Savile 40+ yeas ago and the mass-rapes and child prostitution 10+ years ago."
Nope. Because the DNC just finished electing Tom "More of the same" Perez and Keith "black ethnostates are best ethnostates" Ellison. In other words, nothing has changed except and this is using the progressive/left rhetoric, they also placed a genuine nazi into a position of power.
You obviously know nothing about the UK except the twisted version you see on RT.
What the AC says: "The mainstream press, telegraph, independent, spectator, bbc, dailymail, etc., are RT." Obviously I know nothing, except what the UK media itself says.
There was a lot of debate before that, and it was dominated by Nigel Farage fanning the flames of racism. There was no reasonable discussion, just blame thrown at the immigrants.
You mean it didn't have anything to do with the police and government turning a blind eye to immigrants raping young white girls? Or "sharia only" zones being pushed by muslims? Or a decade or so of an muslim preacher openly agitating terrorism in the UK? Or on, and on and on? Where people rightly or wrongly feel like they've become foreigners in their own city?
If you want debate in Britain, just talk to Jo Cox about it. That's right, she cannot talk since she was assassinated just before the Brexit vote, and for what ? For being moderate and not joining the chorus of voices blaming the immigrants.
No, not being moderate. Because the government was and is failing it's own citizens, and someone had enough and killed her. Her death was a direct result of policies by the government in the UK over the years. I'm not saying it's correct, right, or anything else. But you're failing to see that there is an undercurrent in the UK where some people see no hope. Some people are able to flee, head to other countries. Others on the other hand see the government as the enemy because the government has done things to make itself their enemy. And the more that the government pushes against people, and they silence people, and the police act as cenors? The worse it will get.
This is fundamentally different then people who are agitating for a new political order. This is what the breakdown in the social contract looks like and the start of a societies collapse looks like.
Remember that the people demanding you "accept" Trump are the same ones that spent 8 years trying to defame Obama by demanding his birth certificate (even when one was provided, they wouldn't let it go).
Would that be Clinton, Russians or the right-wing? Despite the fact-checkers best efforts, and WAPO scrubbing their own article from 2008(you can find plenty of backlinks and copies) and other sites like the guardian who are all in agreement that it started under the Clinton camp when she was losing to Obama, and it was a last-ditch attempt to sway primary supporters. But the whole birther thing wasn't right-wing, just like 9/11 was an inside job wasn't wholly left-wing, or vaccines cause autism was wholly rich upperclass idiots.
Personally, no leader deserves automatic support. I say judge a leader by their actions... Trump has not performed well there either.
True, but if Trump hasn't preformed well what would you call the Obama administration? Because to an outsider, Obama operated like a dictator in a banana republic and his policies were so damaging to the world in general that he managed to surpass Bush's adventure into Iraq, and that's saying something. Not only did they destabilize 3 countries, but the entire EU while he was at it, but he also managed to create a massive new terrorist organization that paled to aL-queda in terms of cruelty, but then destabilized another country which has created an entirely new slave-trade in Libya. He used EO's as a tool of fiat control, and tried to bypass both the house and senate to do it. It's one of the reasons DACA is where it is now, and why so many people are vehemently against any form of amnesty. And it boils down into three camps: They can get in line like everyone else. They can be deported and pay the price for their parents stupidity and belief that democrats would somehow wrangle another 1986 amnesty which never stopped(California courts are still granting amnesty to people who weren't even in the country or born). And the oh but those poor children, we should just give them what they want and to hell with the people who are still waiting.
That's not even touching on his economic policies which he touted as the 1% GDP as the "new normal" or millions of people who couldn't afford health insurance anymore or lost it completely.
Yes, I definitely wasn't joking. Nothing gets past you.
Your past post history says you aren't joking. Or did you forget all those times when you defended "punching nazis" in your own comments?
That's why I'm leaving, I have everything I want and am completely happy with the UK, it fits my personal beliefs perfectly. That makes complete sense. Your assumptions are, as always, spot on.
That's not an assumption, it's observable based on your comments, your stances, your views. You've gotten a happy little taste of the paradise that you want, and suddenly you don't like it. But you're more then happy to travel to another country and spread the same views that got you there in the first place.