Slashdot Mirror


User: Mashiki

Mashiki's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9,914
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9,914

  1. Re:Symbol adopted by racist sacks of shit on Pepe Is Banned From the Apple App Store (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    Don't worry. I'm sure you can tell us now why Laci Green is a gender traitor and why she needs to be purged from the annal of feminist literature.

  2. Re:Symbol adopted by racist sacks of shit on Pepe Is Banned From the Apple App Store (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    What about Richard Spencer who was wearing a pin of Pepe when he got famously punched in the face on camera? Just a conincidence im sure.

    He can wear whatever he wants. But if you want to use that line of reasoning, liberals and progressives are being very well represented by the events at evergreen college and the riots at Berkeley.

    What about the tons of pepe meme I find on alt right facebook groups?
    You mean besides the people that use them in order to piss you off so you become a foaming mouth breather who's batshit insane? Seems to be working.

    Are we just arguing that these people aren't racist shitbags?

    They're not, they're trolling you. And it's why Trump is going to win a second term, the left have done more in the last 6mo drive people fro the left to center and center-right then anything else could have. I personally can't wait to see where it ends up. But considering the left already broke down into violence? I'm guessing that'll be their next attempt again.

    Are we just arguing that these people aren't racist shitbags.

  3. Re:Symbol adopted by racist sacks of shit on Pepe Is Banned From the Apple App Store (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    AKA you're showing the world you're actual a bigot, and they're all laughing at you.

  4. Re:"mounting scrutiny of ties" on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    That was you, here it is:
    I disagreed very strongly with that statement of yours.
    You've now twisted that strong disagreement into some sort of agreement that there is a race called muslim or some other bizzare shit - talk about getting things backwards and inside out!

    No, I stated what came from the royal report over rotherham. Perhaps you're too stupid to get it?

  5. Comey never confirmed interference in the Clinton investigation by anybody. What he said is that the Clinton's meeting with Lynch, the leader of the DOJ, tarnished the ability of the DOJ to credibly lead the investigation.

    The second that Lynch uttered those words to Comey, she had already interfered with the investigation. What comey did by not reporting it up the chain or leaking it to the press was to throw the entire DOJ into disrepute.

    That was direct interference, if you don't think otherwise you've never studied a day of law in your life.

  6. Re: Symbol adopted by racist sacks of shit on Pepe Is Banned From the Apple App Store (vice.com) · · Score: 1

    The transfer of the KKK to the Republicans was a result of the Republican "Southern Strategy" to strip political support from the Democrats in the South.

    Which of course really explains why democrats continue to push segregation, and identity politicos are core party values right?

  7. To bad your guy is such a crook that he makes this look like small potatoes?

    "Such a crook" that a previous administration's justice department meddled in the investigative process of a presidential candidate, during a political campaign, which directly and dramatically changed the outcome of the election? Oh on top of that he committed perjury? Remember when he said "that nothing happened." I'd be very worried if I was in his shoes(unless he's going to sing), and I'd also be very worried if I was: Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch, and possibly Obama along with other former members of the DOJ and FBI.

  8. Re: There is a difference on Former FBI Director Admitted He Was the Source Of At Least One Leak To the Press (theoutline.com) · · Score: 1, Troll

    Comey also just declared under oath that the former head of the DOJ directly interfered in his investigation. On top of that Comey also said there was no investigation into Trump regarding Russia. And the actual testimony didn't say that Trump asked him to drop the Flynn investigation. He asked for it to "go away" he didn't order him to stop it. That wording is the difference, you can try and split hairs however you want but all this actually did was implicate the previous administration in subverting justice and if I was Loretta Lynch, I'd be very worried right now that a special prosecutor is going to be named.

  9. Re:"mounting scrutiny of ties" on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Remember that part where you implied that religion = race? No? don't worry you did remember? Remember the part where I told you that in the past like with rotherham the reason nothing happened was because multiple authorities didn't do anything for fear of being labeled racist? Apparently you did forget.

  10. You mean the part where he confirmed that the Obama DOJ(Lynch) directly interfered with the investigation into Hillary? Yep, much lying, much obstructing.

  11. Re:"mounting scrutiny of ties" on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Where did I suggest that? By the way what race is muslim again since you're so strong in your belief that a religion is muslim.

  12. Going by that reasoning, NYT is the same. When people know it's not.

  13. You got Democrat and Republican backwards. Politico has a very long history of going out of their way to defend democrats from anything and everything, they were even started by ex-WAPO people. It's a beltway organization aka stacked with people who have progressive beliefs. If you want pro-republican you need to start with the daily caller.

  14. Re:Trump deserves the same treatment as Winner on Edward Snowden On Trump Administration's Recent Arrest of an Alleged Journalistic Source (freedom.press) · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  15. Re: "mounting scrutiny of ties" on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    maybe you should read the following and re-assess the character of your president

    If by president you mean prime minister, and if by prime minster you mean Justin Trudeau. I guess I will. Or, I could simply make my point that US and world media is so unhinged along with the average anti-trumper that they need tranquilizers.

  16. Re:"mounting scrutiny of ties" on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it wasn't "his job". No one on the foreign relations committee meets with ambassadors

    You're repeating bullshit, sounds like you're a paid troll, maybe for Claire McCaskill. Yet another member of of the "foreign relations committee" who's met with multiple ambassadors including the russian amabassador, and french, and british, and german. Oh would you look at that? I guess we'd better start an indepth investigation to see if McCaskill is actually a russian agent. It would be such a shame for the democrats if that was to happen wouldn't it....

    Then again this appears to be a much bigger scandal. Especially since Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the capital police and tried to directly interfere with a criminal investigation. Oh boy, just what have the democrats really gotten themselves into...

  17. Re: "mounting scrutiny of ties" on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 0

    LOL. Oh, you actuallly believe trump hasnt been bought by the swamp ? let me laugh even louder : HAHAHAHAHAH !!!

    Considering the media is still acting like someone with rabies and is schizophrenic, the chances that he hasn't been bought is still pretty good. Then again it could simply be that the media *really* is in Trump's tank, and by acting this insane they're going to get him elected for another 4 years. As it stands now he likely will be, simply because "fly over country" will want to jam their fist into the elitists mouths.

  18. Re:The best thing that happened to Comey... on Trump Nominates Lawyer To Lead FBI (bbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Sure explains why so many progressives keep saying that there's no free speech problem on campuses that multiple states are now writing laws to specifically protect conservatives from progressives and liberals. Man, someone should let Evergreen College know post-stat, maybe then they could get back to work instead of having all the intersectional whatever's threatening white students, professors, and so on.

  19. Re:Healthy reminder on Wikimedia Executives Receive Six-figure Golden Handshakes (theregister.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    The only site beating wikipedia for not being neutral is rationalwiki.

  20. Re:So in other words, ban porn? on After London Attack, PM Calls For Internet Regulation To Fight Terrorists (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    1/3 isn't bad, but I'd turn around and try again if you really want to clean up that gibberish. Let me know when you read this as well, wait until you get to the part where the police and local councils did nothing because of the fear of being labeled racist.

  21. Re:So in other words, ban porn? on After London Attack, PM Calls For Internet Regulation To Fight Terrorists (cnn.com) · · Score: 1
  22. Re:Not blind - I can see what you are doing on After London Attack, PM Calls For Internet Regulation To Fight Terrorists (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Let's quote your own words to see why I wrote that:

    And that moment that you're too dense to realize that the politically correct amok have been pushing "muslim = race" for over a decade, and in turn people are afraid of being labeled racist?

    By the stupid argument you are attempting (which race is muslim again) no white supremicists are racist, and it also contradicts your claim that people are scared about being seen as racist as well. You are trying to take it both ways and attempting to blame me for something that is your own mistake if it's a mistake at all.

    One thing showing your bit of filth as bullshit is that several people in Barking did report on one of the perpetrators before the act and were not scared of being seen as being racists in doing so.

    You mean the fact that I'm reporting on reality? Kinda like all up and down the UK where girls were forced into sex gangs and traded like cheap toys and people were afraid of being labeled as racist and that was the reason that they didn't call police? And when they did call the police, the police refused to do anything for fear of having themselves labeled as racist? Or the town councils were afraid of being labeled racist so they told the police to do nothing?

    I made no mistake. Either you're ignorant of what's been going on and haven't read commission reports, or royal commission reports. Or you're so young that you're just learning about this stuff for the first time.

    And the police didn't pick them up despite having actual evidence that they were a ticking bomb to boot. $20 says that when the inquiry happens it'll be another case of "the police were afraid to do so because they'd be labeled racist." You're welcome to come back and visit this comment in 9mo or so.

  23. Re:So in other words, ban porn? on After London Attack, PM Calls For Internet Regulation To Fight Terrorists (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Personally, I couldn't care less what they believe so long as they behave themselves.

    That's the thing now isn't it. They aren't behaving themselves, they're actively advocating and implementing things that are contrary to the civilization that they live in. Some of them are now going as far to advocate attacks against that same civilization. And when people decide to go and do those attacks, large swaths of the people who believe this ignore that it happened, or silently or openly express support for what they did.

  24. Re:Not blind - I can see what you are doing on After London Attack, PM Calls For Internet Regulation To Fight Terrorists (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Didn't say that, go back and read. When you're finished you can read this as well. Now when you're done, you can think on this. Why is it that the UK is more interested in denying entry to someone like Pamela Geller, but can't detain people who are on video saying they want to kill the kafir.

  25. Re:Not blind - I can see what you are doing on After London Attack, PM Calls For Internet Regulation To Fight Terrorists (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    "Racist agenda"

    So which race is muslim again? I'll wait for you to figure out where you went wrong.