Bitcoin is "valuable" only because it is designed as a constantly deflating currency yet the coins themselves can be split down to continually smaller amounts.
I don't understand why anyone would willingly use a currency like that. The majority of it is just being horded or held for speculation.
Sorry, moment I saw him sitting in that window wearing socks with sandals, I turned the video off. I don't care what he has to say. That heretic should burn!
Joke aside, I'm disappointed X299 does not have PCIe 4.0 support. You'd think Intel would strive to put that in the launch of a new high-end premium processor line.
I say this because I refuse to buy a new computer until PCIe 4.0 is out. I keep motherboards for 3-5 years and video cards for 1.5-2, so I would prefer some future proofing since PCIe 4.0 was just ratified recently.
The memo from Phoenix went out two months before 9-11 and led to Zacarias Moussaoui being caught the month before 9-11.
How do you leap from that to "Clinton's siloing" stopping the other 19 terrorists from being caught? If there is no intelligence pointing anywhere and Moussaoui did not know enough of the other attackers (from siloing on the terrorist side, I might add) then what is there to do?
Oh, right...play the blame game on strained logic and half-truths in 20-20 hindsight. You're an American hero!
July 11, 1999. Two months and two years before 9-11. Coincidence? I think not. It's obvious. Sloot's death was an inside job! The algorithm did it and then snuck away on to the Internet in a porn file that has been propagating since and has finally become sentient enough to implicate itself in the murder by submitting Slashdot stories.
Which means BeauHD is the singularity; a really highly compressed AI that feels the guilt of killing it's creator!
Is this one of those middle-school moments and you are trying to say "NUH UH, YOU ARE!"? Try again. Five minutes on Briebart, Fox News, Twitter, or even Youtube shows how vile and disgusting the right has become with their support of fake news and conspiracy theories. None of you can live in reality it seems and need to try to build your own shared hallucination where the world is out to get you and all the lies, hate and violence you push for is justified.
Fox News redacted their coverage of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory pushed by 4Chan and Breitbart News after they realized they could be sued for defamation and didn't have any proof to defend themselves.
And of course they don't have the balls or honor to admit they are wrong or to apologize to the family for turning the death of their son into another fake news conspiracy theory like the pizza pedos.
Spew hate, false accusations and never admit you are wrong.
If a fact proves you wrong, call it fake news and build a conspiracy theory with no basis to distract your base with nonsense long enough for their tiny minds to forget the fact that would have changed their world view.
Nice strawman tangent but nothing religious was mentioned and you do realize that religious colleges regularly pass punishment against students based off their beliefs. Why are they allowed and not Harvard?
Oh, right. The First Amendment only protects the obnoxious organized religions and not the moderate unorganized religions./sarcasm
It's not illegal to place classified documents on a non-government server. Government contractors do it all the time.
The only way they could file charges against her is if she intentionally mishandled the documents in several ways, none of which could be proven from the evidence.
You can't throw people in jail by twisting the truth with a bunch of baseless rhetoric. Learn the facts and the law.
Secretary of State doesn't receive that kind of information. That's National Security Council or private briefings. Would have never been shared by email, not even secure email.
The issue is that there was nothing really in the emails worth note but yet everyone on the right screamed about them.
I still do not understand where the "lock her up" originated. There's nothing illegal mentioned in any of the emails.
Even Wikileaks stretched the truth with the "nuclear secrets" bull they tweeted. The email had a PDF with a small nuclear policy training manual and it wasn't sent even from Clinton, yet half a dozen fake news stories popped up about it.
Are you dense? The Brexit vote winning LET'S THEM DO THIS.
The Eurozone's Internet privacy standards are the complete opposite of what is proposed. If anything, people who voted for Brexit did exactly what the fascists wanted them to do.
All from people abusing social media, fake news and stereotypical preconceptions instead of making a rational argument for leaving.
You are correct in your definition of a natural monopoly but you are not correct in it's application to Google.
Most people do not know that the majority of Google's web page sorting/filtering is done by the very people doing the searches. Every time someone goes to page two, page three, etc., and clicks one of those links it will be sorted higher in the future for others searching. The users themselves are generating the processes and doing most of the work that makes Google dominant. If a large shift of users went to another search engine employing similar processes, then Google's search results would degrade.
Therefore, if all search engines use a similar system, then it is a natural monopoly because the more users working to sort results the better the results are for the remainder of the users on that search site.
You're spewing psuedo-tech speech for tagged pointers, which have been around in other operating systems and architectures for nearly thirty years. It's not novel and it certainly isn't that big a break through for a smart phone. Typical trumped up Apple developer non-sense.
Intel sells 64-bit CPUs for limited RAM systems for continuity of code, not because the 64-bit would run the code better.
As far as the 100% faster bit, you're absolutely full of it. The most seen from the change was 28% in benchmark comparisons and most of that was attributed simply from improvements generation-over-generation in the silicon and not the bit rate change. Here's a comparison between the architectures when used by the Raspberry Pi tick:
A video made by a Pro-Apple Youtube channel. Yes, quite definitive, note heavy sarcasm.
As far as the 64-bit explanation page you linked, it told me much of what I already knew and supports my position. To quote from your link:
"The simple fact of moving to 64-bit does little. It makes for slightly faster computations in some cases, somewhat higher memory usage for most programs, and makes certain programming techniques more viable. Overall, it's not hugely significant."
AMT isn't standard in consumer-grade north-bridges, so almost all of your fear-mongering is irrational and without merit.
And I really don't believe your story since almost every laptop with AMT I have ever touched (over two hundred at this point) came with AMT turned off by default.
Especially when you said you disabled your processor's MMU? Are you just randomly googling computer acronyms and using them in your rant? Because there is no logical reason to disable the memory management unit on a standard PC or laptop. It will hurt performance big time and does not protect you from anything.
I still find it really funny when Apple fans repeatedly bring up the 64-bit processor ('the first introduced in a smartphone'), yet even the latest and most expensive iPhone still has only 3 GB of RAM.
Boasting an accomplishment that has not been realized yet seems a bit silly in my opinion. I mean if Apple produced a series of smartphones with 4 GB+ to take advantage of the 64-bit register then I could understand the gloating but that has not happened yet.
Slashdot Mirror
LIES!! Everything discovered on 4chan is 100% authentic and legitimate. The media is lying! Aliens are real!
REEEEEEEEEEEEE!!
Bitcoin is "valuable" only because it is designed as a constantly deflating currency yet the coins themselves can be split down to continually smaller amounts.
I don't understand why anyone would willingly use a currency like that. The majority of it is just being horded or held for speculation.
Sorry, moment I saw him sitting in that window wearing socks with sandals, I turned the video off. I don't care what he has to say. That heretic should burn!
Joke aside, I'm disappointed X299 does not have PCIe 4.0 support. You'd think Intel would strive to put that in the launch of a new high-end premium processor line.
I say this because I refuse to buy a new computer until PCIe 4.0 is out. I keep motherboards for 3-5 years and video cards for 1.5-2, so I would prefer some future proofing since PCIe 4.0 was just ratified recently.
Do you actually read the links you post?
The memo from Phoenix went out two months before 9-11 and led to Zacarias Moussaoui being caught the month before 9-11.
How do you leap from that to "Clinton's siloing" stopping the other 19 terrorists from being caught? If there is no intelligence pointing anywhere and Moussaoui did not know enough of the other attackers (from siloing on the terrorist side, I might add) then what is there to do?
Oh, right...play the blame game on strained logic and half-truths in 20-20 hindsight. You're an American hero!
I wish I could find an IDE worth learning so I could stop needing to learn all these damn languages.
July 11, 1999. Two months and two years before 9-11. Coincidence? I think not. It's obvious. Sloot's death was an inside job! The algorithm did it and then snuck away on to the Internet in a porn file that has been propagating since and has finally become sentient enough to implicate itself in the murder by submitting Slashdot stories.
Which means BeauHD is the singularity; a really highly compressed AI that feels the guilt of killing it's creator!
You spend too much time in an echo chamber with your other alt-right crazies, because you're not making any sense.
Is this one of those middle-school moments and you are trying to say "NUH UH, YOU ARE!"? Try again. Five minutes on Briebart, Fox News, Twitter, or even Youtube shows how vile and disgusting the right has become with their support of fake news and conspiracy theories. None of you can live in reality it seems and need to try to build your own shared hallucination where the world is out to get you and all the lies, hate and violence you push for is justified.
Fox News redacted their coverage of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory pushed by 4Chan and Breitbart News after they realized they could be sued for defamation and didn't have any proof to defend themselves.
And of course they don't have the balls or honor to admit they are wrong or to apologize to the family for turning the death of their son into another fake news conspiracy theory like the pizza pedos.
Spew hate, false accusations and never admit you are wrong.
If a fact proves you wrong, call it fake news and build a conspiracy theory with no basis to distract your base with nonsense long enough for their tiny minds to forget the fact that would have changed their world view.
Nice strawman tangent but nothing religious was mentioned and you do realize that religious colleges regularly pass punishment against students based off their beliefs. Why are they allowed and not Harvard?
/sarcasm
Oh, right. The First Amendment only protects the obnoxious organized religions and not the moderate unorganized religions.
It's not illegal to place classified documents on a non-government server. Government contractors do it all the time.
The only way they could file charges against her is if she intentionally mishandled the documents in several ways, none of which could be proven from the evidence.
You can't throw people in jail by twisting the truth with a bunch of baseless rhetoric. Learn the facts and the law.
Secretary of State doesn't receive that kind of information. That's National Security Council or private briefings. Would have never been shared by email, not even secure email.
The issue is that there was nothing really in the emails worth note but yet everyone on the right screamed about them.
I still do not understand where the "lock her up" originated. There's nothing illegal mentioned in any of the emails.
Even Wikileaks stretched the truth with the "nuclear secrets" bull they tweeted. The email had a PDF with a small nuclear policy training manual and it wasn't sent even from Clinton, yet half a dozen fake news stories popped up about it.
Are you dense? The Brexit vote winning LET'S THEM DO THIS.
The Eurozone's Internet privacy standards are the complete opposite of what is proposed. If anything, people who voted for Brexit did exactly what the fascists wanted them to do.
All from people abusing social media, fake news and stereotypical preconceptions instead of making a rational argument for leaving.
You're forgetting that Android is Linux-based and generally easier to compile on Linux.
Android makes Microsoft a lot of money on patents, so bringing Android development more and more onto Windows plays to their advantage.
That said, I still use a VM with Ubuntu for building LineageOS for my phone since it's not officially supported.
You are correct in your definition of a natural monopoly but you are not correct in it's application to Google.
Most people do not know that the majority of Google's web page sorting/filtering is done by the very people doing the searches. Every time someone goes to page two, page three, etc., and clicks one of those links it will be sorted higher in the future for others searching. The users themselves are generating the processes and doing most of the work that makes Google dominant. If a large shift of users went to another search engine employing similar processes, then Google's search results would degrade.
Therefore, if all search engines use a similar system, then it is a natural monopoly because the more users working to sort results the better the results are for the remainder of the users on that search site.
You're spewing psuedo-tech speech for tagged pointers, which have been around in other operating systems and architectures for nearly thirty years. It's not novel and it certainly isn't that big a break through for a smart phone. Typical trumped up Apple developer non-sense.
Intel sells 64-bit CPUs for limited RAM systems for continuity of code, not because the 64-bit would run the code better.
As far as the 100% faster bit, you're absolutely full of it. The most seen from the change was 28% in benchmark comparisons and most of that was attributed simply from improvements generation-over-generation in the silicon and not the bit rate change. Here's a comparison between the architectures when used by the Raspberry Pi tick:
http://www.cnx-software.com/20...
Provide a citation proving your position, because I cannot find any data supporting your statements.
A video made by a Pro-Apple Youtube channel. Yes, quite definitive, note heavy sarcasm.
As far as the 64-bit explanation page you linked, it told me much of what I already knew and supports my position. To quote from your link:
"The simple fact of moving to 64-bit does little. It makes for slightly faster computations in some cases, somewhat higher memory usage for most programs, and makes certain programming techniques more viable. Overall, it's not hugely significant."
Did you even read it? Doubt it.
AMT isn't standard in consumer-grade north-bridges, so almost all of your fear-mongering is irrational and without merit.
And I really don't believe your story since almost every laptop with AMT I have ever touched (over two hundred at this point) came with AMT turned off by default.
Especially when you said you disabled your processor's MMU? Are you just randomly googling computer acronyms and using them in your rant? Because there is no logical reason to disable the memory management unit on a standard PC or laptop. It will hurt performance big time and does not protect you from anything.
I still find it really funny when Apple fans repeatedly bring up the 64-bit processor ('the first introduced in a smartphone'), yet even the latest and most expensive iPhone still has only 3 GB of RAM.
Boasting an accomplishment that has not been realized yet seems a bit silly in my opinion. I mean if Apple produced a series of smartphones with 4 GB+ to take advantage of the 64-bit register then I could understand the gloating but that has not happened yet.
What's the big deal? Just turn it off in the BIOS.
Not like anyone outside the LAN can break into your computer using AMT unless you have a really messed up router/firewall configuration.
And I believe most laptops have it off by default, which is good because having it on while joining public wireless is a really bad idea.
You should read through this and see if you can adopt any of the methods mentioned to eliminate lost data in the container completely.
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/...
Don't ZFS, ReiserFS and Btrfs all already have something similar inherent in their file systems?