I don't know if people think "real AI" (insert your definition here) really exists, but there's certainly some "the computer makes the decision, humans just get to see the results" in play, and in some cases the humans don't know enough about the current state of the innards of the black box to be able to predict the decision. I'm not worried about robot revolution, but I am somewhat concerned that folks will get turned down for loans, insurance, what have you for reasons that no human can explain, validate, and/or correct.
wanting to know which of my cats is walking on the countertop makes me a busybody? wanting to know when the UPS guy drops off a package on my front porch makes me a busybody?... I'm still not seeing it.
the part you appear to be dismissing is that it indicates that we have in fact identified the big differences. There's not another big difference hiding in the weeds, so to speak. This is useful information.
For most of my purposes DVD image/audio quality is fine, but I really like having the menus available for things like language/subtitle selection. Thanks for the pointers!
that's about the solution I came up with when I wanted all the menus and stuff for DVDs, but that was a number of years ago. Is there a good solution for playing an ISO image nowadays, especially across a network?
I figured it was because the tilt in the road surface to get water to flow to the gutter was worse at the edge. But yeah, bikes hugging the left edge of the bike lane always made me nervous when I was going past them.
it sounds like they're not taking bitcoin themselves, they're just willing to connect to a bitcoin-dollar exchange to make your transactions simpler. They only wind up getting dollars.
Interesting question. What comes to my mind would be something like an automated hot air balloon; heat the air using solar-generated electricity to increase buoyancy, let it cool to decrease; possibly add/remove air from the bag using an electric pump. Not the fastest response time, but might be adequate for some purposes.
I'd be interested in seeing what methods they actually use, though:)
To me, "just happens" carries the connotation of "for no reason", and _that_ has never been true. There's a reason. Usually programmer error, sometimes hardware error, rarely random glitch. But there's always a reason and the vast majority of the time it's human error.
You're quite correct that crashes are to be expected, especially in a learning environment. And that's how I read the article author's statement too. But I can see where mykepredko could read it otherwise and disagree with that reading.
Yeah, if they can get any form of credit an escrow account should be very manageable if they actually have something functional and just need to ramp up production. If they don't have something functional, they probably won't qualify for this program.
Glass is 31% slower, not a rounding error. Speed of light through air is much closer to matching your description. While this article from 2013 talks about using air-based conduits, I don't think it's reached full deployment yet.
that seems more feasible. I still think it would be simpler for them to just require the proof before issuing the approval, but inefficient processes are hardly a new thing. Thanks for the clarification:)
why do you think it mitigates the issue? My reading is that one of the biggest heat sinks we have is filling faster than we thought, reducing future ability to absorb heat.
I don't know if people think "real AI" (insert your definition here) really exists, but there's certainly some "the computer makes the decision, humans just get to see the results" in play, and in some cases the humans don't know enough about the current state of the innards of the black box to be able to predict the decision. I'm not worried about robot revolution, but I am somewhat concerned that folks will get turned down for loans, insurance, what have you for reasons that no human can explain, validate, and/or correct.
wanting to know which of my cats is walking on the countertop makes me a busybody? ... I'm still not seeing it.
wanting to know when the UPS guy drops off a package on my front porch makes me a busybody?
the part you appear to be dismissing is that it indicates that we have in fact identified the big differences. There's not another big difference hiding in the weeds, so to speak. This is useful information.
For most of my purposes DVD image/audio quality is fine, but I really like having the menus available for things like language/subtitle selection. Thanks for the pointers!
Combine them and up the drive speed and you could have WARHAMR 40K drives. (in red, obviously.)
that's about the solution I came up with when I wanted all the menus and stuff for DVDs, but that was a number of years ago. Is there a good solution for playing an ISO image nowadays, especially across a network?
I figured it was because the tilt in the road surface to get water to flow to the gutter was worse at the edge. But yeah, bikes hugging the left edge of the bike lane always made me nervous when I was going past them.
you can't do that if you know you're wrong. Proving that they knew they were wrong when they said it... that's the challenging bit.
Do you have a pointer to the data you're using on what percentage of millennial degrees are in which fields?
if it pays for itself, what's the opportunity cost?
No, they'll tell you whatever they think you want to hear.
so can specified overrides
it sounds like they're not taking bitcoin themselves, they're just willing to connect to a bitcoin-dollar exchange to make your transactions simpler. They only wind up getting dollars.
I know that and you know that but the people who make, e.g. bathroom scales are perfectly happy to report the force of weight in kilograms.
This. In theory the non-metric unit of mass is supposed to be the "slug" but pound gets overloaded just like kilogram does, to be both mass and force.
Interesting question. What comes to my mind would be something like an automated hot air balloon; heat the air using solar-generated electricity to increase buoyancy, let it cool to decrease; possibly add/remove air from the bag using an electric pump. Not the fastest response time, but might be adequate for some purposes.
I'd be interested in seeing what methods they actually use, though :)
I wonder if this would be easier/cheaper than the 7k satellites SpaceX just got approval for?
To me, "just happens" carries the connotation of "for no reason", and _that_ has never been true. There's a reason. Usually programmer error, sometimes hardware error, rarely random glitch. But there's always a reason and the vast majority of the time it's human error.
You're quite correct that crashes are to be expected, especially in a learning environment. And that's how I read the article author's statement too. But I can see where mykepredko could read it otherwise and disagree with that reading.
Yeah, if they can get any form of credit an escrow account should be very manageable if they actually have something functional and just need to ramp up production. If they don't have something functional, they probably won't qualify for this program.
what we should do is modify humans to be poisonous to mosquitos :)
write a letter to your congresscritters pushing for mandatory mechanical licensing of video. Don't hold your breath, though.
Glass is 31% slower, not a rounding error. Speed of light through air is much closer to matching your description. While this article from 2013 talks about using air-based conduits, I don't think it's reached full deployment yet.
that seems more feasible. I still think it would be simpler for them to just require the proof before issuing the approval, but inefficient processes are hardly a new thing. Thanks for the clarification :)
how does responding to a plural statement with a plural response indicate cowardice?
why do you think it mitigates the issue? My reading is that one of the biggest heat sinks we have is filling faster than we thought, reducing future ability to absorb heat.