actually, it's still not shutting down properly. It just gets forcibly killed when you log out, so the final result is the same and it's all good, right? No longer a significant problem so pulseaudio doesn't have to get fixed?
If I'm reading it right, https://www.hydrogen.energy.go... indicates (about page 18) that a system to hold 5.6kg of hydrogen would be about 3k each with mass production. According to http://hypertextbook.com/facts... the energy density of hydrogen is 33.3 kWh/kg, so that 3k tank would hold about 186 kWh worth, but I don't think that takes fuel cell efficiency into account. According to https://www.hydrogen.energy.go... a PEM cell (the only one listed as "portable" is 50-60% efficient, so it would be more like 112 kWh, which (okay, at this point the "if"s are really stretching) ought to push a Tesla Model S 300ish miles. Not bad.
But yeah, as you note, transportation and transfer is extra. I don't know enough to give figures for that, between having to have a large pressurized tank, a bunch of pumps with (probably) individual compressors, and periodic replacement of parts from embrittlement...
except the perjury part doesn't apply to "this infringes our copyright", it only applies to "I am or represent someone who has a copyright". The law was carefully crafted to penalize impersonation of a corporation but not false accusation.
I agree with your points, but I think I'm missing a step in your math. Wouldn't framing be more $/m^2, instead of more $/watt?
Certainly, better efficiency (more w/m^2) results in less area given a constant load and therefore less framing and less money for framing, but I don't see how you get "area squared" savings...
unfortunately, the reverse engineering clause is about programs, not data. Ripping for use on a different platform is more on the fair use side, except that in the DeCSS case the judge decided that if Congress had meant fair use to apply to that they'd have said so. Legislation has been proposed to address that; I'm sure the RIAA has opposed it vehemently, and that their opposition is why such legislation hasn't passed. *sigh*
This is awesome. 15 minutes, a set of headphones, a 3.5mm cable, wire cutters, and a soldering iron (heck, electrical tape) and you've got an HDCP-digital -> analog converter. Audio only, but still.
What form of government intervention (required for a perfect capitalist system) is not vulnerable to regulatory capture? Or is it just that a sufficiently low level of intervention isn't worth capturing?
I've wondered, how does the constantness of the speed of light work with the known differences between speed of light in different media (vacuum, water, air)? The only concession to that I've seen has been use of "the speed of light in a vacuum" as the _true_ c but then we get into "well, if atoms being in the vacuum can make a difference, what about other types of mass/energy" and I've never seen that addressed. Can you point me to anything on this?
I've thought of that too, but I have to figure if it was that simple it would have come out already. Surely someone at NASA thought to check for microwave emissions in the test rig and see if that would account for the observed behavior.
It seems to me that you are either overgeneralizing or know more than I do, in which case I'd love to learn how it is that gravity is actually a repulsion from something else. Likewise magnetism and electric charge (assuming proper polarities).
This may sound sarcastic but it's not meant to be; I'm not a physicist and it wouldn't surprise me too terribly much to find that there's reasons to think of it differently than I've heard... but I haven't heard of them yet.
As far as I'm aware, the assertion that all of those are unique are based entirely on a lack of contradictory evidence. How much effort has been expended to try to find contradictory evidence I don't know, though I'd expect that someone would have run a "check for apparent dupes" process on existing fingerprint databases by now.
Slashdot Mirror
actually, it's still not shutting down properly. It just gets forcibly killed when you log out, so the final result is the same and it's all good, right? No longer a significant problem so pulseaudio doesn't have to get fixed?
If I'm reading it right, https://www.hydrogen.energy.go... indicates (about page 18) that a system to hold 5.6kg of hydrogen would be about 3k each with mass production. According to http://hypertextbook.com/facts... the energy density of hydrogen is 33.3 kWh/kg, so that 3k tank would hold about 186 kWh worth, but I don't think that takes fuel cell efficiency into account. According to https://www.hydrogen.energy.go... a PEM cell (the only one listed as "portable" is 50-60% efficient, so it would be more like 112 kWh, which (okay, at this point the "if"s are really stretching) ought to push a Tesla Model S 300ish miles. Not bad.
But yeah, as you note, transportation and transfer is extra. I don't know enough to give figures for that, between having to have a large pressurized tank, a bunch of pumps with (probably) individual compressors, and periodic replacement of parts from embrittlement...
so it should be rephrased as "we live on a planet where hydrogen has plenty of things to react with" and maybe append "sometimes spectacularly".
except the perjury part doesn't apply to "this infringes our copyright", it only applies to "I am or represent someone who has a copyright". The law was carefully crafted to penalize impersonation of a corporation but not false accusation.
I agree with your points, but I think I'm missing a step in your math. Wouldn't framing be more $/m^2, instead of more $/watt?
Certainly, better efficiency (more w/m^2) results in less area given a constant load and therefore less framing and less money for framing, but I don't see how you get "area squared" savings...
how many CEOs does the franchise owner have to be replaced?
Or are you still on the actual original subject, instead of the one you're replying to?
unfortunately, the reverse engineering clause is about programs, not data. Ripping for use on a different platform is more on the fair use side, except that in the DeCSS case the judge decided that if Congress had meant fair use to apply to that they'd have said so. Legislation has been proposed to address that; I'm sure the RIAA has opposed it vehemently, and that their opposition is why such legislation hasn't passed. *sigh*
yeah, the part that got me was the assumption that these bureaucratic departments are going to let themselves shrink.
but there is a right of expression, usually termed "speech" but interpreted to be more than vocalization. So... speech or privacy?
Very cool, thanks!
Awesome! Do you have a pointer? I'm curious how they keep up to date on county and city stuff everywhere.
if only we had a table of tax rates that was updated on a regular basis and covered every sales-tax-handling regional entity.
see also "statutory damages" in US law. (I know it's a german case, but if we're into car analogies, it's close enough to be worth mentioning.)
This is awesome. 15 minutes, a set of headphones, a 3.5mm cable, wire cutters, and a soldering iron (heck, electrical tape) and you've got an HDCP-digital -> analog converter. Audio only, but still.
If they have enough evidence to seize the computer they have enough evidence to get a warrant to subvert the computer.
What form of government intervention (required for a perfect capitalist system) is not vulnerable to regulatory capture? Or is it just that a sufficiently low level of intervention isn't worth capturing?
This right here. I would bet money that Elon Musk has already got someone looking into this.
Huh. I'd have thought that absorption and re-emission would tend to randomize the direction of travel. Very interesting. Thanks!
I've wondered, how does the constantness of the speed of light work with the known differences between speed of light in different media (vacuum, water, air)? The only concession to that I've seen has been use of "the speed of light in a vacuum" as the _true_ c but then we get into "well, if atoms being in the vacuum can make a difference, what about other types of mass/energy" and I've never seen that addressed. Can you point me to anything on this?
I've thought of that too, but I have to figure if it was that simple it would have come out already. Surely someone at NASA thought to check for microwave emissions in the test rig and see if that would account for the observed behavior.
It seems to me that you are either overgeneralizing or know more than I do, in which case I'd love to learn how it is that gravity is actually a repulsion from something else. Likewise magnetism and electric charge (assuming proper polarities).
This may sound sarcastic but it's not meant to be; I'm not a physicist and it wouldn't surprise me too terribly much to find that there's reasons to think of it differently than I've heard... but I haven't heard of them yet.
As far as I'm aware, the assertion that all of those are unique are based entirely on a lack of contradictory evidence. How much effort has been expended to try to find contradictory evidence I don't know, though I'd expect that someone would have run a "check for apparent dupes" process on existing fingerprint databases by now.
because then when you go to a different device it knows where you left off.
you misspelled "millennia".
depends on the atom. If they're using a small one it's usually more work than it's worth.