The DMCA is irrelevant in this case. The state law doesn't say you have the right to circumvent diagnostic code encryption, it says that auto manufacturers have to make their diagnostic codes public. The car companies could legally encrypt the codes, they just wouldn't be able to sell their cars in Massachusetts.
How do you square your idea of an aloof, unknowable god with the personal god of the bible who gives individual people instructions and intervenes in their lives on a regular basis?
As a pilot, I'm subjected to nearly the same security requirements as passengers. I find this to be a waste of time.
The point of screening pilots isn't to catch pilots, it's to catch people dressed as pilots. I'm a staunch opponent of the TSA, but screening pilots is one of the few correct things they're doing.
He wants to return to the gold standard, deregulate the economy, gut social programs, and eliminate the IRS. All of those benefit the capitalist class almost exclusively.
Ron Paul has good social policies, but terrible economic policy for most of us.
We'll never know who started the fight. The only witness is the shooter. What we do know is that Zimmerman was pursuing this kid against the recommendation of the 911 operator. The best thing you can say about him is that he showed terrible judgement.
I have never heard that term use to refer to Obama
Then you haven't been listening. Second result on Google. First is ubrandictionary defining it as "A play on Barack Hussein Obama II's last name, citing his roots as a typical Apefrican, bongo beating, bush monkey."
That strikes me as a "macaca" charge: and attempt to create racial animosity where none exists by inventing new terms or new meanings for them
Considering that the phrase "welcome to America" came right after the word macaca (aimed at a natural born citizen, by the way), I don't think that the word's usage was anywhere as innocent as you're trying to paint it.
If you're trying to link this incident to other attempts to introduce racial animosity, you could pick better examples.
I'm not sure what people have against someone who, remember, has already been convicted of a crime, to have to endure special screening before incarceration.
Arrest != conviction. The man in question was wrongfully arrested (for a fine that he had already paid). On the radio this morning they were also talking about strip searches for offenses such as riding a bike without an audible bell and walking a dog without a leash.
The worst thing about this ruling is that it provides police with yet another way to silence people who are inconvenient. Protesters, people who record video of police brutality, and anyone else are now at risk of punitive strip searches. The only sliver of hope in this ruling is that it doesn't overturn existing laws that prohibit strip searches in minor cases. We'll just have to see if legislators try to dismantle those in the next wave of "tough on crime" election year bullshit.
Doing a Google reverse image search turns up a few articles on different sites, all around the same time, so I guess it must just be from 2009/10. Not sure where I'd go looking for articles about the campaign from ~1999, but I hope what I found helps your search a little.
I take it you're assuming that based on Android not being specifically mentioned in the second link? Because according the the manufacturer, Android is definitely supported.
I assumed that too, but it doesn't seem true in this case:
Technicians apparently mis-entered the pattern enough times to lock the phone, which could only be unlocked using the phone owner's Google account credentials.
Why they were even bothering with the unlock screen rather than just slurping up all the data on the phone with a UFED is beyond me.
Volume doesn't translate to quality. Between regulatory capture, dismantling Glass-Steagall, and companies "shopping" for the regulatory office least capable of keeping an eye on them, the financial industry has been dangerously unregulated for years. When your entire industry is failing and essentially bringing down the global economy, you are not "tightly regulated".
How much cash do you have on hand at any given time, though? We already have a largely electronic system; we just switch to hard currency to do transactions.
You might think so, until you read how the WTO has ruled on these things in the past. A quote:
In other words, the United States bans imports of shrimp or shrimp products from any country not meeting certain policy conditions. We finally note that previous panels have considered similar measures restricting imports to be ‘prohibitions or restrictions’ within the meaning of Article XI.(599)”(600)
Basically, regulating based on policy conditions (nets that don't kill sea turtles in the example above, workers' wages in the case we're talking about) is considered a prohibition or restriction. Under WTO rules, you can't place a prohibition or restriction on trade from another WTO nation. Ain't free trade grand?
Slashdot Mirror
The DMCA is irrelevant in this case. The state law doesn't say you have the right to circumvent diagnostic code encryption, it says that auto manufacturers have to make their diagnostic codes public. The car companies could legally encrypt the codes, they just wouldn't be able to sell their cars in Massachusetts.
How do you square your idea of an aloof, unknowable god with the personal god of the bible who gives individual people instructions and intervenes in their lives on a regular basis?
As a pilot, I'm subjected to nearly the same security requirements as passengers. I find this to be a waste of time.
The point of screening pilots isn't to catch pilots, it's to catch people dressed as pilots. I'm a staunch opponent of the TSA, but screening pilots is one of the few correct things they're doing.
I say the deserve another billion/yr because, afterall, look at all the terrorism they've stopped just this week! [tsa.gov]
Thank god the TSA is keeping us safe from the dangers of canned soup.
He wants to return to the gold standard, deregulate the economy, gut social programs, and eliminate the IRS. All of those benefit the capitalist class almost exclusively.
Ron Paul has good social policies, but terrible economic policy for most of us.
rally != lynchmob
But Zimmerman's version is that he lost Martin, which legally ends that confrontation.
And how convenient, given that he's the only witness.
We'll never know who started the fight. The only witness is the shooter. What we do know is that Zimmerman was pursuing this kid against the recommendation of the 911 operator. The best thing you can say about him is that he showed terrible judgement.
17 is still a child, bud.
I have never heard that term use to refer to Obama
Then you haven't been listening. Second result on Google. First is ubrandictionary defining it as "A play on Barack Hussein Obama II's last name, citing his roots as a typical Apefrican, bongo beating, bush monkey."
That strikes me as a "macaca" charge: and attempt to create racial animosity where none exists by inventing new terms or new meanings for them
Considering that the phrase "welcome to America" came right after the word macaca (aimed at a natural born citizen, by the way), I don't think that the word's usage was anywhere as innocent as you're trying to paint it.
If you're trying to link this incident to other attempts to introduce racial animosity, you could pick better examples.
All that needs to be said about the supposed "news/commentary" divide on Fox.
One big smokestack is easier to regulate (and replace with something cleaner eventually)
The process is already underway. Coal plant construction is ceasing in favor of cleaner natural gas for both economic and regulatory reasons.
Bill Maher's like the left-wing Rush Limbaugh from what I understand.
Except people actually listen to Rush Limbaugh.
I'm not sure what people have against someone who, remember, has already been convicted of a crime, to have to endure special screening before incarceration.
Arrest != conviction. The man in question was wrongfully arrested (for a fine that he had already paid). On the radio this morning they were also talking about strip searches for offenses such as riding a bike without an audible bell and walking a dog without a leash.
The worst thing about this ruling is that it provides police with yet another way to silence people who are inconvenient. Protesters, people who record video of police brutality, and anyone else are now at risk of punitive strip searches. The only sliver of hope in this ruling is that it doesn't overturn existing laws that prohibit strip searches in minor cases. We'll just have to see if legislators try to dismantle those in the next wave of "tough on crime" election year bullshit.
I saw it in two different articles: 1 2
Doing a Google reverse image search turns up a few articles on different sites, all around the same time, so I guess it must just be from 2009/10. Not sure where I'd go looking for articles about the campaign from ~1999, but I hope what I found helps your search a little.
Are you sure it wasn't a nail?
I take it you're assuming that based on Android not being specifically mentioned in the second link? Because according the the manufacturer, Android is definitely supported.
Technicians apparently mis-entered the pattern enough times to lock the phone, which could only be unlocked using the phone owner's Google account credentials.
Why they were even bothering with the unlock screen rather than just slurping up all the data on the phone with a UFED is beyond me.
Volume doesn't translate to quality. Between regulatory capture, dismantling Glass-Steagall, and companies "shopping" for the regulatory office least capable of keeping an eye on them, the financial industry has been dangerously unregulated for years. When your entire industry is failing and essentially bringing down the global economy, you are not "tightly regulated".
tightly regulated
Thanks for that, I needed a good laugh.
I bet Sony wishes all these hackers would just beat it.
I'm still mourning the loss of Cheggit.
How much cash do you have on hand at any given time, though? We already have a largely electronic system; we just switch to hard currency to do transactions.
The TSA has taken plenty of people's dignity. Unfortunately, that's not the sort of thing you can give back.
In other words, the United States bans imports of shrimp or shrimp products from any country not meeting certain policy conditions. We finally note that previous panels have considered similar measures restricting imports to be ‘prohibitions or restrictions’ within the meaning of Article XI.(599)”(600)
Basically, regulating based on policy conditions (nets that don't kill sea turtles in the example above, workers' wages in the case we're talking about) is considered a prohibition or restriction. Under WTO rules, you can't place a prohibition or restriction on trade from another WTO nation. Ain't free trade grand?