Otherwise, evil people in power could just make sure to outlaw, arrest and convict their opponents for whatever felony they could invent.
Lame. Arresting and convicting someone is the biggest waste of time and money just to deprive him of his voting rights. Pay tens of thousands of dollars just to take one vote away. Much easier and cheaper to just stuff the ballot box.
It should be pointed out that hawkish behaviour under the Bush regime meant a LOT of people didn't survive the Bush regime (literally bombed and shot to death). While American's have been concerned with talk of Mexican Walls and grabbing women inappropriately, the rest of the world has been gravely worried about the potential dismantling of major world alliances and free trade deals, and the potential for nuclear proliferation.
People in the US need to realise that US guns in US hands kill a LOT of people around the world.
I'm confused. Do you want continued Team America and trade deals (Clinton) or do you want military and economic isolationism (Trump)? You cannot pick your favorite of each.
Think about it... Wall Street is freaking out over Trump's impending presidency. They knew *exactly* what to expect with Hillary, which was "business as usual". No one has a fucking clue what Trump is going to do.
Actually, they aren't: http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/09/investing/dow-jones-trump-wins-election/
Easier does not mean worse. It is the same low level of verification as a $10 domain validated cert, but now there's less chance Joe Blogger's readers will be FireSheeped at Starbucks because it costs him nothing and auto renews itself. It is a GOOD thing that it is easy and automatic. Lowering the barrier of entry to apply a basic level of encryption raises the barrier of entry to intercept and modify traffic.
If your primary challenge is to train users to differentiate between Extended Validation and Domain Validation, then they are already in a better place than if the challenge was to simply train them to look for the green symbol.
I'm not sure what it is you believe is happening or will happen that is worse than the alternative.
Right. Because a FREE, NON-VALIDATED certificate is 100% trustworthy. They are on par with a self-signed certificate.
The validation is essentially the same as budget CAs. The difference is LetsEncrypt convinced the major browsers to trust them even though they're a non-profit, automated service.
What's wrong, are they using their influence to keep Euroogle, the French-German-UK joint government-private joint venture from succeeding in the market?
So yes, fueling the rocket with people aboard is dangerous but boarding an already fueled rocket would be even more dangerous.
I don't think that's true, but the difference may not be as great as people suppose. What's really driving the SpaceX methodology is not, I believe, the performance gains of using the densified LOX. I think it's the long term vision of sending people to Mars.
It doesn't matter whether you are in your rocket when it blows up on Mars. You die either way. It's either an acceptably unlikely scenario or the rocket needed more work.
they removed one of the biggest selling features for me: MagSafe. That one connector has saved my notebook's ass many times
I think it's a great design that should be replicated on all laptops... but I've never once had anything bad happen to one of my Windows laptops because someone tripped over the cord. When people say this, and talk about all the times the MagSafe saved something, I wonder what kinds of environments they're using their laptops in.
I'd still rather have a really excellent laptop and an iPad pro instead of this desktop (or an iMac for that matter), then you have two screens with you wherever you go if you like, or just a tablet or just a laptop.
With "Studio" in the name, I think it's clear where this was intended to be used.
And I would bet that real graphics professionals will still want to use a dedicated graphics tablet, rather than get a bunch of hand-prints all over their screen to use a half-baked built-in digitizer.
You're still missing the point. The singular killer feature is the pressure sensitive pen. It's a Wacom Cintiq with a better screen and computer thrown in for good measure. There is nothing from Apple to directly compete with this unless you tether a $2000+ Cintiq to your Mac (https://www.amazon.com/Wacom-Cintiq-27QHD-DTK2700-DTK-2700/dp/B00R7QJBCS).
Maybe it's not a very large niche, but this is quite affordable for what it offers. The Dial accessory seems kind of cool too: https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...
It has a gigantic, ultra high resolution display that accepts a pressure sensitive pen. What are you really going to run in Linux that doesn't waste those features?
I'm no expert, I was just trying to comment on the openness of NASA vs ESA. Operationally, I'm sure there is very much to commend about you and your team.
Turns out she apparently used to be decent at maths but dropped it after being told repeatedly in school words t othe effects of "maths isn't for girls".
Don't most people studying STEM fields need to be able to obsess over their interests despite social pressures to the contrary? You didn't mention if she actually enjoyed math.
Thankfully NASA took the pictures, so the ESA can't sit on them for a few days/weeks before suggesting the all-but-inevitable (the lander crashed). The ESA really needs to learn to be more open with their operations.
Slashdot Mirror
Two of the last five Elections went to the person who didn't not win the most votes. It's no longer a academic what if.
And it sure as hell isn't not okay with me!
Otherwise, evil people in power could just make sure to outlaw, arrest and convict their opponents for whatever felony they could invent.
Lame. Arresting and convicting someone is the biggest waste of time and money just to deprive him of his voting rights. Pay tens of thousands of dollars just to take one vote away. Much easier and cheaper to just stuff the ballot box.
Are you quoting someone incapable of forming complete sentences?
It should be pointed out that hawkish behaviour under the Bush regime meant a LOT of people didn't survive the Bush regime (literally bombed and shot to death). While American's have been concerned with talk of Mexican Walls and grabbing women inappropriately, the rest of the world has been gravely worried about the potential dismantling of major world alliances and free trade deals, and the potential for nuclear proliferation.
People in the US need to realise that US guns in US hands kill a LOT of people around the world.
I'm confused. Do you want continued Team America and trade deals (Clinton) or do you want military and economic isolationism (Trump)? You cannot pick your favorite of each.
Voting for Trump out of protest is like shooting your self in the foot to cure foot fungus.
You're underestimating Hillary Clinton.
and every single Trump voter I know was a Bernie supporter.
That says more about the echo chamber you choose to live in than it says anything about Sanders, Clinton, or Trump.
Think about it... Wall Street is freaking out over Trump's impending presidency. They knew *exactly* what to expect with Hillary, which was "business as usual". No one has a fucking clue what Trump is going to do.
Actually, they aren't:
http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/09/investing/dow-jones-trump-wins-election/
Voter fraud is extremely rare
But what if it isn't?
Don't get me wrong, I'm of this general opinion. But if we're wrong, how would we know?
because come Wednesday morning, we'll have a woman in the white house.
I'm not a constitutional scholar, but I believe we won't have a woman in the White House (serving as President) until January 20, 2017.
I'm not a statistician or economist, but I believe there just may be a woman in the White House right now.
Easier does not mean worse. It is the same low level of verification as a $10 domain validated cert, but now there's less chance Joe Blogger's readers will be FireSheeped at Starbucks because it costs him nothing and auto renews itself. It is a GOOD thing that it is easy and automatic. Lowering the barrier of entry to apply a basic level of encryption raises the barrier of entry to intercept and modify traffic.
If your primary challenge is to train users to differentiate between Extended Validation and Domain Validation, then they are already in a better place than if the challenge was to simply train them to look for the green symbol.
I'm not sure what it is you believe is happening or will happen that is worse than the alternative.
Right. Because a FREE, NON-VALIDATED certificate is 100% trustworthy. They are on par with a self-signed certificate.
The validation is essentially the same as budget CAs. The difference is LetsEncrypt convinced the major browsers to trust them even though they're a non-profit, automated service.
India's spending on defense is less than its spending on education. Not something you can say for the US.
You can if you acknowledge that most education expenses are covered at the local level rather than the federal.
What's wrong, are they using their influence to keep Euroogle, the French-German-UK joint government-private joint venture from succeeding in the market?
So yes, fueling the rocket with people aboard is dangerous but boarding an already fueled rocket would be even more dangerous.
I don't think that's true, but the difference may not be as great as people suppose. What's really driving the SpaceX methodology is not, I believe, the performance gains of using the densified LOX. I think it's the long term vision of sending people to Mars.
It doesn't matter whether you are in your rocket when it blows up on Mars. You die either way. It's either an acceptably unlikely scenario or the rocket needed more work.
they removed one of the biggest selling features for me: MagSafe. That one connector has saved my notebook's ass many times
I think it's a great design that should be replicated on all laptops... but I've never once had anything bad happen to one of my Windows laptops because someone tripped over the cord. When people say this, and talk about all the times the MagSafe saved something, I wonder what kinds of environments they're using their laptops in.
We spent 2 trillion dollars and 4000 lives to protect the oil industry.
I think the cost of US policy in the Middle East over the last half century is much higher.
I'd still rather have a really excellent laptop and an iPad pro instead of this desktop (or an iMac for that matter), then you have two screens with you wherever you go if you like, or just a tablet or just a laptop.
With "Studio" in the name, I think it's clear where this was intended to be used.
And I would bet that real graphics professionals will still want to use a dedicated graphics tablet, rather than get a bunch of hand-prints all over their screen to use a half-baked built-in digitizer.
You're still missing the point. The singular killer feature is the pressure sensitive pen. It's a Wacom Cintiq with a better screen and computer thrown in for good measure. There is nothing from Apple to directly compete with this unless you tether a $2000+ Cintiq to your Mac (https://www.amazon.com/Wacom-Cintiq-27QHD-DTK2700-DTK-2700/dp/B00R7QJBCS).
Maybe it's not a very large niche, but this is quite affordable for what it offers. The Dial accessory seems kind of cool too: https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...
Is the touchscreen and Windows 10 really worth $800?
If you draw for a living it's worth far more than $800.
Distrowatch putting the fun back in computing.
It has a gigantic, ultra high resolution display that accepts a pressure sensitive pen. What are you really going to run in Linux that doesn't waste those features?
I'm no expert, I was just trying to comment on the openness of NASA vs ESA. Operationally, I'm sure there is very much to commend about you and your team.
Turns out she apparently used to be decent at maths but dropped it after being told repeatedly in school words t othe effects of "maths isn't for girls".
Don't most people studying STEM fields need to be able to obsess over their interests despite social pressures to the contrary? You didn't mention if she actually enjoyed math.
Thankfully NASA took the pictures, so the ESA can't sit on them for a few days/weeks before suggesting the all-but-inevitable (the lander crashed). The ESA really needs to learn to be more open with their operations.
Yes, but the problem here is all these services are using a singular DNS service which is under attack.
Well it doesn't take a genius to see that won't be the case much longer.
A fool and his money...
...don't consider Microsoft products because of bias?
That's where you were going with that, right?