Slashdot Mirror


User: Lanteran

Lanteran's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
854
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 854

  1. Re:What a surprise on Introducing Students To the World of Open Source · · Score: 1

    No. In my experience, most CS students now are part of the 'digital generation' and want to get an easy A or an easy degree. Not that this (introduction to the world of FLOSS) is a bad thing, quite the opposite. But still, for a perspective, most of the people in a web design class I'm in use Internet explorer and design all sites with WYSIWYGs.

  2. Re:Anything over 7 years ... on UK Reviewing Copyright Laws · · Score: 1

    I say 20.

  3. Re:Bad Guys on US Wants Upper Hand In Battling High-Tech Bad Guys · · Score: 1

    most humans see the world in black and white, rather than shades of gray.

  4. Re:Isn't this democracy? on US Wants Upper Hand In Battling High-Tech Bad Guys · · Score: 1
    Just something I've always thought about the failings in several traditional forms of governments:
    • Republics (representative democracies)- Work great in the beginning but degenerate into oligarchy. This is fairly close to inevitable.
    • Absolute Democracies- Work well in the beginning, degenerate into mob rule like in ancient Greece. Can be lessened with good education systems.
    • Benevolent dictatorships- Obviously degenerate into malevolent dictatorships. Inevitable.
    • Anarcy- works great for about 5 minutes then you get conquered by a warlord. Solvable if everyone sticks to their guns, but that presents a whole new set of problems

    Meta government looks interesting, and I'm not sure how well it would work, but I'm keeping an eye on it from now on.

  5. Re:describing a family is family unfriendly? on TV Tropes Self-Censoring Under Google Pressure · · Score: 1

    If I go to google.cn, it's still just a link box to google.hk. I did a test search on Tienanmen square, and it showed relevant results.

  6. Re:describing a family is family unfriendly? on TV Tropes Self-Censoring Under Google Pressure · · Score: 1

    It'd probably be canceled out by google's ending their censorship in china. Not that I disagree with you.

  7. Re:Nuclear Paranoia on Researchers Race To Recover Radioactive Rabbits · · Score: 1

    actually if I recall correctly, beta radiation is fairly dangerous and penetrates the skin quite well; its alpha that can't do much of anything outside the body.

  8. Re:Am I the only one who is confused... on Despite FTC Settlement, Intel Can Ship Oak Trail Without PCIe · · Score: 1

    I like and buy AMD CPUs, but I've always preferred nVidia for graphics cards; mostly because I run linux, for which ATI/AMD cards have notoriously poor support compared to nvidia. Vendor lock in, no matter the company is a terrible thing, I and everyone else should be able to get GPUs independent of CPUs, or any other hardware for that matter.

  9. Re:Should be good for the economy on 2010 Election Results Are In · · Score: 1

    should've elected a knight?

  10. KISS.. on An Anonymous, Verifiable E-Voting Tech · · Score: 1

    Seriously; what they need to do if they want to stop voter fraud and corruption (which they don't- its how they get into office, but this is if they did) they would just make the machines extremely simple single purpose hardware. What's it take to record a value (Say 0 for GOP, 1 for Dem, 2 for libertarian etc.) and send it in to be counted? Not much; barley anything. Hell, I could probably build one keeping the price in the double digits with parts from radioshack (though maybe I'm overestimating my abilities).
    Reminds me of these xkcds a bit:http://xkcd.com/801/ http://xkcd.com/463/

  11. Re:Remember, kids... on Microsoft Outlines Windows Phone 7 Kill Switch · · Score: 1

    GPLv3 anyone?

  12. Re:Wrong 'Star' on Real-Time Holograms Beam Closer To Reality · · Score: 1

    that would require some type of force field technology or else you'd just walk right through. If they got that out of the way, most holodecks would need a good cleaning crew, preferably robotic.

  13. Re:Technophobic Tea Party Wingnuts on Net Neutrality Supporters Hammered In Elections · · Score: 1

    that's strange; here in the conservative south, everyone (technologically illiterate or not) I explain NN to supports it fully; tea partiers included. Maybe you're just bad at explaining it?

  14. Re:One step forward on Net Neutrality Supporters Hammered In Elections · · Score: 1

    or make lobbying count as treason in a court. And yeah, violent revolution's great.

  15. Re:Well I'm going to say congrats... on W3C Says IE9 Is Currently the Most HTML5 Compatible Browser · · Score: 1

    People will stop using IE6 when windows XP finally dies. Late 357th century, if ever.

  16. Re:Truth is stranger than fiction on UK Wants ISPs To Be Responsible For Third Party Content Online · · Score: 1

    "The revolution shall come from within."- I just made that up

  17. Re:KDE needs some competition. on KDE Developers Discuss Merging Libraries With Qt · · Score: 1

    *shouts* THIS. IS. LINUX!!!
    Use whatever the hell DE you like, you can change it at any time.

  18. Re:100 Billion? on Is the ISS Really Worth $100 Billion? · · Score: 1

    A tax dedicated to furthering technological progress? Experts say it'll happen on February 31, 2011.

  19. Re:Look at it this way on Is the ISS Really Worth $100 Billion? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Something I found extremely disturbing when comparing proposed space travel budgets as opposed to government overspending: The (extremely bloated) nasa mars mission plan in the early 90's, which called for orbital fuel depots, a quadrupling of the size of the ISS, lunar bases and ship yards plus a whole host of other stuff cost 450B$, or a fraction of the combined recent government bailouts of big business. Mars direct, zubrin's plan, called for something like 55B$, including mars habitation units left behind and fuel refineries.

  20. Re:for those too lazy on IE9 May Not Be Enough To Save IE · · Score: 1

    I'd argue that w3c is generally visited by web developers. You're pretty much guaranteed to get a lower IE turnout among those who actually code for it.

  21. Re:I quite fancy giving IE9 a try on IE9 May Not Be Enough To Save IE · · Score: 1

    I still want to know what idiot had the idea of putting windows 7 on a netbook...

  22. Re:Competition is Good on IE9 May Not Be Enough To Save IE · · Score: 1

    I like having them at each other's throats (if they weren't, we'd get another IE6) but I still think IE should be killed off quickly, yet painfully.

  23. Re:Save? on IE9 May Not Be Enough To Save IE · · Score: 1

    Assuming you're not joking: WebM

  24. Re:Hang on a minute... on IE9 May Not Be Enough To Save IE · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if its available for windows, but here's a useful extension that I use to test minefield and beta firefoxes alongside my usual 3.6:https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/141505/

  25. Re:Silver Lining on IE9 May Not Be Enough To Save IE · · Score: 1

    Though it is, my bet is that we'll have to continue coding for IE6 until: A. Windows XP dies (2040's, 50's maybe) or B. Until free software conquers the computing world.