If people get in wrecks and become dependent on government assistance programs as a result of disabilities caused by their injuries, is it wrong to put in place laws that can be demonstrably shown to lessen the severity of those potential injuries? In one instance, you may be burdening individuals with laws "for their own protection," while in another instance you may be potentially burdening tax payers with providing support for someone who is otherwise incapable of providing for their self.
Accusations of rape are already written off with questions of "what was she wearing?" or "shouldn't she have know better than to be there?" or "what about those Stubenville student's bright future as football stars?"
How does dubbing a movie that has nothing to do with Navajo culture help preserve Navajo culture? Not trying to troll, I am asking honestly. It seems a bit insulting, the insinuation being that the whole of their culture is distilled down to their native language.
The Black Cloud is one of my favorite novels ever, and it appears to be out of print, at least in the States. October the First Is Too Late was quite an interesting idea, though I think I like it more in retrospect than I did as I was reading it.
It isn't really superheros, but it may be something he could enjoy. I don't recall if there was anything that would be inappropriate for for someone of his age aside from a little bit of violence.
One of these time Russia will have a successful mission to Mars. Nineteenth time's a charm! (All joking aside, I would like to see these missions become a success.)
The article makes it seem as though the offer will only be extended to those who, due to flying frequently, are invited to the program by air lines. So really it is for CEOs, celebrities, and politicians that fly frequently to avoid those few run-ins that they have had in the past. Maybe it is just cynicism, but I am feeling like this is just "we are trying to be better" posturing masking an attempt hopefully prevent accidentally groping someone that can use their social position to have their voice easily heard by a large number of people.
There is the manual by pop/dance music pranksters the KLF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manual). Which, of course, they put out after releasing the song "Doctorin' the TARDIS" under the name The Timelords.
The price seems, how do I say this politely... a bit steep. You could pick up a second hand MIDI foot controller and something like Bome's MIDI translator, midiStroke or bash something together in the programing language of your choosing. And I know at the very least the GIMP supports MIDI input devices, I wouldn't be surprised it there are other programs that do not as well.
An atheist wouldn't have to define what god is, and religions and religious people most definitely define what their god/gods are. I am not saying that there is proof for their not being a god, I am saying that the proof doesn't point to a god. I feel there is a clear distinction in the two. For you to not believe in unicorns doesn't require you to have proof for their nonexistence, it requires proof for their existence. One wouldn't believe one way or another if what a unicorn is wasn't already defined, it would be a non-issue because without a definition the ideology is nonexistant. Or, rather, by default an ideology has a definition because the definition creates the ideology. In a logical argument the burden of proof lies on the holder of the belief. I am not making a claim that there is no god, I am stating the fact that the evidence that I see doesn't point to a god.
Slashdot Mirror
If people get in wrecks and become dependent on government assistance programs as a result of disabilities caused by their injuries, is it wrong to put in place laws that can be demonstrably shown to lessen the severity of those potential injuries? In one instance, you may be burdening individuals with laws "for their own protection," while in another instance you may be potentially burdening tax payers with providing support for someone who is otherwise incapable of providing for their self.
Accusations of rape are already written off with questions of "what was she wearing?" or "shouldn't she have know better than to be there?" or "what about those Stubenville student's bright future as football stars?"
How does dubbing a movie that has nothing to do with Navajo culture help preserve Navajo culture? Not trying to troll, I am asking honestly. It seems a bit insulting, the insinuation being that the whole of their culture is distilled down to their native language.
'Saturn is the first planet to show significant interaction between its atmosphere and ring system.'
I mean, wouldn't you expect the Saturn system to be the first place you would find something like that?
To be fair, when it rains, the internet at my house goes out when it rains. Maybe all of these 51% of people surveyed live in the ghetto too?
The Black Cloud is one of my favorite novels ever, and it appears to be out of print, at least in the States. October the First Is Too Late was quite an interesting idea, though I think I like it more in retrospect than I did as I was reading it.
Are you issuing a formal challenge that they "up the ante"?
It isn't really superheros, but it may be something he could enjoy. I don't recall if there was anything that would be inappropriate for for someone of his age aside from a little bit of violence.
They are in our reference frame.
Yes, because the Moon emits its own, self-generated light (of course I do understand that you are not being serious).
From the article: "[...]and the researchers aren't claiming to have refuted the giant impact hypothesis."
...'70s porn collection.
One of these time Russia will have a successful mission to Mars. Nineteenth time's a charm! (All joking aside, I would like to see these missions become a success.)
The article makes it seem as though the offer will only be extended to those who, due to flying frequently, are invited to the program by air lines. So really it is for CEOs, celebrities, and politicians that fly frequently to avoid those few run-ins that they have had in the past. Maybe it is just cynicism, but I am feeling like this is just "we are trying to be better" posturing masking an attempt hopefully prevent accidentally groping someone that can use their social position to have their voice easily heard by a large number of people.
:s/$/4
Gah! I am a failure, no wonder no one likes me.
No, Prisoner $ is not a number, he is a free man.
Freedom African American.
Okay, My eyes are opened, I see no link to support you assertion.
There is the manual by pop/dance music pranksters the KLF (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manual). Which, of course, they put out after releasing the song "Doctorin' the TARDIS" under the name The Timelords.
It looks like Abraham Lincoln?
1) Cut off Sony rooted hand.
2) Replace with chainsaw.
3) ????
4) Kill demons.
Well, yes, in Soviet Russia GIMP controls you with foot peddles. But here, in God's 'Merica it is the other way around.
The price seems, how do I say this politely... a bit steep. You could pick up a second hand MIDI foot controller and something like Bome's MIDI translator, midiStroke or bash something together in the programing language of your choosing. And I know at the very least the GIMP supports MIDI input devices, I wouldn't be surprised it there are other programs that do not as well.
An atheist wouldn't have to define what god is, and religions and religious people most definitely define what their god/gods are. I am not saying that there is proof for their not being a god, I am saying that the proof doesn't point to a god. I feel there is a clear distinction in the two. For you to not believe in unicorns doesn't require you to have proof for their nonexistence, it requires proof for their existence. One wouldn't believe one way or another if what a unicorn is wasn't already defined, it would be a non-issue because without a definition the ideology is nonexistant. Or, rather, by default an ideology has a definition because the definition creates the ideology. In a logical argument the burden of proof lies on the holder of the belief. I am not making a claim that there is no god, I am stating the fact that the evidence that I see doesn't point to a god.
Noah Everett will think of the children! Our hero has finally arrived! Rejoice!