Really? You think your leaders are "forced" by the terrorists and then take your freedoms?
Have you ever considered that maybe those leaders will seize any opportunity they can to create fear so that it allows them to effectively seize more power (by taking away your freedoms, amongst other things) ?
BZ: +Linus Torvalds I've got to disagree about the connecting to other networks. We have students that connect to other networks to bypass our internet filtering. It makes it a pain, because they neglect to reconnect to our wireless before logging off. Then other students can't log on or can't connect to their server shares.
Linus Torvalds - +Blair Z: if you want to restrict people from doing everyday things, make that the uncommon option, and add a checkmark for it.
The link between brackets notes that you're a bunch of years late for that joke. Don't worry, you can still be original by copying a recent troll post.
How about "Interpol coordinates arrests of 25 Suspected Anonymous Hackers".
I'm aware that the way in which english media words their titles might be different though. It might be too long and the use of the word "of" might be unnecessary.
Have you ever thought that it's because "your politics" influence the whole world in very relevant ways? Specially considering the warmongering attitude and the very real ability to see it through.
Being sexually promiscuous means you're a nymphomaniac? You're not only mixing around the different definitions (that's not how it works) but stretching things according to what I assume are your personal moral codes.
No, you're not right but no, considering the way you argue, you won't change your mind either.
I might not have gotten the exact interpretation of impersonal but you're the one making up your own interpretations for some words but following the dictionary for others:
Let's review the word "Whore" shall we.
Whore: 1. A prostitute. 2. A person considered sexually promiscuous. 3. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain. intr.v. whored, whoring, whores 1. To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute. 2. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations. 3. To compromise one's principles for personal gain.
I'd say that if you disregard people's feelings you're insensitive or a jerk or an asshole but it definitely doesn't sound like whore is the proper word.
impersonal level? WTF does that even mean? Do we need to "Hollywood love" people in order to sleep with them or else we will be called whores?
Infidelity (breaking trust in a relationship) is fucked up but if they're not in a relationship women and men should be able to fuck as many people as they want.
Sex is NOT wrong people. Stop carrying around religious mandates.
That's something not many people is discussing here due to the lack of effectiveness of the "solution" but an implementation of such a system shouldn't be patentable. It's not inventive. A bad idea but an [b]obvious[/b] one.
Re:Such systems have been proposed before
on
The Zuckerberg Tax
·
· Score: 1
There's plenty of tax evasions in Argentina though, when you're in league with the right people in the government, you won't get any surprise visits by the AFIP (Federal Administration of public earnings),
And there's also the straw owner tactic to disperse wealth and avoid huge tax margins.
You've provided an interesting link though, I guess I'll give it a good read and compare some countries.
Isn't it just way simpler to divide the nation into 2 ideological factions and raise enmity between them to avoid a unified front against organized forces?
"When someone makes you laugh, they're terribly wrong. When you are annoyed by what they say, you must know they are lying. But when they make you terribly angry, then you may safely assume they are right"
I once wrote that phrase in my phone and every time I stumble upon it I feel it's completely spot on.
I thought people had learned after Iraq but sadly, they haven't.
The worst thing about the Iran Propaganda is that they won't even have to admit they were wrong.
Instead of "Ok, There were no WMDs but... Democracy! Dictator!" it will be "We stopped them before they could build the Nukes! Also... Democracy! Dictator!".
Slashdot Mirror
How about clean while you're there like it happens in our place? (Unless you can't handle a minor interruption once a day)
Ohhhhhh, so that's where Clouds come from. I get it now.
Really? You think your leaders are "forced" by the terrorists and then take your freedoms?
Have you ever considered that maybe those leaders will seize any opportunity they can to create fear so that it allows them to effectively seize more power (by taking away your freedoms, amongst other things) ?
smooth.
The link between brackets notes that you're a bunch of years late for that joke. Don't worry, you can still be original by copying a recent troll post.
I'm still wondering why a lot of these things feel like only being able to drive a car if you know how the engine works in detail (and more).
Sure, programmers and computer enthusiasts might be able to deal with this sort of thing but anyone else probably will be paralyzed.
Yes, I'm aware there are several distros suiting different needs but the general feeling always seems to be that you need to know one too many things.
How about "Interpol coordinates arrests of 25 Suspected Anonymous Hackers".
I'm aware that the way in which english media words their titles might be different though. It might be too long and the use of the word "of" might be unnecessary.
If he keeps making films like The Lord of the Rings and King Kong just let him keep on selling.
Have you ever thought that it's because "your politics" influence the whole world in very relevant ways? Specially considering the warmongering attitude and the very real ability to see it through.
Being sexually promiscuous means you're a nymphomaniac? You're not only mixing around the different definitions (that's not how it works) but stretching things according to what I assume are your personal moral codes.
No, you're not right but no, considering the way you argue, you won't change your mind either.
I wish you lots of sex and have a nice day. :)
I might not have gotten the exact interpretation of impersonal but you're the one making up your own interpretations for some words but following the dictionary for others:
Let's review the word "Whore" shall we.
Whore:
1. A prostitute.
2. A person considered sexually promiscuous.
3. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.
intr.v. whored, whoring, whores
1. To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute.
2. To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations.
3. To compromise one's principles for personal gain.
I'd say that if you disregard people's feelings you're insensitive or a jerk or an asshole but it definitely doesn't sound like whore is the proper word.
Same here, I will be sharing it with some people who I think will find it interesting but might not have done so yet.
impersonal level? WTF does that even mean? Do we need to "Hollywood love" people in order to sleep with them or else we will be called whores?
Infidelity (breaking trust in a relationship) is fucked up but if they're not in a relationship women and men should be able to fuck as many people as they want.
Sex is NOT wrong people. Stop carrying around religious mandates.
and yet, photos of you will be uploaded anyway. Time, place, context, additional information via comments...
Not so easy to "stay off the grid" (even if you tried)
Just make one up or hype up improbable or outdated ones like USA does all the time.
arghh... bbcode instead of html... I'm ashamed of myself.
That's something not many people is discussing here due to the lack of effectiveness of the "solution" but an implementation of such a system shouldn't be patentable. It's not inventive. A bad idea but an [b]obvious[/b] one.
if the guy's name is script, then yes.
There's plenty of tax evasions in Argentina though, when you're in league with the right people in the government, you won't get any surprise visits by the AFIP (Federal Administration of public earnings),
And there's also the straw owner tactic to disperse wealth and avoid huge tax margins.
You've provided an interesting link though, I guess I'll give it a good read and compare some countries.
Isn't it just way simpler to divide the nation into 2 ideological factions and raise enmity between them to avoid a unified front against organized forces?
oh wait...
Is that you Voltaire?
how sure are you that you're not being spied on as well? and I mean you and everyone else who uses cell phones.
"When someone makes you laugh, they're terribly wrong. When you are annoyed by what they say, you must know they are lying. But when they make you terribly angry, then you may safely assume they are right"
I once wrote that phrase in my phone and every time I stumble upon it I feel it's completely spot on.
When he started that war against Libya with congressional approval... oh wait...
I thought people had learned after Iraq but sadly, they haven't.
The worst thing about the Iran Propaganda is that they won't even have to admit they were wrong.
Instead of "Ok, There were no WMDs but... Democracy! Dictator!" it will be "We stopped them before they could build the Nukes! Also... Democracy! Dictator!".