#!/bin/sh sudo mod parent up #on science and stupid girls*1 : #*1 not all girls are like storms evidently wget http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhGuXCuDb1U mod me offtopic
ms-dos with netbeui is still in use in some shitty but unkillable P.O.S. system, some old automation monitoring system and a countless list of old but supported embedded system so it is still alive. Unless you meant alive == Microsoft supported
in ui design I learned that people are sufficiently similar that you can test on 7 randomly chosen subject and if your ui work on all of them it will be good for 95% of the population, those 5% be damned. People are not that different inside so unless you are looking for a 1/100000 effect you don't need a big sample, around 30 will be sufficient in most of the case, I don't remember the mathematical proof but it exist.
democratic system usually have safeguard against this sort of thing. If yours are not working anymore elect different officials from never tried before party.
That is what regulation by democratic government are for. If the populace want to have something ban, let them do it. What I oppose is the artificial slowing down of research by incompetent ethic committee that don't even know the problem domain.
Some risk analysis committee composed of emeritus engineers, scientist and doctors would be a better alternative and keep the soft sciences major out of there.
Burn all the ethics committee, they slow down research and they do not stop abuse; they only stop bad feelings into the weak minded politically correct, they also provide jobs for those wuss. I say burn them! Burn them with napalm, that will teach them!
go read about Microsoft research. They contribute a lot to fundamental computer sciences; this is not product oriented unless you consider things like research on monadic programming a product.
Slashdot Mirror
enough with the voluntary fascism.
0.0.0.0 fail faster
things that cause suffering*1 are not meant to profit from 1- pain != suffering
#!/bin/sh
sudo mod parent up
#on science and stupid girls*1 :
#*1 not all girls are like storms evidently
wget http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhGuXCuDb1U
mod me offtopic
alertpay, they are based near Montreal
ms-dos with netbeui is still in use in some shitty but unkillable P.O.S. system, some old automation monitoring system and a countless list of old but supported embedded system so it is still alive. Unless you meant alive == Microsoft supported
BC Bud or Quebec Gold or GTFO :P
the listened far to literary to the Google suggestion of doing dumb thing
You fall in the 5% like almost everybody here.....
in ui design I learned that people are sufficiently similar that you can test on 7 randomly chosen subject and if your ui work on all of them it will be good for 95% of the population, those 5% be damned. People are not that different inside so unless you are looking for a 1/100000 effect you don't need a big sample, around 30 will be sufficient in most of the case, I don't remember the mathematical proof but it exist.
However if your are doing a research on something with a great variance like food preferences you will need a bigger sample. You can read more about the optimal sample size in those paper : http://www.ime.usp.br/~abe/ICOTS7/Proceedings/PDFs/InvitedPapers/3J3_ALIA.pdf and http://nordbotten.com/articles/OptSampleSize.pdf
agreed, but for the marketer I would use a mix agent orange, BZ and sarin, it is a way more painful death ;)
democratic system usually have safeguard against this sort of thing. If yours are not working anymore elect different officials from never tried before party.
The risk analysis committee that I have proposed would probably have rejected the first one and accepted the second.
Also, if I am terminally ill use me as a experimental subject, I won't care at all, I will be proud.
That is what regulation by democratic government are for. If the populace want to have something ban, let them do it. What I oppose is the artificial slowing down of research by incompetent ethic committee that don't even know the problem domain.
Some risk analysis committee composed of emeritus engineers, scientist and doctors would be a better alternative and keep the soft sciences major out of there.
Burn all the ethics committee, they slow down research and they do not stop abuse; they only stop bad feelings into the weak minded politically correct, they also provide jobs for those wuss. I say burn them! Burn them with napalm, that will teach them!
posted to cancel moderation
Android was bought when Google bought Android Inc. This is not a labs product, it was innovation like most other big corps innovate...
go read about Microsoft research. They contribute a lot to fundamental computer sciences; this is not product oriented unless you consider things like research on monadic programming a product.
http://www.koders.com/ not as good but almost there
One day you will die from a bad subluxation. I am sure that Dr.Bob could confirm it.
This must be full of bad porn and sensitive documents.
Do you honestly believe objects falling inside an atmosphere infinitely accelerate?
No, I just honestly asked about what Vmax means. For all I know it could have meant maximum Vector or maximum Viscosity or maximum Vhatever.
What is that Vmax you are referring to ? For me it is a maximum voltage and in context that does not make sense.
It happen in Europe sometime as I had my scrotum checked at a German airport.