Get some IPv6 endpoints (and subnets) from he tunnelbroken and set up some basic ipv6 linux firewalls at both ends. Ditch all the crazy NAT/VPN crap and just go 100% peer to peer.
The moderators have no control over the main issue, which is that the/. editors can barely even manage to fix typos in their summaries, let alone gigantic factual errors.
I was there on the other hand, and the people I knew back then would have had pieces of Gamergaters/MRAs/KiAs/and/pol in their crap. You guys aren't fit to name the people who were there at the Internet's day one.
Slashdot Mirror
alias ds="sudo aptitude update; sudo aptitude install debsecan \`secan-update\` dpkg aptitude debian-archive-keyring"
function secan-update() /etc/default/debsecan
{
.
debsecan --only-fixed --format packages --suite $SUITE
}
And I see timothy still hasn't bothered to correct his idiotic headline.
http://science.slashdot.org/st...
Timothy's headline:
"Double-Dynamo Model Predicts 60% Fall In Solar Output In The 2030s"
Actual headline:
"Solar activity predicted to fall 60% in 2030s, to 'mini ice age' levels: Sun driven by double dynamo"
The more onerous and stupid the law, the more likely law enforcement gets exemptions from them.
err tunnelbroker
http://tunnelbroker.net/
Get some IPv6 endpoints (and subnets) from he tunnelbroken and set up some basic ipv6 linux firewalls at both ends. Ditch all the crazy NAT/VPN crap and just go 100% peer to peer.
batch = .bat .sh
script =
But it inflicted NetworkManager on us. A million /etc/resolv.confs cried out at once in terror, and were suddenly silenced.
Thanks Lennart Poettering.
Dickhead.
He lost me at the word "batch".
NetworkManager.
STOP OVERWRITING MY /etc/resolv.conf
And forget about aptitude purge or hold.
Thought I'd smelled a rat. The headline is deceptive (likely deliberately).
With timothy, Hanlon's razor applies.
The moderators have no control over the main issue, which is that the /. editors can barely even manage to fix typos in their summaries, let alone gigantic factual errors.
Is there anyway we can send him over to reddit once and for all?
Activity != output, dumbass.
Post scarcity is a spectrum, not an absolute. What kinds of commodities will you kill for to survive?
HELLO FREND!
Not a dime to the FSF or EFF
I'm in my early 40's, and I'm starting to run into a variety of back problems from poor posture / poor back muscle tone
Get to the gym. Get a trainer.
DL, squat, BP. Then DL and squat some more. Make sure you have a trainer that can force you to always do every rep properly.
Rinse. Repeat.
Systemd, avahi-daemon, pulseaudio, networkmanager. What an awesome combination of great software!
I was there on the other hand, and the people I knew back then would have had pieces of Gamergaters/MRAs/KiAs/and /pol in their crap. You guys aren't fit to name the people who were there at the Internet's day one.
Domain Name: dubliminal.com
Registry Domain ID: 1896846773_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS server: whois.NameBright.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namebright.com/
Updated Date: 2015-01-19T00:00:00.000Z
Creation Date: 2015-01-19T07:00:00.000Z
2015? Really? Don't make me laugh.
Not only that, but no artificial limit to g. No pilot to keep conscious.
We're not talking about a "table of contents" here.
We're taking about copying a spec.
E.g "add(x,y) returns the sum of x and y"
Copying the spec results in
"add(x,y) returns the sum of x and y"
Implementing the spec results in
"add(x,y) { return x+y }"
One is a copy. One is not.
Adhering to an API is not copying the API.
Only copying an API (as in copying the text that describes the rules) is copying an API.
Again, how is adhering to a specification in any way copying anything? It is a specification: a list of rules to follow.
Now copying the list is copying the spec. But following the rules is not copying the spec.
That is to say, only an idiot claims otherwise.
An idiot.
Adhering to a spec is not copying the spec.
Only actually COPYING the text that defines the spec is copying the spec.