And it would make a terrible driver's car because all of those things that make a car autonomous have severe engineering drawbacks (weight, complexity, reliability at the edge of the performance envelope, etc.) for track use.
And if you are writing a scroller, the character's position is actually fixed, and moving "left" means moving the frame (background, sprites and all) right.
The problem Broadcom has in comparison with other SoC makers is they never open source their drivers except under extreme duress.
Broadcom absolutely sucks to work with in every way. They are truly awful, even if you are doing closed source development and sign all their NDAs ad nauseum.
Bill Gate's dream is a world completely run by proprietary software, and a business model subsidized by government enforced statutory monopoly.
Artificial barriers to entry is exactly preventing technology from being available to the underprivileged.
The idea that Gates wants ANYBODY to have cheap computing technology is laughable. Water? Fine. Anything more advance than that? Tough luck. Pay your lords, serfs.
The negative connotation of the term was invented by guys calling eachother "bro" and engaging in misogynist behaviour which sometimes includes predatory sexual practices that can extend to rape.
They did not assign that meaning to the word bro. You (and others) just did, to disparage a subgroup of men, not women.
Also, a maximum PPM of toxic elements would be helpful so we can figure out if we have to go full triple filtered reverse osmosis or if a standard carbon filter would do the trick.
Sorta like they did for PPMs of aggression, aka, microaggressions?
Slashdot Mirror
/. can't even manage basic editorial tasks?
Why would you be able to detect the thrust when applied to the ISS but not on a bench test in the lab?
Clickbait tactic... it's despicable.
Netcraft confirms it.
The company is not providing a server, nor the bandwidth, nor the maintenance of the server, nor customer support for the clients.
Only took 15 years to get tcp/ip into windows.
Makes sense it took another 15 to get it a reasonable shell.
Nissan GT-R already does that. It is boring on the track.
And it would make a terrible driver's car because all of those things that make a car autonomous have severe engineering drawbacks (weight, complexity, reliability at the edge of the performance envelope, etc.) for track use.
Almost every single friend of mine that owns a Porsche tracks it.
You must have crappy friends... or none that own Porsches.
"It's about low-end power, not torque."
LOL wut?
R2D2 never (successfully) incapacitated dozens of storm troopers with only rocks.
This changes nothing, both legally and technically. The API is exactly the same.
Stupid.
And if you are writing a scroller, the character's position is actually fixed, and moving "left" means moving the frame (background, sprites and all) right.
Under what circumstances would the CIA NOT want to smear Snowden? I see absolutely no situation where they would want to do anything else.
They have zero credibility.
The problem Broadcom has in comparison with other SoC makers is they never open source their drivers except under extreme duress.
Broadcom absolutely sucks to work with in every way. They are truly awful, even if you are doing closed source development and sign all their NDAs ad nauseum.
..
https://groups.google.com/foru...
What would we do without visionaries like Bill Gates imagining cheaper computers?
He never imagined cheap technology for anybody. He wants everybody to pay up, always has.
How could he get as rich as he did w/o government subsidy in the form of statutory monopoly?
Bill Gate's dream is a world completely run by proprietary software, and a business model subsidized by government enforced statutory monopoly.
Artificial barriers to entry is exactly preventing technology from being available to the underprivileged.
The idea that Gates wants ANYBODY to have cheap computing technology is laughable. Water? Fine. Anything more advance than that? Tough luck. Pay your lords, serfs.
Pointless without bash.
I''ll stick with cygwin, thanks.
The negative connotation of the term was invented by guys calling eachother "bro" and engaging in misogynist behaviour which sometimes includes predatory sexual practices that can extend to rape.
They did not assign that meaning to the word bro. You (and others) just did, to disparage a subgroup of men, not women.
Hmm, so you state that I'm clearly a guy who hates men,
Why else would you call a misandrist term misogynist? Especially if the negative connotation of the term was invented by misandrists?
Also, a maximum PPM of toxic elements would be helpful so we can figure out if we have to go full triple filtered reverse osmosis or if a standard carbon filter would do the trick.
Sorta like they did for PPMs of aggression, aka, microaggressions?
Pluralizing "aggression" wasn't enough for them.
I'd instantly get a mental image of the developers being a bunch of frat boys high-fiving calling each other bro.
So because you're clearly a misandrist (and assume "bro" denigrates men), "bro" is somehow misogynist instead?
I'm not even sure Orwell envisioned such a level of semantic contortion was possible.
"bro" is offensive
Reminder: The only negative connotation to "bro" is against MEN, not women.
How is that even a clearly misandrist term becomes magically misogynist because it is sexist?
I prefer lord/serf