Not only did the Wish Book last until 2007 (well after the regular catalogs disappeared), they brought back last year. It's only about 120 pages (about a third of the size of the classic Wish Books), but it is still there.
One: The story is fifty years old. Two: It's not a secret. Gil deduces the fact that it's a murder immediately after observing the crime scene (the spliced short cord made it kinda obvious). The plot is in finding out who the murderer *is*.
Maybe where you live, but not here. The plates have to be registered to a specific vehicle, but they can be reregistered to another vehicle, and when you sell the vehicle, the plates are unregistered from the vehicle and stay with you. A set of plates can, and often does, move from vehicle to vehicle as the owner sells an old one and buys a new one, using the old plates on the new car saving the cost of new plates (but not the registration fees).
I recall that. It turned out that it was a murder; the murderer intentionally set the wire at an intensity well above safety limits and also spliced the power cord short. All the victim had to do to get to something to eat was unplug the wire (there was food right in the next room)--but he couldn't do it.
Of course the driver has a driver's license, and the license plate is registered to a specific vehicle. However, when the vehicle is sold, the plate follows the owner, not the vehicle, and it ceases to be registered to that vehicle (which is why every vehicle sale has to reported to the state). Plates can be reregistered to another vehicle at the owner's discretion; as you say, you can swap the plates from a blue 2001 Toyota Corolla to a white 1993 Ford Escort provided you own both cars, but you can't do this without filing the proper forms with the DMV, This is of course tracked by the state and any vehicle operated on the public roads must have a valid set of plates registered to it (unsold cars sitting on dealer lots have no plates since they aren't being driven).
Depends on the state. In my own state of Viriginia, the plates belong to the owner, not the car. If you sell your car, you keep the plates (and possibly reregister them to your new car). The buyer has to get his own plates for the car he just bought.
The failure modes in a hosting service are more insidious, when they don't want your services to be up, they take them down, all at once. No amount of being good about your availability zones and such will stand up to the reality that your vendor can shut down *everything*.
Your vendor can't shut down everything if they don't *have* everything. That's why any cloud service redundancy worthy of the name will have backups sourced to other vendors.
As other people have pointed out, the magic letters here are "SLA". You must have a contract stating what the vendor's responsibilities are and be able to enforce that contract. Otherwise, you don't have a business, you just have a hobby.
No, not his speeder. He sometimes flew a T-65, a small one-seater that was actually related to the X-wing. We never saw him actually fly one, but it was referred to in dialog.
Luke had piloted spacecraft before, and used to hunt small flying prey in them. You can argue that shouldn't have been enough, but he was apparently a pilot with some experience.
Why even continue with the interview when 3 minutes into it, it's apparent there's going to be no substantive information exchanged?
But there *was* substantive information being exchanged--that Atari was utterly clueless about their own project. Granted, that probably wasn't the information they wanted to impart...
Listening to the 10 clips there was painful. Hard to listen to someone who's supposed to be a COO making up shit / having to cover for lack of any product.
That's why being a reporter is paid job--you have to put up with this sort of thing.
At that point you would just save your dignity and end the interview huh?
It wasn't the *reporter's* dignity being lost. As far as the Atari COO was concerned, I can only agree with you.
the journalist was wrong for posting an article about said unfinished product.
Why? Certainly if Atari is willing to give interviews on it, the reporter not only can but should publish about it. But even if Atari hadn't, why shouldn't the reporter report?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Not only did the Wish Book last until 2007 (well after the regular catalogs disappeared), they brought back last year. It's only about 120 pages (about a third of the size of the classic Wish Books), but it is still there.
National AIR and Space Administration, Einstein. It has nothing to do with space, but everything to do with air.
One: The story is fifty years old.
Two: It's not a secret. Gil deduces the fact that it's a murder immediately after observing the crime scene (the spliced short cord made it kinda obvious). The plot is in finding out who the murderer *is*.
Maybe where you live, but not here. The plates have to be registered to a specific vehicle, but they can be reregistered to another vehicle, and when you sell the vehicle, the plates are unregistered from the vehicle and stay with you. A set of plates can, and often does, move from vehicle to vehicle as the owner sells an old one and buys a new one, using the old plates on the new car saving the cost of new plates (but not the registration fees).
I recall that. It turned out that it was a murder; the murderer intentionally set the wire at an intensity well above safety limits and also spliced the power cord short. All the victim had to do to get to something to eat was unplug the wire (there was food right in the next room)--but he couldn't do it.
Of course the driver has a driver's license, and the license plate is registered to a specific vehicle. However, when the vehicle is sold, the plate follows the owner, not the vehicle, and it ceases to be registered to that vehicle (which is why every vehicle sale has to reported to the state). Plates can be reregistered to another vehicle at the owner's discretion; as you say, you can swap the plates from a blue 2001 Toyota Corolla to a white 1993 Ford Escort provided you own both cars, but you can't do this without filing the proper forms with the DMV, This is of course tracked by the state and any vehicle operated on the public roads must have a valid set of plates registered to it (unsold cars sitting on dealer lots have no plates since they aren't being driven).
Depends on the state. In my own state of Viriginia, the plates belong to the owner, not the car. If you sell your car, you keep the plates (and possibly reregister them to your new car). The buyer has to get his own plates for the car he just bought.
You not only agree to be tracked everywhere you drive, but you pay $700 plus a monthly fee for the privilege? Are you sure you heard them right?
Your vendor can't shut down everything if they don't *have* everything. That's why any cloud service redundancy worthy of the name will have backups sourced to other vendors.
As other people have pointed out, the magic letters here are "SLA". You must have a contract stating what the vendor's responsibilities are and be able to enforce that contract. Otherwise, you don't have a business, you just have a hobby.
Same here. Had difficulties getting to Slashdot and Blizzard, and some other sites were loading oddly, but that's all gone away now.
The US government didn't agree to it. Obama agreed to it. Without any backing from Congress. And now Obama's gone.
Real-time shooters usually move kinda fast to rely on text chat.
"Only one ICO held in 2017 did not contain any critical flaws."
And that one would be...?
Are they gonna bring back the Giant-Size Man-Thing?
No, not his speeder. He sometimes flew a T-65, a small one-seater that was actually related to the X-wing. We never saw him actually fly one, but it was referred to in dialog.
Now, Anakin in the prequel, *that* was just ridiculous.
Luke had piloted spacecraft before, and used to hunt small flying prey in them. You can argue that shouldn't have been enough, but he was apparently a pilot with some experience.
Rachel Welch is too old.
But there *was* substantive information being exchanged--that Atari was utterly clueless about their own project. Granted, that probably wasn't the information they wanted to impart...
That's why being a reporter is paid job--you have to put up with this sort of thing.
It wasn't the *reporter's* dignity being lost. As far as the Atari COO was concerned, I can only agree with you.
But probably not a ruby.
Why? Certainly if Atari is willing to give interviews on it, the reporter not only can but should publish about it. But even if Atari hadn't, why shouldn't the reporter report?
We now can have hackers tapping all those cameras in schools!
And fails anyways.