Not only would a laptop packed with explosives still bring down a plane while in the cargo hold, but anything else at least the approximate size of a laptop would do as well. So are they planning to ban anything laptop-sized or larger?
On the contrary, they specifically state that they haven't been able to test it with autonomous vehicles. Yes, this will work a treat with autonomous vehicles; this sort of advantage has been foreseen as long as the consequences of autonomous vehicles has been seriously considered. But until we have 80 to 90 percent coverage with autonomous vehicles, it ain't gonna fly.
...is way to make drivers drive at the mandated speeds. Which, of course, they won't do; you only have to look at how speed limits are obeyed to know that.
The Xbox is one of their few successes at this independent of Windows
"Success" only in the sense that it wasn't an outright failure. Xbox never "took over the market" like Microsoft's more Windows-centric conquests. The Playstation 2 massively outsold the original Xbox, which only just edged out the GameCube. The Playstation 3 was neck and neck with the Xbox 360, both of which got outsold by the Wii. The Xbox One has lost decisively to the Playstation 4 and has been outsold by the Wii U.
Unless you're writing machine code, "executable" does mean "interpreted". The only way a computer can execute something that is not its own machine code is to interpret it. If you can type a high-level program into a computer and have it run in an unchanged form, then the computer must be interpreting it.
I think for purpose of this argument, most people would be willing to consider the preprocessor as part of the compiler. It's not like you would consider writing and compiling C code without it, except in very exceptional circumstances.
No. The weasel word there is "high-level". "High-level" by definition is at least 3rd generation, because that's when the concept of a high-level languages was developed. 1st generation was machine code, and 2nd generation was assembler. FORTRAN was the first of the 3rd generation languages.
The upshot is you are sending data that can be interpreted by a machine that is totally under the recipient's control. Expecting to be able to keep access to that data restricted for the recipient is foolish at best. There is no way to secure it, I don't care what your API does. You can't encrypt against access if you're going to giving away the keys.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, it's 12345.
Because I still use Firefox.
But how do you get NT to run on an Apple?
The internet (which is not the web, the web is built on top of the internet) *is* "decentralized". It was built that way.
Where can i haz this Shodan-"Program"??
Not only would a laptop packed with explosives still bring down a plane while in the cargo hold, but anything else at least the approximate size of a laptop would do as well. So are they planning to ban anything laptop-sized or larger?
On the contrary, they specifically state that they haven't been able to test it with autonomous vehicles. Yes, this will work a treat with autonomous vehicles; this sort of advantage has been foreseen as long as the consequences of autonomous vehicles has been seriously considered. But until we have 80 to 90 percent coverage with autonomous vehicles, it ain't gonna fly.
...is way to make drivers drive at the mandated speeds. Which, of course, they won't do; you only have to look at how speed limits are obeyed to know that.
We want to be in a walled garden, as long as it's a good walled garden. No thank you.
The point is, that wasn't specified, but infinite speed was. So sacrificing memory to gain speed makes no sense.
So why did Mr. Edison decide to hire you?
Scott Bakula could not be reached for comment.
"Success" only in the sense that it wasn't an outright failure. Xbox never "took over the market" like Microsoft's more Windows-centric conquests. The Playstation 2 massively outsold the original Xbox, which only just edged out the GameCube. The Playstation 3 was neck and neck with the Xbox 360, both of which got outsold by the Wii. The Xbox One has lost decisively to the Playstation 4 and has been outsold by the Wii U.
"Natively". You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
...is to severely lock down what they can do!
There won't be any. Because those things don't exist. That's what the Memory Hole is for.
They didn't need computers either. So obviously you should stop using yours.
1.21 Gigawatts should be enough for anybody!
Unless you're writing machine code, "executable" does mean "interpreted". The only way a computer can execute something that is not its own machine code is to interpret it. If you can type a high-level program into a computer and have it run in an unchanged form, then the computer must be interpreting it.
I think for purpose of this argument, most people would be willing to consider the preprocessor as part of the compiler. It's not like you would consider writing and compiling C code without it, except in very exceptional circumstances.
Octal is for people who don't have sixteen fingers.
No. The weasel word there is "high-level". "High-level" by definition is at least 3rd generation, because that's when the concept of a high-level languages was developed. 1st generation was machine code, and 2nd generation was assembler. FORTRAN was the first of the 3rd generation languages.
Was it ever alive?
The upshot is you are sending data that can be interpreted by a machine that is totally under the recipient's control. Expecting to be able to keep access to that data restricted for the recipient is foolish at best. There is no way to secure it, I don't care what your API does. You can't encrypt against access if you're going to giving away the keys.
Putting photos out where anybody can see them means putting photos out where anybody can see them.