Slashdot Mirror


Neowin: Microsoft's Windows Phone Business 'Is Dead' (neowin.net)

An anonymous reader quotes Neowin: If you've been expecting Microsoft to issue a press release formally announcing the end of its Windows phone business, you're probably hoping for a bit too much. But make no mistake: its phone hardware business is dead. RIP-dead. Send-flowers-dead. Worm-food-dead. Some fans, and even some in the media, have consistently refused to acknowledge this, despite the clear signs in recent quarters. Now, Microsoft's own figures, and its statements regarding its phone division, should make it irrefutably clear that there is no life left in its Windows phone business.

During the quarter ending in December, Microsoft's phone revenue dropped to just $200 million, which included some sales of feature phones, before the company completed its sale of that business unit to Foxconn in November. That figure has now dropped to virtually nothing... Today, as Microsoft published its earnings report for Q3 FY2017, it revealed that its "Phone revenue declined $730 million". Based on its earlier financial disclosures, that means the company's phone hardware revenue fell to just $5 million for the entire quarter ending March 31, 2017. During Microsoft's earnings call today, its chief financial officer, Amy Hood, acknowledged this, stating that there was "no material phone revenue this quarter". The outlook for the next few months is similarly bleak, as Hood predicted "negligible revenue from Phone" in the coming quarter.

180 comments

  1. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft could realize that iOS is starting to suck and some people dont like Android. Make a nice phone with all the good points of the others, security, good camera, an analogue audio jack, music/podcast player that rocks, and runs full Office, and AD/Exchange tools? I think they could take a chunk of the market very easily so long as it was a slow POS. Forget the Surface that is both an average tablet and a bad laptop, we want phones that do everything, and everything well. iOS used to have that crown.

    iOS 10 blows chunks on an iPhone 6 even, its slow and the UI changes seem to be for the sake of change vs an actual improvement over iOS 9!

    Android compared to iOS still seems clunky, unfinished and illogically organized/confusing, and apps want to access everything, why does a calculator need to access my SMS or addressbook? Its all or nothing the last time I checked, iOS at least makes it easy to turn off/on what apps can access.

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *** wasn't a slow POS

    2. Re:Really? by Tuidjy · · Score: 2

      I'm replying to the post above because for some reason I cannot just 'Post'.

      I have to admit, this makes me sad. I love my Windows Phone, because it is the easiest to program and configure of all the phones in my household (I have an Android for business, my wife has an iPhone from work, and we both have WIndows Phones for personal use)

      I find the iPhone and Android very unfriendly unless reconfigured from the ground up. The Windows Phone leaves you the illusion you own it. It is an illusion, it still does things without asking, but I feel that I can disable the things I do not want... except for the bloody updates.

      On my Android, I always have shit that I did not put there, and I have to figure out how to disable...

      Now I am going to actually have to go and educate myself in the search of a new hardware that I will have to configure to my liking. The Nook is my favorite tablet... so I guess I will have to look for an Android that can be gracefully opened/jailbroken/whatever the kids call it nowadays.

      And yes, I know I am a dinosaur for sticking with Windows Phone. It's just that I had so much C# software to talk to the CNC machines at work, the servers, the UPSs, the robot cells and the boxline... and even my cars.

      I even managed to learn to like the bloody tiles.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    3. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Just b'cos Microsoft has stopped selling them doesn't mean your phones will stop working. If you and your wife like your Windows phones, why're you looking for new hardware? Just stay w/ this one until it dies. I too have all 3 types of phone, and while I use my iPhone due to FaceTime, I do prefer my Lumia 550 over my Moto-X.

    4. Re:Really? by localman · · Score: 1

      Totally agree - this is sad. I am primarily an iPhone user, and have experience with Android tablets, but I had to use the Windows phone for a while and I ended up liking it better than either. The UI is far less intrusive and needlessly complicated: it just works, to coin a phrase. When my Dad wanted a smartphone, despite his fears of being overwhelmed, I got him a Windows Phone and he had no problems at all. Even he was surprised at how easy it was to use. It was easier than the Jitterbug he replaced. Yet as a power user I didn't come across anything I couldn't do - and do easier - than on my iPhone.

      I think the tiles setup allows *much* better customization than the wall of icons approach that both Apple and Google went with.

      Seems like an example of the market not rewarding a good product, I guess.

    5. Re:Really? by darkain · · Score: 1

      Under Gates or possibly even Ballmer, this could have been a reality. They both cared about businesses and to a degree consumers, too. This is why there was such an emphasis on usability in Windows until recently. Nedalla cares about one thing and one thing only: subscription services. If it isn't this, he doesn't give too fucks about it. And this totally makes sense, too, he comes from Microsoft's Azure Cloud as a background. Gates was all about being a cutthroat business man, so this is the type of people he catered to when pushing the company agenda. And well, Ballmer, we all know the DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS speech.

    6. Re:Really? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I just had this vision of Monty Python's Dead Parrot.

    7. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows and security in the sentence? Surely you jest...

    8. Re:Really? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Which is kind of ironic as that's exactly how the computer OS situation worked out. Windows was the shittiest OS but ended up owning the market much like Android does for phones. Apple is on the sideline in both situations providing an alternative at a premium price.

    9. Re:Really? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I just had this vision of Monty Python's Dead Parrot.

      Gee, Wally, I just had this vision that Windows Phone burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    10. Re:Really? by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      My wife is using my old (first) Windows Phone. Our daughter just impacted the volume control last week... which was the first physical damage, but won't be the last. My own phone is more than two years old.

      Between my first comment and this one, I have been browsing the new Lumias... but I know that at some point, I may want newer technology, if only for processor power.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    11. Re:Really? by fizzer06 · · Score: 1

      The Windows Mobile phones were great for the first few years (before the iPhone) and showed great promise. MS must have invested a ton of loot into the project, just to let it die this slow death.

    12. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumers don't drive the market, aftersellers and the phone companies do.

    13. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Windows CE was pure garbage that constantly locked and would not ring when a call arrived.

      Then again .... Windows CE was more stable than Android is today.

    14. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any phone you can't prevent from shutting itself down and applying updates is a phone you don't own. The best you could do is schedule no less than 6 hours where the phone could make itself unavailable for up to 20 minutes at a time. If you see the update come I understand in your can put it off for some hours, but if you don't catch it in time, tough. Totally unusable as a 24 hr on call support phone. I consider my lower end Windows phones to be toys.

    15. Re: Really? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      You obviously never tried to develop for Windows Phone. I tried on a 6.1 and it had a kiloton of unimplemented api calls.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    16. Re:Really? by DaHat · · Score: 2

      Just b'cos Microsoft has stopped selling them doesn't mean your phones will stop working

      But it does mean that existing bugs won't be getting fixed, nor will there be much needed improvements.

      I'd been a happy Windows Phone user since it first came to Verizon back in 2011. Eventually I got a better carrier (just to be able to stick with the platform), but eventually even I had to relent and go Android just a couple of months ago as it was abundantly clear that the even my 950 XL was suffering some some of the same SW issues that my previously upgraded Lumia Icon had... none of which were getting fixed.

    17. Re:Really? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate Microsoft as a company, having Google and Apple control everything is also problematic. Thus, it would indeed be nice if MS gave them decent competition.

    18. Re:Really? by drewsup · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wait... your Windows phone gets updates??!!!
      Wow, you are the lucky one then, because my my Lumia 625 and 635 were promised Win 10,(along with 78% of the MS phone market), then left to die alone in the digital wilderness, like ALL MS hardware eventually does. So Skype,Messenger, and Whatsapp are all unsupported now, in fact, even with the latest FB update, you get stuck in the loop, where if someone messages you, the screen asks to download Messenger, which you cant, they couldnt even roll it back to letting FB receive/reply PM'S,even thought the icon is still there.
      No MS, you lost because your place in the phone arena because you ABANDONED it, it was a TOY to you, Like your first Surface was, Like the Zune was,like...well, ANYTHING not PC related.

    19. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I went exactly the opposite way last year. The 950XL and Windows 10 Mobile in general is a welcome improvement over my old Galaxy S3 and its poorly-supported Android version. Screw that. If you can't be bothered to update the OS and keep drivers around for previously-capable hardware, then I'm out. Fuck that shit. Let the chips fall where they may. It's not like that S3 wasn't bogging down like a piece of shit already without upgrades when I replaced it. And if that "flagship" can't last the duration of a contract, I'll be damned if I'm wasting my money on a new one.

      At least Apple keeps things alive for a few generations... for now. Meanwhile, my 950XL got the "creators update" or whatever the new WinMo update is called a few days ago. And that was after they announced that their WinMo revenues were essentially zero.

      I should scrounge as many 950XL's as I can find so I can keep running WinMo now that they've discontinued all their hardware. (I'm sure-as-shit not buying a Blu.) Chalk me up as "not going back to Android or Apple". I'll buy cheap flip phones before I go back to either of those jokers.

    20. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it does mean that existing bugs won't be getting fixed

      That's not exactly different from what we're used to expect from Microsoft.

      If Microsoft were in the bug fixing business, they would still be fixing bugs in Windows ME.

    21. Re:Really? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To be fair the first Surface was a toy to everyone with a toy OS even less useful than Windows 10 mobile.

    22. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem delusional.
      I haven't touched an iPhone in a long while, but if the inaccurate things you say about Android are a guide, you must simply be one of those oddball Microsoft fanboys.
      I know it's hard for you to comprehend, but people really don't want to run Office on their phone. They bought their phone themselves and they want to use it to do thing like play mindless games and hit up friends on social media - they don't want to type up documents on a 5.5" touch screen.

    23. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, what were you thinking buying a windows phone?

    24. Re:Really? by bongey · · Score: 1

      Microsoft fanboy detected, the single Windows Phone user that still thinks it's great.

    25. Re:Really? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are the lucky one then, because my my Lumia 625 and 635 were promised Win 10,(along with 78% of the MS phone market), then left to die alone in the digital wilderness

      Same thing happened to my sony xperia play, same thing happened to my moto g 2nd. In both cases the community stepped up and provided something but the vendor? nope nope. Anyone who gets updates (which don't render the device a total turd) is lucky.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Really? by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      It's Irony princess, I didn't mean to offend your transgenderness.

    27. Re:Really? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      That's in USA.

      In a lot of countries, phone companies don't even sell phones. They sell only SIM cards.

    28. Re: Really? by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      From my experience the windows phones have longer battery life than android devices, they are just more efficient. I would keep my old windows phone just for that. What sucks though is the browser. For example it regularly messes up displaying Facebook, showing it shifted to the side, so you can't see things. And it does not display CNN at all. Well, I guess websites also just don't get tested on this browser.

    29. Re:Really? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is that you? Ah the Betamax argument. Numbers tell a different story. NOBODY IS BUYING WINDOWS PHONE. It's dead. Get over it.

    30. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your comments you clearly used Android for the last time quite long ago (or didn't know how to use it). Comparing iOS 10 to Nougat I don't see anyone winning on clunkyness or organization or logic.

      Microsoft would stand a chance if their OS just didn't suck completely.

    31. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Android isn't stable for you it probably is due to shitty hardware/brand. Stop being a cheapskate and buy a proper phone.

    32. Re:Really? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Even my old Nokia N900 still gets updates, some community updates turned up over the weekend according to the notification icon. That's despite Nokia being drained of blood and staked through the heart.
      MS is just "special" - locking anyone else out who would be capable of doing updates and then abandoning a product which is not even old enough to need a new battery.
      It happens on PCs as well like those folks with TV tuner cards that suddenly found them unsupported in Win10 media player.

    33. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When given a choice most people will not choose Windows. In the PC market people are choosing PC (not Windows) over a Mac.

    34. Re:Really? by johanw · · Score: 1

      Forced updates and AD stuff is only wanted by MS-indoctrinated sysadmins. That group is too small to make it profitable.

    35. Re:Really? by johanw · · Score: 1

      If noone makes windows phones anymore they will be dead over 3-4 years, when most units will have physically died.

    36. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can take a small amount of solace in the fact that you aren't alone. There are literally dozens of you.

      J/K

      Apparently there's not even a dozen.

    37. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you on drugs?

    38. Re:Really? by johanw · · Score: 1

      If you want a phone without a company controlling it, either flash an open soure ROM or root your android and kill the Google analytics and adservices.

    39. Re:Really? by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Even though I preferred the openness of Android, I always secretly admired Microsoft's mobile UI. The tiles concept seemed very well-done.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    40. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No MS, you lost because your place in the phone arena because you ABANDONED it, it was a TOY to you, Like your first Surface was, Like the Zune was,like...well, ANYTHING not PC related

      They didn't abandon it. They got serious about being in the game WAY TOO LATE. This is what would have allowed them to be one of 3:
      - Have a serious OS out of the gate. The first few version of Windows Mobile were garbage
      - Be serious about providing free tools to developers. It took too long to get on the developers side and to provide uniform tools that could work across platform. VS2015 was the first serious attempt in my opinion
      - Get the stores working with them, not against. Every cell phone store I went to said it was garbage. They couldn't tell me why or their reasons were dated issues that had long been resolved. Yet they would be happy to sell you a $100 Android phone that was underspeced to do any day to day tasks and entertainment.

      The end result for me was to move to Android which I was already very familiar with and do enjoy. However, it will never beat the better visual organization the tiles provided but compensates with a much better notification delivery system.

    41. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, found the loser who travels the world by reading random nonsense online. no fucktard. there are pretty much no countries where phone companies aren't selling you phones. as a plane-based 2k+ lifetime flights, speak 5 languages world traveler - I can't name a single one. you're a moron. don't spew garbage you know nothing about. stick to talking about where to watch good porn and what socks hold cum w/o leaking.

    42. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Wait... your Windows phone gets updates??!!! Wow, you are the lucky one then, because my my Lumia 625 and 635 were promised Win 10,(along with 78% of the MS phone market), then left to die alone in the digital wilderness, like ALL MS hardware eventually does. So Skype,Messenger, and Whatsapp are all unsupported now, in fact, even with the latest FB update, you get stuck in the loop, where if someone messages you, the screen asks to download Messenger, which you cant, they couldnt even roll it back to letting FB receive/reply PM'S,even thought the icon is still there.

      I'll grant you that the initial Windows Phones - 8 & 8.1 - didn't get updates on their own, since those were tied to the carrier. Like when I had an Icon, I never got an update for that b'cos Verizon never released one: it took them forever to test the thing.

      Microsoft changed things in Windows 10, where they made the updates automatic. Like on my Lumia 550, everytime I've had a major Windows update on my laptop, I've had one on that phone. It may change going forward in Redstone, but as long as the basic things that I do on that phone ain't sabotaged, I am happy. I've never used Skype or FB Messenger, but WhatsApp works fine. In fact, I think the issue you have is that WhatsApp eliminated some older OSs from its support, such as Windows Phone 8. 10 and 8.1 (I believe re: the latter) are still supported.

    43. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Actually, w/ the Windows 8 & 8.1 phones, Microsoft did leave it up to the carriers to provide their updates, which turned out to be a fiasco, particularly w/ Verizon. Now, Microsoft provides all the updates in Windows 10 Mobile, and those come at the same time as the desktop updates. Microsoft did the right thing here in following Apple's example, and even Google's gotten the hint, since every phone that has Lollipop and beyond is upgradable. Good luck doing that w/ Gingerbread, Ice Cream sandwich or Kitkat

    44. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      There were at least 3 on this page, by my count.

    45. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I never owned a Windows phone until Nokia adapted that platform w/ version 8. From what I heard, the CE based ones were crap. The first Windows phone I had was a Lumia 520 - their entry level - and it was a breeze, going from a flip phone Moto RAZR. Until then, I never used to text, but once I had this, texting was a breeze. As was HERE maps, OneNote and a host of other features.

      In fact, at the time, Windows 8 had the best phone typing platform: Android and iOS have since caught up. But at the time, if you typed, you'd see suggested words on the top, which you could ignore. That was way better than the Symbian word-guessing that Nokia phones tried to do while one painstakingly used the numeric keypad to type out words. One had to know where to find the option of disabling the dictionary.

      Also, as an aside, the touch sensitivity of the Lumias were unmatched by anything else I've had.

    46. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      As someone else who's travelled, it's nothing like the US. There, phone companies sell you a SIM, and as for the phone, it's up to you whether you wanna buy one from them, or provide your own. Also, the system of getting a 'free' phone w/ a 2 year contract doesn't exist: you simply buy the phone at cost upfront, and then put in the SIM of your choice. Of course, that's due to all of them being GSM standards: not sure what the practice is in Japan or Korea.

    47. Re:Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      And if you want to stop making Tysons rich, start your own chicken farm

    48. Re: Really? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Are you talking Edge for Windows 10 Mobile, or Internet Explorer for Windows Phone 8?

    49. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under Gates, any Windows Phone OEM would be strong armed (not the CPU!) into paying for a Windows Phone license no matter what they shipped, be it Android, Sailfish, Symbian, whatever.

      Under Balmer, he'd just fucking kill Android and iOS by throwing office furniture at them.

    50. Re:Really? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Microsoft failed because they tried to make a platform that had all of the weaknesses of iOS and Android, with none of the strengths of either:

      - Whitelist only app publishing model
      - "Live tiles" that aren't actually live, and compared to Android's widget system are just big icons that change at an interval that neither the developer nor the end user can control.
      - Demanded ridiculous prices for app development and publishing (until only very recently)
      - Not once, or twice, but THREE times changed the app framework in such a way that broke compatibility. Windows phone evangelists loved talking up a storm about Android fragmentation, but at least Android apps work across different major versions of the OS.
      - Not once, or twice, but THREE times broke OS compatibility across devices, and they knew before they even released WP7 that they'd be doing this (technically speaking, there's no real reason WP7 devices couldn't run WP8 so long as new drivers would have been provided by Microsoft, and the filesystem converted to NTFS. The argument of "it's a different kernel" is not a valid one in this regard, rather it's just a combination of trying to rush to market with what they had at the time, and then cheaping out on upgrades.)

      And if all of that isn't enough, they created a weak ass API framework that isn't actually capable of doing anything interesting.

      Its all or nothing the last time I checked, iOS at least makes it easy to turn off/on what apps can access.

      Android 6 and up essentially disables permissions by default, and you have to grant the app access to different things as it needs them, and you can always decline any particular permission. Even Google's built in apps are subject to this (for example, Google Maps requests permission to access GPS, which you can either allow or deny.)

      There's still an app manifest, so you'll see the permissions needed when the app installs, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the app will actually be able to do those things.

    51. Re:Really? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      and even Google's gotten the hint, since every phone that has Lollipop and beyond is upgradable

      It's not up to Google, it's up to the handset OEM. That said, I especially doubt most of them will actually provide timely updates.

  2. But has Netcraft confirmed it? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    [nt]

    1. Re:But has Netcraft confirmed it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I won't believe it until Netcraft confirms it. Red ink flows like a river of blood, etc.

    2. Re:But has Netcraft confirmed it? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Minecraft confirms it. They're blocking out the mass burial grave site even as we speak.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  3. Not pining for the fjords dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is the tech world coming to if we lose our grip with Monty Python?

    1. Re:Not pining for the fjords dead? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Oh what sad times are these when passing ruffians can say "Ni" at will to old ladies.

  4. So all Lumias will stop working? by unixisc · · Score: 3

    If one has a Lumia, then one can still use it in the ways that one uses a cellphone. Talk, send text messages, use Bing maps for directions, listen to music, watch videos... I don't see any of that stopping. Is there an en masse migration of services to VoLTE-only that would make a Lumia unusable? So that it couldn't be used for Legacy GSM networks?

    I agree that the Windows Phone platform has been stagnant, but that only matters if one is heavily into apps and is seeing them pulled from the Windows Store. But for the basic things that a phone does, Windows Phone is still fine. While there were complaints about the original tiles in Windows Phone 8, the look & feel of Windows 10 Mobile has been pretty fluent, and the only thing it lacks is a good app ecosystem. Heck, I'd argue that it's the best in work environments if Windows is the main OS being used - both for servers as well as laptops

    1. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by quetwo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It won't stop working today, but quickly things will become deprecated and unusable. Things like the web browser will stop rendering pages correctly as standards move on. Things like the app stores will start blocking the device. Things like Bing Maps and other utilities that are tied to the device will stop supporting it. Eventually other APIs will move on and no longer work with the device (like ActiveSync). Of course, somewhere in between IT departments will block it form checking email and syncing calendars/contacts. If Blackberries are of any predictor, this could happen all in the course of a couple of years. You will be left with a smart phone that can do phone calls and text messages.

    2. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one has a Lumia, then one can still use it in the ways that one uses a cellphone.

      You can still ride a horse to work, you can still put whale oil in a lamp and light it, you can use a flint and steel to start a fire, I don't see any of that stopping.

    3. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by skirmish666 · · Score: 1

      If one has a Lumia, then one can still use it in the ways that one uses a cellphone. Talk, send text messages, use Bing maps for directions, listen to music, watch videos... I don't see any of that stopping. Is there an en masse migration of services to VoLTE-only that would make a Lumia unusable? So that it couldn't be used for Legacy GSM networks?

      The heading and summary use the word "Business" several times. I don't feel that anything more than the end of the phone hardware business was implied?

      --
      Sigger than your average
    4. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that? It costs them virtually nothing to simply leave it running and continue to get the business of the users that are left, ditto for the apps that are already on there as lets face it many of the "apps" today are just glorified screen scrapers or simple data processing (such as the Weather.com app which is just grabbing the data and ads from the website) so as long as there are still even a couple hundred thousand users out there using it? its still gonna be profitable with as little as they have to support it.

      And considering many places are selling Lumiz 640s for $40 which takes great pictures, gets really great battery life, has a nice clear screen and plays vids well? I can see those being hung onto for awhile. Finally look at how long MSFT has supported their failed OSes, Vista anyone? and it costs a hell of a lot more to support a full desktop OS like Vista than a lightweight version of win 10 which they are supporting anyway. So unless some major malware comes out for it (doubtful as malware writers go to where the most users are so Win10 Mobile is probably the most secure mobile OS there is right now) I wouldn't be surprised if MSFT just left things as they are until the users drop so small there won't be anyone left to care.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If one has a Lumia, then one can still use it in the ways that one uses a cellphone. Talk, send text messages, use Bing maps for directions, listen to music, watch videos... I don't see any of that stopping.

      A +5 comment above yours shows exactly why that will stop working. Much of the world depends on the latest shiny. Your OS will rot, your apps will update ... right until they don't. When they don't update you'll no longer be able to send text messages or talk (e.g. Facebook Messenger app which depends on Windows 10 and won't work if its out of date).

      Maybe your browser will keep working. Maybe a POODLE style vulnerability is detected and the internet stops serving you sites like they did for IE6 or Android 2.3. Maybe MS will shutdown their maps service and you won't have an alternative because Google et al aren't writing apps for your phone. You'll probably still be able to listen to music and videos though, at least until another hairbrained DRM scheme kicks in.

      I remember an update introducing a bug in the Galaxy S5 series which disabled the ANT+ modem. Samsung wasn't interested in fixing it as they were too busy getting ready to support the latest and greatest other phones. So my stagnant platform received a security fix which introduced a bug that removed functionality I was using. (Side note: out of no where they fixed the bug a year later to my surprise, but I'd already given up on it).

      Abandoned projects rot. It may be working today, but that's no guarantee that your device will still have the full feature set it came with.

    6. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that? It costs them virtually nothing to simply leave it running and continue to get the business of the users that are left,

      They shut down the old thing to induce users to buy the new thing. Microsoft, Google, whoever.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that? I[...] its still gonna be profitable with as little as they have to support it.

      Except... if there's a security breach that affects a lot of devices at a time when MS has already turned those development/maintenance teams into a skeleton crew, or those people already decided that working in legacy tech is not as interesting as everyone else's job at Microsoft and elsewhere.

      MS should definitely keep support alive for x years after the last device they put on sale, and hope that x+1 years from now buyers have moved on rather than complain about lack of service.

      As the eternal optimist Nokia Lumia 925 owner, I think that the plan here is to let the share go down to near zero and then when the new Zune-mobile product line is launched they'll have awesome growth figures to show :)

    8. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      They'd do that if there's something new that they were introducing. Like forcing Windows 7 or 8 users to go to Windows 10. But it's not the case here, where they don't have a succession product. Which is why what Hairyfeet says makes sense: they can just leave it alone and let current Lumia owners continue to use the store to get whatever they want. Other vendors might pull dated stuff from the store, but Microsoft needn't.

    9. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Not the same thing. The same thing would be using the old Nokia chocolate bars or Mot RAZRs instead of any smartphone

    10. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I agree that the Windows Phone platform has been stagnant"
      So pining for the fiords type stagnant?

    11. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, you posed a really stupid question. How are goods already sold part of the prediction of how a business will fare?

      Windows phones fail to deliver on the basic needs. They crash and lose reception. Speech quality is on par with the cheapest kind of android phones.

      There are only 2 nice things i can say about my Windows Phone and the previous ones, i had - a) Battery Life is really good b) at least they don't run iOS

    12. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Exactly all the Lumia owners are still generating revenue through ads and it costs virtually nothing to just leave the storefront up, what with MSFT owning the servers, so why would they take it down? Hell they still have patches and pages up for Win98SE if you know where to look simply because it costs nothing to host a couple Mb worth of files on a server.

      And I think Lumia owners won't be losing anymore third party apps either because the ones that require updates? Have already been dropped. Your banking apps and other apps that require constant security updates are already gone so what you have left is screen scrapers like the weather apps and games...again none of these really need any support and they generate revenue from ads so what would be the point in pulling them?

      So I'd say Lumia owners have at least 2-3 years left if MSFT comes out with something new, if they don't? Well I've downloaded Win2K patches from MSFT in 2012 so as long as they are getting some revenue from the remaining owners they have no reason to pull the plug.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Uh, I did a search in the Windows Store of my Lumia for Wells Fargo, and it listed the app. Nowhere near gone. If people haven't stopped using their phones, why would even banks delete them?

    14. Re:So all Lumias will stop working? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Well TBF a lot of other banking apps have been pulled, the AE BlueBird app for just one instance. If your bank still supports WinPhone? Great, but a lot of banks don't anymore. As for why? Because it costs money to patch the WinPhone apps and update them to the latest protocols and with so few users per bank (you have to figure you have maybe 5% of WinPhone users that use a particular bank) so that really isn't a bunch of users for the amount of work.

      But for the general apps? They can be used by a lot more users and costs nothing to just leave where they are, no point in pulling them.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  5. hey why not push htephone OS onto desktop users!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets push a stupid retarded dead phone operating system onto ....THE DESKTOP USERRSSSSSSSSS

    oh wait failllll lets screw them by forcing it and then making them pay monthly for this ...hahaha

    whose ever in charge thelast few years FIRE THE WANKER.

    and your detection of humans is lacking ....hte line over it made it look like it might be HUMBLING

    rather it was Humbing

  6. It was born dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows phone was born dead...with any M$ OS on it, it was destined to fail from the start! Like the Zune, it never had the slightest chance at all!

    1. Re:It was born dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. In fact the only really successful Microsoft products were originally created over 30 years ago. And the only reason Office and Windows make money is corporations can't seem to get rid of them.

  7. Just an opinion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only FACT in this story is Amy Hood's comment regarding WP revenues. Everything else is speculation and opinion.

    This is nearly identical to the story that was posted here a few weeks ago declaring Windows Phone is "Officially Dead". Only Microsoft can make such a claim and they haven't to date.

    I happen to agree with the author's assessment, but I don't like an opinion piece being disguised as a news report. As a loyal WP user, I won't be buying any new ones until I see more commitment from the company.

    1. Re:Just an opinion! by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Microsoft have a big event on Tuesday.

      Mega lols if they release a new phone, along with a Surface Pro 5.

    2. Re:Just an opinion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Non of the big phone sellers in my country sell Windows Phones anymore. They were pretty angry when Microsoft's flagship phone was sold for 750 euro when it finally arrived in our country only to see it appear in a low cost supermarket for only 199 euro 5 weeks later. They were still selling their phone for 750 euro while they were dumped in the supermarket. How do you explain your customers that you ripped them off, even when it is not your fault?
       
      I've read that these phone sellers couldn't even turn the phones back to Microsoft. They had to sell them with a loss to get rid of them.

  8. It's Dead, Throw It Out The Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let the Dephonestration begin!

  9. How to build a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headphone jack !!

    SD card slot

    NFC

    FOSS OS

    Removable battery

    Extended battery available

    Dual SIM

    Full disk encryption

    Stingray detection

    Camera with LED flash

    Matte screen

    1. Re:How to build a phone by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Here you go. Build it yourself.

      https://learn.adafruit.com/pip...

    2. Re:How to build a phone by amiga3D · · Score: 1
    3. Re:How to build a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Headphone jack !!
      SD card slot
      NFC
      FOSS OS
      Removable battery
      Extended battery available
      Dual SIM
      Full disk encryption
      Stingray detection
      Camera with LED flash
      Matte screen

      Yes.
      Yes.
      Yes.
      No.
      Yes.
      Yes.
      Yes.
      Yes.
      No.
      Yes.
      No.

      8/11 - Lumia 950XL, R.I.P.

      Should've bought one while you could. In the future, don't be a zealot and you might actually not miss out on something nice for a change.

    4. Re:How to build a phone by johanw · · Score: 1

      Apps: No. For Android, there are stingray detectors once you're root (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.srlabs.snoopsnitch, only if you have a Snapdragon soc).

    5. Re:How to build a phone by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Matte screen: whenever I get a phone, I buy its matte sheet protector online almost immediately and put it on. Gone are the days when I'd let the screen get scratched and smudged beyond cleaning

  10. How is this possible? Gartner said otherwise by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1, Troll

    I distinctly remember Gartner forecasting that Windows Phone would become the second most used smartphone OS, just slightly behind Android. Usually, their forecasts are super accurate even going 20 years into the future. And it was obvious at the time: Windows Phone had doubled its market share from 0.4% in 2011 to 0.8% in 2012. From this rich dataset, Gartner did they only sensible thing to produce a forecast: They assumed the same growth rate for the coming years and predicted 1.6%, 3.2%, 6.4%, 12.8% to 25.6% in 2017. Forecast for 2018 was 51.2% and for 2019 102.4%. Despite all the headlines, I think Microsoft are on track to achieve Gartner's 2019 forecast.

    1. Re:How is this possible? Gartner said otherwise by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You have to be fair to Gartner, they were not aware of Windows anal probe 10 and thus could not take it into account. Nobody likes perves, a lesson everyone except the arse holes at M$ learned in primary school, really, really uncool behaviour ask any reasonable child and they will tell you exactly that. So M$ is killing itself in the consumer market first in smart phones and now the XBone is following suit losing market share to Sony and XBone is the popular name for it, so not seen as cool what so ever. Wow it looks pretty grim for M$ https://www.statista.com/stati.... It seems like smart phones are killing game consoles, so how long before the hook up a smart phone to a big screen TV. The privacy invasiveness and arrogance is market suicide and good riddance.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  11. Obligatory Reference by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

    RIP-dead. Send-flowers-dead. Worm-food-dead.

    "It's pining!"
    "It's not pining, it's passed on! This is an Ex-Phone!"

    1. Re:Obligatory Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Bring out your dead!)
      "It's feeling a bit better!"
      (Bring out your dead!)

    2. Re:Obligatory Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's life Jim, but not as we know it."

  12. Re:Wow...What is Ballmer thinking now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably something like "I hope the basketball team I own, the Clippers, win tonight!" He is rich and you does cool stuff, you are poor and make sarcastic comments about things he said five years ago at some business meeting. What a sad, sad man you are.

  13. It was too late but not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I personally hope MS keeps it alive in some form. 2 competitors is far too few...

    1. Re:It was too late but not bad by unixisc · · Score: 1

      WebOS is alive, as a smart TV OS. It was HP that killed it on phones - by buying Palm one day and dismantling it another. Like Microsoft did w/ Nokia's.

  14. Microsoft business plan. by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Troll

    Successful phase 3. Extinguish.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  15. Neowin: The PRo MS anti slashdot admits by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use that forum too and if it says it is dead that means alot.

    I was hoping it would take around 20% marketshare just for healthy competition even if I do not use it anymore as this would benefit everyone. :-(

    It is not WindowsCE (which sucked) and was a much different and better OS. It usess the same kernel as Windows Server 2012 R2! I loved the UI. Windows 8 rocked on a phone and the back and forward feels more natural than Android. It was stable and very lightweight and ran easier on slower but battery saving cpus. The tiles give you the notifications for news events perfect at a quick glance.

    MS got it backwards with a start menu on WindowsCE and a phone UI on the desktop. Windows Phone should have come out in 2009 if it were to survive. Also WIndows Universal Apps or UWP was not mature until last year! If this was there in 2009/2010 it could have had significant marketshare and be a much needed 3rd player and kept IT and programmers jobs and not made --webkit CSS extensions standard.

    My mom who is 68 years old and has dying eye sight and is techno illerate loves her $50 Windows Phone Nokia 640 unlocked. No way could Android run as good for that cheap for $50. The big tiles make it easier for her to see and understand what each tile does.

    But it makes no sense to buy one as I did not want to invest $500 into a dead platform so I went back to Android 18 months ago. Even if Neowin of all places admits it now it is time to move forward. Ironically this is what killed Unix for Windows. People wanted standards and no one wanted to pay lots of money for Unix or a Commode as everyone was using Windows. Now MS got hit in reverse by the same logic.

    1. Re:Neowin: The PRo MS anti slashdot admits by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      And the irony is, they completely fucked over their PC GUI just to try and unify it with this mobile shit, and now the whole reason for it is basically gone. OK there's still tablets but they're nowhere near a big enough market to justify butchering the Win7 interface. Windows 10 could've been so much better.

    2. Re:Neowin: The PRo MS anti slashdot admits by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like Billy said above, they'd have done well had they come out w/ that Metro UI for phones back in Windows Phone 6 or 7, and had they come out w/ the current Windows 10 interface in Windows 8. That would have covered both touchscreens and legacy PCs

  16. Good riddance! by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As we witness the end of this sad tale, let us not forget that Microsoft tried to hijack Nokia's rabidly loyal userbase by planting one of their own as CEO and switching the company to WP, only to be universally rejected. They killed the top-selling smartphone system of the time (Symbian) and the new system that everyone was hyped for (MeeGo), all to peddle a late, rushed, still unfinished piece of crap that no one wanted.

    So, good fucking riddance to stillborn WP, the mobile equivalent of "this is why we can't have nice things" (and by "nice things" I mean MeeGo).

    1. Re:Good riddance! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MeeGo would have failed too.

      This is the mobile equivalent of the mid 1990s. Unix dying, commodore dead, Apple II dead, Apple dying, OS/2 dying. Windows was the answer and won. Companies only wrote software for Windows as it was the winner because consumers only wanted what companies wrote software for in a cycle. Why blow $2000 on a dead platform when Windows was what everyone was using and was a sure bet etc.

      Funny thing is same is killing WIndows Phone in reverse. Meego was too late. If you were not in by 2009 you were out. 2010/2011 is when mobile developers hit apps on smartphones and consumers knew if they wanted apps they had to make a choice. Apple or Google. MeeGo didn't ahve a playstore and was expected to have mobile carriers be the appstore. Remember the shitty $3.00 midi file ring tones back then? Vommit. Apple gave the carrier the finger. Google followed and rest is history.

      WebOS was pretty cool too and so was QNX by Blackberry. All failed as people wanted companeis to set the standards like what MS did on the desktop.

      I think in 2017 it is done. Move on. Even Steve Jobs admitted Windows won which is why he refused to hire corporate account executives. Same is true here. UWP apis came 8 years too late. Meego never caught on and was a late commer.

    2. Re:Good riddance! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      This is the mobile equivalent of the mid 1990s. Unix dying, commodore dead, Apple II dead, Apple dying, OS/2 dying. Windows was the answer and won.

      Then Linux showed up and now rules everything that is not a desktop. And the Mac is still selling pretty well too.

      MeeGo didn't ahve a playstore

      It sure did, never heard of the Ovi Store?

    3. Re:Good riddance! by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      If by "rules" you mean "got a EEE pulled on them by a megacorp that turned Linux into a proprietary OS they control by cutting off support for ASOP, locking crucial APIs behind a playwall, and making GPL V3 verbotten because they can't pull a TiVo with it?" then yeah I suppose it "won" but if that is "winning" I'd sure as fuck hate to see what you would consider a loss.,/p>

      Lets see if Android behaves anything like actual Linux, shall we? So you can just replace Android with any old vanilla ARM Linux build, right? Nope and in fact with each passing quarter less and less phones are able to be "rooted" (which is and of itself an insult to Linux, as having to jailbreak your own hardware is the exact opposite of open) unless you use malware like Kingoroot. You can fix it yourself, right? Nope the drivers are all black boxed and again your changes to the Android source certainly isn't gonna run on that phone you pick up in Walmart. How about the community controlling the direction of the OS, where any coder can supply changes for consideration and possibly get them integrated upstream? Bwa ha ha ha ha...not a chance in hell, Google has exactly zero fuck to give about your code or that of the community, especially since it'll probably be GPL V3 which again is verbotten precisely because they can't TiVo it.

      Yeah you "won" alright, you won about as much as that Rube trying to beat the hustler playing third card monty in Times Square. Lets face it you got scammed, had, ripped off, and the truly sad part? You are actually cheering for the guy that fucked you! But don't take MY word for it, lets see what RMS and the FSF has to say...yeah not so good, unless you want to run one of only 2 now out of date phones, otherwise you might as well just be on iOS....yeah you "won" there sparky, you are just full of "win".

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Good riddance! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      RMS of course would say this is why we call it GNU/Linux, not Linux :-)

      Meego was Linux based but in the end the apps is why Windows is on the PC and Android on the phone. When I dropped my Nokia 830 I decided to go back to a crappy Android. Why? I do not want to invest money in a dead platform.

      My mother has a unlocked $45 Nokia 640 which is great for her 68 year old eyes with the big tiles and ease of use. Outside of a simple feature phone it is useless these days as I remember using IE mobile to make up for the lack of apps.

      Windows Phone like Meego died because it was too little too late and the damage done from the WindowsCE brandname. People asssume here it must suck because it is Microsoft without trying or they had a Compaq Ipaq and remembered calandar synchronizations, missed alarms, dropped calls, and a tiny start menu on a 4 inch inch screen and a crippled OS.

      Sure Linux you laugh as not being usable but the real reason is peoiple do not care about Windows anymore since Windows95 came out. They turn on their PC to do spreadsheets and type things for the boss. That is it. Linux has no apps outside of a server room.

      I laughed at mobile development and was shocked people didn't care about bought these locked down devices?? But that is reality. May Windows Phone rest in peace and let it see Blackberry, OS/2, and Palm Pilot waiting for it on the otherside at the light at the end of the tunnel. $500,000 in sales is quite the drop from tens of millions.

    5. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MeeGo would have failed too.

      I don't think so. Android wasn't the clear winner at that time. In fact Symbian was the smartphone OS with the largest market share and fastest growing in absolute numbers. Nokia's smartphone business was also highly profitable at that time. And in this situation, Meego was planned to be the successor of Symbian with a credible transition plan (Qt). Finally, the Meego-based N9 turned out to be really great (even beating the ipad in a prestigious user-interface design competition). And yes, there was an app store with many important Apps already there. Considering all this, I think MeeGo would not have failed.

    6. Re:Good riddance! by mikael · · Score: 1

      Back in 1995, Microsoft had just brought out Windows NT with OpenGL support. UNIX Workstation application vendors could really only afford support development on two or three OS's due to the fact that they had to pay per component for the hardware, the OS, the compilers and documentation, the API dev kits like X-windows/Motif, the number of users, the number of CPU's, separate graphics boards and UNIX priced monitors and cables. Alternatively, they could just buy Windows NT with everything ready to go. Companies like HP, DEC, Digital all caved in. Sun held out with Solaris. Once consumer 3D graphics accelerator boards came out in 2000, Linux really took off, since Microsoft kept insisting that OpenGL was legacy and DirectX was the future for consumer devices.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Good riddance! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      MeeGo would have failed too.

      Why? It was a lot like Android at the same time only faster on the same hardware. It even had Angry Birds and was on the radar of other major application vendors.
      By your argument above Android should be dead as well, so what additional reason do you have for MeeGo to die other than Elop killing it and telling Intel and the other partners to fuck off?

    8. Re:Good riddance! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      MeeGo didn't ahve a playstore

      Wrong. It was called "ovi store".

    9. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, nobody was hyped for MeeGo.

    10. Re:Good riddance! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Meego is there as Jolla's Sailfish - why is that not catching fire if it's so great?

    11. Re:Good riddance! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Too bad Microsoft didn't create a common NT development platform across the CPUs that it supported - Alpha and MIPS, in addition to x86. Had they done that, devs could have developed their stuff on Alphas and had awesome results

    12. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of revisionism around this whole episode, but one important point to remember: Symbian was dying, if not dead, before Elop arrived. Nokia lost 75% of its share price in the three years before he was appointed. Nokia's market share was already eroding fast, the only place where it was maintaining its foothold was in low-end, low-margin dumbphones, and even there it was under attack by Asian competitors.

      Ask yourself: if the popular narrative about Elop being a Trojan horse inserted by Microsoft purposely to bring Nokia to ruin was true, why were there no nationalist howls of protest from the Finnish government? Anti-Americanism always makes good political capital in Europe, this story should have been tailor-made for it.

      Answer: because the Finns saw the story from close up, and they know that simplistic story isn't true.

    13. Re:Good riddance! by mfearby · · Score: 1

      http://saveie6.com/ results in a 404. I guess that's the joke? :-)

    14. Re:Good riddance! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Cries NOOOO!

      IE 6 is the best! It does websites the right way. Go ask any PHB? IE 6 teaches the Zen of patience, virtues, minimalism. Can Chrome teach life lessons? No

    15. Re:Good riddance! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      A matter of timing and moneying.

      The first (and only) MeeGo-based phone came out in 2011. The market was still open, so it could have succeeded - if only Stephen Elop weren't actively, publicly sabotaging it.

      The first Sailfish phone, on the other hand, only came out in 2013. By this point, the market had pretty much stabilized on Android. It's much harder now for an alternative system to take off. Even Tizen is only a niche system, and you know Jolla is much smaller than Samsung.

    16. Re:Good riddance! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      I was not even thinking of Android, but mainframes, supercomputers, internet servers, render farms, embedded devices...

    17. Re:Good riddance! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Uh, nobody was hyped for MeeGo.

      Pretty much every Nokia user was, which was a fuckton of people all around the world (except in North America). I think most of them had never even considered getting a non-Nokia phone, but when WP showed up, everyone said NOPE and ran to Android's arms.

    18. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you looked at a pie chart of Linux devices and called the tiny sliver "everything" ? Amazing..

  17. Re:Wow...What is Ballmer thinking now? by sinij · · Score: 1

    Ballmer wasn't wrong, he just didn't realize that consumers would put up with that. However, Microsoft learned these lessons and applying them with Win10 desktop.

  18. Spoiler alert by Trogre · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least their Zune business is alive and well.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  19. No New Monopolies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is still dominant in the OS and Office markets. And that's it. They have failed to dominate the internet, cloud, browsers, serves, database, embedded, phones and everything else they have tried. With the possible exception of Xbox. I regard this as strong evidence that Microsoft sucks, and wonder what life would have been like if we had been spared their OS and Office products as well.

    1. Re:No New Monopolies by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      Buy a Sony or Nintendo console.
      Buy a Mac or install Linux/BSD/etc.

      You'll see what life can be without Microsoft. Today.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:No New Monopolies by mikael · · Score: 1

      With the Internet Microsoft didn't get in early enough since they weren't in the UNIX server/storage market. ISP's offering home Internet with SLIP/PPP came out in 1993. Trumpet Winsock was the choice for many ISP's, offering PC owners a command prompt text based USENET browser and Email. As the large companies had already abandoned their proprietary network protocols into supporting TCP/IP, they weren't going to just switch over to another standard. So Microsoft just had to adopt TCP/IP in order for PC's to be able to communicate with other Internet servers. They then couldn't dominate the internet, cloud, servers, database markets.

      For a while they owned web browsers simply because they bundled Internet Explorer free with Windows and budget PC's. Microsoft made a loss on selling X-Box hardware but makes the profit from game licenses and royalties. The only reason they can dominate a market segment is because they are already there and can scare off investors that would be willing to fund rivals.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:No New Monopolies by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Pepperidge Farm remembers.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
  20. Windows Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What really sucks is now I have dead Windows Mobile stuff stuck in my desktop OS.

  21. Heard this beforw by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    It seems like I've heard this news before only for Microsoft to change its mind and try again. How many times has it been left for dead only to be resurrected? I've lost count ....

    1. Re:Heard this beforw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think anything Microsoft has done with Windows phone can be likened to any kind of "resurrection" you've got a funny definition of the word.

  22. They still make phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd not heard anything about Windows phones for quite a while when this article came up. Just checked the websites of the three main wireless companies in my area. None of them carry any phones using Windows.

    DEAD

  23. Obligatory by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

    (insert "Bring out your dead" Monty Python joke here)

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  24. Dead? by ChadSmith4920 · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to buy an Amazon Fire Phone?

  25. Piffle by onyxruby · · Score: 1

    The author wrongly assumed that Microsoft's phone business is the manufacture and selling of cell phones. Microsoft's phone business is in patents, and it brings in far more money from patents that it does phones.

    Reports range from 2 to 6 billions dollars every year in profits just from Android.

    https://www.howtogeek.com/1837...
    https://fossbytes.com/microsof...

    Samsung alone pays Microsoft 1 billion per year

    http://www.theverge.com/2014/1...

    Making handsets is simply a convenient way to stay in the patent creation business.

    1. Re:Piffle by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Eventually utility patents expire 20 years after initial filing date and so will the income in that time frame. Not sure how long Microsoft's patents have been extant, but I've read that MS has 127 patents associated with Android cell phones and maybe iOS phones, including things like touch interfaces.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:Piffle by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Android came out in 2009. If the patents dated to that time they would still have 60% of their life left. Other countries have their own patent lengths which can be shorter or longer. For the meanwhile they are arguably make more profit from Android than any of the manufactures. That is a lot of billions over the years.

      My point is that by keeping their phone OS alive they give a practical means by which their developers can look for 'new' things that can be patented. Those patents are worth far more than the cost of developing a lagging phone system (some of which is also offset by profits from the market place).

  26. Still a very good phone OS by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still like my Windows Phone, and my next one will be a Windows Phone, as well. The UI is much better than the other two.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Still a very good phone OS by maxrate · · Score: 1

      I love my Windows Phones - I've switched to iPhone because I found its smoother than Android. My current arsenal of somewhat up to date phones are: Galaxy S7, Windows 950XL, iPhone 6S. If Windows phone was still supported, it would still be my fav phone as it's really user friendly. Too bad it didn't do well in the market place. I'd say mostly bad attitudes as many that would dump on the phone never actually even held one or used one, or had some microsoft hate-on. I'm using my iPhone as my primary phone because I use an app called ForeFlight (only works with Apple, not Android or Windows Phone). I'm using my Galaxy S7 merely as my phone of choice for my DJI Phantom Drone for remote controlling it, and I use my Windows phone for my 'pager' - as it seems to have the very best 'bed-side/nigh-time' features I need to stay on top of server alerts, critical emails only, etc. With this set up, I can actually switch off my primary phone when I go to sleep and only get wakened if a server stops pinging. Anyways, I suspect my Windows Phone will last a couple years doing what it's doing for me today. Sorry to see it go.

    2. Re:Still a very good phone OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still like my Windows Phone, and my next one will be a Windows Phone, as well. The UI is much better than the other two.

      You may find it harder and harder to find a Windows Phone....but you'll be in good company with only a handful of others that will even admit they use a Windows Phone. Good luck.

    3. Re:Still a very good phone OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're on WP10, how do you handle scheduling updates and forced restarts. As far as I can tell you have to give WP10 a 6 hour window in which it can install updates and restart, during which it can be down for up to 20 mins. For me this made it completely unsuitable as a work phone as there are days when I do 24 hr on call.

    4. Re:Still a very good phone OS by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      I still like my Windows Phone, and my next one will be a Windows Phone, as well. The UI is much better than the other two.

      Hello, Microsoft PR shill.

    5. Re:Still a very good phone OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where half the icons are all the same size shape and color with no style whatsoever so the only ways to differentiate them the text label which is written in a tiny thin-line font and their position on the screen, and the other half of the icons are animated ads. Yeah great UI you have there.

    6. Re:Still a very good phone OS by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      I still like my Windows Phone, and my next one will be a Windows Phone, as well. The UI is much better than the other two.

      Launchers are easy when you only have to start three or four apps...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Still a very good phone OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say mostly bad attitudes as many that would dump on the phone never actually even held one or used one, or had some microsoft hate-on.

      Don't mistake the trolls of Slashdot with the market of phone buyers. Windows Phone has low market share because the carriers hate how little of their bloatware they can install on it. They have similar issues with Apple, but since iPhones are seen as a status symbol, they do not dare risk customers by not advertising their iPhone stocks.

    8. Re:Still a very good phone OS by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I'm a grownup. I don't do "apps".

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    9. Re:Still a very good phone OS by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Ironically, while I had these problems on my PC - when Windows 10 was first out - I never had it on any of my Lumias.

    10. Re:Still a very good phone OS by unixisc · · Score: 1

      It's still available on Amazon, even if the Microsoft store doesn't carry it.

  27. Whatever happened to Joe Belfiore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://mspoweruser.com/41823-...

    Been a lot longer than a year!

  28. iOS10 is much better than iOS9 on an iPhone6 by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    iOS 10 blows chunks on an iPhone 6 even

    My wife has an iPhone 6 and iOS 10 performs pretty well on it, and has a number of substantial improvements from iOS9... if nothing else the messaging app is much better and what do most non-technical people use anyway?

    On top of that are the invisible things like allowing call management apps and other app improvements possible on iOS10, and it has been nicer for her than iOS9 was.

    We'll see if that continues to hold through other iOS updates but she'll keep the phone 2-3 years more probably, Which will be fully supported unlike Windows phone going forward...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  29. . . . . .Windows phone is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is the last to know.

  30. Not good for customers (all 20 of us) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already sold my soul to Microsoft a long time ago, and now I have to pick between splitting it with either Apple or Google...

    (No, I haven't sold my soul to Google yet, not even in search).

    RIP

  31. Microsoft's Amazing Scientific Discovery: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water is wet .... news at 10.

  32. Continuum is dead, UWP is dead, MS is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure you phone will work fine, but the software that was supposed to be designed for Continuum won't ever be written of there's no market for it. Continuum is that, 'plug a device into a cradle and us it as desktop computer' thing they were pushing.

    Which in turn has a knock on effect on Microsoft's Universal Platform, which has no purpose now. Nobody will spend money writing portable code for a non-portable market.

    MS in turn would take a hit from this, but Google seems unable to get their platform together for larger than 10 inch tablets. All the android stuff is designed to run on battery limited platforms, operated by fingers. If you ever try Google Earth on Android, you can't even zoom out when using a mouse, because its pinch-zoom only with NO ZOOM ON THE FOOKING MOUSE.

    Dear Google, if you're not prepared to implement mouse wheel zoom, (or if it has a patent problem), then can you at least implement it as a two-finger mouse zoom.
    e.g. press BOTH mouse buttons, and it's like two diagonal fingers on the screen, move left and right to move the pinch closer or further horizontally. Move it up and down to pinch close or further vertically. i.e. two finger *mouse* pinch zoom, that can be used on existing apps without forcing additional work.

    Likewise a lot of their stuff REQUIRES fingers on a touch tablet.

    You can't close an app, you can only back back back back .... exit... which is stupid and yet Google are so smug they won't fix it.

    You can't ensure apps will be allowed to run if they're not the foreground app, because Android will shut them down at the blink of an eye. They are supposed to recover quickly and perfectly when reloaded, but that's usually impossible. They usually lose their state.

    Apps can't run in the background unless they also put an item in the notify. Which is why you see "USB is connected, tap here for options" items no notify. Suppose to be to stop battery hogs, but has no purpose on an Android desktop or TV or device designed for business apps.

    1. Re:Continuum is dead, UWP is dead, MS is dead by unixisc · · Score: 1

      From what I understood about Continuum, it's changing b/w desktop and tablet modes when something like a Surface is attached to, or removed from, the keyboard.

      I've not seen that come to phones, nor do I see it as essential. As it is, Lumias are ARM based, and so any software - like MS Office - has to be specifically there for both platforms. Where they are useful is that if one uses OneDrive to store documents but needs to access them w/o their laptop, like say at an airport, the Lumia comes in handy.

  33. Does this mean Windows 11 can have a normal PC UI? by no1nose · · Score: 0

    I am hanging onto my Windows 7 machines until MS releases an OS with a Windows 7-like UI. If Windows 11 doesn't have a normal UI I may have to switch to Mac or Linix. I have hopes for 11 though, because they say to avoid all even-numbered Windows releases. So far the advice has been spot on.

  34. Re:Still a very good phone OS - updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have W10 on my phone and have never had it try to restart spontaneously. Of course, it's old enough that it's *not supported* so that may have something to do with it. MS' recent announcements about 1703 on phones suggest that your imaginary problem will become no problem unless by some miracle you have one of the few Windows Phones (a subset of an infinitesimal market share) that are less than 3 years old and therefore likely to upgrade.

    Alternative: reset your phone, which if it originally came with W8 will probably roll back to that. No spontaneous restarts for them. Or use tools from Win Insider program to roll it back.

    Going forward, can I get the WinPhone user interface (tiles, live or otherwise (Win8 didn't have live tiles, mostly) instead of icons; scrolling "start" page so less-often-used stuff can be there but "below the fold;" easy customization ("desktop" picture, colors, size of tiles, etc.). Yes, there are major differences between W10 and Android/Linux under the hood, but there seems to be no reason that the visuals and general operation can't be sympathized. MS has its major mobile apps on Android anyway, often updating there before (or instead of) for Windows phones. Frankly, the WinPhone UI/shell works better for my aging eyes and phat phingers than the old-school icons-on-a-screen approach of Android.

  35. Cancer by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Beaten by Linux.

    (Monkey boy got one thing right.)

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  36. Re:Does this mean Windows 11 can have a normal PC by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    I am hanging onto my Windows 7 machines until MS releases an OS with a Windows 7-like UI.

    While you're waiting, you can dual-install Linux and have that right now. (KDE)

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  37. Re:Wow...What is Ballmer thinking now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, so we will soon be able to identify die-hard Windows Mobile users by their carting around a desktop and mobile power supply?

  38. Microsoft offer us money... by hlee · · Score: 2

    A year or two ago Microsoft offered our company money and even some engineers to help to port our mobile product to Windows phone. Since we were really strapped for engineering resources, which we would still have to devote to the port despite the assistance, but not short on cash, we turned them down because we felt our other priorities were more important than Windows phone. We must have been the minority to do so because they were incredulous at our rejection. Just as well it seems.

    1. Re:Microsoft offer us money... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      We must have been the minority to do so because they were incredulous at our rejection.

      Maybe, but that's a very common tactic of salesfolk and when it's especially over the top it's a fair indication that they are being rejected a lot.

    2. Re:Microsoft offer us money... by skeib · · Score: 1

      Did the same thing in 2013. They didn't like it then either :)

  39. But why?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something I've consistently noticed about people with WinPhones (myself included) is they freaken love them. I've owned all three (iPhone, Android [LG, Sony], and Nokia/Win. I liked my iPhone, but I love my WinPhone. Even in this post there are fanboyz selling this product.

    Which makes me wonder, how did this happen. iPhone certainly has advocates -people who love them and will sell them for Apple by word of mouth. Even Android does (but to a lesser extent) in the case of some higher end phones like the Samsungs. But WinPhones covered every pricepoint and were roundly loved by there owners. Where is the failure here? I just don't get how a really good product dies.

    1. Re:But why?!?!? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Sales. Seriously is that hard to figure out. Nobody is buying the phone get over it.

  40. Goodbye Windows Universal by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2

    Hope you never escape the furthest depths of Hell.

  41. Bummer by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    As usual, Windows phone users are flabbergasted.
    Both of them.

    1. Re:Bummer by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      LMOL....

  42. Gets more updates than my Android tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm on the Insider program, and my Lumia 640 gets more updates in a month than either my Android 4.3 and 6.0 have ever gotten throughout their entire lifetime.

    Seriously, when walking out of the store, Android feels like abandonware. At least I know the known vulnerabilities are getting addressed on WP. On Android...the list is just getting bigger over time.

    1. Re:Gets more updates than my Android tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My advice to anyone thinking of an Android purchase has always been either to go the Google route (was Nexus, now Pixel) or buy a device that has an "update escape path" of a custom ROM (something that's never been available to Windows or Apple phones/tablets). If you're worried about the warranty, wait until it expires before you go the custom ROM route.

      LineageOS 14 has given my Android tablets a new lease of life - heck, my ancient Nexus 10 - even Google gave up on this a few years ago - is now running Android 7.1.2 pretty well (OK, minus camera support but I never take photos with my tablets anyway).

    2. Re:Gets more updates than my Android tablets by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      Seconding this. The 640 was or is a great value smart phone. It's literally saved me hundreds in data fees in the less than year that I've had it.

  43. I wonder if ... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this means they'll stop trying to turn Windows UI into an phone OS...

    Who am I kidding, that ship has long since sailed... sigh.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  44. Let me observe a moment of silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for your tragic loss - only $200m this year.. It's a shame they had to drag Nokia down with them..

  45. It's been dead for years by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    This time, Microsoft, you may not consider yourself middle-fingered - you ARE middle-fingered.

  46. With UWP there will be apps, no stock is the probl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With UWP there will be apps, but only if developers specifically export to a Phone device target. (UWP isn't universal for all devices automatically, you still have to build a specific interface for each target device, it's only underlying program functions that are portable) Still there is hope.

    Except they are not even in stock for months at a time, it seems like MS doesn't even care about selling them

  47. rofl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too many damn fucking m$ shills on this site lol...
    anyways if your phone can't run the app store or play store then throw that phone the fuck out the window...
    it's simple as.
    period.

  48. Yeah but did you read the Neowin comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of people are still in denial, and that's just the tip of the zealot iceberg....

  49. Karma getting to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the years of them doing stupid, evil stuff to their customers and the industry as a whole has come to roost in this one. Nobody wanted them to succeed and then dominate and lock in another tech industry segment. Combine this with the lead Google and Apple had and they were doomed.

    The REALLY sad part in my mind is what Microsoft should have been: when they were fighting IBM for control of the PC market, it looked like they were going to be the champions of openness and user choice. If they had only continued down that path, they could have been so much more (think of a "trustworthy Microsoft" and what they could have done for things like digital payments - their board of directors should have fired BG all their decision makers over that miss.)

  50. Conflicted by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    I'm conflicted about this. Although I'd never own one, I felt it was important for Windows Phone to continue as competition (however feeble) against Android and IOS. It's important to have multiple vendors pushing each other to excel.

    I'm worried now about Microsoft tablet. Of all the tablet makers, Microsoft seems the only one who at least pays lip service to content *creation* rather than mere content consumption. If Microsoft fails in the tablet market (which could easily happen, considering all the other missteps they've made) the message could easily be that nobody wants to create content on a tablet, which is profoundly untrue. Its that there haven't been good solutions yet.

    I'm saying all of this not as a Microsoft fan. I run Winders because it runs the Adobe suite and I can't justify the cost of a mac. (I can build a PC to my specifications for a fraction of the cost.) The OS is a means to an end, not an end in itself. If the Adobe suite ran on Linux, M$ and Apple could both go screw.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  51. Really? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Was it ever alive?

  52. Re:Really? You Believed Microsoft's Upgrade Promse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, ever heard of Windows Phone 7... the iPhone killer OS (Android was not consequential enough in Microsoft's eyes to be considered a competitor when they were working on WP7) that had no upgrade path to Windows Phone 8 for chumps that bought Windows Phone 7 Phones?

    At least some phones got Windows 10 upgrades... that's at least a partial promise fulfilled by Microsoft. Better than nothing.