Why are we concerned if people, in general, accept the big bang theory or evolution? Why not worry about general relativity and quantum mechanics?
For the vast majority of people, it simply does not matter. Will it pay my mortgage or put food on my table if the sun revolves around the earth or the other way around? If not, then why should they care?
We're all (sometime I wonder though) nerds here, so we care, but most people don't. I know that the operation of my GPS navigator depends on both general relativity and quantum mechanics, but it works whether I believe them or not. How many other people know or care?
A better question would be to ask if they believe that the scientific method is a valid method of seeking the truth. Another question would be if the scientific method was the only valid method of seeking the truth.
Re:Jobs always wanted to be Bill Gates
on
The Apple Two
·
· Score: 1
The thing is that Steve Jobs was gone from Apple. The company floundered and eventually begged him to come back. Since he came back the company has been flourishing.
Personally, I wish that computers still had switches and lights where you could toggle in the bootstrap. Sadly, those days are gone even on mainframe computers.
Re:Apple has made Microsoft look "open".
on
The Apple Two
·
· Score: 1
Apple's darkest days were when they used closed architecture to ensure that Apple was the sole provider of peripherals and (to a lesser extent) software. You couldn't buy a freakin' mouse without going back to Apple. Today, Apple has superb technology that can beat Microsoft (and even Linux) on the desktop. If Apple becomes arrogant and complacent, MS will close the gap, just as they did with the original Macintosh.
Perhaps your memory is a little different than mine. Fairly early on (I think that it was just after the original Mac) they added a SCSI bus and there were numerous 3rd party hard drives and other peripherals available. The Mac SE did have an expansion slot that had 3rd party cards available. There were also a number of 3rd party gadgets that attached to the ADB. Even now, there's quite a flourishing 3rd party for iPod add-ons.
Some of the first applications for the Mac were things like Microsoft Word and Excel. My first job out of collage was writing numerical analysis software on a Mac SE using Lightspeed C.
Now, I'll admit that the iPod family is a different thing than the Mac family, but I'm just not interested in personal/portable music players so I ignore them. I did have a Walkman once, but rarely used it. I like to be able to hear what is going on around me when I'm out and about.
...Have you never read release notes that have a list of "known bugs"? Generally that's open source software. The closed source software has the exact same list, it just exists on the software makers private network...
This list also exists for aviation (and I'm sure other life critical) software. In the case of aviation software, it gets submitted to the FAA (or whoever your regulatory agency is, along with an analysis of each bug and why it is OK not to fix it.
Years ago, I had a Datsun B210. There probably wasn't even software in the car radio. I lived in the Seattle area at the time. It's fairly humid there and at certain time a little ice would form in the carburetor and cause the throttle to stick open. The first time it happened to me was a bit of a shock. I stepped on the clutch and the RPMs jumped. I then hit the brakes, and turned off the engine and costed to the side of the highway.
The next time it happened I discovered that kicking the accelerator pedal would break the ice and let things work normally. Not too long after that, "Oxygenated Fuel" was introduced and the problem disappeared.
I'm taking a class in enterprise modeling and the professor is adamant that most improvements come from improving the process. A clear streamlined manual process can run rings around a well automated byzantine process.
The key is to take a big picture look at the whole process and then ask why things are done that way.
One of the examples from class was a process used to procure prototype parts. The process used to take 80 days and people were happy with it. He and a couple of grad students were able to reduce it to 20 days.
It's mostly getting rid of boneheaded things. One supplier would build a prototype part before building the final part. Why bother building a prototype of a prototype??? If you take a step back, you can start to find things like this and eliminated them.
much of it from bitter people who for whatever reason cannot have an iPhone
You mean all those people with enough common sense to realise it's overpriced shiny crap ? They must be so bitter and twisted, having to live in the real world instead of "Jobs Worlds".
Sadly this, in a nutshell, is the caliber of argument over things that are largely a matter of opinion.
You guys are all missing the potential. You build a Linux box that controls all the stuff in you house - lights, HVAC, whatever. Add a bunch of sensors. Build some web pages to control it all. Then use your iPad (or iPod touch) to wirelessly network to it and control everything.
Sure it may not be a great standalone computer, but I bet it would work quite well as a front end controller to some other system.
After programming in Perl, did you ever go back and try to figure out what you did a year ago?
I've gone back years later and figured out what I was doing with Perl code. If you write your code for legibility and remember that you shouldn't write code to the limit of your cleverness, you can do it too. Now, why I thought that it would be a good idea to write a combination text-based adventure game, symbolic math program is another question;-)
Sadly, many people seem to write code to show off how clever they are.
I've also had experience deciphering obscure code -- a grading system for a school written in BASIC-PLUS with two character variable names and a 256 (or so) character line length limit. After doing this for a while, you begin to see the benefit of writing legible code.
Maybe he means some females will hear the scream of their sisteren after their wings are fried and they're tumbling to the ground and thus avoid that area.
Fixed that for you. It's the sisters that are being targeted here.
As the rate of reboots increases, we'll eventually get to the point where no movie is completed before the story gets rebooted. Once we reach this point, there will be no more movies and we can all curl up by the fire with a cup of hot cocoa and a good book.
If you're interested in something like Second Life, but where you have complete control, check out OpenSim. It's an open source (BSD license) virtual world engine.
It's kind of surprising how few people realize this disadvantage of the GPL. Keep that in mind the next time you use it on a project.
How is this a disadvantage of the GPL?
If I sell software with anything like a typical commercial license and I decide to stop supporting it, you're SOL. With the GPL, at least you have the source and can spend money to hire someone to support it.
As far as the trademark is concerned, if I own BobSQL, you can't call your own database BobSQL regardless of how either one is licensed.
Slashdot Mirror
Why are we concerned if people, in general, accept the big bang theory or evolution? Why not worry about general relativity and quantum mechanics?
For the vast majority of people, it simply does not matter. Will it pay my mortgage or put food on my table if the sun revolves around the earth or the other way around? If not, then why should they care?
We're all (sometime I wonder though) nerds here, so we care, but most people don't. I know that the operation of my GPS navigator depends on both general relativity and quantum mechanics, but it works whether I believe them or not. How many other people know or care?
A better question would be to ask if they believe that the scientific method is a valid method of seeking the truth. Another question would be if the scientific method was the only valid method of seeking the truth.
The thing is that Steve Jobs was gone from Apple. The company floundered and eventually begged him to come back. Since he came back the company has been flourishing.
Personally, I wish that computers still had switches and lights where you could toggle in the bootstrap. Sadly, those days are gone even on mainframe computers.
Apple's darkest days were when they used closed architecture to ensure that Apple was the sole provider of peripherals and (to a lesser extent) software. You couldn't buy a freakin' mouse without going back to Apple. Today, Apple has superb technology that can beat Microsoft (and even Linux) on the desktop. If Apple becomes arrogant and complacent, MS will close the gap, just as they did with the original Macintosh.
Perhaps your memory is a little different than mine. Fairly early on (I think that it was just after the original Mac) they added a SCSI bus and there were numerous 3rd party hard drives and other peripherals available. The Mac SE did have an expansion slot that had 3rd party cards available. There were also a number of 3rd party gadgets that attached to the ADB. Even now, there's quite a flourishing 3rd party for iPod add-ons.
Some of the first applications for the Mac were things like Microsoft Word and Excel. My first job out of collage was writing numerical analysis software on a Mac SE using Lightspeed C.
Now, I'll admit that the iPod family is a different thing than the Mac family, but I'm just not interested in personal/portable music players so I ignore them. I did have a Walkman once, but rarely used it. I like to be able to hear what is going on around me when I'm out and about.
This list also exists for aviation (and I'm sure other life critical) software. In the case of aviation software, it gets submitted to the FAA (or whoever your regulatory agency is, along with an analysis of each bug and why it is OK not to fix it.
It's still a fake dialog trying to trick the user. In your case, it just didn't succeed.
Ever hear of "Big Blue", aka IBM? Even if they haven't patented it, I'm sure that they have prior art and enough lawyers to sink you.
Sorry about that. You'll have to pick another color.
Yes, and since I don't have a botnet, I should be safe.
Nerds care.
Wii-style controllers are for fun. Not for accuracy. Not for performance. Not for precision. They are meant to be a fun tool to play a game...
Pardon my ignorance, but I thought that games were suppose to be fun, or maybe I'm just not a hardcore gamer.
Years ago, I had a Datsun B210. There probably wasn't even software in the car radio. I lived in the Seattle area at the time. It's fairly humid there and at certain time a little ice would form in the carburetor and cause the throttle to stick open. The first time it happened to me was a bit of a shock. I stepped on the clutch and the RPMs jumped. I then hit the brakes, and turned off the engine and costed to the side of the highway.
The next time it happened I discovered that kicking the accelerator pedal would break the ice and let things work normally. Not too long after that, "Oxygenated Fuel" was introduced and the problem disappeared.
I'm taking a class in enterprise modeling and the professor is adamant that most improvements come from improving the process. A clear streamlined manual process can run rings around a well automated byzantine process.
The key is to take a big picture look at the whole process and then ask why things are done that way.
One of the examples from class was a process used to procure prototype parts. The process used to take 80 days and people were happy with it. He and a couple of grad students were able to reduce it to 20 days.
It's mostly getting rid of boneheaded things. One supplier would build a prototype part before building the final part. Why bother building a prototype of a prototype??? If you take a step back, you can start to find things like this and eliminated them.
Just because Republicans say is doesn't mean that they do it (this is generally true of all politicians, not just Republicans).
People have been predicting the demise of Apple for 30+ years. Eventually one of then will be right.
much of it from bitter people who for whatever reason cannot have an iPhone
You mean all those people with enough common sense to realise it's overpriced shiny crap ? They must be so bitter and twisted, having to live in the real world instead of "Jobs Worlds".
Sadly this, in a nutshell, is the caliber of argument over things that are largely a matter of opinion.
You guys are all missing the potential. You build a Linux box that controls all the stuff in you house - lights, HVAC, whatever. Add a bunch of sensors. Build some web pages to control it all. Then use your iPad (or iPod touch) to wirelessly network to it and control everything.
Sure it may not be a great standalone computer, but I bet it would work quite well as a front end controller to some other system.
...nothing says "I have a small penis" like owning something from Apple.
Of course it's small. My .mac email address filters out all the "enlarge your penis" spam so I never have an opportunity to do anything about it.
After programming in Perl, did you ever go back and try to figure out what you did a year ago?
I've gone back years later and figured out what I was doing with Perl code. If you write your code for legibility and remember that you shouldn't write code to the limit of your cleverness, you can do it too. Now, why I thought that it would be a good idea to write a combination text-based adventure game, symbolic math program is another question ;-)
Sadly, many people seem to write code to show off how clever they are.
I've also had experience deciphering obscure code -- a grading system for a school written in BASIC-PLUS with two character variable names and a 256 (or so) character line length limit. After doing this for a while, you begin to see the benefit of writing legible code.
Maybe he means some females will hear the scream of their sisteren after their wings are fried and they're tumbling to the ground and thus avoid that area.
Fixed that for you. It's the sisters that are being targeted here.
Um, Europe does consist of many nations.
It'll have a stylus and handwriting recognition, and they're calling it the "Newton."
They will never call it "Newton". My money is on Leibniz
I've been taking some simulation/modeling classes and one thing that they have drummed into us is the following quote:
"All models are wrong. Some models are useful." -- George Box
As the rate of reboots increases, we'll eventually get to the point where no movie is completed before the story gets rebooted. Once we reach this point, there will be no more movies and we can all curl up by the fire with a cup of hot cocoa and a good book.
Well, one can dream...
I'm unemployed you insensitive clod.
If you're interested in something like Second Life, but where you have complete control, check out OpenSim. It's an open source (BSD license) virtual world engine.
It's kind of surprising how few people realize this disadvantage of the GPL. Keep that in mind the next time you use it on a project.
How is this a disadvantage of the GPL?
If I sell software with anything like a typical commercial license and I decide to stop supporting it, you're SOL. With the GPL, at least you have the source and can spend money to hire someone to support it.
As far as the trademark is concerned, if I own BobSQL, you can't call your own database BobSQL regardless of how either one is licensed.
So, how is this a disadvantage of the GPL?