They are conditioned to believe that if they touch the papers that are dropped from the sky that they will die. And if they touch them anyways they are sent to labor camp.
All these telescopes are looking for planets that orbit in front of their suns, relative to our viewing angle. We only know they are there from the shadow they cast toward us.
How will we discover planets that are orbiting stars, but that do not cross in front of our field of view?
And even if joe q american does care, so what? Individually I cant change anything, and as a group nobody gives a fuck. Anyone who could do something is already in on it.
My subscription to Esquire is something silly, like $12 a year. Not taking into account the cost of the iPad, buying the iPad version of the magazine costs $5 an issue. That's $12 vs $60 a year.
So, why should I buy the digital version when the print version is not just better, but cheaper? And I dont need a specialized tool to read it.
Kids get an expectation of "COOL, lets do Science!" and end up with boring, complicated, and badly taught stuff that turns them away instead of getting them interested.
Both Lifehacker and Gizmodo have been running nothing but security stories since this happened. And they all have the theme of blaming users for having weak passwords.
They are a metal version of hacky sacks.
A cloth toy that's been around since the 1960's.
For more info, see Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footbag
"Hacky sack" is trademarked by some multinational, so I have to use the generic term for them instead.
Slashdot Mirror
Soon we will be able to put our heads in cryofreeze and become slow time travelers to the future.
They are conditioned to believe that if they touch the papers that are dropped from the sky that they will die. And if they touch them anyways they are sent to labor camp.
What could a North Korean website possibly have on it that's worth visiting?
How will we discover planets that are orbiting stars, but that do not cross in front of our field of view?
Hmm, true. I guess I skipped a few steps ahead :)
If something is there concentrate or synthesize it and test it one by one.
And even if joe q american does care, so what? Individually I cant change anything, and as a group nobody gives a fuck. Anyone who could do something is already in on it.
They kidnap females so they can rape them.
Yup, they sure act human-like.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlBiLNN1NhQ
Did you remember to turn off adblock first?
Damn Obama, wasting our taxe... oh? Whats that? Russian Scientists you say?
I went with a Lifehacker build from 2008-09. $1200 got me a $6000 equivalent Mac with dual 22" monitors.
Using software update, anyone know if this can run without mods on my hackintosh?
So, why should I buy the digital version when the print version is not just better, but cheaper? And I dont need a specialized tool to read it.
Charge him by the bug. You'll see how quick he'll make sure hes not paying to fix the same one twice.
Kids get an expectation of "COOL, lets do Science!" and end up with boring, complicated, and badly taught stuff that turns them away instead of getting them interested.
Oh, Brain part X is big/small/odd, so he has trait Y"
Isn't that what Brain Cancer specialists look for?
Now I have yet another excuse for why I never remove my sombrero.
How is that a prison worthy offense? Or is it just lawyerese for "getaway lookout"?
brontobytes sounds like something from the Flintstones.
Stargates ain't cheap to run yo.
You skipped one.
Both Lifehacker and Gizmodo have been running nothing but security stories since this happened. And they all have the theme of blaming users for having weak passwords.
Their whole strategy so far has been to blame the users: "Its not Gawkers fault your passwords are so weak."
"Hacky sack" is trademarked by some multinational, so I have to use the generic term for them instead.