Slashdot Mirror


Extinct Mammoth, Coming To a Zoo Near You

Techmeology writes "Professor Akira Iritani of Kyoto University plans to use recent developments in cloning technology to give life to the currently extinct woolly mammoth. Although earlier efforts in the 1990s were unsuccessful due to damage caused by extreme cold, Professor Iritani believes he can use a technique pioneered by Dr Wakayama (who successfully cloned a frozen mouse) to overcome this obstacle. This technique will enable Professor Iritani to identify viable cell nuclei, and transfer them to egg cells of an African elephant which will carry the mammoth for a 600 day pregnancy."

312 comments

  1. That would be awesome by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pleistocene park, coming soon to a zoo near you. Doesn't quite have the same ring as "Jurassic" though.

    Still I am willing to bet that this creature, if created, will be called "Manny", after our Ice Age mammoth movie star... any takers?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:That would be awesome by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Ice Age Park.

      I'm sure giving birth to a mammoth will have no negative consequences. :-|

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:That would be awesome by aztektum · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome or hybrid mutant mammoth-elephant overlords!

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:That would be awesome by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Meh.

      We wiped them out once, we can do it again. If you're descended from genes too slow to outrun and outwit a woolly mammoth, how the fuck did you get here in the first place?

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:That would be awesome by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      hybrid mutant mammoth-elephant

      They play an important role in the very good sci-fi novel The Wind-up Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi..

      And they are not without negative consequences.

      If you haven't read it, you'd probably enjoy it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:That would be awesome by JustOK · · Score: 2

      The RCMP will save us again. The M is for Mamouth, and of course the old saying "We always get our mamouth."

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Really? UID < 200K and that's the best you've got?

    7. Re:That would be awesome by meerling · · Score: 1

      Do you think they'll have nut obsessed rodents?

      The birthing is unlikely to have negative effects since both species are closely related, have the same approximate size, and have no known physiognomy variations that can cause issues. Unless the host mother is allergic to mammoth wool... :)

    8. Re:That would be awesome by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Also, the third book of Stephen Baxter's Mammoth omnibus.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    9. Re:That would be awesome by PatPending · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, as long as they taste delicious, I, too, shall welcome them.

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    10. Re:That would be awesome by camperslo · · Score: 1

      And think of the food....

      There's that segment in the closing segment of the old Flintstones cartoon series where a drive-in serves ribs on a tray on the side of the car, and the car tips over.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJu8RreAGnM&feature=related

    11. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends how tasty they are...

    12. Re:That would be awesome by camperslo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you think they'll have nut obsessed rodents?

      As much as squirrels and others love nuts, I think some crows in Japan deserve credit for doing something different with nuts. NHK (via Mhz WorldView) reports that birds have learned not only to drop nuts in the roadway where cars break them open, but to do it at intersections where the traffic gets stopped so they can pick up the pieces.

      PBS also reported it:

      http://www.pbs.org/lifeofbirds/brain/index.html

    13. Re:That would be awesome by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      I'm sure giving birth to a mammoth will have no negative consequences. :-|
      Maybe some for the mother/keepers and maybe even those near the zoo if a fence fails but I very much doubt there will be any large scale consequences from breeding mammoths. We would be able to deal with them long before they got a chance to establish a breeding colony.

      It's the small fast breeding animals you really have to watch as once released into an ecosystem they can be nearly impossible to eliminate.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:That would be awesome by aztec1430 · · Score: 1

      And Footfall... although they're not technically mammoths or elephants...

    15. Re:That would be awesome by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Heh, read that book a LONG time ago. Worst propulsion idea EVER!

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    16. Re:That would be awesome by quenda · · Score: 1

      Pleistocene park, ... Doesn't quite have the same ring as "Jurassic" though.

      No matter. Go ahead and call it Jurassic. The dinosaurs in the book/movie were from the Cretaceous period, but that obviously did not have the same ring either.

      will be called "Manny", after our Ice Age mammoth movie star.

      Much cooler if it was named after Manny, the big hairy guy from Black Books.

    17. Re:That would be awesome by an00bis · · Score: 0

      go back to fark

    18. Re:That would be awesome by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      If you're descended from genes too slow to outrun and outwit a woolly mammoth, how the fuck did you get here in the first place?

      Dude, look around out there ... there is a large part of the human race that likely couldn't outrun or outwit much of anything.

      Let a woolly mammoth loose in a mall, and I'm betting on the mammoth until someone else arrives who can fight back. As a species, we don't necessarily select for direct confrontations with large mammals very much nowadays. :-P

      Just because our ancestors did all of those things, doesn't mean we still do.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    19. Re:That would be awesome by guyminuslife · · Score: 2

      So am I, although without the sarcasm.

      Recall that our ancestors used to hunt those things down and eat them. Sheesh, if we ever need advice on handling a mammoth problem, we can always see what the Lascaux guys had to say.

      Plus the scientific potential is enormous, even disregarding the awesomeness of it all. I, for one, would like to know if mammoths enjoy peanuts.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    20. Re:That would be awesome by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Pleistocene park, coming soon to a zoo near you. Doesn't quite have the same ring as "Jurassic" though.

      But you can invite Polythene Pam along.

    21. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We wiped them out once, we can do it again. If you're descended from genes too slow to outrun and outwit a woolly mammoth, how the fuck did you get here in the first place?

      Just so you did it once doesn't mean you can do it again. Read about what could happen if the 1918 flu were to make a comeback.

      I wonder how if a dinosaur brought back to this world would live.. forget about dinosaur vs human:

      (1) It has to adapt to current climate, food, etc. without any time for it.

      (2) It has to be resilient against all kinds of pathogens of today, which may or may not be a far superior match.

      There is a reason why these things couldn't survive in the first place.

    22. Re:That would be awesome by bdeclerc · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about the atomic-explosion drive, that was a *real* idea, called "Project Orion", and I would argue that at least bean-driven flatulence could be considered a worse propulsion idea...

    23. Re:That would be awesome by pcr_teacher · · Score: 1

      They are already working on creating Pleistocene park using animals similar to the extinct mega-fauna herbivores.
      (http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2008/sepoct/features/siberia.html)

      The idea is that mammoths damaged the lichen and mosses of the tundra, thus allowing grass to grow, drying out the soil, preventing the permafrost from forming,

      The permafrost locks up nutrients for the plants and animals and forms a high albedo surface that doesn't warm up quickly in springtime.
      (http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2011/3101365.htm#transcript)

      The scape marks on the bottom of the mammoth tusks indicates that they probably scraped the snow off the grass in winter, allowing other smaller herbivores to find food and survive winter.

      The change from tundra to grassland has the potential to have huge climatic effects
        and help prevent a huge release of methane (a much worse greenhouse gas than CO2).

      Recreating the Pleistocene grasslands is not a silly, flippant or ill-considered idea

    24. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure giving birth to a mammoth will have no negative consequences. :-|
      Maybe some for the mother/keepers and maybe even those near the zoo if a fence fails but I very much doubt there will be any large scale consequences from breeding mammoths. We would be able to deal with them long before they got a chance to establish a breeding colony.

      It's the small fast breeding animals you really have to watch as once released into an ecosystem they can be nearly impossible to eliminate.

      If you limit "negative consequences" to consequences for humans.

      Do we even know how to keep a mammoth captive in a way that does not harm the mammoth?

    25. Re:That would be awesome by AffidavitDonda · · Score: 1

      I would like to have a mammoth wool sweater

    26. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, would like to know if mammoths enjoy peanuts.

      Only saber-tooth peanuts.

    27. Re:That would be awesome by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering that elephants can run at 40 km/h, which is 100 meters in 9 seconds flat, 200 meters in 18 seconds and 400 meters in 36 seconds, and the world records for those distances are 9.58, 19.19 and 43.18 seconds respectively, I fail to see how the inability to outrun a mammoth has ever been a problem.

      Granted, we have no real knowledge of their actual speeds, so it could be 5 km/h but it could also be 60 km/h like a giraffe or 50 km/h like a white rhinoceros.

      Humans have never really had a need to outrun any of our prey animals. We have relied on intelligence, stamina and weapons to take them down, not speed and strength.

      But I'm guessing that just means you didn't descend from genes smart enough to outwit a cow.

    28. Re:That would be awesome by agw · · Score: 1

      Really? UID < 200K and that's the best you've got?

      What were you expecting? "In Soviet Pleistocene, the woolly mammoth clones YOU!"?

    29. Re:That would be awesome by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      and I would argue that at least bean-driven flatulence could be considered a worse propulsion idea...

      You've never met my Uncle Tony.

      He lets one go and everyone near him is propelled away at the speed of light.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We wiped them out once, we can do it again.

      Most likely it will happen again. It takes at least two woolly mammoths to breed them in captivity. And the other one might say anything from "You're not my type" to "I wouldn't date you even if you were the last mammoth on earth!" Also, one can't keep abusing elephants to breed mammoths as it will further endanger elephants as a species.

    31. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pleistocene park, coming soon to a zoo near you. Doesn't quite have the same ring as "Jurassic" though.

      Still I am willing to bet that this creature, if created, will be called "Manny", after our Ice Age mammoth movie star... any takers?

      Well if thats the MAMMOTH!...Wheres the DADDOTH?...!

    32. Re:That would be awesome by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm tasty.... they should prolly bring back the Dodo too. Apparently they tasted good, although that might be because the few people who ate them had been on a boat for weeks (or months maybe?).

    33. Re:That would be awesome by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Do we even know how to keep a mammoth captive in a way that does not harm the mammoth?
      I guess it depends on what exactly you mean by "does not harm". From a physical point of view we keep elephants in zoos all the time and afaict we have learnt to build exibits that contain them without causing them to hurt themselves in escape attempts. I'd expect mammoths to be mostly a matter of scaling up the techniques we have already developed for elephants.

      Noone will ever really know the physiological side for any zoo animal. We can see outward signs of happiness but we will never know if they really know or care that they are being kept captive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    34. Re:That would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad enough when people cite movies for anything in Slashdot. Just makes me want to cry when they children's cartoon shows.

    35. Re:That would be awesome by icebike · · Score: 1

      They are/were not that different from other large elephants. You can build a free range park and let them roam.

      They were not that dangerous, and were routinely hunted by proto humans using spears. The long standing theory is that they were hunted to extinction, although the darling theory this week is Climate Change did them in.

      These are not so big and not so tough that they can't be brought down by your average elephant gun.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    36. Re:That would be awesome by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Actually the Flintstones were an adult cartoon

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    37. Re:That would be awesome by fenix849 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean repelled.

    38. Re:That would be awesome by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Actually, the more tasty, the less likely to be wiped out by humans. Cows, and pigs, are not considered endangered.

    39. Re:That would be awesome by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      They are/were not that different from other large elephants. You can build a free range park and let them roam.

      They were not that dangerous, and were routinely hunted by proto humans using spears. The long standing theory is that they were hunted to extinction, although the darling theory this week is Climate Change did them in.

      These are not so big and not so tough that they can't be brought down by your average elephant gun.

      Global Warming did not arrive in time to save them.

      BTW Would an elephant gun used in that way be a Mammoth Firearm.

    40. Re:That would be awesome by Phoghat · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Sure everything's fine, them comes the yelling and screaming" Jeff Goldblum

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    41. Re:That would be awesome by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Humans have never really had a need to outrun any of our prey animals. We have relied on intelligence, stamina and weapons to take them down, not speed and strength.

      Okay.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    42. Re:That would be awesome by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      You know, +5 funny doesn't contribute to your karma, but +5 informative doesn't make you shoot milk out your nose

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    43. Re:That would be awesome by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Bulgarian crows as well.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. before you do it by Bizzeh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    before the hundreds of comments saying that this is wrong and shouldnt happen show up... dont bother.... lighten up and have a drink

    1. Re:before you do it by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fuck that, I can't wait until one of these things goes nuts and starts goring the fuck out of everything.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.

    3. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      before the hundreds of comments saying that this is wrong and shouldnt happen show up... dont bother.... lighten up and have a drink

      fact of the matter is, the people who want to do this "just cuz we can lulz" are morons. really, really stupid.

      think of all the damage kudzoo is doing in habitats where it is non-native. same deal with lots of other organisms that are NOT extinct. they hop aboard ships and such and find themselves in a new environment where they have no natural predators. then they overrun the place. these are organisms that have merely changed location in space. we've had similar problems with frogs and hornets and other invasive non-native species.

      what other things can happen with organisms that have changed location in time? how will the ecosystem handle their sudden reappearance? what pressing need do we have for mammoths that overrides the risk? none.

      this is just plain bad decision-making. Jurassic Park is a lot like 1984: it was meant as a warning, not a how-to.

    4. Re:before you do it by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny

      before the hundreds of comments saying that this is wrong and shouldnt happen show up... dont bother.... lighten up and have a drink

      I can't. I don't even know what wine goes with elephant, let alone what wine goes with mammoth.

    5. Re:before you do it by AshtangiMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A warning. Like refer madness was a warning.

    6. Re:before you do it by PatPending · · Score: 5, Informative

      lighten up and have a drink

      I shall have a 3,400-year-old Mesoamerican beer.

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    7. Re:before you do it by PatPending · · Score: 2

      Try a nice Chianti. (At least it pairs well with liver and fava beans.)

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    8. Re:before you do it by WillDraven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this was an insect or small animal that might escape and breed you could have a point, but we're talking about a MAMMOTH. I seriously doubt they're going to manage to sneak off and start breeding in the wild without anybody noticing.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    9. Re:before you do it by Denihil · · Score: 1

      this is a chance for humanity to reverse some extinctions our race may have helped cause. i think it's a great concept and im not sure how a couple extremely large mammals, kept under massive public scrutiny and scientific attention, have some chance of running off and ruining a ecosystem. frankly it sounds a bit nuts.

      --
      WÌÌfÍ--ÍSÌÒÍ...Í...ÌHÌÍfÍÍÍ--ÍÍÍ
    10. Re:before you do it by paiute · · Score: 5, Funny

      think of all the damage kudzoo is doing in habitats where it is non-native.

      The mammoths will eat all the kudzu.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    11. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great idea! I wonder what wine you serve with roast mammoth.

    12. Re:before you do it by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      what other things can happen with organisms that have changed location in time? how will the ecosystem handle their sudden reappearance? what pressing need do we have for mammoths that overrides the risk? none.

      Eh, we don't really have much need for most of the ecosystem, either. If destroying a particular ecosystem were calamitous, we would have destroyed ourselves a thousand times over already. We don't actually need California Condors, or Nena geese, or polar bears....we try to keep them in the world because we like living in a world with pretty and nice things and animals. Personally I think having mammoths around would be very cool, nice and pretty.

      Also, getting your idea of the world from mediocre science fiction from the 90s isn't all that great.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was an insect or small animal that might escape and breed you could have a point, but we're talking about a MAMMOTH. I seriously doubt they're going to manage to sneak off and start breeding in the wild without anybody noticing.

      and if this is celebrated and touted as "wow look how smart we are, see what we can do?!" you really think it will end with mammoths? silly person.

      like the Hermetic Law explains: all things are growing, moving, evolving. becoming more so. spreading. almost nothing is stagnant. this will start with mammoths. it will not end there if it gets off the ground.

    14. Re:before you do it by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      I and my marauding hordes of test lab animal liberators will let the mammoths loose on the modern world one dark night. Run like the wind and be free, FREE, Manny! mwuhahahaha!

    15. Re:before you do it by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, and then we can resurrect and let loose saber-toothed tigers to eat the mammoths!

    16. Re:before you do it by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      If they did, it would make for one hell of a safari. Imagine hunting one of those beasts, but spears only, just like the old days when I was young.

      Anybody got some good mammoth recipes?

    17. Re:before you do it by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Good idea. That shit is hard to kill/control.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    18. Re:before you do it by blindseer · · Score: 1

      lighten up and have a drink

      Done and done.

      But then that was the plan before I read the article, I had a beer in hand before I clicked the link. Does it still count?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    19. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the oceans are big! Let's dump all of our garbage and toxins in them! What could possibly go wrong? Damn hippies, thinking about the well being of other species!

      It's all about humans. Destroy everything else. Just because.

    20. Re:before you do it by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 2

      Mimmoth infestations, on the other hand, are all-but-impossible to eradicate.

    21. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to breed a whole army of these things, then set them loose.

    22. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A. That's "clone", not "resurrect" -- unless you meant zombie cats, which I have to admit would be kinda cool.

      B1. Then we need to clone tar pits.... maybe someone at BP has the requisite expertise?
      B2. Or we could clone Neanderthal cavemen -- or just use my boss, it's the same thing.

    23. Re:before you do it by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a little different than insects or plants which invade non-native habitats. Insects, plants, small mammals, etc. all reproduce quickly, and can evade humans easily because of their small size. A few seeds fly around and suddenly there's an epidemic of kudzu, for instance.

      Mammoths are very, very large, as should be obvious by their name. They're not going to sneak aboard a cargo ship without being noticed, and then go hide in the wild somewhere and reproduce like rabbits. If anything, they probably have an even longer gestation time than elephants, which already have a ridiculously long gestation time (which is part of why they're going extinct; they can't reproduce fast enough to make up for human predation, even though it's been massively reduced in recent decades).

      I think the dangers here are non-existent. Elephants already have a very hard time in the wild; these things aren't going to get out and take over. Even if a couple of mammoths did manage to escape somehow (that'd be a massive security oversight wouldn't it?), it would be easy to find and recapture them within the 2 years or whatever it takes them to make a single baby mammoth. It'd be pretty hard to not notice a woolly mammoth running loose anywhere near humans. These animals are just going to be a curiosity, probably confined to zoos, and I think it's great that it might really happen.

      The danger is if this same technology is used to "resurrect" other, much smaller extinct species. What would happen, for instance, if they brought back some prehistoric insects that were alive when the dinosaurs were around? That really could have problems like what you're talking about, because insects (even large ones) grow and reproduce very, very quickly, but are small enough to escape human confinement pretty easily, and then be very hard to track down and exterminate once in the wild.

      Or what if they brought back the passenger pigeon, or the dodo bird?

    24. Re:before you do it by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Also, getting your idea of the world from mediocre science fiction from the 90s isn't all that great.

      I don't think that's at all fair, Jurassic Park was some of Michael Crichton's finest work.


      Wait. That didn't come out right.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    25. Re:before you do it by djtachyon · · Score: 1

      I like their Dogfish Head's 9000 year old beer recipe a lot more, and not just because it's older. You should be able to find some here and there at the moment .. it is "in season". Don't get me wrong, I just had a bottle of Theobroma, it is very good too!

      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    26. Re:before you do it by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you're getting way ahead of the plan's logical steps, the Neanderthals and the creatures that will eat them to spare us a Neanderthal infestation are my solutions #5 and #6.

    27. Re:before you do it by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      no it still could escape and breed (some one selling the sperm/egg on the black market)

      i wouldn't be worried till both gendered dna is floating around, and someone trys breeding them near a habitat they can live in, but even then im sure mammoth meat would be worth a ton and no one with any science background would stop u

      --
      warning pointless sig
    28. Re:before you do it by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Uh, yeah, because multi-ton animals with a nearly two year gestation period and which don't reach sexual maturity until a year or two later than humans are going to start spreading in the wilds of North America with no hope of stopping them. Yeah, that's not very likely.

    29. Re:before you do it by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      If our ancestors hunted them to extinction, they must be awfully tasty. I say clone away!

    30. Re:before you do it by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      As a diehard Hannibal lecter freak, I must correct you. In the novel, Lecter says, "A census taker tried to quantify me once. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a big Amarone."

      Another interesting bit of trivia is that, at the end the novel Hannibal, Lecter doesn't feed Krendler his own brain like he does in the movies. Instead, Lecter and Clarice both eat Krendler's brain before Clarice elopes with him.

      Lecter doesn't curse often, but the results are amusing when he does:
      "Your [murdered] brother Carlo must smell worse than you do -- he shit when I cut him." (Hannibal)

      One more thing - Hannibal is by far the baddest fictional antihero ever. He would literally eat that whiny moralfag Rorshach for breakfast.

    31. Re:before you do it by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      And the saber toothed tigers will eat all the mammoths.

    32. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lighten up and have a drink

      I shall have a 3,400-year-old Mesoamerican beer.

      Oh God!

      First there's the mean drunk. Then there's the horny drunk. And here on Slashdot, we have the geeky drunk!

    33. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat kudzu, so what. I'm concerned about the global warming (those flatulent mammoths did cause the end of the last ice age as I recall)

    34. Re:before you do it by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Spears... and cliffs....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    35. Re:before you do it by n_djinn · · Score: 1

      10 years ago or so some Russians found well preserved mammoth and did a little fry up. They all got a taste, not bad I hear.

      --
      I do not play in the middle of the road
    36. Re:before you do it by Adambomb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hannibal 2: The Carthaginianing

      They're crossing the Alps and this time THEY'RE WARM

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    37. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm feeling just a little depressed. Manny had feelings you know.

    38. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or what if they brought back the passenger pigeon, or the dodo bird?

      We've killed them once before and by golly we can do it again!

    39. Re:before you do it by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

      Dudes, the only beer to drink with this dish has gotta be Jurassic Amber Ales!

    40. Re:before you do it by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Don't Worry, Be Happy" is so '80's.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    41. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if they only clone one, what exactly would it reproduce with?

    42. Re:before you do it by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      by the worth someone could sell the sperm on the black market

      --
      warning pointless sig
    43. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a little different than insects or plants which invade non-native habitats. Insects, plants, small mammals, etc. all reproduce quickly, and can evade humans easily because of their small size. A few seeds fly around and suddenly there's an epidemic of kudzu, for instance.

      A few seeds fly around? And millions in Federal dollars, provided to farmers to plant the stuff. I'm not so worried about an accidental epidemic of invasive species, as much as I am about a purposefully caused one.

    44. Re:before you do it by srothroc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What about things from the mammoth? Just playing devil's advocate, here. What if it turns out that people or animals are terribly allergic to mammoth fur and it can travel on the wind? What about mosquitoes and pests -- how will it affect them, or the ones they bite after the mammoth?

    45. Re:before you do it by catmistake · · Score: 1

      The lack of humility before nature that's being displayed here, uh... staggers me.

      No hold on, this is not some species that was obliterated by deforestation, or the building of a dam. [Mammoths], uh, had their shot, and nature selected them for extinction!

      Dr. Ian Malcolm (rockstar)

    46. Re:before you do it by juliannoble · · Score: 1

      Any wine with lots of body and a good nose will go nicely with elephant or mammoth.

    47. Re:before you do it by c6gunner · · Score: 0

      One more thing - Hannibal is by far the baddest fictional antihero ever.

      Seeing as how he's a psychopathic cannibal with no redeeming qualities whatsoever, I think you're operating off a different definition of "antihero" than the rest of us.

      Well, either that, or there is something seriously wrong with you.

    48. Re:before you do it by phantomfive · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well actually, yeah, our actions are all about humans. If we decide to preserve the ocean, it's because we like having a pristine natural ocean, and because we like having fish and whales around. There is no such thing as karma; the earth isn't alive and doesn't care.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    49. Re:before you do it by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      We killed them all once, and that was with HAND TOOLS!

    50. Re:before you do it by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking if we weighted it all down and dumped it in the Marianas trench we'd probably be good to go.

    51. Re:before you do it by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Hah! you had it easy! in MY day we hunted sabretooths with rocks and sticks and we liked it!

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    52. Re:before you do it by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      I think the dangers here are non-existent. Elephants already have a very hard time in the wild; these things aren't going to get out and take over. Even if a couple of mammoths did manage to escape somehow (that'd be a massive security oversight wouldn't it?), it would be easy to find and recapture them within the 2 years or whatever it takes them to make a single baby mammoth. It'd be pretty hard to not notice a woolly mammoth running loose anywhere near humans. These animals are just going to be a curiosity, probably confined to zoos, and I think it's great that it might really happen.

      They said the same exact thing in "Escape from the Planet of the Apes". Instead of killing the proper chimp baby...the talking one grew up and caused nuclear war. I ask you...do we really need to have this happen again? Do we?

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    53. Re:before you do it by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2

      That's expected from my Slashdot foe. There are many reasons why, in the novels, Clarice joined him. There are reasons why he got off on insanity rather than cold-blooded murder. Learn to read, not just watch the movies, then come back and tell me that Lecter had "no redeeming qualities whatsoever."

    54. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      our actions are all about humans.

      Speak for yourself. Some among us actually care about the future and other living beings (and I'm not just speaking of vegetarians).

      And you're right, the Earth isn't alive. That wasn't my point. My point was that I don't believe that humans should be so selfish as to destroy everything else to achieve their pathetic goals. I'd like to do a lot of things, but I refrain from doing them because they would hurt others for no good reason.

      There is no such thing as karma

      I don't believe in karma, but prove it.

    55. Re:before you do it by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Funny

      A mammoth on a slippery slope would be very amusing to watch! Let's do it!

    56. Re:before you do it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.

      You realize you're quoting Jeff Goldblum, right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    57. Re:before you do it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      and if this is celebrated and touted as "wow look how smart we are, see what we can do?!" you really think it will end with mammoths? silly person.

      Do you think Jurassic Park was that one movie that scientists working on cloning extinct species just never quite got around to watching? Silly person.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    58. Re:before you do it by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      we try to keep them in the world because we like living in a world with pretty and nice things and animals.

      Well that and the feeling that it's immoral to eradicate a species.

    59. Re:before you do it by phantomfive · · Score: 0
      Interesting, an AC who actually responds.

      And you're right, the Earth isn't alive. That wasn't my point. My point was that I don't believe that humans should be so selfish as to destroy everything else to achieve their pathetic goals. I'd like to do a lot of things, but I refrain from doing them because they would hurt others for no good reason.

      Your desire to not destroy everything or hurt others is your own selfish desire. There is nothing wrong with that, but you should recognize it for what it is.

      I don't believe in karma, but prove it.

      Technically you can't prove anything, but you can assert things at the 99.99% confidence level. To be honest I haven't investigated karma deeply enough to see if there is any evidence in its favor, but I believe you'd first have to address the idea of reincarnation.

      But in any case, if there is no evidence, it means it has no practical effect on this universe, which means it isn't really worth worrying about.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    60. Re:before you do it by Kjella · · Score: 2

      You do realize that people lived at the same time as mammoths right? That we have cave paintings of hunting them? If they were superlethal to us, we'd know.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    61. Re:before you do it by nloop · · Score: 3, Informative

      How did this get modded up?

      There things used to be alive. If they had dire consequences on X population, X wouldn't be here today. They went extinct extremely recently. As in still freezer fresh.

    62. Re:before you do it by c6gunner · · Score: 0

      Learn to read, not just watch the movies, then come back and tell me that Lecter had "no redeeming qualities whatsoever."

      Ok: Lecter had no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

      On a separate note, I can help you find a good psychiatrist, whenever you decide to acknowledge and deal with your issues.

    63. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elephants already have a very hard time in the wild;

      I concur. Any cloned mammoths would have to be guarded day and night just to keep them from being wiped out for their ivory.

    64. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... it was actually a clever bit of product placement by the makers of Chianti? For some reason that seems a bit unsettling.

    65. Re:before you do it by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Won't someone PLEASE think of the kudzoo?!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    66. Re:before you do it by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Well, it better have an outstanding nose to overcome the stench of mammoth meat that is thousands of years old!

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    67. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your desire to not destroy everything or hurt others is your own selfish desire. There is nothing wrong with that, but you should recognize it for what it is.

      Of course it is, but that wasn't my point. I don't see how someone can think it is a good thing to destroy the environment and not care about any other living being. Society wouldn't function if everyone was like that. It's completely counterproductive.

      Technically you can't prove anything, but you can assert things at the 99.99% confidence level.

      Do you see the irony in that statement?

      But in any case, if there is no evidence, it means it has no practical effect on this universe, which means it isn't really worth worrying about.

      No evidence does not equate to no effect. It's true that you shouldn't worry about it, but you also shouldn't state that you know something when you really do not.

    68. Re:before you do it by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I think the dangers here are non-existent.

      We'll see if you still feel the same way when you've stepped in a steaming mammoth turd and it comes up to your neck, or when you come down with a nasty case of mammoth pox.

      And you don't know how it will turn out. What if they swap in some of the wrong DNA and these things end up the size of gerbils?

    69. Re:before you do it by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      then you stomp on the first batch of them and go back to the drawing board. Its not like they are whilly nilly making thousands of them on the first try. One mammoth is not going to escape and repopulate the species (seeing as we are skipping the frog DNA this time and the asexual reproduction) If they screw it up on this one, best bet is that they give up, Its not like they have infinite funding to create mammoth hordes of mammoths.

      see what i did there?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    70. Re:before you do it by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      I know I'm feeding the trolls, but here are some refutations in order:

      I hate to break it to you, but one mammoth can only overrun a fence, not an ecosystem. Additionally, a woolly mammoth will not 'hop aboard a ship', nor find an environment where it has no natural predators (we hunted them to extinction, remember?). Jurassic Park is not a warning movie, it is an action movie with dinosaurs.

      An above poster stated it best when he said that we only have problems controlling small, fast-breeding animals. Large, slow animals with 600 day gestation periods have very little risk to an ecosystem even if they were to escape the zoo/science lab that they will be created in.

    71. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd also be able to tell they'd been in your fridge by the fur in the butter.

    72. Re:before you do it by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      Stowaway mammoths? Really?

    73. Re:before you do it by DMiax · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he would be citing Crichton, the guy who penned the sentence, not the guy who uttered it.

    74. Re:before you do it by jacob1984 · · Score: 2

      I don't believe in karma, but prove it.

      What is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

    75. Re:before you do it by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      How many movies have been made about computers going apeshit and killing/enslaving everyone? has that stopped our research in computer technology?
      What about alien invasion movies? According to those, the signals we send off into space are luring aliens to come here and destroy us!
      If it weren't for people doing stuff "just cuz we can lulz", we'd still be back in the stone ages. Discoveries and progress are made by people trying stuff simply to see if they can do it.

    76. Re:before you do it by merxete · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt they could breed in the wild, no? Are you suggesting they might be cross breedable with elephants? What would you call that? An elemoth?

      Seriously, they should breed a family. And do it for a few generations. Obviously this is the next step. Can't wait!

    77. Re:before you do it by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      To be fair, he would be citing Crichton, the guy who penned the sentence, not the guy who uttered it.

      Well if you really want to get nitpicky, he's quoting (not 'citing') a blockbuster movie that assembled a convoluted set of circumstances ("Hello, Newman! I've spared no expense for everybody except you.") allowing for us to watch the dinos to run around the island and eat a few people.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    78. Re:before you do it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'll stop saying it's wrong as long as I can use it as a substitute for a T-Rex.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    79. Re:before you do it by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Of course it is, but that wasn't my point. I don't see how someone can think it is a good thing to destroy the environment and not care about any other living being. Society wouldn't function if everyone was like that. It's completely counterproductive.

      Oh, ok. Good and bad is a matter of opinion. That you want society to function and be productive is your opinion and desire. But it isn't a universal truth or anything. It isn't necessary to have a society that functions or that is productive.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    80. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Michael Crichton's books are "a warning" in that way. In our bookstore we have him in his own special section next to sceince fiction; I like to tell people it's the anti-science fiction section.

      Seriously, EVERY SINGLE BOOK is basically "Don't look at that!" "Don't touch that!" "Don't do experiments, you don't know what could happen!" and other anti-science memes. It's always "he tampered in God's domain," to quote Bride of the Monster, which was slightly better written.
        Oh and don't forget State of Fear, which argues that environmentalists sometimes say things which kind of sound like the things religious people say!

        So, you know. Stuff.

        Thus proving them wrong! Ooh, burn!

        I was glad to see that interest in the guy's books didn't spike upon his death like it does with any decent author. It's continued to fade since then. We can only hope the same for Thomas Friedman and Deepak Chopra, two other awful writers whose popularity makes that vein in my forehead bulge.

    81. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think of all the damage kudzoo is doing in habitats where it is non-native.

      The mammoths will eat all the kudzu.

      No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the mammoths simply freeze to death.

      *whisper* *whisper*

      What do you mean, "Ice Age mammal"?!?

    82. Re:before you do it by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you bothered to notice, but it didn't *start* with a mammoth, it started with a sheep. (Actually, it started with a rat or mouse, unless you count the work done on yeast cells and E. Coli.)

      This is a totally silly place to start getting scared. I'm not convinced that it would make any sense at any point, but picking this one is really silly.

      You didn't get people reacting this way when Craig Venter created a virus with a totally novel genetic code, and that would be a much more reasonable place to become scared. This is just dramatic.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    83. Re:before you do it by HiThere · · Score: 1

      One problem this kind of species WOULD have is a restricted gene pool. Maybe anyone hoping for success had better hope that they can crossbreed with elephants, or getting a breeding population started is likely to be quite difficult.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    84. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it isn't a universal truth or anything.

      Believe me, I'm aware. I've been stating such things for a long time.

    85. Re:before you do it by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      What if they swap in some of the wrong DNA and these things end up the size of gerbils?

      that just made me think of this xkcd: http://xkcd.com/758/

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    86. Re:before you do it by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      A mammoth on a slippery slope would be very amusing to watch! Let's do it!

      That's how the baby mammoths got their tusks bent.

    87. Re:before you do it by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      You didn't get people reacting this way when Craig Venter created a virus with a totally novel genetic code, and that would be a much more reasonable place to become scared. This is just dramatic.

      What code? Wikileaks?

    88. Re:before you do it by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the dangers aren't there, because it's not an animal fit for free living even in siberia now.

      but I think the number one question should instead be: is it delicious? plenty of space to farm them in siberia..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    89. Re:before you do it by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Merlot.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    90. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can it be dismissed by an individual? Yes. Can an individual know if karma exists or not without any evidence either way? I would think not. If they don't personally believe in it, that's fine, but they shouldn't pretend to know for a fact whether it exists or not.

    91. Re:before you do it by silentbrad · · Score: 1

      Who would sell mammoth sperm on the black market?

      For that matter, who would buy mammoth sperm on the black market? Not to mention enough of it to be able to produce enough embryos to clone it... and just happen to have their own elephant to implant the embryo in to bring it to term?

    92. Re:before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize our ancestors wiped out mammoth and mastadon populations the world over with nothing more than pointy rocks on the end of sticks. I really don't think we need to worry about them.

    93. Re:before you do it by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      same reason people hunt/own endangered animals, some psycho out theres has the money and desire to do so

      i wouldn't think more then say 5 people fit it, but people are not known for they're reason or resistant so who knows

      "life finds a way" after all

      --
      warning pointless sig
    94. Re:before you do it by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      The great thing is that *we* are the cure for the neanderthal infestation, since we killed them all once before =)

    95. Re:before you do it by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "One more thing - Hannibal is by far the baddest fictional antihero ever."

      Try Quinn Dexter from the Night's Dawn trilogy by Peter F. Hamilton.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  3. jaunty tune by bhcompy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I recall the time they found those fossilized mosquitoes and before long they
    were cloning DNA
    Now I'm being chased by some irate velociraptors
    Well believe me...This has been one lousy day

    Jurassic Park is frightening in the dark
    All the dinosaurs are running wild
    Someone shut the fence off in the rain
    I admit it's kind of eerie

    But this proves my chaos theory
    And I don't think I'll be coming back again
    Oh no

    I cannot approve of this attraction
    'Cause getting disemboweled always makes me kind of mad
    A huge Tyrannosaurus ate our lawyer
    Well I suppose that proves...they're really not all bad

    Jurassic Park is frightening in the dark
    All the dinosaurs are running wild
    Someone let T. Rex out of his pen
    I'm afraid those things will harm me
    'Cause they sure don't act like Barney
    And they think that I'm they're dinner not their friend
    Oh no

    Jurassic Park is frightening in the dark
    All the dinosaurs are running wild
    What a crummy weekend this has been
    Well this sure ain't no E-ticket
    Think I'll tell 'em where to stick it
    'Cause I'm never coming back this way again
    Oh no...Oh no

    1. Re:jaunty tune by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Informative

      Come on give Weird Al his due

    2. Re:jaunty tune by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      I should have. My fault. Thought it was implied, but I guess that the plebes might not have listened to this particular classic.

    3. Re:jaunty tune by skine · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It seems a little strange to me that so many sciency-types tend to like Jurassic Park. I mean, yes it does have dinosaurs and a girl who loves Unix.

      OTOH: "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."

      So, in the end, the scientists are blamed for the whole thing. Not the person who decided to make it a theme park. Not the person who disabled all of the security. Not even the person whose job it was to think: "What if all of our security goes?"

      The scientists.

    4. Re:jaunty tune by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      and for Jimmy Webb, who wrote MacArthur Park , performed by Richard Harris, of which Weird Al's song was a parody. It's a metaphorical description of the tragic end of a love affair.

    5. Re:jaunty tune by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The book was a little different. The blame IMO was more on the way the rich old tycoon wanted to exploit the park for profit at any cost. The movie made him out to be a benevolent grandpa wanting to give every kiddie a stuffed sauropod.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:jaunty tune by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except the one naysayer scientist (chaos theory, the science that produces neat designs you can put on a t-shirt), who manages to give the impression that chaos theory is some sort of mathematical version of fatalism. Basically his theory seems to be that zoos are a logical impossibility.

    7. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, the person who disabled the security was an underpaid and undervalued fat programmer. Guess who do most Slashdotters identify with?
      And let's not forget the scientists were the ones who could have said "well we can't do that" when the billionaire approached them to build a Dinosaur Theme Park. And, face it, it's most likely they were looking for a grant to bring dinosaurs back to life long before Hammond approached them.
      By the way, the heroes are paleontologists, so not all scientists are evil, only researchers. See the pattern?

    8. Re:jaunty tune by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      I was going to come to your defense because of the specific /. crowd, but even Catholics cite their quotations in Sunday mass.

    9. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.

      I did like the movie, but that stuff really does get me. I mean, that people actually took that to heart. Try doing something that can really help the world with biotech, like Golden Rice, and some sophist is bound to make some argument like that. Should we? Hell yes. Next question. That 'genetics is sacred' crap really gets on my nerves. There's nothing inherently immoral about cloning or manipulating genes or whatever. We've already established that things like plant/livestock breeding are ok, doing it on a molecular level is the same thing in a different way. It can be used immorally, oh yes, just like every discovery since fire, but there is nothing that justifies some of the comments in that movie.

      Killer dinosaurs eating lawyers are great to watch, but the philosophy was awful.

    10. Re:jaunty tune by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      It's amazing to me that people watch Jurassic Park, ignore the whole premise that it was built as a theme park, and think it's a cautionary tale about the evils of cloning extinct species. Happy to quote "...never stopped to ask if we should" but not "...the pirates don't eat the visitors."

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gh4zvQfDhi0

    12. Re:jaunty tune by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

      Regardless of who the bad guy is, a lot of his books have the "science gone mad" theme. He's a great writer, my only problem with him is when he pretends to be something other than a writer, such as when he appeared before the US senate pretending to be a climate expert.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, it is quite realistic. The big boss never get caught.

    14. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not as if the people who actually did all the work and made things possible should be held responsible, right?

      Dude, we got over the notion that acting on someone else's behalf absolves you of responsibility at the Nuremberg trials. And there, people at least could claim that they were following orders, that they were legally required to carry those out, and that there would've been (possibly severe) repercussions from them if they hadn't done it. But we would have none of that, and we were right about that.

      And now you want to say that "it was my job, I got paid for it" is an ironclad defense even when "I was under order" is not?

    15. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and a girl who loves Unix.

      yes, but she only played with the GUI!

    16. Re:jaunty tune by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      Well, the big boss did get caught in the book. Haahahaha!

    17. Re:jaunty tune by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      You say that like that's a bad thing.

    18. Re:jaunty tune by skine · · Score: 1

      Let me put it this way:

      Were the scientists who created the atomic bomb responsible for the US government using it?

    19. Re:jaunty tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From wikipedia:
      His issues with the English Department led Crichton to switch his course to biological anthropology as an undergraduate, obtaining his bachelor's degree summa cum laude in 1964.
      Crichton graduated from Harvard, obtaining an M.D. in 1969, and undertook a post-doctoral fellowship study at the Jonas Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California,

      What made his brand of science fiction so interesting was he had the background and conducted extensive research. The Andromeda Strain was my personal favorite.

    20. Re:jaunty tune by mrt_2394871 · · Score: 1

      speaking with friends in different specialisms, it seems that his fiction is just that. Often I'd hear "it was a good read, but he got $MY_SPECIALISM wrong"; physics, chemistry, biology, archaeology, you name it, he'd mangle it.

      And I still don't know why you'd want a wireframe 3D VR view of a database.

    21. Re:jaunty tune by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually "Should we really do it?" *IS* a question that needs to be asked more often. And considered more carefully. I do agree that for golden rice the answer is yes, and also for high lysine corn, but those, you'll notice, are not commercial endeavors. And I really question a lot of stuff that Monsanto churns out. They seem like "bad idea" writ large.

      OTOH, the "terminator gene" does help prevent the modified genes from escaping into the general population. But *help* is the word. It may stop pollination, but it doesn't stop gene fragments carried by insects. (A rare mode, but one that has been definitely demonstrated.) But it's real purpose is clearly to prevent farmers from harvesting seed and replanting it.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    22. Re:jaunty tune by silentbrad · · Score: 1

      I hated him so much in the movie. Was so happy to see him get eaten in the book.

  4. Upon Reading the Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I raised my arms and said "YES!" but then I had doubts that it is going to happen anytime soon.

  5. I want the passenger pigeon by gurps_npc · · Score: 2
    And the Dodo. Not to mention the Florida giant beaver.

    I can do without the giant sloth, short nosed bear, dire wolves or the saber tooth tigers.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once knew a gal from Florida with a giant beaver. It was so big a Mammoth could have holed up in there!

    2. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't eat another Giant Florida Beaver

    3. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by rmm311 · · Score: 1

      The key is can we clone the Dire Straits.

    4. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I can do without the giant sloth, short nosed bear, dire wolves or the saber tooth tigers.

      LARPing won't be complete without real dire wolves.

    5. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by EdIII · · Score: 1

      the Florida giant beaver

      ahhhhhhhhhh.... Rhonda

    6. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago zoos (or aquariums) could bring back the tully monster.

    7. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Florida giant beaver is not quite extinct. You see plenty of them at MacDonald's, chowing down on Big Mac's :)

    8. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, when can I buy a pet Compsognathus?

    9. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Gaygirlie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Giant beaver, now that sounds interesting!

    10. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

      I doubt you'll find any of their DNA back in permafrost on the north pole. Feel free to go look for yourself if you think you have a chance.

      --
      I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    11. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Passenger Pigeon DNA is stored in the Smithsonian I bet we can find some Dodo DNA as well. Not sure about the F.G. Beaver.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    12. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gf had one of them!

    13. Re:I want the passenger pigeon by HiThere · · Score: 1

      But passenger pigeons went extinct because they wouldn't breed except in *large* flocks. So re-creating them as a stable species might be quite difficult.

      Dodos, OTOH, should be easy if you could get the DNA. But what would be the host mother? No current pigeon could lay that size egg. Perhaps turkeys or geese might work, but they are long divergent species, so though it might work mechanically, I'm not at all convinced about the biochemistry.

      Dodo's, however, were supposed to be delicious. Unfortunately, I believe that they bred a lot more slowly than chickens or turkeys. But you could call them "Giant Squab!", and sell them for quite a lot. (I don't think they'd need much more protection than chickens, but with their slower rate of reproduction they'd need to be sold at a large premium to be economically sensible.)

      But I doubt that it could happen. There probably isn't any good enough DNA. (Maybe someone should ask Craig Venter to do an artistic recreation?)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  6. Enumclaw Man by Seumas · · Score: 1

    If you thought the story about Enumclaw Man (Kenneth Pinyan) was terrifying, just wait until guys like that get hold of some prehistoric cloned mammals. Eew.

  7. Hmmm... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

    So who will be the lucky lady to carry for the first Neandertal born in 25,000 years?

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what the mother elephant will think when a mammoth pops out. Would the creature be accepted?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably; your mother accepted you, didn't she?

    3. Re:Hmmm... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      ....you ask of a slashdotter, shunned and banished by his mother to the basement?

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be hilarious when the baby was born 100% human. ;-)

    5. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snooki?

    6. Re:Hmmm... by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      Your wife?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    7. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbara Bush?

    8. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her name is Mary, she's a virgin.

    9. Re:Hmmm... by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Most likely. It would smell like the mother and would be an obvious newborn once the mother gets up after giving birth. I realize it's not really analagous but growing up on a cattle farm we had a number of times where a mother which lost a calf would take on a new calf (after a bit of encouragement), so even without it being considered it's own initially (which it is), the baby would be able to be mothered all the same.

      Of course, we are worrying about a mammoth which would be cared for better then many many human children irregardless if the mother accepts it or not.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    10. Re:Hmmm... by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      I would guess the answer would be in looking at how elephants treat their offspring when their offspring are born with birth defects.

    11. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the other hand, elephants are quite intelligent (unlike cows) and may not always react the same way.

    12. Re:Hmmm... by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      actually, I think cows can also cary human children to term, so...

      --
      new sig
    13. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who will be the lucky lady to carry for the first Neandertal born in 25,000 years?

      As I understand it, modern man and Neandterthal share so many genes that this may already happen naturally. The known physical appearance is so much like modern man that there have been projects where people with the same (known) skeletal characteristics (i.e. they look a lot like Neanderthals) have been sought out and photographed/filmed (I know a BBC documentary did this in the early 1990's, but I can't find it on internet, the closest thing I can find is this (at 2:00)), they don't look weird, they wouldn't stand out in a crowd of modern Europeans, the most distinguishing trait is the form of the rib cage, the facial features are still pretty common today (and like modern man, Neanderthals from different parts of the world and from different time periods, looked different from each other).

    14. Re:Hmmm... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      It's more than that though. Any baby that depends on it's mother for the first days/months/years of its life will do so via a fairly complex relationship. A lamb and it's mother can pick each other out of a large flock easily. If the goat gave birth to a lamb, the chances are that the relationship just wouldn't work. I assume an elephant and a mammoth are more similar than a sheep and a goat, but it would be reasonable to assume that all the physical and chemical signals might still be not quite right.

      It would be one hell of an interesting experiment though. Despite all my ramblings above there have been some well documented weird cross-species mother and adopted child relationships that have worked out fairly well...

    15. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i doubt this would be a problem in an animal like an elephant which are highly intelegent.

      if a bird still feeds its chick from a different species even though the chick is twice the size of the host birds, i'm sure a much more intelligent & social animal wouldn't neglect the mammoth because its different. especially if its different in ways that aren't considered dis advantageous (it would be bigger than its peers) the real question is if the chemical makeup of the host elephant is similar enough to support the gestation of a different species. would the host elephants body see the mammoth as foreign material and reject it?

      we are more likely to have success with the dodo as we can control the gestation environment better.

    16. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo' Mama?

  8. Pleistocene Park by Troll-Under-D'Bridge · · Score: 2

    Okay, time to be pedantic. And while the good professor is at it, why not breed some Neanderthals, sabre-toothed cats, or my personal favorite, the hugest of the post-Dinotopian behemoths, the Indricotherium?

    1. Re:Pleistocene Park by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

      This technique, I suspect, requires a pretty close relationship. You could probably manage it with Neandertals because they are very close to us, genetically, as mammoths are fairly closely related to modern elephants, but for other extinct animals where there are no close living relatives, I doubt you would be successful.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Pleistocene Park by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could do it over the course of several generations, by splicing genes in gradually. With the first generation, they'd splice in some genes, and create offspring with the closest living relative (for instance, the Indricotherium's closest relative is probably the Rhinoceros). This would effectively create a new species that's a hybrid. With the next generation, they'd splice in more of the original genes, yielding yet another new species, which is closer to the original prehistoric one than before. Repeat until you're at the original species.

      Of course, I'm no geneticist, and I'm just talking out my ass here, but given enough time and effort, I think it is possible.

    3. Re:Pleistocene Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for other extinct animals where there are no close living relatives, I doubt you would be successful.

      So we should clone the relatives to their close relatives first. Or if there aren't close relatives to their relatives, then the relatives to those first... you get the point. Basically, just give it some time, as long as there is DNA for all the chain of relatives.

    4. Re:Pleistocene Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This technique, I suspect, requires a pretty close relationship. You could probably manage it with Neandertals because they are very close to us, genetically, as mammoths are fairly closely related to modern elephants, but for other extinct animals where there are no close living relatives, I doubt you would be successful.

      Hmmm, but could you chain animals?

      Like get an emu to give birth to an ancient emu.
      Get the ancient emu to give birth to an Archaeopteryx.
      Get the Archaeopteryx to give birth to a Microraptor.
      Then work your way up the raptors until you get a Velociraptor!

      IANAPalentologist btw so my lineages may be well off. And I made-up ancient emu :)

      Also, just for fun, anybody think this is patentable?

    5. Re:Pleistocene Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "why not breed some Neanderthals"
      I take it you've never visited the American southern states.

    6. Re:Pleistocene Park by G-forze · · Score: 1

      Because we all know both birds and dinosaurs "give birth". Right?

      --
      "There's someone in my head but it's not me." - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
    7. Re:Pleistocene Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One big issue is that even though all the genetic information can be accounted for in the mammoth, the conditions that the elephant's womb will provide will be pivotal to whether this works. Organisms and cells are not self contained, particularly during development, they rely on signals from other cells in the organism and also a number of stimuli from their environment to grow correctly. I'm not sure about mammoths and elephants, but its a bit of a hallmark of mammals that hormones and nutrients are controlled and supplied in precise quantities to the developing embryo. Kangaroos for examples, change the content (hormones, nutrients, vitamins) of the milk in their mammary glands (and thus their teets that the baby is feeding off) as the baby grows.

    8. Re:Pleistocene Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This technique, I suspect, requires a pretty close relationship. You could probably manage it with Neandertals because they are very close to us, genetically, as mammoths are fairly closely related to modern elephants, but for other extinct animals where there are no close living relatives, I doubt you would be successful.

      But wouldn't it be possible to build this chain of close relationships one link after another? Say you have got a modern animal A and two extinct animals B and C. A is too modern to carry C but can carry B. Therefore we use some animals of type A to breed animals of type B. If B is now related enough to C we can use them in turn to breed C. In other words we would work our way down the chain of relationship. Would this be possible?

    9. Re:Pleistocene Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This technique, I suspect, requires a pretty close relationship. You could probably manage it with Neandertals because they are very close to us, genetically, as mammoths are fairly closely related to modern elephants, but for other extinct animals where there are no close living relatives, I doubt you would be successful.

      It would be reverse evolution. If you want a species back, you have to clone all ancestors until you get close enough to a relative of what you want.

    10. Re:Pleistocene Park by vbraga · · Score: 1

      Of course, I'm no geneticist, and I'm just talking out my ass here, but given enough time and effort, I think it is possible.

      In short, you know nothing about a subject besides what you learned in a sci fi movie but you "think it is possible."

      Have you ever tried a career in management? :)

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    11. Re:Pleistocene Park by silentbrad · · Score: 1

      I saw a show on the Discovery Channel in which a geneticist talked about some of the genes he'd found (and been able to manipulate) in chickens. Can make them grow teeth, give them scales rather than feathers, arms rather than wings, a long tail. And then the guy doing the voiceover talked about making the same changes to an emu or ostrich to bring back velociraptors.

  9. I say blaze ahead fearlessly. by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Cause they might be yummy!

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:I say blaze ahead fearlessly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like elephant, it wouldn't be a viable food source. 600 day pregnancy?! Holy hell, we're lucky elephants aren't extinct.

    2. Re:I say blaze ahead fearlessly. by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some specimens were preserved well enough for people to try to take a bite. Most accounts of this are dubious at best but a few more credible accounts of having eaten mammoth flesh described it as being quite nasty. This is to be expected of a carcass that has been sitting frozen and half rotten in the Arctic since the last ice age. Now supposing that we found a few cell nuclei that looked good, the most likely outcome would be several hundred failed attempts if prior cloning experience is any indication. Genetic damage could in principle be corrected to a degree by hybridizing the broken strands with a very closely related species (in the case of dinosaurs it would be bird DNA; Ostriches to be specific, not frogs as was suggested in the Jurassic Park movies)

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    3. Re:I say blaze ahead fearlessly. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Our ancestors certainly thought so - I'm pretty sure they ate them all.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:I say blaze ahead fearlessly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These old scrolls say,"They taste just like chicken."

  10. Chicken by joeme1 · · Score: 1

    I just hope it doesn't taste like chicken. I'm imagining something along the line of moose, only older and freezer burnt.

    1. Re:Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be big enough that even Palin won't miss.

  11. YaBaDaBaDoo by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excellent. I could use a baby mammoth to help with the dishes.

  12. Obligatory... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eh...It's a living.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  13. A Modest Suggestion by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

    Know what would be cool? Create a new park in northern Canada and release some mammoths there.

    They would, of course, need enough forage. But once they begin to thrive, bring back sabor tooth tigers to control the mammoth population.

    It would beat polar bear watching in Churchill all to hell.

    1. Re:A Modest Suggestion by PatPending · · Score: 1
      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    2. Re:A Modest Suggestion by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      I expect that a wild self-sustaining population would require an immense amount of land. Like Nunavut

      And I doubt that they would adapt to California politics and life style. Everyone know elephants are Republicans.

    3. Re:A Modest Suggestion by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      Know what would be cool? Create a new park in northern Canada and release some mammoths there. They would, of course, need enough forage. But once they begin to thrive, bring back sabor tooth tigers to control the mammoth population.

      Cool idea overall, but the sabre-toothed tiger part is unnecessary. The most effective predator of the woolly mammoth is still available.

      -=Steve=-

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    4. Re:A Modest Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robert Pollard may suggest Mammoth Caaaave

    5. Re:A Modest Suggestion by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Naw, she's too busy running for President and taping her reality show.

    6. Re:A Modest Suggestion by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      But once they begin to thrive, bring back sabor tooth tigers to control the mammoth population.

      Once they begin to thrive, open a hunting season on them.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    7. Re:A Modest Suggestion by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 2

      She couldn't hit the broad side of a ... well, mammoth.

    8. Re:A Modest Suggestion by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But they have to hunt on foot. And they can only use fire and spears with flint heads for weapons.

      You know. Old school.

    9. Re:A Modest Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bow season.

    10. Re:A Modest Suggestion by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      And I doubt that they would adapt to California politics and life style. Everyone know elephants are Republicans.

      Well, that 's the clean-cut kind of elephant. I'm not sure I've ever described a Republican as "wooly".

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    11. Re:A Modest Suggestion by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Give em to the libertarians, seeing as wookies are in short supply.

    12. Re:A Modest Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But she could get broadsided by TERRY TATE!

    13. Re:A Modest Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I expect that a wild self-sustaining population would require an immense amount of land. Like Nunavut

      Or, as it says on that page,
      ug zg gxk igdt hqut qfr tfztk zit tbztflogf /ygglztk

    14. Re:A Modest Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. She just inspires others to deniably handle that side of things ;)

      [I would add "<ducks and runs/> but someone might start shooting at the duck too.]

  14. Now we'll find out.... by crhylove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If my theory is right and there is an ingredient in Mammoth meat that makes our species sane!

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  15. First step by MrQuacker · · Score: 1
    We can safely clone an animal that has been extinct and frozen for thousands on years.

    Soon we will be able to put our heads in cryofreeze and become slow time travelers to the future.

    1. Re:First step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you were joking or not, but if you weren't then I'd like to say that cloning=/=suspended animation. Genetics are only a small part of being a unique human being, you can't clone experiences.

  16. Imagine! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Two all mammoth patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Imagine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two all mammoth patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun!

      Ovens are going to have to get a hell of a lot bigger
      roast leg of mammoth anyone?

  17. Undoing past wrongs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's been a strong belief for a long time that we were responsible for the extinction of Mammoths. We definitely killed off many species like Dodos but we may have killed off most of the megafauna near the end of the last ice age so we may be able to undo some of the damage we have done. Outside of the cool factor there is a legitimate argument to be made for bringing them back.

    1. Re:Undoing past wrongs by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I brought you into this world so I can kill you. Only, in reverse.

  18. Have a drink? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we'll start seeing pink mammoths too?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Have a drink? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Does this mean we'll start seeing pink mammoths too?

      Bartender, I'll have another . . . and don't worry, the pink mammoth is driving . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  19. Cloned/canned Woollies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In all probability, the mammoths were really stupid, but very tasty.

    We almost wiped out their cousins, the Buffalo, too. Ever had a Bison burger? Tasty!

    We finally figured out that the third cousin of Mr. Mammoth, the cow, needed to be conserved and grown en mass.

    So, McWooly's should have been available by now. At least we have something to look forward to if the cloning works!

  20. Interesting Story Order by high_rolla · · Score: 1

    I find it quite interesting that this story comes straight after one that refers to insects and Jurassic Park.

    Coincidence, I think not.

    --
    Ryans Tutorials - A collection of technology tutorials.
  21. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this going to destroy our perception of the phrase, "Mammoth tits?"

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Yes, since the number of women with that body hair disorder and large tatas are in short supply.

  22. What about gut bacteria/etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like most large mammals are just that mammal and nothing else. We have gut bacteria and any other number of symbiotic entities living within us. We also get part of our immune system from breast milk (I assume this is the case for most mammals and not just humans). I wonder how they have addressed these issues.

  23. Finally, a bit of serious advice on Slashdot by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    lighten up and have a drink

    What do you suggest, with a lightly braised mammoth steak? A Montepulciano? Aperole with champagne before the meal? And a good calvados afterwards? I am looking forward to seeing mammoth on the menu in my local restaurants!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  24. the secondary problem by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Funny

    once the mammoth is revived, how do we keep Sarah Palin from shooting it?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the secondary problem by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      As elephants, they're obviously all Republicans, so, no worries!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:the secondary problem by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hide him in a library.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    3. Re:the secondary problem by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Harry Whittington.

    4. Re:the secondary problem by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Oh come on! Whittington has already apologized! What more do you want from him?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:the secondary problem by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      We want him to finish the job damnit! It's inhumane to leave a wounded beast alive.

    6. Re:the secondary problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once the mammoth is revived, how do we keep Sarah Palin from shooting it?

      That's simple: give her a loaded gun and point her at it. Then laugh as she misses because her huntin' shootin' "Grizzly Mama" image is as fake as was George W. "afraid of horses" Bush's cowboy rancher image. It's all bullshit invented by campaign liars -- excuse me, managers -- to sell these empty suits to the hicks. And as part hick, I find it offensive.

        (I don't vote anymore, it just encourages the bastards. Did you ever notice that dictatorships are huge on voting? They make a big deal out of it for the exact same reason: it gives them an illusion of legitimacy; the appearance of consent.)

    7. Re:the secondary problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many shots could she get off at a charging mammoth? Could be interesting.

  25. I've heard this before... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    This is what we in the REAL world like to call a 'bad idea'.

    Didn't anyone see Jurassic Park?

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    1. Re:I've heard this before... by PatPending · · Score: 1

      This is what we in the REAL world like to call a 'bad idea'. Didn't anyone see Jurassic Park?

      This is what we in the /. world like to call "+1 unintentional irony" -- you realize that Jurassic Park wasn't REAL, right?

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    2. Re:I've heard this before... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those gentle herbivores could really wreak havoc!

    3. Re:I've heard this before... by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. G'damned sumbitches fornicating and crappin' on my lawn!

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  26. Brilliant reality show idea! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    So who will be the lucky lady to carry for the first Neandertal born in 25,000 years?

    Actually sounds like a good idea for a reality show, when Charlie Sheen gets whored out . . . two and a half Neanderthals!

    But, I guess, most women folk already have experience with living with Neanderthals.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  27. Possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help but wonder if an african elephant will be capable of giving birth to a mammoth. How big are mammoth offspring relative to those of african elephants? Will they have to perform a C-section or somesuch? If they manage to pull it off though... awesome.

  28. Right on Time for the New Ice Age by isochroma · · Score: 0

    Right on time for the new Ice Age. We're gonna need these guys to provide meat on the hoof during the coming cold spell.

  29. a drink and a sandwich by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

    Who knows maybe Mammoths are really tasty?

  30. Dino-Rider by Decessus · · Score: 1

    How can this be anything but awesome? Soon they will bring back the T-Rex, I will be able to outfit it with a missile and laser platform and then I will change my name to Krulos and conquer the world.

  31. Unlikely by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    It would be like a baboon giving surrogate birth to a chimpanzee. Their gene pools are different enough to prevent gestation, even using an elephant ovum to contain the mammoth's DNA to allow mitochondrial DNA compatibility.

  32. Cenozoic Park by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    They're not going to sneak aboard a cargo ship without being noticed, and then go hide in the wild somewhere and reproduce like rabbits.

    Good grief, Hollywood execs are looking for plots anywhere they can find them. Now you've given them the plot to Cenozoic Park!

    1. Re:Cenozoic Park by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Actually, that's Cenozoic Park 2. In the first one, the mammoths will be on an island, terrorizing a group of tourists or visitors. Why mammoths (being herbivores) would terrorize anyone, I don't know, but I'm sure Hollywood will come up with some weird explanation for that. Maybe something about some saber-tooth tiger genes getting in there accidentally, creating vicious saber-tooth mammoths.

    2. Re:Cenozoic Park by gnola14 · · Score: 1

      A film about blood-lust, gigantic, woolly beasts with huge razor-sharp tusks seeking to kill everyone? Sign me in.

  33. Good luck by estitabarnak · · Score: 2

    Modern cloning techniques don't have a fantastic success rate (~10% last time I checked; 30% from TFA). Even then, there doesn't seem to be an excess of surrogate mothers (African elephants, in this case.) Even harvesting the necessary eggs from the African elephants is tricky -- it's an invasive procedure, and operating on something the size of the elephant is no easy task.

    Even assuming that all goes well, cloned animals are known to suffer from compromised immune function and generally short lifespans. Many of these problems are an effect of the cloning process and any offspring will not suffer the effects (as we've seen with some sheep). However, given the size of the Mammoth, I can imagine it taking no less than a decade to reach sexual maturity (as with African elephants). Even then, to avoid some of the detrimental effects of the cloning process, you'd also need a Mammoth of the opposite sex...

    In short: While it's cool and technically in the realm of possibility, there are still a tremendous number of sizable hurdles in the way.

    1. Re:Good luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short: While it's cool and technically in the realm of possibility, there are still a tremendous number of sizable hurdles in the way.

      hurdles easly jumped by a creature the size of a wooly mammoth!!!!

    2. Re:Good luck by Animats · · Score: 1

      cloned animals are known to suffer from compromised immune function and generally short lifespans.

      The technology has progressed. Some cloned sheep have already lived beyond the decade mark. As a demo, Campbell recently cranked out four more copies of Dolly, the sheep.

  34. Hilbert's epitaph by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    Wir müssen wissen.

    Wir werden wissen.

    It's going to be done, because we're human beings, and that's what we do. Deal with it, and get over it. And pass the steak sauce.

  35. But Should We? by Bruha · · Score: 2

    The major thing that comes to mind is that were bringing a creature back when it's native diseases now have 100k+ years of evolution on them. They'll have to keep it in a bubble.

    Then again it seems a dwarf species existed until around 1700BC.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woolly_mammoth

    1. Re:But Should We? by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      The Native Americans have stories from the around about 14 or 1500's in which they hunted woolly mammoths. In at least one story, it was another mini-ice age, and the tribe was starving from the long winter. They set out to find something to hunt, and killed what is most likely a woolly mammoth. Considering how efficient the Indians were in using the dead animals, there is no doubt we would never find any evidence of this.

  36. Re:Hmmm... not extinct at all... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Just go downtown and have a look around. Neandertals are not extinct at all...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  37. Re:Obligatory Dr. Ian Malcolm quote by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its okay. If elephants get wiped out we can wait a few centuries and then implant elephant embryos into mammoth's so they can get their revenge.

  38. Please Prof. Iritani... by UBfusion · · Score: 1

    Please, please, pretty please, with a lychee on top, can you also create a female mammoth and a Scrat so we get a full Ice Age sequel?

  39. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should only do it if they can modify it so it has extra legs and glows fluorescent green in the dark!

  40. Re:Obligatory Dr. Ian Malcolm quote by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

    You don't know how cloning works do you? They're cloning a mammoth, not the bacteria they found in a frozen mammoth.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  41. How is Jurassic Park not a tag? by labeth · · Score: 1

    It might avoid the 10,375 people coming in here and replying with OH MY GOD DID YOU SEE JURASSIC PARK, anyway. Yes, internet. I am fairly certain that a few people did see that movie.

  42. great post haffow.com by sanjananb · · Score: 0

    nice article...i love it....\ lovely internet talk http://haffow.com/

  43. My prediction... by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    Unless they keep it in an hermetically sealed tent it'll be dead to one of the common disease it has no immunity to within weeks if not days.

    Stupidest idea ever.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:My prediction... by Frnknstn · · Score: 1

      Unless I am misinformed, most antibodies are transferred to the young mammal from the mother during pregnancy. The mammoth will have many of the same immunities that that mother elephant did.

      --
      If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
    2. Re:My prediction... by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      not necessarily. IIRC, it'll get antibodies from the surrogate elephant mother during gestation, which'll get it through until it manages to produce its own.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    3. Re:My prediction... by ShnowDoggie · · Score: 1

      In general you are correct. And the immune system learns as the animal grows. So the hairy elephant will be fine. Unless it gets to hot or gets too attracted to a feisty buffalo!

  44. Fiction. by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    You do realise Jurassic Park was fiction, not a documentary right?

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  45. Re:Obligatory Dr. Ian Malcolm quote by Andtalath · · Score: 1

    Because there are abundance of diseases in genes which spread outside the host?

  46. new meat afther they finish eating whales by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 2

    The Japanese are rapidly going through the earths supply of whale meat. I guess they just want something to replace that by the time whales are extinct.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  47. Simple, we shave them by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Geez, people are already highly allergic to the hairs of some caterpillars. Tiny catterpillars that turn into flying animals that are hard to control. This is a big elephant. If it is a problem, we eat it. We did it before, we can do it again.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Simple, we shave them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that turn into flying animals that are hard to control.

      I saw a peanut stand,
      Heard a rubber band,
      I saw a needle that winked its eye.
      But I think I will have seen everything
      When I see an elephant fly.

      I saw a front porch swing,
      Heard a diamond ring,
      I saw a polka-dot railroad tie.
      But I think I will have seen everything
      When I see an elephant fly.

      I seen a clothes horse he r'ar up and buck
      And they tell me that a man made a vegetable truck
      I didn't see that I only heard
      But just to be sociable I'll take your word

      I heard a fireside chat
      I saw a baseball bat
      And I just laughed till I thought I'd die
      But I'd been done seen about everything
      When I see an elephant fly.

      -- Ned Washington

  48. Re:Hmmm... not extinct at all... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

    Neanderthals are believed to have had larger brains and better tools than our contemporary ancestors. You do them a great disservice, sir, by comparing them to the worst of our existing population.

  49. Proposed name for the first born by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about naming the first one born Aloysius Snuffleupagus?

    http://www.sesamestreet.org/onair/characters/snuffy

  50. Space saving... by jamesh · · Score: 1

    This could be a real space saving measure. No need to keep a viable population of every species. Just a few breeding pairs and enough genetic stock in the freezer to ensure diversity should we ever want a population of the animal around again. And we don't need to keep every species around either, just the ones compatible enough to breed the rest.

  51. Re:Obligatory Dr. Ian Malcolm quote by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What bacteria will come from this animal that haven't been around since they are extinct?

          Dude, the spontaneous creation theory for life went out of fashion around the time of Pasteur. The only bacteria this mammoth will possess are ones that are present in our world today. While the mammoth's own micro-environment will no doubt favor the growth of certain specific bacteria as part of its normal flora, it will be no more dangerous than turtles and chickens which carry Salmonella sp (responsible for typhoid, amongst other things), or armadillos which carry Yersenia pestis (responsible for bubonic plague aka black death).

    While having your back scratched regularly by an armadillo is not a good idea, the presence of the pathogen in the environment does not automatically mean epidemics. There are a couple cases of bubonic plague even in US every year, FYI.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  52. MMMmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmm mammoth steaks...

  53. When he does it it will be news. Not before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he does it it will be news. Not before. At the moment it is just fantasy.

  54. Pleistocene Park Not Likely by Dr+La · · Score: 1

    Those commenters who come with remarks suggesting the creation of a Pleistocene Park: in order to do so, you not only have to bring back some of the animals (such as mammoth in this case), but also the ecosystem/biotope in which they lived. And there's a snag: that ecosystem is extinct as well.

    There is no place on earth today, not in the arctic either, which has the ecosystem/biotope corresponding to the Late Pleistocene "Mammoth Steppe". Our Holocene cold steppes and tundras are decidedly different in plant biomass and ecological structure.

    In fact, that (and not human hunting) is likely why mammoths and whooly rhino, as well as a number of other Pleistocene animals that roamed the Mammoth Steppe, became extinct. Their biotope got extinct.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
  55. Go step by step. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Restore something closer to current animals, but in the same lineage
    as your target, repeat as required getting closer to the target. Hey, it's
    a thought!

  56. Not worried about mammoths ruling the world, but.. by guttergod · · Score: 1

    ... but what about microbiology?

    I guess one of 3 things could happen:

    • Mammoths are poorly adapted to the evolved microbiology in the modern world, so it dies.
    • Mammoths have some weird immunesystem causing viruses/bacteria mutation and we end up with a deadly epidemic of mammoth-flu.
    • Nothing.

    :)

    --

    Apple built a platform for their ideas, Google built one for everyone's.

  57. next stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my God. Do you know what this is? This is a dinosaur egg. The dinosaurs are breeding.

  58. Might not even live for hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess many people underestimate the dependency on living relatives. Most mammal species depend heavily on the mother; she has to transmit certain bacteria to "start the digestion engine". Often the baby will be infected during birth or will eat the feces of the mother shortly after being born. And think about the milk and the immune system.

    Thus even if the scientist manage to reproduce Mammoth babies chances are it will die within hours. Maybe the elephant mother's microbacterial flora will suffice but I doubt it.

    This is the reason IMHO we will never see any living dinosaurs from ancient mosquito blood, because the ecological systems that allowed dinosaurs to live don't exist anymore and will possibly never come into existance again. It's not just a matter of getting a DNA into a living creature. It's about recreating the microbiological enviroment from scratch and maybe the whole ecological pyramid on top of that before a Velociraptor baby will even begin to eat.

    (Sorry about my english)

  59. Been waiting for this one by dlsso · · Score: 1

    A little disappointed to see that it's just some guy who wants to try, rather than someone having successfully navigated the damaged tissue hurdles.

  60. Worst. Book. Ever. by mangu · · Score: 0

    Jurassic Park was the only book I threw in the trash can immediately after reading. It was nothing but a long, boring, anti-science rant.

    Michael Crichton somehow got a notion of the mathematical theory of chaos in non-linear systems and assumed chaos is everything, therefore science can never get reliable results.

    That's the fossilized DNA of Frankenstein that Crichton injected in a 20th century disaster film cell. The combination of two pieces of shit will never smell like roses.

  61. Food source for polar bears! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the reduction in ice is making it difficult for polar bears to hunt seals.

  62. Moral side ? by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    I'm not in animal rights or whatever, but this reminds me of star trek episode where the picard is data's lawyer.
    The science behind this will probably be/is great, and people should probably master it, but I see people discussing this as these things would serve as an entertainment for us, and no one mentioned is it moral/ethical to bio-engineer extinct species so we can put it in zoo and take our kids to see it.

    After all, if this succeeds, those mammoths will be living things.

    I was just wondering.

  63. Re:Obligatory Dr. Ian Malcolm quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, the DNA may contain viral information. i dont think that such data can result in the formation of viable viral agents, but still, this is messing with the unknown, i hope they think this out.

  64. "The Way Things Work" by Anonymatt · · Score: 1

    Remember that great "The Way Things Work" book with all the nice illustrations and cute wooly mammoths?

    Live-action TV series.

  65. Next step: Mimmoths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! Once we have mammoths, we can begin miniatuising them through selective breeding

    Unfortunately, the 600 day gestation means I won't get a Mimmoth or Zorgophant much before my 200th birthday =-(

  66. Mammoth Burgers??? by gpronger · · Score: 1

    I've considered the demise of these critters, and though there is evidence that climate change was part of the problem for them, it does appear that human hunting also played a large role. Now, that's the part I find most interesting, if you were a primitive hunter, why would you go after something that could easily squash you like the proverbial bug??? Only one decent answer to this puzzle; they must have tasted GREAT!! Who want's to join my investors for the First American Mammoth Burgers and Bar???

  67. Dr. Ian Malcolm's take on this. by r0n0c · · Score: 1

    "The lack of humility before nature that's being displayed here, uh... staggers me." - Dr. Ian Malcolm