Create an "full" package that includes the source and licensce it for extra $$. Anyway for products of the VP pricepoint it would not be strange to deliver the sources with the product.
To prevent misunderstanding i think a next name might me "microsoft documents" an d "microsoft computer"to prevent the misunderstaning that "our" company is the owner of the software (they only license it)
You might also have noticed the content of all the sites is nearly identical. Just a rewrite of the ati press kit is suppose. They all miss benchmarks (the whole purpose of sli is speed).
1. Linux developers use a model for distributed development. 2. mcVoy comes up with a Software tool to support it 3.. profit... BUT... 4. tridge comes up with a reverse engineered BK. 5. ??? 6. Mcvoy: Profit is the answer!
That is the problem. If you want do defend yourself you might want to hire a lawyer, who is more expensive than the settelement the bsa might offer to a typical file-sharer.
Well speed and better performance is always promised in the next version(preferbly the unstable version). However as a side effect the developers decide they have to loose backward compatibility.
I lost track of the number of upgrades that made freenet loose a lot of data.
Until they decide that freenet is backward combatible (a goal they are going to loose again) i think freenet will not grow.
Microsoft Operating Systems are used daily in environments where it really isn't useful to display large blue screens with technical error information.
like POS/ and ATM cash machines? Maybe they should run real embedded OS instead of Windows NT4.0.
Why wasn't this mentioned before. Hijack this is the prefrerred way of scanning for adware/spyware in most online fora (forums? excuse my englisch) . It manages to find most(if not all) software that start up.
The only thing it does not find are rootkit things(yes, ther is spyware with rootkit behaviour!). There is very little software to find the rootkit in windows land.
Recent test show that even the best signature based anti spyware toosl only find 90% of de bad software. MS antipy and hitman pro (last is a combination) are among the best and free(as in beer).
One would agree with you... until you get on the list and discover it is very hard to get off this list. Then you discover you are not dealing with policy's setup up according to their anti-spam department.
Is it certain that open source software is always the best use for our kids? always? without fail and no MS ever again?
If the target is to make the student to prepare to work for business you might want to consider having Ms-word on you skill's list. You can use O.source software to do a lot of jobs, but you don't find it in regualr business a lot.
Big company are still using windows NT4 (banks even use some OS/2). It will take some time before open software becomes mainstraim.
You got the mechanism right, it's all about trust. And the signing is nothing more than an advanced checksum. But the point is probably that they bought a key from thawte or verisign for $$$ so that users that download ther executable(with internet explorer) are assured they downloaded an unmodified executable.
Now only one person got the "root certificate". I think that a second person who is thrusted better has thei key as well, in case this singe person gets hit by a bus. Sending the key in a closed envelope (or a digital equivalent of this) to a second trusted person should do the trick. If you do not trust members of your project with this, (for forking or policy things), you should not trust them modifying the source and possibly releasing it. They have always the option of buying a new root certificate and make fork of the project.
Slashdot Mirror
The price of this thing is high... what else can you buy for $1031 (when bought by 1000 pcs)
I prefer white paper anyway to print my ditital photo's on anyway. No need for colored paper.
Create an "full" package that includes the source and licensce it for extra $$. Anyway for products of the VP pricepoint it would not be strange to deliver the sources with the product.
Java gives you a polished floor on which you can slip and break your neck.
No problem there. You just let the garbage collector sort it out.
When the pace of technological advancement reaches zero
Wrong... 17 years after that! And at that moment they will switch to copyright & trademark infringements.
you need opengl for most of them. Will ps3 have an good open gl implementation? doubtful...
but i cannot tell you.
the whole point of mac os is that it is easy and stable. Both will be lost on a hack solution.
The problem start when the robots self replication actulally works and decides it needs to recycle humans to replicate.
To prevent misunderstanding i think a next name might me "microsoft documents" an d "microsoft computer"to prevent the misunderstaning that "our" company is the owner of the software (they only license it)
and the change to that happening random is far less then 1 to 26^7
You might also have noticed the content of all the sites is nearly identical. Just a rewrite of the ati press kit is suppose. They all miss benchmarks (the whole purpose of sli is speed).
Here is a list of some more sites:
beyond3d
techreport
tweakers.net (dutch, but the content is identical to other sites
the faq from ati
Next in line: these same sites (i left anand tech and tomshardware out) will bring the benchmarks all the same day the nda on the benchmarks expires
1. Linux developers use a model for distributed development.
2. mcVoy comes up with a Software tool to support it
3.. profit... BUT...
4. tridge comes up with a reverse engineered BK.
5. ???
6. Mcvoy: Profit is the answer!
IANAL,
That is the problem. If you want do defend yourself you might want to hire a lawyer, who is more expensive than the settelement the bsa might offer to a typical file-sharer.
the Internet Explorer browser, Windows Media Center, a firewall and antivirus software.
If they didn't include the first two, they wouldn't need the last two.
The horror if all that software was on the server.
The water mark helps for tracking the copies. That is after the fact. This extreme security, drm to the limit, is to prevent theft.
The only use i can think this is for is for limited releases, like the previews for the oscars. Not for ordinary home use i would think.
Well speed and better performance is always promised in the next version(preferbly the unstable version). However as a side effect the developers decide they have to loose backward compatibility.
I lost track of the number of upgrades that made freenet loose a lot of data.
Until they decide that freenet is backward combatible (a goal they are going to loose again) i think freenet will not grow.
Microsoft Operating Systems are used daily in environments where it really isn't useful to display large blue screens with technical error information.
like POS/ and ATM cash machines? Maybe they should run real embedded OS instead of Windows NT4.0.
I see a market for an extenede "real flush" since HD makers are not soon to change this practice. (just as they count gigabytes different from the OS)
Linking an executable that formats the C: drive would double the average IQ of /. readers.
I am not sure however if that would be funny. It would be funny to linux users...until a linux binary is linked.
No it is not. At least my norton antivirus enterprise edition 10.0 with updated signatures does not flag this file.
;)
I should be safe.
ps:
ps2: Note to moderators: this is funny, not informative!
Why wasn't this mentioned before. Hijack this is the prefrerred way of scanning for adware/spyware in most online fora (forums? excuse my englisch) . It manages to find most(if not all) software that start up.
The only thing it does not find are rootkit things(yes, ther is spyware with rootkit behaviour!). There is very little software to find the rootkit in windows land.
Recent test show that even the best signature based anti spyware toosl only find 90% of de bad software. MS antipy and hitman pro (last is a combination) are among the best and free(as in beer).
One would agree with you... until you get on the list and discover it is very hard to get off this list. Then you discover you are not dealing with policy's setup up according to their anti-spam department.
Is it certain that open source software is always the best use for our kids? always? without fail and no MS ever again?
If the target is to make the student to prepare to work for business you might want to consider having Ms-word on you skill's list. You can use O.source software to do a lot of jobs, but you don't find it in regualr business a lot.
Big company are still using windows NT4 (banks even use some OS/2). It will take some time before open software becomes mainstraim.
You got the mechanism right, it's all about trust. And the signing is nothing more than an advanced checksum. But the point is probably that they bought a key from thawte or verisign for $$$ so that users that download ther executable(with internet explorer) are assured they downloaded an unmodified executable.
Now only one person got the "root certificate". I think that a second person who is thrusted better has thei key as well, in case this singe person gets hit by a bus. Sending the key in a closed envelope (or a digital equivalent of this) to a second trusted person should do the trick. If you do not trust members of your project with this, (for forking or policy things), you should not trust them modifying the source and possibly releasing it. They have always the option of buying a new root certificate and make fork of the project.