Slashdot Mirror


What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like?

quibbs0 writes "When a new worm spreads around the world, people want to know if they are protected. How fast is it? How does it spread? A new simulation program developed by Symantec Research Labs not only has the answers, it also provides pictures."

233 comments

  1. What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny


    What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like?

    This is what a spreading worm looks like.

    ^_^

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That picture will haunt me forever.......that is just plain nasty

    2. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by pdbogen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I the only one reminded of Alpha Centauri by that picture?

    3. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Reziac · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it might look rather like a flatworm, or perhaps a leech.

      "When a new worm spreads around the world, people want to know if they are protected."

      Well, I suppose that depends on whether it's an endangered species or not.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If they were blue, I'd have figured that it was network cable and a far far scarier movie.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more Fear Factor like... particular when they have them piled up on a plate or in a doughnut.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    6. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Like a centerfold without the legs?

    7. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by rlsthree · · Score: 1

      Actually, they look more like this:
      01010101000010100010101101011110101101010010101010 101
      01010010100100101010010010100001000100101001011010 011
      01111011010110101101101011011010111010110110101011 110
      01111010110110110110110110110110101101101110101101 110
      01101110110110110101010110101101011010101101101010 110
      01111011101100110101110110110101011010101010110101 101
      01110110011010101100101101101011011011001011011011 011
      10100110110101101101101100110110111011010110111011 111

      etc.

      --
      Nunchucks don't kill people NINJAS kill people
    8. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

      Or this...

    9. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by scbysnx · · Score: 0

      I'm going to throw up

    10. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cute... but build a Xenoempathy Dome and Pholus Mutagen and they start looking like these

    11. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you get a -20% penalty for having an ID in the 500000s.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    12. Re:What a spreading worm *really* looks like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. A perfectly good boob gets desicrated.

  2. When you say spreading.... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

    ...do you mean like this?

    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  3. launching a windows executable from a link by codepunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is exactly what it looks like, a windows executable installer launched off of a web page with unknow origin.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by justforaday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Certainly doesn't help that it's on the "enterprisesecurity" subdomain either...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by OglinTatas · · Score: 0

      Geez, I was expecting an article at the link, I got a download. Luckily it was big enough I could cancel it before it completed. What if it were a 50KB worm? Good thing I run OS X 10.4. Wait, what if it were a widget? Damn!

    3. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by leuk_he · · Score: 0, Troll

      Linking an executable that formats the C: drive would double the average IQ of /. readers.

      I am not sure however if that would be funny. It would be funny to linux users...until a linux binary is linked.

    4. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by DenDave · · Score: 1

      No shit eh? I ain't gonna download an executable from Symantic!! I don't trust these folks any further than I can throw 'em!!

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    5. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1, Troll

      And then us BSD users will laugh, and slashdot will be ours!! BAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAH

      ...all three of us.

    6. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by Shisha · · Score: 5, Funny

      Odd; the simulation does not work on any of the platforms I use (OS X, Linux). So no pretty pictures for me. I guess that's because Linux (or OS X) are not "enterprise ready".

      Is it a coincidence that the only platform, for which one can get programs simulating the spread of worms, is MS Windows?

    7. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      Is it a coincidence that the only platform, for which one can get programs simulating the spread of worms, is MS Windows?

      No. Who else will it matter to, except those just trying to convert people to another OS or an admin?

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    8. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No coincedence.
      It uses native code to do simulation, just like vmWare thing.

    9. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by imipak · · Score: 1
      That is exactly what it looks like, a windows executable installer launched off of a web page with unknow origin.
      The origin looks pretty well-known to me. Don't you download software from the net? If not, where do you get your Windows updates from?
    10. Re:launching a windows executable from a link by popra · · Score: 1

      And MS Windows is also the only platform that you can get worms for. So... with these extra points for Windows I guess they are more than "enterprise ready" :P

  4. Fastest way to spread a worm... by D4MO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linking directly to an MSI file in a slashdot story.

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    1. Re:Fastest way to spread a worm... by alexhs · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's an MSIE-only worm (like most (e-)worms)

      Slashdotters ALL use alternative browsers, right ? RIGHT ?

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:Fastest way to spread a worm... by boaworm · · Score: 3, Funny

      I seem to be immune to these worms, I cannot doubleclick on the "msi" file.

      boaworm$ ls -l *.msi
      -rw-r--r-- 1 boaworm boaworm 2022400 28 Apr 17:16 SRL_Worm_Simulator.msi
      mirage:~/Desktop boaworm$ chmod a+x SRL_Worm_Simulator.msi
      mirage:~/Desktop boaworm$ ./SRL_Worm_Simulator.msi
      -bash: ./SRL_Worm_Simulator.msi: cannot execute binary file
      mirage:~/Desktop boaworm$

      Poor me, my Panther cant even get that worm to RUN... i't should be dead scared, should it not ? Perhaps I need Tiger..

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    3. Re:Fastest way to spread a worm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Just wait for the widget version to come out.

      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/08/213 1208&tid=172&tid=179&tid=3

    4. Re:Fastest way to spread a worm... by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here. People don't click the links.

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    5. Re:Fastest way to spread a worm... by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. People don't click the links.

      Unless it's marked "60mb Video."

  5. Great thing for a security company to encourage by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So, what does a worm look like when it spreads? Install this program to find out!"

    and ALT-F4 will activate "ultra mode"

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Great thing for a security company to encourage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't get ultra mode to work. Every time I try the program crashes.

    2. Re:Great thing for a security company to encourage by BJH · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your PC is having power filtering problems, or possibly it's being affected by sunspot activity.

      Try hitting your power switch once a second for a couple of minutes. That should ensure that you have no more problems with your PC.

    3. Re:Great thing for a security company to encourage by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Also feel free to tune into our "super low lag" server at 127.0.0.1

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:Great thing for a security company to encourage by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Will this "ultra mode" bring back the functionality of my 486's Turbo button? My new computer doesn't have one and I'm worried that it might be slower since it doesn't have a turbo.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  6. Appropriate packaging by PowerBert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's good to see the worm simulator is only slightly less platform independant than your average worm.

    Perhaps Symantec figure the only ones who would want to look at a spreading worm are those most affected by it??

  7. Darn Linux by SloWave · · Score: 0, Redundant


    It won't even run the Microsoft Worm simulators. I'm missing out on all the fun with worms and viruses (virii).

    1. Re:Darn Linux by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can run virii with Wine ;)

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Darn Linux by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Pretty much depends on the virus. Your average Outlook mail worm will have problems with most Wine on Linux setups.

      Of course this automatically leads me to think about how to get around the difficulties virii might encounter using Wine. Which in turn causes me stop, hit my head and shout "DOH!" because I realize I'm trying to troubleshoot a virus for proper functionality and I really have much better things I should be doing.

      You win.

  8. real plot? by moz25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting, but I would be slightly more interested in a real-time actual plot. Do they have that available as well?

  9. What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Funny

    And it's a .msi file, hence Windows only.

    How appropriate.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  10. Spreading Worm? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    You mean one that's been stepped on? It looks something like this.

    Hey, at least I'm not trying to launch an executable on you.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Spreading Worm? by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 1

      Um - that is a millipede. The legs are a dead giveaway.

      --
      "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
  11. msi by hugzz · · Score: 1
    .msi format. usefull.

    screenshots, anyone?

    1. Re:msi by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      screenshots, anyone?

      I installed it on a sacrificial Windows machine, and the results were something like this. Eww!

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:msi by HaydnH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure: http://www.jeanhaines.com/tmp/wormSim.html

      *watches website get /.'ed!*

      Haydn.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:msi by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      hmmm... 500 visits in a few hours - not a particularly high load but for a web site that gets on average 50 visits per day it makes the usage graphs a tad skewed =P

      Haydn.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  12. You want us to install a program? by mrighi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe Slashdot wants us to learn how a virus spreads by encouraging us to download an MSI executable off the home page!

    That would be like me going to the doctor and having him ask me if I know how HIV is spread and then asking me to take my pants off.

    1. Re:You want us to install a program? by technomancer68 · · Score: 1

      You mean that's not normal? >.>

      heh, ummm yah.. cuz.. umm.. yah that's never happened to me or anything.. just.. umm.. curious.. yah.. curious.. heh.. >.>

      --

      The Technomancer
      "Men of lofty genius when they are doing the least work are most active."-
    2. Re:You want us to install a program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is all those anti virus companies that sponsor virus development. Their survival depends on new worms created on a regular basis. Follow the money!!

    3. Re:You want us to install a program? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what if the doctor is female and hot???

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    4. Re:You want us to install a program? by jafac · · Score: 1

      No -
      Remember, this is coming from Symantec:

      it would be more like going to a Glaxo Marketing Rep's office, and having him demonstrate how HIV is spread, by bending you over his desk. Then charging you the $300 or so a day for the next ten years for AIDS meds his company makes.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:You want us to install a program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, where do you download your software from? Speaking as a security professional [yes, really, a household name firm pays me to do infosec], I wish the yapping smartarses here would STFU and stop screaming about such trivial issues.

    6. Re:You want us to install a program? by LegionX · · Score: 1

      Well.. it would stil be HIV even if she were female :)

  13. I saw the picture by bigtallmofo · · Score: 0

    It was just some dork opening various joke emails from his dorky friends.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
  14. Torren by spadadot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, it's not that useful this time, but I'm doing this to learn :)

    http://dload.digitalriviera.com/SRL_Worm_Simulator .msi.torrent

    1. Re:Torren by pairo · · Score: 1

      Hm. I've an idea. Gonna try to get a script that periodically (every couple of minutes) looks at new /. stories and searches for files bigger than... 5MiB?, downloads them then makes .torrents.
      Problem is, you can't use mirrors people put up, so this would work better if a subscriber did it.
      Alas, this is something I'll have to do some other day, as I'm off for now.

    2. Re:Torren by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's totally useless. It's a 404. But it's cool that you're figuring it out for next time....

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:Torren by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      So, now we not only have somewhat untrusted code from a party who profits from the spread of virii, but we've now had it repackaged by a completely untrested third party.

      I'm being ungrateful, just pointing out the ever-increasing irony.

  15. Interesting article in IEEE spectrum by karvind · · Score: 5, Informative

    On similar theme, current issue of IEEE Spectrum has article on How to Hook Worms

    1. Re:Interesting article in IEEE spectrum by notsoanonymouscoward · · Score: 1

      beyond lame. they even try to rename honeynets to "Billy Goats". Also, once worms get a little wiser about their propagation schemes, this thing is history.

      --
      I ate my sig.
    2. Re:Interesting article in IEEE spectrum by johnkoer · · Score: 1

      Man the IEEE makes everything so hard, this illustration should be good enough:

      http://www.fish-hawk.net/tips/texas/worm7.jpg

    3. Re:Interesting article in IEEE spectrum by Dr.+Noooo · · Score: 1

      After reading the IEEE article, it seems less like they re-named a honeypot, but more like they expanded on the LaBrea Tarpit http://sourceforge.net/projects/labrea.

  16. Snake Oil for sale by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me or do others see some issues with the people who provide the cure also providing the pictures documenting the severity of the infection? Symantec, for one, has already been slammed for sounding the alarms and hyping the dangers in order to elevate the demand for their product. Now I'm to trust their software that shows dramatic footage!! of these insidious worms assaulting the world as we know it.
    Next you'll probably want me to go ask the Bush camp if we should invade Iran or the Democrats if we should repeal the two term law and re-elect Clinton again. On my way I'll stop by the car dealership and see if my current car is okay or if I should get a new one just to be safe.

    --
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
    1. Re:Snake Oil for sale by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      while i agree that the antivirus companies have some dubious tactics, i dunno if this is really all that inappropriate. people studying diseases often study transmission patterns and infection rates, but we don't accuse them of any impropriety. you'd expect an oncologist to have some decent pictures of a cancer spreading, wouldn't you?

    2. Re:Snake Oil for sale by iritant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On its own I wouldn't discount what Semantec says. However, "simulations" generally involve models, and those models have assumptions. What are the assumptions in this model, I wonder? We already know that a virus can travel roughly at the speed of a disk drive's ability to write.

      It would be more interesting to see a study of computer-based virii versus biological ones. How about some real epidemiologists take a crack at it? Perhaps they already have..

      Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

    3. Re:Snake Oil for sale by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Symantec has been hitting the press very hard, this is just the latest in their ongoing attempt to convince us they dont suck.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:Snake Oil for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As geeks, to us, they suck.... but never underestimate their value to the average user, whose computer actually becomes usable thanks to them.

    5. Re:Snake Oil for sale by qualico · · Score: 1

      ...and using /. to do it!

    6. Re:Snake Oil for sale by Kz · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why the absurt .msi format, but after reading your post i'm thinking it might be a strange tactic...

      don't you have to turn down security levels on IE to see those things? if more and more content is provided that way, more people will put their browser in the 'hole-ridden' setting... and therefore will need more symantec software

      --
      -Kz-
    7. Re:Snake Oil for sale by Taladar · · Score: 1

      The difference is that doctors usually sell medication or a cure, not a preventive product.

    8. Re:Snake Oil for sale by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are considerable differences in the spreading speed and ability of different computer worms, and visualizing these is what this program is all about.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    9. Re:Snake Oil for sale by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Next you'll probably want me to go ask the Bush camp if we should invade Iran

      I suspect they'd say, "Maybe later; right now, we're already doing what we can handle in the countries where we've already intervened." They may view the world quite a lot differently than you do, but they're not utter morons.

      > or the Democrats if we should repeal the two term law and re-elect Clinton

      Technically, there's no need for any adjustments to the term law, because it was her husband who was elected the other two times.</rimshot> The more relevant question for a 2008 Clinton campaign is whether she can defeat Rice (assuming Cheney opts not to run due to age, which seems likely, although Reagan was older than was thought sensible at the time and yet won his elections cleanly).

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    10. Re:Snake Oil for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a (short-lived) trend for applying medical epidemology in the early days of viruses - mid 80's. The findings tended to be that all machines in the world would be infected in a few days. Since that didn't happen, medical epidemology dropped out as an approach ....

    11. Re:Snake Oil for sale by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      How about a major drugs company showing the spread of a nasty disease that they happen to sell medication for?

      --
      Silly rabbit
  17. *Yawn* by mattmentecky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess it's a nifty little cute program in a non-technical sense. But I see nothing more here than a program that (at least seemingly) arbitrarily places a red dot on a spinning globe biased to developed nations along a timeline where you can load up various "different worms" which frankly all look the same. I would say this is one step up from a clunky/dorky flash. It would have been nice if it was at all a little bit more technical.

    1. Re:*Yawn* by -brazil- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they look all the same to you, you didn't look at all of them. The Slammer looks radically different from all the others. Due to its tiny size and rapid mode of travel (UDP packets sent to random IP numbers), it spread extremely quickly to nearly all vulnerable systems - but only relatively few systems (those running MS SQL server) were vulnerable.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

  18. Goodbye Slashdot. by shippo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been reading (and occasionally posting) to Slashdot for years.

    However this farcical link to a .MSI file has convinced me that you are now just a bunch of clueless morons.

    Goodbye.

    1. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and all the comments mentioning the stupidity of the .msi link didn't make us not morons? everyone agrees the editors suck, but i think it's safe to say most of us don't come here for the quality articles. most of us don't even read them! we're here for the discussion.

      anyway, don't let the door hit you on the way out!

    2. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by Lothsahn · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...you must be new here.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    3. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by sehryan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can I have your UserID?

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    4. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by qualico · · Score: 1

      lol, beat me to it.

      Can you post your account on eBay?
      #56 here I come!

    5. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Geez, its just an executable.

      Anyway, digg.com is the new slashdot. You'll probably like it.

    6. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by Vaystrem · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah its not worth it its just a '6 digit id' ;)

    7. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      Can I have yours?

    8. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by toofast · · Score: 1

      How long before we start seeing low slashdot ID's for sale on eBay...

    9. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have mine. I've lost everthing in several crashes over many years, I've changed providers a half dozen times and no longer even know what my password was and it's a better ID than the one your requesting.
      I post everthing now as AC and gain more karma than anyone else by being modded down to the unwashed status.

    10. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      All this hubub over a 6-digit UserId? I wonder if I can buy a new car with mine. :-P

      --
      Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
    11. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how much they would give for mod points.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1

      IIRC, that's how this guy got his.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    13. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by xpurple · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm not sure if selling our low UIDs would be a good idea.

      --
      http://www.xpurple.com
    14. Re:Goodbye Slashdot. by diggem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not too damned long... you've got 6 digits!
      Hell, I'm a relative newbie!

  19. Agent USA by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Agent USA was the original virus simulator. It was a game for the Atari 800 in 1985.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    1. Re:Agent USA by Purifier · · Score: 1

      What a highly addictive game! Some infos about the original Agent USA game here: http://www.atarimania.com/detail_soft.php?MENU=8&V ERSION_ID=138 and there's a fan made remake for the Windows PC too: http://www.the-underdogs.org/game.php?id=3699

    2. Re:Agent USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played it in the C64.

      M.

    3. Re:Agent USA by linhux · · Score: 1

      hey, I've been looking for a windows clone of Agent USA. you're my hero! (or, you might have infected my machine with a virus, but that remains to be seen...)

    4. Re:Agent USA by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Agent USA was the original virus simulator. It was a game for the Atari 800 in 1985.

      Are you sure about that? It seems like that claim could easily go to Agent USA or Corewars (or something else entirely - Lisp hackers are notorious for inventing clever amusements (like Emacs (which probably has a Corewars-mode (oh, it does)))).

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Agent USA by gibson_81 · · Score: 1

      ... and shame on all of us who got the lisp joke =)

    6. Re:Agent USA by gg3po · · Score: 1

      I played the C64 version. I can remember that I got to the Fuzzbomb, but I never beat him.

      --
      ---
  20. Re:Don't Download it by pairo · · Score: 0

    Yegads... Informative?

  21. Under OSX it looks like this ... by rewinn · · Score: 1

    Running OS X 10.3.9, I get:

    1. "No default application specified for SRL_Worm_Simulator.msi"

    ... so I specify Windows Media Player and get:

    2. "Cannot play back the file. File format is invalid"

    [Is SRI hinting at something???]

    1. Re:Under OSX it looks like this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will need to decompile and rewrite it. Start with a hex editor.

    2. Re:Under OSX it looks like this ... by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 1

      Did you try Real Player? It works alright in Real for me. In fact it also shows exclusive footages and interviews of various worms that were invloved in the production.

    3. Re:Under OSX it looks like this ... by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      No, but OS X is hinting that .msi is a Micro-Soft Installer...

    4. Re:Under OSX it looks like this ... by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      possibly because it is a program, not a video file?
      (MSI=MicroSoft Installer)

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    5. Re:Under OSX it looks like this ... by rewinn · · Score: 1

      Ah, maybe so ... but a well-designed program, when asked to open a data file it cannot recognize, might suggest alternative courses of action, perhaps even comparing the extension (...or whatever they call it these days...) to a list of standard extensions .... at least those used by the program's own vendor.

      I can't believe that I'm that much smarter than the largest software vendor in the world ....

    6. Re:Under OSX it looks like this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're just incredibly dumb. You're not the target audience of that msi file. And on windows it would actually open fine, and if it had a unknown extension, it would also ask for which program to open it with.

      You're the moron that decided to open a proprietary installer format with a media player, and blame the media player maker because it can't use it... DUH! There's no reason why a media player should start looking for you what you should open it with. If you didn't know, there's no point in picking a unrelated app to open it (like opening a mp3 with word?), just let the OS decide for you or ask...

  22. Slammer/Sapphire by carambola5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've already see how a worm spreads. Especially one that initially grows exponentially with a time constant of 8.5 seconds. Yes, 8.5 seconds.

    Slammer

    Pay attention to the time and infected hosts data at the bottom.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:Slammer/Sapphire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Sapphire definitely took the World Speed Record.

      One tiny UDP packet, one infection. Doesn't even write to disk, memory resident pure, so not limited by disk speed. It can send at full rate of line. It infects typically servers, It's small, too small to do fancy coordinated or batched stuff, but it's still best case scenario. Not the best Mersenne Twister RNG in the world, but not bad for that few instructions.

      Work of art. They don't write 'em like that every day.[1]

      Written by a member of the antivirus industry, I might add. A little slice of the oldschool. Same author as Witty (similar oldschool focused compact design, infected BlackICE, destructive via random-sector writing).

      [1] It's just as well. If the botnet worms and mass mailers were designed that well...

    2. Re:Slammer/Sapphire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... There's a big patch of infection in the middle of the Brazilian rainforest that's nowhere near Brazilia, and another huge one in the middle of Australia, centred on Alice Springs, which has a total population of about 28000. Both of these look as if they are over-egging the pudding!

    3. Re:Slammer/Sapphire by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Wow, Greenland, Central Africa and Siberia must have really good antivirus software! Look at how few infections they've got!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  23. CAIDA did this for earlier worms... by m0rningstar · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... and in a WWW based format, as opposed to the executable from an AV company. I think it was two of their researchers -- Colleen Shannon and David Moore. The animation for Code Red is here .

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. end to end linkage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of the reasons that worms spread exclusively on Windows is because you need end to end linkage. A simplified model is if I wanted to send a message to Kevin Bacon, I'd talk to friend A who knows an actor, who talks to Friend B, then friend C, who then talks to Kevin. If I tell someone who doesn't speak the language, the linkage is broken and my original message can no longer propogate.

    In other words, a computer can only infect other computers through being infected itself (unless if the system is just serving files). Worms can't move through unsupported systems. Once it hits OS X or Linux system, it can't move anywhere. Windows is the only OS with critical mass high enough to achieve this. Symbian for mobile devices. This is why you won't see any Windows CE worms unless if it gains in terms of marketshare.

    1. Re:end to end linkage by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Worms can't move through unsupported systems. Once it hits OS X or Linux system, it can't move anywhere.

      You seem to have some bizarre picture of the Internet where hosts can only reach other hosts that they are directly connected to.

      An infected Linux box can reach all other Linux boxes on the Internet. Of course, it would take more scanning time to find them than it would if we were talking about Windows boxes. But so what?

      One Linux box would take quite a while to infect the whole Internet on it's own. But that's not a realistic scenario. Once it's infected another host, the time taken to find others halves. And so it goes on. The time taken to find other victims is not as significant as you seem to think.

      Also, check out some papers on the spread of Code Red which infected IIS servers. At the time of it's appearance there were probably more installs of Apache running on Linux on the Internet. Why no worm for them?

    2. Re:end to end linkage by daniel_mcl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another reason is that the Windows architecture, unlike Linux or the BSD core of OS X, was never designed to be used in network or multiuser settings and even now that NT-based systems are the norm the old DOS mentality prevails. A large number of the exploits in Windows are based on the ability to embed executable code in pretty much anything that should not have executable code in it -- word processor documents, emails, etc.

      It's not hard at all to find whatever flavor of UNIX system you want in huge concentrations; sites such as Yahoo and Google run huge farms of them, for instance, as do most research institutions. If one of these was to be infected with a worm you can be sure it'd spread pretty quickly.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    3. Re:end to end linkage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Kevin Bacon analogy is weak. What if people speak two languages ? I'd tell a Mexican in English, he'd tell his cousin in L.A. in spanish, who tells his actor friend in english . . . .

      Similarly, there have certainly at least been proof-of-concept cross-platform worms. Many unix worms insert source code and shell commands through the hole and compile themselves on the other side. Microsoft word macro viruses run on the Macintosh.

      Ultimately, the primary use of computers is to communicate; this means fringe platforms will either have to be vigilant in security, or be useless.

    4. Re:end to end linkage by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Then why don't we see Linux worms infecting webservers? After all webservers are much easier to find having a public domain name and all.

    5. Re:end to end linkage by pVoid · · Score: 1
      A large number of the exploits in Windows are based on the ability to embed executable code in pretty much anything that should not have executable code in it -- word processor documents, emails, etc.

      Frankly, I can't tell if you're implying that Microsoft Word makes use of undocumented kernel functions? or if you're implying that the kernel cares the least bit about the contents of a word file.

      Either way though, your assertion is just bullshit. It is true that NT didn't start out as being a network OS, but this was apparent in shortcomings such as only having one user logged in at a time. That, of course, is no longer the case since Terminal Services came to be.

      It's not hard at all to find whatever flavor of UNIX system you want in huge concentrations; sites such as Yahoo and Google run huge farms of them, for instance, as do most research institutions. If one of these was to be infected with a worm you can be sure it'd spread pretty quickly.

      Worms, by definition, do not require user interaction. Trojan horses or viruses do. A Worm is something that infects directly from the network, by sending garbage data to a well known daemon (IIS has long been a superb target for worms). Apache has serious security holes too... I know I will be rated troll for saying this, but if someone had actually gone out of their way and created a worm for an apache based system, those farms would be just as infected.

      Keep in mind the following: IIS has the very aggravating flaw that it runs as SYSTEM (on older NT versions), which Apache does not have. But in general, worms don't necessarily need to be disk bound, and thus don't require priviledges to overwrite binaries. There were quite a few worms that were completely memory bound, and still made a grand mess of the net. Apache is just as vulnerable to such worms and the network effect they would cause.

    6. Re:end to end linkage by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      It is true that NT didn't start out as being a network OS, [...]

      No, it's not. NT was going to be a "network OS" from the beginning.

    7. Re:end to end linkage by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Another reason is that the Windows architecture, unlike Linux or the BSD core of OS X, was never designed to be used in network or multiuser settings [...]

      Bollocks. NT has been networkable and multiuser from its initial design specification.

      It's not hard at all to find whatever flavor of UNIX system you want in huge concentrations; sites such as Yahoo and Google run huge farms of them, for instance, as do most research institutions. If one of these was to be infected with a worm you can be sure it'd spread pretty quickly.

      Sure, within that site. But Windows machines have that sort of concentrations *everywhere* you go, not just in a few places.

    8. Re:end to end linkage by pVoid · · Score: 1
      That depends on your definition of "network OS".

      If your definition is that it has a TCP/IP stack implementation, then sure. If your definition is that it is a multi-user network serving machine, I would say NT wasn't originally designed for that.

  26. Anyone figure out? by doombob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was wondering if anyone has figured out how to write new simulations for it. This would be more interesting and useful if you could write your own simulations with your own paramaters to test how the networks you are on would compare. I tried editing the simulations that are provided but all that is affected is the speed at which the percentages change.

    1. Re:Anyone figure out? by alecks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes you can, but you need a hex editor. Load up the exe and goto this address: 23HX,12BA... change the H to an F... This will let you literally drag and drop simulation (.sim) files in the loader and run them. I showed this to my boss earlier today and he's been busi all morning creating sim files to try out.

    2. Re:Anyone figure out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... hex doesn't include H & X in the character set... is this a joke - I have a hex editor, but am not able to duplicate.

    3. Re:Anyone figure out? by pinkUZI · · Score: 1



      actually, the screenshots in this powerpoint file show an advanced button - which is not present on the downloadable version. And, although the pdf has been deleted off of symantec's site, this link to google's cache gives details on creating simulation files - looks like it'd be cool to play with.

      The comment above, however, makes no sense at all. That combined with it being mod'd up as 'funny' means it is likely a hoax.




      --
      You are receiving this message because your browser supports Slashdot Sigs and you have Slashdot Sigs enabled.
  27. Worm didnt spread... by Inari · · Score: 0


    Couldnt view that as my firewall stopped it. :)

  28. In other news... by qw(name) · · Score: 2, Funny

    Symantec has issued yet another warning that the world will end as soon as all the worms and viruses unite against true carbon-based life forms. Symantec CEO John W. Thompson was quoted as saying, "If people would have heeded all our warnings about the coming war between reality and virtual reality we would not be headed for certain doom." At that point he started crying as his company's stock soared to record highs.

    Up next, Symantec issues a warning to the Mac/UNIX community saying that their computers are too safe from Windows-based viruses. "We can no longer support operating systems that flaunt their security in face of corporate IT managers everywhere when millions of starving children are dying of malnutrition."

    The Weekly World News news service will be right back after this message from our sponsor, Symantec. Ensuring your fear, uncertainty and doubt since 1982.

  29. They should know exactly.... by /dev/trash · · Score: 0

    Since many think they write most of them anyway.

    1. Re:They should know exactly.... by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Since many think they write most of them anyway.

      I know one thing for sure - they write software which is damn near impossible to cleanly remove from a PC. That's good enough for me.

      Ever tried to uninstall Norton 2005? There's a good chance the uninstaller will fail with an obscure error. So you go looking for a solution. And buried on their site you find a downloadable uninstaller for 2005 that actually works (partially).

      And you notice that on the same page are links for uninstallers for 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 etc..

      Do they seriously expect us to believe that there is a "bug" with their uninstaller that they haven't been able to fix in five fucking years?

      Bullshit. They make it deliberately difficult to uninstall so that Joe Average will give up and just keep renewing the licence.

      And that's just criminal.

    2. Re:They should know exactly.... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      emerge -S norton returns no results.

  30. Re:Don't Download it by qw(name) · · Score: 0

    This is Slashdot after all.

  31. Brek Girl Simulation by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like that 1970's American television ad with the cute girl who visually demonstrates exponential growth while trying to advertise something like Brek shampoo.

    "I [infected] two friends.
    And they [infected] two friends.
    And so on.
    And so on.
    And so on."

    Withe the screen splitting at each phrase and winding up with 32 versions of the cute girl, it's much more visually entertaining than this demo.

    1. Re:Brek Girl Simulation by mlmurray · · Score: 1

      Kudos on the 1970's commercial reference. At least now I know there's a possibility of my not being the oldest slashdot reader. (For some reason, I was thinking it was "Agree" shampoo, though... Well, it was a long time ago).

    2. Re:Brek Girl Simulation by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Faberge Wheat Germ and Honey shampoo.

      I remember using that stuff as it was in our bathroom- I can still remember the smell. I remember thinking 'Why the hell would you put honey in a shampoo? To attract insects?'

  32. Re:Don't Download it by leuk_he · · Score: 5, Funny

    No it is not. At least my norton antivirus enterprise edition 10.0 with updated signatures does not flag this file.

    I should be safe.

    ps: ;)

    ps2: Note to moderators: this is funny, not informative!

  33. Yellow? by SmokeyMirror · · Score: 2, Funny
    So I read the article and I find this bit here: As the worm spreads, nodes in the network and on the globe start turning colors. Symantec Yellow represents patched and secure machines

    Tell me Symantec hasn't trademarked a shade of yellow.

    1. Re:Yellow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symatec Yellow? Or Curious Yellow?

      We've always suspected they were behind the whole virus thing....

    2. Re:Yellow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They cant : Prior art claimed by direct ... uh.. color relatives - the super intelligent shades of the color blue.

    3. Re:Yellow? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      Curious Orange?

      [check the UK tv reference..]

    4. Re:Yellow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that Symantec lays claim to "super intelligent" status...

  34. From TFA by Laurentiu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Worm Simulator will be rolled out initially to members of the Symantec Sales organization for demonstrations to enterprise customers. In addition, the Worm Simulator could become a future television star during news coverage of worm outbreaks, enabling viewers to watch a virus as it spreads. Symantec Security Response intends to use the simulator for TV appearances as well.

    Translation:
    We invented a new, computer-assisted sales pitcher. It could also be used as a FUD spreader on TV.

    --
    Just /. IT
  35. Is this the reason by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

    ... is this the reason why they always hype up outbreaks?? Things are starting to make sense now ...

  36. Missing some factors by Shoten · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like they fail to take a number of things into account with the sim. For one, when I ran the Sasser simulation, it followed a pretty straightforward and accurate progression. Things went slowly at first, and then picket up speed as time progressed.

    But within 20 days, there were no infected nodes, anywhere; as someone who works in a penetration testing lab without a firewall, I really have to say that this is not real. And within 52 days, 100% of the world was patched. What? It was more than 95% within 30 days too, and I don't believe that either. There's no accounting for new systems coming out of the box (and onto the net) without patches, and no representation for the fact that there will never, ever be 100% coverage for any patch.

    That said, it is a pretty interesting tool to see how things spread, both globally and within an organization. You just have to keep in mind that it doesn't tell the whole story.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Missing some factors by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe these days the owners of the countless spamming zombies are patching 'their' windows machines ;)

    2. Re:Missing some factors by Spez · · Score: 1

      Yeah i agree. There are also some strage elements in the demos.

      Firstly, you have two demonstrations. One worldwide to the left, and to the right a simulation of a network, with each nodes visible individually.

      I ran the blaster simulation a couple of time, and (other than beeing surprised that this worldwide simulation only has 45,000 nodes instead of 100,000,00 like the other ones), saw some irregularities between the two simulations. The small network (on the right) always seems to get infected reallllly slower. In fact, the left one was 100% infected after 3 days... I don't know if 100% of the internet can actually be infected... And after 20 days, 100% of the internet was patched...

      For the other simulations, the smaller one was ultra infected and the big simulation always cleaned up...

      I know the network simulation is divided in four "companies" with different internet, firewalls and antiviruses settings, but its since we only have 1 global statistics page for the network, we cannot see easily if the "Internal Firewall" company (as listed in the helpfile) goes better than the other ones, except by looking at the picture

      --
      I wouldn't mind you in my head, if you weren't so clearly mad -Lews Therin Telamon
    3. Re:Missing some factors by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      don't you get it? this is how symantec views the world. they believe everyone is using their software. they believe that in their ideal world, that virii and worms exist, but is not a problem that can't be solved and is solvable. they believe that when such a worm gets released, their stock prices will go up and more of their software will be sold.

      they believe if you use norton av, then the maximum # of days your computer can be affected is 20days (the maximum time they forsee themselves to write a patch and spread it to customers). they're not accounting for anyone that uses AVP or McAfee or anyone that's not using norton av.

      so basically it's an advertisement saying, with norton av, you can only be affected for 20 days, MAX. so go out there and install norton av or upgrade to the newest version if you haven't already!

  37. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is an animated GIF not a virus, but it's not some scare tactic windows program by an anti-virus company.

    To keep this from being a pointless "mod up" post,
    The full article is http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/sapphire/

  38. Real data: Analysis of the Witty worm by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    /. discussed the Witty worm back in 2004. This analysis used UCSD Network Telescope IP block (containing 1/256 of IPv4 space) to sample the randomly spewed packets created by the worm. They were able to analyze quite a few interesting features, including the fact that the worm was jump-started by an infection of about 110 PCs at the outset, 24-hour cycles in infected/reinfected machines, and data on the distribution of bit-rates of worm transmitters.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  39. Speaking of spreading worms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    How timely this article!

    Today an internal customer asked me why Slashdot seemed to be broken. I check the firewall logs and, lo and behold, discover 66.35.250.150 triggered the firewall's IDS for tweaking port 2000/TCP.

    Why was /. poking at that port on my firewall, particularly considering what's usually there?

    1. Re:Speaking of spreading worms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were checking to see if you were a proxy that they should ban.

    2. Re:Speaking of spreading worms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They were checking to see if you were a proxy that they should ban.

      Most sites that are going to port-scan you "legitimately", somewhere tell you so. I checked /. pretty thoroughly and found no mention of such activity.

      I guess I shouldn't be surprised...

    3. Re:Speaking of spreading worms... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of spoofing the source address? Which makes your "IDS" a quite nice Self-DOS-Tool (if someone sends you fake pakets claiming to be from your provider's DNS server).

    4. Re:Speaking of spreading worms... by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      They are looking to see if you MIGHT be an open HTTP relay.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  40. Are you protected by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are you protected in 2 answers

    Do you understand computers and how to run one securely? Yes/No if Yes continue, if no then you arn't.
    Is a patch finished and installed? If yes then you're fine. If no then you arn't protected.

    Obviously opening strange program files comes under number 1, but they may make it three points if you wish.

    --
    I like muppets.
  41. Make the "pictures" a PowerPoint presentation... by faloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it's gonna be a marketing pitch, they should at least make it PowerPoint so the people that try to get money to buy the solutions can make it management friendly... A few slides, some small buzzwords and presto! People get funding! Makes me crazy...Crazier. Whatever.

    --
    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  42. Re:Don't Download it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! You get both!

  43. Re:What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonsense:

    wine msiexec /i msifile.msi

  44. Like most worms... by sw149 · · Score: 1

    And like most worms it's only available on Windows.

  45. You mean... by hummassa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A linux binary that could chmod +x itself, and then execute? Preferently as root, so it can open a port in the iptables firewall? :-) Yeah, I didn't think so either.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  46. Re:What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Which requires a Windows installation.

    You were saying?

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  47. It's a virus!!! by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

    Don;t open the link, it will wipe your hard drive and steal all your passwords, empty your bank account and blow up your monitor and printer...

    Seriously, this is exactly how this shit spreads - get someone to download something "cool" - one reason why I never get crack patches from the warez sites...

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    1. Re:It's a virus!!! by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      *clickety-click

      "I see nothing wrong..."

  48. an even better question: ... by cutecub · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does a spreading Worm Simulator look like?

    Thanks to the Slashdot effect, I think we're gonna find out.

    -S

    1. Re:an even better question: ... by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      I would think the /. effect is the total opposite of a spreading worm, i.e. as time progresses, more people would hit a server until the story is reposted on another day (or sometimes another hour) and the effect cycle repeats itself.

      The cycle will definitely repeats as we have that uncontrollable twitch that automatically click on any link on the front page, repost or not.

      Would be interesting to know the net total traffic generated by zombies DDOS-ing a server combined with /. effect at the same time.

  49. What does a Spreading Worm *sound* like? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Sound of a worm going through MS security after you click on an MSI installer.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  50. I really didn't know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Goatse.cx guy was called worm?

  51. Sober by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    I wish I was not. That would explain why 30% of all email is Sober at the moment. As it is now, booze is not to blame.

    Sober, installs itself by tricking naive people in opening the Trojan disguised as

    Sorta like the MSI link in this article....

    I wonder, will I get drunk when opening it on my Windows 2003 Terminal Server?

    If so, I might be inclined.

  52. battling those nasty worms yourself ! by wordslinger · · Score: 1

    well, try that one: http://www.darwinia.co.uk/ it's a game, ok. but there is a demo and if you ever wondered what is really happening when you start your fav antivir-O-mat, try it.

    --
    "The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." [William Gibson]
    1. Re:battling those nasty worms yourself ! by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 1

      been waiting for a while for this.
      and unlike the Symantec demo file,
      this games does run on Linux
      (and Mac OS as well)

      thanks for thinking about us!
      i will definitely buy it.

    2. Re:battling those nasty worms yourself ! by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Darwinia is a pretty cute little Action/RTS.

      Definately worth a look. These are the same guys who brought us Uplink!

  53. Thanks Symantec! by qualico · · Score: 1

    When Symantec software spreads like a worm from local distribution chains, ( BestBuy, Staples, FutureShop etc. ), demand for computer repair goes up.

    Why?
    Because their software breaks every machine it touches.
    Worse, the computers they are installed on have not just one Virus, but many.

    I tell my customers its like selling a condom with a hole in it.
    You could have had so much more fun without the protection they weren't providing in the first place.

    A false sense of security is worse than no security at all.

  54. Can't...restrain...self... by tjebe · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new worm overlords!

  55. mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it seems to be down, I've mirrored the simulation.

    http://thisurlissafenoreally.haxxxsukkar.cx/SRL_W0 rm_S1mul470r.msi

  56. Screenshot by HaydnH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone above requested a screenshot, I've replied above but for those that missed the reply and can't run .msi files, here's a screenie:

    http://www.jeanhaines.com/tmp/wormSim.html

    Haydn.

    p.s: thank god I'm at work so I can open .msi files!

    --
    Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Screenshot by gg3po · · Score: 1

      I'm moving to the Artic circle. Looks like they're solidly in the 'Clean' category :-)

      --
      ---
  57. Colors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could they have used a few more shades of grey? I mean, how are you ever supposed to use a visual tool if three of your indicators all look the same (white, light grey, dark grey in very small boxes).

  58. you're wrong by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    "Windows is the only OS with critical mass high enough to achieve this. Symbian for mobile devices. This is why you won't see any Windows CE worms unless if it gains in terms of marketshare."

    The Witty worm could only infect Windows machines running a specific version of specific firewall software. The vulnerable population was about 12000 machines worldwide. It infected virtually the entire vulnerable population in under an hour.

    If/when there's a worm for MacOS X or Linux, there will be more than enough machines to spread it far and wide.

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  59. Somewhat dissapointed by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I was hoping for the ability to tweak a worm's parameters (infection rate, pool of vulnerable hosts, etc) and see how the infection rate changes....no such luck i guess, this is more like an animated gif or something. Several of the worms do look alot the same but Slammer and Sobig do seem to be distinct.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  60. More stuff by coolfrood · · Score: 1

    I did some research on worms in school. Here's a report, and here's a presentation.

  61. terminator 3! by Legato895 · · Score: 1

    now we need a way to simulate skynet, pending its future release

  62. the funny thing so far by oliderid · · Score: 2, Informative

    The funny thing so far i've seen concerning worm and viruses is the Windows media center. I was looking at a new flat TV screen in an electronic shop. They were promoting the Microsoft media center. The funny thing was a little popup window at the right of the taskbar. "Windows did not find any anti-virus software on this computer." or something like. Lol...Thanks but I prefer my good old Television. Olivier

  63. What does a spreading worm look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Click this link, and you'll find out!"

  64. The title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woa. I thought the article's title was "What Does a Spreading Woman Look Like?"

    1. Re:The title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Woa. I thought the article's title was "What Does a Spreading Woman Look Like?

      Don't worry, puberty doesn't last forever. Someday, you'll be able to think about things other than sex!

  65. You Will Be Missed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck with that.

  66. According to the sim.. by cioxx · · Score: 1

    It looks like the entire continet of Africa is running Macs.

  67. Unbiased? by Shook18 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is honestly no way that this "research" by a anti-virus company could be even remotely unbiased; they are going to exaggerate the hell out of this to make normal internet worms look like ebola.

  68. speeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who read "What does a speeding worm look like?"

  69. any complex systems guy here? by ianalis · · Score: 1

    I run linux so I can't run the program. I would like to ask if the spread of a worm is similar to the spread of an epidemic and if the same technique (agent-based, cellular automata) is used to simulate both?

  70. What utter marketing BS by Ch*mp · · Score: 1

    What real purpose does this simulation serve?

    Have you ever had the sales FUD speel from a double-glazing/insurance/encyclopedia salesman?

    Well this Symantec's FUD gimmick.

    To the layman it looks pretty, it looks realistic. It's full of 'scary' statistics.

    But how does this help me protect my network? How does it make me more secure?

    Symantec are also being irresponsible by helping the worm/virus writing community chart the course of their creations. (This is documented behaviour).

    One more thing...it'll be another 'claim to fame' trophy for worm/virus writers to have their creation appear in Symantec simulations.

    Sorry, I have to cut this post short, but I must go to buy my security from Symantec _right_now_ before the world implodes.

  71. "What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like?" by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 0

    goatse.cx?

    --
    http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
  72. win m0n3y!! by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1
    Wait! Wait! I recognize this is!

    It's CmdrTaco's worm tracker program. If this worm makes it to 500,000 of your friends in an hour then Taco will give everyone it reaches $100 and send us all to DisneyWorld!

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  73. Re:Don't Download it by qw(name) · · Score: 1

    Oh dear! I made fun of Slashdot. Quick! Quick! Mod it overated!

    "When Mods Go Bad." Next on Fox.

  74. Your Missing a factor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mickeysoft doesn't distribute anything nowday's that isn't SP2.
    You might find XP in some bargain bin somewhere though.

    1. Re:Your Missing a factor! by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      There's still that XP Pro Corporate "trial" version that's making the rounds on P2P networks, too.

      No service packs, and a difficult time getting them to actually work on it if you download them.

      I know plenty of people who would think nothing of downloading and installing this on their system. Heck, I know of a few business that think nothing of downloading and installing this, then selling the system.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:Your Missing a factor! by Shoten · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried managing antivirus and patching in an enterprise of any significant size? Trust me; nobody will ever be 100% patched and covered with antivirus. Things break, people with excessive rights decide to uninstall or disable things for various idiotic reasons, developers set up systems without fully patching them...the list of reasons goes on and on, and every security geek out there has one of their own to share.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  75. Whoever posted this should be taken out and shot.. by JoloK · · Score: 0

    Thanks alot. C'mon...

    --
    JoloK
  76. Man, this sounds familiar.. by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

    As it happens, a friend of mine, (former boss) happens to be doing something very much along these lines.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  77. Hmmmm. Interesting... by SamMichaels · · Score: 1

    From McAfee...

    --snip--
    WARNING: SRL_Worm_Simulator.msi is infected with the W32/WormSimulator.B@mm virus!

    ACTION: Clean/Delete threat.

    It looks like you're attempting to run a competitor's program. Stop it, you insensitive clod.
    --snip--

    That was a weird virus warning I got when I downloaded that ;)

  78. Call me a cynic, but... by drigz · · Score: 1

    I bet that the simulation shows companies with Symantec products are vastly better protected...

  79. Other visualization tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If people are interested in another take on worm propagation monitoring and containment, have a look at http://www.intrinsicsecurity.com/.

    Disclaimer: I did some work with the folks there in past, and they are pretty sharp.

  80. Interesting to model other things? by giant_toaster · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to use this tool to model spreads of other things, i.e. progress of a new brand or a new band. You could change the model files to be equivalent to the current spread of Firefox for example, then use it to predict future downloads. Anyone know how to change the files? They look quite simple, but I don't have any way of opening them apart form wordpad...

  81. Am I the only one... by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

    What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like? With pictures?

    Sounds like worm pr0n to me...

  82. It looks like a web page linking to an executable! by wernst · · Score: 1
    Hmmmm

    Let's see. How does a spreading worm look? Perhaps it looks like users blindly downloading an EXECUTABLE program for Windows after essentially being told that "this is a safe download" becuase it is linked to from the front page a major website.

    I'm not sure whether to laugh or cry at the humor or the irony.

    If this thing is a virus that Norton has preprogrammed its antivirus product to ignore, I'll be laughing myself into an early grave...

  83. Re:What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It requires some dll's...but no windows installation. Having a windows installation is actually not recommended on the winehq site.

    You were saying?

  84. how come i can't stop the earth from spinning? by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    i hate the globe part of the program. it's bad interface imo. all the fun stuff happens when i'm stuck on part of the ocean. should've made a pause button and rotate left/right for the globe.

  85. Mac worms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do exist. Netsky and Opener, for starters...

  86. Re:Mac worms by popra · · Score: 1

    You're lying!

  87. Digital Signature??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really suprises me that Symantec would release a friggin MSI package and not digitally sign it. Without that there's no way to know if Symantec even made this.

  88. Does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After downloading, installing and running this does it popup a message in big red letters saying "THIS IS HOW A WORM SPREADS!"?

  89. Re:Mac Worms by allgood2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    First Netsky DOES NOT effect Mac OS. It can be received via email like numerous other PC viruses, but doesn't execute or cause any damage on a Mac OS X machine.

    Second, Opener/Renepo IS NOT a virus or a worm. It doesn't spread and can not self-replicate. Opener/Renepo can cause damage to a Mac OS X system, but only if the user running it has permission to run it, and grants the app permission to run and perform the damage. It can't traverse the network, spread to others machines, or run without explicit permission of the user. In that sense it's pretty much the equivalent of a user deleting their own files or running a trojan application locally.

    Obviously, if your going to write this, you could have at least spent 5 minutes getting information from any reputable anti-virus site. Symantec, Sophos, and a host of other sites, will give you the details of what OSs the virus run on,threat level, etc.

  90. Re:What Does a Spreading Worm Look Like? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    > Having a windows installation is actually not recommended on the winehq site.

    Is that due to technical concerns, or Microsoft EULAs? I'm inclined that it's more a case of CYA than anything else.

    Seriously, I've read man wine.conf(5), and I fail to see how you're going to obtain the necessary DLLs, the paths, Registry entries, etc. any other way.

    Not that it really matters to me very much, as one of the reasons I switched to Linux was because I didn't want to run Micrososft software or anything that depended on it any more.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  91. messagelabs already did this by grunby · · Score: 1

    There used to be a live virus flash animation on their site where it would show you what countries worm emails was being picked up in. On the left hand side, they had a list of big worm outbreaks and would play through the outbreak and show infected regions. Very nice demo, but it looks like it's no longer - http://www.messagelabs.com/viruseye/threats/ now brings you to their home page.

  92. OMG worms spreading on slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just some globe and a grid hardly shows how serious worms spread over the internet. Here you can see at least how Slashdot gets infested with worms: http://www.netdisaster.com/go.php?mode=worms&url=h ttp://www.slashdot.org

  93. So it's a MS-Worm then by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    That is exactly what it looks like, a windows executable installer launched off of a web page with unknow origin.
    So it's a MS-Worm or MS-Windows Worm then.

    Calling it a 'worm' implies, through omission, that it affects other platforms. It goes without saying that worms and viruses are largely the domain of MS, however to generate useful discussion and or viable solutions, it does need to be pointed out explicitly, especially in the healines. Many people read only the headlines.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  94. UNIX Virus Simulator by JamesGecko · · Score: 1
    We *NIX folks have had a virus simulator for a while...

    Xbill, anyone?