Now, ask yourself, what is worse?...big corporations with private security contractors or big government with guns and also private security contractors?
A great way to address most crash scenarios is to pull your head out of your ass as a driver. Are we so lazy that we cannot accept doing chores as adults? God forbid we spend any amount of time not being entertained.
Also running with the 20mil/day consumption figure, having one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 will save us less than two days' worth of consumption per year
When dealing with grey-area stuff like limewire, CNET should learn from head shops and throw a legal disclaimer on the page. That way it's being distributed for legit purposes, even though everyone knows what you're *really* using it for.
I think the process is a little more complicated than "Child porn? Well it couldn't have been me!" "You heard the man, let him walk!". If there is probable cause they can seize the computers. Encryption or a "panic button" would only slow things down while they send the drives off to data forensics.
Anyone with any sense agrees that a raid with a warning wouldn't be useful. The point is that there should not have been a raid in the first place. Send a couple officers out with a warrant and have them bring the guy in. Life is not an action movie, and wearing a badge does not change that.
The provider can kill them on me, but I'll bet I can sue the provider for not providing access to something I've paid for.
Then the provider turns around and points to the provision in the EULA that prevents you from doing just that. Yes, preserving your data is a pain in the ass but it is a step you must take. Dismissing the possibility of backing up your own data due to cost/effort is just forcing yourself to choose between "I lost my stuff" and "They lost my stuff."
If retailers were forced to separately package each serving (or perhaps be liable for a serving tax), it might make them think a bit harder about the packet size and calorie content in the first place.
Or they would just bitch about the government stifling business and innovation. Why change your tune when you can point a finger?
So why do you need to buy "insurance" for something you know will happen.
Because you don't know *when* it will happen, and chances are it will happen at a time when you won't be able to afford it. Much in the same line that you pay for 'car insurance' but not 'fuel insurance', it's a matter of planned expense vs. unplanned expense.
They didn't do that one all on their own, they needed the GOP to hold their hand every step of the way so they could say it was a bipartisan effort to 'reach across the aisle' and compromise.
Are we? Did we get transported back to 1998? Think I'll put a few hundred on the Broncos!
Darn! I've checked. It's 2011 and you're an ignorant, fat, bigoted asshat.
BP acquired Amoco. That doesn't change the fact that they still have a ton of money they can use for securing important data. In the future why don't you take some time to explain whatever point you're trying to make instead of casting bile everywhere.
Slashdot Mirror
Balloons are extremely newsworthy if they may or may not have a tiny pilot
Being correct doesn't make them any less annoying
Mod the fuck up
Now, ask yourself, what is worse?...big corporations with private security contractors or big government with guns and also private security contractors?
FTFY
A great way to address most crash scenarios is to pull your head out of your ass as a driver. Are we so lazy that we cannot accept doing chores as adults? God forbid we spend any amount of time not being entertained.
Dogshit sounds like a nice "FU" without too much in possible ramifications.
It sounds nice until you're accused of exposing Federal agents to a potential biohazard
Also running with the 20mil/day consumption figure, having one million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 will save us less than two days' worth of consumption per year
When dealing with grey-area stuff like limewire, CNET should learn from head shops and throw a legal disclaimer on the page. That way it's being distributed for legit purposes, even though everyone knows what you're *really* using it for.
You gotta pay the troll toll
Come on me if you want to live
There are good competitive video games that foster positive social skills.
Online? With voice chat?? This I gotta see.
Ok you got me on that one; after reading into it further I see my assumptions are outdated.
I think the process is a little more complicated than "Child porn? Well it couldn't have been me!" "You heard the man, let him walk!". If there is probable cause they can seize the computers. Encryption or a "panic button" would only slow things down while they send the drives off to data forensics.
Anyone with any sense agrees that a raid with a warning wouldn't be useful. The point is that there should not have been a raid in the first place. Send a couple officers out with a warrant and have them bring the guy in. Life is not an action movie, and wearing a badge does not change that.
That's what the other particle is for.
It's slang, much like your awful use of "fail."
The provider can kill them on me, but I'll bet I can sue the provider for not providing access to something I've paid for.
Then the provider turns around and points to the provision in the EULA that prevents you from doing just that. Yes, preserving your data is a pain in the ass but it is a step you must take. Dismissing the possibility of backing up your own data due to cost/effort is just forcing yourself to choose between "I lost my stuff" and "They lost my stuff."
I thought these "information junkie" articles were an artifact of the 90s.
If retailers were forced to separately package each serving (or perhaps be liable for a serving tax), it might make them think a bit harder about the packet size and calorie content in the first place.
Or they would just bitch about the government stifling business and innovation. Why change your tune when you can point a finger?
You get what you pay for. Yes, it is slightly more expensive to make it at home, but the quality is night-and-day.
So why do you need to buy "insurance" for something you know will happen.
Because you don't know *when* it will happen, and chances are it will happen at a time when you won't be able to afford it. Much in the same line that you pay for 'car insurance' but not 'fuel insurance', it's a matter of planned expense vs. unplanned expense.
I'll take a shot: Have you heard of Obamacare?
They didn't do that one all on their own, they needed the GOP to hold their hand every step of the way so they could say it was a bipartisan effort to 'reach across the aisle' and compromise.
Are we? Did we get transported back to 1998? Think I'll put a few hundred on the Broncos! Darn! I've checked. It's 2011 and you're an ignorant, fat, bigoted asshat.
BP acquired Amoco. That doesn't change the fact that they still have a ton of money they can use for securing important data. In the future why don't you take some time to explain whatever point you're trying to make instead of casting bile everywhere.
Allow Weird Al to demonstrate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGWiTvYZR_w
Why would you waste precious bandwith on the trash made in Idols, Popstars and all those other not-music-but-profit related shows?
Most people don't because they listen to actual music.