Slashdot Mirror


US Students Suffering From Internet Addiction

PsiCTO writes "American college students are hooked on cellphones, social media and the Internet and showing symptoms similar to drug and alcohol addictions, according to a new study. This probably falls under the no-big-surprise category. CBC Radio 1 played a couple of interviews with students that took part in the study. I especially liked the quote in which the student felt like he had a phantom limb experience with his cell phone."

314 comments

  1. No News Affiliation? by alphatel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Students in the Maryland study also showed no loyalty to news programs, a news personality or news platform.

    Must be why Katie Couric left.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:No News Affiliation? by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 2

      The revelation that [paraphrase] "college students have little loyalty to news programs, and rarely watch TV or read a newspaper" is far from it. TV and newspapers are expensive when you're in school, and are often tricky to negotiate in a dorm, which you don't own and are limited in space. What college students DO do a lot of is watch TV programs, but they do it for free on Hulu or network websites or for very cheap through Netflix and iTunes. If people look at the internet and attached devices as enabling a lot more interaction and getting of news, they really can take the place of traditional media sources. Maybe it's of a different type, but choice is a Good Thing.

      --
      I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
    2. Re:No News Affiliation? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2

      If people look at the internet and attached devices as enabling a lot more interaction and getting of news, they really can take the place of traditional media sources. Maybe it's of a different type, but choice is a Good Thing.

      I found it particularly odd that TFA states "They maintained a casual relationship to news brands, and rarely distinguished between news and general information." - what is news if not general information? Maybe saying that exposes me as a member of the very generation they're studying, but it's more or less the definition I would provide if asked to describe 'news': information about what's going on around me.

      More generally, the sense of hand-wringing by both the authors and the student quoted seems excessive to me. A permanent connection to an information stream (world news, messages from friends, etc. etc.) seems like a wonderful thing to have access to, and I'm glad to live in a time when it's available - is it really surprising that artificially removing it from one person while everyone else remains connected is a somewhat jarring experience?

    3. Re:No News Affiliation? by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Must be why Katie Couric left.

      Who?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  2. My neice by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At 16, she is horribly addicted to all of these things. We had my dad's 70th b-day party over the weekend and she sulked in the corner the entire time with her face buried in her phone. When her dad tried to take it away so she could, you know, be involved with the family on this momentous occasion, she threw a temper tantrum I've not seen in anyone other than a 5 year old in the candy aisle at the grocery store.

    She's like that any time I see her - buried in the phone.

    1. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      She's 16. She most likely wouldn't be involved regardless of what object was in her hand.

    2. Re:My neice by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had a younger cousin around 16 who came to visit from Europe. My friend and next door neighbor suggested that my cousin meet her daughter and another friend and that they go out and have a good time somewhere. Well, the daughter was so buried into her phone texting her friends that she hardly even spoke to my cousin (who knew perfect English) and not even to her other friend. I met her once. I have the feeling that when she is with her friends she texts in real life, she'd bury her head into her phone and start texting someone else.

      I think, by allowing us to seek out the ideal people with our exact interests at the moment, the internet allows us to get into the mindset to discount the people around us as less worthwhile to interact with.

    3. Re:My neice by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Man messing about with a cellphone is all a 16y.o. could do in that situation. Hell it's what I would have done considering the party's participants .

    4. Re:My neice by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      In fairness - I'm in my 30s and have absolutely no interest in my mobile phone, beyond its occasional uses as a tool (I can make £10 of pre-paid credit last 3 months). However, while I'm fine with parents and grandparents, present me with a room full of my extended family and I will find something else - anything else - to be deeply absorbed in. I've made the back of a cereal packet last three hours under those kind of circumstances.

      Now, ok, I might just have an unusually repulsive extended family (actually, I'm pretty sure I do), but thinking back to the 16 year old me (in the days before the newly-fangled interweb was much more than a collection of geocities pages with strobe-effect pictures of kittens and hence not worth getting addicted to), nothing horrified me more than the prospect of family parties.

    5. Re:My neice by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Do you honestly expect a 16 year old to want to be involved in someone's 70th birthday?

    6. Re:My neice by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2

      Absolutely agreed - the tantrum sounds childish and absolutely unacceptable, but it'd be a rare 16 year old who would particularly want to be involved with a group of people well outside her age group who she more than likely feels herself to have little in common with. The lack of basic politeness sounds unfortunate, but I don't think that's the fault of the tech.

    7. Re:My neice by somersault · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think, by allowing us to seek out the ideal people with our exact interests at the moment, the internet allows us to get into the mindset to discount the people around us as less worthwhile to interact with.

      Yeah, that's an interesting point. I had a long distance relationship with someone who eventually came over to live with me, and for a while I weirdly felt like something was "missing". I'd feel she was a completely different person when chatting online compared to speaking for real.

      I even feel like that when speaking to family members, I guess I just joke around more online. So I suppose it's really me who's different when typing than when speaking, even with people I've known all my life.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:My neice by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, the daughter was so buried into her phone texting her friends that she hardly even spoke to my cousin (who knew perfect English) and not even to her other friend. I met her once. I have the feeling that when she is with her friends she texts in real life, she'd bury her head into her phone and start texting someone else.

      I have witnessed this ... two teenagers who have gone someplace together and are now sitting and texting. I often can't decide if they're texting each other, or third parties.

      But, it's usually kind of funny/sad/lame to watch several teenagers, all with their phones out, all with headphones attached to their phones, and all heads down and texting and more or less ignoring one another. It's like self-imposed autism or something, and actually kind of sad to watch.

      I think, by allowing us to seek out the ideal people with our exact interests at the moment, the internet allows us to get into the mindset to discount the people around us as less worthwhile to interact with.

      And, really, except for the fact that now all of the 'cool' kids are doing it too ... how does this differ from IRC, ICQ, AOL/MSN, Everquest, Second Life and all of the other things which have filled this niche before?

      Teenagers have always been withdrawn, moody and sulky ... but now texting seems to basically fill up their day, which makes them look even more withdrawn, moody, and sulky. Some days I'm actually glad I don't have the ability to text on my phone ... it's too reminiscent of MSN or something to me.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:My neice by AntEater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In many cultures (past and present) a 16 year old is considered an adult and often has learned to demonstrate the maturity and responsibility that goes with that status. It is a sad state when a 16 year old has to be treated like a child and even sadder when they respond at a level even lower than the pathetic expectations of our society. I don't understand why someone in their teens finds it so challenging to interact with other adults regardless of age. Yes, the cell phone had little to do with it.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    10. Re:My neice by xaxa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you honestly expect a 16 year old to want to be involved in someone's 70th birthday?

      I'm almost 10 years older than this girl, so I'm a bit more willing to talk to my grandparents and their siblings. After looking at Google StreetView on my phone of my new house we found that the houses my grandparents/siblings lived in during WWII were still there, and still recognisable. Though they were only children at the time it was interesting to hear about their experiences -- they'd hardly spoken about it before (so mum was especially pleased), but having a map, pictures, and in one case a Wikipedia page for my great-great-great-(great?-)grandad, jogged memories.

    11. Re:My neice by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WTF?... What a fucking low standard we should hold 16 year old's to these days?

      Makes me feel old beyond my years to say that I attended multiple birthdays of 'old people' and managed to look like I was sharing the same reality.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    12. Re:My neice by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      The college age guy in front of me in a food place a couple days ago had to be prompted three times by the woman working the register before he got his attention off the damn phone text.

      But, you know, I'm sure he was in contact with a colleague about their imminent breakthrough on a cancer cure.

    13. Re:My neice by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      I think, by allowing us to seek out the ideal people with our exact interests at the moment, the internet allows us to get into the mindset to discount the people around us as less worthwhile to interact with.

      Well, we've always discounted strangers you're being forced to talk to as less worthwhile to interact with. As adults, it's something we have to do all the time, so we get used to it. As a child, I remember being placed in a similar situation as the one you described. I didn't have a phone or the internet, but when my parents said, "this kid about your age is visiting, hang out with him" I felt that to be a chore, equivalent with mowing the lawn. "I don't want to hang out with a new kid I've never met. I have my own friends and he's not one of them." At 16, I would have had more tolerance for it, but it would still have been something I would do because of a sense of duty, and I'd be polite, but try to get it over with as soon as possible.

      Kids and teenagers don't deal well with forced social situations. They have cliques. They try hard to get in the ones they want to get in, and they try hard to keep people out of them that they don't think are deserving of it. It's not the technology, and they grow out of it as this type of social interaction becomes a bigger part of their lives.

    14. Re:My neice by khr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you honestly expect a 16 year old to want to be involved in someone's 70th birthday?

      Want? Not necessarily... Participate, yes, and even pretend to be cheerful.

    15. Re:My neice by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And, really, except for the fact that now all of the 'cool' kids are doing it too ... how does this differ from IRC, ICQ, AOL/MSN, Everquest, Second Life and all of the other things which have filled this niche before?

      Well, for one thing, those others were generally done while at home, and not while walking around or driving or other public activities. That seems to be the problem most people have with it. If they are sitting on a bench minding their own business, that's fine, but with increasing frequency their distraction causes problems for others.

      There was a case here in California just recently of another shithead teen wiping out her car because of texting, and another where someone walked right in front of a car because they were so buried in their texting they just wandered into a street. You could argue Darwin Award for the latter, but do you want to be the guy who hit that person? There's still going to be an investigation as to whose fault it was, and, yeah, *that's* a perfect, flawless process, right?

      On the other hand, YouTube videos like the woman who texted her way into a mall water fountain are always gold.

    16. Re:My neice by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Parents reap what they sow. I think the problem is that helicopter parents coddle their precious snowflakes too much and that encourages the kids to become both brats and ineptly fragile in many dimensions. As counterintuitive as it seems to be for most in society, you shouldn't treat children like babies forever, you need to let them do things on their own, get hurt, make mistakes, learn consequences, etc. Instead I see parents always swooping in and doing things for their kids, leading to the kids never learning anything and feeling entitled to boot, or bailing kids out of even minor difficulties so they don't develop any respect for consequences.

      Any parent whose children are not, for most purposes, de facto independent by high school is a failure.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    17. Re:My neice by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand why someone in their teens finds it so challenging to interact with other adults regardless of age.

      I know people in their 20s and early 30s who don't interact well with other adults unless it's via SMS, Twitter or Facebook. They literally have no concept of how to carry on a face-to-face conservation. No idea of the importance of looking someone in the eye, having a good handshake or listening to someone for more than 140 characters without interrupting them. These same people then proceed to whine about their lack of a social and love life.

      Honestly I can't wrap my head around it. I was a child of the internet age and spent my formative years on IRC but I still know how to carry on a face to face conservation. I still understand the importance of eye contact and body language to human communication. How the hell do people make it to their late 20s/early 30s without learning these skills?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    18. Re:My neice by lxs · · Score: 1

      Prompted? Whatever happened to kicking him from the line and helping the next customer?

    19. Re:My neice by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      and don't get me started on the fucker who was absorbed in a book.

    20. Re:My neice by dreamchaser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My daughter is now almost 21 and remarkably mature for her age, but if she were 16 and had acted that way I'd have smashed her phone. Parents today are huge enablers of such selfish behavior.

    21. Re:My neice by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Well, for one thing, those others were generally done while at home, and not while walking around or driving or other public activities.

      Only because we didn't have the ability to do them on the hoof. You were tethered to a computer plugged into a wall and a network connection, this is just the logical conclusion. Now, you can be hooked into this kind of stuff 24/7, no matter where you're at.

      There was a case here in California just recently of another shithead teen wiping out her car because of texting, and another where someone walked right in front of a car because they were so buried in their texting they just wandered into a street.

      Oh, god, don't remind me. Where I live, we passed a law that made it illegal to use a hand-held device while operating a motor vehicle. By the looks of it, it hasn't deterred anybody since I routinely see people still doing it.

      I have literally looked in my rear view and seen someone texting on their Blackberry -- while driving the car behind me; both thumbs clearly on the keypad, which leaves no room for driving. Just the other day, I saw a guy with a cell phone in his right hand, and holding his cigarette out the window with his left ... I'm not clear on how he was actually driving.

      I'm of the opinion there needs to be fairly steep fines for trying to operate a cell phone while driving -- though, lots of people still insist they can do it effectively.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering that humans are living longer (on average) than humans in the entire history of our species children are not required to grow up (mentally) as fast as they did in the past. Not long ago (in the 20th century) many children were required to work full-time jobs to help support their families which, in turn, required them to be mature and responsible at a much earlier age. Those that did not have full-time employment outside the home were required to be full-time homemakers and act as surrogate mothers/fathers to the younger children in the home while the parents were out working 14-hour days on the farm or in a factory. Early death for parents was also extremely high due to labor conditions and poor health research/public policy and it wasn't uncommon for a young child to have to take over as head of the household when a parent was killed on the job or by diseases that are almost non-existent now. Biologists have proven that the brain does not form to complete maturity until around the age of 23 so it is kind of nice that kids can be kids for a bit longer.

    23. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god you think a 16-year-old female trowing a tantrum is childish? You have no idea what I feel when my 29-year-old girlfriend throws one. Here is a hint: It got nothing to do with social media.

    24. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved going to my grandparents' birthday parties. My Grandma would get my Grandpa strippers, then both of them would get way too drunk and make asses of themselves. My grandfather was a retired military officer, so a large number of rowdy drunken folks of all ages were at those parties. It was an eye-opener as a kid to see that grown-ups aren't very, well, grown up at heart, and are very capable of being boneheads.

      As for the cellphone thing, I'm affected by it because I'm fucking a 20 year-old woman now. I tell her to turn off her phone when we're hanging out and she sets it to vibrate, and still responds to every text she gets. She flips and accuses me of fucking other women if a day passes without me texting her. I would like to call her an anomalous case, but it seems that everybody her age is stuck to their phones like a bitch is stuck to her knotted-up stud.

      That, in a nutshell, is what progress is about. You're now down with the discount.

      -- Ethanaol-fueled, incognito

    25. Re:My neice by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The written and spoken words are two very different things. When writing, the "speaker" uses the structure and syntax of the language alone to communicate their meaning( though some allowances can be made for formatting, etc). When speaking, tone, expression, gestures and immediacy all lend an entirely different character (and confusion) to the conversation.

      You can judge someone's opinions by what they write, but you won't have much luck telling much else about them. It's not surprising; judgig someone by what they write would be like judging someone on what they cook for dinner.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    26. Re:My neice by jonescb · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Right. I'm 20, and I couldn't care less about being involved in my family. Why should I be obligated to care about an arbitrary group of people who I didn't choose to be my family. I'll do what I want to do, not what my grandpa thinks I should do.

    27. Re:My neice by somersault · · Score: 1

      You can tell a lot about a person by how and what they cook for dinner! :P

      --
      which is totally what she said
    28. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 16, she is horribly addicted to all of these things. We had my dad's 70th b-day party over the weekend and she sulked in the corner the entire time with her face buried in her phone. When her dad tried to take it away so she could, you know, be involved with the family on this momentous occasion, she threw a temper tantrum I've not seen in anyone other than a 5 year old in the candy aisle at the grocery store.

      She's like that any time I see her - buried in the phone.

      At 16 I wouldn't think she could pay for her own ~$80 a month cell phone bill, or pass a credit report to get a contract, so that leads me to believe the parents provide the phone for her. They are more at fault here.

      I have a 6 year old son, he will get a cell phone when he is old enough to buy it, and pay for the contract himself, and unless they revoke child labor laws, shouldn't be until he is 18 or so.

    29. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 16, you can't smoke, can't drink, can't gamble, can't vote, can't die for your country, and in some states, can't really drive.

      Sixteen? Adult? Please.

      Keep extending childhood, but for the love of Thor, stop being shocked when the result is twenty-something year old tantrum-throwing children. It's happening now, and is only going to get worse.

    30. Re:My neice by adeft · · Score: 1

      Has nothing to do with age, don't be fooled. Decent kids can be any age, just like not so decent ones.

    31. Re:My neice by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      At 16, she is horribly addicted to all of these things. We had my dad's 70th b-day party over the weekend and she sulked in the corner the entire time with her face buried in her phone.

      I suspect neither the phone nor its internet connectivity were the real problem here.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    32. Re:My neice by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      And whether or not I agree with this comment...wtf does technology have to do with it? Last generation it'd have been a book.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    33. Re:My neice by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Kids and teenagers don't deal well with forced social situations. They have cliques. They try hard to get in the ones they want to get in, and they try hard to keep people out of them that they don't think are deserving of it.

      And this is different than adults how?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    34. Re:My neice by operagost · · Score: 1

      No, but I expect them to not be a demonic brat.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    35. Re:My neice by himitsu · · Score: 1

      Unsuccessful troll is unsuccessful. Yay far /.

    36. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I would ask where you learned those skills? Did you have peers that didn't shun you? If so, you were lucky. I consider my electronic communications to be very real, and am generally uninterested in face-to-face conversation. I refuse to fake shit and lie, which makes it harder to fit in. Really, I prefer conversation to carry real substance as opposed to a pile of bullshit used to appease the other person. For that reason, I refuse to participate in social interactions designed to facilitate social interaction. I am not alone in this.

      And yes, I don't understand the importance of looking someone in the eye or having a good handshake. Why the fuck does that have to affect what I'm saying? If my handshake is loose, does that make my ideas too weak? If my handshake is too strong, does that make me an asshole that isn't worth listening to? If I can't look you in the eye, because I'd rather look at something more interesting, does that make me a liar? What the fuck?

      But seriously, I suggest you read "Look me in the eye" by John Elder Robinson, maybe you'll understand. It says it's about someone with aspergers, but I think that's kind of bullshit; it's more like people are using the term "aspergers" to describe the fact that these people think differently.

    37. Re:My neice by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, it's usually kind of funny/sad/lame to watch several teenagers, all with their phones out, all with headphones attached to their phones, and all heads down and texting and more or less ignoring one another. It's like self-imposed autism or something, and actually kind of sad to watch.

      Does anyone here remember what teenagers did before mobile phones? Did you all have unmissable, action-packed adolescences or something?

      I can remember being a teenager and hanging out with other teenagers. They were among the most mind numbingly boring experiences of my life. I can vividly recall spending entire days "hanging out" with groups in towns. Let me give you a typical "fun time".

      Six+ hours spent standing outside shops, on street corners, under bridges occassional window browsing, one 40 minute break in a cafe, and all the while everyone talking complete and utter shite about either music, tv, movies or gossip. One continuous topic would typically be what we'd all see in the cinema later on. Eventually, after hours of idle meandering, legs now aching with pain, the group would finally make it to that place, at which point either a) no money would remain for everyone to see the film, so we'd all go home, or b) everyone would go in and talk continuously throughout the entire film. Later, people would either ring their parents for lifts home, or walk the long mile back to their abodes.

      It was a special kind of purgatory. It was like going to mass, followed by attending a funeral, and afterwards a lecture in the tanneries of ancient Assyria, all mixed in with waiting in a long queue to fill in forms that made no sense. Imagine if you will Silent Bob without the Jay, standing on a corner _not_ having amazing adventures or experiences. Ah, the heady days of youth!

      I'm sure some poster will following this up with tales of their awesome, all-American, action packed teenage socialising. But my experience was that teenagers were as boring as shit. Too old to play, too young to talk, too poor to go anywhere interesting, and too inexperienced to know when their bored.

      Autism?! Autism!!! You think texting on their phones is a form of autism?! Teenagers are intrinsically autistic, monosyllabic, awkward, and uninteresting people. The phones and the internet have nothing to do with it.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    38. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what is known as the new generation of worthless, spoiled brats. There is a reason the quality of human beings has declined so drastically the last century. Ever since honor, respect, integrity, and self worth were all but eradicated by several generations of extremely spoiled offspring this really isn't a surprise. You can't remove discipline from the equation and expect children to naturally become adults. We just have a bunch of 30-50 year old children raising children... and this is coming from someone who is 26.

    39. Re:My neice by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      >I think, by allowing us to seek out the ideal people with our exact interests at the moment, the internet allows us to get into the mindset to discount the people around us as less worthwhile to interact with.

      EXACTLY. This hits the nail so hard it creates a singularity.

      When I was in high school I couldn't really relate to anyone. Then I found local BBS systems, then later, the Internet. (this was the early 90s). It was like paradise; all these people with similar interests actually existed! Meanwhile in high school, only one person even came close and even then, computers and geekery were only a passing interest to him.

      I'm sure this is a more pronounced experience than typical non-geeks, but it can definitely explain some people who are addicted. Even today, many of my best friends are people I mostly talk to online.

    40. Re:My neice by jonescb · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Satan made cell phones now. Where may I acquire one of these demonic devices?

    41. Re:My neice by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Other cultures (past and present) eat their dead. Should we expect people in this culture to be able to eat their dead? There was a reason you had to say other, it not this one.

      Things change. 150 years ago, in this culture, 16 year olds looked forward to the same entertainment and job opportunities that a 70 year old did. It is no longer like this and actually hasn't been for some time now so things changed. A 16 year old now just has less interests in common with a 70 year old. Obviously, they are going to have less to do with each other. Hell, I'm 30 and you're going to be hard pressed to find me doing anything but sitting quietly when you fill a room with a bunch of 70+ people, and ya, I'm going to be looking for an excuse to go and do something I do find enjoyable.

      However, I think it's pretty obvious that if you have a 16 year old throwing a temper tantrum, that's a pretty big parenting fail.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    42. Re:My neice by ph0rk · · Score: 1

      It is a sad state when a 16 year old has to be treated like a child

      Why, exactly?

      I mean, what's so special about adulthood, really?

      --
      semantics are everything!
    43. Re:My neice by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Prompted? Whatever happened to kicking him from the line and helping the next customer?

      And get chewed out by the manager. Between the boss and the customer the worker is just a second class peasant.

    44. Re:My neice by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The college age guy in front of me in a food place a couple days ago had to be prompted three times by the woman working the register before he got his attention off the damn phone text.

      On the second failed prompt, you step around him.

      Don't be an enabler.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    45. Re:My neice by similar_name · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My daughter is now almost 21 and remarkably mature for her age, but if she were 16 and had acted that way I'd have smashed her phone.

      Ok, that's kinda funny isn't it?

    46. Re:My neice by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Makes me feel old beyond my years to say that I attended multiple birthdays of 'old people' and managed to look like I was sharing the same reality.

      Were those old people positive forces in your life? I have alcoholic relatives that I was afraid of and now resent. If I had even been invited to one of their old-ass birthday parties at 16, which wouldn't have happened anyway because my family is not in the habit of cleaning up the messes made by its children as if their responsibility ended when they left the house, I would not have been materially involved.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:My neice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Does anyone here remember what teenagers did before mobile phones? Did you all have unmissable, action-packed adolescences or something?

      Not sure about unmissable or action packed ... I had a bike, a skateboard, a paper route for most of it, the odd video arcade. I remember lots of walking, and occasionally scaring up a porn stash or getting our hands on some pot or beer.

      It was a special kind of purgatory. It was like going to mass, followed by attending a funeral, and afterwards a lecture in the tanneries of ancient Assyria, all mixed in with waiting in a long queue to fill in forms that made no sense.

      Wow, memories of teen angst, Catholic guilt, and whatever else your apparently British up-bringing saddled you with. Sounds like good times. ;-) "Rub, buggery, and the lash" as it were.

      Imagine if you will Silent Bob without the Jay, standing on a corner _not_ having amazing adventures or experiences. Ah, the heady days of youth!

      Yeah, but we had lower expectations then, and hanging around doing nothing was what we thought was cool at the time. OK, maybe not.

      Autism?! Autism!!! You think texting on their phones is a form of autism?!

      Only that it seems to further exaggerate the anti-social behaviors already exhibited by teens. It's also why you they all essentially test as psychopaths. Childhood and adolescence is what made me decide not to be a parent. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    48. Re:My neice by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Adults are children with much more expected of them.

    49. Re:My neice by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      By 'high school', do you mean the beginning or end of high school? I sure as hell wouldn't expect an 11 year old to be 'de facto independent'.

    50. Re:My neice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      "Rub, buggery, and the lash" as it were.

      Rum, even. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    51. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your grandpa just wants you to love him back. Don't worry tho, your self-centeredness will wear off eventually.

    52. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      be involved with the family on this momentous occasion

      Personally, I wouldn't call a birthday party significant. Maybe she just found it pointless. Although, the tantrum you mentioned was rather illogical.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    53. Re:My neice by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No. Biologists have RATIONALIZED that the brain does not for to complete maturity until around the age of 23. There is a big difference between becoming fully mature, and no longer changing in a positive way. No doubt the biologists you speak of are over the age of 23 themselves. This not only leaves a gread deal of room for conformation bias, but it also leads to definitions like "don't reach maturity until 23" instead of "begins it's inevitable degradation at 23".

      I find it really sad that kids the current standard is to make your kids retarded instead of helping them reach their potential.

    54. Re:My neice by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's because high school isn't for another few years?

    55. Re:My neice by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      So, your saying that your 16 year old niece is behaving just like 16 year old girls have since the day teen culture was formed, and you are trying to blame it on current trends? Amazing. At least you can sleep well at night knowing that you have also been behaving exactly like adults have behaved around teens since teen culture has formed.

    56. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. I'm 20, and I couldn't care less about being involved in my family. Why should I be obligated to care about an arbitrary group of people who I didn't choose to be my family. I'll do what I want to do, not what my grandpa thinks I should do.

      Because you came out of your Grandpa's scrotum and therefore you owe him your life.

    57. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      No idea of the importance of looking someone in the eye, having a good handshake

      Might I ask how either of those are factually important? Many people seem to think that social interaction is factually important, but that really is their own opinion. Some people just don't like it or would rather be alone. I don't think there's anything wrong with that (unless they do want it but are terribly afraid).

      These same people then proceed to whine about their lack of a social and love life.

      That seems rather stupid of them.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    58. Re:My neice by SeeSp0tRun · · Score: 1

      I drive a standard, own a Droid, and consider myself both proficient at texting and driving.

      That being said, and =/= while. I say make these kids drive a good old stick, let Darwin sort out the rest.

      --
      Something witty.
    59. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      And they have more experience. Too bad many of them don't seem to be able to control their emotions enough to use it.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    60. Re:My neice by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      As, long as they outlaw passangers while they are at it, I'm on board with you. Otherwise, you just come off as a Luddite technophobe.

    61. Re:My neice by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      So, the exact same behavior that we saw in people BEFORE cell phones? I'm not really surprised.

    62. Re:My neice by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Eleven years old would be solidly in middle school, exceptions excluded. Remember this is a US-centric site, so definitions should be assumed to be US ones. High school does not begin until 8th or 9th grade in most if not all US public education systems.

      That aside, beginning high school is always preferable. As objectively as I can look at my own development I think I reached de facto independence around 10th grade. The end of high school is the minimum standard, as that is essentially the time when legal pseudo-adulthood is reached anyway. (The current multi-tiered age of majority is ridiculous anyway and should be, at a minimum, consolidated at one age for all laws making the distinction between adults and minors. Personally I would prefer a meritocratic model where behaviors are earned regardless of age.)

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    63. Re:My neice by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Might I ask how either of those are factually important?

      My interpersonal skills and networking abilities have secured job offers for me. Can't say for sure what would have happened without them but it was definitely to my advantage to have them.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    64. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      The temper tantrum is called spoiled, its not addiction. Shes not addicted to the internet, she just is "addicted" if you will to social interaction. Many teen girls are. Also, many teens are not interested in their families at that time because they are preoccupied with developing socially. She probably would have the same problem on the school playground or during class by passing notes around.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    65. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      You can converse with people without giving them handshakes or looking them in the eye.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    66. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers."

      ATTRIBUTION: Attributed to SOCRATES by Plato

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    67. Re:My neice by sakti · · Score: 1

      That's not internet addiction. That's just old fashion teenage rebellion combined with a health dose of spoiled brat.

      --
      "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees." - Albert Camus
    68. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 2

      Whatever. Younger adult's financial independence keeps getting pushed back later and later in life. Thats the fault of the old folks. I wish I could go get a good paying job, pay my taxes, have a couple kids with my wife, but guess what? I can't because old fogey's in positions of power think they deserve more pay than they actually do and think that us young folks deserve less pay than we do. Since the baby boomers are the old folks these days, there's a majority population to try to combat for positions of power and to combat with our votes.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    69. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 0
      "The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers."

      Attributed to SOCRATES by Plato

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    70. Re:My neice by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      It is a sad state when a 16 year old has to be treated like a child and even sadder when they respond at a level even lower than the pathetic expectations of our society.

      Sad state? More like frightening--in most places 16 is old enough to legally get behind the wheel of a motor vehicle.

    71. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      No idea of the importance of looking someone in the eye, having a good handshake or listening to someone for more than 140 characters without interrupting them. These same people then proceed to whine about their lack of a social and love life.

      Why is this important? Its only important if you make it important by requiring it of people. Im a little shy myself, but I can talk to people in a professional manner and shake hands, etc.. I just don't have anything to say most of the time since I really find it tedious to talk to many people. Not because I think Im smarter than everyone else, its just because I get tired of fake relationships and fake things people do or say to "be social". The next thing you know they will be spreading rumors or talking about things that are not their business behind your back to other colleagues trying to "be social" with them as well. Theres a reason some people keep small groups of friends, and in my case, its because I found the least fake people I could to be my friends.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    72. Re:My neice by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly expect a 16 year old to want to be involved in someone's 70th birthday?

      I don't see why not. I was glad to go to my Grandaddy's 70th - if nothing else it meant I got some time with Grandaddy (not so much as on other days as he was busy with the adults and the raftloads of family there that day) and got to hang out with my uncles and cousins. But then, my parents taught me to that family was important - and that being with them was both fun and the right thing to do. (Disclaimer: I'm a Southerner, and we take these things more seriously than most.)
       
      The problem with most 16 year old isn't that they're teenagers, it's bad parenting. If she's still throwing tantrums like that at 16, something is seriously wrong.

    73. Re:My neice by jittles · · Score: 1

      I have walked through restaurants and bars and seen groups of college age students sitting around just texting. 10-15 people not even talking, just sitting around at a table and texting. Its very sad.

    74. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      It passes. Come to a college campus some time.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    75. Re:My neice by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

      It's really not that hard to drive with your knees. The problems are when someone has their hands busy for any amount of time that would preclude them from making a severe correction in an unforeseen circumstance, and when the person has their attention pulled away from the world and thus fails to notice a pedestrian or car doing something out of the ordinary. If you're careful you can keep your attention on the road and your hands close enough to the wheel while doing some relatively simple functions on a device, but texting is clearly not a simple function no matter how good at it someone gets (unless you can do it one-handed without even looking at the screen).

    76. Re:My neice by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      My daughter is now almost 21 and remarkably mature for her age, but if she were 16 and had acted that way I'd have smashed her phone.

      Ok, that's kinda funny isn't it?

      Why? That's exactly what my cousin did to some of her students when she was teaching English in Japan a decade ago. They didn't believe her threat to toss their new, expensive phones out the 3rd floor window if they kept using them in class, and when she did exactly that they whined to their parents.

      Thankfully, upon the outraged parents meeting my cousin over this they sided with her. Probably had something to do with putting it in monetary terms--the parents were paying good money (this was at a private school) for their kid to take the class and actually learn the material.

      Of course she couldn't get away with that in North America. To the GP's point, the school would've instantly fired her, and the parents would sue both her and the school for destroying personal property and causing emotional harm to their poor, poor child.

    77. Re:My neice by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

      Adults are children who ideally have the money to buy bigger toys.

    78. Re:My neice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      As, long as they outlaw passangers while they are at it, I'm on board with you. Otherwise, you just come off as a Luddite technophobe.

      I don't think that recognizing that people aren't generally capable of operating a motor vehicle and the features of a cell phone while driving makes me a Luddite technophobe -- it makes me someone who has witnessed all sorts of really bad driving by people who are convinced they can do both.

      You can always tell your passenger to shut up, but ultimately, you're responsible (and accountable) for primarily operating the vehicle you're driving, and having that be your main task.

      If your eyes are on your Blackberry because you're texting, or you don't have enough hands left to actually operate a motor vehicle, you're a dangerous idiot. As I said, when I can tell that both of your thumbs are on your Blackberry, you deserve to be beaten with it.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    79. Re:My neice by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Honestly I can't wrap my head around it. I was a child of the internet age and spent my formative years on IRC but I still know how to carry on a face to face conservation. I still understand the importance of eye contact and body language to human communication. How the hell do people make it to their late 20s/early 30s without learning these skills?

      Faceless friends in a WoW Guild or IRC chatroom are far more appealing to someone who's had to deal with people in meatspace treating them like shit. At least with Internets friends, they can be ignored, blocked, or altogether avoided at the click of a mouse.

    80. Re:My neice by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I share your perspective on small talk.

      I can talk to people, and as a client-facing professional I have to. But I talk with them because I have to, not because I want to.

      I don't like having to feign interest in topics, but I have to in order to show people that I'm friendly. The thing is, I /am/ friendly, I just wish there was an easier way to show other people that I am a nice person and that they should feel at ease. But sadly, small talk is the only practical means of doing so. I prefer friendly silence over awkward small talk, but unfortunately I've only met a handful of people who share the same preference.

    81. Re:My neice by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the problem is that teens are treated like children and respond by living down to expectations? With zero tolerance policies that's all that's left to do. The more traditional response of breaking the rules in question isn't as much of an option anymore.

    82. Re:My neice by Krau+Ming · · Score: 1

      ya, that's cause almost anyone can be witty, nice, sweet, whatever when they've got time to think about it, type it out, re-think what they typed, and ultimately send the best possible response. when you're forced to carry on a conversation you don't have time come up with the best possible response... unless you want to be weird and think about it for a minute before speaking!

    83. Re:My neice by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Well, it was like "What would you like? Hey. HEY!" Happened quickly.

      Don't be such a misdirected blamer. Sheesh. [samuel jackson mode] Only on motherfucking Slashdot. (eyeroll)

    84. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't have a phone or the internet, but when my parents said, "this kid about your age is visiting, hang out with him" I felt that to be a chore, equivalent with mowing the lawn.

      I don't know if this was true of other people's parents or just mine, but my parents had a +-5 year margin of error on who the concidered "my age". They never seemed to understand why an 9 year old and a 14 year old might not have much in common.

    85. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parents reap what they sow. I think the problem is that helicopter parents coddle their precious snowflakes too much and that encourages the kids to become both brats and ineptly fragile in many dimensions. As counterintuitive as it seems to be for most in society, you shouldn't treat children like babies forever, you need to let them do things on their own, get hurt, make mistakes, learn consequences, etc. Instead I see parents always swooping in and doing things for their kids, leading to the kids never learning anything and feeling entitled to boot, or bailing kids out of even minor difficulties so they don't develop any respect for consequences.

      Any parent whose children are not, for most purposes, de facto independent by high school is a failure.

      I completely agree, however my girlfriend gets a horrified look on her face every I mention that I think the best way to raise a child is at age 5 throw them down a long gravel driveway and not let them back in the house until they are 18. If you want to be nice leave food and water on the porch every other day.

    86. Re:My neice by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      Sure-- if you want to give off the constant, gut-level, and unshakable vibe of being either 1) creepy or 2) contemptuous of the person you're talking to.

      Eye contact and handshakes are part of the social contract-- if you screw it up, you risk alienating those who you are trying to communicate with in a very real way. "I don't care about that 'fake' social stuff" is all well and good, but be prepared to deal with the results.

      For example, in the professional world, when you hear someone talking about an ex-employee along the lines of "well, he was good at his job.. but he didn't work out", that's usually what that means.

    87. Re:My neice by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "WTF?... What a fucking low standard we should hold 16 year old's to these days?"

      Sixteen year-old chicks haven't changed. You have. (I'm old too, BTW.)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    88. Re:My neice by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      The problem with the Darwin approach is that they might take you or me out as well, or at the very least do endless thousand of dollars of damage to our cars and millions of dollars of damage to our bodies.

      Selection, natural or otherwise, is not best played out with large masses of metal moving at high rates of speed that become very unselective when out of control.

    89. Re:My neice by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      What I love is people saying "Derp, I can drive and text fine!" as if we're supposed to [1] just accept that and [2] give them a medal or something.

    90. Re:My neice by couchslug · · Score: 1

      It's cruel to drag the young as a rent-a-crowd for the old. If they aren't interested, dump them somewhere else and go enjoy the event.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    91. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Sure-- if you want to give off the constant, gut-level, and unshakable vibe of being either 1) creepy or 2) contemptuous of the person you're talking to.

      Is there a better answer than "some people like it"? I was asking for a logical reason.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    92. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      A logical reason that doesn't revolve around the perceived idiocy of the general populace, that is.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    93. Re:My neice by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      While control over emotions is a factor, otherwise ordinary people can and often do change drastically when the focus of an addiction is a factor. Someone in a different thread mentioned being in a relationship where not texting his girlfriend every day meant (to her) that he was cheating on her.

      At first she was very much the embodiment of my dream come true. Granted, we had a bit of a language barrier between us and time zones (it was a long distance relationship). At the beginning of the relationship it was wonderful, we would chat with Skype and fall asleep together with mics and cams on. I even met her mum and step-dad (with skype). We met at Christmas and she stayed at my place, parting ways at the aeroport sucked. As time went on after she left it deteriorated.

      I just got out of a relationship with an otherwise exceptionally intelligent woman just a year (she's 28 as I type this) younger than me, who got perfect or extremely-near-perfect (98% was disappointing to her) scores when she was a student. She now teaches at the same university she studied at and is already famous, well known and appreciated in her field with all the research she has accomplished, papers she's written (at least 40 I think) and the students absolutely love her, always asking her if they can be in her class. She's the youngest on staff and similar in age or even younger than most of the people she teaches, she's even an avid gamer like me. She's very much a bookworm, fiercely independent-minded, very career-oriented and has the ability to focus on tasks without issue. She doesn't smoke or drink, and her mother is (to put it simply) rich because of her own hard work growing up (doing a very self-validating job too, not something anyone could look down on for any reason). It's probably easy to see why I fell for her and no I didn't give a shit about the money, that was a nice bonus on top of everything else.

      However, that said: She's a fervent pessimist, I'm not. To her, if her uncle was able to quit smoking cigarettes cold-turkey one day many years ago, anyone who can't is stupid. She sometimes would disappear without warning for days (more than a week, once) when she didn't get her way (spoiled, self-centred), even for trivial matters. Her mother bought for her her first apartment. Not rented. Bought. This isn't a bad thing in and of itself, but I imagine it can only contribute to spoiling her daughter. We were playing online with a family I've known for twice as long as her, when I unthinkingly gave an item to the parents' 11 year old son (the parents were playing too) who begged for an item I had found that he could use, she misunderstood it as being something she could use too and immediately got VERY angry at me because I hadn't even considered asking her if she wanted it too (admittedly, I hadn't thought to and I had only had a passing glance at the item's description), she then logged off and insisted she would never play with me again, but after 22 minutes (and me being embarrassed by her in front of my friends) she came back. Psychologically, she sees things in black and white: there are no shades of reason in-between, and she can be very VERY vicious when she feels offended, even when no offence was intended (but she does sometimes apologize). I spoke to my psychiatrist about her and he said she probably has Borderline Personality Disorder. I know he shouldn't be diagnosing her so quickly and easily without meeting her but I don't hold it against him, the time to our session was coming to an end and he's only human. Of course I dreaded talking to her about it and put it off for a week because I knew she would get angry because 1) talking to my psychiatrist about her without her 2) thinking I couldn't talk to her about sensitive topics without her getting angry (self-fulfilling) 3) even suggesting that she has such a disorder. She once told me that her mum has the same sort of temperament, but whenever I brought that up again afterwards she always downplayed it. I read about it online and due to the ver

    94. Re:My neice by feepness · · Score: 2

      Right. I'm 20, and I couldn't care less about being involved in my family. Why should I be obligated to care about an arbitrary group of people who I didn't choose to be my family. I'll do what I want to do, not what my grandpa thinks I should do.

      Being pleasant to the people who dedicated a good portion of their adult lives shoveling food in one end of your alimentary canal and removing feces from the other while keeping you safe and healthy in general is called being grateful. You don't have to like them. You don't have to do what they think you should do. Caring about them simply means being polite and remotely interested.

      Now, if they didn't do that or only did it part way then you owe them less. But someone gave a huge portion of themselves to give you life, and others will be more inclined to like and respect you if you show you are capable of the same.

      In short, being polite isn't an obligation. Neither is being likable.

    95. Re:My neice by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      You're precisely right, and this thread is proof of it.

    96. Re:My neice by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood my point. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding yours. I was saying her disinterest is understandable, and that her showing that disinterest was impolite, but not the fault of the tech. You can't make someone have a good time if they're not, and I don't see how that's a "low standard we should hold 16 year old's to these days".

    97. Re:My neice by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention this, but she was also drop-dead sexy. She had been offered roles at games conventions to model for video game characters on two separate occasions by different game developing companies (both times she was very convincingly dressed as video game characters) but turned them down because she wants to teach. Yes, this is all true.

    98. Re:My neice by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      I betcha you can figure out ALL KINDS of interestin' factoids about folk just by sittn' down and takin' a gander that their syntax, word choice, and punctuation cues ;)

      They useta call it poetry, back afore all the intarwebs.

    99. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many cultures (past and present) a 16 year old is considered an adult and often has learned to demonstrate the maturity and responsibility that goes with that status. It is a sad state when a 16 year old has to be treated like a child and even sadder when they respond at a level even lower than the pathetic expectations of our society. I don't understand why someone in their teens finds it so challenging to interact with other adults regardless of age. Yes, the cell phone had little to do with it.

      In the US, anyone under the age of 18 is only a pseudo-person (no real rights, no control over their own life, the answer to every question they ask is "respect my authority"). Don't treat someone like a person and they won't act like one.

    100. Re:My neice by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      TL; DR

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    101. Re:My neice by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      Huh. I thought my statement was logical-- humans have an innate, gut-level reaction to agressive, incompetent, or distasteful social interaction. It can make your life harder if you have to interact with humans, which is well-nigh inevitable.

      Therefore, pick up on easy-to learn social cues in order to minimize difficulty and hassle in your life.

      Therefore, eye-contact and handshakes are a useful tool to have in your toolbox. Of course, YEMV depending on culture-- for instance, I had a difficult time in Korea while adjusting to the perception there that eye contact is an aggressive act. Until I was able to modify my social cues I unintentionally came across as kind of a dick to those I was trying to work with.

      Argument still stands tho-- if your toolbox of social skills contains only a mouse and keyboard, everyone looks like a nail.... wait, what?

    102. Re:My neice by kryliss · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you were a teen that needed a job and/or a hobby.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    103. Re:My neice by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Does anyone here remember what teenagers did before mobile phones? Did you all have unmissable, action-packed adolescences or something?

      I can remember being a teenager and hanging out with other teenagers. They were among the most mind numbingly boring experiences of my life. I can vividly recall spending entire days "hanging out" with groups in towns. Let me give you a typical "fun time".

      I'm only in my early thirties, but when I was a teen my friends and I... would basically have LAN parties at my house. Pretty much every weekend. Playing Doom 2, Duke Nukem 3D, Warcraft 2... whatever was the current popular game.

      Occasionally we would go out and see a movie, or even rent a movie.

      Just because you and your friends did boring things you didn't really sound like you cared for doesn't mean everyone else and their friends did.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    104. Re:My neice by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Right. I'm 20, and I couldn't care less about being involved in my family. Why should I be obligated to care about an arbitrary group of people who I didn't choose to be my family. I'll do what I want to do, not what my grandpa thinks I should do.

      See if you still feel that way when you're 30 or 40. That arbitrary group of people didn't choose you to be their family either but it doesn't change the fact that you're connected. Or if you want to look at it from a purely logical perspective, being involved with your family grants you access to a network that might be useful in the future.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    105. Re:My neice by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

      On next Christmas ask her to buy this for you: http://store.theworstpageintheuniverse.com/shirts.html#PARENT

    106. Re:My neice by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I'm of the opinion there needs to be fairly steep fines for trying to operate a cell phone while driving -- though, lots of people still insist they can do it effectively.

      Oh, lots of people can do it effectively, but only under ideal circumstances. You know, assuming the vehicle in front of them doesn't suddenly slam on the brakes to avoid hitting a kid who ran into the street after their ball and that the person coming down the road actually saw that stop sign.

      I think the problem is that people see it work often enough that they forget how easily things can go wrong.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    107. Re:My neice by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      We biked, camped, canoed, hacked, and played chess and D&D. Maybe not the most thrilling existence but I had fun. I have to be honest, it sounds like you hung out with the wrong group.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    108. Re:My neice by Velex · · Score: 1

      Oompah-loompah...

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    109. Re:My neice by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the people that get their job due to their firm handshake, networking, and interpersonal skills are salesmen. It's kind of a travesty when an engineering job goes to a salesman. Now, everyone needs that set of skills to some extent, the same way that everyone needs to be able to read, write, and do basic math. But when the hiring process rates the skin-deep social shmoozing skills above the ability to do the job, then you get shitty teams of sycophants and incompetence.

      There's a balancing act, but one is clearing more important then the other.

    110. Re:My neice by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      CLEARLY me communications kills work nun to gud.

    111. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that is only because of the opinions of the general populace. I see no logical reason why either of them are factually important other than "because a lot of people like it that way." In other words, it appears to be general human idiocy. It's really their own fault if they are so (seemingly to me) sensitive that they can't handle not being given a handshake or not being looked in the eyes. Neither are required for non-arbitrary reasons.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    112. Re:My neice by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      NONSENSE! Now have another bite of long pork and fava beans.

    113. Re:My neice by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      A 6 year old is happy to be there because there is cake. He don't know any better.
      A 16 year old is anxious to get on with their own life. He knows everything.
      A 26 year old is happy to get some insight. He knows he doesn't know shit.

      Wooo sweeping generalizations! But 16 to 26 is a huge jump and a lot changes in that time frame.

    114. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Banner? Is that you?

    115. Re:My neice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Oh, lots of people can do it effectively, but only under ideal circumstances. You know, assuming the vehicle in front of them doesn't suddenly slam on the brakes to avoid hitting a kid who ran into the street after their ball and that the person coming down the road actually saw that stop sign.

      Well, that's the theory.

      However, on shows like Canada's Worst Driver (which I gather most countries have their own version of) ... you can put people onto a closed track, driving in circles, and give them a couple of tasks to quickly demonstrate how utterly wrong those people are.

      I'm of the opinion that if you kill someone because you were texting on your Blackberry, you should have the same kind of legal penalties as if you'd been drunk. When I see people roll through stop lights or do other stupid things because they're holding their cell phone with one hand and gesturing with the other it makes me a little bit crazy.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    116. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because violence and lack of self-control is a much better role model...

    117. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called anxiety. I understand the reason for eye contact & body language, and when I'm discussing work-related or computer-realted projects, I have no problem communicating.

      It's the small talk that evades me, my mind goes blank, I have absolutely nothing to say, and I don't want to stare at people with a blank look.

      So I guess what I'm trying to say is, Go Fuck Yourself.

    118. Re:My neice by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I was asking for a logical reason.

      You are looking for logic where anthropology is concerned? Sucker ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    119. Re:My neice by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      Ah! I gotcha-- societal interactions seem arbitrary and capricious when compared to the interactions of maths, physics, etc.

      I would suggest, however, that although they SEEM to be arbitrary and idiotic (not sure why you would call social functions "idiotic" since they evolve as surely as biological function, idiocy seems to be an innappropriate word) that they are sometimes rooted in BIOLOGICAl functions of the eye and brain. I just read a really interesting book called "Sleights of Mind: What the Neuroscience of Magic Reveals about Our Everyday Deceptions", which is an exploration of magic tricks from the standpoint of neuroscience. One of the things I got from it was that certain social cues seem to be hard-wired into the brain... careful use of eye contact or eye direction can have interesting results.

      On the other hand, I do get cheezed off when incompetence combined with optimized social interaction is more valued in society and the workplace than competence combined with an indifference to such interaction... being good at socializing is often used by those who are dishonest.

    120. Re:My neice by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Humans are social animals. Most of our great achievements are because of our ability to work together in teams. To be included in a group, you need to demonstrate that you understand the 'rules' of that group.

    121. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      not sure why you would call social functions "idiotic" since they evolve as surely as biological function, idiocy seems to be an innappropriate word

      I used that word because I believe that judging people based on their lack of optimism in regards to social interaction (or certain aspects of it) is purely idiotic. It doesn't necessarily mean that they're "mean," that they're "liars," that they have some sort of mental disease, or that they can't do the job. That's the kind of behavior that I view as idiotic. It probably means that they are just introverts, or something similar to that.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    122. Re:My neice by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Everyone is selling something. It doesn't matter how much you know, it matter how much you can convince someone else you know. This has been true since the beginning of time, and will be true as long as humans walk the Earth. Ideally, people in hiring positions would develop their own social skills to a level where they could interact with an engineer who has little to no social skills, but technical skills and social skills will always be a killer combination.

    123. Re:My neice by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Humans are social animals.

      Most of them...

      But the "rules" are purely arbitrary and idiotic, according to some. There's no reason that I see to be so hostile towards someone who simply doesn't shake hands or make eye contact. It's pointless, and that alone does not reveal anything noteworthy about their character. I don't believe it's a reason to instantly judge them.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    124. Re:My neice by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Oh please. The majority of 70+ year olds I know are far less mature than the teenagers I've met. They're petty, love to gossip, are fearful of absolutely everything and spend most of their energy complaining about what everyone else is or isn't doing despite the fact that they spend the majority of their own time watching day-time tv.

      Compare that to the teenagers I know who are winning scholarships, competing in statewide athletic competitions, are excited and optimistic about the future and prefer to talk about government policy, economics and philosophy.

      Now if you look, you can find a dead beat 16 year old and an exceptional 75 year old. But if I had to pick between spending an afternoon hanging out with a bunch of teenagers or a bunch of 70+ year olds, I'd take the teenagers every time, the conversation's generally far saner.

    125. Re:My neice by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Oh please! The majority of 70+ year olds I know are far less mature than the teenagers I've met. They're petty, love to gossip, are fearful of absolutely everything and spend most of their energy complaining about what everyone else is or isn't doing despite the fact that they spend the majority of their own time watching day-time tv.

      Compare that to the teenagers I know who are winning scholarships, competing in statewide athletic competitions, are excited and optimistic about the future and prefer to talk about government policy, economics and philosophy.

      Now if you look, you can find a dead beat 16 year old and an exceptional 75 year old. But if I had to pick between spending an afternoon hanging out with a bunch of teenagers or a bunch of 70+ year olds, I'd take the teenagers every time, the conversation's generally far saner.

    126. Re:My neice by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I wish I could go get a good paying job

      Stop crying, many baby bomers wish for the the same thing!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    127. Re:My neice by selven · · Score: 1

      16 year olds care more about their friends than their family. This happens regardless of technology and is a perfectly natural part of psychological development.

    128. Re:My neice by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      But when the hiring process rates the skin-deep social shmoozing skills above the ability to do the job, then you get shitty teams of sycophants and incompetence.

      The opposite extreme of a bunch of socially inept but technically competent people is just as bad, they will all sulk in their own corner and refuse to form a team (shitty or otherwise).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    129. Re:My neice by evilWurst · · Score: 1

      > The current multi-tiered age of majority is ridiculous anyway

      The best explanation I've heard for it is that at 18 we trust you to do a bunch of stuff.
      But we don't trust you to do all that stuff when drunk until 21.

    130. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people have always existed. It has nothing to do with technology. Many people simply lack the cognitive modelling of the perceptions of others required to demonstrate social skills.

    131. Re:My neice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because setting the example of violence and destruction to enforce will over another is a great example to set.

    132. Re:My neice by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Actually I think you are expecting too much of "adults".

      The truth is that we have a tendency to get into role playing games. I don't have the terminology fresh, but that idea is that given the right conditions, anybody can fall into a "game" where we subconsciously play by the rules we have seen to work before.

      So for instance, any adult trapped hopelessly in an extremely boring situation, subject to the whims of a friendly enough authority will try to play the "bored child game" since that's what worked for them decades ago.

      So it's not so much a matter of being an spoiled brat as much as it is a matter of bing human.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    133. Re:My neice by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      There is a wide gap between the statement "trying to operate a cell phone while driving" and "eyes are on your Blackberry". I will agree that trying to read and type messages while driving is a problem. Even more so than trying to tune a radio or pick a CD from that 300 disk case sitting on the passenger side floor, but saying that "You can always tell your passenger to shut up" is a silly way to claim that phone calls are worse than passengers. You can always tell the person on the other end of the phone to shut up also. Even more so, you can force the end of a phone conversation which is something that you cannot do to a passenger.

      Yes, thinking that someone is more dangers having a conversation with a person because they are not in the car, while a parent trying to watch their kids in the back seat is safe makes you a Luddite. Your position make no sense. You are trying to look at the best case scenario of one because it is old, and the worst case scenario of the other because it is new.

    134. Re:My neice by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Almost as much as people saying "Derp, I can drive and have passengers fine!" as if we're supposed to [1] just accept that and [2] give them a medal or something.

      Although I don't think I have ever heard anyone say that they can text fine while driving. I'm sure they are out there, but they are pretty few and far between.

    135. Re:My neice by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      I don't have much sympathy for them. They have had their whole lives to sort out their finances, vote people into office who represent them, and put their money where their mouth is when it comes to job creation, etc. Except, they didn't handle any of it. They voted people into office that ruined social security, allowed crooks to get away with outright theft on wall street, and the few that got rich off the other moronic baby boomers buy themselves another yacht or house instead of hiring people. Im just trying to get my life started, and I can't because they failed. When my father was just out of high school, he had no problem finding work that paid the same as I would get with a bachelors if you account for inflation. When my grandfather was out of high school, he got a job easily with a power company. He ended up being able to support a family of 5 for the first decade, then working there for a couple more decades he retired with a nice retirement account and some stock courtesy of the company. Good fucking luck finding that if you are 25, educated and willing to work. The reason old folks think its so easy to get work and make a living is because it was for them. Not so anymore for us courtesy of their bad decisions.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    136. Re:My neice by mjwx · · Score: 1

      WTF?... What a fucking low standard we should hold 16 year old's to these days?

      Makes me feel old beyond my years to say that I attended multiple birthdays of 'old people' and managed to look like I was sharing the same reality.

      It is very important to remember that it's your kids you'll be relying on in the later years. So threatening your son at 18 years, move out or join the army means that when you're 65, he'll remember that when he sticks you in the home he saw on 60 minutes.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    137. Re:My neice by Zanadou · · Score: 1

      Is she or her family Korean? She sounds exactly most most Korean women I know (I live here in South Korea—yeah, there's a whole nation of 'em).

    138. Re:My neice by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Not Korean, no.

    139. Re:My neice by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Does anyone here remember what teenagers did before mobile phones? Did you all have unmissable, action-packed adolescences or something? I can remember being a teenager and hanging out with other teenagers. They were among the most mind numbingly boring experiences of my life. I can vividly recall spending entire days "hanging out" with groups in towns. Let me give you a typical "fun time".

      I'm pretty sure that your type of teen life is in the minority. At least I hope so. Every teen I knew, and even the groups of teens in middle school/hs that I didn't know, were constantly doing all sorts of things. This was the time when CPU's were around 20mhz and computers were not yet in every home.

      We were constantly eventing crazy stuff to do.

      Age 13: group of us making it a mission to see some scary movie, and riding our bikes from vid store to vid store trying to find a clerk that would let us rent it, then scarying the crap out of ourselves when we watched it hehe.
      Age 14: walked down to a river on the edge of town, waded across it to an island in the middle, and built a tree fort over a few weeks, and hung out cooking/making spears, etc..
      Age 14: Bomb making phase. We'd save up firecrackers over the summer, and then empty them out into pipes, bottles, and other containers trying to get the biggest boom.
      Age 15: Planning some big school prank for weeks, and then carrying it out in the dead of night, all covert opt style with walkie talkies.
      Age 16: Car time! Camping, hiking, driving to out of the way places and exploring abandoned houses. One particular one house had a bunch of mystic symbols drawn all over the walls. That was a fun research project. Turned out to be a bunch of losers pretending to be satanists and drawing random 'evil' symbols.

      I don't know. It just sounds like maybe your friends weren't very imaginative.

    140. Re:My neice by treeves · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, in some cultures, phone-smashing is a sign of maturity.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  3. Suffering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would hope they're enjoying every minute of their addiction.

  4. God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by geekmux · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...mass suicides of students will likely result from the lack of being tethered to their Shitter and Fakebook accounts.

    I really feel for the humans who literally live online and nowhere else. It is sad. Very sad.

    1. Re:God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I really feel for the humans who literally live online and nowhere else. It is sad. Very sad.

      Did you learn nothing from watching The Matrix? If they're happy, who cares? It seems sad for those of us that enjoy going outside once in a while, but at the same time, internet addicts probably think I'm sad for enjoying walking and exercise..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by NoSleepDemon · · Score: 1

      The difference being that your body will last a lot longer if you absorb sunlight and exert a little physical strain on it once in a while. Every person I know who is an internet recluse looks and smells like a potatoe. It simply comes with the territory.

    3. Re:God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I really feel for the humans who literally live online and nowhere else. It is sad. Very sad.

      Did you learn nothing from watching The Matrix? If they're happy, who cares? It seems sad for those of us that enjoy going outside once in a while, but at the same time, internet addicts probably think I'm sad for enjoying walking and exercise..

      If internet addicts think that we're sad for enjoying the real physical world, then the infection/disease of internet addiction is FAR worse than I thought.

      The fact that society is slowly morphing into couch potatoes who lock themselves inside a virtual world is what is truly sad. What's next, will the window manufacturers go out of business because they'll be no point in building homes with windows anymore?

    4. Re:God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      I wonder if cell phones and texting aren't at least leading to kids being more on the go now, and thus getting a bit more exercise than their predecessors, who were pretty much chained to desktop computers for their online fix.

    5. Re:God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      > mass suicides of students will likely result from the lack of being tethered to their Shitter and Fakebook accounts.

      Don't laugh, it's happened before, well not suicides but numerous panic children running through the school grounds trying to get a cellphone connection when entire south Santa Clara county cellphone/internet system went down from the infamous April 2009 cable cut. One of the amateur radio guys provided assistance (local govt emergency managers had hams stationed at schools, parks, other major public areas) said all these kids running out the buildings through the yards holding their cellphones high trying to "get some bars" and many were crying.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    6. Re:God forbid we get attacked via EMP... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Nah, EMP won't do that. Some thought an infrasound pulse could tether you to the shitter, but Mythbusters busted that one.

  5. I'm not addicted! by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I told myself to go without internet for 1 hour... to prove that I am not addicted. And I am here on Slashdot to tell you all that I'm almost there! 55 min already... ... oh, damn.

    1. Re:I'm not addicted! by Zandamesh · · Score: 2

      That's nothing, I can go without internet 8 hours each day!

      --
      Lo and behold, for I am a sig!
    2. Re:I'm not addicted! by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, I can go without internet 8 hours each day!

      Impressive!
      I still check my facebook between naps.

    3. Re:I'm not addicted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you play with childhood toys?

    4. Re:I'm not addicted! by masterwit · · Score: 1

      I am just now going to bed after posting this at 2:15am with a test in mathematics at 9:30 tomorrow.

      I need help and I say that in the most honest way unfortunately... as I also post on Slashdot to comment on my terrible sleep disorder.

      To be honest I've considered putting my computer outside my room at night to force me to sleep.

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
  6. Time to be parents again by LS1+Brains · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know, it really is easy to "forget" your kids are over-doing something when they're NOT driving you nuts. :) But I digress, as parents, we need to set limits on our kids. Our 12 year old is, like most, always wanting to either be on the 'net on his laptop, on his cell phone texting whoever, watching TV, or playing the Xbox. Guess what - we limit his time with each, and send his butt OUTSIDE! The worst thing we can do as parents is to let them grow up without exploring the world around them, and that includes nature.

    1. Re:Time to be parents again by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      don't limit too much.
      if you limit just right, then there's only time for playing, but never to finish, and no time for finding out how the game works.
      and seriously, I'd have been better off skipping high school and staying at home coding.

      anyhow, reading the news was never a sin before the news started getting unfiltered and from the net.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Time to be parents again by ack154 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article is about college students though... people who are supposed to be responsible for themselves. And while I agree that the parents have a part in this in earlier years, once they're out on their own, there needs to be some self control involved.

      I do find it amusing that they felt so disconnected from their friends, yet no one thought to place an actual phone call to try to meet up with their friends? No media, sure... but they could use a phone as a phone, no?

    3. Re:Time to be parents again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our 12 year old is, like most, always wanting to either be on the 'net on his laptop, on his cell phone texting whoever, watching TV, or playing the Xbox.quote>

      One wonders if having access at this young of an age might contribute to this disturbing trend. When I grew up I didn't even have a TV, I knew computers existed but only in a vague theoretical sense. Now kids literally grow up with this technology before they ever learn social skill's of their own, possibly never even learning social skills. Really that trend doesn't surprise me at all, this is how kids have learned to communicate.

      I'm not certain whats more disturbing; that this is the new way people socialize, or that I evidently don't know how to socialize in the modern world.

    4. Re:Time to be parents again by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      It's a little unclear, but the first paragraph of the article (as well as the summary) mentions "cellphones, social media and the Internet" - if they were denied access to all three (the second as a function of the last, of course) then I'm not surprised they felt cut off; if you don't happen to have memorised a large swathe of seemingly arbitrary numbers to punch in to a landline phone, you are cut off without tech.

    5. Re:Time to be parents again by fermion · · Score: 1

      What I see is that parents are not really willing to impose consequences. The example given, where the child is told to play in a different manner, is not really relevant to school, where the choice is between work and play. A more common problem I see is where the child is given a phone for 'safety', but then when the child abuses the phone it is not taken away. I am not in a position to critizize, but it seems to me that if, for example, a child is failing, and the online record shows that several texts are sent during class, this might indicate that the child is failing because they are playing rather than because the teacher is not doing their job. Yet parents are afraid to let kids go to school without a phone, preferring that the kids remain uneducated.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Time to be parents again by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I couldn't have a cell phone until I could pay for it and every minute of use, and I don't see why it should be any different for kids now. The other thing is that any sort of 'allowance' should be tied to grades as well as chores, so if they start failing their money dries up. Put these things together and any problems should self-correct. I know it's how I will approach my daughter when she starts school.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    7. Re:Time to be parents again by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      anyhow, reading the news was never a sin before the news started getting unfiltered and from the net.

      Spending 12 hrs per day reading the news was always a sin.

    8. Re:Time to be parents again by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and seriously, I'd have been better off skipping high school and staying at home coding.

      I highly doubt it ... at that age, the last thing you need to be is encouraged to withdraw from further human contact, hide in your basement, and code.

      As annoying as it is, some of the socialization you learn in high school and beyond actually do prepare you to interact with people in the real world. Even coders occasionally need to be in meetings with normal humans -- and I've seen a couple of guys who were completely incapable of that kind of interaction and experienced problems with it later on in life.

      Hell, I've seen guys in their 30's/40's lose their job because the client more or less looked at them and said to never send them back because they were lousy face to face.

      You will almost never be able to survive without learning how to interact; as the old saying goes ... try to be more outgoing, try to stare at the other person's shoes. Maybe even look up from time to time. ;-)

      Don't undervalue how useful it will be to be able to interact with new people in a business setting ... it will come up more than you think.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Time to be parents again by Mascot · · Score: 2

      What does he do OUTSIDE? Hang at the local mall or gas station?

      My point being, kids differ. When I was 12, I had no interest in sports or any other activities that required me to be outside. Luckily, my parents were ok with my interests being in books and electronics. Didn't mean I was in the house all the time, but when I wasn't I was usually in someone else's. There's no inherent value in being "outside" if that word only means "not in the house". It's what you _do_ outside that matters. Had I been forced outside, I would've just hung at the local mall or whatever. I can't see any decent argument for how a mall trumps a good book. Or even a bad book. "Being social" isn't a valid argument, because that's the people you're with, not where you are.

      It's a parent's responsibility to expose their kids to variation, then encourage them in whatever interest the kid chooses. Guide, not force. Unless, of course, the kid's downright endangering themselves.

    10. Re:Time to be parents again by geekoid · · Score: 1

      blah blah blah, kids these days, blah blah blah.

      You are applying the 'logic' of a bill paying adult to a young child. If you're daughter has any backbone at all,you will fail.

      What do you do when you take all the money and they still refuse to do anything because they are making a point?
      When yo take away shows, computer, movie, all the toys. so she only has left some cloths a bed and a blanket?

      It's more complicated the you think, and I highly advise getting some sort of real, educated, expert, professional to talk about child discipline.

      OTOH, maybe your daughter will be a week willed girl who will go through life doing what ever a person holding a dollar tells her to do.

      I certainly hope not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Time to be parents again by tepples · · Score: 1

      I couldn't have a cell phone until I could pay for it and every minute of use, and I don't see why it should be any different for kids now.

      Under your framework, how is a child below a state's legal age to work supposed to call home and ask the parent to please pick the child up at x location?

    12. Re:Time to be parents again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know, it really is easy to "forget" your kids are over-doing something when they're NOT driving you nuts. :) But I digress, as parents, we need to set limits on our kids. Our 12 year old is, like most, always wanting to either be on the 'net on his laptop, on his cell phone texting whoever, watching TV, or playing the Xbox. Guess what - we limit his time with each, and send his butt OUTSIDE! The worst thing we can do as parents is to let them grow up without exploring the world around them, and that includes nature.

      There is a problem with that ideology. You take the things your kid loves to do and restrict their access to it. This just causes resentment towards you and a greater desire to do something they have been told not to (or limited to in this case.) If you see a big red button that says "DO NOT PRESS" with no explanation, the first thought that comes to your mind is "PRESS THE BUTTON!!" Humans, by nature, want to do what they are told not to. I am not saying that disciplining your kids or providing boundaries is bad. It most certainly is not, but should only be done in the cases where a positive example cannot be given by your own actions and then followed by your child’s desire to be with you and like you. If you spend the time with your kids that you should be, they would be inclined to look up to you and follow your example. "...send his butt OUTSIDE!" In this remark you are indicating to everyone that you are forcing your child to do something that you yourself are not doing.

      I have a 1.5 year old that watches me lift weights and in return wants to lift weights too. He will grab a 5 pound dumbbell and proudly do a deadlift while looking to Daddy for approval. He does what he sees Daddy do. Now the other end of the spectrum, I am an avid network administrator and gamer. When he sees Daddy playing a video game or programming a router, he is no happier than when he is sitting in the seat next to me on his Mom's laptop pretending to do the same thing, again all the while looking to Daddy for approval.

      Children’s actions can ALWAYS be linked directly to your own as a parent. If you have an anger problem, so will your child. If you have a computer addiction, so will your child. Lead by example first, then by discipline. At the age of 12 though, the foundation and some walls have already been set. In your position the process of leading by providing a proper example will be difficult as it will require rebuilding. First off you have to change your own life and provoke the child to be involved in the activities that you yourself are performing. Go biking and bring your kid. Go canoeing, hiking, to the gym.

      Never expect your child to do something that you are unwilling to do. I regard physical fitness very highly. I eat very nutritiously and workout every day. For this reason I know my kids will be very involved in physical activities and nutrition, without my need to provide painful incentives. I will have no need to "limit" my kid’s indoor activities as my example will have laid the foundation for them to govern themselves. So in respect to the title of your comment, “Time to be parents again,” I say no, “Time to ‘finally’ be parents.”

    13. Re:Time to be parents again by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 0

      You mean the logic of economy that underlies all of human society? Yes, I can see how that is somehow exclusive to age. Bullshit.

      Never mind the fact that I say it worked for me, and don't talk to me about backbone, I'm a goddamn bi atheist in a family where every generation is populated solely by Biblical literalists who thinks 'the gays' deserve to die. I have more backbone than you have brain cells.

      Work ethics are fundamental to a person's development, and I've seen enough of it in every legitimately successful person's history I know to be confident without the signature of some abstract theorist who gets paid to find new bullshit methods they can market to rubes on the self-help aisles of Barnes and Noble.

      So, fuck off troll, I'm glad at least to be reminded why you're on my foes list.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    14. Re:Time to be parents again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it really is easy to "forget" your kids are over-doing something when they're NOT driving you nuts. :) But I digress, as parents, we need to set limits on our kids. Our 12 year old is, like most, always wanting to either be on the 'net on his laptop, on his cell phone texting whoever, watching TV, or playing the Xbox. Guess what - we limit his time with each, and send his butt OUTSIDE! The worst thing we can do as parents is to let them grow up without exploring the world around them, and that includes nature.

      There is a problem with that ideology. You take the things your kid loves to do and restrict their access to it. This just causes resentment towards you and a greater desire to do something they have been told not to (or limited to in this case.) If you see a big red button that says "DO NOT PRESS" with no explanation, the first thought that comes to your mind is "PRESS THE BUTTON!!" Humans, by nature, want to do what they are told not to. I am not saying that disciplining your kids or providing boundaries is bad. It most certainly is not, but should only be done in the cases where a positive example cannot be given by your own actions and then followed by your child’s desire to be with you and like you. If you spend the time with your kids that you should be, they would be inclined to look up to you and follow your example. "...send his butt OUTSIDE!" In this remark you are indicating to everyone that you are forcing your child to do something that you yourself are not doing.

      I have a 1.5 year old that watches me lift weights and in return wants to lift weights too. He will grab a 5 pound dumbbell and proudly do a deadlift while looking to Daddy for approval. He does what he sees Daddy do. Now the other end of the spectrum, I am an avid network administrator and gamer. When he sees Daddy playing a video game or programming a router, he is no happier than when he is sitting in the seat next to me on his Mom's laptop pretending to do the same thing, again all the while looking to Daddy for approval.

      Children’s actions can ALWAYS be linked directly to your own as a parent. If you have an anger problem, so will your child. If you have a computer addiction, so will your child. Lead by example first, then by discipline. At the age of 12 though, the foundation and some walls have already been set. In your position the process of leading by providing a proper example will be difficult as it will require rebuilding. First off you have to change your own life and provoke the child to be involved in the activities that you yourself are performing. Go biking and bring your kid. Go canoeing, hiking, to the gym.

      Never expect your child to do something that you are unwilling to do. I regard physical fitness very highly. I eat very nutritiously and workout every day. For this reason I know my kids will be very involved in physical activities and nutrition, without my need to provide painful incentives. I will have no need to "limit" my kid’s indoor activities as my example will have laid the foundation for them to govern themselves. So in respect to the title of your comment, “Time to be parents again,” I say no, “Time to ‘finally’ be parents.”

      I guess it post as as Anonymous Coward if you aren't registered. Names Derek, I wrote it. Email: dadicus@gmail.com

    15. Re:Time to be parents again by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      When I was growing up admittedly cell phones were much more optional, but nonetheless you seem to have missed where I mentioned 'allowance'. The other thing is that child labor laws regardless, kids usually work for neighbors when they need extra money, I know I did. I would help them clean their houses/yards/cars ... take care of their pets when they went on vacation, things like that. Not to mention the occasional yard sale.

      Seems a real poverty of imagination... that if money doesn't come from some licensed employer it's somehow impossible to obtain. Ugh. No initiative, no intelligence...

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    16. Re:Time to be parents again by similar_name · · Score: 1

      OTOH, maybe your daughter will be a week willed girl who will go through life doing what ever a person holding a dollar tells her to do.

      On the opposite end of the spectrum 'your' child may be a stubborn brat who feels entitled to money for nothing.

    17. Re:Time to be parents again by tepples · · Score: 1

      nonetheless you seem to have missed where I mentioned 'allowance'.

      The $10 per week allowance that I got when I was a child wouldn't be enough for even the cheapest feature phone contract at $40 per month, let alone the cheapest smartphone contract at $70 per month. Or should I assume that allowances have inflated since then?

      The other thing is that child labor laws regardless, kids usually work for neighbors when they need extra money, I know I did. I would help them clean their houses/yards/cars

      As growing numbers of neighbors put up "no soliciting" signs to discourage salespeople and Jehovah's Witnesses, I imagine that this becomes less of an option for children. So would "I already had the other neighbor do everything; sorry." Children in my extended family have run into both.

      Not to mention the occasional yard sale.

      How much do yard sales actually rake in?

    18. Re:Time to be parents again by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And the surest, by far, determinant of "self control" (or pretty much anything crucial) ...how the first 2 decades of life looked like, the core of it being about family home.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    19. Re:Time to be parents again by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Under your framework, how is a child below a state's legal age to work supposed to call home and ask the parent to please pick the child up at x location?

      Is the child at a location unknown to the parents? Or is it that the time period is undefined? Or is the child unsupervised and therefore not able to ask an adult to call? There is very little reason for a child to have a cell phone unless their parents are just letting them loose. Even then it is not a reason it is just an excuse. Children didn't need cell phones 20 years ago and there is nothing that has fundamentally changed in the last 20 years to justify it now. It's a privileged and as such should be earned.

      The connection between behavior and consequences should be taught to children. It reminds me of a friend I had whose son was 10 years old. He was a menace. He never listened to his parents and his behavior was dangerous.It was very common to loose track of where he was only to find him doing something that he had been explicitly told not to do. Well, he wanted a knife and was told he wasn't old enough but when he turned 12 he could have one. IMHO it was a great opportunity to tell him he could have one when he showed he was responsible enough to have one and when he behaved. Instead they continued to teach their kid that there was no connection between behavior and consequences. I don't see them anymore and he is around 14 now. Last I heard he is suspended from school on a regular basis for violence. He even got in trouble for bringing his knife (that he got when he was 12) to school. I would bet my rent money that when he is an adult he will spend time in jail.

    20. Re:Time to be parents again by tepples · · Score: 1

      Or is it that the time period is undefined?

      Possibly.

      Or is the child unsupervised and therefore not able to ask an adult to call?

      The child may be visiting a household with no land line, where the supervising grown-ups have all switched to cell phones. My aunt has no land line, for example. Or the child might be on a long car trip, and the adult doesn't feel like pulling off the road into a parking lot to make a phone call.

      Children didn't need cell phones 20 years ago

      Twenty years ago, pay phones were more common because they had not yet been displaced by cell phones.

      He even got in trouble for bringing his knife (that he got when he was 12) to school.

      A blanket ban on knives in school discourages school lunch programs from offering healthy foods eaten with a knife and fork. Instead, school lunch programs serve overprocessed finger food or overprocessed slop that can be eaten with a spoon.

    21. Re:Time to be parents again by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Contract? Ha ha! When I was a kid I had to prepay, and be thrifty with the amount of time that accorded me.

      As for 'oh noes that one guy turned me down!' That's just another life lesson to be learned. Getting work isn't always easy. Kids need to learn that sometimes you have to work just to get work. Now in the interwebs age one could seek employment by Craigslist or similar. Yeah, yeah, I know, "but what about the evil child predator stalkers that lurk around every corner!?!?!!111!EINS!" Yet another place to learn some responsibility, for the parents as much as the children. In any scenario on or offline parents should vet or a bare minimum meet the people for whom their kids do work. If you haven't trained your kids how to handle potential predators beyond 'find an adult/call teh police lol!' Then that's just another failing. If they're old enough to work, they're old enough to learn self defense and carry a knife.

      Fuckin' hell what kind of crop of lazy, witless pansies is being raised around here?

      Oh and yard sales were always the big earners for me when I was growing up. You could net at least $30 or even more than $50 in a weekend selling things you'd grown out/tired of. It didn't hurt that we did it as a family at my maternal grandparents' place where their entire neighborhood had a massive sale every year that drew a lot of regular people.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    22. Re:Time to be parents again by similar_name · · Score: 1

      The child may be visiting a household with no land line, where the supervising grown-ups have all switched to cell phones. My aunt has no land line, for example. Or the child might be on a long car trip, and the adult doesn't feel like pulling off the road into a parking lot to make a phone call.

      So your aunt has a cell phone, if she's supervising, what's the problem? If the adult doesn't feel like pulling off the road to make a phone call then the call is probably not that important and IMO looses it's justification.

      Twenty years ago, pay phones were more common because they had not yet been displaced by cell phones.

      This is true, but that same ubiquity of cell phones makes it hard to claim that without a personal cell phone a child will have no way of contacting a parent. If that is truly the concern then there are cell phones that can only contact the parents and emergency numbers but those really aren't used much are they?

      A blanket ban on knives in school discourages school lunch programs from offering healthy foods eaten with a knife and fork. Instead, school lunch programs serve overprocessed finger food or overprocessed slop that can be eaten with a spoon.

      Yes yes a knife can be used for eating but that's not really the point here is it? First we're not talking about a table knife we're talking about a knife in a locker. Secondly, it's fine if you think knives should be allowed in school and it's a completely separate issue. Work to change that. But don't teach your kid that there aren't consequences for their behavior, including breaking rules whether you agree with them or not.

    23. Re:Time to be parents again by General_Fei · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a damn fine parent, then. I am a child of the 90's and early 00's, and while the electronic gadgetry hooked me in, I found a great way to balance it with sports. They complement each other well. I think the internet addiction is that the Effort --> Reward cycle is so short: want to know something, spend 3s Googling, and you get the serotonin reward. Technology makes that cycle shorter and shorter, and we get further conditioned by it. How to overcome? No idea.

    24. Re:Time to be parents again by tepples · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid I had to prepay

      Prepaid mobile phone service still expires if the subscriber doesn't add at least a minimum amount of money to the account per month.

      As for 'oh noes that one guy turned me down!' That's just another life lesson to be learned. Getting work isn't always easy.

      I understand that "getting work isn't always easy". In such a case, once a child has asked at all sixty households on the block, none of them offering a job, what should a child do?

      You could net at least $30 or even more than $50 in a weekend selling things you'd grown out/tired of.

      But how much did the merchandise selling for a total of "at least $30 or even more than $50" cost the child to buy in the first place, and where did the child come by that money?

    25. Re:Time to be parents again by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      You seem to think you speak for every prepaid service in the universe. I assure you that some do not.

      Further, your 'what if everybody turns them down?' scenario is unrealistic. If somebody seriously approached so many people and came up empty, I would question the approach far more than the real availability of work. (The same is true of adults for that matter.)

      Just because my parents never paid for my phone doesn't mean they didn't give me many other things (which I could eventually resell if I chose). It's not an all or nothing proposition. A parent can choose to provide something as a gift or make the child earn it themselves as they see fit. Applying the same approach to all things forever on either side would have a very negative effect on the child.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  7. Olds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look at the date of this article, Apr 23 2010.... Olds for nerds indeed.

    1. Re:Olds? by IB4Student · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some of us only go on the Internet once a year. Good luck with that addiction of yours :-/

    2. Re:Olds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my birthday you insensitive clod!

      Which all my friend on Facebook know of course! :D

  8. "phantom limb" by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 1

    Bit like not wearing a watch - you feel somewhat naked?

    meh.

    1. Re:"phantom limb" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      how do you wear a watch? You wear cloths, or you watch something. Wear watch something makes no sense.

      hah, I'm kidding. seriously does anyone under 25 wear a watch for any reason other then jewelry?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:"phantom limb" by Altus · · Score: 1

      There are lots of good reasons to wear a watch. For one thing, I can check my watch much faster than I can pull out my cell phone. For another thing, I can glance at my watch in a social situation without letting everyone around me know that I'm checking the time.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re:"phantom limb" by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      I'm 24 and have worn a watch since I was 18. For the same reasons that Altus mentioned: It's a lot quicker than pulling out my cell phone, and a lot more discreet in social situations.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    4. Re:"phantom limb" by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I generally know what time it is to within five minutes, and thus neither need phone nor watch unless real precision is required. Does that mean I win?

    5. Re:"phantom limb" by Altus · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I really want to know if its going to be 5 or 10 minutes till I get the fuck out of this meeting.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    6. Re:"phantom limb" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, there is actually no reference to a phantom limb in TFA.

  9. New culture perhaps? by Clsid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Bah, this is just bashing from people that cannot even understand a new culture developing in front of their very eyes, therefore anybody who uses technology extensively must be very sick. Right.

    1. Re:New culture perhaps? by icebrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's one thing to use technology extensively. It's another thing entirely when use of that technology becomes such a fixture or priority in someone's life that they wind up neglecting other important things in their lives--work, school, family, health, sleep, etc. When checking Facebook or Twitter or whatever becomes more important to you than anything else, when you manifest the same behaviors seen in alcoholics and drug addicts (anxiety from not being able to get your "fix", irrational or dangerous behavior to try and get access again, etc), that's when it becomes a problem.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  10. Not just kids by Xian97 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have several co-workers I see with their face buried in their phone every time I walk by their cube. Internet usage is monitored where I work (even this post) so they see it as a way to bypass the system. Before they put in Websense the same co-workers were on the web all day - they still are but now it's through their phones. The ones that were Internet addicted all went out and got smart phones when Internet usage started being monitored.

    1. Re:Not just kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is exactly why I advocate for a "open but monitor" internet filtering policy.

      Let people use their computers. You advise users that you monitor internet, and you basically want to cut them some slack. Just like most people have hardwired phones at their desks, most don't talk to family/friends all day.

      Once they use their smart phones, it's harder to prove their slacking off.

    2. Re:Not just kids by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      But this in itself is a symptom of something deeper. Somewhere along the line, the system has failed. The employees may not feel valued and slack off as a means of protest. They could be under paid or suffer from toxic leadership, so they perform to expectations and slack off at every opportunity. Worst, the person responsible for hiring could suck at their job and hire idiots who don't know what they're doing.

      Either way, this isn't a problem solved by changing internet policy. It needs a much bigger change, much higher up the food chain.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Not just kids by tophermeyer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some of that depends on the culture of the specific organization.

      There is lots of literature indicating people become more productive over time if they are allowed to blend personal and work time. Being hunched over a keyboard for 9 hours a day gets a lot of man-hours out of people, but allowing people a little bit of freedom to manage their own time and pursue personal interests during the day can really empower people to approach their jobs more efficiently and professionally.

      I would want my team to be held accountable for work output, not just hours worked. If people want to shop or check some geeky news site during the workday and maintain a high level of performance, let them. If they stop producing then you have a problem, but that is true with or without internet.

    4. Re:Not just kids by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Once they use their smart phones, it's harder to prove their slacking off.

      Once you have no metric for measuring productivity it's harder to prove their slacking off. :) I was listening to the radio and there was a segment about telecommuting. The number one complaint by management was that they wouldn't be able to know if their employees where working. The counter to that was that if you measure your employees work by how busy they 'look' then you really have no idea who's really working and who's not.

      When I worked in tech support I would occasionally be asked into HR because I was too often seen wandering around the building instead of at my desk. I just had to remind them that I took 60-80 calls a day as opposed to the average of 30 and I maintained a better than average approval rating from our customers. I did my job much better than most and if they wanted me to take even more calls they could pay me more. Of course they also once complained that when I requested an RMA my average call time was only 10 minutes and that I should be spending more time diagnosing the problem. Once again I had to remind them that my defective rate for returned merchandise was 95%, much better than the average of 60%.

      If managers would look at results instead of just trying to control their employees there wouldn't be a need for controlling internet access or any of the other arbitrary rules that companies make. This is very similar to laws against driving with a cell phone. There's no need for it. There's only a need to respond to the consequences of someone being negligent.

  11. The Borg solved all this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With collective conciousness...who needs texts.

    1. Re:The Borg solved all this by kvezach · · Score: 1

      And like all proper internet addicts, they don't have care how they look either :p

  12. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I'm addicted in a sense that I prefer life with the internet than life without it, but I don't NEED it to get through the day. There's reading ( although the kindle helps by giving internet ), listening to music ( although mp3 players love the internet ), and any number of things outside. For instance, I've got some bulbs to plant in the flower beds this weekend. Once it's not cold and windy here ( it is April, where are the warm days? ), I'll be spending more time away from my computer and desk and being outside doing things like walking all over the township or maybe finally getting a new bike ( last one I had was before 2004 and doesn't fit my height anymore ) and start riding it around places.

    I'd also like to go out places this summer - go do some semi-local caves, hit the beach, go to some state parks, and generally just be outside and living. I spent all of my last summer between work and landscaping at the house so I'd actually like to go out and do things this year.

    Could I live without the internet? Of course, there's plenty of things to do that don't need it. Could I live without the computer? Technically I'd be alive, but at a minimum I'd like to be able to add or remove music from the mp3 player and get pictures off the memory card for the camera. A simple wall adapter takes care of the rest of the technology needs to charge them.

    1. Re:Meh by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I wish I could find more people like you.

      My housemates have spent the last couple of months playing some computer game, even when it was sunny outside (South England in March -- you have to make the most of the sunny days!).

      (Of course, I have friends except the people I live with, but housemates are the best positioned for kicking a ball round a park on a Sunday morning, or cycling to the nature reserve.)

  13. Meanwhile... by Senes · · Score: 1

    Their parents' generation is addicted to their cars, while their grandparents' generation is addicted to their newspapers.

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      A little defensive, are we? Really, this one's not a generational thing.

    2. Re:Meanwhile... by symes · · Score: 1

      Their parents' generation is addicted to their cars, while their grandparents' generation is addicted to their newspapers.

      Not really. Certainly there is some reward from reading a paper, driving a car, and so on. And (many) thoeries of addiction see immediate rewards as key to addiction. Where they differ is in frequency. Receiving a text message from a friend is mostly a positive experience - that little ping indicates someone somewhere thinks you are relevant. That is very slightly rewarding, just like cars and newspapers. However, the issue with sms is that it can be a very high frequency activity. Small, regular high frequency rewards are some of the ways to nurture addiction. A bit like slot machines, those that are most effective appear to be those that give a little prize often. So what we end up with, with sms, is clusters of people supporting each others addiction. My prediction is that buffering messages and delivering them in one go might reduce frequency and therefore reduce addiction.

    3. Re:Meanwhile... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Classic stimulus-response type addictions are far more static than using the internet or cell phones. There's no intellectual stimulation from a drug habit. It's hard to call something an addiction if that "something" happens to be dozens of different things, despite looking the same to an outside observer. The "withdrawl" from its absence isn't from the device itself, it's from withdrawl from social circles, information resources, and entertainment tools. This would happen if you took those things away from anyone, it's just that today's youth have a central point of access (or failure) for all those things.

      Now, this isn't meant to justify rude behavior. Personally, I don't answer personal telephone calls or text messages if I'm physically conversing with someone, and generally walk away if someone does that to me. Basic social etiquette doesn't change with new ways of doing things. You prioritize your present company.

  14. Horrifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should all encourage these children to go back to alcohol and drugs. This addiction to exchanging information is just too dangerous.

    I mean, if they are CONSUMING information, they might learn things that we don't want them to learn, and if they are PRODUCING information, they may say things we don't want them to say.

    Oh, this whole thing just makes me so crazy I almost fainted, fell off my dinosaur, and broke my wooden underwear.

    1. Re:Horrifying by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      I mean, if they are CONSUMING information

      The point is they aren't. They are doing things like playing games, talking and texting friends online, and other social media outlets. There's no consumption of info except status updates of friends, and looking at games.

    2. Re:Horrifying by McTickles · · Score: 0

      The point is that you cannot CONSUME information.

      It is a horrible diet indeed, choking on bytes? not for me thanks.

  15. this story is a year old by tach315 · · Score: 1

    why is a year old story being featured on Slashdot ? really this place is going down hill, I will have to only use my ipad to check those up to date websites.

    --
    tach315
    1. Re:this story is a year old by PsiCTO · · Score: 1

      why is a year old story being featured on Slashdot ? really this place is going down hill, I will have to only use my ipad to check those up to date websites.

      Ya, I picked up on that when I submitted, but the story was/is being reported on CBC radio with updated interviews and such, AFAICT.

      So, I thought it was topical for today, a least for those of us listening... hard to get that across into /. , I know.

      Anyway, /. pushed the submission through, comments are building, so there must be some relevancy :-)

    2. Re:this story is a year old by camperdave · · Score: 1

      ... and what's up with the interface? Earlier this week the entire site would cause my mouse pointer to go into "link hover" mode (or whatever it's called) and I would have to drill down through all the parent comments to be able to click on a link. On every other page, if I click on a link with my mouse wheel, it opens that link in a new tab. Slashdot has that action blocked for some reason. And when I preview a comment, the entire thing is black on yellow. Why Slashdot? Why?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:this story is a year old by biek · · Score: 1

      I thought these "information junkie" articles were an artifact of the 90s.

  16. My name is ___ and... by Xacid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can say I personally went through this. Once I realized what was happening (not going out as much anymore, gaining weight/getting out of shape, neglecting my family, etc) I ended up shedding a lot of these things over the course of about a year. First cable tv went (hell, I only watched 3 channels most of the time and quitting would save me money), then WoW (again, would save me money, and was getting stale).

    However, these weren't my biggest addictions in the slightest, but I wasn't quite ready to give up on facebook and similar social networking things. It didn't seem like much at the time. Afterall, I was still being "social" and wasn't becoming reclusive. It was essentially a substitute for hanging out with real people in real life. And besides - a lot of us got together on Fridays for movie night. Thing was - even during these movie nights I'd still be checking facebook despite everyone close to me was right in front of me.

    The straw that broke the camel's back was over a benign status I posted: "Aww snap, time for daddy day care!" as my wife was going out with some friends and it was going to be one of my first times watching our baby daughter solo. Two women somehow took offense to this comment and proceeded to man-bash like crazy, nevermind that I'm actually sticking around and being a father. It boiled down to one woman basically calling her husband worthless and both of them saying I was a shitty father ("It's not daycare, it's PARENTING!"). And I know, I know - I should know better than to get riled up over trolling - but these are people I know in real life - straight up being offensive. The only person who could have came to my rescue was my wife. She sees all this when she gets home and is like "wtf is wrong with those bitches?" I reply "well, do something!". I needed help. I was getting attacked by two angry hens!

    She replies "LOL" in the facebook thread.

    I fucking LOST it.

    I counted on the one person who could get me out of this mess - save my name on the internets - and she didn't pull through. How dare she? ...

    The next morning I felt like such a goddamned tool once I put all this into perspective. I came to the conclusion that I was far too invested in things like facebook and virtual people that I promptly initiated the processes for deleting most of my online identity.

    Around the same time I was reading a book (How Pleasure Works by Paul Bloom) that really forces you to think about how you put value into the things around you. So I had to ask "does x add value to my life?" As a result, here I am still on slashdot, still have my cellphone, but I'm outside damned near everyday, starting getting back into playing hockey and taking it more seriously, seeing more of family, and in way better shape than I was.

    Overall, I'm much happier and feel like I've gained a much higher quality of life. I'd say anyone thinking about the same - go for it and never look back.

    1. Re:My name is ___ and... by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, they I was miserable and changed my life, there fore everyone else doing what I was doing is miserable and should also change.

      Coupled with the 'outside is real life fallacy'.

      Sprinkled with a healthy dose of 'I have no fucking clue what addiction means'.

      Hey, your happy, good fro you. I just hate it when people fall into what I like to call "Hindsight is a lying bitch" syndrome.

      It's a pretty telling example that you can't explain to people what you meant with daddy daycare, and if they can't except it, stop communicating with them. I doubt your response was duo to facebook more then it was do to you not controlling your anger.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:My name is ___ and... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      However, these weren't my biggest addictions in the slightest, but I wasn't quite ready to give up on facebook and similar social networking things. It didn't seem like much at the time. Afterall, I was still being "social" and wasn't becoming reclusive. It was essentially a substitute for hanging out with real people in real life. And besides - a lot of us got together on Fridays for movie night. Thing was - even during these movie nights I'd still be checking facebook despite everyone close to me was right in front of me.

      What is amusing is that you've hit the nail right on the head. I am sitting here writing this post and looking at my Facebook chat list. Most of the people who I used to be out with on a Wed night are online on Facebook. More to the point, things like MSN and ICQ that used to be busy aren't. All those people moved over to Facebook as soon as it had chat because it has "games". I bet if I actually bring up the page I'll see dozens of game updates and other nonsense from them.

      Another point is that the Internet brings easy (free!) access to content. You can download a movie in under an hour and queue up 2 or 3 more while you're watching the first. I have friends who literally have piles of terabyte hard disks with all the crap they've downloaded. They invest countless hours into devising cataloging schemes so they can know they have something and not download it again (not so they can find it and access it).

      These were the very same friends who used to go out instead of sitting home watching downloaded crap.

      And yes, I'm aware the irony of pointing out online that everyone is online and not going out anymore.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    3. Re:My name is ___ and... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's called going Emo, we all do it online, once in awhile. Some peeps do it all the time, most don't.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    4. Re:My name is ___ and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    5. Re:My name is ___ and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, your pessimism is totally delusional.

      Understand that the communication platform is the problem, leading to increased fear and anger responses due various reasons. The addiction that he has managed to become aware of (and impressively explain it) is also part of what makes it so easy to get angry. I can explain if needed.

    6. Re:My name is ___ and... by Xacid · · Score: 2

      "It's a pretty telling example that you can't explain to people what you meant with daddy daycare, and if they can't except it, stop communicating with them. I doubt your response was duo to facebook more then it was do to you not controlling your anger."

      There actually wasn't any anger involved with this particular thread (which, I'll admit, is unusual for me - but these were a couple individuals I respected before all this went down). I pretty much said the initial post, let them rant for about 10 exchanges, interjected with "hey guys, not cool, you're getting borderline offensive here", was pretty much ignored and was continued to be flamed.

      If it'd just been some random person I probably would have simply blocked/deleted them. One was actually a really good friend of my wife's (and to her credit she's still a great friend to my wife) and the other was actually a mutual friend I had with someone else who I'd debate with often and respected intellectually.

      "I was miserable and changed my life, there fore everyone else doing what I was doing is miserable and should also change"

      That's not really what I said at all. I essentially said if you're considering the change then by all means go for it. If you're doing fine balancing it with real life - then rock on, brotha. Compare it to people who can drink socially vs. full-out alcoholics.

      "I just hate it when people fall into what I like to call "Hindsight is a lying bitch" syndrome."

      This I'm unfamiliar with - care to clarify?

    7. Re:My name is ___ and... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      "And yes, I'm aware the irony of pointing out online that everyone is online and not going out anymore."

      That's the best part, aint it? :) For me it was more about finding balance and getting away from the things that felt like they required large chunks of my time - not so much swearing off the internet completely. I still see the utility of the tech - I just know I was being irresponsible with my own in my use of it.

    8. Re:My name is ___ and... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      We actually had a long chat after all this stuff went down pretty much covering that topic. It was definitely a major factor for why I decided to suddenly swear it off - I saw it could be something that'd effectively destroy our marriage. From her perspective she saw it for what it was - just a couple people being assholes on the internet. It was me who was taking such a large investment in their words, however.

    9. Re:My name is ___ and... by masterwit · · Score: 1

      I was going to have a long drawn out comment saying congratulatory agreeing statements, but I think it could best be summed up with...

      Cheers, I agree.

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    10. Re:My name is ___ and... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Noted! :)

  17. War on the Internet in 3, 2, 1... by Lord+Juan · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait...

  18. Addiction is an escape from something by slackzilly · · Score: 0

    I use the internet a lot, mostly to read about a subject I am curious about. But often, if I am not doing something, I go to the interweb just because I am bored. If I am outside, on the bus or whatever, I use my smartphone to check the same wepages I looked at before I left. It is out of boredom/needing something to do. Just like addiction to a substance is (often) an escape from something, internet addiction is too.

    --
    - "If one man can create that much hate, you can only imagine how much love we as a togetherness can create."
  19. Isolation studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how those results compare to long term isolation studies, like that they put astronauts through back in the Apollo days.

    I suspect that the Internet isn't any more "addictive" than social contact is in general. The actual thenominon here is that theres a generation gap in the means of communication. If you've grown up always having the ability to talk to whoever you want regardless of location, you never develop skills like pretending not to find the people around you boring, because your ability to socialize isn't limited to the people around you.

    1. Re:Isolation studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you never develop skills like pretending not to find the people around you boring

      Why the fuck is this considered a skill? This is messed up. Our society is built on bullshit and lies.

  20. I know that feeling by Probie · · Score: 1

    I played so much bejeweled once that when i looked at peoples faces I was connecting sections of their face into three.

    --
    Who? Who is but the form following the function of what and what I am is a man in a mask.
    1. Re:I know that feeling by box4831 · · Score: 1

      I have a similar problem, whenver I'm talking to someone I want to hack them to bits with a pickaxe and collect their bloody body parts.


      yes I've gotten minecraft recently, how could you tell?

      --
      Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
    2. Re:I know that feeling by Probie · · Score: 1

      we should combine forces, you can hack people up and i will squish there body parts into three's =S

      --
      Who? Who is but the form following the function of what and what I am is a man in a mask.
    3. Re:I know that feeling by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Try playing an all-night session of Doom. Every time I closed my eyes I was running through hallways shooting stuff.

      Then I told the buddy I was hanging out with, "Whenever I close my eyes all I see is Doom," and he thought I was having a mental breakdown until I could explain it properly.

    4. Re:I know that feeling by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      I have a similar problem, whenver I'm talking to someone I want to hack them to bits with a pickaxe and collect their bloody body parts. yes I've gotten minecraft recently, how could you tell?

      I generally feel this way when talking to co-workers, but I have no knowledge of this 'minecraft' of which you speak.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  21. dissimilar to sex gambling religious compulsions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do chemicals get all the bad pr? are prescription narcotics better? sex? as much as we can stand is good? gambling? supports ??? old time religion? yikes

    what about excitement?

    good thing the current chosen ones life0cidal religious holycost is ending abruptly, soon, so we can all get back to rehabbing ourselves?

    we'll all feel better after the genuine native american elders rising bird of prey leadership initiative shows us (teepeeleaks etchings) how much of what we do without a thought is bad for all of us.

    drop your weapons. you have the right....

  22. I thought about what to say... by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

    And I found out that I do not care for real people anymore. Or the world outside. Guess it's too late for me.

  23. Social interaction pandemic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's social interaction FFS! My mom is addicted to that too - she keeps spending time interacting with her friends and family directly, through phone or other digital devices and when she was in hospital with her dose of social interaction reduced, she showed signs of withdrawal problems.

    Calling social interaction addictive is like calling breathing addictive.

  24. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US Teen Pregnancy Rate at Record Low, CDC, and Everybody Else Reports.

    "The US teen pregnancy rate in 2009, the latest year for which data are available, hit its lowest since tracking began 70 years ago."

    It was even mentioned on the Internet: https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=U.S.+teen+pregnancy+rate+at+record+low

  25. What about TV addiciton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while I don't doubt that Internet addiction is becoming an issue, as someone from a younger generation, I think it's ridiculous that people decry Internet Addiciton, when for the last 40 years the majority of north america has had TV addiction. Or in the case of some individuals Car addiction.

    Is Internet addiction going to destroy society? No more than TV addiction did. At least with Internet addiction there is a small amount of interacting with others.

  26. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    Do these "statistics" come with a source, by chance. I know the #37 on Healthcare quality is from a study that, instead of comparing number of people cured of illness per capita or something, came from a study that gave massive bonuses on the ranking to contries with socialized healthcare. Remove this bonus, and the US is number 1 again.

  27. Just ebcasue you miss something by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that's a useful tool you used everyday doesn't mean you are addicted.
    I could take their clothes away and they would have a strong desire to get them back. That doesn't mean they are addicted to cloths.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. College students? by internerdj · · Score: 1

    Excellent, now all I have to do is quit grad school and I'll be able to leave slashdot long enough to get some work done.

  29. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    I am sure one can add or remove some metrics used in coming up with these figures to mane any nation come #1.

  30. mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, no? by Nyder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bullshit. You bitch slap the person till the get in fucking line.

    I was a herion addict for 15 years or so of my life. I find that someone considers even comparing drug addiction to cell phone addiction to be very fucking insulting.

    For example, when I would get put in jail (and i would, on occasion, because thats where real addiction can land you), I would get physically sick without my dope. I'd end up puking, having the runs, not able to eat, wishing i was dead, or better, that i could get well (which I didn't realize at the time, i was getting well, by not using!).

    Anyways, this is bullshit, and insult to anyone who's built their life back up after losing it to a truelly addictive thing.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  31. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    " Things like not respecting parents or elders,"

    why should we? I have no respect for people who are assholes, regardless of age. Just because you happen to survive to get old doesn't mean you should be worshiped. I have always hated the antiquated fallacy. and yes, I am old.

    Teen pregnancy has trended down for the last 20 years.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. I'm thirteen... by DMFNR · · Score: 1

    ...and what is this.

  33. Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we quit whining about how people are "addicted" to this stuff?

    Who cares? What's the problem?

    If people want to feel really connected, that is their prerogative. Who gets to decide how much is "unhealthy" -- whatever that even means -- and are we planning on stopping people from going to Facebook or twitter more than a few times a day?

    If people feel like they are on the Internet too much, they have the power to stop themselves. If they're okay with it, then let them live their lives the way they want. And fuck you if you're going to try to make the decision for me.

  34. "Addiction" by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Really, is this what we're calling everything where people can't exercise a little self-discipline?

    Our culture seriously needs a giant cup of "Grow the Fuck Up".

    --
    -Styopa
  35. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's also no wonder that 85% of U.S. soldiers are dumber than the average YouTube commenter. Have you seen the communities these people are recruited from?

    In fact, my above made-up statistic might just apply to the voluntary enlistees of all militaries in this world. Especially those Eastern.

  36. Re: 8 hours a day by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Start a blog with your EEG's live over the net!

    www.Ihaveadream.com

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  37. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

    It's not only cell phones. It's the 'bad' habits as well. Things like not respecting parents or elders, the 'me, me, me' attitude the teen pregnancies, the spending beyond our means for both government and a good chunk of the population.

    One of the only fond memories of have of my High School Latin class was translating a missive from the Roman senate to the people bemoaning how young people are not as respectful to their elders as they used to be, and that their society was becoming morally bankrupt.

    Every generation looks at their children as being somehow increasingly disrespectful and making poor moral decisions. That perception is weirdly constant.

    Also, you have completely misrepresented this link:

    It's no wonder that 85% of US soldiers in Iraq believe that they are there to get revenge for 9/11.

    The actual claim made was that a poll in 2006 indicated that 85% of soldiers believed they were sent over there to retaliate, not that they are currently in 2011 deployed there in retaliation.

    And finally, Zogby International is one of the worst international polling organizations in the world (leading questions, selection biases in their polled populations, etc). And the oilempire site you linked looks like the online Wal-Mart of conspiracy theories. Is JFK somehow responsible for peak oil by orchestrating 9/11? I don't know, but that website makes me suspect that somebody thinks so.

  38. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Just because you happen to survive to get old doesn't mean you should be worshiped.

    Who asked that the 'old' be worshiped? I haven't seen any [yet]. What I have seen is a salient call for respect. No wonder our older population are so depressed and stressed out.

    You should visit some retirement homes to see for yourself. It's sad. The bad thing is that we're all headed there. God help us.

  39. Scouts by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    While I can't stand the organization for its politics, policies, origins, higher-up administrators and more recent scandals, I will admit that going out and camping once a month with zero electronics helped give me the patience I need to proudly say amongst a group of internet addicted college-student peers: "Nah, I'll check [my e-mail] later."

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  40. Long enough to save point? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Under your framework, do you make sure that you allow your 12 year old long enough time on the 'net to finish his homework? And do you make sure that you allow long enough time on the Xbox to get to a save point? I seem to remember The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask for Nintendo 64, which was notorious for not allowing a save until 72 minutes in, at a time when some parents were limiting daily (or even weekly!) video game time to 60 minutes.

    1. Re:Long enough to save point? by LS1+Brains · · Score: 1

      He gets plenty of time with the 'tech, we're not cruel. :) Oddly enough, I'm his favorite Xbox buddy. If I won't go up and play, he quickly loses interest. Strange, I know. His time isn't limited by strict minute boundaries in most cases - bedtime is firm on weeknights, and he plans accordingly. Otherwise it's a simple "hey you've been in here a while, why not head outside and see what the other kids are doing?" We don't get much protest, and shortly after he's bounding down the stairs and out the door.

      I'm also a big proponent of "figure it out." This weekend he mentioned his laptop didn't work, to which I simply asked "what's wrong with it?" It took a few iterations of "I don't know," to him reading out error messages, me urging him to Google what they meant (on his phone!), and a few trips up and down the stairs, but he finally researched enough to figure out the drive had failed (DRDY error, bad block counts were skyrocketing). That earned him lots of praise and a new laptop to replace his old one.

  41. Compare to the Amish by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's one thing to use technology extensively. It's another thing entirely when use of that technology becomes such a fixture or priority in someone's life that they wind up neglecting other important things in their lives--work, school, family, health, sleep, etc.

    Which is exactly why the Amish choose not to use certain technologies such as home electric power and home telecommunications.

    anxiety from not being able to get your "fix"

    Does this include anxiety from not being able to get your "fix" of, say, electric light in the evening?

  42. sheesh! by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Can we as a society agree to stop misusing words that have very serious connotations like "Addiction"? Addiction is a very serious disease and using it to describe something as silly as people spending too much time online socializing than doing actual work or study belittles those that have true addictions.

    1. Re:sheesh! by matt_lethargic · · Score: 2

      NO. Addiction is not a disease! If it were it would be called a disease and not an addiction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addiction

  43. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by camperdave · · Score: 1

    US: First in a reverse alphabetical listing of all countries with the word "United" in their name! U-S-A! U-S-A!

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  44. This is a bad thing? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    "Students in the Maryland study also showed no loyalty to news programs, a news personality or news platform."

    So, students are actually taking news from sources on all sides and making a decision from themselves? How is this a bad thing?

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  45. This is a year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I eventually found the press release for this, and it's from April 2010

    http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/sociss/release.cfm?ArticleID=2144

    Why's this on Slashdot in April 2011?

  46. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe most of these #'s come from the CIA factbook, though don't quote me on that. As for the whole teen pregnancy comment, teen pregnancies have actually gone down in recent years, with the most recent actually being record lows.

  47. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your cellphone is not a drug. I used to suck dick for coke. Now that's an addiction. You ever suck some dick for your cellphone?

  48. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    I know the #37 on Healthcare quality is from a study that, instead of comparing number of people cured of illness per capita or something, came from a study that gave massive bonuses on the ranking to contries with socialized healthcare

    No, I think you are confusing what the "bonus" is. Perhaps if you measured quality of actually applied treatment, the US might be first, but socialized medicine doesn't get a bonus to measures of "how many" in cured, it _is_ a natural bonus when measuring of how many is cured (and average life-span). The difference in quality of treatment has be enormous, if treating everybody is not going to easily beat treating only the wealthiest.

    Let us imagine some numbers hopelessly exaggerated in your favour: Let us assume the US provides health-care for the 70% wealthiest, and cures 90% of all cases, that means 63% gets successful care. Now imagine Canada gives healthcare the 100% wealthiest, but has a MUCH low quality of treatment and only cures 70%, that means 70% gets successful care. 70% > 63% . Even if there was that great a difference in real-life (there really isn't), the citizens of Canada would get better treatment on _average_, even if those that _got_ treatment in the US was treated better.

  49. I was addicted over 10 years ago by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    I've been a netizen for 13 years, the most formative of which were during the height of the dot com bubble when I was in college. I was addicted long before smart phones and Facebook. But as I matured and realized that the Internet was 90% crap (like most of life), I found myself spending less and less time each day online. The same thing will happen to the majority of these college kids. If you use social media to enhance your real life relationships rather than substitute them, it's fine. My little circle of 20 or so friends and acquaintances in real life uses Facebook as our party planning hub these days. I think we have 8 events - real life events - spelled out for the next month alone.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  50. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

    Is anyone really bothered by these statistics? When you include countries that allow their under priviledged childeren run around on the streets and only the middle class and above are given an education then it's not a surprize to me when our less priviledged childeren are included in the study we come up short in comparison. If we threw the people that didn't care or gave up to the wild then we would look a hell of a lot better to. In America we try more then most to not only help the unfourtunate but to actually help them improve their life, we do this by holding them to the same standards as everyone else. This means that it doesn't matter if your parents are drunks or a drug addicts, we expect you to not give up and live off the street. Instead we force you to attend our public school system (we send kids that don't go to school to correctional facilities btw), to get at least a highschool degree and to make something of yourself. The problem is that not everybody is capable of this for one reason or another and others slip through the cracks in our imperfect system; this reflects poorly in our numbers. But screw the rest of the world we're doing the right thing.

  51. Wall-e by matt_lethargic · · Score: 1

    It's all a bit like those chairs in Wall-e, kids glued to their screens not knowing what its like in the 'real world' Go outside and play ffs! Make dens, build go karts, climb trees, get chased by the neighbourhood (*spelling) weirdo, get beaten up by the local bully (not not just hounded through social media sites)!

  52. "Suffering" from internet addiction? by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

    Suffering, really? I'm reminded of that scene from Office Space:

    Bob: "Looks like you've been missing a lot of work lately."
    Peter: "I wouldn't say I've been *missing* it, Bob."

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
  53. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Your cellphone is not a drug. I used to suck dick for coke. Now that's an addiction. You ever suck some dick for your cellphone?

    Word, I was homeless for years because of my drug habit.

    How did I quit my drugs?

    I took responsibilty for my actions.

    Ya, i know, we can't expect kids to be responsible.

    Mainly since we don't lead by example.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  54. Anyone else remembering Childhood's End by calmofthestorm · · Score: 2

    by Arthur C. Clarke? Not so much in what is happening, but by the older generation's bemoaning thereof.

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  55. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

    heroin addiction is mostly mental. hey after you were in jail and finished withdrawing, why did you start using again, once the worst was over? you were an addict for 15 years? did you realize, say 2 years in, that if you just stopped cold-turkey for 2 weeks you would then have no more physical dependence on it? was it worth doing it another 13 years in exchange for those 2 weeks of pain? (especially if you already had been through a few days of the worst in prison). true there are terrible physical withdrawal symptoms. but the biggest part of that addiction is a mental one. a much more powerful one than cell phone use, true, since it feels a heck of a lot better than texting does, but still mostly mental. disclaimer: i aint never done heroin.

  56. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Approximately 15% of the US population doesn't have health insurance, a problem which no other developed nation has as the rest all have universal healthcare systems. Are you seriously suggesting they SHOULDN'T get credit for that? I'm sure the US healthcare system is great if you can afford all the treatment you need, the problem is that so many people can't...

  57. Turnabout is fair play... by Itesh · · Score: 1

    How many of us are drinking our coffee while doing our daily digest of /. while at work? How many of you have answered an email while driving/watching your kids/insert your relevant activity here? Just because we are older and frequent different sites than "the kids" doesn't mean we aren't addicted in some fashion to the Internet and our technology devices either.

  58. Evolution, not addiction by wye43 · · Score: 1

    It has nothing to do with the Internet. As a kid/teen, going at the "official" family meetings is fkin boring. Especially meeting really old dudes. I'm far, far away from that young age, but I still remember it bored the begeesus out of me at that time.

    Stop forcing her to enjoy what you like and try to understand what she likes. Next time, try to take the "sulking" as a cry for help, not as an opportunity to bulldozer your way over her personality/thoughts/feelings, and you may avoid the tantrum. Oh wait, she a teen, you'll get the tantrum anyway :).

    Not only that the "new generation" likes different things, even different people of the same age like different stuff.

    Its called evolution, not addiction.

    1. Re:Evolution, not addiction by wye43 · · Score: 1

      As a parent, Internet is not your enemy, but your friend. Adapt to it: get a Facebook account and friend your kid. Get to know what he/she likes and what he/she is doing.

      Be an active part of the Internet life of your kid. Evolve

  59. This is not surprising... by xaoslaad · · Score: 1

    This is not surprising to me. With the costs of tuition going up, I am willing to bet most students are also working a fair number of hours. I work a job that normally requires 40+ hours a week, and come home to 9-12 credits a semester, three semesters a year. Weekends and evenings are filled with writing papers, taking tests, doing research, coding, and reading books. I don't subscribe to facebook, myspace, twitter, or any other social media BS, because I simply don't have time to care about what anyone else is doing - but I'm 33 and married - I gave up on socializing a long long time ago. Even still the endless routine is maddening sometimes. I can at least see the light at the end of the tunnel; basically 10 weeks of actual school left.

    You can imagine though, that kids in their late teens and early twenties want to have a social life. I can certainly understand why they turn to this crap to get a touch of the life they wish they could have, and at least to a certain extent deserve to have.

  60. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    One of the only fond memories of have of my High School Latin class was translating a missive from the Roman senate to the people bemoaning how young people are not as respectful to their elders as they used to be, and that their society was becoming morally bankrupt.

    Every generation looks at their children as being somehow increasingly disrespectful and making poor moral decisions. That perception is weirdly constant.

    Except for an objective few with clear heads, like Cicero. His defense of Marcus Caelius Rufus contains a lot of wisdom about the nature of youth and reasonable expectations of those afflicted. If you haven't read it I recommend it.

    Myself I hope the age will yet dawn when useless and paranoid reactionary moralism (of which Cicero too was ultimately guilty, most obviously in his commentaries De Legibus) will finally subside.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  61. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by khr · · Score: 1

    What I have seen is a salient call for respect. No wonder our older population are so depressed and stressed out.

    You should visit some retirement homes to see for yourself. It's sad. The bad thing is that we're all headed there. God help us.

    Well, the now-old people should've had more respect for the younger people, back before they picked the nursing home...

  62. More like family relations problem by VAElynx · · Score: 1

    To add to what other people's say, this sounds like a family , more than technology fail.
    Casting aside the obvious fact that it isn't surprising for a teen to be utterly bored by certain people (i rembember i spent a few visits i was forced to go to with my programmable calculator at hand, messing with something (also a favourite on boring lessons))
    It's sortta OK... But

    The real fail comes from the fact that she has this sort of relationship with her own grandparents. I may be a strange example as i have spent most time there when i was small, but i'd say that with my grandparents, aunt and uncle i have a better relationship than with my mother.
    Still, i don't think any person i know treats his grandparents as boring strangers , because that's the behaviour she demonstrated there
    I don't know, but does your family actually meet more often than on your father's birthdays ? Because if not, i aren't surprised at the outcome.

  63. Re:also related to obesity by xystren · · Score: 1

    The USA is the most obese nation on earth. 40 years ago children played by going outside and having pickup games of baseball or soccer or touch football, running around and getting exercise. Now, they "play" by sitting there and moving only their thumbs.

    You forgot broom ball, street hockey (Car...Game on!) and how about just plain riding a bike? I remember some of the crazy stuff we used to do on our bikes and spend the entire day doing it.

    Times have sure changed.

  64. phantom like/dislike buttons by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    Bear with me - it's a bit of a story. Anyway, I refuse to own a car, I have a motorcycle instead. As such, I rarely listen to standard "radio" anymore. While at work, I listen to Pandora - have for a while now.
    Every once in a while (pretty rarely, actually) I drive my wife's car. And despite now being aware that I do it - I can't stop myself from subconsciously trying to thumb down a song that comes on that I don't like. Proof that humans have some intelligence and can infer, I adapt my environment and thus reach out to the source of the music - the radio. My hands fumble around, and I make quick glances, certain that somewhere...there's a thumbs-down button. Then I catch myself doing what I'm doing, laugh, and change the channel.
    Anyway, there's my funny story.

  65. What's wrong, couldn't find an older story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA is from a year ago.

  66. These kids, today ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... back in my day we did it honestly, with powerful, mind-altering drugs.

  67. Look at me. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I got addicted to computers, BBS', Internet, computer games, etc. Look at me at 35+ years old single virgin living with parents. Oh wait... :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  68. Only the beginning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Working at a university, I wasn't surprised at all by this study. The kids are so addicted to their various media devices that we can watch, pretty much weekly, students walking into one another or into lamp-posts because they're busy text'ing away. I find it sad that they've lost the ability to socialize normally and "need" this level of connectivity in their life. But I suppose it's little different than other addicting habits in that once you get into it, it's hard to stop. Or maybe they should just take up a few outdoor-ish hobbies to get their minds off the digital world.

    Personally, I work as a senior Network admin and engineer. My career always has me surrounded by technology, I personally am not addicted to it. I don't own a smartphone, don't care about being disconnected for a few days (actually, it's very nice to be unplugged) and prefer books to any digital media. (on that note, this is amusing: http://www.wimp.com/abook/). But is this something that's dying with the older generations? I'm generation-X... and we're all now in our 30s and 40s. :/

  69. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    Incedntally, that's EXACTLY my point.

  70. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if it's not as bad as evil heroin, then it's the parents and students' responsibility, and that simply can't be!

  71. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    And sorry, I didn't see that you were the OP. Since we agree that you can add stupid criteria bto this kind of study to make anyone best at anything, do you have links to a source for your numbers?

  72. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by robot_love · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry you had such a rough time. Unfortunately, scientific research is beginning to show that there is little difference between heroine addiction, cell phone addiction and eating too much. Your experience may make you feel entitled to your opinion, but it has little to do with reality.

    --
    .there is enough of everything for everyone.
  73. Re:It's amazing how we see ourselves in the world. by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    The survey was done on a points scale. There was a max score of 100. Some proportion of those points was based on "people cured per capita," and others were based on "social interest type goals." A country that cured 100% of its diseases on a non-socialist system would not get a perfect score. IIRC, the proportion was 60% people cured, and 40% human interest goals (of which being socialist was only one.) I don't have the survey in front of me or I'd give a link. I can't swear to the proportions, but that was the methodology.

  74. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by DerekLyons · · Score: 0

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bullshit. You bitch slap the person till the get in fucking line.

    You're obviously speaking as someone who has never dealt with such an addiction either in yourself or in a close family member. Long story short - you're not only wrong, you're clueless. It's nowhere near that simple.
     

    I find that someone considers even comparing drug addiction to cell phone addiction to be very fucking insulting.

    So you're a self centered jackass. So what?
     

    For example, when I would get put in jail (and i would, on occasion, because thats where real addiction can land you), I would get physically sick without my dope. I'd end up puking, having the runs, not able to eat, wishing i was dead, or better, that i could get well (which I didn't realize at the time, i was getting well, by not using!).

    And you think people with mental addictions can just walk away from whatever they're addicted to with no repercussions? You think they don't suffer physical symptoms or replace one destructive behavior with another? You're wrong on both counts.
     

    Anyways, this is bullshit, and insult to anyone who's built their life back up after losing it to a truelly addictive thing.

    Grow up, the world doesn't revolve around you.

  75. Singularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about bloody time.

    The cell phone has developed into an extension of one's self, like an extra sense. So an addiction to your phone is like having an addiction to your sight. Yeah, we give people a way to connect to the internet, a practically limitless source of information, and then when we take it away from them we're scratching our heads as to why they don't like it.

    Somethings off here... Ahem...

    The cell phone is an extremely primitive version of telepathy. I welcome its integration into our self.

    1. Re:Singularity by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      yeah.... although I did not foresee that the telepathy I read about so much in books would all be mediated through business and police. I think HTTG got it right when he predicted it will be a curse, not a blessing. Which is not the future I read about and want, so I hope I can continue to convince myself there is nobility in this new "addiction to virtual sight"

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  76. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by neurophil12 · · Score: 1

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bullshit.

    That is a simple and ignorant position to take. Physical addiction and mental addiction are two different conditions that often go together (like in drug addiction), but that doesn't mean mental addiction can't be a very serious thing (as Laxori's post a few down makes clear). What is important in addiction is the narrowing of perspective and devaluing of otherwise valuable things in order to feed the addiction. Video games, internet, and text messaging all have a high potential to be the focus of addiction because of the way they produce dopamine release in the brain. Pushing buttons, controlling an environment, and getting quick rewards, when lacking sufficient complexity to engage our higher order brain areas can lead to a strong desire to keep doing the same while at the same time reducing self-control. A person doesn't just have or not have self-control, it is something that parts of the brain do. Thus, if you partake in activities that inhibit those brain areas and over time weaken them relative to other things that provide reward, you will have a harder time tearing yourself away from the activity: addiction. Yes, drugs will generally pull you in further and more quickly, but that doesn't mean one can't become partially addicted to these technologies. Moreover, there are people, probably those already prone to addiction in general, that get intensely addicted such that they stop eating, sleeping, studying, and/or working. How that isn't serious addiction you'll have to explain to me.

    These effects can occur with a person in their room online for a long time, but a new array of issues arise when dealing with mobile devices. Now you can feed your addiction on the run, between and even during other tasks. This makes it easier to become addicted and more difficult to break it. It can lead to greater irritability, particularly for a child who doesn't have a fully developed prefrontal cortex, if they are torn away from their devise for whatever reason. Sure, there are some kids who are just rude and don't care about the people around them, but there are also kids that do care but get pulled in anyway. They might say they'd like to spend more time doing X, but they don't do it because they don't know how to break the addiction. People in general, and parents specifically, need to understand this process in order to engineer ways to help their children break away and be more healthy, particularly if the child wants to get better.

  77. I get high on information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody ever says, "I want to be a junkie when I grow up"

  78. Suck it up, tool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that you had a rough time with addiction doesn't mean that there isn't a problem here worth examining.

    And examining the science, it would appear that addiction to opiate drugs and addiction to novelty stems from the same mechanism in the brain. So it's possible that addiction to drugs and addiction to novelty is the *same thing*. We may eventually see people suffer physical withdrawal symptoms resulting from an intervention.

    If you have an argument based on evidence and logic, I'd like to hear it. Otherwise...

    And for the record, it's OK for you to be insulted.

  79. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you trolling?

    If not, then I don't mean to belittle what you went through, but your post is amazingly stupid. Addiction has a certain definition; it typically implies a loss of control on the part of the abdictee (you can't keep yourself away from Facebook), withdrawal symptoms (you feel bad when you try to stay away after all), and a negative impact on your life even when you're doing it (a detrimental effect on your actual social life, for instance, your health, your studies/job etc).

    Some things are more addictive than others. Some things are easier to get hooked on; some things take longer (and more willpower) to get off of; some things will have larger, more significant effects on you. But "lesser" addictions are still bad, just like getting slapped in the face is still bad even though you could also have been murdered instead.

    Oh yes, and addiction is always a mental thing. Substances can have other effects as well, of course, either by their presence or absence (the "getting sick" you describe), but lots of things cause you to puke, have the runs, be unable to eat etc.; these are side effects, not a constituting part of the addiction. The salient point is that addictive substances hook into your body's neurochemistry, and thus have an effect on your mind.

    Given that, it is nonsensical to assume that things that are not physical substances cannot be addictive, as you appear to do. If anything, it's surprising that *drugs* can have such a large effect on your psyche.

  80. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done work on addictions counseling, I've volunteered with harm reduction groups, used to moderate on Bluelight, blah blah blah. I feel the same way you do. All these people are deluded, whinging about how teenagers are addicted because they get anxious when they can't text or use Facebook.. It's the stupid, bourgeois hyperbole of people who've never had to deal with real addiction in their entire shallow, safe, comfortable, middle-class lives, and it's insulting. They've never had to deal with alcoholic fathers, or watching friends waste away, or seen people do stupid shit like IVing crushed up percocets or committing crimes to buy coke.
     
    To quote an exchange from Half Baked, via Wikiquote:

            Thurgood: I'm here today because I'm addicted..to marijuana.
            Rehab patient: You in here 'cuz of marijuana?! Man, this is some BULLSHIT!
            Bob Saget/Cocaine addict: Marijuana is not a drug. I used to suck dick for coke.
            Rehab patient: I seen him [do it]!
            Bob Saget/Cocaine addict: Now that's an addiction, man. You ever suck some dick for marijuana?
            Thurgood: No, I can't say I have.
            Bob Saget/Cocaine addict: I didn't think so.
            Rehab patient: Boo this man!

    [crowd boos]

  81. then do something about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A physical drug addiction may be an order of magnitude or two worse than being addicted to the internet and social networks but that doesn't mean that it isn't a problem that causes people to basically self destruct, and belittling one person's problem because yours was worse doesn't help anyone much. In fact, I'd be far more interested in knowing more about how you quit as that information might be put to use by some hopeless internet/WoW/Facebook addict reading the comments here. What made you decide that you had had enough? How did you keep motivated enough to go through with it? What would you recommend that these people do in order to help them quit?

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bullshit. You bitch slap the person till the get in fucking line.

    Not everyone has someone close who cares enough to bitch slap them into line.

  82. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bulls***. You b**** slap the person till the get in f***ing line.

    This is the only bullshit I see around here.

  83. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My marriage ended because my spouse could not get off of world of warcraft. Did she throw up from lack of playing? No. Did her brain reward her for doing it? Yes. Did she fuck up her kids heads and their lives? Absolutely. Her son was in advanced math and started getting 15% on tests. His dream of being an engineer is in peril now. Divorce is hard and so are people losing opportunities like dropping out of schooll and flipping burgers or losing a relationship. Like a drug they can ruin a life.

  84. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bullshit. You bitch slap the person till the get in fucking line.

    Go study some brain chemistry and come back to us with an educated claim. Addiction can have triggers that are not due to chemicals introduced into the blood stream. That does not mean that the addiction cannot cause actual physiological symptoms and be a serious hurdle to overcome.

    Judging the hardships of others purely based on your own experience is simply arrogant. With your logic no one on this planet should commit suicide since there is no chemical messing with their brain.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  85. Unemployment by tepples · · Score: 1

    You seem to think you speak for every prepaid service in the universe. I assure you that some do not.

    I speak for every prepaid service that I've tried: TracFone, Virgin Mobile USA, and two different services offered by what are now AT&T subsidiaries. All require periodic top-ups in order to keep dial tone.

    Further, your 'what if everybody turns them down?' scenario is unrealistic. If somebody seriously approached so many people and came up empty, I would question the approach far more than the real availability of work.

    For one thing, when I was looking for a job straight out of college, I got the same result: "we went with another candidate" times several dozen. For another, if all the kids in the neighborhood are doing services for a limited set of grown-ups, eventually the grown-ups will run out of work to do.

    1. Re:Unemployment by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1
      I'll see your anecdotes and raise you my own. Verizon and Boost, among many, offer prepaid minutes that will not expire for 90+ days. I used Verizon myself back then. It's a very dangerous habit to think in terms of 'x is outside of my experience, therefore x doesn't exist.' At a minimum you could have done some research before grasping at that straw.

      For one thing, when I was looking for a job straight out of college, I got the same result: "we went with another candidate" times several dozen.

      But you *did* get a job eventually I'm sure. That's the whole point. Going through the experience in childhood when the thing itself doesn't really matter prepares children mentally for the reality of adulthood when it does matter.

      For another, if all the kids in the neighborhood are doing services for a limited set of grown-ups, eventually the grown-ups will run out of work to do.

      Yeah right, just like the economy runs out of jobs. Unemployment is a metric, not a permanent personal reality. If there's 10% unemployment, it doesn't mean that 10% of people will never be employed. It simply means that a) time must pass for market conditions to warrant the creation of new positions b) some people will fall short of expectations or leave voluntarily for other opportunities and need to be replaced c) some unemployed will start their own businesses instead of waiting for somebody to give them employment etc.

      I swear it really is a poverty of imagination. Just because it's kids doesn't mean it's not a market. Undercut people, find some kind of value added, expand the scope of services etc. etc.

      I hope you don't have kids. Your "I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas!" approach is not only uninspiring and unresourceful but would be completely corrosive to childhood development.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  86. Remember they are the future not you by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

    People used to holler that TV was making the kids stupid and there was a new study every week “proving” it.
    The people doing these studies simply have no understanding of media science.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding_Media:_The_Extensions_of_Man is a good beginning.

    It's the shift from the industrial age to the electronic age people.

    Pretty soon these kids with no "real world" skills will be pitying you like you pity the old people who can barely browse a web page and get confused by e-mail. Just like them you will be untrainable in the new media space.

    These phones are a prosthetic for the nervous system. They extend it as all electronic media does.
    The reason the kids seem like they’re not even in the room is because they aren’t. They’re hanging out with their friends. You’re old and being around you harshes their buzz.

    The kids’ sensory balance adjusts to this environment numbing certain faculties while sensitizing others that are numbed in you. The reason they have withdrawal symptoms is because you are chopping off a piece of their sensory apparatus. If I jam a pencil in your ear before having a conversation with you I guarantee it won’t be a pleasant conversation and you won’t exactly shine.

    These phones will disappear soon. There will be no faces buried in screens just visual overlays. There will be no typing just thinking. These kids’ thoughts will take place across the planet and their minds will be linked intimately with their friends in ways you will never experience.
    Your tiny little minds will still be trapped inside the prison of your head.

    Your sense of superiority over these kids is rooted firmly in your obsolescence.

    One day soon you will have to ask a question of one of these kids to figure out what the hell is going on and they will roll their eyes, sigh deeply and talk down to you like a granny they are helping to cross the street.

  87. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of Maslow's hierarchy of needs?

    People adapt. If one need is fulfilled, you take it for granted and concentrate on the next unfulfilled need.
    If people spent all their time being grateful for and eulogizing what they already have, this wouldn't work.

    If you don't believe this statement holds much worth, then, by your values, old and grumpy people (that complain about really small things all the time) would be very meaningless.

  88. Re:mental addiction is by mentally stupid people, by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Look. Mental addiction is just mental. It's bullshit. You bitch slap the person till the get in fucking line.

    Go study some brain chemistry and come back to us with an educated claim. Addiction can have triggers that are not due to chemicals introduced into the blood stream. That does not mean that the addiction cannot cause actual physiological symptoms and be a serious hurdle to overcome.

    Judging the hardships of others purely based on your own experience is simply arrogant. With your logic no one on this planet should commit suicide since there is no chemical messing with their brain.

    I agree,

    A physiological dependency is as real as chemical dependency, but treated very differently.

    Perhaps we should Bitch Slap the GP till he gets back into fucking line.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  89. Account balance will expire by tepples · · Score: 1

    Verizon and Boost, among many, offer prepaid minutes that will not expire for 90+ days.

    How long is the +? I checked Boost's web site, and just like Virgin, Boost's page says "Recharge at least once every 90 days to keep your account active (after 90 days any credit balance will expire)." Verizon doesn't even last that long. From its page: "Once activated, account balance will expire based on initial payment or in 60 days, whichever is longer."

    But you *did* get a job eventually I'm sure.

    In order to get the job I have now, I had to get the state to bring in a job placement service specializing in disabilities such as my (professionally diagnosed) mental disorder. Without the employment consultant explaining my disability to my employer, I likely would have been rejected for some of the mannerisms that my disability caused during interviews. But vocational rehabilitation is a social(ist) program, and its funding could be cut at any moment.

    some unemployed will start their own businesses

    To what extent can a minor seeking to pay for his own cell phone plan do this?

    Undercut people

    How does one undercut free?