And this is why the global warming freaks are crazy. Ultimately taxing carbon is like taxing breathing. Everytime you breathe you expel carbon. Everytime you piss or shit you expel carbon. Everytime you eat food you're freeing sequestered carbon. Anytime you are LIVING your life you are participating in this cycle and you're not algea or plants, you do the other part of it.
The most ridiculous thing in the world is to think that it's A.O.K. to limit and tax and blame people for living their lives.
'Walking is not zero emission because we need food energy to move ourselves from place to place'
Seriously, what the fuck? Why don't you tell people to just go off themselves. Stop eating, stop walking, stop breathing. Just off yourselves. Is that what you're really getting at? If someone comes out with transportation that has a lower "carbon footprint" than walking, let's say growing living bamboo into a vehicle that sequesters carbon as you ride, are you going to try to guilt people out of walking too? Then you have to eat less because you didn't expend all that waste energy walking and we can ration everyone's food too right?
Well, before someone posts: "yeah man you should off yourself", I'll tell you this, if it comes to that I'd much rather kill YOU.
But until then, let us live our lives without this fucking preachy-ness.
Those giant touch screens used by CNN anchors look slick
No, they really don't. Can we please go back to when professional artists made the graphics and let the mouthwhores go back to reading their teleprompter rather than faffing around with a big screen.
Welcome to the libertarian viewpoint. We do away with income tax and you get to spend your money on things you care about. Put it to use where it's most efficient.
Fund a telescope array, feed the needy, keep non-profit hospitals open, invest in the local electric car startups, go part time at work and volunteer at the local EFF. I'm willing to bet you can spend your money better than the government can. Crowdsourcing could be the way of the future of the government would just get off your backs.
No more bridges to nowhere and tax refunds for G.E.
No more occupations, murder and wars.
You're quite a bit less likely to have a burglary in the US than you are in Australia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, New Zealand, the UK, Poland, or Canada.
That's probably because compared to those other countries you're more likely to get shot in the face for burglary.
I'll tell you what, unless you're a pre-teen, there has been plenty of evidence of microsoft being a shithead, eat-your-baby, fuck-their-friends-wife-in-the-ass type of corporation. It should be pretty clear to you by now why people hate that corporation. If you're just being obtuse, go fucking google this shit or even just hit search on this page.
The only part I really take offense in your post is that you call M$ haters mindless. We're absolutely normal people who don't have the memory of a goldfish.
And you know what? With what they have pulled and tried to pull, they deserve all this hatred for the rest of our lives. Fuck them and Fuck you for being so ignorant.
How can you do any inflation analysis and exclude the rest of the world? Dollars don't stay neatly inside the borders and there's also something called currency exchange.
By the way, inflation is the increase of the money supply. Price increase, bottlenecks, increased demand whatever you want to talk about are symptoms of inflation.
The way I see it he did two things and both of them are perfectly legal:
Use computers that were made available for him to use by the apple stores
take pictures of people in public places
Taking pictures of people in public places is legal many times over, it's not even worth discussing.
Using the computers that were put there for public use, is completely legal as well. He did not sign any contract saying what he would or would not do on them, there was no agreement signed that he would not install software on them. They're just offered up for public usage and installing software is such usage.
I don't see anything legally, ethically or morally wrong with what he did. In fact, I hope he sues the bejeezus out of the thugs who broke into his house and stole his equipment.
That's the whole point ain't it? They're not making it clear at all, in fact they are tricking people into thinking that you can leave even after one year and cash out 25% of your options, when in reality you can't cash any until one year after you're fully vested.
The entire language about 25% vesting per year has no other purpose being there than to con people.
Re:Is it even possible to roll back a bitcoin trad
on
Bitcoin Price Crashes
·
· Score: 1
Dude they put your monkey to work and he's trading better than they are as we speak.
Re:Bitcoin to revolutionise economy
on
Bitcoin Price Crashes
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
LOL, even a child can figure this exploit out.
You as a bank lend me $100. I deposit it in my account with you. You now have $100 in deposits and can lend me $1000. I deposit it back into my account and you now have $1000 in deposits and can lend me $10,000. Repeat ad nauseum. In actuality, between us we only have $10 and not $10,000.
Now I suppose we could reverse the situation If I just paid all my loans back. But that's not possible because you don't want the principal back. You want principal + interest.
Where does the money come to pay the interest? It doesn't, because it doesn't exist.
In fact, the same ponzy scheme is played out at the currency level.
For every $ the FED creates and disperses into the money supply, they charge interest on. Which means, they want that $+interest back. But if they only gave out a $ but they want $+interest back, where does the money come from to pay the interest? It doesn't exist. It can never be paid back.
The only solution is to create more money. And that's why we're in the shite we're in today and why the $ is worth only 4 cents of what it used to be worth.
We also pay for this shite with debt and fabricated currency. You can keep printing money all you like and running it through the 'economy' it ain't gonna make anything better.
With all the shit talking people do here on RMS, he's right on a lot of fundamental things. This includes his campaign against cloud services.
The only reason you would have your host rename your blog or account with no regard to you is because you are not your own host. People enter into these disgusting one sided contracts multiple times per day and then they're surprised when the party holding all the cards actually plays them. It's the definition of stupidity.
Willingly signing your rights away and then run around crying when you get shafted. Then you run crying to the politicians because now you need them to fix it, you don't care what they do but something must be done about it. And of course they seize the moment to push through whatever power grabbing measures that only go one way, ratcheting away everyone else's freedoms too with all sorts of unintended consequences.
How is it possible that you completely missed the point and the benefit of the pro bono corporate legal advice?
He did in fact say much the opposite to what you are saying he said and the narrow definition you picked up was your own.
Let me try to explain how I read it. Simply put, you cannot hijack the GPL license by using technical tricks if your intention is clearly to hijack the license. Doesn't matter how you do it, you throw a jury trial in the mix and when your intentions are recognized you stand a good chance of losing.
When you employ dirty technical tricks to subvert the spirit of the law and the intentions of the generous Free Software hackers, ya might lose in court.
In my experienced, they pulled me out of the car without saying a damn word to me, cuffed me and began searching it. They didn't even identify themselves as police officers, although they were wearing uniforms.
Good luck if that's not captured on camera, it's your word vs theirs. And if you do get it on camera they'll either take it from you and destroy it or arrest you for wiretapping them.
Slashdot Mirror
And this is why the global warming freaks are crazy. Ultimately taxing carbon is like taxing breathing. Everytime you breathe you expel carbon. Everytime you piss or shit you expel carbon. Everytime you eat food you're freeing sequestered carbon. Anytime you are LIVING your life you are participating in this cycle and you're not algea or plants, you do the other part of it.
The most ridiculous thing in the world is to think that it's A.O.K. to limit and tax and blame people for living their lives.
'Walking is not zero emission because we need food energy to move ourselves from place to place'
Seriously, what the fuck? Why don't you tell people to just go off themselves. Stop eating, stop walking, stop breathing. Just off yourselves. Is that what you're really getting at? If someone comes out with transportation that has a lower "carbon footprint" than walking, let's say growing living bamboo into a vehicle that sequesters carbon as you ride, are you going to try to guilt people out of walking too? Then you have to eat less because you didn't expend all that waste energy walking and we can ration everyone's food too right?
Well, before someone posts: "yeah man you should off yourself", I'll tell you this, if it comes to that I'd much rather kill YOU.
But until then, let us live our lives without this fucking preachy-ness.
Those giant touch screens used by CNN anchors look slick
No, they really don't. Can we please go back to when professional artists made the graphics and let the mouthwhores go back to reading their teleprompter rather than faffing around with a big screen.
"We have proof" is very well accepted to mean that the person is IN POSSESSION of such evidence AND prepared to show it.
Perhaps there should be changes to the law, to make small claim's court responsible for minor copyright infractions by users.
Cool, tell your lobbyists to beat the lobbyists of the RIAA and then.... Oh shit, yeah you don't have any.
Fund a telescope array, feed the needy, keep non-profit hospitals open, invest in the local electric car startups, go part time at work and volunteer at the local EFF. I'm willing to bet you can spend your money better than the government can. Crowdsourcing could be the way of the future of the government would just get off your backs.
No more bridges to nowhere and tax refunds for G.E.
No more occupations, murder and wars.
You're quite a bit less likely to have a burglary in the US than you are in Australia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, New Zealand, the UK, Poland, or Canada.
That's probably because compared to those other countries you're more likely to get shot in the face for burglary.
I'll tell you what, unless you're a pre-teen, there has been plenty of evidence of microsoft being a shithead, eat-your-baby, fuck-their-friends-wife-in-the-ass type of corporation. It should be pretty clear to you by now why people hate that corporation. If you're just being obtuse, go fucking google this shit or even just hit search on this page.
The only part I really take offense in your post is that you call M$ haters mindless. We're absolutely normal people who don't have the memory of a goldfish.
And you know what? With what they have pulled and tried to pull, they deserve all this hatred for the rest of our lives. Fuck them and Fuck you for being so ignorant.
Awww. Did somebody hurt baby's feelings? Poor baby rwven. It's rough out there on the intertubes :-/
These people are complete pricks and their words leave you and baby zucky sads. Poo.
Clicky
By the way, inflation is the increase of the money supply. Price increase, bottlenecks, increased demand whatever you want to talk about are symptoms of inflation.
You are retarded.
Somebody has been hanging around too many trannies
I've got only one question:
What are the colors of the roofs on Clinton's various properties?
The way I see it he did two things and both of them are perfectly legal:
Taking pictures of people in public places is legal many times over, it's not even worth discussing.
Using the computers that were put there for public use, is completely legal as well. He did not sign any contract saying what he would or would not do on them, there was no agreement signed that he would not install software on them. They're just offered up for public usage and installing software is such usage.
I don't see anything legally, ethically or morally wrong with what he did. In fact, I hope he sues the bejeezus out of the thugs who broke into his house and stole his equipment.
His movie had a second half?
The entire language about 25% vesting per year has no other purpose being there than to con people.
Dude they put your monkey to work and he's trading better than they are as we speak.
You as a bank lend me $100. I deposit it in my account with you. You now have $100 in deposits and can lend me $1000. I deposit it back into my account and you now have $1000 in deposits and can lend me $10,000. Repeat ad nauseum. In actuality, between us we only have $10 and not $10,000.
Now I suppose we could reverse the situation If I just paid all my loans back. But that's not possible because you don't want the principal back. You want principal + interest.
Where does the money come to pay the interest? It doesn't, because it doesn't exist.
In fact, the same ponzy scheme is played out at the currency level.
For every $ the FED creates and disperses into the money supply, they charge interest on. Which means, they want that $+interest back. But if they only gave out a $ but they want $+interest back, where does the money come from to pay the interest? It doesn't exist. It can never be paid back.
The only solution is to create more money. And that's why we're in the shite we're in today and why the $ is worth only 4 cents of what it used to be worth.
We also pay for this shite with debt and fabricated currency. You can keep printing money all you like and running it through the 'economy' it ain't gonna make anything better.
With all the shit talking people do here on RMS, he's right on a lot of fundamental things. This includes his campaign against cloud services.
The only reason you would have your host rename your blog or account with no regard to you is because you are not your own host. People enter into these disgusting one sided contracts multiple times per day and then they're surprised when the party holding all the cards actually plays them. It's the definition of stupidity.
Willingly signing your rights away and then run around crying when you get shafted. Then you run crying to the politicians because now you need them to fix it, you don't care what they do but something must be done about it. And of course they seize the moment to push through whatever power grabbing measures that only go one way, ratcheting away everyone else's freedoms too with all sorts of unintended consequences.
Same reason I'll never get a damn kindle.
I think it's important to point out that the Google-authored portion of Chromium is released under the BSD license.
He did in fact say much the opposite to what you are saying he said and the narrow definition you picked up was your own.
Let me try to explain how I read it. Simply put, you cannot hijack the GPL license by using technical tricks if your intention is clearly to hijack the license. Doesn't matter how you do it, you throw a jury trial in the mix and when your intentions are recognized you stand a good chance of losing.
When you employ dirty technical tricks to subvert the spirit of the law and the intentions of the generous Free Software hackers, ya might lose in court.
Instead of reading as "two researchers prove their point" this thing reads more like "two researchers prove their own idiocy"
In my experienced, they pulled me out of the car without saying a damn word to me, cuffed me and began searching it. They didn't even identify themselves as police officers, although they were wearing uniforms.
Good luck if that's not captured on camera, it's your word vs theirs. And if you do get it on camera they'll either take it from you and destroy it or arrest you for wiretapping them.