Please tell me you're not planning to stay FULL RETARD.
Doctors can't see your medical records unless you sign a release and allow them access, usually by joining their practice as a patient.
Only after that, can they request your records from your previous doctors and only then will they be provided, usually by mail.
The NSA on the other hand, probably has them in a database and at their fingertips already. Which ones you ask? ALL of them (that are in electronic medical record clouds).
Who cares how much anything costs? This is the government after all and they have magic money. They can give FREE healthcare and FREE unemployment benefits, the have something called a central bank that gives them FREE MONEY, so who cares how much it costs.
This is the socialists wet dream, until the government spends their magic money on something they don't personally like, then it's like woooah, hold on how much does this cost?
How much does it cost? Fucking nothing that's how much. It's free money. Who cares? You care? Well fuck you, we have the guns and we only care about the uber riche. That's the reality of government.
Maybe someday the communist socialist ilks will realize that for every victory they have, the person in charge of the government gun that points at people, ain't them.
I mean really, this is the oldest trick in the book of corrupt politicians. Pretend there's a problem, fabricate one, coopt one, wait for the outcry from the retard population of "do something, you gotta do something I don't care what. Think of the children", then propose your real goal, the 'solution'.
This is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
The challenge is picking out the conversations of interest since there simply is too much data to sift through and get timely actionable information.
See here:
"Greenwald reprints in the book an NSA slide from Snowden's documents that, when he first saw it, almost made him laugh because it is so surreal. Titled "New Collection Posture", it sets out the scale of the NSA's ambitions in astonishingly frank terms: "Sniff it all, Know it all, Collect it all, Process it all, Exploit it all, Partner it all.""
The people responsible were the ones voted into office and career state workers. How would you suggest to hold them responsible?
It's an inherent flaw in 'governments'. People will give 'free' stuff to get votes and then will funnel money to their cronies, accruing huge bills that must be papered over or defaulted on every so often. The losers are the people (even the ones who get the 'free' stuff) and the currencies and creditors.
Government the way it's done these days is immoral.
This makes no sense at all. Free markets are based on individuals making voluntary decisions. Bribing politicians to gain access to the power of the gun and theft is not in any way related.
The german debt wasn't debts they acquired from spending. It was the vitors of the war putting a gun to their head and saying "sign this paper that says you owe us an eye watering sum you can never pay". That's not debt, that's extortion.
The greek debts come from their own unwise choices.
Slashdot Mirror
Please tell me you're not planning to stay FULL RETARD.
Doctors can't see your medical records unless you sign a release and allow them access, usually by joining their practice as a patient.
Only after that, can they request your records from your previous doctors and only then will they be provided, usually by mail.
The NSA on the other hand, probably has them in a database and at their fingertips already. Which ones you ask? ALL of them (that are in electronic medical record clouds).
Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
I don't buy your claims, and your claims are used to justify the government intervention.
The Netherlands regulates taxis in order to maintain various standards of safety and fair competition.
I contend that regulation neither helps safety or competition.
My position is the default position because it doesn't require the initiation of force against other individuals.
Now what?
NT, there's no need to elaborate.
Don't believe everything you read on wikipedia:
Tom Woods HS lecture
Who cares how much anything costs? This is the government after all and they have magic money. They can give FREE healthcare and FREE unemployment benefits, the have something called a central bank that gives them FREE MONEY, so who cares how much it costs.
This is the socialists wet dream, until the government spends their magic money on something they don't personally like, then it's like woooah, hold on how much does this cost?
How much does it cost? Fucking nothing that's how much. It's free money. Who cares? You care? Well fuck you, we have the guns and we only care about the uber riche. That's the reality of government.
Maybe someday the communist socialist ilks will realize that for every victory they have, the person in charge of the government gun that points at people, ain't them.
I mean really, this is the oldest trick in the book of corrupt politicians. Pretend there's a problem, fabricate one, coopt one, wait for the outcry from the retard population of "do something, you gotta do something I don't care what. Think of the children", then propose your real goal, the 'solution'.
This is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
I'm not affected, I know of nobody who is affected.
This is a power grab pure and simple and all you retards fell for it.
I don't understand. How are you affected by network scheduling? Please explain.
The laws of physics? Because the article you link clearly states it is the initial capital investment.
You are full of shit.
The challenge is picking out the conversations of interest since there simply is too much data to sift through and get timely actionable information.
See here:
"Greenwald reprints in the book an NSA slide from Snowden's documents that, when he first saw it, almost made him laugh because it is so surreal. Titled "New Collection Posture", it sets out the scale of the NSA's ambitions in astonishingly frank terms: "Sniff it all, Know it all, Collect it all, Process it all, Exploit it all, Partner it all.""
No, you know. Disagree with having to give up my hard earned money for essentially no services.
Ha. I wish I would 'suffer' deflation. Then my savings would actually be worth something.
It's an inherent flaw in 'governments'. People will give 'free' stuff to get votes and then will funnel money to their cronies, accruing huge bills that must be papered over or defaulted on every so often. The losers are the people (even the ones who get the 'free' stuff) and the currencies and creditors.
Government the way it's done these days is immoral.
If you're a bank and you can take a risky bet, if you win you make big bucks, if you lose the taxpayer pays, what would you do?
You only have the read the comments at your own article...
I'm not against the voluntary helping of people. Don't sell it as an economic plan.
Do I have the right to disagree with this arrangement?
That's like asking "is there a car for those days when I have to take my daughter to school but I"m menstruating."
The GPL v3 protects the rights of the USER better than the GPL v2.
And Lobbyism is a market too.
This makes no sense at all. Free markets are based on individuals making voluntary decisions. Bribing politicians to gain access to the power of the gun and theft is not in any way related.
Except that it's not actually 'free'. You understand this right?
The greek debts come from their own unwise choices.
Giving people money to spend (which comes from where?) distorts the signals to the market and causes mal-investment.