VMWare offers two different solutions for this type of problem; VMWware ACE and VMWare Virtual Desktop Infrastructure.
VMWare ACEhttp://www.vmware.com/products/ace/
VMWare ACE provides a managed architecture for deploying virtual machines to individual computers. In your scenario it would still be necessary to use roaming profiles or some other technique to allow a user to log on to different machines and have the same user experience. Data files (My Documents, etc.) could be stored on network shares. ACE is most likely not an appropriate solution for you.
VMWare VDIhttp://www.vmware.com/solutions/desktop/vdi.html
VMWare Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) provides an architecture where the user actually uses a virtual machine running on a server with only a thin client on the desktop. The virtual machine runs on ESXServer and can be secured in the data center. A user can access the same virtual machine from any desktop; local or remote. VDI is likely an appropriate solution for you.
I see how this works. Charles Manson claims to be Jesus Christ, his existence is documented in court and prison records, therefore God created the universe. Brilliant!
When did I say anything about antitrust law or monopolies? I'm just pointing out that people have choice. There are many other platforms out there other than x86 desktops. Whether someone thinks that Microsoft has a monopoly in an arbitrarily defined market is irrelevant since there are still other products that can be used.
I use IE because it is a superior product. Some people agree with me, others don't. People should excercise their choice and use whatever browser they want.
I agree that Windows is by far the most useful operating system, but the fact that software vendors write their software for Windows does not preclude anyone from running another OS. There are applications that exist for the other OS's, though admittedly the ones for Windows are generally far superior.
Yes, you're free to use Yahoo!, Google, MSN, Ask, or any other search engine that you like. You're also free to use Linux, Windows, Mac OS, z/OS, Solaris, or any other operating system that you like.
I agree that rifles can have powerful effects, but I wouldn't classify the rifle as the part that does harm. For example:
Shooting a random person: It is the damage resulting from the impact of the bullet that injures a person who is shot.
Shooting a rapist: I do not believe that rapists should be allowed to live, so I do not feel that shooting them is doing harm so much as restoring the proper balance.
Shooting a racist: The emotional damage is done by the emotional view of the hater. Shooting them should be encouraged and rewarded.
Genesis 22:1And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham, and said unto him, Abraham: and he said, Behold, here I am.
James 1:13Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
Jehoram's son was 2 years older than his father? And was he 22 or 42 when he became king?
2 Chronicles 21:20Thirty and two years old was he when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem eight years, and departed without being desired. Howbeit they buried him in the city of David, but not in the sepulchres of the kings.
2 Chronicles 22:1-2 1: And the inhabitants of Jerusalem made Ahaziah his youngest son king in his stead: for the band of men that came with the Arabians to the camp had slain all the eldest. So Ahaziah the son of Jehoram king of Judah reigned.
2: Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
2 Kings 8:26Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
Did Michal have children or not?
2 Samuel 6:23Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death.
2 Samuel 21:8But the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bare unto Saul, Armoni and Mephibosheth; and the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul, whom she brought up for Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite:
Was Joseph's father Jacob or Heli?
Matthew 1:16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
Luke 3:23And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
Did Jacob see god?
Genesis 32:30And Jacob called the name of the place Peniel: for I have seen God
I also believe there are several different documented accounts of Santa Claus (St. Nicholas, Father Christmas, Kris Kringle), going back well over a thousand years. These accounts of Santa Claus have included historicaly accurate information, such as the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade and the Dutch control of New York. Santa's existence has been confirmed by the New York Sun on Sept. 21, 1897 and I believe I noticed a news report last Christmas Eve that NORAD was tracking his flight path. Canada has assigned a specific postal code for Santa Claus. I personnally saw Santa in a shopping mall last year, though admittedly my account is anecdotal.
In light of all this evidence must we respect the "theory" of Santa Claus as valid?
I agree. I was speculating on the copyright aspect. The real violation is in trademark. The problem occurs because they have created another product, they are not just resellilng a product they had purchased. I can't cut the Gucci label off of a Gucci purse and sew it onto a homemade one and sell it. I can't cut the Rolex logo out of a piece of marketing material and glue it onto a watch face and sell it. Pabst already licenses and sells clothing and other items, I would think that the trademark infringement is pretty clear.
Yeah, and Peter Jackson, too. I mean, c'mon, how old are those Lord of the Rings books anyway? And there was already a movie before, too. What a copycat hack, sheesh. Get some creativity, for chrissake!
Perhaps my sarcasm wasn't coming through in my post. I agree that selecting Apple hardware as a market for the purpose of identifying a monopoly is completely arbitrary. But I also believe that doing the same with x86 desktops is arbitrary as well.
Plus, I'd really love to see Batman and Wolverine track someone down!:)
But doesn't Apple have a monopoly on operating systems for the Apple hardware platform? I mean, can't you arbitrarily define a specific market (Apple hardware, x86 desktops, Batman comics) and decide that someone has a monopoly there (Apple, Microsoft, DC)?
If I want to run Windows on my iMac, I should be able to do that, right?
If I want to run Linux on my x86 desktop, I should be able to do that, right?
If I want to see Batman join the X-Men in next months issue, I should be able to do that, right?
I agree with you that it's psuedoscience. But what about complete episodes centered around a "holodeck" character coming to life and taking over the ship? The episode was less about the science and more about the struggle. The writers expected a suspension of disbelief. And the entire series can't be judged on a single episode.
Slashdot Mirror
Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?
VMWare offers two different solutions for this type of problem; VMWware ACE and VMWare Virtual Desktop Infrastructure.
VMWare ACE http://www.vmware.com/products/ace/
VMWare ACE provides a managed architecture for deploying virtual machines to individual computers. In your scenario it would still be necessary to use roaming profiles or some other technique to allow a user to log on to different machines and have the same user experience. Data files (My Documents, etc.) could be stored on network shares. ACE is most likely not an appropriate solution for you.
VMWare VDI http://www.vmware.com/solutions/desktop/vdi.html
VMWare Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) provides an architecture where the user actually uses a virtual machine running on a server with only a thin client on the desktop. The virtual machine runs on ESXServer and can be secured in the data center. A user can access the same virtual machine from any desktop; local or remote. VDI is likely an appropriate solution for you.
Belloq...Belloq!
See the Bear of fearsome size!
All the world's within his eyes.
Time grows think, the past's a riddle;
The Tower awaits you in the middle.
See the Turtle of enourmous girth,
on his shell, he holds the earth.
His thoughts are slow, but always kind.
He holds us all within his mind.
I see how this works. Charles Manson claims to be Jesus Christ, his existence is documented in court and prison records, therefore God created the universe. Brilliant!
I use IE because it is a superior product. Some people agree with me, others don't. People should excercise their choice and use whatever browser they want.
I agree that Windows is by far the most useful operating system, but the fact that software vendors write their software for Windows does not preclude anyone from running another OS. There are applications that exist for the other OS's, though admittedly the ones for Windows are generally far superior.
Yes, you're free to use Yahoo!, Google, MSN, Ask, or any other search engine that you like. You're also free to use Linux, Windows, Mac OS, z/OS, Solaris, or any other operating system that you like.
If you had no doors or windows you couldn't get in either.
Shooting a random person: It is the damage resulting from the impact of the bullet that injures a person who is shot.
Shooting a rapist: I do not believe that rapists should be allowed to live, so I do not feel that shooting them is doing harm so much as restoring the proper balance.
Shooting a racist: The emotional damage is done by the emotional view of the hater. Shooting them should be encouraged and rewarded.
Oh, ok. So which bible is internally consistent? Anything can be "internally consistent" after all the errors are identified and edited.
2: Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
In light of all this evidence must we respect the "theory" of Santa Claus as valid?
If this is the quality of the scanned documents then I don't think the publishers have much to be concerned about.
Really? I think the beauty of the Dark Tower universe is that nothing is absolute.
I agree. I was speculating on the copyright aspect. The real violation is in trademark. The problem occurs because they have created another product, they are not just resellilng a product they had purchased. I can't cut the Gucci label off of a Gucci purse and sew it onto a homemade one and sell it. I can't cut the Rolex logo out of a piece of marketing material and glue it onto a watch face and sell it. Pabst already licenses and sells clothing and other items, I would think that the trademark infringement is pretty clear.
Yeah, and Peter Jackson, too. I mean, c'mon, how old are those Lord of the Rings books anyway? And there was already a movie before, too. What a copycat hack, sheesh. Get some creativity, for chrissake!
I would assume that Pabst's lawsuit would claim that the fashion boutique had created a derivative work.
I think Microsoft is betting on people with $500 spending $500. I think MS would rather get $500 for producing 8 games than get $500 for producing 10.
Perhaps my sarcasm wasn't coming through in my post. I agree that selecting Apple hardware as a market for the purpose of identifying a monopoly is completely arbitrary. But I also believe that doing the same with x86 desktops is arbitrary as well.
:)
Plus, I'd really love to see Batman and Wolverine track someone down!
- If I want to run Windows on my iMac, I should be able to do that, right?
- If I want to run Linux on my x86 desktop, I should be able to do that, right?
- If I want to see Batman join the X-Men in next months issue, I should be able to do that, right?
Which of those things am I able to do?I agree with you that it's psuedoscience. But what about complete episodes centered around a "holodeck" character coming to life and taking over the ship? The episode was less about the science and more about the struggle. The writers expected a suspension of disbelief. And the entire series can't be judged on a single episode.